Winter Wonderlands
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On
From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934. -
Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests
Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Current Management Direction ................................................................................................................. 1 Types of Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. -
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Museum Management Plan Cultural Resources Pacific West Region January 2008 National Park Service U. S. Department of the Interior S o k u To Bishop ee t Piute Pass Cr h F 11423ft p o o 3482m r h k s S i o B u B i th G s h L o A p Pavilion Dome Mount C F 11846ft I E Goethe C ork R r S 3611m D I V 13264ft e a I D e n 4024m k E J Lake oa q Sabrina u McClure Meadow k r i n 9600ft o F 2926m e l d R d Mount Henry Mount i i v 12196ft e Darwin M 3717m r The Hermit 13830ft South L 12360ft 4215m E 3767m Lake Big Pine C G 3985ft DINKEY O O 1215m O P D Hell for Sure Pass E w o N D Mount V s 11297ft A O e t T R McGee n L LAKES 3443m D U s E 12969ft T 3953m I O C C o A N r N Mount Powell WILDERNESS r D B a Y A JOHN l 13361ft I O S V I R N N 4072m Big Bishop Pass Pin k i e Cree v I D e 11972ft r E 3649m C Mount Goddard L r E MUIR e 13568ft Muir Pass e C DUSY North Palisade k 4136m 11955ft O BASIN 3644m N 14242ft Black Giant T E 4341m 13330ft COURTRIGHT JOHN MUIR P Le Conte A WILDERNESS 4063m RESERVOIR L I Canyon S B Charybdis A 395 8720ft ir D Middle Palisade c 13091ft E h 2658m Mount Reinstein 14040ft 3990m C r WILDERNESS CR Cre e 12604ft A ek v ES 4279m i Blackcap 3842m N T R Mountain Y O an INYO d s E 11559ft P N N a g c ir i 3523m C u Tr f n M ail ic i H John K A e isad Creek C N Pal r W T e E s H G D t o D I T d E T E d V r WISHON G a IL a O r O i d S l RESERVOIR R C Mather Pass Split Mountain G R W Finger Peak A Amphitheater 14058ft E 12100ft G S Lake 4285m 12404ft 3688m E 3781m D N U IV P S I C P D E r E -
Fiscal Year 2018
Smithsonian Fiscal Year 2018 Submitted to the Committees on Appropriations Congress of the United States Smithsonian Institution Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Justification to Congress May 2017 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Request to Congress TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Overview .................................................................................................... 1 FY 2018 Budget Request Summary ........................................................... 8 SALARIES AND EXPENSES Summary of FY 2018 Changes ................................................................ 13 Fixed Costs Salary and Related Costs ................................................................... 16 Utilities, Rent, Communications, and Other ........................................ 18 Summary of Program Changes ................................................................ 23 No-Year Funding ...................................................................................... 29 Object-Class Breakout ............................................................................. 29 Federal Resource Summary by Performance Objective and Program Category .............................................................................. 30 MUSEUMS AND RESEARCH CENTERS Grand Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research ............................. 32 Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe Introduction, Unlocking the Mysteries of the Universe ........................ 34 National Air and Space Museum ....................................................... -
Evaluation of Significance 1.4 Building History, Description and Significance
Building History, Description and Significance Evaluation of Significance 1.4 Statement of Significance cities across the nation and world-wide through the The AIB, built between 1879 and 1881 and originally participation of the SI and the National Museum in the known as the National Museum Building, was great international expositions of the 19th and early constructed to house the vast foreign and domestic 20th centuries. And, the National Museum contributed donations to the United States (U.S.) government immeasurably to the understanding of this country’s of exhibits from the 1876 International Exposition in cultural history — particularly that of Native American Philadelphia, which commemorated the Centennial of and Pacific Rim societies — through its preservation American Independence. It also was built to house