DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Copyright Service. sydney.edu.au/copyright Land Rich, Dirt Poor? Aboriginal land rights, policy failure and policy change from the colonial era to the Northern Territory Intervention Diana Perche A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Government and International Relations Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences University of Sydney 2015 Statement of originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted previously, either in its entirety, or substantially, for a higher degree or qualification at any other University or institute of higher learning. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Diana Perche Abstract This thesis examines the development of Aboriginal land policy in the Northern Territory of Australia, and uses a policy dynamics approach to analyse the policy decision making in this area over long time periods. This approach is useful in helping to uncover key areas of continuity, and gradual change, in Aboriginal land policy, since the early colonial era, and it draws attention to the ways in which policies framed around Aboriginal land rights in the current era have retained links to the earliest policies framed during invasion and settlement. The thesis argues that path dependency has been a very significant feature of Aboriginal land policy, and the Howard Coalition government’s recent amendments to the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 in 2006 and 2007 are better understood as a part of a much longer policy trajectory. The thesis identifies five distinct (though overlapping) temporal sequences: (a) the early colonial era, marked by fear, brutality and misunderstanding between settlers and Indigenous people; (b) the humanitarian era, shaped by the Buxton committee report of 1837 which called for the creation of Aboriginal reserves as both compensation and a form of protection; (c) the later protection era which saw early humanitarian impulses turn to a greater focus on segregation and control; (d) the assimilation era, where reserves were closed in the southern parts of Australia, with the expectation that Aboriginal people join white society, while extensive reserves were retained in the north where Aboriginal people were understood to retain traditional customs and lifestyles; and (e) the land rights era, where activist campaigns in response to prominent conflicts over non-Indigenous use of Aboriginal land for pastoral and mining resulted in governments converting reserves into Aboriginal-owned land, under inalienable communal title. Two critical junctures, in the form of government reviews, are pinpointed as moments where substantial policy change has been rendered possible: the Buxton committee in 1837 and the Aboriginal Land Rights Commission led by Justice Edward Woodward in 1973-4. Outside these critical junctures, policy development has been incremental. The thesis explores the shifting frames used by policy makers around Indigenous land from the colonial era to the present day with respect to four themes: the purpose of allocating sections of land for Aboriginal use or recognition of ownership, access to Indigenous land, difference in terms of Indigenous expectations of ownership and relationship with land, and the governance or power to make decisions with respect to Indigenous land. It traces these themes from the initial formulations of Aboriginal rights to land in terms of humanitarian protection, social justice and economic development in the early colonial era, through to the rise of the land rights movement in the 1960s and the current focus on marketisation, economic development and the push to use Indigenous land to alleviate disadvantage. Careful tracing of each of these themes over time illuminates the path dependency which dominates in this policy area, and isolates the two critical junctures where substantial leaps in problem definition are discernible. The thesis considers Aboriginal land rights policy in the Northern Territory in the light of the current dominant debate around policy failure in Indigenous affairs, and reflects on the Howard government’s strategic use of the frame of policy failure to explain the need for the government to “wind back” land rights. The thesis uses contemporary theory concerning the politics of evaluation (including emphasis on short term contingency and political strategy) and the political use of evidence and expertise in policy making to explain the development of policy on Aboriginal land through each identified temporal sequence, up to and including the most recent sequence spanning the Howard government’s 2006 amendments and the implementation of the Northern Territory Intervention in 2007. The thesis observes the erratic and selective use of expert knowledge of Aboriginal people and their economic, social, spiritual and political relationship with the land, and the persistent triumph of settler ideology over Aboriginal interests in land policy. Table of contents Acknowledgements iii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 The significance of land 3 Land rich, dirt poor: Land rights as policy failure 5 Evaluation, evidence and Indigenous policy making 9 Path dependency in Aboriginal land rights policy 11 Research question 13 Key themes in Aboriginal land rights policy: purpose, difference, governance, access 14 Methodology 16 Outline of this thesis 18 Chapter 2: The dynamics of policy change 21 Explaining policy and policy evaluation 23 How is evaluation used in the policy process? And how does politics intervene? 