DOCSLIB.ORG

Gulf Plains Bioregion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gulf Plains Bioregion Gulf Plains bioregion Description Figure 2 Monitoring data coverage Area: 121 100 km2 The Gulf Plains bioregion is characterised by extensive NT alluvial plains and coastal areas. The tropical savanna vegetation comprises mainly eucalypt and tea-tree open woodlands. The regional economy is mainly based on cattle grazing with some prawn fishing, QLD mining and tourism. Tenure is pastoral lease, Aboriginal land and nature reserves. Major population centres are Burketown, Normanton, Karumba and Doomadgee Aboriginal Community. bioregion and sub-IBRA boundary RMDC AussieGRASS data Location The Gulf Plains bioregion is located in the Gulf of Data sourcesMoni availabletoring data coverage Carpentaria in northern Queensland, with a small Data sources include: area (0.7% of bioregion area) in the Northern Territory (NT; see Figures 1 and 2). n Rapid Mobile Data Collection (RMDC) supported by AussieGRASS simulation (of pasture growth Figure 1 Location of the Gulf Plains and utilisation) and remote sensing (Multiple bioregion Regression Bare Ground Index, version bi1); these provide moderate reliability for reporting change (RMDC — road traverses and visual estimates; AussieGRASS — entire rangelands, simulated results with some ground validation) n domestic stocking density, which provides moderate reliability n fire extent, intensity and frequency, which provides high reliability n dust n distance from water n distribution and relative abundance of invasive animals and weeds Location of Gulf Plains bioregion n land use n land values. Gulf Plains bioregion 1 Climate Sustainable management The Gulf Plains bioregion has a monsoonal climate Critical stock forage with a winter dry season and a summer wet season. Spatially averaged median (1890–2005) rainfall is AussieGRASS, levels of simulated pasture 737 mm (April to March rainfall year; see Figure 3). utilisation and change Figure 3 Decile rainfall for the period The Donors Plateau sub-IBRA had space- and time- 1991–1992 to 2004–2005 averaged pasture utilisation for the 1991–2005 period 10 considerably above that considered a level of safe 9 utilisation for the Gulf Plains bioregion. Eight of the 8 7 remaining nine sub-IBRAs were rated marginal for 6 median sustainability (ie simulated utilisation was close to, and 5 4 more likely just above, the safe level). The Wellesley 3 Islands was the one exception where simulated Rainfall decile 2 1 utilisation was well below the threshold. 0 1991-92 1993-94 1995-96 1997-98 1999-00 2001-02 2003-04 Utilisation decreased by 2–4% in absolute terms Rainfall year between 1976–1990 and 1991–2005 on three Annual rainfall is for the 12-month period 1 April sub-IBRAs (Donors Plateau, Armraynald Plains and to 31 March. Woondoola Plains). This was an encouraging sign for pasture sustainability. There was little change in Decile rainfall was variable throughout the reporting utilisation elsewhere. period. The year 1991–1992 was very dry while 1998–1999 to 2000–2001 and 2003–2004 were Plant species richness notably wet periods. There are no suitable data for reporting change The intense nature of monsoonal and cyclonic in plant species richness. rainfall probably means that the spatially averaged rainfall reported here conceals local variability in Change in woody cover yearly rainfall across the Gulf Plains bioregion. Statewide Landcover and Trees Study (SLATS) reporting Landscape function Six of the ten sub-IBRAs have substantial woody cover (greater than 70%). In comparison, the Woondoola RMDC, change in visually assessed Plains, Armraynald Plains and Kurumba Plains sub- IBRAs are relatively ‘open’, with 2003 woody cover vegetation and soil attributes levels of 11.15% to 25.30%. There was very little contributing to landscape change in woody cover for any sub-IBRA between function score 1991 and 2003. There is high reliability for reporting Four sub-Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for change in woody cover. Australia (IBRA) regions showed either some loss or significant loss of function (significant loss for the Distance from stock water Armraynald Plains and Doomadgee Plains, some loss Based on the locations of stock waterpoints sourced for the Donors Plateau and Mitchell Gilbert Fans). The from Geoscience Australia’s GEODATA TOPO 250K Woondoola Plains sub-IBRA was considered stable. vector product (Series 3, June 2006), the percentage RMDC data were insufficient to report for five other area within three kilometres of permanent and semi- IBRAs (Claraville Plains, Gilberton Plateau, Holroyd permanent sources of stock water for each sub-IBRA is: Plain — Red Plateau, Karumba Plains and Wellesley Islands). AussieGRASS simulation suggested these areas had stable landscape function. 