DOCSLIB.ORG

Interactive Qualifying Project Cold Fusion: the Impact on Society and the Reaction from the Scientific World Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interactive Qualifying Project Cold Fusion: the Impact on Society and the Reaction from the Scientific World Final Report Interactive Qualifying Project Cold Fusion: The Impact on Society and the Reaction from the Scientific World Final Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: Landon Airey Kevin Conley Date: May 1, 2013 Advisor: Professor Alexander Emanuel 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Background Understanding ...................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Notes from Professor Cyganski’s CF PowerPoint Presentation .......................................................... 6 3.2 More Technical Background ............................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Even More Technical Background ........................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4 Events from 1900 to Present ............................................................................................................ 17 3.5 Pons and Fleischmann Technical Analysis ........................................................................................ 10 3.6 MIT’s Dispute with Physicists ............................................................................................................ 19 4. Where We Are Today .............................................................................................................................. 21 4.1 Literary Research .............................................................................................................................. 27 4.2 MIT Visit/ How It Works .................................................................................................................... 32 4.3 Pons and Fleischmann Experiment Today ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5. Crystal Ball Overview .............................................................................................................................. 38 5.1 Future Event Timeline ....................................................................................................................... 38 5.2 Residential ......................................................................................................................................... 41 5.2.1 Cost Analysis - Power Plant, local or large central stations? ..................................................... 46 5.3 Commercial ....................................................................................................................................... 50 5.4 Military .............................................................................................................................................. 54 5.5 Analysis of “Cold Fusion and the Future” by Jed Rothwell ............................................................... 57 6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 63 6.1 Our Opinions ..................................................................................................................................... 63 6.1.1 Landon’s Opinion on How Cold Fusion Could Realistically Work .............................................. 67 6.1.2 Kevin’s Opinion on How Cold Fusion Could Realistically Work ................................................. 70 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................ 74 Appendix ........................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. Editors Notes (not for final copy) ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2 | P a g e TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: C old Fusion Cutaway Cell ............................................................................................................ 12 Figure 2: Excess Power and Current Density vs Time of Light and Heavy Water Cells ............................... 13 Figure 3: Detailed Cutaway of Pons and Fleischmann’s Cell ...................................................................... 14 Figure 4: Chemical Component Diagram and Hypothetical Cold Fusion Stoichiometry ............................ 15 Figure 5: Detailed Component Listing of ECat Device Chamber ................................................................. 16 Figure 6: Comparison Chart for Different Energy Sources .......................................................................... 59 Figure 7: Identity Crisis Nametag ................................................................................................................ 67 Figure 8: Exploded View of a Catalyst Induced Hydrino Transition Cell ..................................................... 69 Figure 9: Humorous Hydrino - Hydrogen Comparison ............................................................................... 