DOCSLIB.ORG

Bug Seeding: a Possible Jump-Start to Stream Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery June 2020 Alternate Formats Available 206-477-4800 TTY Relay: 711 Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery Prepared for: Washington State Department of Ecology Submitted by: Kate Macneale King County Water and Land Resources Division Department of Natural Resources and Parks Funded in part by: WA State Department of Ecology and US Environmental Protection Agency WQNEP-2017-KCWLRD-00027 Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many people who made this work possible. A special thanks goes to Katherine Lynch of Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), Kit Paulsen of the City of Bellevue, Chipper Maney of the Port of Seattle, Matt Goehring of King County Water and Land Resources Division (WLRD), and Connie Blumen of King County Parks and Recreation Division for their support and their help to coordinate site access. We would also like to thank Dave Beedle and Amy LaBarge of SPU for their help to facilitate access to sites in the Cedar River Watershed. In addition, we are grateful to Sarah Morley and Linda Rhodes of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center for helpful discussions about invasive species, pathogens and minimizing translocation risks. Finally, we thank the tireless WLRD field crew who helped transport literally tons of rocks and tens of thousands of invertebrates. They include Liora Llewellyn, Beth Sosik, Mark Quick, Mimi Reed, Jessica Andrade, Houston Flores, Andre Griggs, Christopher Barnes, KayLani Siplin and Stephanie Eckard. In addition to hauling rocks, Liora was especially helpful in preparing maps and coordinating logistics for the project. We would like to thank Lola Flores of the Washington State Department of Ecology for administering the grant, and the Puget Sound Partnership for facilitating the grant program. The manuscript was improved by helpful comments from Beth Sosik, Deb Lester, Dave White, Tom Ventur, Saffa Bardaro, Josh Baldi, Gary Myers, Chad Larson, and Keunyea Song. Cover photo: A stonefly, Pteronarcys princeps, found in Gold Creek a year after seeding. Photo credit: Kate Macneale This project has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement 01J18101 to King County. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Citation King County. 2020. Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery. Prepared by Kate Macneale, Water and Land Resources Division. Seattle, Washington. King County Science and Technical Support Section i June 2020 Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery Table of Contents Executive Summary............................................................................................................................................. iv 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study rationale and objectives ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study area ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 Seeding methods ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Basket deployment ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Basket retrieval and transport ..................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Assessing diversity at recipient sites pre- and post-seeding ...............................................10 3.1 Establishing which taxa were present in the recipient streams before seeding .................................................................................................................................................10 3.2 Determining which taxa were added and which taxa persisted ....................................11 3.3 Determining if new taxa will affect B-IBI scores ..................................................................13 4.0 Results after one year post-seeding ..............................................................................................15 4.1 Gold Creek ...........................................................................................................................................15 4.2 Taylor Creek .......................................................................................................................................18 4.3 Yarrow Creek Tributary ................................................................................................................21 4.4 Miller Creek ........................................................................................................................................23 5.0 Conclusions and future recommendations .................................................................................25 6.0 References ...............................................................................................................................................27 Figures Study sites and other B-IBI sites throughout the region. B-IBI sites are categorized (very poor to excellent) based on their average score from samples collected in 2016 and 2017. ................................................................................... 4 Median B-IBI scores at sites across Puget Sound, and mean scores at recipient sites pre-seeding (2012-2018).. .......................................................................... 5 Staff deploying colonization baskets in Webster Creek on July 16, 2018. ............. 7 Staff retrieving a colonization basket from Webster Creek on September 4, 2018. ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Decision framework used to determine if taxa found in recipient streams post-seeding were new, or possibly new to a site. ........................................................12 King County Science and Technical Support Section ii June 2020 Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery Median B-IBI scores at sites across Puget Sound, and scores at recipient sites, pre (2012-2018) and post (2019) seeding.. .........................................................15 B-IBI scores for Gold Creek samples, collected pre-seeding from 2012 – 2018 (n=7) and one year post-seeding in 2019 (n=1). ...............................................16 Metric scores forGold Creek samples, pre-seeding (2012-2018, n=7) and post-seeding (2019; n=1). ......................................................................................................17 The B-IBI scores for Taylor Creek samples, collected pre-seeding from 2012 – 2018 (n=7) and one year post-seeding in 2019 (n =1). ..........................................19 Metric scores for Taylor Creek samples, pre-seeding (2012-2018, n=7) and post-seeding (2019) (n=1). ....................................................................................................20 The B-IBI scores for Yarrow Creek tributary samples, collected pre-seeding from 2013 – 2018 (n=3) and one year post-seeding in 2019 (n=1). .....................22 Metric scores for Yarrow Creek tributary samples, pre-seeding (2013-2018, n=3) and post-seeding (2019; n=1). ...................................................................................22 The B-IBI scores for Miller Creek samples, collected pre-seeding from 2012-2018 (n=7) and one year post-seeding in 2019 (n=1). ...................................23 Metric scores for Miller Creek samples, pre-seeding (2012-2018, n=7) and post-seeding (2019; n=1). ......................................................................................................24 Tables Study site locations...................................................................................................................... 3 Number of sites, years of record, and number of samples reviewed to identify unique taxa associated with each stream prior to seeding. ......................10 Number of taxa added to each recipient stream that would be considered new, possibly new, or not new if found in 2019, based on framework outlined in Figure 5. ..................................................................................................................13 PSSB site codes for sites included in review of taxonomic diversity in each recipient stream prior to seeding. ......................................................................................... 1 Appendices Appendix A: Site Codes Appendix B: Taxa Added to Recipient Streams and Determination of Status King County Science and Technical Support Section iii June 2020 Bug Seeding: A Possible Jump-start to Stream Recovery EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The “bug seeding” project aimed to jump-start the ecological recovery of several historically degraded King County streams by seeding them with a diverse community of macroinvertebrates – or “stream bugs” – from healthy streams. This work was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a Near Term Action to support
Recommended publications
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event

