DOCSLIB.ORG

Turtle Mountain Booklet 141990 1.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turtle Mountain Booklet 141990 1.Indd TTakakinging CarCaree ofof OurOur WWaatertershedshed A Watershed Plan for the East Souris River Watershed, Manitoba, Canada January, 2006 Souris Hartney 23 Chain Lakes Sub-Watershed Whitewater Lake 21 Sub-Watershed 3 Medora Creek Whitewater Sub-Watershed Lake Boissevain Deloraine 3 21 Waskada Souris River Turtle Mountain Waskada Creek Provincial Park Sub-Watershed Canada U.S.A. East Souris River Watershed Management Plan - January 2006 1 Deloraine, Manitoba January, 2006 Our Vision Our watershed community, lead by the Turtle Mountain Conservation District and the Watershed Planning Advisory Team, has prepared the East A healthy, sustainable, diverse Souris River Watershed Management Plan. landscape capable of providing The Actions in the plan must be implemented economic, social and environmental and monitored if we want to see improvements to our watershed. We have approval from member benefits for current and future municipalities to proceed with the implementation generations. of the plan. Successful implementation will require long- term dedication and commitment of money and staff from many organizations. On behalf of the Turtle Mountain Conservation District and the Watershed Planning Advisory Team, we are prepared to implement the plan to the best of our ability and spirit. Richard Sexton TMCD Chair Minister of Water Stewardship Room 314 - 450 Broadway Avenue Legislative Building Winnipeg, MB R3C 0V8 Mr. Richard Sexton, Chairperson Turtle Mountain Conservation District Box 508, Deloraine, MB R0M 0M0 Dear Mr. Sexton: I would like to congratulate the staff and board of the Turtle Mountain Conservation District for developing the East Souris River Watershed Management Plan. I applaud the leadership of the Turtle Mountain Conservation District in recognizing that integrated watershed planning is critical to the protection, conservation and management of Manitoba’s water resources and aquatic ecosystems. The East Souris River Watershed Management Plan is an important step in addressing local risks to water resources and aquatic ecosystems in your watershed and will assist in evaluating priority of the actions needed to protect land and water. This plan is a positive step in realizing the vision you have articulated for your watershed. This management plan will forge a strong and continued partnership with the Province of Manitoba. I am pleased to provide the services of Manitoba Water Stewardship to help support the implementation of your plan, with respect to the inclusion of source water protection and surface water management strategies. Once again, congratulations on the plan and best wishes to the board and staff as you move towards implementation of the East Souris River Watershed Management Plan. Sincerely, Steve Ashton Minister “Vision without action is merely a dream. Action without vision just passes the time. Vision with action can change the world.” - Joel Barker Introduction Purpose of the plan What is a Watershed? Why is a Watershed Plan A watershed is a defined land area that important? captures rainfall and other precipitation and There are pressures on the watershed due funnels it to a river, lake or stream. to a growing economy. The plan ensures the resources in the watershed are managed in The plan is a roadmap for the A watershed just makes sense as a way to a sustainable fashion. community to help plan and define the place where we live. It is the practice good, common sense people, government, businesses, The plan is a roadmap for the community to programs. institutions, animals, plants and more. This help plan and practice good common sense rich, diverse community lives in the programs. The plan helps define what is watershed. The community influences the important to the community. watershed and the watershed influences the community…what a coincidence!! The plan sets local priorities between need to-do’s and nice to-do’s. The plan helps Since any watershed is a complex system, communicate to the public where the work everyone with a stake in the watershed has will be done. to make trade-offs, compromises, and maybe some sacrifices to keep it The plan demonstrates to senior healthy…it’s only common sense. governments that local people are in charge of managing their own resources. What is a Watershed Plan? A watershed plan is a document prepared The plan sets a way to measure future by the watershed