the of the collections from U. S. government-sponsored growing Smithsonian Institution collections that could expeditions of exploration of the 19th century, as well not be accommodated in the Smithsonian Institution as the collections of various government departments. Building, now known as the Castle. It was the first of a group of purpose-built museums built by the SI The museum also has been a vital cultural force in with a combination of federal and private funding. The the nation’s capital through a series of both popular AIB possesses integrity of location, design, setting, and professional lectures and publications, instituted materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. at the very beginning of the SI’s occupation of The building was listed in the District of Columbia the building. In the 20th century, demonstrations, Inventory of Historic Sites in 1964 and, in 1971, it was classes, and publications extended the educational listed on the National Register of Historic Places and advantages provided through the Institution and the designated a National Historic Landmark. -
Sequoia National Forest
Sequoia National Forest List of Giant Sequoia Groves in California This list is intended to serve as a guide to where to find Giant Sequoias in California with the Sequoia NF Lake Isabella Visitor Center as the starting point. There are approximately 35,000-38,000 acres of giant sequoias in the Sierra Nevada; most of these are in Tulare County. Many groves are accessible via paved road, although most are subject to winter road closures. Contact the agency listed to learn of current conditions. Bold type means the grove is open year-round. Italicized type means groves are accessible via paved road. All mileages are approximate. ~Mileage from Grove County Forest Hike Roads Highway # Lake Isabella Visitor Center cross 235 miles via Hwy Agnew Fresno Sequoia NF 14S11 to 13S11 180 country 178 to Hwy 99 41.5 miles via Hwy Road 216 to Alder Creek Tulare Sequoia NF 190 155 to Kernville Rd. Sequoia Crest to Mtn 99 South on 133 miles via Hwy Mineral King Atwell Tulare Sequoia NP Atwell Mill 198 178 to Hwy 99 to Road Trail Hwy 65 Tenmile Creek 219 miles via Hwy Bearskin Fresno Sequoia NF Rd 13S09 to 180 178 to Hwy 99 13S02 210 miles via Hwy Big Stump Tulare Kings Canyon on highway 180 178 to Hwy 99 Coy Flat at Camp 62 miles via Hwy Black Tulare Sequoia NF Nelson to south 190 155 to Kernville Rd. Mountain 21S94 to Mtn 99 South Fork 133 miles via Hwy Trail then Board Camp Tulare Sequoia NP South Fork Road 198 178 to Hwy 99 to cross- Hwy 65 country 210 miles via Hwy Boulder Creek Fresno Sequoia NF 14S02 to 13S23 198 178 to Hwy 99 to Hwy 180 Griswold 125 miles via Hwy trail then Wishon Dr. -
Mineral King Goes Downhill
Commentary Mineral King Goes Downhill Thomas Lundmark* Anne Mester** R. A. Cordes*** Barry S. Sandals** * * Mineral King Valley is one step closer to development than it was when an article' on Mineral King appeared in Ecology Law Quarterly. Development as a ski resort was discussed as early as 1945,2 long before the Sierra Club filed suit in 1969 when the issuance of permits to develop Mineral King and to construct a highway through Sequoia National Park seemed imminent. That suit prompted compliance by the Forest Service with the environmental impact statement (EIS) process3 necessitated by the intervening passage of the National Envi- ronmental Policy Act (NEPA).' Publication by the Forest Service of a preliminary draft EIS in June 1974' was followed in December by publication of the draft EIS.6 A total of 2,150 comments was received in response to the draft EIS,7 many of them extremely detailed. Reactions to the draft EIS differed. Far West Ski Association and United States Ski Association wrote, "The * A.B., 1972, San Diego State University; J.D., 1976, University of California, Berkeley. ** A.B., 1965, Knox College; M.A., 1970 (Zoology), J.D., 1976, University of California, Berkeley. •** B.S., 1965, Washington University, St. Louis; M.S., 1967, Ph.D., 1972 (Chemi- cal Engineering), J.D., 1976, University of California, Berkeley. S*** B.A., 1971, University of Pennsylvania; Law School Class of 1977, University of California, Berkeley. 1. Comment, Mineral King. A Case Study of Forest Service Decision Making, 2 ECOLOGY L.Q. 493 (1972). 2. Id. at 499-500. -
Fiscal Year 2019