2 Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse Karumba Plains (GUP1) 7.1% Components of total Armraynald Plains (GUP2) 42.5% grazing pressure Woondoola Plains (GUP3) 38.8% Mitchell — Gilbert Fans (GUP4) 7.5% Domestic stocking density Claraville Plains (GUP5) 22.7% Most (93%) of the Gulf Plains bioregion is grazed. Holroyd Plain — Red Plateau (GUP6) 9.3% Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Doomadgee Plains (GUP7) 6.8% showed that stocking density gradually increased Donors Plateau (GUP8) 37.0% from 7% below the 1983–1991 average in 1992 Gilberton Plateau (GUP9) 10.5% to equal the average in 1998. Stocking density then Wellesley Islands (GUP10) 5.9% decreased to 89% of this base in 1999 and increased GUP = Gulf Plains to 19% above the base in 2000. It then fluctuated at Note: complete sub-IBRA area analysed 10–20% above the base until 2003 and increased to Note that this analysis does not include the locations 27% above the 1983–1991 average in 2004. The increase of natural waters, which provide additional sources from 1999 onwards was probably facilitated by some of water for stock, particularly during and following wetter years. However, it is also likely that the growing the wet season. It is not possible to report change live export trade into Southeast Asia boosted the in watered area for the 1992–2005 period. expansion of cattle numbers in the Gulf Plains bioregion in the latter years of reporting. Note that spatial Weeds averaging conceals likely variation in stocking density trends across the bioregion. There is also reduced Weeds known to occur in the Gulf Plains bioregion reliability in ABS surveys of stock numbers in years include: between their full census (1997 and 2001). This is Common name Scientific name also likely to contribute to variability in stock African boxthorn Lycium ferocissimum numbers over time. Athel pine Tamarix aphylla Bellyache bush Jatropha gossypifolia Kangaroos Calotrope Calotropis procera There are no suitable data for reporting change Chinee apple Ziziyphus mauritiana in kangaroo populations. Giant rats tail grass Sporobolus natalensis and S. pyramidalis Invasive animals Hyptis Hyptis suaveolens Mesquite Prosopis spp. Invasive animal species known to occur in the Gulf Parkinsonia Parkinsonia aculeata Plains bioregion include: Parthenium weed Parthenium hysterophorus Common name Scientific name Prickly acacia Acacia nilotica subsp. Feral pig Sus scrofa indica Fox Vulpes vulpes Rubber vine Cryptostegia grandiflora Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus Salvinia molesta Salvinia molesta Wild dog Canis spp. Sicklepod Senna obtusifolia and Feral cat Felis cattus S. tora Cane toad Bufo marinus Sida spp. Sida spp. Starling Sturnus vulgaris Water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes See www.anra.gov.au for distribution maps See www.anra.gov.au for distribution maps Gulf Plains bioregion 3 Products that support reporting Working Group indicator: Threatened communities; of landscape function and see Section 7 of Chapter 3 of Rangelands 2008 — Taking the Pulse). sustainable management In this bioregion, there are (Biodiversity Working Fire Group indicator: Threatened species): Moderate proportions (greater than 15%) of the n 6 threatened plant species bioregion were burnt in 1997, 2001 and 2004. The n 2 threatened mammal species annual area burnt in the late dry season (August to n 8 threatened bird species (including one extinct December) far exceeded the area burnt earlier in species, the paradise parrot) the year in all years between 1997 and 2005. Late dry-season fires are presumed to be more intense. n 3 threatened reptile species n no threatened amphibian or fish species. Year 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 There are areas of dense rubber vine in the Gulf Plains % area bioregion (Biodiversity Working Group indicator: burnt 15.5 4.6 14.5 9.7 29.3 11.7 12.1 24.9 3.9 Transformer species). The frequency of fire between 1997 and 2005 was moderate to high compared with all rangeland Socioeconomic characteristics bioregions, with a mean frequency (log10 transformed) of 0.30. Land use and value Most (93%) of the Gulf Plains bioregion is grazed. Dust This area has not changed appreciably over the The mean Dust Storm Index value (1992–2005) was 1992–2005 reporting period. 