    The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
  • Chironomidae Hirschkopf

    Chironomidae Hirschkopf

    Literatur Chironomidae Gesäuse U.A. zur Bestimmung und Ermittlung der Autökologie herangezogene Literatur: Albu, P. (1972): Două specii de Chironomide noi pentru ştiinţă în masivul Retezat.- St. şi Cerc. Biol., Seria Zoologie, 24: 15-20. Andersen, T.; Mendes, H.F. (2002): Neotropical and Mexican Mesosmittia Brundin, with the description of four new species (Insecta, Diptera, Chironomidae).- Spixiana, 25(2): 141-155. Andersen, T.; Sæther, O.A. (1993): Lerheimia, a new genus of Orthocladiinae from Africa (Diptera: Chironomidae).- Spixiana, 16: 105-112. Andersen, T.; Sæther, O.A.; Mendes, H.F. (2010): Neotropical Allocladius Kieffer, 1913 and Pseudosmittia Edwards, 1932 (Diptera: Chironomidae).- Zootaxa, 2472: 1-77. Baranov, V.A. (2011): New and rare species of Orthocladiinae (Diptera, Chironomidae) from the Crimea, Ukraine.- Vestnik zoologii, 45(5): 405-410. Boggero, A.; Zaupa, S.; Rossaro, B. (2014): Pseudosmittia fabioi sp. n., a new species from Sardinia (Diptera: Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae).- Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, [S.l.],46(1): 1-5. Brundin, L. (1947): Zur Kenntnis der schwedischen Chironomiden.- Arkiv för Zoologi, 39 A(3): 1- 95. Brundin, L. (1956): Zur Systematik der Orthocladiinae (Dipt. Chironomidae).- Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Drottningholm 37: 5-185. Casas, J.J.; Laville, H. (1990): Micropsectra seguyi, n. sp. du groupe attenuata Reiss (Diptera: Chironomidae) de la Sierra Nevada (Espagne).- Annls Soc. ent. Fr. (N.S.), 26(3): 421-425. Caspers, N. (1983): Chironomiden-Emergenz zweier Lunzer Bäche, 1972.- Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 65: 484-549. Caspers, N. (1987): Chaetocladius insolitus sp. n. (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Lunz, Austria. In: Saether, O.A. (Ed.): A conspectus of contemporary studies in Chironomidae (Diptera).
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Benton Lake National Wildlife

