DOCSLIB.ORG

Fortran Programmer's Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fortran Programmer's Guide Fortran Programmer’s Guide Fortran 77 4.2 Fortran 90 1.2 SunSoft, Inc. A Sun Microsystems, Inc. Business 2550 Garcia Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043 USA 415 960-1300 fax 415 969-9131 Part No.: 802-5664-10 Revision A, December 1996 Copyright 1996 Sun Microsystems, Inc., 2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043-1100 U.S.A. All rights reserved. This product or document is protected by copyright and distributed under licenses restricting its use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. No part of this product or document may be reproduced in any form by any means without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any. Portions of this product may be derived from the UNIX® system, licensed from Novell, Inc., and from the Berkeley 4.3 BSD system, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries and is exclusively licensed by X/Open Company Ltd. Third-party software, including font technology in this product, is protected by copyright and licensed from Sun’s suppliers. RESTRICTED RIGHTS: Use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. Government is subject to restrictions of FAR 52.227- 14(g)(2)(6/87) and FAR 52.227-19(6/87), or DFAR 252.227-7015(b)(6/95) and DFAR 227.7202-3(a). Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, Solaris, SunSoft, Sun WorkShop, Sun Performance WorkShop and Sun Performance Library are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. The OPEN LOOK® and Sun™ Graphical User Interfaces were developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its users and licensees. Sun acknowledges the pioneering efforts of Xerox in researching and developing the concept of visual or graphical user interfaces for the computer industry. Sun holds a non-exclusive license from Xerox to the Xerox Graphical User Interface, which license also covers Sun’s licensees who implement OPEN LOOK GUIs and otherwise comply with Sun’s written license agreements. f90 IS DERIVED FROM CRAY CF90™, A PRODUCT OF CRAY RESEARCH, INC. THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. Please Recycle Contents Preface . xiii 1. Introduction . 1 Standards Conformance. 1 Features of the Fortran Compilers . 2 Related Sun Documentation . 3 2. Fortran Input/Output . 5 Accessing Files From Fortran 77 Programs . 5 Accessing Named Files . 5 Opening Files Without a Name. 7 Preconnected Units. 7 Opening Files Without an OPEN Statement . 8 Passing File Names to Programs. 9 VAX / VMS Logical File Names (f77 Only) . 12 Direct I/O. 13 Internal Files . 15 Contents iii Tape I/O . 17 Using TOPEN Routines . 17 Fortran Formatted I/O for Tape . 17 Fortran Unformatted I/O for Tape . 17 Tape File Representation . 18 End-of-File . 18 Using Multifile Tapes . 19 Fortran 90 I/O Considerations . 19 3. Program Development . 21 Facilitating Program Builds With the make Utility. 21 The makefile. 21 make Command . 23 Macros . 23 Overriding of Macro Values . 24 Suffix Rules in make . 25 More Information . 25 Version Tracking and Control With SCCS . 26 Controlling Files With SCCS . 26 Checking Files Out and In . 28 More Information . 29 4. Libraries . 31 Understanding Libraries . 31 Advantages of Libraries. 32 Linker Debugging Options . 32 iv Fortran Programmer’s Guide Generating a Load Map . 32 Listing Other Information . 33 Consistent Compiling and Linking . 34 Library Search Paths and Order . 35 Search Order for Standard Library Paths. 35 Library Search Path and Order — Static Linking . 36 Library Search Path and Order — Dynamic Linking . 37 Creating Static Libraries. 39 Tradeoffs . 39 Creation of a Simple Static Library . 40 Creating Dynamic Libraries. 44 Tradeoffs . 44 Position-Independent Code and –pic. 45 Binding Options . 45 Naming Conventions . 46 A Simple Dynamic Library . 46 Libraries Provided with Sun Fortran Compilers. 48 Shippable Libraries . 50 5. Program Analysis and Debugging. 51 Global Program Checking (f77 Only) . 51 GPC Overview . 52 How to Invoke Global Program Checking . 53 Some Examples of -Xlist and Global Program Checking . 55 Suboptions for Global Checking Across Routines . 59 Contents v –Xlist Suboption Reference . 61 Some Examples Using Suboptions . 65 Special Compiler Options . 67 Subscript Bounds (–C) . 67 Undeclared Variable Types (–u) . 67 Version Checking (–V) . 68 Interactive Debugging With dbx and The WorkShop . 68 Debugging Optimized Programs . 69 Viewing Compiler Listing Diagnostics. 69 6. Floating-Point Arithmetic . 71 Introduction . 71 IEEE Floating-Point Arithmetic. 72 Handling Exceptions . 74 Trapping a Floating-Point Exception–f77 vs f90 . 74 IEEE Routines . 74 Flags and ieee_flags() . 75 IEEE Extreme Value Functions . 79 Exception Handlers and ieee_handler() . 80 Retrospective Summary . 86 SPARC: Nonstandard Arithmetic . 86 –ftrap=mode Compiler Options. 87 Floating-Point Exceptions–f77 vs f90 . 88 Debugging IEEE Exceptions . 88 Further Numerical Adventures. 91 vi Fortran Programmer’s Guide Simple Underflow. 92 Continuing With the Wrong Answer . 92 Excessive Underflow (SPARC Only) . 93 Porting from Scientific Mainframes . 94 7. Porting. 95 Time Functions . 95 Formats. 98 Carriage-Control . 98 Working With Files . 99 Data Representation . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIX and Computer Science Spreading UNIX Around the World: by Ronda Hauben an Interview with John Lions