0.76, which was a low value among all rangeland For Queensland, unimproved rangeland values as bioregions. Dust levels were slightly higher in the at June 2006 were, on average, $2876 ± $392/km2 central east and western parts. (values expressed in 2005 dollars). There was a large range in average unimproved value across sub-IBRAs Biodiversity ($38 to $12 610/km2). It is not possible to report change in land values. In Queensland, regional ecosystems are defined by Sattler and Williams (1999) as vegetation communities in a bioregion that are consistently associated with a Key management issues particular combination of geology, landform and soil. and features Descriptions of regional ecosystems can be sourced from the Regional Ecosystem Description Database.1 Key features and issues of the Gulf Plains bioregion are: There are 84 regional ecosystems described for the n Pasture utilisation is increasing in some areas. Gulf Plains bioregion, one of which is listed as endangered n There is a low fire frequency relative to similar and 17 of which are listed as ‘of concern’ under the areas in the NT and WA which may alter Queensland Vegetation Management Act 1999.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of the Genus Vi7ex L
    J. Adelaide Sot. Gard. 10(1): 31-79(1987) A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF THE GENUS VI7EX L. (VERBENACEAE)* IN AUSTRALIA Ahmad Abid Munir State Herbarium, Botanic Gardens, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Abstract A taxonomic revision of Vitex in Australia is presented. The following eight species are recognised: V. acuminata, V. bentlzamiana, V. glabrata, V. helogiton, V. melicopea, V. rotundifolia, V. trifolia and V. velutinifolia. V. velutinifolia (from Western Australia) is described as new. V. melicopea and V. helogiton are reinstated, with V. helogiton being recorded from Australia for the first time. V. rotundifolia is reinstated as the oldest valid name for the 1-foliolate species previously often named V. ovata, V. tnfolia var. ovata, V. &Oita var. unifoliolata, V. trifolia var. simplicifolia or V. trtfolia subsp. littoralis. V. tnfolia var, bicolor is placed in synonymy of V. trifolia var. trifolia. The following four species are typified: V. acuminata, V. benthamiana, V. helogiton and V. melicopea. A mnge of material of the non- endemic species was examined from Malesia. Affinities and distribution are considered for each species. A key to the species is provided and a detailed description of each species is supplemented by a habit sketch of a flowering branch and analytical drawings of the flower. Taxonomic History of the Genus The genus Vitex was described by Linnaeus (1753) with four species, V. agnus-castus, V trifolio, V. negundo and V. pinnata. The syntypes of the first named species came from Sicily and Naples, the second and third from India, and the fourth type from Ceylon. The genus was placed together with Clerodendrum, Gmelina and a few other genera of present Verbenaceae in "Didynamia Angiospermia", where it was retained by Murray (1774), Reichard (1778), Loureiro (1793), Schreber (1791), Gmelin (1792), Persoon (1797, 1807), Willdenow (1800), Link (1822), Lamarck & Poiret (1823), Sprengel (1825), Roxburgh (1832), Dietrich (1842) and a few others.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, 22 May 2002
    Strasbourg, 21 October 2015 T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 [Inf18e_2015.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 35th meeting Strasbourg, 1-4 December 2015 GROUP OF EXPERTS ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES 1-2 July 2015 Bern, Switzerland - NATIONAL REPORTS - Compilation prepared by the Directorate of Democratic Governance / The reports are being circulated in the form and the languages in which they were received by the Secretariat. This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 - 2 – CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE __________ 1. Armenia / Arménie 2. Austria / Autriche 3. Belgium / Belgique 4. Croatia / Croatie 5. Estonia / Estonie 6. France / France 7. Italy /Italie 8. Latvia / Lettonie 9. Liechtenstein / Liechtenstein 10. Malta / Malte 11. Monaco / Monaco 12. The Netherlands / Pays-Bas 13. Poland / Pologne 14. Slovak Republic /République slovaque 15. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” / L’« ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine » 16. Ukraine - 3 - T-PVS/Inf (2015) 18 ARMENIA / ARMENIE NATIONAL REPORT OF REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ON NATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND INITIATIVES ON THE CONSERVATION OF AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE COUNTRY AND ITS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Armenia is a small landlocked mountainous country located in the Southern Caucasus. Forty four percent of the territory of Armenia is a high mountainous area not suitable for inhabitation. The degree of land use is strongly unproportional. The zones under intensive development make 18.2% of the territory of Armenia with concentration of 87.7% of total population.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioregionalism, Community and Environmental Ethics: an Approach to Geographical Borderlines
    BIOREGIONALISM, COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: AN APPROACH TO GEOGRAPHICAL BORDERLINES Dominique Waissbluth* FTER SOME INTRODUCTORY REMARKS IN SECTION 1 ON THE BIORE- GIONALIST PROJECT, section 2 advances an outline of bioregionalism in view of its implementation in communities. Section 3 examines the concepts of community and locality, assessing their respective relevan- Ace for bioregionalism. In turn, section 4 addresses concerns regarding the aims and scope of bioregionalism. In particular, I intend to demonstrate that the bioregionalist move needs yet further development in order to thoroughly represent a live alternati- ve in the environmental ethical debate on sustainability and borderline. Keywords: bioregionalism; environmental ethics; community; geographical borderlines. BIOREGIONALISMO, COMUNIDAD Y ÉTICA MEDIOAMBIENTAL: UNA APROXIMACIÓN A LOS LÍMITES GEOGRÁFICOS Luego de algunas observaciones introductorias sobre el bioregionalismo en la sec- ción 1, describo las líneas generales de la doctrina bioregionalista en vistas de su implementación en comunidades en la sección 2. La sección 3 examina los con- ceptos de comunidad y localidad, evaluando la relevancia de ellos para el proyecto bioregionalista. La sección 4 aborda los objetivos y los límites del bioregionalismo. * Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics School of Historical and Philosophical Studies University of Melbourne. Correo electrónico: [email protected] BIOREGIONALISM, COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS ● DOMINIQUE WAISSBLUTH 13 En particular, intento demostrar que el bioregionalismo requiere de desarrollos y re- finamientos ulteriores para representar una alternativa legitima en el debate en ética medioambiental sobre sustentabilidad y límites. Palabras clave: bioregionalismo; ética medioambiental; comunidad; límites geográficos 1. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS A bioregional project represents an interesting option within the debate on borderli- ne issues, since it deals with a new conception of a more sustainable reorganization of land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threatened and Near-Threatened Birds of Northern Ussuriland, South-East Russia, and the Role of the Bikin River Basin in Their Conservation KONSTANTIN E
    Bird Conservation International (1998) 8:141-171. © BirdLife International 1998 The threatened and near-threatened birds of northern Ussuriland, south-east Russia, and the role of the Bikin River basin in their conservation KONSTANTIN E. MIKHAILOV and YURY B. SHIBNEV Summary Fieldwork on the distribution, habitat preferences and status of birds was conducted in the Bikin River basin, northern Ussuriland, south-east Russia, during May-July 1992,1993, 1995,1996 and 1997. The results of this survey combined with data collected during 1960- 1990, show the area to be of high conservation priority and one of the most important for the conservation of Blakiston's Fish Owl Ketupa blakistoni, Chinese Merganser Mergus squamatus, Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata and Hooded Crane Grus monacha. This paper reports on all of the 13 threatened and near-threatened breeding species of northern Ussuriland, with special emphasis on their occurrence