DOCSLIB.ORG

Dixie Meadows Geothermal Utilization Project Environmental Assessment I Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dixie Meadows Geothermal Utilization Project Environmental Assessment I Table of Contents Stillwater Field Office, Nevada ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ORNI 32, LLC Dixie Meadows Geothermal Utilization Project DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2016-0014-EA US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City District Stillwater Field Office 5665 Morgan Mill Road Carson City, NV 89701 775-885-6000 Cooperating Agencies: Nevada Department of Wildlife US Fish and Wildlife Service US Navy, Naval Air Station Fallon May 2017 It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2016-0014-EA TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED .......................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................ 1-8 1.4 Land Use Plan Conformance Statement ................................................................................. 1-8 1.5 Relationship to Laws, Regulations, Policies, Plans, and Other Environmental Analyses .......................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.1 Relationship to Other Environmental Analyses ................................................... 1-11 1.5.2 Regulatory Permits and Approvals .......................................................................... 1-12 1.6 Decision to Be Made .................................................................................................................. 1-12 2. PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Proposed Action (Northern Gen-tie Route) ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Schedule of Activities .................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.2 Exploration Wells .......................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1.3 Power Plants and Ancillary Facilities ......................................................................... 2-7 2.1.4 Production Wells, Pipelines, Access Roads, and Support Facilities ................. 2-11 2.1.5 Gen-Tie .......................................................................................................................... 2-18 2.1.6 Environmental Protection Measures ....................................................................... 2-23 2.2 Alternative 1 (Southern Gen-Tie Route) .............................................................................. 2-34 2.2.1 Route Description ....................................................................................................... 2-34 2.2.2 Components ................................................................................................................. 2-36 2.2.3 ROW Width Requirements ...................................................................................... 2-36 2.2.4 Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning ................................................ 2-36 2.2.5 Restoration and Reclamation .................................................................................... 2-36 2.2.6 Environmental Protection Measures ....................................................................... 2-37 2.3 Alternatives Considered but not Analyzed in Detail ......................................................... 2-37 2.4 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................... 2-37 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .......................... 3-1 3.1 Scoping and Issue Identification ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Supplemental Authorities ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Resources Other Than Supplemental Authorities ................................................ 3-3 3.1.3 Resources or Uses Present and Brought Forward for Analysis ......................... 3-5 3.2 Air Quality ...................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................... 3-6 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................... 3-6 3.3 Water Resources .......................................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................... 3-7 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-19 3.4 Soil Resources ............................................................................................................................. 3-25 3.4.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-25 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-35 3.5 Migratory Birds ............................................................................................................................ 3-39 3.5.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-39 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-42 May 2017 Dixie Meadows Geothermal Utilization Project Environmental Assessment i Table of Contents 3.6 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 3-46 3.6.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-46 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-48 3.7 Wildlife and Key Habitat ........................................................................................................... 3-50 3.7.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-50 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-53 3.8 BLM Sensitive Species ................................................................................................................ 3-57 3.8.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-58 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-78 3.9 Wetlands and Riparian Areas .................................................................................................. 3-88 3.9.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-88 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-90 3.10 Invasive, Nonnative, and Noxious Weed Species ............................................................... 3-95 3.10.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-95 3.10.2 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................. 3-96 3.11 Visual Resources ......................................................................................................................... 3-96 3.11.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................................. 3-96 3.11.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................... 3-101 3.12 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................. 3-103 3.12.1 Affected Environment .............................................................................................. 3-103 3.12.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................... 3-105 3.13 Native American Religious Concerns ................................................................................. 3-107 3.13.1 Affected Environment .............................................................................................. 3-107 3.13.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................... 3-110 3.14 Travel Management ................................................................................................................. 3-111 3.14.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts
    water Article Springs and Springs-Dependent Taxa of the Colorado River Basin, Southwestern North America: Geography, Ecology and Human Impacts Lawrence E. Stevens * , Jeffrey Jenness and Jeri D. Ledbetter Springs Stewardship Institute, Museum of Northern Arizona, 3101 N. Ft. Valley Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA; Jeff@SpringStewardship.org (J.J.); [email protected] (J.D.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 April 2020; Accepted: 12 May 2020; Published: 24 May 2020 Abstract: The Colorado River basin (CRB), the primary water source for southwestern North America, is divided into the 283,384 km2, water-exporting Upper CRB (UCRB) in the Colorado Plateau geologic province, and the 344,440 km2, water-receiving Lower CRB (LCRB) in the Basin and Range geologic province. Long-regarded as a snowmelt-fed river system, approximately half of the river’s baseflow is derived from groundwater, much of it through springs. CRB springs are important for biota, culture, and the economy, but are highly threatened by a wide array of anthropogenic factors. We used existing literature, available databases, and field data to synthesize information on the distribution, ecohydrology, biodiversity, status, and potential socio-economic impacts of 20,872 reported CRB springs in relation to permanent stream distribution, human population growth, and climate change. CRB springs are patchily distributed, with highest density in montane and cliff-dominated landscapes. Mapping data quality is highly variable and many springs remain undocumented. Most CRB springs-influenced habitats are small, with a highly variable mean area of 2200 m2, generating an estimated total springs habitat area of 45.4 km2 (0.007% of the total CRB land area).
