DOCSLIB.ORG

National Citation Patterns of NEJM, the Lancet, JAMA and the BMJ in the Lay Press: a Quantitative Content Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Citation Patterns of NEJM, the Lancet, JAMA and the BMJ in the Lay Press: a Quantitative Content Analysis Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018705 on 12 November 2017. Downloaded from National citation patterns of NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA and The BMJ in the lay press: a quantitative content analysis Gonzalo Casino,1 Roser Rius,2 Erik Cobo2 To cite: Casino G, Rius R, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Cobo E. National citation Objectives To analyse the total number of newspaper patterns of NEJM, The Lancet, articles citing the four leading general medical journals ► This is the first study that analyses the citations of JAMA and The BMJ in the and to describe national citation patterns. lay press: a quantitative the four leading general medical journals in the lay Design Quantitative content analysis. content analysis. BMJ Open press. Setting/sample Full text of 22 general newspapers in 2017;0:e018705. doi:10.1136/ ► This study shows the existence of a national factor 14 countries over the period 2008–2015, collected from bmjopen-2017-018705 in science communication that needs to be further LexisNexis. The 14 countries have been categorised into monitored and analysed. ► Prepublication history for four regions: the USA, the UK, Western World (European ► Citation and correspondence analyses offer a new this paper is available online. countries other than the UK, and Australia, New Zealand To view these files, please visit way to quantify and monitor the media impact of and Canada) and Rest of the World (other countries). the journal online (http:// dx. doi. scientific journals. Main outcome measure Press citations of four medical org/ 10. 1136/ bmjopen- 2017- ► This study is observational and descriptive; thus, it journals (two American: NEJM and JAMA; and two British: 018705). does not allow direct inference of causality. The Lancet and The BMJ) in 22 newspapers. ► This study is limited in scope, since the 22 Received 15 July 2017 Results British and American newspapers cited some international newspapers from 14 countries as Revised 4 September 2017 of the four analysed medical journals about three times a well as the 4 journals from 2 countries are selected Accepted 14 September 2017 week in 2008–2015 (weekly mean 3.2 and 2.7 citations, according to their relevance; but they are not a respectively); the newspapers from other Western representative random sample of the enormous countries did so about once a week (weekly mean 1.1), diversity of the lay and scientific publications around and those from the Rest of the World cited them about the world. once a month (monthly mean 1.1). The New York Times cited above all other newspapers (weekly mean 4.7). The analysis showed the existence of three national citation http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ patterns in the daily press: American newspapers cited newspapers and that these press citations— mostly American journals (70.0% of citations), British the number of press articles in which the newspapers cited mostly British journals (86.5%) and the name of a specific medical journal is cited— rest of the analysed press cited more British journals than are also important for medical journals,1 since American ones. The Lancet was the most cited journal press citations increase the visibility of papers in the press of almost all Western countries outside the and boost the number of citations in scien- USA and the UK. Multivariate correspondence analysis tific journals.2–5 Therefore, they are an indi- confirmed the national patterns and showed that over 85% cation of relevance and influence, although on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. of the citation data variability is retained in just one single in this case it is social rather than scientific. new variable: the national dimension. For these and other reasons, most leading Conclusion British and American newspapers are 6 the ones that cite the four analysed medical journals medical publications issue press releases. more often, showing a domestic preference for their Despite this relevance, citations in the lay respective national journals; non-British and non-American press have been studied very little, and only a newspapers show a common international citation pattern. few small-scale studies have counted the cita- tions of some medical journals in the press of a single country.1 7 Quantifying how often 1 Department of Communication, INTRODUCTION medical journals are mentioned in the lay Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain Citations of medical journals by other jour- press would provide an estimate of the social 2Department of Statistics and nals included in the Journal Citation Reports impact and influence of those journals and an Operations Research, Universitat are critical for scientific publications. They indicator of the media’s coverage of biomed- Politecnica de Catalunya, are used to calculate the journal impact icine and how relevant medical journalism is Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain factor, which the academic community views in different newspapers and countries. With Correspondence to as a proxy for its scientific relevance and the first objective of answering these ques- Dr Gonzalo Casino; influence. It is important to remember that tions, we performed the first analysis of press gonzalo. casino@ upf. edu medical journals are also cited by general citations of the four leading general medical Casino G, et al. BMJ Open 2017;0:e018705. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018705 1 Open Access BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018705 on 12 November 2017. Downloaded from journals in a set of selected newspapers from countries all RESULTS over the world. Of the 22 analysed newspapers, The New York Times is by A previous study showed that most of the authors of far the one that cited the four analysed medical journals original papers published in NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA more often (weekly mean of 4.7 citations in the period and The BMJ were more frequently affiliated to institu- 2008–2015). Overall, the British and American newspa- tions in the same country as the journal; one exception pers mentioned a journal on average two to three times a was The Lancet, which is the journal with the highest week (weekly mean of 3.2 and 2.7 citations, respectively); proportion of papers from a country other than the the newspapers from the Western World region did so journal.8 We hypothesise that both the nationality of the about once a week (weekly mean of 1.1 citations); and journal and the nationality of the authors who publish the newspapers from the Rest of the World region cited in that journal are related to the number of citations, a journal about once a month (monthly mean of 1.1 cita- and that it is possible to identify some national citation tions) (table 1 and figure 1). patterns in the international lay press. Thus, it may be The Lancet was the most cited journal in the lay press that American and British newspapers have a domestic of almost all analysed Western countries except the USA preference for American or British journals, while other (which favoured NEJM) and the UK and Australia (where newspapers cite The Lancet more, as this journal has been The BMJ ranked first). shown to publish more papers from non-American and The US newspapers cited mostly the US medical jour- non-British authors of medical research.8 Our second nals (2352 citations out of 3360, 70.0%), while the UK objective in collecting this citation data was to study the press cited almost exclusively British journals (3466 cita- relationships (‘correspondences’) between newspapers tions out of 4008, 86.5%). The remaining lay press that and journals (which journals are cited by which news- was analysed cited British journals rather more than papers) and to what extent these might be linked to American, by a ratio of 2 to 1 (3474 citations out of 5450, 63.7%) (figure 2). national patterns. The correspondence analysis performed with the citation data in table 1 provided a two-dimensional plot (figure 3), showing two new calculated orthogonal dimen- METHODS sions that maximise the information retained in terms of We selected the four journals with the highest number of relationships between rows (newspapers) and columns total cites from the 2015 Journal Citation Reports (JCR, (medical journals). In other words, the plot displays the Medicine, General and Internal): NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA relationships between newspapers and medical journals and The BMJ. We then used the LexisNexis database to according to citations data while creating new dimen- sions that independently retains the maximum possible search through the full text of 22 daily newspapers, information. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ seeking any 2008–2015 citations to the four journals. The The plot (figure 3) retains 98.55% of all the citation data newspapers were selected according to four criteria; they variability in table 1: horizontal dimension 1, labelled as had to be written in English, Spanish, French, German or the national dimension, retains 85.42% in new coordinates Italian; considered a national quality newspaper; ranked while the vertical dimension 2 retains 13.13% variability. the highest in circulation in its country and included in British newspapers are closer to the British journals, The LexisNexis during the study period. The selected newspa- Lancet and The BMJ, while the same occurs with American pers are listed in table 1 and classified under four areas of newspapers and journals. The lay press from the Western the world: the USA, the UK, the Western World (Canada, World and the Rest of the World are represented around on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Australia, New Zealand and European countries other the centre of the plot. The new coordinates in dimension than the UK) and the Rest of the World.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stephen P. Lock on "Journalology"