and status in the Bikin area. Three more species, included in the Red Data Book of Russia, are also briefly discussed. Maps show the distribution of the breeding sites of the species discussed. The establishment of a nature reserve in the lower Bikin area is suggested as the only way to conserve the virgin Manchurian-type habitats (wetlands and forests), and all 10 species of special conservation concern. Monitoring of the local populations of Blakiston's Fish Owl, Chinese Merganser and Mandarin Duck in the middle Bikin is required. Introduction No other geographical region of Russia has as rich a biodiversity as Ussuriland which includes the territory of Primorski Administrative Region and the most southern part of Khabarovsk Administrative Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioregions: an Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective and a Proposal for California
    CALIFORNIAFISH ANDGAME Calif. Fish and Game (80)3:97-l24 1994 BIOREGIONS: AN ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE AND A PROPOSAL FOR CALIFORNIA HARTWELL H. WELSH, JR. USDA Forest Service Redwood Sciences Laboratory 1700 Bayview Dr. Arcata, CA. 95521 Bioregions are natural assemblages of plants and animals with discernible but dynamic boundaries existing simultaneously along both spatial and temporal trajectories.I argue that the designation of bioregions should be based on the study of biogeography and must adhere to the tenets of this discipline; they are not spatial designations of political convenience. Bioregions are defined by physiographic and climatic limits that define the natural communities of organisms in space and time through interactions with the physiological and behavioral capabilities of these organisms. Plants are less vagile than animals and therefore lend themselves better to describing such natural communities. Despite the fluctuation of biotic communities in both time and space, and the anthropogenic bias inherent in defining their composition, such natural assemblages do exist on the landscape and they are of scientific interest and have useful management applications. I propose sixteen bioregions for thestateof California and include definitions of geographic boundaries, dominant plant communities, and lists of vertebrate species typical of these bioregions. INTRODUCTION My purpose in describing a set of biotic provinces for California is two-fold: (1) to establish such sub-divisions with a firm biological basis, grounded in the biogeographic literature; and (2) to provide a biogeographic framework for the conservation of California’s faunaI resources and natural biodiversity, while facilitating wise use of its natural resources. My particular emphasis is on vertebrate wildlife resources, and these proposed bioregions were initially-developed to provide the basis for a bioregional revision of California’s statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationships System (WHR) (Airola 1988) in order to improve the system’s accuracy and utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on the Land Use History of North America: a Context for Understanding Our Changing Environment
    Perspectives on the Land Use History of North America: A Context for Understanding Our Changing Environment Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-1998-0003 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division 19990419 064 USGS Abstract: Ecological change is constant and profound, yet it often occurs at temporal and spatial scales that are difficult to measure and interpret. This publication demonstrates how diverse data bases, archived in different formats and at numerous locations, can be brought together to provide an integrated perspective on the relationship between land use and landcover change. The authors provide the historical context for interpreting recent landcover change in several regions of North America and articulate the value of a comprehensive, continental land-use history for guiding environmental policy and management decisions during the coming century and beyond. Key Words: ecological change; land use; land cover; North America; temporal scale; spatial scale Suggested citation: Sisk, T.D., editor. 1998. Perspectives on the land-use history of North America: a context for understanding our changing environment. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Biological Science Report USGS/ BRD/BSR-1998-0003. 104pp. Contents Page Preface vi Part 1: Continental Perspectives Chapter 1 Toward a Land Use History of North America, Thomas D. Sisk 1 Chapter 2 Historical Interrelationships between Population Settlement and Farmland in the Conterminous United States, 1790 to 1992, Margaret Maizel, R. Denis White, Stuart Gage, Leon Osborne, Ralph Root, Susan Stitt, and George Muehlbach 5 Chapter 3 Assessing the Impact of Urban Sprawl on Soil Resources in the United States Using Nighttime "City Lights" Satellite Images and Digital Soils Maps, MarcL.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education in Cities and Regions for Stronger, Cleaner and Fairer Regions