    Winter/Spring 1994 Celebrating 25 Years of UNIX Volume 6 No 1 "I believe all significant software movements start at the grassroots level. UNIX, after all, was not developed by the President of AT&T." Kouichi Kishida, UNIX Review, Feb., 1987 UNIX and Computer Science Spreading UNIX Around the World: by Ronda Hauben An Interview with John Lions [Editor's Note: This year, 1994, is the 25th anniversary of the [Editor's Note: Looking through some magazines in a local invention of UNIX in 1969 at Bell Labs. The following is university library, I came upon back issues of UNIX Review from a "Work In Progress" introduced at the USENIX from the mid 1980's. In these issues were articles by or inter- Summer 1993 Conference in Cincinnati, Ohio. This article is views with several of the pioneers who developed UNIX. As intended as a contribution to a discussion about the sig- part of my research for a paper about the history and devel- nificance of the UNIX breakthrough and the lessons to be opment of the early days of UNIX, I felt it would be helpful learned from it for making the next step forward.] to be able to ask some of these pioneers additional questions The Multics collaboration (1964-1968) had been created to based on the events and developments described in the UNIX "show that general-purpose, multiuser, timesharing systems Review Interviews. were viable." Based on the results of research gained at MIT Following is an interview conducted via E-mail with John using the MIT Compatible Time-Sharing System (CTSS), Lions, who wrote A Commentary on the UNIX Operating AT&T and GE agreed to work with MIT to build a "new System describing Version 6 UNIX to accompany the "UNIX hardware, a new operating system, a new file system, and a Operating System Source Code Level 6" for the students in new user interface." Though the project proceeded slowly his operating systems class at the University of New South and it took years to develop Multics, Doug Comer, a Profes- Wales in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Process Validation: Quantitatively Measuring the Correspondence of a Process to a Model
    Software Process Validation: Quantitatively Measuring the Correspondence of a Process to a Model JONATHAN E. COOK New Mexico State University and ALEXANDER L. WOLF University of Colorado To a great extent, the usefulness of a formal model of a software process lies in its ability to accurately predict the behavior of the executing process. Similarly, the usefulness of an executing process lies largely in its ability to fulfill the requirements embodied in a formal model of the process. When process models and process executions diverge, something significant is happening. We have developed techniques for uncovering and measuring the discrepancies between models and executions, which we call process validation. Process validation takes a process execution and a process model, and measures the level of correspon- dence between the two. Our metrics are tailorable and give process engineers control over determining the severity of different types of discrepancies. The techniques provide detailed information once a high-level measurement indicates the presence of a problem. We have applied our process validation methods in an industrial case study, of which a portion is described in this article. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D.2.6 [Software Engineering]: Programming Environ- ments; K.6.3 [Management of Computing and Information Systems]: Software Manage- ment—software development; software maintenance General Terms: Management Additional Key Words and Phrases: Balboa, process validation, software process, tools This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grants CCR-93- 02739 and CCR-9804067, and the Air Force Materiel Command, Rome Laboratory, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under Contract Number F30602-94-C-0253.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle® Developer Studio 12.5
    ® Oracle Developer Studio 12.5: C User's Guide Part No: E60745 June 2017 Oracle Developer Studio 12.5: C User's Guide Part No: E60745 Copyright © 2016, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Analysis Handbook: Software Complexity Analysis and Software Reliability Estimation and Prediction