70 Figure 10: Illustration of Hydrogen Atoms Electro Chemically Forced into a Lattice Structure ................. 71 3 | P a g e 1. Abstract This study aims to bring the reader to speed with the events that have transpired in the cold fusion community as well as its impact on society. Part of the project involves how society responded to the Pons and Fleischmann report in 1989. Then experimental setups and scientific theories behind the technology were investigated to provide insights as to which are most feasible, and the potential uses of each method. Lastly, this project speculated what would change in today’s society if this technology were to become marketable soon. 4 | P a g e 2. Executive Summary Cold Fusion: What is its feasibility in the near future and how would it impact our society? Nuclear fusion is said to occur when the nuclei of two atoms combine resulting in one new atom. Fusion releases large amounts of energy; the heat and light produced by the sun is the result of the fusion of two Hydrogen atoms into one Helium atom. Cold fusion is a process in which nuclear fusion takes place, except instead of taking place at or near the temperature of the surface of the sun, it occurs at a temperature sustainable in a laboratory setting. In 1989, two electrochemists named Pons and Fleischmann brought cold fusion to the forefront of interest of the scientific world. They devised an experiment that was conducted on a table in front of an audience with claims that sounded too good to be true: claims that they had “solved” cold fusion. It turns out that the Pons and Fleischmann experiment did not function as reported. After twenty four years and hundreds of other experiments, there are still many unknowns in the field of cold fusion, though appears that we may be on the brink of discovery with this topic. The target audience of this research matter is power energy engineers as well as energy generation scientists. This is a very relevant topic because its impact would affect everyday life; the cost of electricity can skyrocket when public demand is high (this generally occurs between the hours of 10am and 4pm). This effect could be combated with arrays of cold fusion plants which could produce enormous sums of environmentally friendly energy at little cost. 5 | P a g e 3. Background Understanding 3.1 Notes from Professor Cyganski’s CF PowerPoint Presentation Cold fusion is a very controversial topic in the media, and scientific world. Since the Pons and Fleischmann announcement in 1989, any work in the field of cold fusion looked upon skeptically. Often times experiments are not discussed except within the company of other cold fusion researchers for fear of being labeled a mad scientist. To gain a better understanding of why this is such a desirable phenomenon, the “big picture” of cold fusion must be investigated. Cold fusion is the combining two nuclei to release energy. This can be configured in such a way that the excess heat turns water into steam which then spins turbines to generate electricity. The bi-product of such a fusion is Helium, which is essentially harmless (especially when compared to the alternative of Carbon Dioxide) Gravitation, magnetic confinement: huge magnetic fields which hold deuterium and cause fusion to take place, magnetic confinement usually takes up a vast amount of physical space. Also, it needs to generate such large magnetic fields that the system consumes more power than it outputs, making it useless for an energy production point of view. Valuable information on Pons and Fleischmann was also obtained from viewing this presentation.). On March 23, 1989, two electro-chemists called a press conference to make an amazing announcement. This unorthodox method of delivering scientific news boosted excitement, as publishing a paper is the status quo in the scientific world. Pons and Fleischmann reported that they had achieved and repeated experiments that produce cold 6 | P a g e fusion at relatively low cost. The experiment called for heavy water (water with heavy hydrogen, or hydrogen with an extra neutron) in a bottle is suspended in H20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thermonuclear AB-Reactors for Aerospace
    1 Article Micro Thermonuclear Reactor after Ct 9 18 06 AIAA-2006-8104 Micro -Thermonuclear AB-Reactors for Aerospace* Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F-6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718-339-4563, [email protected], [email protected], http://Bolonkin.narod.ru Abstract About fifty years ago, scientists conducted R&D of a thermonuclear reactor that promises a true revolution in the energy industry and, especially, in aerospace. Using such a reactor, aircraft could undertake flights of very long distance and for extended periods and that, of course, decreases a significant cost of aerial transportation, allowing the saving of ever-more expensive imported oil-based fuels. (As of mid-2006, the USA’s DoD has a program to make