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (CESCF) Traditional Conservation Grants Program Notice of Funding Opportunity
    FY 2020 Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund (CESCF) Traditional Conservation Grants Program Notice of Funding Opportunity Notice of Funding Opportunity Number: F20AS00070 Federal Program: Department of the Interior, United States (U.S.) Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services & Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 15.615 Authorizing Legislation Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1535, as amended Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: We are collecting this information in accordance with the authorizing legislation identified above. Your response is required to obtain or retain a benefit. We will use the information you provide to conduct a competitive review and select projects for funding and, if awarded, to evaluate performance. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. We estimate that it will take you on average about 40 hours to complete an initial application, about 3 hours to revise the terms of an award, and about 8 hours per report to prepare and submit financial and performance reports, including time to maintain records and gather information. Actual time for these activities will vary depending on program-specific requirements. You may send comments on the burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803. OMB Control Number: 1018-0100 (Expiration Date: 7/31/2021) I. Program Description More than half of all species listed as endangered or threatened spend at least part of their life cycle on non-federal lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Empsi Document Template
    US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City District, Nevada March 2013 Carson City District Resource Management Plan Revision Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Report on the Application of the Relevance and Importance Criteria TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 II. REQUIREMENTS FOR ACEC DESIGNATION ...................................................................... 4 III. SPECIAL MANAGEMENT ATTENTION ............................................................................... 8 IV. EVALUATION PROCESS ..................................................................................................... 8 V. LIST OF PREPARERS ......................................................................................................... 36 APPENDICES A Maps of ACECs Recommended for Further Analysis in the Draft RMP TABLES Page 1 Proposed ACECs Found to Meet the Relevance and Importance Criteria ...................................... 6 2 Summary of the Existing and Proposed ACECs in the Planning Area Determined to Meet the Relevance and Importance Criteria ......................................................................................................... 10 3 Summary of the Proposed ACECs in the Planning Area Determined Not to Meet the
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie Meadows Geothermal Utilization Project Environmental Assessment
    Appendix D Biological Survey Reports EMPSi 2016; WRC 2013; ESRS 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Biological Survey Report ORNI 32, LLC DIXIE MEADOWS GEOTHERMAL UTILIZATION PROJECT PERSHING AND CHURCHILL COUNTIES, NEVADA July 2016 Environmental Management and Planning Solutions, Inc. 4741 Caughlin Parkway, Suite 4 Reno, Nevada 89519 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Regional and Geographic Overview ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.1 Ground Survey ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3.2 Golden Eagle Aerial Survey ......................................................................................... 1-5 2. VEGETATION ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Vegetation Types within the Project Area ............................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Inter-Mountain Basins Mixed Salt Desert Scrub ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inferring Presence of the Western Toad (Anaxyrus Boreas) Species Complex Using Environmental DNA
    Global Ecology and Conservation 15 (2018) e00438 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Short Communication Inferring presence of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas) species complex using environmental DNA * Thomas W. Franklin a, , Joseph C. Dysthe a, Michael Golden b, Kevin S. McKelvey a, Blake R. Hossack c, Kellie J. Carim a, Cynthia Tait d, Michael K. Young a, Michael K. Schwartz a a U.S. Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 E. Beckwith Ave., Missoula, MT, 59801, USA b U.S. Forest Service, Dixie National Forest, 1789 N. Wedgewood Ln., Cedar City, UT, 84721, USA c U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, 800 E. Beckwith Ave., Missoula, MT, 59801, USA d U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Region, 324 25th St., Ogden, UT, 84401, USA article info abstract Article history: Western toads (species complex comprised of Anaxyrus boreas, A. canorus, A. exsul, and A. Received 2 May 2018 nelsoni) are widely distributed in the western United States but are declining, particularly Received in revised form 6 September 2018 in the southeastern extent of their range. The subspecies A. b. boreas is listed as a Species of Accepted 6 September 2018 Greatest Conservation Need in New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Reliable and sensitive methods for delineating distributions of western toads are critical for monitoring Keywords: the status of the species and prioritizing conservation efforts. We developed two qPCR eDNA assays for detecting western toad DNA in environmental DNA samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Eureka Resident Receives the Gift of Mobility
