Diverse Population Trajectories Among Coexisting Species of Subarctic Forest Moths
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park
Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Platarctia parthenos Photo: D. Vujnovic Prepared for: Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Prepared by: Doug Macaulay and Greg Pohl Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild May 10, 2005 Figure 1. Doug Macaulay and Gerald Hilchie walking on a cutline near site 26. (Photo by Stacy Macaulay) Figure 2. Stacey Macaulay crossing a beaver dam at site 33. (Photo by Doug Macaulay) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. Factors affecting the Survey...........................................................................................4 II. Taxa of particular interest.............................................................................................5 A. Butterflies:...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Macro-moths .................................................................................................................. -
Diverse Population Trajectories Among Coexisting Species of Subarctic Forest Moths
Popul Ecol (2010) 52:295–305 DOI 10.1007/s10144-009-0183-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Diverse population trajectories among coexisting species of subarctic forest moths Mikhail V. Kozlov • Mark D. Hunter • Seppo Koponen • Jari Kouki • Pekka Niemela¨ • Peter W. Price Received: 19 May 2008 / Accepted: 6 October 2009 / Published online: 12 December 2009 Ó The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2009 Abstract Records of 232 moth species spanning 26 years times higher than those of species hibernating as larvae or (total catch of ca. 230,000 specimens), obtained by con- pupae. Time-series analysis demonstrated that periodicity tinuous light-trapping in Kevo, northernmost subarctic in fluctuations of annual catches is generally independent Finland, were used to examine the hypothesis that life- of life-history traits and taxonomic affinities of the species. history traits and taxonomic position contribute to both Moreover, closely related species with similar life-history relative abundance and temporal variability of Lepidoptera. traits often show different population dynamics, under- Species with detritophagous or moss-feeding larvae, spe- mining the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis. Species cies hibernating in the larval stage, and species pupating with the shortest (1 year) time lag in the action of negative during the first half of the growing season were over-rep- feedback processes on population growth exhibit the larg- resented among 42 species classified as abundant during est magnitude of fluctuations. Our analyses revealed that the entire sampling period. The coefficients of variation in only a few consistent patterns in the population dynamics annual catches of species hibernating as eggs averaged 1.7 of herbivorous moths can be deduced from life-history characteristics of the species. -
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes. -
The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition
The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 1 The Smaller Moths of Staffordshire Updated and Revised Edition By D.W. Emley 2014 Staffordshire Biological Recording Scheme Publication No. 22 Published by Staffordshire Ecological Record, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford Copyright © D.W. Emley, 2014 ISBN (online version): 978-1-910434-00-0 Available from : http://www.staffs-ecology.org.uk Front cover : Beautiful Plume Amblyptilia acanthadactyla, Dave Emley Introduction to the up-dated and revised edition ............................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MICROPTERIGIDAE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 ERIOCRANIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 3 NEPTICULIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 4 OPOSTEGIDAE .............................................................................................................................................. 6 HELIOZELIDAE ............................................................................................................................................. -
Download Als
Dieses PDF wird von der Arbeitsgemeinschaft bayerischer Entomologen e.V.für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch zur Verfügung gestellt. Die kommerzielle Nutzung oder die Bereitstellung in einer öffentlichen Bibliothek oder auf einer website ist verboten. Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 16:39–54, Bamberg (2016), ISSN 1430-015X Neue Ergebnisse in der bayerischen Kleinschmetterlingsfaunistik – 4. Beitrag (Insecta: Lepidoptera) von Gerald Fuchs & Werner Wolf Abstract: The first bavarian record of Coleophora absinthii Wocke, 1877 is given. The occurrence of Stigmella magdalenae (Klimesch, 1950), Stigmella speciosa (Frey, 1858), Ectoedemia weaveri (Stainton, 1858), Triaxomera parasitella (Hübner, 1796) and Phyllonorycter oxyacanthae (Frey, 1856) in the natural region pre-Alpine hills and moorland (foothills) and Alps is evidenced for the first time. Argyresthia praecocella Zeller, 1839, Aplota palpella (Haworth, 1828) and Udea fulvalis (Hübner, 1809) are recorded for the first time in the natural region Tertiär-Hügelland und voralpine Schotterplatten. Argyresthia semifusca (Haworth, 1828), Cosmopterix scribaiella Zeller, 1850, Psoricoptera speciosella Teich, 1893 and Scrobipalpula tussilaginis (Stainton, 1867) are recorded for the first time in the natural region Schichtstufenland, as is Coleophora vitisella Gregson, 1856 for the natural region Ostbayerische Grundgebirge. First reliable records of Yponomeuta rorrella (Hübner, 1796) from the natural region Ostbayerische Grundgebirge, of Gelechia hippophaella (Schrank, 1802) and Olindia schumacherana (Fabricius, 1787) from the natural region Tertiär-Hügelland und voralpine Schotterplatten, and of Teleiodes flavimaculella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854) from the natural region pre-alpine hills and moorland and Alps are given. In addition to Haslberger & Segerer (2016) interesting (re)discoveries are mentioned and partially discussed. Zusammenfassung: Für Bayern wird der Erstfund von Coleophora absinthii Wocke, 1877 mitgeteilt. -