Smithsonian Fiscal Year 2019 Submitted to the Committees on Appropriations Congress of the United States Smithsonian Institution Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Justification to Congress February 2018 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Request to Congress TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Overview .................................................................................................... 1 FY 2019 Budget Request Summary ........................................................... 7 SALARIES AND EXPENSES Summary of FY 2019 Changes and Unit Detail ........................................ 11 Fixed Costs Salary and Related Costs ................................................................... 14 Utilities, Rent, Communications, and Other ........................................ 15 Summary of Program Changes ................................................................ 19 No-Year Funding ...................................................................................... 20 Object-Class Breakout ............................................................................. 20 Federal Resource Summary by Performance Objective and Program Category .............................................................................. 21 MUSEUMS AND RESEARCH CENTERS Grand Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research .............................. 23 National Air and Space Museum ........................................................ 25 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory ............................................ 31 Major Scientific -
Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1
Objects or Ecosystems? Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1 David J. Parsons2 Abstract: Policies and programs aimed at protecting giant sequoia the effects of such external threats as air pollution and (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in the national parks of the Sierra Nevada projected human induced climatic change. The challenges have evolved from the protection of individual trees to the preservation of entire ecosystems. We now recognize that the long-term preservation of giant associated with assuring the long-term preservation of giant sequoia depends on our ability to minimize and mitigate the influences of sequoia have become increasingly complicated as we have human activities. National Park Service management strategies for giant learned more about the complexity and inter-relatedness of sequoia focus on the restoration of native ecosystem processes. This includes the greater Sierra Nevada ecosystem. the use of prescribed fire to simulate natural ignitions as well as the movement of visitor facilities out of the groves. Basic research is being This paper briefly reviews the history of giant sequoia carried out to improve our understanding of the factors influencing giant management in the National Parks of the Sierra Nevada, sequoia reproduction, growth, and survival. Future management decisions emphasizing a gradually improved understanding of giant must recognize that giant sequoia are only part of a complex ecosystem; they sequoia ecosystems and how management has attempted to cannot be managed as objects in isolation of their surroundings. incorporate this understanding; outlines current management philosophy and strategies; and reviews issues and concerns for the future of giant sequoia management in national parks. -
COAST REDWOODS 111 Sutter Street 11Th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 362-2352 Savetheredwoods.Org
STATE OF Redwoods Conservation REPORT A TALE OF TWO FORESTS COAST REDWOODS 111 Sutter Street 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 362-2352 SaveTheRedwoods.org REPORT AUTHORS Emily E. Burns Richard Campbell Peter D. Cowan The authors are grateful for the contributions of William Croft, Shelana deSilva, Jerry Emory, Sam Hodder, Paul Ringgold, Stephen Sillett, and Traci Verardo-Torres, who greatly improved the report. Save the Redwoods League is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to protect and restore California redwoods and connect people to the peace and beauty of redwood forests. The League protects redwoods by purchasing redwood forests and the surrounding land needed to nurture them. We restore redwood forests by innovating science and technology that can improve stewardship and accelerate forest regeneration. By protecting more than 200,000 acres and helping to create 66 redwood parks and reserves, the League builds connections among people and the redwood forests. The League’s work is grounded in the principles of conservation biology, research, and improving our collective understanding and appreciation of the redwoods. COVER: LADY BIRD JOHNSON GROVE, REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK, PHOTOGRAPHY BY MAX FORSTER; COVER AT RIGHT: GIANT TREE TRAIL; SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST, PHOTOGRAPHY BY JONATHAN IRISH © 2018 STATE OF Redwoods Conservation REPORT A TALE OF TWO FORESTS GIANT SEQUOIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Coast redwoods and giant sequoia are iconic symbols of California and the conservation movement. These magnificent species have endured major ecological change from logging, development, and political threats over the past two centuries. Today, both coast redwoods and giant sequoia are facing some of their most significant, cumulative challenges yet. -
