Is the Energy Crisis Real?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Is the Energy Crisis Real? Is the Energy Crisis Real'l _The United States faces a serious For an upcoming report evaluat­ and continuing energy problem ing the Department of Energy's which has provoked intense debate. existing and planned residential Few will deny that the age of cheap; energy conservation outreach. pro­ "easy" oil has drawn to a close. Im­ grams, 2 GAO sought to determine ports from the Middle East are vul­ public opinion on the overall energy nerable, and domestic production situation since 1977, and review the is steadily declining. research on what motivates people At the present, there is no con­ to conserve. Specific issues were sensus on which fuel can and • public awareness or perception Lisa Shames should replace oil. The use of nu­ of the energy situation, Ms Shames Is a management analyst in the clear power is steeped in contro­ • factors which persuade or moti­ Energy and Minerals D1v1slon She received versy. The proven reserves of gas vate the public to conserve, and her AB degree in pol1tIcal science from have been falling off. Coal is abun­ Columbia University in 1977 and her dant, but there are potential envi­ • conservation measures already master's degree in pubhc admInistrat1on ronmental risks and practical prob­ taken. from Syracuse University In 1978 She lems in mining and transporting the We believed that these considera­ 10Ined GAO that year on the graduate co-op necessary quantities. Among un­ tions contribute to the individual's program conventional sources, solar energy decision to adopt or reject conser­ is impeded by economic and insti­ vation as a permanent way of life. tutional barriers, and synthetic It should be noted at the outset fuels will not be available in signifi­ that there are various Influences cant quantities until the end of the affecting an individual's decision to decade. choose conservation. Some are Most likely the projected energy general (prevailing local fuel prices), policy will develop into a mixed while others are more personal (the strategy to meet our future energy effect of higher fuel costs on one's needs. One component of that mix, heating bills). Social values also and one that offers immediate affect a person's decision. Conser­ opportunities, is conservation. vation Is an "apple pie" concept; that is, few people rejec}: It as socially unacceptable. Yet, despite Conservation the verbal enthusiasm for conserva­ tion, there is a wide variation be­ Conservation, or the reduction of tween what people say and what energy use and Its improved effici­ they actually do to save energy. It is ency, is receiving growing recogni­ difficult to determine the relative tion as an energy alternative. The weights of these variables in any second National Energy Pian, is­ given survey, but they must be rec­ sued in May 1979, stated that "con­ ognized nevertheless: servation continues to offer the greatest prospect of reducing de­ Publie Pereeption ol pendence on unstable imports, reducing energy costs, and meeting the Energy Situation environmental goals." The Harvard Business School estimates that a Effective policy implementation serious commitment to conserva­ requires public acceptance, and the tion could "supply" up to 40 percent level of that acceptance Is, in part, of the country's energy with the related to the public's belief that the same standard of llving. 1 problem is serious, that the prob­ Residential conservation involves lem will affect them personally, and millions of Individual decisionmak­ that a new policy Is necessary to ers representing the most decen­ solve the problem. For this reason, tralized energy-consuming sector. ··it Is important to examine how the Their attitudes and behavior regard­ public perceives the energy situa­ ing conservation are critical to any tion. successful effort in encouraging Prior to the Arab oil embargo, the public to adopt a more energy­ energy was virtually absent from efficient lifestyle. the public concern, but it is now a GAO Review/Winter 1981 33 Is the Energy Crisis Real? national problem. According to the Gallup poll, since 1977, over four­ fifths of the American public think that the current national energy problem is "very" or "fairly" serious rather than "not at all" serious. Fur­ thermore, the public Is not very optimistic about the outlook for the U.S. energy situation. In Aprll 1979, tliree out of four persons polled by the Opinion Research Corporation said the energy situation would re­ main serious over the next year. However, when ranked with other problems as the most important problem facing the country, energy received low-level, but consistent, concern. It has generally been over­ shadowed by the economy, especl­ al ly Inflation and unemployment. But significant peaks of interest In energy have occurred when there are dramatic reminders. Most re­ cently, during the 1979 gasoline shortage, more people named ener­ gy (38%) than inflation (28%) as the nation's most Important prob­ lem. 3 But as the lines at the gas stations shortened, so did the public interest in energy. Apparent­ ly, ;'the public does not recognize therelatlonshlp between the energy situation and the economy.