    Comprehensive Conservation Plan Benton Lake National Wildlife

    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas breeding habitat—Environment used by migratory and activities for people of different abilities, es- birds or other animals during the breeding sea- pecially those with physical impairments. son. A.D.—Anno Domini, “in the year of the Lord.” canopy—Layer of foliage, generally the uppermost adaptive resource management (ARM)—The rigorous layer, in a vegetative stand; mid-level or under- application of management, research, and moni- story vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy toring to gain information and experience neces- closure (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the sary to assess and change management activities. amount of overhead vegetative cover. It is a process that uses feedback from research, CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. monitoring, and evaluation of management ac- CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. tions to support or change objectives and strate- CO2—Carbon dioxide. gies at all planning levels. It is also a process in Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—Codification of which the Service carries out policy decisions the general and permanent rules published in the within a framework of scientifically driven ex- Federal Register by the Executive departments periments to test predictions and assumptions and agencies of the Federal Government. Each inherent in management plans. Analysis of re- volume of the CFR is updated once each calendar sults helps managers decide whether current year. management should continue as is or whether it compact—Montana House bill 717–Bill to Ratify should be modified to achieve desired conditions. Water Rights Compact. alternative—Reasonable way to solve an identi- compatibility determination—See compatible use.
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
  • Table of Contents 2

    Table of Contents 2

    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
  • Bibliograp Bibliography

    Bibliograp Bibliography

    BIBLIOGRAPHY 9.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 Adam, J.I & O.A. Sæther. 1999. Revision of the records for the southern United States genus Nilothauma Kieffer, 1921 (Diptera: (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Ga. Ent. Soc. Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 56: 1- 15:69-73. 107. Beck, W.M., Jr. & E.C. Beck. 1966. Chironomidae Ali, A. 1991. Perspectives on management of pest- (Diptera) of Florida - I. Pentaneurini (Tany- iferous Chironomidae (Diptera), an emerg- podinae). Bull. Fla. St. Mus. Biol. Sci. ing global problem. J. Am. Mosq. Control 10:305-379. Assoc. 7: 260-281. Beck, W.M., Jr., & E.C. Beck. 1970. The immature Armitage, P., P.S. Cranston & L.C.V. Pinder (eds). stages of some Chironomini (Chiro- 1995. The Chironomidae. Biology and nomidae). Q.J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 33:29-42. ecology of non-biting midges. Chapman & Bilyj, B. 1984. Descriptions of two new species of Hall, London. 572 pp. Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Ashe, P. 1983. A catalogue of chironomid genera Southern Indian Lake, Canada. Can. J. Fish. and subgenera of the world including syn- Aquat. Sci. 41: 659-671. onyms (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. Bilyj, B. 1985. New placement of Tanypus pallens scand. Suppl. 17: 1-68. Coquillett, 1902 nec Larsia pallens (Coq.) Barton, D.R., D.R. Oliver & M.E. Dillon. 1993. sensu Roback 1971 (Diptera: Chironomi- The first Nearctic record of Stackelbergina dae) and redescription of the holotype. Can. Shilova and Zelentsov (Diptera: Chironomi- Ent. 117: 39-42. dae): Taxonomic and ecological observations. Bilyj, B. 1988. A taxonomic review of Guttipelopia Aquatic Insects 15: 57-63. (Diptera: Chironomidae).
  • This Table Contains a Taxonomic List of Benthic Invertebrates Collected from Streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Study

    This Table Contains a Taxonomic List of Benthic Invertebrates Collected from Streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Study