aircraft fuel from domestic natural gas sources.) The temperature and pressure required for any particular fuel to fuse is known as the Lawson criterion L. Lawson criterion relates to plasma production temperature, plasma density and time. The thermonuclear reaction is realised when L > 1014. There are two main methods of nuclear fusion: inertial confinement fusion (ICF) and magnetic confinement fusion (MCF). Existing thermonuclear reactors are very complex, expensive, large, and heavy. They cannot achieve the Lawson criterion. The author offers several innovations that he first suggested publicly early in 1983 for the AB multi- reflex engine, space propulsion, getting energy from plasma, etc. (see: A. Bolonkin, Non-Rocket Space Launch and Flight, Elsevier, London, 2006, Chapters 12, 3A). It is the micro-thermonuclear AB- Reactors. That is new micro-thermonuclear reactor with very small fuel pellet that uses plasma confinement generated by multi-reflection of laser beam or its own magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Trivia Questions
    TRIVIA QUESTIONS Submitted by: ANS Savannah River - A. Bryson, D. Hanson, B. Lenz, M. Mewborn 1. What was the code name used for the first U.S. test of a dry fuel hydrogen bomb? Castle Bravo 2. What was the name of world’s first artificial nuclear reactor to achieve criticality? Chicago Pile-1 (CP-1), I also seem to recall seeing/hearing them referred to as “number one,” “number two,” etc. 3. How much time elapsed between the first known sustained nuclear chain reaction at the University of Chicago and the _____ Option 1: {first use of this new technology as a weapon} or Option 2: {dropping of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima} A3) First chain reaction = December 2nd 1942, First bomb-drop = August 6th 1945 4. Some sort of question drawing info from the below tables. For example, “what were the names of the other aircraft that accompanied the Enola Gay (one point for each correct aircraft name)?” Another example, “What was the common word in the call sign of the pilots who flew the Japanese bombing missions?” A4) Screenshots of tables from the Wikipedia page “Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki” Savannah River Trivia / Page 1 of 18 5. True or False: Richard Feynman’s name is on the patent for a nuclear powered airplane? (True) 6. What is the Insectary of Bobo-Dioulasso doing to reduce the spread of sleeping sickness and wasting diseases that affect cattle using a nuclear technique? (Sterilizing tsetse flies; IAEA.org) 7. What was the name of the organization that studied that radiological effects on people after the atomic bombings? Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Definition
    Marin Erceg dipl.oec. CEO ORCA TEHNOLOGIJE http://www.orca-technologies.com Zagreb, 2006. Editor : mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. aeronautike-pilot Text review : dr.sc. Zlatko Renduli ć dipl.ing. mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. aeronautike-pilot Danijel Vukovi ć dipl.ing. zrakoplovstva Translation review : Dana Vukovi ć, prof. engl. i hrv. jez. i knjiž. Graphic and html design : mr.sc. Tino Jelavi ć dipl.ing. Publisher : JET MANGA Ltd. for space transport and services http://www.yuairwar.com/erceg.asp ISBN : 953-99838-5-1 2 Contents Introduction Defining the problem Size factor Eccentricity issue Planemos and fusors Clear explanation of our Solar system Planet definition Free floating planets Conclusion References Curriculum Vitae 3 Introduction For several thousand years humans were aware of planets. While sitting by the fire, humans were observing the sky and the stars even since prehistory. They noticed that several sparks out of thousands of stars were oddly behaving, moving around the sky across irregular paths. They were named planets. Definition of the planet at that time was simple and it could have been expressed by following sentence: Sparkling dot in the sky whose relative position to the other stars is continuously changing following unpredictable paths. During millenniums and especially upon telescope discovery, human understanding of celestial bodies became deeper and deeper. This also meant that people understood better the space and our Solar system and in this period we have accepted the following definition of the planet: Round objects orbiting Sun. Following Ceres and Asteroid Belt discoveries this definition was not suitable any longer, and as a result it was modified.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion – a Viable Energy Source – Questionable? 1.1 Plasma Physics and Associated Fusion Research