    SERVING THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1870 Vol. 148, No. 28 the week of june 28, 2018 50¢ nevada development community Water issues Eureka resident receives continue to stall progress at the gift of mobility Eureka resident Pamela medical equipment to Northern Coyote Springs Lyninger received the gift of Nevadans. People are asked to mobility on June 21, when the donate equipment and/or make By Dave Maxwell Northern Nevada Center for monetary donations to NNCIL, Independent Living (NNCIL) so they can help even more Lack of water might just end delivered to her a motorized, Northern Nevadans. the dream of a Coyote Springs rough-terrain wheelchair. NNCIL Independent Living master-planned community. “I’m pretty much trapped at Advocate Hentjie Apag deliv- A recent article in the Las home now and this chair will ered the chair to Lyninger. “It’s Vegas Review-Journal noted, give me the ability to get outside incredibly gratifying being able “Nevada’s state water engineer and putt around town,” she to help people like Pam have is blocking construction at Coy- shares. some freedom,” Apag said. “It’s ote because he says there isn’t Lyninger suffered a brain amazing what something as enough water to support the aneurysm in 2004. During sur- simple as a wheelchair can do.” project.” gery, it popped, leaving her with The Northern Nevada Cen- Jason King, the state water en- hemiplegia, which is a form of ter for Independent Living gineer, sent a letter in early June paralysis affecting the left side (NNCIL) was founded more to Coyote Springs Investments of her body.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Energy and Wildlife Research Annual Report for 2019
    U.S. Geological Survey Energy and Wildlife Research Annual Report for 2019 Circular 1458 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Top left: Wind energy facility in White Pine County, Nevada (photograph by Alan Cressler, U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]). Top right: Solar energy facility in Colorado (photograph by Jessica Robertson, USGS). Bottom left: Oil production in Montana (photograph by Lawrence Igl, USGS). Bottom right: Hydroelectric power plant in Glendo State Park, Wyoming (photograph from Wikimedia, Creative Commons 3.0). Center from top to bottom: Golden eagle fitted with Global Positioning System backpack (photograph by USGS); Hawaiian hoary bat (photograph by Frank Bonaccorso, USGS); Pronghorn (photograph by National Park Service); Brook trout (photograph by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). U.S. Geological Survey Energy and Wildlife Research Annual Report for 2019 Edited by Mona Khalil Three caribou standing in the tundra in Alaska. Photograph by Andrew Ramey, U.S. Geological Survey. Circular 1458 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiny Northern Nevada Toad Part of Massive Endangered Species Lawsuit
    Tiny Northern Nevada toad part of massive endangered species lawsuit Benjamin Spillman, Reno Gazette Journal Nov. 27, 2019 Conservation group accuses Trump adminis- tration of being slow to protect wildlife and habitat in Nevada and beyond Nevada’s tiny Dixie Valley Toad is among the plants and animals included in a massive law- suit over the Endangered Species Act. The toad is one of 274 plants and animals included in the lawsuit by the Center for Biological Diversity, which claims the Trump administration refuses to enforce the landmark conservation law. A proposed geothermal project 43 miles northeast of The toad’s habitat is limited to about 1,500 Fallon could be harmful to the rare Dixie Valley toad. acres known as Dixie Meadows in Dixie Valley, (Photo: Patrick Donnelly/Center for Biological Diversity) a remote valley east of Fallon. A proposed geothermal project 43 miles north- The Bureau of Land Management is proposing a lease sale east of Fallon could be harmful to the rare on about 80,000 acres of land in the general vicinity of the Dixie Valley toad. meadows. In addition to supporting the toad, the valley is The land is further from toad habitat than a previous geo- a hotbed of geothermal activity. In recent years thermal power that appears to have stalled. the area has been targeted as a site for potential development of geothermal power plants. But it is a threat to the toad nonetheless, said Patrick Don- nelly, Nevada director for the Center for Biological Diver- Energy development could put the toad at risk sity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie Meadows Geothermal Exploration Project