    Technical Memorandum 104799 Software Analysis Handbook: Software Complexity Analysis and Software Reliability Estimation and Prediction Alice T. Lee Todd Gunn (NASA-TM-I04799) SOFTWARE ANALYSIS N95-I1914 Tuan Pham HANDBOOK: SOFTWARE COMPLEXITY Ron Ricaldi ANALYSIS AND SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION (NASA. Unclas Johnson Space Center) 96 p G3159 0023056 August 1994 ..0 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum 104799 Software Analysis Handbook: Software Complexity Analysis and Software Reliability Estimation and Prediction Alice T. Lee Safety, Reliability, & Quaflty Assurance Office Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Todd Gunn, Tuan Pham, and Ron Ricaldi Loral Space Information Systems Houston, Texas National Aeronautics and Space Administration Thispublication is available from the NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, 800 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934, (301) 621-0390. Summary The purpose of this handbook is to document the software analysis process as it is performed by the Analysis and Risk Assessment Branch of the Safety, Reliability, and Quality Assurance Office at the Johnson Space Center. The handbook also provides a summary of the tools and methodologies used to perform software analysis. This handbook is comprised of two sepa- rate sections describing aspects of software complexity and software reliability estimation and prediction. The body of this document will delineate the background, theories, tools, and analysis procedures of these approaches. Software complexity analysis can provide quantitative information on code to the designing, testing, and maintenance organizations throughout the software life cycle. Diverse information on code structure, critical components, risk areas, testing deficiencies, and opportunities for improvement can be obtained using software complexity analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • To Type Or Not to Type: Quantifying Detectable Bugs in Javascript
    To Type or Not to Type: Quantifying Detectable Bugs in JavaScript Zheng Gao Christian Bird Earl T. Barr University College London Microsoft Research University College London London, UK Redmond, USA London, UK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—JavaScript is growing explosively and is now used in to invest in static type systems for JavaScript: first Google large mature projects even outside the web domain. JavaScript is released Closure1, then Microsoft published TypeScript2, and also a dynamically typed language for which static type systems, most recently Facebook announced Flow3. What impact do notably Facebook’s Flow and Microsoft’s TypeScript, have been written. What benefits do these static type systems provide? these static type systems have on code quality? More concretely, Leveraging JavaScript project histories, we select a fixed bug how many bugs could they have reported to developers? and check out the code just prior to the fix. We manually add The fact that long-running JavaScript projects have extensive type annotations to the buggy code and test whether Flow and version histories, coupled with the existence of static type TypeScript report an error on the buggy code, thereby possibly systems that support gradual typing and can be applied to prompting a developer to fix the bug before its public release. We then report the proportion of bugs on which these type systems JavaScript programs with few modifications, enables us to reported an error. under-approximately quantify the beneficial impact of static Evaluating static type systems against public bugs, which type systems on code quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle® Developer Studio 12.6
    ® Oracle Developer Studio 12.6: C++ User's Guide Part No: E77789 July 2017 Oracle Developer Studio 12.6: C++ User's Guide Part No: E77789 Copyright © 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, delivered to U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, use, duplication, disclosure, modification, and adaptation of the programs, including any operating system, integrated software, any programs installed on the hardware, and/or documentation, shall be subject to license terms and license restrictions applicable to the programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Safejava: a Unified Type System for Safe Programming