    Dr. David R. Thayer Talk given at the: Sigma Pi Sigma Induction Ceremony UW Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, 4/28/14 Fusion – A Viable Energy Source – Questionable? 1.1 Plasma Physics and Associated Fusion Research Began Around 1950 (in Russia) To Produce energy from Thermonuclear Fusion (Which Powers Stars). The Key Nuclear Reaction at the heart of fusion physics as the Fusion Of Deuterium (D) and Tritium (T) Ions, D+T 4 He 3.5MeV +n 14.1MeV , D-T - Liberates 17.6MeV Of Energy in Alpha Particle (Helium Nucleus, 4 He) and High Energy Neutron (n). D T n 1 1.2 Typical Conditions which produce fusion reaction Incorporate Plasma (High Temperature Gas of Electrons & Ions) Nuclear Ingredients at conditions: Density of n 1020 m 3, Temperature of T 10keV Objective: Overcome D-T Electrostatic Repulsion: D T Ignition (fusion sustained) Metric-Lawson Criteria: Density (ne )*Energy Confinement Time ( E ) = ne E Lawson Criteria 20 3 nme 10 E 1s 20 3 ne E 10 m s For D-T Fusion Te 10 keV or Approx. 100M degree C 2 1.3 Fusion Reactions Occur Naturally In Stars, due to tremendous Gravitation Forces, Fg m , which Radially Confine Plasma - Allow Sustained Fusion. However, Laboratory Fusion Plasmas must utilize Electromagnetic Forces, Fq E v B, typically Achieved Using: 1) Toroidal Magnetic Field Devices – Tokamak – Large Confining B Fields; or 2) Inertial Confinement Fusion – ICF – Devices numerous large Lasers Provide Implosion Pressure. 1) ITER – International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor 2) NIF – National Ignition Facility Lasers Hohlraum Contains
    [Show full text]
  • The Farnsworth/Hirsch Fusor
    The Farnsworth/Hirsch Fusor How a Small Vacuum System and a Bit of Basketweaving Will Get You a Working Inertial-Electrostatic Confinement Neutron Source Richard Hull Tesla Coil Builders of Richmond, 7103 Hermitage Rd., Richmond, VA 23228 I. SUMMARY as more ions impact at higher velocities. In this volume it is reasonable to assume that most impacts result in The device that is described in this article is a dual grid, additional multiple ionizations adding many pluses to the inertial-electrostatic confinement (IEC) accelerator which ions contained in the small volume of the plasmoid. can, with various levels of cash expenditures, different The excess electrons now find themselves in a included gases, different operating pressures, various negative potential well and are ejected violently back applied voltages and currents, etc. be used as a glow into the region between the grids. Ions also flow out with discharge mode “plasma sphere,” a gas diode, an ion the electrons in a mixed stream, many recombining and multipactor or even a device for producing nuclear colliding with gas atoms outside the inner grid forming fusion reactions. This article describes the history of the neutrals in a kinetic stream and ionizing anew. At lower device, the principles of its operation, uses and operating pressures, the ionized gas atoms are thinned construction of a working fusor. Possibilities for further out and some actually never interact. exploration by amateurs is also covered. The “fusor” can work in several modes based on the materials used, the gas included in the device, and the II. INTRODUCTION pressure of the gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Polywell – a Path to Electrostatic Fusion
    Polywell – A Path to Electrostatic Fusion Jaeyoung Park Energy Matter Conversion Corporation (EMC2) University of Wisconsin, October 1, 2014 1 Fusion vs. Solar Power For a 50 cm radius spherical IEC device - Area projection: πr2 = 7850 cm2 à 160 watt for same size solar panel Pfusion =17.6MeV × ∫ < συ >×(nDnT )dV For D-T: 160 Watt à 5.7x1013 n/s -16 3 <συ>max ~ 8x10 cm /s 11 -3 à <ne>~ 7x10 cm Debye length ~ 0.22 cm (at 60 keV) Radius/λD ~ 220 In comparison, 60 kV well over 50 cm 7 -3 (ne-ni) ~ 4x10 cm 2 200 W/m : available solar panel capacity 0D Analysis - No ion convergence case 2 Outline • Polywell Fusion: - Electrostatic Fusion + Magnetic Confinement • Lessons from WB-8 experiments • Recent Confinement Experiments at EMC2 • Future Work and Summary 3 Electrostatic Fusion Fusor polarity Contributions from Farnsworth, Hirsch, Elmore, Tuck, Watson and others Operating principles (virtual cathode type ) • e-beam (and/or grid) accelerates electrons into center • Injected electrons form a potential well • Potential well accelerates/confines ions Virtual cathode • Energetic ions generate fusion near the center polarity Attributes • No ion grid loss • Good ion confinement & ion acceleration • But loss of high energy electrons is too large 4 Polywell Fusion Combines two good ideas in fusion research: Bussard (1985) a) Electrostatic fusion: High energy electron beams form a potential well, which accelerates and confines ions b) High β magnetic cusp: High energy electron confinement in high β cusp: Bussard termed this as “wiffle-ball” (WB). + + + e- e- e- Potential Well: ion heating &confinement Polyhedral coil cusp: electron confinement 5 Wiffle-Ball (WB) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Simplest Fusion Reactor, and How to Make It Work