community that describes progress on meeting resource goals and needed actions in the watershed over time objectives. The plan helps groups like the to achieve a sustainable healthy watershed. Turtle Mountain Conservation District 25 Years From (TMCD) acquire external money for The East Souris River Watershed community projects. Now - 2031 Management Plan is simply an organized What would we see if we flew way of spending money and living in the Watershed Plan Helps Land over our watershed 25 years watershed. It is your way of stepping back Use Planning from now and looked out the from the table and looking at the bigger Information included in the watershed plan window? picture while setting short and long term will be used by area planning districts in their development plans to avoid potential con- Would we see a watershed that priorities. supports a strong agricultural flicts with existing or future development in community with healthy The plan is a common sense way to balance the watershed. An example would be valu- ecological functions? both the pressing issues of today with special able information about riparian protection or care for future generations too. drinking water source protection included in Would we see a watershed that the watershed plan used by the planning dis- can buffer harmful water level tricts when land use policy statements are fluctuations? being prepared. Would we see a watershed Planning districts have had input into the with manageable sediment and preparation of this watershed plan and will nutrient movement? continue to be asked for input into future revisions or proposed updates. Tying good What do you want your land use planning decisions into improving watershed to look like? the health of the watershed is only common sense and everyone wins. 4 East Souris River Watershed Management Plan - January 2006 East Souris River - Integrated Watershed Management Plan Study Area N Souris R.M. of Chain Lakes Glenwood Sub-Watershed Hartney Medora Creek R.M. of Lauder Sub-Watershed Cameron Whitewater Lake Sub-Watershed Napinka Medora Boissevain Deloraine R.M. of R.M. of Brenda Canada Arthur U.S.A. R.M. of Goodlands Morton Waskada Souris River Turtle Mountain R.M. of Watershed Provincial Park Winchester Waskada Creek Sub-Watershed Our Principles Behind the Plan COOPERATION Everyone in the watershed will cooperate and work together. RESPECT Neighbourly respect is a must. There is always someone downstream. SHARING The Turtle Mountain Conservation District and their member municipalities can’t succeed without a fair and reasonable provincial and federal government commitment to help our watershed. VALUE FOR MONEY Our collective investments in this watershed will demonstrate good value. PARTNERSHIPS A team approach in working with other collective agencies and citizens will be encouraged. No one group can do it all. LEADERSHIP This community will be a leader in watershed management. PRO CHANGE This community is not afraid of trying new things. ACTIVISM Everyone with a stake in this watershed will be encouraged to participate in making the watershed a healthy place to live. East Souris River Watershed Management Plan - January 2006 5 Process and Players The Turtle Mountain Conservation District The Birth of WPAT has been a conservation leader in the The invitation soon went out in 2002 for community for over 30 years. Representing representatives from the watershed its member municipalities and ratepayers, community to participate on a Watershed the TMCD Board, in partnership with the Planning Advisory Team (WPAT). The provincial government, has delivered many agencies, organizations and interest groups excellent programs and projects to area that received the invitation are listed in residents. The Board has had lots of help Appendix A and Appendix B. along the way with its programs, but is always striving for improvement. TMCD members Professionals from key government and private agencies came together as WPAT R.M. of Arthur In 2002, well before the provincial R.M. of Brenda with TMCD, municipal and other agencies government launched a new water R.M. of Cameron and ratepayers to: R.M. of Morton management strategy and legislation, the 1. oversee the planning process, R.M. of Turtle Mountain TMCD Board decided it was time to step 2. get community input to the plan, R.M. of Winchester back and set revised watershed goals, 3. keep the community updated, and Town of Boissevain objectives and new actions in an integrated 4. troubleshoot along the way. Town of Deloraine watershed plan. The Board agreed that their Town of Killarney role was to facilitate the preparation of the WPAT met 12 times during the process and Village of Waskada plan in partnership with others in the was key to keeping the process going without watershed. sacrificing quality. The watershed plan would only be a success Step 1 if it was prepared with input from everyone Got Organized in the watershed, not just the Board and its Fall 2002 sub-district committees. The Board sees the plan as a valuable tool for many Step 2 organizations in their watershed to use in Talked to RMs making decisions. 