    INSTITUTE FOn SCIENTl FICl NF0F4MAT10N8 3501 MARKET ST PHILADELPHIA PA 19104 Stephen P. Lock on “Journalology” Number 3 January 15, 1990 I don’t remember exactly how long I have Lock: Editor and Scholar known Stephen P. Lock. Our first encounter was probably at a meeting of the Council of Biology Editors (CBE) some 20 years Stephen P. Lock was born in 1929 and re- ago. It is somewhat unsettling to realize that ceived his education at Queen’s College, so much time has gone by. Equally disquiet- Cambridge University, UK, and the Medical ing is the notion that Steve will soon retire College of St. Bartholomew’s Hospital. as editor of the venerable British Medical Trained as a hematologist, he served on the Journal (BMJ). But in the near future Steve staffs of various London teaching hospitals, will indeed step down, having helped train including St. Bartholomew’s and the Hos- his successor, due to be appointed in the fall pital for Sick Children, before being ap- of 1990. pointed assistant editor of BMJ in 1964. It seems odd to refer to Lock as an elder After serving as senior assistant editor and statesman of biomedical editing-however deputy editor, Lock became editor in 1975. accurate that description might be. The word I am amused that Steve opened his talk that comes to mind when I think of Steve with the traditional, mythical reminder about is youth. This youthfidness is reflected in the estimates of the number of extant jour- his writing and in his approach to problems. nals.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletternewsletter Volume 1 ■ Number 41 ■ Decemberapril 2003 2003
    newsletternewsletter Volume 1 ■ Number 41 ■ DecemberApril 2003 2003 Welcome In this Issue FEATURES Dear Colleagues, Scholarly Publishing: 12 Observations on the In the transition from the print to the electronic world, technology has Current Situation and Challenges for descended upon the library like a tsunami. Librarians have labored long the Future ..............................................................2-3 and hard to create and be steered by a clear sense of mission in this new age, rather than simply being swept along by the technological wave. Library Vision of the Future: University of Rochester Libraries — There have been enormous challenges in understanding the potential of Geoff Adams the new technology and how to harness it to a needs-driven environment. Focusing on Users, Hiding Technology ............4 Fundamental questions have even been raised about the very value of traditional libraries in this The Future of Librarianship: A View From a new environment, and librarians continue to wrestle with what their future role in the scientific and School of Library and Information Science ......5-6 academic communities will be. Libraries Look to the Future: As a member of these communities Elsevier is equally affected. This highly dynamic environment Place and Space, Physical and Virtual, presents both great challenges and great opportunities. In the course of the last few years we have Where are Libraries Headed? ................................7 seen production, pricing and packaging models from the print journal world change out of all recognition to accommodate the needs of the new digital environment. We have seen the emergence of e-publishing CENTER OF ATTENTION environments such as PUBMED, JSTOR, and most recently the Open Access movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Offerings Include
    JAMA 2021 Offerings Include: Print Edition Rate Card Effective January 1, 2021 • Patient Page Publication • Selections A supplement of curated articles on a therapeutic topic • Microsites Contact Account Manager for Information Contacts Editor Howard C. Bauchner, MD Boston University School of Medicine Insertion Order or Billing Questions Reprints Denise Steinhauser JAMA, JAMA Cardiology, JAMA Internal Medicine, (312) 464-2455 JAMA Ophthalmology, JAMA Neurology, JAMA Oncology, [email protected] JAMA Psychiatry and JAMA Network Open Marsha Fogler, Account Manager Production Questions JAMA Network Reprint Sales Michael Deegan [email protected] (312) 464-2401 USA: 1-800-482-1450 [email protected] Rest of World: 1-856-489-4446 Please include in the email the specific issue of JAMA in which your ad is running. (Note: JAMA is a weekly.) JAMA Dermatology, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, JAMA Pediatrics, JAMA Surgery, and JAMA Network Open Display + Online Advertising Rachel Sisholtz Pharmaceutical | Device JAMA Network Reprint Sales (862) 261-9600 [email protected] Maureen Reichert USA: 1-800-482-1450 [email protected] Rest of World: 1-856-489-4446 (862) 261-9616 General Inquiries and Non-Profit Organization requests: Nancy Souza