    Higher Education in Cities and Regions For Stronger, Cleaner and Fairer Regions 10-11 February 2011 Seville, Spain Abstract Guide Note: Sessions may be subject to last minute changes You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected]. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. PLENARY SESSIONS Victor Arredondo Álvarez START: A comprehensive university strategy for cleaner, stronger and fairer regions Thursday 10 February 11:30-13:00 Plenary Room Universities contribute to self-sustained development in many ways: by stimulating clean reforms in their own Campus landscape, infrastructure, and consumption and management practices; adopting more environmentally friendly patterns of ICT usage; adapting curricula, learning “hands‐on” experiences and staff training programmes to drive local competitiveness and fair growth; emphasising innovative R&D and green entrepreneurship; promoting intensive networking and partnerships with academic institutions, agencies, businesses, and programmes engaged in local development; reorienting their institutional mission and priorities to promote equity and social relevance of all levels of education; transferring clean, intelligent and fair solutions to challenges facing the community and supporting public awareness of international interdependency.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S
    Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Dr. Catherine L. Ross, Principal Investigator CENTER FOR QUALITY GROWTH AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT at the GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2008 Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning Project Title: Megaregions and Transportation Planning (FHWA-BAA-HEPP-02-2007) Deliverable 1b: a report comprised of case studies that summarize the application of large-scale regionalism in the U.S. and abroad and the existing literature on megaregions Submitted to: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Planning, HEPP-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Point of Contact: Supin Yoder Submitted by: Georgia Tech Research Corporation (A Non-profit, State Controlled Institution of Higher Education) Principal Investigator: Dr. Catherine L. Ross ([email protected]) Co-PIs: Jason Barringer, Jiawen Yang Researchers: Myungje Woo, Jessica Doyle, Harry West, with Adjo Amekudzi and Michael Meyer Georgia Institute of Technology College of Architecture Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development (CQGRD) 760 Spring Street, Suite 213 Atlanta, GA 30332-0790 Phone: (404) 385-5133, FAX: (404) 385-5127 ii Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SECTION I. OVERVIEW 9 A. Research Background 9 B. Report Organization 10 SECTION II. FOUNDATIONS AND DELINEATION APPROACHES 11 A. Examining the Literature 11 1. Regionalism 11 2. Globalization 12 3. Global Climate Change 13 4. Economic Geography 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Tropical Sea Treasures
    Twelve Tropical Sea Treasures Underwater Icons of Northern Australia Underwater Icons of Northern Australia Cobourg Pinnacles 4 Van Diemen Rise 3 • Darwin Fog Bay 2 1 Joseph Bonaparte Gulf • Wyndham • Derby 1 Joseph Bonaparte Gulf – huge tides, sea snakes and red-legged banana prawns 2 Fog Bay – flatback turtles, seabirds and critically endangered sawfish 3 Van Diemen Rise – carbonate banks, olive ridley turtles and coral reef cafes for sharks 4 Cobourg Pinnacles – ancient reef remnants, light-loving marine life, leatherback turtles 5 Arafura Canyons – deepwater upwellings, whale sharks and special red snapper 6 Arnhem Shelf Islands – clear waters, endemic species and underwater sacred sites 5 Arafura Canyons Cobourg Pinnacles 12 Torres Strait Arnhem Shelf Islands 