2003 Step 3 WPAT meeting Formed WPAT Photo credit: Dave Dobson 2003 The Planning Step 4 Step 7 Resource Summary Process Public Open Prepared Step 6 Houses Draft Plan 2005 Step 5 2005 Public Open Houses Step 8 2004 Final Plan The goal is to ensure (Issues and Actions) January 2006 the plan be truly prepared by and for the residents of the Step 9 East Souris River Watershed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Election Municipality of Grassland Special Issue
    2018 Election Municipality of Grassland Special Issue For the office of Reeve Nick Nowazek I was born and raised in Brandon, Manitoba. My wife and I, Victoria, moved to the Minto area in 2008. We are now a family with three children. I’ve been a truck driver for over 20 years now. I have always been interested in politics. I was elected as a Councillor for the newly amalgamated Municipality of Grassland in 2014. I really enjoy getting out, meeting and working with the people in the area. In the election, I am running for Reeve. If I’m elected, I will look into more cost effective ways to do municipal works and road maintenance. I believe feasibility, accountability and responsibility should be worked into all municipal decisions. Blair Woods I have lived in this area since 1960. I attended school in Elgin and Hartney and became a farmer following a multi generation farming family. I have been involved with other organizations at local, provincial and national levels such as Snoman, Sunflower Association, 4-H and Lions Club. Council History - Councillor for Whitewater Municipality from 1986 - 2002 - Reeve for Whitewater Municipality from 2006 - 2014 - Reeve for Municipality from 2014 - 2018 I have been involved with the amalgamation of three councils into the Municipality of Grassland. I take pride in being part of this team and accomplishing positive changes for this area. I have maintained a good working relationship with residents, staff and council. I will continue the “open-door” policy in the future with all areas of concern for Grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Games and Results
    THE O'GRADY CHALLENGE Page # 1 Game Numbers and Results of Matches The O’Grady Trophy was put into play at the annual MCA Bonspiel of 1908 – any affiliated club could enter a double team into a round robin competition, and the Granite were declared the winners with the highest accumulated points over teams from Glenboro, Birtle, Napinka, Dauphin and Regina SK. Kenora ON was the first team to challenge. First 100 years includes matches #1 thru #1,375 on pages 1-27… Matches from 2008 onwards commence on page 27 Match Date Holder Score Challenger Score Winner 1 03/02/1908 Granite 24 Kenora 18 Granite 2 03/09/1908 Granite 23 Thistle 20 Granite 3 03/16/1908 Granite 28 Assiniboine 20 Granite 4 03/23/1908 Granite 37 Selkirk 19 Granite 5 03/30/1908 Granite 22 Civic 27 Civic 6 12/28/1908 Civic 27 Thistle 28 Thistle No # ~01/10/1909 Regina defaulted toThistle no game # used 7 01/18/1909 Thistle 28 Granite 15 Thistle 8 01/28/1909 Thistle 28 Civic 21 Thistle 9 02/04/1909 Thistle 35 Strathcona 19 Thistle 10 02/06/1909 Thistle 27 Ft. William 20 Thistle 11 02/24/1909 Thistle 25 Granite 28 Granite 12 03/05/1909 Granite 29 Selkirk 20 Granite 13 03/17/1909 Granite 21 Assiniboine 30 Assiniboine 14 03/19/1909 Assiniboine 32 Strathcona 19 Assiniboine 15 03/22/1909 Assiniboine 27 Russell 18 Assiniboine 16 12/26/1909 Assiniboine 27 Civic 21 Assiniboine 17 12/28/1909 Assiniboine 28 Selkirk 21 Assiniboine 18 01/10/1910 Assiniboine 21 Napinka 31 Napinka 19 02/03/1910 Napinka 25 Hartney 28 Hartney 20 03/09/1910 Hartney 27 Deloraine 18 Hartney 21 12/05/1910 Hartney no scores or detailedSouris reports furnished Souris 22 12/16/1910 Souris 31 Napinka 18 Souris 23 12/21/1910 Souris 41 Boissevain 20 Souris 24 12/26/1910 Souris no scores or detailedElgin reports furnished Elgin 25 01/05/1911 Elgin 23 Melita 28 Melita 26 01/13/1911 Melita 24 Deloraine 29 Deloraine 27 01/18/1911 Deloraine 20 Glenboro 22 Glenboro 28 01/23/1911 Glenboro 32 Assiniboine 24 Glenboro 29 02/02/1911 Glenboro 27 Thistle 20 Glenboro 30 02/20/1911 Glenboro 20 Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Souris R1ve.R Investigation
    INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION REPORT ON THE SOURIS R1VE.R INVESTIGATION OTTAWA - WASHINGTON 1940 OTTAWA EDMOND CLOUTIER PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1941 INTERNATIONAT, JOINT COMMISSION OTTAWA - WASHINGTON CAKADA UNITEDSTATES Cllarles Stewrt, Chnirmun A. 0. Stanley, Chairman (korge 11'. Kytc Roger B. McWhorter .J. E. I'erradt R. Walton Moore Lawrence ,J. Burpee, Secretary Jesse B. Ellis, Secretary REFERENCE Under date of January 15, 1940, the following Reference was communicated by the Governments of the United States and Canada to the Commission: '' I have the honour to inform you that the Governments of Canada and the United States have agreed to refer to the International Joint Commission, underthe provisions of Article 9 of theBoundary Waters Treaty, 1909, for investigation, report, and recommendation, the following questions with respect to the waters of the Souris (Mouse) River and its tributaries whichcross the InternationalBoundary from the Province of Saskatchewanto the State of NorthDakota and from the Stat'e of NorthDakota to the Province of Manitoba:- " Question 1 In order to secure the interests of the inhabitants of Canada and the United States in the Souris (Mouse) River drainage basin, what apportion- ment shouldbe made of the waters of the Souris(Mouse) River and ita tributaries,the waters of whichcross theinternational boundary, to the Province of Saskatchewan,the State of North Dakota, and the Province of Manitoba? " Question ,$! What methods of control and operation would be feasible and desirable in
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN Southwestern Manitoba Mixed
    Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IBA Page 1 of 1 COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN for the Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IMPORTANT BIRD AREA A Grassland Bird Initiative for Southwestern Manitoba's - • Poverty Plains • Lyleton-Pierson Prairies • Souris River Lowlands Prepared by: Cory Lindgren, Ken De Smet Manitoba IBA Program Species At Risk Biologist Oak Hammock Marsh Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Conservation Box 1160, Stonewall, Manitoba R0E 2Z0 200 Saulteaux Crescent, Winnipeg R3J 3W3 Manitoba IBA Program 10/03/01 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IBA Page 2 of 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 The Poverty Plains.......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Souris River Lowlands ................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Lyleton-Pierson Prairies ................................................................................................................ 9 2.0 THE IBA PROGRAM........................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 IBA Manitoba ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Souris River Board
    International Souris River Board Presentation to the Water Topics Overview Committee August 14, 2018 Minot, ND Outline 1. Basin Characteristic 2. International Souris River Board 3. International Souris River Study Board International Souris River Board 2 Souris River Basin International Souris River Board 3 International Souris River Board Administration Board Structure 9 Members for Canada - agency and public 9 Members for the United States - agency and public Hydrology Committee Flow Forecasting Liaison Committee Aquatic Ecosystem Health Committee Observer status for Interested Parties International Souris River Board 4 Membership Canada United States Manitoba Sustainable Development - North Dakota State Water Commission Quantity North Dakota Department of Health Manitoba Sustainable Development - North Dakota Game and Fish Quality Department Saskatchewan Water Security Agency - United States Army Corps of Engineers Quality United States Geological Survey Saskatchewan Water Security Agency - United States Fish and Wildlife Service Quantity Basin Representation Environment Canada – Quality and Quantity Ward County Commissioner Retired Federal Civil Servant Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Representative Basin Representation Upper Souris Watershed Association Assiniboine River Basin Initiative Reeve, Manitoba Canadian and United States Co-Secretaries International Souris River Board 5 International Souris River Board January 2007 Directive: 1. Oversee the implementation of compliance with the 2000 Interim Measures as Modified 1. Saskatchewan has the right to divert, store, and use waters that originate in Saskatchewan provided the annual flow of the Souris River at the Sherwood Crossing is not diminished by more than 50 percent. 2. North Dakota will deliver 20 cfs to Manitoba from June to October 2. Assist the Commission with the Joint Water Quality Monitoring Program 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Keymap