Identification of Leaf-Mining Lepidoptera
THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEAF-MINING LEPIDOPTERA INTRODUCTION The aim of this booklet is to enable the user to identify most of the leaf-mining lepidoptera. It is not possible to cover all the leaf-mining species in such a small booklet, however over 90% of the true mining species should be identifiable with its use. The guide has been kept as simple as possible. Along with the usual keys I have added a chart on hawthorn to assist with the identification of the Nepticulidae. Much of the information contained herein is gleaned from volumes 1 and 2 of “The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland” with some addition notes supplied by A. Maitland Emmet along with the occasional modification of my own. I have also included within the birch feeding miners a key written by David Manning on the Eriocraniidae. A word of warning before you start to look at mines, some flies, beetles, wasps and sawflies also produce larvae that mine leaves, so it is possible that these could be mistaken for lepidopterous mines. A good guide is that the larvae of the Nepticulidae usually leave their frass, droppings, in a continuous line and the larvae of the Gracillariidae usually pile their frass in a particular place inside the mine; there are, of course, a few exceptions to this. Generally flies etc. leave their frass in irregular patches and usually there is much less frass in the mines of flies etc. than in those produced by lepidoptera. A further guide is to look at the list of foodplants which follows, if the plant you have found a mine in is not in this list it is quite likely that it will not be a lepidopteran mine. -
On the Spot April 2021.Docx
On The Spot The newsletter for members of the Glasgow and South-west Scotland Branch of Butterfly Conservation A warm welcome to all new and existing members of Glasgow & South West Scotland Butterfly Conservation. We hope you find this newsletter a useful round-up of interesting articles, key dates for your diary and important contacts. The Glasgow and South West Scotland Branch committee wishes you a wonderful butterfly and moth season! Branch AGM and Upcoming Events Join us online on Wednesday 5th May for our Branch AGM! It will run between 7.30pm and 8.30pm, and while there will be some AGM formalities, we hope it will be a chance for you to connect with others in the branch area. It will be held via Zoom - see our events page for booking information. With many events cancelled or being rescheduled because of Covid-19, the best way to keep up to date with events is to visit the Glasgow & South West Scotland webpage for full details on events listings. Purple Hairstreak, Gilles San Martin Welcome from the Branch Chair Welcome to the spring 2021 edition of On the Spot, and a particularly warm welcome to the members who have joined Butterfly Conservation and the branch in the last year! The last year has been an incredibly difficult and challenging time for everyone. Unfortunately, due to the impacts of Covid-19 the branch didn’t manage to put out our annual newsletter in 2020. Butterfly and moth recording was also negatively impacted by travel restrictions for most of 2020. One of the consequences of theCovid-19 lockdown has been an increased general awareness of the importance of gardens, public green spaces and access to the environment for both physical and mental health. -
Glos Species of Conservation Concern
Gloucestershire Key Wildlife Sites Handbook Part 3: Appendices Appendix 3 – Species of conservation concern in Gloucestershire This Appendix contains the reference species lists for use when assessing the minimum thresholds for selecting KWS on species grounds. General thresholds for different categories of species conservation status are detailed in Part 2 of the KWS Handbook, Section 2.6. Key species groups such at bats, amphibians and butterflies also have an accompanying rationale for site selection, provided by the relevant expert County Recorders. “Schedule” in the Status column of the species lists refers to schedules of The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (and subsequent amendments) unless otherwise stated. IUCN Red List refers to the IUCN Global Red List; National Red List is the national listing based on IUCN criteria but applied regionally rather than globally. A longer summary of the legislation and designation categories relating to species status is listed in Appendix 4 . The relevant threshold from the Species Criteria in Section 2.6 is included next to each species list, or individual species entry where applicable. Please note that these tables will be subject to regular updates as and when the status of species is reviewed, and that some species may occasionally be added to, or removed from, the lists. Species assemblage indices may also change from time to time. Please check that you have the latest version of Appendix 3 before assessing a site for KWS selection! If in doubt, a master list of all UK conservation designations is available from the JNCC website here: http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3408. -
Lepidoptera in Cheshire 2005