    Revision Date: 1/05/2007 The World's Simplest Fusion Reactor, And How to Make It Work by Tom Ligon This article originally appeared in the December 1998 edition of Analog Science Fiction and Fact. Although edited slightly for reprints in Infinite Energy and for posting on fusor.net, it was intended for a fairly broad audience, especially high school science students. Fusor.net has my permission to post this article. Anyone else wishing to post it, ask my permission! This material is copyrighted. Tom Ligon A really distressing trend has been developing for some time among scientifically knowledgeable people I've met. A lot of you are growing quite pessimistic about the prospects for practical fusion power in general, and fusion-powered space travel in particular. The roots of this disillusionment are not hard to find. Fusion, for those of you who slept through high-school physics, is the process of squashing two atomic nuclei together to produce a new element. Many light-weight nuclei give off copious energy when this happens. In the Sun, hydrogen nuclei fuse (we pretend we know the mechanisms) to form helium. A tiny fraction of the original mass is converted to energy according to E = mc2. The process occurs deep in the Sun's core, at mind-boggling temperatures that cause the nuclei to move rapidly, where similarly mind-boggling pressure keeps the nuclei in close proximity, and sheer bulk prevents rapid heat escape. The physics community often calls these "thermonuclear reactions" 1 The World's Simplest Fusion Reactor because of the high temperatures driving them in the Sun, or triggering them in "hydrogen" bombs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at US Fusion Research
    A Look At US Fusion Research US Fusion Budget: The US fusion budget last year was 951 million dollars [1]. For comparison NASAs’ budget was eight billion [2]. I argue that the current fusion budget is very low and lopsided. It is lopsided because it focuses only on two approaches - which we know will not become commercial. It is low, because this budget gives us no space for anything new. Sadly, this has been the state of things for about the last 20 years or so. Below is a plot of the US fusion budget. Laser fusion (ICF): The US fusion budget gets split in half. Half of the money is sent out to support laser fusion and related technologies. The main goal of that money is to maintain the status quo. It holds up activity at the national labs, a few companies and a few universities. Laser fusion is where you take a small ball of ice and you blast it. The ball of ice is frozen radioactive hydrogen. The beams attack from multiple (60 or 192) directions and squash the fuel [3, 4]. When the beams hit the ice surface, there is an explosion of energy outwards and an equal and opposite compression wave inwards. This compresses the fuel to a temperature and pressure where fusion can occur. For example, a typical temperature could be between 10 and 15 million degrees kelvin and the pressure is 1000x the density of water [3, 4]. A typical implosion would last about 20 nanoseconds. This laser approach to fusion is over sixty years old [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Neal Welch and Bill Dewitt Faculty Advisor: Philip T. Mccreanor, Ph.D. Mercer University - School of Engineering, Macon, GA
    freshman Engineering Honors Hydrogen Fusion Using a Farnsworth Fusor Neal Welch and Bill DeWitt Faculty Advisor: Philip T. McCreanor, Ph.D. Mercer University - School of Engineering, Macon, GA Abstract Building a “Star in a Jar” Conclusion and Plans for The Future Humankind has never had a more negative impact on its We used a guide published in a magazine titled Make as the reference for building what would effectively produce the type of nuclear This project was a great way to learn about nuclear and an environment than it has had in the past 125 years. An energy reaction that powers stars. Supplementing this guide, was a website titled “fusor.net” which provided us with in-depth technical and incredible way to physically experience the work, effort, and revolution ignited by the use of fossil fuels has led to safety information to use while building and testing the device. ingenuity that is necessary for making it happen on Earth. As a unprecedented amounts of harmful carbon dioxide in the team, we evolved from seeking a project that concerned energy Earth’s atmosphere. As the world’s population grows at an research to soldering together electrical wire, machining solid ever increasing rate and more and more people are demanding aluminum flanges, building a rectifier out of PVC pipe and more and more energy, science is looked upon to come up common electrical components, and, finally, hitting the difficulty with a solution for this burgeoning demand for energy. Its best of joining two very small diameter stainless-steel wires together answer, so far, is hydrogen fusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Magnetosphere-Stellar Wind Interaction of Close-In Extrasolar Planets