- The Shortage Reality Despite gas shortages and other dramatic reminders,.Americans still doubt there is a "real" oll shortage stemming froo, a genuine depletion of resources.__:.. According to the Gallup Poll, as of mid-1979, four In ten people believed that the U.S. produces enough oil to meet Its energy needs. The proportion that believes we are oll self-sufficient Is higher now that in either 1977 or 1978. On the other hand, 46 percent are aware that the country must import some oll, although the majority does not know what per­ centage of oil comes from abroad. Several surveys show that since 1977, one out of two people feel that the fuel shortage is a hoax. 4 This skepticism intensified during the summer of 1979, when most ·-people believed the gasoline short­ age was deliberately brought about by the oil companies to increase prices. These opinions underscore the public's lack of understanding and knowledge of the energy situation. 34 GAO Review/Winter 1981 Is the Energy Crisis Real? The predominant view-that the America's faith that technological with personal, dally concerns. A gasoline and oil shortages have discoveries, or simply "yankee in­ consumer may be unfamiliar with been contrived-is primarily a re­ genuity" will solve the energy Btu's or kilowatt hours, but virtually sult of mixed messages from Gov­ problem:'rhls belief In a technolog­ everyone relates to those same ernment and industry about short­ ical solution removes the perceived savings in dollars and cents. ages and then gluts. Conservation need to act individually. The pub­ Finally, easily understood Infor­ is more likely to occur If and when lic's preference for increased energy mation on comparative economics the energy problem becomes "real" production rather than conservation is necessary. People often overes­ to Individual consumers. This may ill\Jstrates this faith in technology. timate the cost and underestimate happen when the public appreciates . Consumers will conserve only .ff the benefits of Improving the energy the true nature of the energy tfiey know why they should, and efficiency of the home. Consumers situation. they will make personal sacrifices minimize the initial capital cost be­ only If they are sure the need is cause they do not know that the Who Is Responsible~ genuine and the burden is felt more expensive Item could save equally. During the gasoline short­ more money over time. ,. When asked who or what Is age In the summer of 1979, several responsible for the energy situa­ surveys 1 show that three-quarters Who Is Credible? tion, the American people have of the public would tolerate or even consistently blamed both the Amer­ willingly cut back on driving If they Before the public can accept and ican oil companies and the Middle were convinced that the shortage use practical energy Information, East oil-producing countries: How­ was real or that it would reduce de­ the source of that information must ever, most Americans acknowledge pendence on foreign oil. be regarded as credible and trust­ their own wasteful use of energy as worthy. Most research Indicates _ Americans have cultural norms a reason for the current situation. s that the Federal Government and which are contrary to conservation. large oil companies are generally But most Americans are also ready Materialism Is dominant, and suc­ to assume some responsibility for not trusted by consumers. This is cess Is defined In terms of conspic­ not surprising when we note the correcting it. In a poll for the Al­ uous consumption. In the past, the liance to Save Energy, three­ prevailing skepticism on the au­ lack of social pressure to conserve thenticity of the energy situation. quarters of the population now has contributed to consumers' fall• believe that Individual efforts to Among those considered as reli­ ure to take conservation actions. able sources are familiar institu• conserve energy will have "a great Similarly, conflicts exist between deal" or "a fair amount" of impact tlons and entities with a recognized conservafion objectives and other impartiality. They Include State and on the nation's energy consump­ desires, such as comfort and con­ local government units, local or­ tion. Most feel that personal con­ venience·.. People want to save ganizations, consumer and environ­ servation can contribute to this ef­ energy and be comfortable at the fort. Further, a majority of Ameri­ same time. Research conducted by mental groups, and universities. cans feel that current energy con­ Princeton University suggested that These entities are preferred because they are independent of any vested sumption, if not curtailed, will lead homeowners' attitudes about ther­ interest in the energy situation.