JAMA Network Reprints Communications [email protected] [email protected] (862) 261-9615 Requests from non-profit organizations, AMA members, medical Jeff Bonistalli societies, and academic institutions. Director of Advertising Pharmaceutical & Devices [email protected] Health Systems Branding | Products and Service | CME Recruitment Advertising (800) 262-2260 | (312) 464-5909 Fax [email protected] Thalia Moss [email protected] Anna Frazier Director of Advertising Health Systems & Recruitment [email protected] Domestic Subscription Rates (800) 262-2350 Online Site Licensing (312) 464-4371 Page 2 JAMA 2021 Print Edition Rate Card Rates 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Citation Analysis of the Quantitative/Qualitative Methods Debate's Reflection in Sociology Research: Implications for Library Collection Development
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University University Library Faculty Publications Georgia State University Library January 2004 A Citation Analysis of the Quantitative/Qualitative Methods Debate's Reflection in Sociology Research: Implications for Library Collection Development Amanda J. Swygart-Hobaugh M.L.S., Ph.D. Georgia State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/univ_lib_facpub Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Swygart-Hobaugh, A. J. (2004). A citation analysis of the quantitative/qualitative methods debate's reflection in sociology esearr ch: Implications for library collection development. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 28, 180-95. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Georgia State University Library at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Citation Analysis of the Quantitative/Qualitative Methods Debate’s Reflection in Sociology Research: Implications for Library Collection Development Amanda J. Swygart-Hobaugh Consulting Librarian for the Social Sciences Russell D. Cole Library Cornell College 600 First Street West Mt. Vernon, IA 52314-1098 [email protected] NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited
    publications Article How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited Bo-Christer Björk 1,*, Sari Kanto-Karvonen 2 and J. Tuomas Harviainen 2 1 Hanken School of Economics, P.O. Box 479, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland 2 Department of Information Studies and Interactive Media, Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere, Finland; Sari.Kanto@ilmarinen.fi (S.K.-K.); tuomas.harviainen@tuni.fi (J.T.H.) * Correspondence: bo-christer.bjork@hanken.fi Received: 19 February 2020; Accepted: 24 March 2020; Published: 26 March 2020 Abstract: Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author payments. In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in such journals in 2014 and found an average of 2.6 citations per article, and that 56% of the articles had no citations at all. For comparison, a random sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals included in the Scopus index had an average of 18, 1 citations in the same period with only 9% receiving no citations.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Covid-19 Elimination
    EDITORIALS Department of Preventive and Social BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.n1794 on 15 July 2021. Downloaded from Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Defining covid-19 elimination New Zealand Correspondence to: D C G Skegg Elimination is achievable and should not be confused with eradication [email protected] Cite this as: BMJ 2021;374:n1794 David CG Skegg, Philip C Hill http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1794 Speaking about progress towards ending the covid-19 “zero covid” for a prolonged period. Even with border Published: 15 July 2021 epidemic in the United States, Anthony Fauci said: restrictions and strict quarantine, incursions of the “We will end the epidemic phase, and we will likely virus occur from time to time, leading to clusters of get somewhere between control and elimination, infections and occasional large outbreaks. In the more likely closer to control.”1 Now authorities in Australian state of Victoria, for example, a resurgence England are abandoning most efforts to control, let of covid-19 last year peaked at over 700 cases a day, alone eliminate, the infection.2 Throughout the before being extinguished after three months.11 pandemic, the word “elimination” has been used in Despite such setbacks, Australia and New Zealand different senses. Many confuse elimination with remain healthy economies with largely normal eradication, which normally means permanent community life, apart from temporary border reduction to zero of the worldwide incidence of an restrictions. Both are developing plans for a phased infection—as was achieved for smallpox.3 This reopening of borders. confusion helps to make the idea of eliminating The likely consequences of not aiming for elimination covid-19 seem impossible and not worth pursuing.