GIANT FOREST MUSEUM // Blue Route GIANT
Giant Forest MuseuM // Blue Route Giant Forest Museum: This is a historic market building inside the Sequoia National Park; 16 miles from the park entrance at Hwy 198. From the museum you can take a pleasant 1 mile self guided loop trail that will take you along gentle grades through excellent stands of giant sequoias. Trail-side exhibits tell of historic figures that helped make these parks what they are. Big Trees Trail: This popular 1 mile, self-guided loop trail is one of the most accessible trails in the park, and is wide enough for wheelchairs to navigate. This trail circles Round Meadow and features trail-side exhibits describing Sequoia ecology. Congress Trail: Accessed from the giant forest museum, this popular paved walking trail is 2.5 miles long (one way) and loops through the heart of the Giant Sequoia Grove; perfect for first-time visitors. Famous sequoias along this trail include the House and Senate Groups, the President, Chief Sequoyah, General Lee and McKinley Trees. Circle Meadow Trail: Beginning and ending on the heavily used Congress Trail, from the General Forest Museum, this 5.8 mile round- trip trail breaks away from the popular path for a venture further into the heart of the Giant Forest. Along with the popular Giant Forest landmarks of the General Sherman, and Chief Sequoyah trees, this loop visits such attractions as Black Arch, Pillars of Hercules, Cattle Cabin, Founders Group, and the Room Tree. Hazelwood Nature Trail: Accessed from the trail center at the lower end of the Giant Forest Museum Plaza, this pleasant Sequoia hiking experience will take you along gentle grades through excellent stands of giant sequoias. -
IMPLICATIONS for SKARN FORMATION in the MINERAL KING PENDANT MEGAN D’ERRICO, Trinity University Research Advisor: Dr
KECK GEOLOGY CONSORTIUM PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL KECK RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM IN GEOLOGY April 2011 Union College, Schenectady, NY Dr. Robert J. Varga, Editor Director, Keck Geology Consortium Pomona College Dr. Holli Frey Symposium Convenor Union College Carol Morgan Keck Geology Consortium Administrative Assistant Diane Kadyk Symposium Proceedings Layout & Design Department of Earth & Environment Franklin & Marshall College Keck Geology Consortium Geology Department, Pomona College 185 E. 6th St., Claremont, CA 91711 (909) 607-0651, [email protected], keckgeology.org ISSN# 1528-7491 The Consortium Colleges The National Science Foundation ExxonMobil Corporation KECK GEOLOGY CONSORTIUM PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH ANNUAL KECK RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM IN GEOLOGY ISSN# 1528-7491 April 2011 Robert J. Varga Keck Geology Consortium Diane Kadyk Editor and Keck Director Pomona College Proceedings Layout & Design Pomona College 185 E 6th St., Claremont, CA Franklin & Marshall College 91711 Keck Geology Consortium Member Institutions: Amherst College, Beloit College, Carleton College, Colgate University, The College of Wooster, The Colorado College, Franklin & Marshall College, Macalester College, Mt Holyoke College, Oberlin College, Pomona College, Smith College, Trinity University, Union College, Washington & Lee University, Wesleyan University, Whitman College, Williams College 2010-2011 PROJECTS FORMATION OF BASEMENT-INVOLVED FORELAND ARCHES: INTEGRATED STRUCTURAL AND SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE BIGHORN MOUNTAINS, WYOMING Faculty: CHRISTINE SIDDOWAY, MEGAN ANDERSON, Colorado College, ERIC ERSLEV, University of Wyoming Students: MOLLY CHAMBERLIN, Texas A&M University, ELIZABETH DALLEY, Oberlin College, JOHN SPENCE HORNBUCKLE III, Washington and Lee University, BRYAN MCATEE, Lafayette College, DAVID OAKLEY, Williams College, DREW C. THAYER, Colorado College, CHAD TREXLER, Whitman College, TRIANA N. UFRET, University of Puerto Rico, BRENNAN YOUNG, Utah State University.