Lepidoptera in Cheshire 2005 A report detailing records received for the moths and butterflies of Vice-county 58 Lancashire & Cheshire Entomological Society Promoting the Study of Insects in the North West Founded – 1877 Charities Registration No.: 508729 S.P. Farrell, S.H. Hind, B.T. Shaw 30th April 2006 2 Introduction This report follows our usual format but as always we have attempted to improve the quality and usefulness of the information included. We have added what are hoped will become regular and useful features of the report, for example a summary of the previous year’s National Moth Night Results and weather summary. The butterfly section is a condensed version of Barry Shaw’s report produced annually for Butterfly Conservation. As a result of this, the formatting of dates etc. is slightly different in the moth and butterfly sections of the report. His report has been illustrated with photographs kindly provided by Peter Eeles who runs the UK Butterflies website - see the links at the end of this report for details. The moth data are summarised and presented here for the first time. They are also well illustrated with photographs, which are images of the actual moths referred to in the text unless specified otherwise in the text. We have produced two versions of the report for those downloading from the Internet. One of these has the photographs removed and therefore creates a much reduced file size. The current report and all past and previous reports, newsletters and distribution matrices since 2000 can be downloaded as full-colour, free PDF files from www.butterfly-conservation.com by clicking the ‘Report Centre’ button and then the appropriate link. -
Checklist of British Lepidoptera
Checklist of British Lepidoptera 1 Micropterix tunbergella (Fabricius, 1784) Micropterigidae 2 Micropterix mansuetella Zeller, 1844 Micropterigidae 3 Micropterix aureatella (Scopoli, 1763) Micropterigidae 4 Micropterix aruncella (Scopoli, 1763) Micropterigidae 5 Micropterix calthella (Linnaeus, 1761) Micropterigidae 6 Eriocrania subpurpurella (Haworth, 1828) Eriocraniidae 7 Eriocrania chrysolepidella Zeller, 1851 Eriocraniidae Nb 8 Eriocrania unimaculella (Zetterstedt, 1839) Eriocraniidae 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella (Bosc, 1791) Eriocraniidae 10 Eriocrania salopiella (Stainton, 1854) Eriocraniidae 11 Eriocrania cicatricella (Zetterstedt, 1839) Eriocraniidae 11 Eriocrania haworthi Bradley, 1966 Eriocraniidae 11 Eriocrania purpurella (Haworth, 1828) Eriocraniidae 12 Eriocrania sangii (Wood, 1891) Eriocraniidae 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella (Stephens, 1835) Eriocraniidae 14 Hepialus humuli (Linnaeus, 1758) Ghost Moth Hepialidae Common 14 Hepialus humuli humuli (Linnaeus, 1758) Ghost Moth Hepialidae Common 14 Hepialus humuli thulensis Newman, 1865 Ghost Moth Hepialidae Local 15 Hepialus sylvina (Linnaeus, 1761) Orange Swift Hepialidae Common 16 Hepialus hecta (Linnaeus, 1758) Gold Swift Hepialidae Local 17 Hepialus lupulinus (Linnaeus, 1758) Common Swift Hepialidae Common 18 Hepialus fusconebulosa (DeGeer, 1778) Map-winged Swift Hepialidae Local 18 Hepialus fusconebulosa f. gallicus Lederer, 1853 Map-winged Swift Hepialidae Local 19 Bohemannia quadrimaculella (Boheman, 1851) Nepticulidae 20 Ectoedemia decentella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) Nepticulidae -
Identification of Leaf-Mining Lepidoptera
THE IDENTIFICATION OF LEAF-MINING LEPIDOPTERA INTRODUCTION The aim of this booklet is to enable the user to identify most of the leaf-mining lepidoptera. It is not possible to cover all the leaf-mining species in such a small booklet, however over 90% of the true mining species should be identifiable with its use. The guide has been kept as simple as possible. Along with the usual keys I have added a chart on hawthorn to assist with the identification of the Nepticulidae. Much of the information contained herein is gleaned from volumes 1 and 2 of “The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland” with some addition notes supplied by A. Maitland Emmet along with the occasional modification of my own. I have also included within the birch feeding miners a key written by David Manning on the Eriocraniidae. A word of warning before you start to look at mines, some flies, beetles, wasps and sawflies also produce larvae that mine leaves, so it is possible that these could be mistaken for lepidopterous mines. A good guide is that the larvae of the Nepticulidae usually leave their frass, droppings, in a continuous line and the larvae of the Gracillariidae usually pile their frass in a particular place inside the mine; there are, of course, a few exceptions to this. Generally flies etc. leave their frass in irregular patches and usually there is much less frass in the mines of flies etc. than in those produced by lepidoptera. A further guide is to look at the list of foodplants which follows, if the plant you have found a mine in is not in this list it is quite likely that it will not be a lepidopteran mine. -
A Revision of Invertebrate Features of Designated Sites in Scotland
Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 1007 A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 1007 A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Athayde Tonhasca Scottish Natural Heritage Battleby PERTH PH1 3EW Telephone: 01738 458671 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Littlewood, N.A. 2017. A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 1007. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2017. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland Commissioned Report No. 1007 Project No: 013952 Contractor: Nick Littlewood Year of publication: 2017 Keywords assemblages; invertebrates; notified features; qualifying features; site condition monitoring; SSSI Background Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) are designated on the basis of notified features. For invertebrates, notified features range from individual species, through assemblages of a specific taxon, to the overall invertebrate assemblage. For a variety of reasons, the invertebrates’ notified features do not always reflect the currently established criteria for selecting such features for site protection and designation purposes. In some cases, citations are based on old records that may now be considered unreliable whilst in others, the records do not demonstrate that the species or assemblages are of sufficient quality to meet the criteria.