    [Show full text]
  • 5455 Wilshire Blvd, #806 . Los Angeles, CA
    September 1, 2016 Erik Engstrom CEO, RELX Group 1-3 Strand London, WC2N 5JR, UK RE: ME/CFS coverage in your publication, The Lancet Dear Mr. Engstrom, On behalf of the Solve ME/CFS Initiative and as a patient with Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), commonly known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), I am writing to bring your attention to a matter of vital importance to the ME/CFS community, the PACE Trials and your publication, The Lancet. I am writing to ask that you continue the good name and reputation of The Lancet within the ME/CFS scientific community by facilitating an open discussion of the PACE trials and committing to publish an independent review of the trial data now that a First- Tier Tribunal has ordered the data to be released. As you may know, ME/CFS is a complex, neuro-immune disease with no known cause, treatment, diagnostic tool, nor cure. It is estimated that up to 20 million people worldwide are stricken with ME/CFS from ages 10 to 80 of any race, gender, or socio- economic class and this disease leaves its patients with lower quality of life scores than lung cancer, stroke, and rheumatoid arthritis. (Source: Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness IOM 2015 And, The Health- Related Quality of Life for Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132421.Published online 2015 Jul 6.) The PACE Trials concluded, in contrast to over 4,000 other scientific publications, that this disease was psychological in nature. The Pace Trial evaluated a series of treatments which it claimed was successful in helping patients with ME/CFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Policies of Leading Medical Journals: a Cross-Sectional Study
    Open access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028655 on 20 June 2019. Downloaded from Open access policies of leading medical journals: a cross-sectional study Tim S Ellison, 1 Tim Koder, 2 Laura Schmidt, 2 Amy Williams, 1 Christopher C Winchester 2 To cite: Ellison TS, Koder T, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Schmidt L, et al. Open Objectives Academical and not-for-profit research access policies of leading funders are increasingly requiring that the research they ► This manuscript includes a cross-sectional analysis medical journals: a cross- fund must be published open access, with some insisting sectional study. BMJ Open of open access policies of medical journals with a on publishing with a Creative Commons Attribution (CC 2019;9:e028655. doi:10.1136/ high impact factor, including society-owned jour- BY) licence to allow the broadest possible use. We aimed bmjopen-2018-028655 nals, from multiple publishers. to clarify the open access variants provided by leading ► The open access policies of all journals analysed ► Prepublication history medical journals and record the availability of the CC BY were clarified, and confirmation of our findings and additional material for licence for commercially funded research. was received by email from 97% of the contacted this paper are available Methods We identified medical journals with a 2015 online. To view these files, journals. impact factor of ≥15.0 on 24 May 2017, then excluded please visit the journal online ► Open access policies of the journals and publishers from the analysis journals that only publish review articles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal Impact Factor Denominator Defining Citable (Counted) Items
    COMMENTARIES The Journal Impact Factor Denominator Defining Citable (Counted) Items Marie E. McVeigh, MS The items counted in the denominator of the impact fac- tor are identifiable in the Web of Science database by hav- Stephen J. Mann ing the index field document type set as “Article,” “Re- view,” or “Proceedings Paper” (a specialized subset of the VER ITS 30-YEAR HISTORY, THE JOURNAL IMPACT article document type). These document types identify the factor has been the subject of much discussion scholarly contribution of the journal to the literature and and debate.1 From its first release in 1975, bib- are counted as “citable items” in the denominator of the im- liometricians and library scientists discussed its pact factor. A journal accepted for coverage in the Thom- Ovalue and its vagaries. In the last decade, discussion has 6 son Reuters citation database is reviewed by experts who shifted to the way in which impact factor data are used. In consider the bibliographic and bibliometric characteristics an environment eager for objective measures of productiv- of all article types published by that journal (eg, items), which ity, relevance, and research value, the impact factor has been are covered by that journal in the context of other materi- applied broadly and indiscriminately.2,3 The impact factor als in the journal, the subject, and the database as a whole. has gone from being a measure of a journal’s citation influ- This journal-specific analysis identifies the journal sec- ence in the broader literature to a surrogate that assesses tions, subsections, or both that contain materials likely to the scholarly value of work published in that journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Web of Science Benefits