    Aspects of the magnetosphere-stellar wind interaction of close-in extrasolar planets Von der Fakultät für Physik und Geowissenschaften der Technischen Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr.rer.nat.) genehmigte Dissertation von Jean-Mathias Grießmeier aus Kulmbach Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. U. Motschmann 2. Referent: Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. H. O. Rucker eingereicht am: 19. Dezember 2005 mündliche Prüfung (Disputation) am: 16. Februar 2006 Copyright c Copernicus GmbH 2006 ISBN 3-936586-49-7 Copernicus GmbH, Katlenburg-Lindau Druck: Schaltungsdienst Lange, Berlin Printed in Germany Veröffentlichungen von Teilen der Arbeit Teilergebnisse aus dieser Arbeit wurden mit Genehmigung der Fakultät für Physik und Geowissenschaften, vertreten durch die Mentorin oder den Mentor der Arbeit, in folgen- den Beiträgen vorab veröffentlicht: Publikationen: 1. H. Lammer, H. I. M. Lichtenegger, Yu. N. Kulikov, J.-M. Grießmeier, N. Terada, N. V. Erkaev, H. K. Biernat, M. L. Khodachenko, I. Ribas, T. Penz, F. Selsis: CME activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. Part II: CME induced ion pick up of Earth-like exoplanets in close-in habitable zones, Astrobiology, eingereicht (2006). 2. M. L. Khodachenko, I. Ribas, H. Lammer, J.-M. Grießmeier, M. Leitner, F. Selsis, C. Eiroa, A. Hanslmeier, H. K. Biernat, C. J. Farrugia, H. O. Rucker: CME activity of low mass M stars as an important factor for the habitability of terrestrial exo- planets.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusor Team Wins CPS Plasma Excellence Award at Intel ISEF
    PPlalassmama PPageage Published by the Coalition for Plasma Science, Vol.16., No.1, July 2013 Fusor Team wins CPS Plasma Excellence Award at Intel ISEF Phoenix, AZ – “It’s not getting any eas- tion to see if it is ier,” CPS Chair Lee Berry acknowledges spherically symmet- with a smile. Berry, who has helped to ric with reference to select and present the CPS Award for the central focus, as Excellence in Plasma Physics at the Intel expected. International Science and Engineering Fair Mounting neu- since 2005, noted that there are now more tron-sensitive plastic eligible projects with increased plasma- slides and bubble related content, and that the quality of the detectors around the work continues to set new standards. This fusor, the team dis- year three students from Washington state covered that neu- won the admiration of the CPS judges, tron flux was higher earning the Plasma Excellence prize of at the front and rear $1500 for their research on a table-top of the device, lower fusion device. on the sides and Winners Jake Hecla (Aviation High top. These findings School, Des Moines), Raymond Maung would suggest that (Kentwood Senior High School, Coving- some neutrons may ton) and Rian Chandra (Capital High be produced outside Raymond Maung (left), Jake Hecla and Rian Chandra impressed the CPS School, Olympia) all belong to the North- the central plasma, judges with their project, Anisotropic Emission of Neutrons from a west Nuclear Consortium, a small group challenging current Farnsworth IEC Fusion Reactor. Photo/Lee Berry of students with a passion for nuclear assumptions about physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Simulation and Optimization of The
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE CONTINUOUS ELECTRODE INERTIAL ELECTROSTATIC CONFINEMENT FUSOR Andrew M. Chap, Doctor of Philosophy, 2017 Dissertation directed by: Professor Raymond J. Sedwick Department of Aerospace Engineering A concept for generating nuclear fusion power and converting the kinetic en- ergy of aneutronic fusion products into electric energy is proposed, and simulations are developed to design and evaluate this concept. The presented concept is a spher- ical fusor consisting of linear ion acceleration channels that intersect in the sphere center, where the converging ions form a high-energy, high-density fusion core. The geometry is that of a truncated icosahedron, with each face corresponding to one end of an ion beam channel. Walls between the channels span radially from the outer fusion fuel ionization source to an inner radius delimiting the fusion core region. Voltage control is imposed along these walls to accelerate and focus the recirculat- ing ions. The net acceleration on each side of the channel is in the direction of the center, so that the ions recirculate along the channel paths. Permanent magnets with radial polarization inside the walls help to further constrain the ion beams while also magnetizing electrons for the purpose of neutralizing the fusion core re- gion. The natural modulation of the ion beams along with a proposed phase-locked active voltage control results in the coalescence of the ions into \bunches", and thus the device operates in a pulsed mode. The use of proton-boron-11 (p-11B) fuel is studied due to its terrestrial abundance and the high portion of its energy output that is in the form of charged particles.
    [Show full text]