6 7 Northern Gulf • Nhulunbuy • Darwin • Weipa 11 Central Gulf/ 8 Groote Cape York Joseph Bonaparte Gulf 9 Limmen Bight 10 Southern Gulf • Karumba 7 Northern Gulf – traditional knowledge and contemporary science 8 Groote – rare snubfin dolphins and sea turtles 9 Limmen Bight – seagrass meadows, dugong haven 10 Southern Gulf – fresh waters, wild rivers and phytoplankton 11 Central Gulf/Cape York – soft bottoms, heart urchins and a clockwise current 12 Torres Strait – sea turtle highway Our northern tropical seas Northern Australians love getting out on the water. tropical marine life that is threatened with extinction in A quarter of Territorians own a boat. We fish, sail, other parts of the world. It is the good health of these kayak, and even swim and snorkel in our waters waters and the abundant (but threatened) sea life they when the season is right and the water is safe.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Bioregion
    WEST COAST BIOREGION ABOUT THE BIOREGION SUMMARY OF FISHING AND AQUACULTURE The marine environment of the West Coast bioregion between Kalbarri and Augusta is predominantly a temperate ACTIVITIES oceanic zone, but it is heavily influenced by the Leeuwin Current, which transports warm tropical water southward The principal commercial fishery in this region is the western along the edge of the continental shelf. Most of the fish rock lobster fishery which is Australia’s most valuable stocks of the region are temperate, in keeping with the coastal single-species wild capture fishery. There are also significant water temperatures that range from 18° C to about 24° C. The commercial trawl, dive and pot fisheries for other Leeuwin Current is also responsible for the existence of the invertebrates including scallops, abalone, blue swimmer unusual Abrolhos Islands coral reefs at latitude 29° S and the crabs and octopus. Commercial fishers take a range of finfish extended southward distribution of many tropical species species including sharks, dhufish, snapper, baldchin groper along the west and south coasts. and emperors using demersal line and net methods. Beach The Leeuwin Current system, which can be up to several based methods such as beach seining and near-shore hundred kilometres wide along the West Coast, flows most gillnetting, and hand-hauled nets are used to capture strongly in autumn/winter (April to August) and has its whitebait, mullet and whiting in a restricted number of origins in ocean flows from the Pacific through the locations. Indonesian archipelago. The current is variable in strength The West Coast Bioregion, which contains the state’s major from year-to-year, flowing at speeds typically around 1 knot, population centres, is the most heavily used bioregion for but has been recorded at 3 knots on occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • GE176 World Regional Geography
    Course Number/Title: GE 176 World Regional Geography Year: Fall 2012 Department: Social Science/ Geography Credit Hours: 3 Required Text: World Regional Geography, by Pulsipher Days/Time: TR 9:25-10:40 a.m. ISBN: 1-4292-3241-2 Room #: BMC 712 Instructor: Dr. Linda Davis-Stephens Prerequisite: None Office Hours: M-F 9:00 a.m. & M-R@ 2 p.m. BMC 701 Phone #: (785) 460-5528 Email: [email protected] Course Placement: Any Required :https://app.onelogin.com/client/apps http://thecollaboratory.wikidot.com/world-regional-geography-fall-2012 RATIONALE This course fulfills a Social Sciences requirement in the General Education Requirements of the Transfer and Articulation agreement between the Kansas Regents Universities and Kansas Community Colleges. The purpose of the course is to promote student scholarship, initiative, and innovation in the subject of world regional geography. The focus is for students to both reason with and reason about geography. One aim is to develop skills and knowledge to answer geographic questions. Another is to understand and appreciate the interdependence and interrelationships of peoples, places, and environments. COURSE DESCRIPTION Students locate regions and realms of the world using outline maps, atlas, and text. Course content will focus on geographic spatial realities and perspectives. As a survey course, overviews cover major topical subfields of physical and human/cultural geography. This course is an interdisciplinary study that bridges the humanities and the physical and social sciences. COURSE
    [Show full text]