    This table contains a taxonomic list of benthic invertebrates collected from streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin study unit as part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessemnt (NAWQA) Program. Invertebrates were collected from woody snags in selected streams from 1996-2004. Data Retreival occurred 26-JAN-06 11.10.25 AM from the USGS data warehouse (Taxonomic List Invert http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/data). The data warehouse currently contains invertebrate data through 09/30/2002. Invertebrate taxa can include provisional and conditional identifications. For more information about invertebrate sample processing and taxonomic standards see, "Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory -- Processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples", at << http://nwql.usgs.gov/Public/pubs/OFR00-212.html >>. Data Retrieval Precaution: Extreme caution must be exercised when comparing taxonomic lists generated using different search criteria. This is because the number of samples represented by each taxa list will vary depending on the geographic criteria selected for the retrievals. In addition, species lists retrieved at different times using the same criteria may differ because: (1) the taxonomic nomenclature (names) were updated, and/or (2) new samples containing new taxa may Phylum Class Order Family Subfamily Tribe Genus Species Taxon Porifera Porifera Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydridae Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydra Hydra sp. Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Turbellaria Nematoda Nematoda Bryozoa Bryozoa Mollusca Gastropoda Gastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Mesogastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Campeloma Campeloma sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Viviparus Viviparus sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Hydrobiidae Hydrobiidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ancylidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ferrissia Ferrissia sp.
  • CHIRONOMUS NEWSLETTER on CHIRONOMIDAE RESEARCH Co-Editors: Ruth CONTRERAS-LICHTENBERG Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, A-1014 WIEN, Austria Peter H

    CHIRONOMUS NEWSLETTER on CHIRONOMIDAE RESEARCH Co-Editors: Ruth CONTRERAS-LICHTENBERG Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, A-1014 WIEN, Austria Peter H

    CHIRONOMUS NEWSLETTER ON CHIRONOMIDAE RESEARCH Co-Editors: Ruth CONTRERAS-LICHTENBERG Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, A-1014 WIEN, Austria Peter H. LANGTON 5 Kylebeg Avenue, Mountsandel, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland, BT52 1JN - Northern Ireland Bibliography: Odwin HOFFRICHTER Institut f. Biologie I, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstrasse 1 D-79104 , Germany Treasurer: Trond ANDERSEN: Museum of Zoology, University of Bergen, Museplass 3, N-5007 Bergen - Norway ISSN 0172-1941 No. 13 September 2000 CONTENTS Chironomid Work in Munich to Continue ............................................................................................................... 1 New curator at the Zoologische Staatssammlung Munich ...................................................................................... 2 Contributions in SPIXIANA in Memory of Dr. Reiss.............................................................................................. 4 To Iya Kiknadze at 70................................................................................................................................................ 5 Current Research ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Short – Communications ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Notice Board ...................................................................................................................................
  • (DIPTERA) FAUNA from the UPPER ISKAR RIVER CATCHMENT (BULGARIA) – SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION and ECOLOGICAL NOTES Dimitriy Dashinov

    (DIPTERA) FAUNA from the UPPER ISKAR RIVER CATCHMENT (BULGARIA) – SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION and ECOLOGICAL NOTES Dimitriy Dashinov

    Supplement 1 Ecological Engineering and Environment Protection, IX, 2017, p. 16-21 NEW DATA ON THE CHIRONOMIDAE (DIPTERA) FAUNA FROM THE UPPER ISKAR RIVER CATCHMENT (BULGARIA) – SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGICAL NOTES Dimitriy Dashinov Abstract: The Chironomid composition was studied in 23 sites from 12 rivers along the upper part of the Iskar River catchment (Danube basin). Samples were gathered using Surber sampler in the summer period of 2015-2016. A total of 54 taxa (from 39 genera and 5 subfamilies) were identified from which 33 taxa were new for the upper Iskar River catchment. Two species were new for Bulgaria: Potthastia montium (Edwards, 1929) and Symbiocladius rhithrogenae (Zavrel, 1924). Two taxa belonged to genera not reported for the Bulgarian fauna – Cryptotendipes sp. and Sympotthastia sp. For most of the rivers the chiro abundance was relatively low with a mean of 60 ind.m-2, which is about 12% of the marozoobenthos community. Key words: Chironomidae, Iskar, Potthastia montium, Symbiocladius rhithrogenae, new records INTRODUCTION The period of sampling was in July - August 2015 and 2016. An overall macrozoobenthos sample On the Chironomidae fauna there is overall data was taken from each site using Surber sampler, for the whole Iskar River [5] [11] as well as from sections according to the adapted for Bulgaria version of the upstream and downstream of Sofia [17]. Along the multi-habitat sampling method [3]. The collected upper Iskar catchment studies of the Chironomidae samples were preserved in 70% alcohol and stored family are few. There is more data on the glacial lakes in the laboratory for further analysis.
  • The Role of Chironomidae in Separating Naturally Poor from Disturbed Communities