    Nabel Nueltin Lake Lake COLVIN LAKE NUELTIN LAKE CARIBOU RIVER PROVINCIAL PARK Nejanilini Shannon PARK RESERVE HUDSON Lake PROVINCIAL PARK Lake Cochrane R North Seal River Seal Churchill Nicklin River L Shethanei BAY Lake Lac Brochet Tadoule Lake Whiskey Jack Lake River North WAPUSK Knife Seal Lake Churchill River NATIONAL NUMAYKOOS SAND LAKESSouth PROVINCIAL P ARK PROVINCIAL PARK PARK Big Reindeer Sand Lake Lake Northern Southern Indian Lake Thorsteinson Churchill Lake Fidler River Indian Lake Port Nelson Vandekerckhove Goldsand Gauer Barrington Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Opachuanau Lake AMISK PARK RESERVE Waskaiowaka River River River Baldock Lake Stephens Lake Lake Rat Gods Leaf Rapids Granville Nelson Russell Lake Split Lake River Rat Mynarski Lake Lakes Lake Hayes Highrock Lake Churchill THOMPSON PAINT LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK EAST PAINT LAKE PARK RESERVE River Sipiwesk Knee Lake River Lake Oxford River Edmund Snow Lake Lake Lake Cross Gods Wekusko Grass FLIN FLON Lake Walker Grass Sucker Lake Lake GRASS RIVER PROVINCIAL PARK Lake Sharpe Lake Red Red Sucker Lake Molson Lake R North Moose CLEARWATER Lake LAKE Nelson PROVINCIAL PARK Island Playgreen L Lake THE PAS LITTLE LIMESTONE LAKE PROVINCIAL PARK Cedar WALTER COOK UPLANDS CAVES ECOLOGICAL LAKE RESERVE TOWN OF Lake GRAND RAPIDS WINNIPEG L A C L W A K I E N W N I I GRAND ISLAND N P RED DEER N PARK RESERVE E I SOUTHERN MANITOBA MUNICIPAL P G GOOSE ISLANDS PEMICAN ISLAND E O PARK RESERVE PARK RESERVE G S O I MOUNTAIN S S (NORTH) I S Swan KEY MAP BIRCH ISLAND R Lake CHITEK LAKE PARK RESERVE PROVINCIAL PARK SWAN Berens LAKE Bowsman MINITONAS- River DUCK Fishing SWAN BOWSMAN BAY VALLEY Swan River L Minitonas WESTSwan KINWOW BAY PARK RESERVE LAKE Benito WATERHEN ST MARTIN MOUNTAIN STURGEON BAY (SOUTH) HOMEBROOK- PARK RESERVE ATIKAKI PEONAN POINT GRAHAMDALE FISHER BAY DUCK MOUNTAIN Lake PARK PROVINCIAL PARK Winnipegosis PROVINCIAL RESERVE LAKE ETHELBERT St.
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan Flood and Natural Hazard Risk Assessment
    2018 Stakeholder Insights Saskatchewan Flood and Natural Hazard Risk Assessment Prepared for Saskatchewan Ministry of Government Relations By V. Wittrock1, R.A. Halliday2, D.R. Corkal3, M. Johnston1, E. Wheaton4, J. Lettvenuk1, I. Stewart3, B. Bonsal5 and M. Geremia3 SRC Publication No. 14113-2E18 May 2018 Revised Dec 2018 EWheaton Consulting Cover Photos: Flooded road – Government of Saskatchewan Forest fire – Government of Saskatchewan Winter drought – V.Wittrock January 2009 Snow banks along roadway – J.Wheaton March 2013 Oil well surrounded by water – I. Radchenko May 2015 Participants at Stakeholder Meetings – D.Corkal June 2017 Kneeling farmer on cracked soil – istock photo Tornado by Last Mountain Lake – D.Sherratt Summer 2016 This report was prepared by the Saskatchewan Research Council (SRC) for the sole benefit and internal use of Ministry of Government Relations. Neither SRC, nor any of its employees, agents or representatives, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, reliability, suitability or usefulness of any information disclosed herein, or represents that the report’s use will not infringe privately owned rights. SRC accepts no liability to any party for any loss or damage arising as a result of the use of or reliance upon this report, including, without limitation, punitive damages, lost profits or other indirect or consequential damages. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by SRC Saskatchewan Flood and Natural Hazard Risk Assessment Prepared for Saskatchewan Ministry of Government Relations By V.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the Period 2002 to 2012
    Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area Definitions for the period 2002 to 2012 The following list identifies the RHAs and RHA Districts in Manitoba between the period 2002 and 2012. The 11 RHAs are listed using major headings with numbers and include the MCHP - Manitoba Health codes that identify them. RHA Districts are listed under the RHA heading and include the Municipal codes that identify them. Changes / modifications to these definitions and the use of postal codes in definitions are noted where relevant. 1. CENTRAL (A - 40) Note: In the fall of 2002, Central changed their districts, going from 8 to 9 districts. The changes are noted below, beside the appropriate district area. Seven Regions (A1S) (* 2002 changed code from A8 to A1S *) '063' - Lakeview RM '166' - Westbourne RM '167' - Gladstone Town '206' - Alonsa RM 'A18' - Sandy Bay FN Cartier/SFX (A1C) (* 2002 changed name from MacDonald/Cartier, and code from A4 to A1C *) '021' - Cartier RM '321' - Headingley RM '127' - St. Francois Xavier RM Portage (A1P) (* 2002 changed code from A7 to A1P *) '090' - Macgregor Village '089' - North Norfolk RM (* 2002 added area from Seven Regions district *) '098' - Portage La Prairie RM '099' - Portage La Prairie City 'A33' - Dakota Tipi FN 'A05' - Dakota Plains FN 'A04' - Long Plain FN Carman (A2C) (* 2002 changed code from A2 to A2C *) '034' - Carman Town '033' - Dufferin RM '053' - Grey RM '112' - Roland RM '195' - St. Claude Village '158' - Thompson RM 1 Manitoba Regional Health Authority (RHA) DISTRICTS MCHP Area
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner & Cattle Producer Values Towards Grasslands and Avian
    Landowner & Cattle Producer Values Towards Grasslands and Avian Species at Risk in Southwestern Manitoba Author: Lynnea Parker, RMOT., BNRP., MNRM. Manitoba Important Bird Areas Program 63 Albert St #401, Winnipeg, MB R3B 1G4 Contact Information Phone: 204-558-0559 Email: [email protected] April 7, 2020 Photo Credits: Main Cover Photo: Cow and calf pairs in a pasture near Melita, Manitoba By Lynnea Parker Bird Photos on Cover: Top Row: Chestnut-collared Longspur, Grasshopper Sparrow, Baird’s Sparrow Bottom Row: Loggerhead Shrike, Sprague’s Pipit, Ferruginous Hawk By Dr. Christian Artuso 2 Acknowledgements Funding for this research project was provided by Birds Canada and the Manitoba Important Bird Areas Program through the Manitoba Conservation Trust and a Young Professional Stewardship Grant awarded at the 12th Prairie Conservation and Endangered Species Conference. This project would not have been as successful without the assistance of several key individuals and organizations that lent their support during project development and delivery. I would like to personally thank Carol Graham from Manitoba Habitat and Heritage Corporation, Dr. Christian Artuso and Silke Nebel from Birds Canada, Timothy Poole and Heather Miltenburg from Agriculture and Resource Development, and Amanda Shave from the Manitoba Important Bird Areas Program. I would also like to extend my thanks to Dean Brooker and Yasemin Keeler from the Souris River Watershed District, Monarch Homestead in Melita, and many others for their help with recruiting landowner and cattle producer participation. Last but not least, thank you to all the landowners and cattle producers who participated in the online survey and met with me to share their personal views towards land conservation and species at risk in southwestern Manitoba.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Largest CO2 Storage Research Project with EOR
    The World's Largest CO2 Storage Research Project with EOR IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO Monitoring & Storage Introduction: IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale About the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 2 The Facts about the IEA GHG Weyburn- Project: Final Phase CO2 Monitoring & Storage Project Monitoring & Storage Project Midale CO2 Monitoring & Storage Project Building on the positive results received from the first phase, the objective of the Final The Project is Recognized and Endorsed By: • An 8-year, $80 million project on carbon storage funded by partners around Phase is to encourage the widespread use of technologies required to design, implement, IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring & Storage monitor and verify a significant number of CO geological storage projects throughout the the world 2 • The International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (ensuring world. Through both a technical component, led by the PTRC, and a public policy and • Investigates potential for storage of man-made CO2 in the enhanced oil recovery Project: First Phase technical excellence) community outreach component, managed by the Leading Sponsors, including Natural (EOR) process, from technical and regulatory perspectives • The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (ensuring sound policy and Resources Canada and the US Department of Energy-NETL, the second phase will • The world's largest, full-scale, in-field Measurement Monitoring and The first phase began in 2000 and ended in 2004. The purpose of the first phase was to regulation development) Verification study with EOR predict and verify the ability of an oil reservoir to securely and economically store and further carbon storage in Canada by: • First phase led by the Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC), which contain CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Jay, Vol.33, Issue 4
    RANGE EXTENSION OF PURPLE CONE-FLOWER IN SOUTHEASTERN SASKATCHEWAN by B. DE VRIES* The main references to the Research Station, Agriculture Canada, distribution of the Purple Cone-flower Swift Current (SCS); Fraser Her¬ (.Echinacea angustifolia D.C.) in Saskat¬ barium, University of Saskatchewan, chewan are given in Breitung’s An¬ Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (SASK); notated Catalogue of the Vascular Flora Herbarium, University of Alberta, Ed¬ of Saskatchewan, Budd and Best’s Wild monton, Alberta (ALTA); Herbarium, Plants of the Canadian Prairies, and University of Calgary, Calgary, Boivin’s Flora of the Prairie Provinces, Alberta (UAC); Herbarium, Univer¬ Part III.2 3 1 These sources list the sity of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan Purple Cone-flower as an occasional (USAS); United States National to common indigenous entity of the Museum, Washington, D.C. (US); Her¬ prairie flora on dry river-banks and barium, University of Manitoba, Win¬ benchlands in southeastern Saskat¬ nipeg, Manitoba (WIN). chewan. The author is grateful to Mrs. G. M. In an endeavor to locate all known Keleher, Department of Botany, collecting stations of this plant species University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, for prior to and after 1957 north of the the loan of voucher material, and to all 49th parallel, the following in¬ other institutions for their helpful in¬ stitutions have been of assistance: formation on Echinacea angustifolia Biosy'stematic Research Institute, collections. The fieldwork was suppor¬ Agriculture Canada, Ottawa (DAO); ted by private funds. National Herbarium of Canada, National Museum of Canada, Ottawa The following is an enumeration of (CAN); Fort Qu’Appelle Herbarium, collecting data: Fort Qu’Appelle, Saskatchewan ONTARIO: / White 59062 (CAN 106685), (FQH); Gray Herbarium, Harvard Brampton, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Winners
    2020 U MANITOBA! NK YO THA PRESENTED BY FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF THE $664,590 2008558 Miller, Mark - Winnipeg 2282667 Shindela, Leslie - Brandon $6,500 CWT Vacations Travel Voucher or a Winnipeg SUMMER BONUS 20 WINNERS Jets Suite to a 2020-2021 Home game for 12 people 2020 Honda HR-V (valued at $29,104) or a 2020 Toyota C-HR LE OF $1,000 CASH (valued at $6,000) plus $500 Cash or $5,000 Cash (valued at $25,982.20) or $25,000 Cash 2057738 Anaka, Jason - Winnipeg 2038608 Wright, Barb - Winnipeg 2055602 Marleau, Darrell - Winnipeg 2058509 Bergen, Joseph - Winnipeg 2020 Yamaha EXR Waverunner with PWC Karavan 2027226 Cheater, Ardis - Winnipeg Trailer (valued at $16,799) or a $15,000 CWT DREAM BONUS 2028387 Dujlovic, Toni - Winnipeg Vacations Travel Voucher or $12,000 Cash 2046505 Ferguson, Oswald - Winnipeg 2001125 Harrison, Jamie - Winnipeg Mercedes-Benx 2020 GLC300 4MATIC SUV (valued at 2038080 Fresnoza, Agnes - Winnipeg $64,233.75) or a 2020 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 Access Cab 6A (valued 2021611 Gilson, Susan - Deloraine 2020 Harley-Davidson FLHXS Street Glide (valued at at $42,306.18) plus a 2020 Jayco Jayflight 195RB Travel Trailer 2011579 Godbout, Kirsten - Winnipeg $33,799) or a $28,000 CWT Vacations Travel Voucher (valued at $25,122) or $55,000 Cash 2055629 Gottfried, Michael - Ile Des Chenes plus $2,000 Cash or $25,000 Cash 2025321 Friesen, Edith - Altona 2050837 Hargest, John - Winnipeg 2051673 Birur, Anand - Winnipeg 2002916 King, Elizabeth - Whitemouth 2020 Honda Passport Sport (valued at $44,974) EARLY BIRD 2019742 Maddocks, Rose - Winnipeg
    [Show full text]