    Thomson.com Web of Science® What it offers. Why it matters to you. What Web of Science delivers How your work will benefit Content is the cornerstone For decades, the Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI) The result of this ongoing collection development? Excellence Editorial Development group has carefully Quality by default. without evaluated journals for potential inclusion in the excess database. Your search results will include only accurate, reliable, —— relevant data. You'll get not just more hits, but more The objective is to include only the most quality hits. You'll get the influential, relevant, and credible journal right answers, information available. If you publish — You'll easily find high impact quicker articles upon which to base your articles — increasing The criteria are detailed, unbiased, and time- the quality and credibility of your published work, tested — examining basic publishing standards, resulting in more publication in more prestigious timeliness, editorial scope and objectives, and sources. citation analyses. If you research — You'll be able to quickly identify The process is "publisher-neutral" — commercial, potential collaborators with prolific, significant citation open access, society, and university publishers are records. And tracking your own citation record will treated equally. help you demonstrate your work's impact on your field. Every publication indexed within Web of Science has passed through this rigorous evaluation If you teach — Your students will be assured of using process. the highest quality resources — finding valuable information in journals they may not have the knowledge and experience to seek on their own. It's a fact ... As of March 2006, the total number of Web of Science records is approximately 37 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Babes and Boobs? Analysis of JAMA Cover Art Jocalyn P Clark
    Papers BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.319.7225.1603 on 18 December 1999. Downloaded from Babes and boobs? Analysis of JAMA cover art Jocalyn P Clark Abstract Of the 15 covers depicting women, 12 included Department of babies and six showed nudity. In contrast, only one Public Health Objective To determine the representation of the Sciences, University male image included a child and none contained of Toronto, Toronto, sexes in JAMA cover art. nudity. In the cover depicting a man with a child, the Canada M5S 1A8 doctoral candidate Design Review of 50 consecutive issues. man is not the child’s father but its doctor. Babes and Setting JAMA, March 1997-March 1998. boobs were featured in 12 of the 50 covers. Correspondence to: Main outcome measures Numbers and nature of J P Clark, Centre for Research in covers portraying men and women. Women’s Health, Results Of the 50 covers, 34 depicted humans. 15 Conclusions Toronto, Canada depicted women, 13 men, and 6 were of mixed or M5G 1N8 Visual imagery associated with medical journals shapes [email protected] indeterminate sex. 11 pictures of women included a our understanding of health and the human body. child and five included nudity. One cover showed a Images of babes and boobs in cover art emphasise BMJ 1999;319:1603–5 man with a child (not as a father) and none depicted women’s sexual and domestic roles, representing nudity. Men were depicted exclusively in authoritative women in traditional and stereotypical ways that under- roles. mine contemporary beliefs in the equality, autonomy, Conclusions Much of the cover art gives strong and status of women.34 These representations do not messages about sexual stereotypes that are reflect women’s contributions to the domains of science, inappropriate in modern society.
    [Show full text]
  • ACADEMIC 1 Improving Healthcare Outcomes
    Sharing knowledge and expertise ACADEMIC 1 Improving healthcare outcomes Sharing the newest ideas, opinions and data Supporting health professionals’ learning and development Developing tools to make information accessible and useful Using digital technology to make best evidence instantly available That’s what BMJ does. We’ve been doing it since 1840. 2 A healthier world Since starting out as the publisher of a single “We have a clear vision of ‘A Healthier World’ medical journal in 1840, we have developed a and use our values to inform the decisions unique range of capabilities to meet the needs professionals, institutions and organisations. we take to help achieve that vision. The voice of our customers is vitally • Leading source of medical information for over important to us - we listen and respond 170 years to their needs, ensuring we provide high- • The BMJ is the fourth most cited general quality evidence based products for medical journal in the world healthcare professionals, their institutions, • Each month, more than five million users visit organisations and governments.” our websites, where we have content available in 11 languages • Over 700,000 healthcare professionals from Peter Ashman more than 100 countries access our revision CEO, BMJ resources and online learning tools [email protected] bmj.com/company 3 Global healthcare knowledge provider BMJ shares knowledge and expertise to improve experiences, outcomes and value. From specialist publications and decision support to online learning, our products and services help improve the educational development of students and professionals. They also help organisations improve their research and development services. Alert Drive research to publication Receive customisable emails containing Help improve research outputs and interest-related content.
    [Show full text]