    The Role of Chironomidae in Separating Naturally Poor from Disturbed Communities

    From taxonomy to multiple-trait bioassessment: the role of Chironomidae in separating naturally poor from disturbed communities Da taxonomia à abordagem baseada nos multiatributos dos taxa: função dos Chironomidae na separação de comunidades naturalmente pobres das antropogenicamente perturbadas Sónia Raquel Quinás Serra Tese de doutoramento em Biociências, ramo de especialização Ecologia de Bacias Hidrográficas, orientada pela Doutora Maria João Feio, pelo Doutor Manuel Augusto Simões Graça e pelo Doutor Sylvain Dolédec e apresentada ao Departamento de Ciências da Vida da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra. Agosto de 2016 This thesis was made under the Agreement for joint supervision of doctoral studies leading to the award of a dual doctoral degree. This agreement was celebrated between partner institutions from two countries (Portugal and France) and the Ph.D. student. The two Universities involved were: And This thesis was supported by: Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), financing program: ‘Programa Operacional Potencial Humano/Fundo Social Europeu’ (POPH/FSE): through an individual scholarship for the PhD student with reference: SFRH/BD/80188/2011 And MARE-UC – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre. University of Coimbra, Portugal: CNRS, UMR 5023 - LEHNA, Laboratoire d'Ecologie des Hydrosystèmes Naturels et Anthropisés, University Lyon1, France: Aos meus amados pais, sempre os melhores e mais dedicados amigos Table of contents: ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • WORK SESSION AGENDA 1. Call to Order 5:30 P.M. 2. Planning

    WORK SESSION AGENDA 1. Call to Order 5:30 P.M. 2. Planning

    HOMER ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 2014 491 E PIONEER AVENUE 5:30 WEDNESDAY HOMER, ALASKA COWLES COUNCIL CHAMBERS WORK SESSION AGENDA 1. Call to Order 5:30 p.m. 2. Planning Commission work list for 2015 pg. 1 3. Discussion of Items on the Regular Meeting Agenda 4. Public Comments The public may speak to the Planning Commission regarding matters on the work session agenda that are not scheduled for public hearing or plat consideration. (3 minute time limit). 5. Commission Comments 6. Adjournment HAPC Draft 2015 Work list – 11/5/14 1. Stormwater – performance standards, what storm even to plan for, design criteria manual for road construction. What did Soldotna do near river? Rick to research based on CC work session. 2. Subdivision/Roads standards - major review of subdivision rules with attention to green infrastructure, road construction and drainage standards. 3. Chapter 4 Comp Plan review - Rick 4. Transportation Plan/HNMTTP/1986 Master Streets and Roads Plan update ?? ?? Upcoming Issues, will be brought forward by staff: • Towers – CC work session in October. Result: Use middle ground approach: no inspections, but safety and spatial characteristics. View shed is a concern but may not be something we can regulate… • FEMA map update – staff will bring this forward when its ready. • Subdivision ord – the housekeeping version! Need update title 22 with new processes for HAPC required by KPB code changes. This is not a major redo; its about public notice requirements, etc. • Transportation Advisory Committee duties (this is generally small, that’s why the committee is disbanded. The road standards/subdivision/design criteria manual are the real meat and potatoes here, see #2 above).