Television and Taste Hierarchy: the Case of Dutch Television Comedy
Television and taste hierarchy: The case of Dutch television comedy When applied to television, the classical distinction between highbrow and lowbrow culture does not seem to make much sense. Such hierarchical ranking of taste, drawing a clear boundary between difficult and sophisticated highbrow taste and accessible, entertaining popular taste, seems to lose much of its validity when confronted with television’s fragmented and eclectic mixture of information and entertainment; art, play and commerce. In fact, most of television’s fare consists of what is generally subsumed under the heading of popular or lowbrow culture: the large majority of television programming consists of popular entertainment genres such as comedy, soap, popular drama, pop music, or sports. There is a tendency, both in common sense and in academic thought, to simply write off the whole medium as lowbrow and popular (Seiter 1999, esp. 1-6). A very striking example, both of the low status of TV, and the (academic) prejudice against the medium, can be found in Pierre Bourdieu’s Distinction (1984). Distinction, probably the most influential work on hierarchies of taste, describes taste differences between upper, middle and working classes in France. In what is probably the central figure of the book, showing the relationship between taste, economic capital (money) and cultural capital (education), newspapers, music and movie actors are mentioned individually, and occupy very different positions (Bourdieu 1984: 128-129). However, there are no television programs in this figure. Instead, only the medium itself is in the figure, and it is somewhere down in the middle, close to potatoes, sports fishing, ordinary red wine, foremen, and an income of 21,000 franks, which is well below average.
[Show full text]