    SafeJava: A Unified Type System for Safe Programming by Chandrasekhar Boyapati B.Tech. Indian Institute of Technology, Madras (1996) S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1998) Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2004 °c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2004. All rights reserved. Author............................................................................ Chandrasekhar Boyapati Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science February 2, 2004 Certified by........................................................................ Martin C. Rinard Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by....................................................................... Arthur C. Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students SafeJava: A Unified Type System for Safe Programming by Chandrasekhar Boyapati Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on February 2, 2004, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Making software reliable is one of the most important technological challenges facing our society today. This thesis presents a new type system that addresses this problem by statically preventing several important classes of programming errors. If a program type checks, we guarantee at compile time that the program
    [Show full text]
  • Programming by Brian W
    6sun® • microsystems PrograInIning Utilities for the Sun Workstation® Sun Microsystems, Inc. • 2550 Garcia Avenue • Mountain View, CA 94043 • 415-960-1300 Credits and Acknowledgements The chapters of this manual were originally derived from the work of many people at Bell Laboratories, the Univer­ sity of California at Berkeley', and other noble institutions. Their names and the titles of the original works appear here. UNIX Programming by Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Lint, a C Program Checker by S. C. Johnson, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Make -A Program for Maintaining Computer Programs by S. I. Feldman, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. The M4 Macro Processor by Brian W. Kernighan and Dennis M. Ritchie, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Lex - A Lexical Analyzer Generator by M. E. Lesk and E. Schmidt, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Yacc - Yet Another Compiler-Compiler by Stephen C. Johnson, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey. Source Code Control System User's Guide by L. E. Bonanni and C. A. Salemi, Bell Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey. Source Code Control System by Eric Allman, Formerly of Project Ingres, University of California at Berkeley. Trademarks Multibus is a trademark of Intel Corporation. Sun Workstation is a trademark of Sun Microsystems Incorporated. UNIX is a trademark of Bell Laboratories. Copyright © 1983, 1984, 1985, by Sun Microsystems. This publication is protected by Federal Copyright Law, with all rights reserved. No part of this publica­ tion may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, translated, transcribed, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means manual, electric, electronic, electro-magnetic, mechanical, chemical, optical, or otherwise, without prior explicit written permission from Sun Microsystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lint, a C Program Checker Lint, a C
    Lint, a C Program Checker Fr ans Kunst Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Afstudeer verslag 18 mei 1988 Lint, a C Program Checker Fr ans Kunst Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam This document describes an implementation of a program which does an extensive consistencyand plausibility check on a set of C program files. This may lead to warnings which help the programmer to debug the program, to remove useless code and to improve his style. The program has been used to test itself and has found bugs in sources of some heavily used code. -2- Contents 1. Introduction 2. Outline of the program 3. What lint checks 3.1 Set, used and unused variables 3.2 Flowofcontrol 3.3 Functions 3.4 Undefined evaluation order 3.5 Pointer alignment problems 3.6 Libraries 4. Howlint checks 4.1 The first pass data structure 4.2 The first pass checking mechanism 4.3 The second pass data structure 4.4 The second pass checking mechanism 5. Howtomakelint shut up 6. User options 7. Ideas for further development 8. Testing the program 9. References Appendix A − The warnings Appendix B − The Ten Commandments for C programmers -3- 1. Introduction C[1][2] is a dangerous programming language. The programmer is allowed to do almost anything, as long as the syntax of the program is correct. This has a reason. In this way it is possible to makeafast compiler which produces fast code. The compiler will be fast because it doesn’tdomuch checking at com- pile time. The code is fast because the compiler doesn’tgenerate run time checks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortran Programming Guide