31 Framing 40 Path dependency, and policy change 45 Conclusion 50 Chapter 3: Early colonialism and the humanitarian critique 51 The arrival of the British settlers: curiosity, resistance and the Frontier War 52 The first reserves: compensation and containment 55 Evaluating colonial policy: Buxton and the humanitarian critique 60 Conclusion 71 Chapter 4: Protection, segregation and the extensive reserve 74 Self-government, and post-frontier policy making 75 Victoria 76 New South Wales 80 Queensland 83 Western Australia 87 South Australia and the Northern Territory 89 Northern Territory and Commonwealth control 93 Conclusion 100 Chapter 5: From reserves to rights 103 Redefining the “Aboriginal problem”: from protection to assimilation 104 Experts, evidence and new ideas 106 Hasluck’s new frame: citizenship, assimilation and reserves 112 Yirrkala 116 The rise of “land rights”: activism and the Aboriginal social movement 123 Resistance, and reaction 127 The Milirrpum decision 129 A window of opportunity 131 Conclusion 134 Chapter 6: From Land Rights to Legislation 136 Preparing for the window of opportunity: A new policy direction for Labor 137 Emerging political alternatives: the importance of sequencing 141 Revising the Labor Party Platform: putting Aboriginal land rights on the formal agenda 144 The 1972 election policy promise 145 The Aboriginal Land Rights Commission 147 Woodward’s critical juncture: the “high-water mark of possible Aboriginal aspirations” 150 From recommendations to legislation 158 Consolidation 161 Rowland: Evaluation as a “Working Paper” 163 Toohey: “Seven Years On” 166 Conclusion 170 Chapter 7: A new generation? 174 Temporality and policy: review 175 Aboriginal land under scrutiny 177 The Reeves Review: “Building on land rights for the next generation” 179 From intention to action: Seizing the political opportunity 187 The Northern Territory Intervention: Crisis manipulation 198 Conclusion 204 Chapter 8: Conclusion 207 Bibliography 212 Acknowledgements There are many wonderful people who have provided me with support, guidance and encouragement over the course of this research. These brief words of acknowledgement cannot do justice to the valuable role each of them has played in bringing this project to fruition. I have been privileged to work with two very fine supervisors, both eminent in their fields, and each providing quite different perspectives on my work based on their own deep knowledge and academic skill. Allan McConnell has been an unswerving champion of my project from the beginning, and his good humour and cheerful encouragement over the years have been very valuable to me. Allan’s enormous expertise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the Sea of Hands Significant Dates Suggested School Activities
    History of the Sea of Hands Significant Dates Suggested School Activities Sample School Program Worksheets The Sea of Hands is a great activity for students, particularlyThe Sea of if itHands supports is a community work being- baseddone in the Useful Reconciliationclassroom. Some activity schools which have can alsobe used incorporated to mark significant dates during the year, such as Sorry Day, Resources student’s own hand designs and artworks within the Nationalinstallations, Reconciliation enabling Week students and toNAIDOC make aweek. more Photo Gallery personal response to the event. ANTaR QLD can supply hands and poles which can be used free of charge if your school would like to create a Sea of Hands installation. The hands can be booked by phoning the ANTaR office on ph.0401 733359 or via email [email protected] We acknowledge the Turrubal, Jagera and Yuggera people, traditional owners of the land on which Brisbane is situated. About the Sea of Hands Sea of Hands, Canberra 1997 The first Sea of Hands was held on the 12 October 1997, in front of Parliament House, Canberra. The Sea of Hands was created as a powerful, physical representation of the Citizen's Statement on Native Title. The Citizen's Statement was a petition circulated by ANTaR to mobilise non- Indigenous support for native title and reconciliation. Plastic hands in the colours of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags, each one carrying one signature from the Citizen's Statement, were installed in front of Parliament House in what was then the largest public art installation in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • How Torres Strait Islanders Shaped Australia's Border