    Stillwater Field Office, Nevada FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ormat Technologies, Inc. Dixie Meadows Geothermal Exploration Project DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0516-EA U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Carson City District Stillwater Field Office 5665 Morgan Mill Road Carson City, NV 89701 775-885-6000 December 2011 It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DOI-BLM-NV-C010-2011-0516-EA DIXIE MEADOWS GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION PROJECT – ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DECEMBER 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE AND NEED ....................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED ..................................................................................................3 1.2 LAND USE PLAN CONFORMANCE STATEMENT ..........................................................4 1.3 PLANS, STATUTES, AND OTHER REGULATIONS .........................................................4 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES.............................................................5 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION ...................................................................................................5 2.1.1 Project Access ..............................................................................................6 2.1.2 Operations Plan ............................................................................................8 2.1.2.1
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sierra National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Natural Resources Specialists Regional Office, Sierra National Forest and Washington Office Enterprise Program for: Sierra National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Petition to List Dixie Valley Toad Under The
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR Photo Credit: Patrick Donnelly/Center for Biological Diversity PETITION TO LIST THE DIXIE VALLEY TOAD (BUFO (ANAXYRUS) WILLIAMSI) AS A THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT September 18, 2017 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY NOTICE OF PETITION Ryan Zinke, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Greg Sheehan, Acting Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Paul Souza, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825 [email protected] PETITIONERS Jenny Loda Amphibian and Reptile Staff Attorney Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway St, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 844-7100 x 336 [email protected] Patrick Donnelly Nevada State Director Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 364414 North Las Vegas, NV 89036 (702) 483-0449 [email protected] 2 Submitted this 18th of September, 2017 Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b); section 553(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 553(e); and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity, Jenny Loda and Patrick Donnelly hereby petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS or Service), to protect the Dixie Valley toad (Bufo (Anaxyrus) williamsi) as a threatened or endangered species. Petitioners request emergency listing of the Dixie Valley toad at the soonest possible time, in light of the impending threat of geothermal energy production in its range.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorized Course of Instruction for the Quinmester Program. Science: the World of Animals,Animal Life, Four Legged and Otherwise
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 063 120 SE 013 644 TITLE Authorized Course of Instruction for the Quinmester Program. Science: The World of Animals,Animal Life, Four Legged and Otherwise. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 79p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Biology; Ecology; *Instruction; *Objectives; Secondary School Science; *Teaching Guides; Units of Study (Subject Fields) IDENTIFIERS Quinmester Program ABSTRACT This instructional package contains three animallife units developed for the Dade CountyFlorida Quinmester Program. "The World of Animals" is a survey course ofthe animal kingdom (excluding man) and involves the students in manylaboratory investigations and group activities. Typicalanimals of South Florida and unusual animals of the world are studied. "Animal Life"includes recognition and characteristics of harndul and beneficialanimals, natural communities, and energy relationships. "Four Leggedand Othe-wise" is an elementary course in generalzoology with emphasis on the economic value of the fauna of South Florida, ecologicalrelationships, and the effects of pollution. Each booklet includesperformance objectives for the unit, lists state-adopted texts,provides a synoptic summary of the course content, suggestsactivities and projects, indicates audio-visual materials availablein the county and from other sources, and recommends referencebooks. Each booklet contains a chart relating each suggested activity tospecific performance objectives. (CP) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY. I% AUTHORIZED COURSE OF INSTRUCTIONFOR THE Ul THE WORLD OF ANIMALS 311.17 5312.17 533.3 .17 SCIENCE (Experimental) DIVISION OF INSTRUCTION1911 I.
    [Show full text]