    Sun Studio 12: Fortran Programming Guide Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. Part No: 819–5262 Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. All rights reserved. Sun Microsystems, Inc. has intellectual property rights relating to technology embodied in the product that is described in this document. In particular, and without limitation, these intellectual property rights may include one or more U.S. patents or pending patent applications in the U.S. and in other countries. U.S. Government Rights – Commercial software. Government users are subject to the Sun Microsystems, Inc. standard license agreement and applicable provisions of the FAR and its supplements. This distribution may include materials developed by third parties. Parts of the product may be derived from Berkeley BSD systems, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, the Solaris logo, the Java Coffee Cup logo, docs.sun.com, Java, and Solaris are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. The OPEN LOOK and SunTM Graphical User Interface was developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its users and licensees. Sun acknowledges the pioneering efforts of Xerox in researching and developing the concept of visual or graphical user interfaces for the computer industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The TRUTH About How Codesonar Compares to PC-Lint
    The TRUTH About How CodeSonar Compares to PC-lint Gimpel Software Version 1, May 2016 As the recognized leader and standard bearer in the static analysis industry, we are flattered to be considered as a benchmark in many product comparisons. While we rarely find it necessary to respond to them, the Grammatech “white paper” comparing the CodeSonar product to PC-lint has the odious distinction of being an exception. Instead of focusing on the perceived merits of the Grammatech product, the white paper in question resorts to false claims and misrepresentations about PC-lint, perhaps as a result of marketplace pressure, which we feel should be balanced with a healthy dose of reality. About PC-lint PC-lint is a powerful and reputable C and C++ static analysis tool created by Gimpel Software in 1985 and continually improved during the past 30 years. During this time PC-lint has been an innovative leader in the industry by incorporating pioneering features such as inter-function and inter-module Value Tracking, Strong Type Checking and Dimensional Analysis, and User-Defined Function Semantics. PC-lint is trusted by many tens of thousands of developers, QA analysts, software testers, and forensic analysts and supports dozens of compilers and platforms, sports dozens of secondary features, and is deployed worldwide in virtually every industry including safety critical fields such as medical and automotive. About Grammatech’s white paper The white paper entitled “How CodeSonar Compares To PC-lint (And Similar Tools)”, avail- able from Grammatech’s website, purports to provide a comparison between the CodeSonar product and PC-lint (other tools are discussed but the focus is on PC-lint) but in reality is nothing more than a series of self-serving, misleading statements having little or no factual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • C Programmer's Guide
    C Programmer's Guide Part Number: 800-3844-10 Revision A of 27 March, 1990 Trademarks Sun Workstation® is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Incorporated. SunOS1M is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Incorporated. Copyright © 1989 Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Printed in U.S.A. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by copyright hereon may be reproduced in any fonn or by any means - graphic, electronic, or mechanical - including photocopying, recording, taping, or storage in an infonnation retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner. Restricted rights legend: use, duplication, or disclosure by the U.S. government is subject to restrictions set forth in subparagraph (c)(I)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 52.227-7013 and in similar clauses in the FAR and NASA FAR Supplement. The Sun Graphical User Interface was developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its users and licensees. Sun ack­ nowledges the pioneering efforts of Xerox in researching and developing the concept of visual or graphical user inter­ faces for the computer industry. Sun holds a non-exclusive license from Xerox to the Xerox Graphical User Interface, which license also covers Sun's licensees. This product is protected by one or more of the following U.S. patents: 4,777,485 4,688,190 4,527,232 4,745,407 4,679,0144,435,7924,719,5694,550,368 in addition to foreign patents and applications pending. • eo: Contents Chapter 1 U sing The Sun C Compiler ...................................................................... 1 1.1. Basics - Compiling and Running C Programs ...........................................
    [Show full text]