    11 ‘ESSENTIALLY SEA‑GOING PEOPLE’1 How Torres Strait Islanders shaped Australia’s border Tim Rowse As an Opposition member of parliament in the 1950s and 1960s, Gough Whitlam took a keen interest in Australia’s responsibilities, under the United Nations’ mandate, to develop the Territory of Papua New Guinea until it became a self-determining nation. In a chapter titled ‘International Affairs’, Whitlam proudly recalled his government’s steps towards Papua New Guinea’s independence (declared and recognised on 16 September 1975).2 However, Australia’s relationship with Papua New Guinea in the 1970s could also have been discussed by Whitlam under the heading ‘Indigenous Affairs’ because from 1973 Torres Strait Islanders demanded (and were accorded) a voice in designing the border between Australia and Papua New Guinea. Whitlam’s framing of the border issue as ‘international’, to the neglect of its domestic Indigenous dimension, is an instance of history being written in what Tracey Banivanua- Mar has called an ‘imperial’ mode. Historians, she argues, should ask to what extent decolonisation was merely an ‘imperial’ project: did ‘decolonisation’ not also enable the mobilisation of Indigenous ‘peoples’ to become self-determining in their relationships with other Indigenous 1 H. C. Coombs to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs (Gordon Bryant), 11 April 1973, cited in Dexter, Pandora’s Box, 355. 2 Whitlam, The Whitlam Government, 4, 10, 26, 72, 115, 154, 738. 247 INDIGENOUS SELF-determinatiON IN AUSTRALIA peoples?3 This is what the Torres Strait Islanders did when they asserted their political interests during the negotiation of the Australia–Papua New Guinea border, though you will not learn this from Whitlam’s ‘imperial’ account.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Land Council and Northern Land Council
    CENTRAL LAND COUNCIL and NORTHERN LAND COUNCIL Submission to the Productivity Commission Draft Report into Resources Sector Regulation 21 August 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. KEY TERMS ____________________________________________________________ 4 2. INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 5 PART 1 – DETAILED RESPONSE AND COMMENTARY_________________________ 5 3. LEGAL CONTEXT _______________________________________________________ 5 3.1. ALRA NT ______________________________________________________________ 5 3.2. Native Title Act _________________________________________________________ 6 3.3. The ALRA NT is not alternate to the Native Title Act. __________________________ 6 4. POLICY CONTEXT ______________________________________________________ 6 4.1. Land Council Policy Context ______________________________________________ 6 4.2. Productivity Commission consultation context ________________________________ 8 5. RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS __________________________________ 9 5.1. The EPBC Act, and Northern Territory Environmental Law has recently been subject to specialised review _________________________________________________________ 9 5.2. Pt IV of the ALRA NT has recently been subject to specialised review _____________ 9 5.3. Traditional owners are discrete from the Aboriginal Community and have special rights ____________________________________________________________________ 10 5.4. Free Prior Informed Consent _____________________________________________ 11 5.5. Inaccuracies in the draft Report
    [Show full text]
  • Intimacies of Violence in the Settler Colony Economies of Dispossession Around the Pacific Rim
    Cambridge Imperial & Post-Colonial Studies INTIMACIES OF VIOLENCE IN THE SETTLER COLONY ECONOMIES OF DISPOSSESSION AROUND THE PACIFIC RIM EDITED BY PENELOPE EDMONDS & AMANDA NETTELBECK Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series Series Editors Richard Drayton Department of History King’s College London London, UK Saul Dubow Magdalene College University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK The Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies series is a collection of studies on empires in world history and on the societies and cultures which emerged from colonialism. It includes both transnational, comparative and connective studies, and studies which address where particular regions or nations participate in global phenomena. While in the past the series focused on the British Empire and Commonwealth, in its current incarna- tion there is no imperial system, period of human history or part of the world which lies outside of its compass. While we particularly welcome the first monographs of young researchers, we also seek major studies by more senior scholars, and welcome collections of essays with a strong thematic focus. The series includes work on politics, economics, culture, literature, science, art, medicine, and war. Our aim is to collect the most exciting new scholarship on world history with an imperial theme. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/13937 Penelope Edmonds Amanda Nettelbeck Editors Intimacies of Violence in the Settler Colony Economies of Dispossession around the Pacific Rim Editors Penelope Edmonds Amanda Nettelbeck School of Humanities School of Humanities University of Tasmania University of Adelaide Hobart, TAS, Australia Adelaide, SA, Australia Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series ISBN 978-3-319-76230-2 ISBN 978-3-319-76231-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76231-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018941557 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnography of Health Promotion with Indigenous Australians in South East Queensland
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292140373 "We don't tell people what to do": An ethnography of health promotion with Indigenous Australians in South East Queensland Thesis · December 2015 CITATIONS READS 0 36 1 author: Karen McPhail-Bell University of Sydney 25 PUBLICATIONS 14 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Karen McPhail-Bell Retrieved on: 25 October 2016 “We don’t tell people what to do” An ethnography of health promotion with Indigenous Australians in South East Queensland Karen McPhail-Bell Bachelor of Behavioural Science, Honours (Public Health) Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Public Health and Social Work Queensland University of Technology 2015 Key words Aboriginal, Aboriginal Medical Service, Australia, colonisation, community controlled health service, critical race theory, cultural interface, culture, ethnography, Facebook, government, health promotion, identity, Indigenous, Instagram, mainstream, policy, postcolonial theory, public health, relationship, self- determination, social media, Torres Strait Islander, Twitter, urban, YouTube. ii Abstract Australia is a world-leader in health promotion, consistently ranking in the best performing group of countries for healthy life expectancy and health expenditure per person. However, these successes have largely failed to translate into Indigenous health outcomes. Given the continued dominance of a colonial imagination, little research exists that values Indigenous perspectives, knowledges and practice in health promotion. This thesis contributes to addressing this knowledge gap. An ethnographic study of health promotion practice was undertaken within an Indigenous-led health promotion team, to learn how practitioners negotiated tensions of daily practice.
    [Show full text]
  • VOTES and PROCEEDINGS No
    1978-79-80 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS No. 144 TUESDAY, 19 FEBRUARY 1980 1 The House met, at 2.15 p.m., pursuant to adjournment. Mr Speaker (the Right Honourable Sir Billy Snedden) took the Chair, and read Prayers. 2 DEATHS OF FORMER SENATOR (MR S. K. AMOUR), FORMER SENATOR AND MEMBER (THE HONOURABLE J. A. GUY) AND FORMER MEMBER (SIR WINTON TURNBULL): Mr Speaker informed the House of the deaths of: Mr Stanley Kerin Amour, on 29 November 1979, a Senator for the State of New South Wales from 1938 to 1965; The Honourable James Allan Guy, C.B.E., on 16 December 1979, a Member of this House for the Division of Bass from 1929 to 1934 and the Division of Wilmot from 1940 to 1946, and a Senator for the State of Tasmania from 1950 to 1956, and Sir Winton Turnbull, C.B.E., on 14 January 1980, a Member of this House for the Division of Wimmera from 1946 to 1949 and the Division of Mallee from 1949 to 1972. As a mark of respect to the memory of the deceased all Members present stood, in silence. 3 PETITIONs: The Clerk announced that the following Members had each lodged petitions for presentation, viz.: Mr Aldred, Mr Bourchier, Mr Braithwaite, Mr Bungey, Dr Cass, Mr Howe, Mr Johnston, Mr B. O. Jones, Mr Katter, Mr Lloyd, Mr Lynch, Mr Millar, Mr Peacock, Mr Shipton, Mr Simon and Mr Staley-from certain citizens praying that the National Women's Advisory Council be abolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Julie Bishop and Malcolm Turnbull Took to Twitter to Deny Ben Fordham’S Claims They Had Secret Meeting in Sydney
    Julie Bishop and Malcolm Turnbull took to Twitter to deny Ben Fordham’s claims they had secret meeting in Sydney DAVID MEDDOWS THE DAILY TELEGRAPH FEBRUARY 05, 2015 4:29PM Malcolm Turnbull and Julie Bishop have taken to social media to deny they had planned a secret meeting in Sydney today. Picture: Supplied THE political rumour mill went into overdrive today when a Sydney radio host suggested Julie Bishop and Malcolm Turnbull had arranged a secret meeting in Sydney. 2GB host Fordham took to Twitter this afternoon claiming that Bishop and Turnbull would be meeting at the Communication Minister’s house sometime today. “Interesting fact - @JulieBishopMP and @TurnbullMalcolm have arranged to meet at his Sydney home today,” the Tweet read. But the pair quickly fired back denying the claims. The Communications Minister even provided happy snaps to prove his whereabouts. “you need to improve yr surveillance! I am on the train to Tuggerah. PoliticsinPub Nth Wyong 2nite,” wrote. “No Ben. At 11.30 am I was not meeting w @JulieBishopMP - after a meeting at NBNCo I was waiting for a train at Nth Sydney,” he said. Mr Turnbull was heading to the Central Coast where he was meeting with local MP Karen McNamara. Just to prove his point he posted pictures from the train trip and one hugging a sign at Tuggerah station. “Arrived at our destination! @BenFordham looking forward to discussing broadband with Karen Mcnamara MP,” he said. Still not convinced, Fordham asked one more time for confirmation from Mr Turnbull. “At the risk of coming across as obsessed, can I kindly ask you confirm you did not meet Julie today? *ducks rotten fruit*” he asked on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Malcolm Turnbull's Plotters Find Political Success Elusive
    Malcolm Turnbull's plotters find political success elusive AFR, Aaron Patrick, 22 Aug 2017 Mal Brough vanished. Wyatt Roy sells call centre technology. Peter Hendy wants a Senate seat. James McGrath is in ministerial limbo land. Arthur Sinodinos stays quiet. Scott Ryan is struck out sick. Simon Birmingham is at war with the Catholic Church. Mitch Fifield tried to buy media peace from One Nation. They have been dubbed the G8: the eight Liberals most intimately involved in the successful plot to remove Tony Abbott as prime minister. When they installed Malcolm Turnbull party leader on September 14, 2015, all might have seen their political careers flourishing under what many people expected at the time to be a unifying, inspiring and competent prime minister. Instead, their stories in some ways personify the broader story of the Liberal government: starting with such promise, they have mostly either proved to be disappointments or failed to live up to their early promise. An opinion poll published Monday shows the Labor Party would easily win power based on current voting preferences. Fateful decision When they gathered on the evening of September 13, 2015, at Hendy's home in Queanbeyan, on the outskirts of Canberra, the atmosphere was thick with anticipation. The group, excluding Birmingham, who was flying up from Adelaide, took the fateful decision to remove a first-term leader who had ended six years of Labor power. The next day, Roy, Hendy, Brough, Ryan, Sinodinos and Fifield walked briskly alongside Turnbull to the meeting in Parliament House where they brought down Abbott, triggering open conflict between the two main wings of the party that persists today.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation
    Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee —Supplementary Budget Estimates Hearing—October 2015 Answers to Questions on Notice Parliamentary departments, Department of Parliamentary Services Topic: Cost of Ministerial movements Question: 15 Hansard Reference p 19, 24; 19 October 2015 Date set by the committee for the return of answer: 4 December 2015 Senator WONG: I presume, because you are all assiduous preparers, that people are aware to my questions to the Department of the Senate about the moves associated with the change to the ministry and the Prime Minister. Dr Heriot: Yes. Senator WONG: What information can you give me on that—the costs and what occurred? Dr Heriot: While Mr Ryan is taking his seat at the front, I can tell you that I am advised that there were seven moves of senators, 23 moves of members and 23 moves in the ministry associated with the appointment of a new Prime Minister and his cabinet. We undertake, as suite changes happen, wherever possible routine maintenance, including patching, painting and other minor repairs as necessary. We also have responsibility for changing glass plaque signages as people change their official positions, and I understand that we have done a number of those that I just mentioned as associated with the move. We have done paint and patch repairs. Because they are done by our staff, I am afraid I do not have a cost for you. I can take that on notice as a hypothetical cost. … Senator WONG: Okay. What about the cost of moving—the actual relocation itself, with boxes and a contractor to carry them? How is that managed? Do I wait for Mr Ryan to come back? Dr Heriot: I understand that we do not bear those costs, but I will get confirmation when Mr Ryan is back.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases
    RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney Law School NUMBER 15 AN AIATSIS RESEARCH DISCUSSION PAPER The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney Law School, 173-175 Phillip St, Sydney Research Discussion Paper # 15 First published in 2004 by the Research Section Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies GPO Box 553 Canberra ACT 2601 AIATSIS Research publications co-ordinator: Graeme K Ward Their views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Tory Strait Islander Studies. Copyright ©AIATSIS Apart from any fear dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF AUSTRALIA CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA: Chris Cunneen and Julia Grix The Limitations of Litigation in Stolen Generations Cases ISBN 0 85575 483 4 1. Aboriginal Australians – Children – Government Policy. 2. Aboriginal Australians – Legal status, laws, etc. 3. Aboriginal Australians – Removal. I. Grix, Julia. II. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. III. Title. (Series: Research discussion paper (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies)
    [Show full text]
  • New Name but Same Game for Aboriginal Body Jack Waterford Looks at Progress Made by the Department Set up for Blacks, and Challenges Ahead for the New Commission
    New name but same game for Aboriginal body Jack Waterford looks at progress made by the department set up for blacks, and challenges ahead for the new Commission. Canberra Times 2 March 1990 The Department of Aboriginal Affairs goes out of existence today, to be replaced on Monday by the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission. Few departments have begun with such high aspirations, few have had such humiliating experiences in learning that real change is harder to achieve than to imagine. But, disappointments or not, the department deserves credit for most of the significant advances in Aboriginal affairs over the past 20 years. The department had its origin in the Council for Aboriginal Affairs, established by Harold Holt to advise him on matters Aboriginal in the wake of the 1967 referendum which gave the Commonwealth power to legislate in the area. The size of popular support for the referendum had staggered Mr Holt. The council consisted of Nugget Coombs, the late anthropologist Professor Bill Stanner and former (and future) diplomat Barrie Dexter, the latter heading a small office providing the council with support. Mr Holt's initiative reflected a wide spread feeling that the Commonwealth ought to be doing more in the field, but it would not be true to say that the Common wealth had not been playing a considerable role for years. It had, through the Department of the Interior and its management of Aborigines in the Northern Territory. The problem was that Interior was a Country Party fiefdom with strong assimilationist views. More modern integrationist models were bluntly rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • Children and Young People: the Law and Human Rights (PDF, 199KB)
    Centre for International and Public Law Faculty of Law Australian National University CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE: THE LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS The Hon Alastair Nicholson, AO RFD Chief Justice Family Court of Australia Occasional Paper THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY The Sixteenth SIR RICHARD BLACKBURN LECTURE 14 May 2002 CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE: THE LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS Introduction I am greatly honoured to have been invited to present this year’s address commemorating the enormous and wide-ranging contributions to Australian society made by The Honourable Sir Richard Blackburn OBE. I commend the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory for having initiated this important annual event in 1986 and I feel privileged to follow in the footsteps of the eminent speakers who have given the Lecture since Sir Richard himself delivered the first one. Sir Richard graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Adelaide and Oxford University and a Bachelor of Civil Law degree from Oxford University. He was a Rhodes Scholar for South Australia in 1940 and attended Eldon Law School in 1949. Sir Richard served in the Australian Imperial Forces from 1940 to 1945 and rose to the rank of Captain. In 1949 he was called to the Bar at the Inner Temple in 1949 and he was admitted to practice as a solicitor in South Australia in 1951. His Honour served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory from 1966 to 1971 before his appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory.
    [Show full text]