Recommended publications
  • A Contrasting Study of the Rainfall Anomalies Between Central Tibet and Central India During the Summer Monsoon Season of 1979
    A Contrasting Study of the Rainfall Anomalies between Central Tibet and Central C. C. Chang1 India during the Summer Institute of Atmospheric Physics Monsoon Season of 1979 Academia Sinica, Beijing Abstract ratio thus computed is classified into four categories: Based on a comparison of rainfall anomalies between central India Weak monsoon day (W): 0 < r < 0.5 and central Tibet in July and August 1979, a negative correlation be- Normal monsoon day (N): 0.5 < r < 1.5 tween them is found. When an active monsoon prevailed over cen- Strong monsoon day (S): 1.5 < r < 4.0 tral India, a break monsoon occurred over central Tibet, and vice versa. The large-scale circulation conditions for an active Indian Vigorous monsoon day (V): r > 4.0 monsoon are characterized by the presence of a large area of nega- tive height departures over the Indian Peninsula and large areas of Thus, we have a uniform and consistent standard of classi- positive height departures over central Tibet. On the other hand, the fication for the monsoon rainfalls on both sides of the circulation conditions responsible for a break monsoon in India Himalayas. are characterized by frequent wave-trough activity over Tibet and the regions to the west of Tibet, and by a dominating high-pressure area over the Indian Peninsula. 2. Comparison of the rainfall anomalies between cen- tral India and central Tibet 1. Methods of analysis Figure 1 shows time series of the rainfall ratio of central India The rainfall data were taken from the Indian Daily Weather (r7) and central Tibet (rc) for July and August 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Technical Papers
    Program Reports Report Title Copies Number Number 1: Program Prospectus. December 1963. 2 Program Design Report. February 1965. 2 Number 2: Supplement: 1968-1969 Work Program. February 1968. 1 Supplement: 1969-1970 Work Program. May 1969. 0 Number 3: Cost Accounting Manual. February 1965. 1 Number 4: Organizational Manual. February 1965. 2 Guide Plan: Central Offices for the Executive Branch of State Number 5: 2 Government. April1966. XIOX Users Manual for the IBM 7090/7094 Computer. November Number 6: 2 1966. Population Projections for the State of Rhode Island and its Number 7: 2 Municipalities--1970-2000. December 1966. Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Interim Report). Number 8: 2 February 1968. Rhode Island Transit Plan: Future Mass Transit Services and Number 9: 2 Facilities. June 1969. Plan for the Development and Use of Public Water Supplies. Number 10: 1 September 1969. Number 11: Plan for Public Sewerage Facility Development. September 1969. 2 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space (Second Interim Number 12: 2 Report). May 1970. Number 13: Historic Preservation Plan. September 1970. 2 Number 14: Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space. January 1971. 2 Number 15: A Department of Transportation for Rhode Island. March 1971. 2 State Airport System Plan (1970-1990). Revised Summary Report. Number 16: 2 December 1974. Number 17: Westerly Economic Growth Center, Planning Study. February 1973. 1 Plan for Recreation, Conservation, and Open Space--Supplement. June Number 18: 2 1973. Number 19: Rhode Island Transportation Plan--1990. January 1975. 2 Number 20: Solid Waste Management Plan. December 1973. 2 1 Number 21: Report of the Trail Advisory Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2013/072763 A3 ©
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/072763 A3 23 May 2013 (23.05.2013) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, A61K 31/4164 (2006.01) A61P 25/00 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, A61K 9/70 (2006.01) KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (21) International Application Number: NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, PCT/IB20 12/002797 RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (22) International Filing Date: TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, 16 November 2012 (16.1 1.2012) ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, (30) Priority Data: UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, 61/560,577 16 November 201 1 (16. 11.201 1) US TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, (71) Applicant: NOMETICS INC. [CA/CA]; Parteq, 1625 MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, Biosciences Complex, Queen's University, Queen's Univer TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, sity Biosciences Complex, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 (CA).
    [Show full text]
  • WHCA Video Log
    WHCA Video Log Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C1 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 1) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C2 9/23/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #1 (Tape 2) In Philadelphia, Domestic Issues BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C3 10/6/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #2 In San Francisco, Foreign Policy BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 ABC C4 10/15/1976 Mondale/Dole Debate BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C5 10/17/1976 Face the Nation with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C6 10/22/1976 Carter/Ford Debate #3 At William & Mary, not complete BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 90 NBC C7 11/1/1976 Carter Election Special BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C8 11/3/1976 Composite tape of Carter/Mondale activities 11/2-11/3/1976 BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C9 11/4/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C10 11/7/1976 Ski Scene with Walter Mondale BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WMAL C11 11/7/1976 Agronsky at Large with Mondale & Dole BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 WETA C12 11/29/1976 CBS Special with Cronkite & Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 CBS C13 12/3/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C14 12/13/1976 Mike Douglas Show with Lillian and Amy Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 CBS C15 12/14/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ALL C16 12/14/1976 Barbara Walters Special with Peters/Streisand and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC Page 1 of 92 Tape # Date Title Format Duration Network C17 12/16/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C18 12/21/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ALL C19 12/23/1976 Carter Press Conference BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 30 ABC C20 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 1) BetaSP, DigiBeta, VHS 60 ABC C21 12/29/1976 Good Morning America with Carter and Cabinet Members (Tape 2) Digital Files, Umatic 60 ABC C22 1/4/1977 Dinah Shore Show with Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Term # of Terms Total Years on the Council Presidencies # Of
    Country Term # of Total Presidencies # of terms years on Presidencies the Council Elected Members Algeria 3 6 4 2004 - 2005 December 2004 1 1988 - 1989 May 1988, August 1989 2 1968 - 1969 July 1968 1 Angola 2 4 2 2015 – 2016 March 2016 1 2003 - 2004 November 2003 1 Argentina 9 18 15 2013 - 2014 August 2013, October 2014 2 2005 - 2006 January 2005, March 2006 2 1999 - 2000 February 2000 1 1994 - 1995 January 1995 1 1987 - 1988 March 1987, June 1988 2 1971 - 1972 March 1971, July 1972 2 1966 - 1967 January 1967 1 1959 - 1960 May 1959, April 1960 2 1948 - 1949 November 1948, November 1949 2 Australia 5 10 10 2013 - 2014 September 2013, November 2014 2 1985 - 1986 November 1985 1 1973 - 1974 October 1973, December 1974 2 1956 - 1957 June 1956, June 1957 2 1946 - 1947 February 1946, January 1947, December 1947 3 Austria 3 6 4 2009 - 2010 November 2009 1 1991 - 1992 March 1991, May 1992 2 1973 - 1974 November 1973 1 Azerbaijan 1 2 2 2012 - 2013 May 2012, October 2013 2 Bahrain 1 2 1 1998 - 1999 December 1998 1 Bangladesh 2 4 3 2000 - 2001 March 2000, June 2001 2 Country Term # of Total Presidencies # of terms years on Presidencies the Council 1979 - 1980 October 1979 1 Belarus1 1 2 1 1974 - 1975 January 1975 1 Belgium 5 10 11 2007 - 2008 June 2007, August 2008 2 1991 - 1992 April 1991, June 1992 2 1971 - 1972 April 1971, August 1972 2 1955 - 1956 July 1955, July 1956 2 1947 - 1948 February 1947, January 1948, December 1948 3 Benin 2 4 3 2004 - 2005 February 2005 1 1976 - 1977 March 1976, May 1977 2 Bolivia 3 6 7 2017 - 2018 June 2017, October
    [Show full text]
  • Countercyclical U.S. Fertility and Its Implications William P
    Countercyclical U.S. Fertility and its Implications William P. Butz and Michael P. Ward* The following article is the verbatim text of a report based on research funded by the Social Security Administration and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the Rand Corporation. The report looks at changing fertility rates in the United States and their implications for future population size and age distributions. An economic model of fertility rates is used to explain observed differences in fertility rates among couples and to predict future rates. The focus is on trends since 1947 because post-World War 11 data are the most complete. Several explana- tions for changing fertility rates are examined, and their usefulness in predicting the future is evaluated. Predicting fertility rates is an important undertaking change is a temporary aberration or part of a longer-term because their consequences are far-reaching. Some short- shift that should be planned for. term consequences are evident in the first months or years These longer-term shifts are of great importance-politi- after a rise or fall in fertility occurs. Other longer-term cally, socially and economically. These effects result largely consequences,as for the social security system, emerge only from the fact changing fertility-along with mortality and after 20 to 50 years. past fertility-changes the age structure of the U.S. Consider the effects of the large decline in U.S. fertility population. during the last 20 years. The short-term effects of this Figure 1 illustrates this phenomenon. The configuration decline have ranged from empty hospital maternity wards on the left shows the percent of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Data
    Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks US Department of the Treasury Cost of Funds Report August 2011 Historical Data National Monthly Median Cost of Funds Ratio for OTS Regulated Institutions** ANNOUNCEMENT INDEX INDEX ANNOUNCEMENT INDEX INDEX DATE MONTH RATE% DATE MONTH RATE% N.A. January 1979 N.A. N.A. June 1982 11.38 N.A. February 1979 N.A. N.A. July 1982 11.54 N.A. March 1979 N.A. N.A. August 1982 11.50 N.A. April 1979 N.A. N.A. September 1982 11.17 N.A. May 1979 7.35 December 14, 1982 October 1982 10.91 N.A. June 1979 7.27 January 12, 1983 November 1982 10.62 N.A. July 1979 7.44 February 11, 1983 December 1982 10.43 N.A. August 1979 7.49 March 14, 1983 January 1983 10.14 N.A. September 1979 7.38 April 12, 1983 February 1983 9.75 N.A. October 1979 7.47 May 13, 1983 March 1983 9.72 N.A. November 1979 7.77 June 14, 1983 April 1983 9.62 N.A. December 1979 7.87 July 13, 1983 May 1983 9.62 N.A. January 1980 8.09 August 11, 1983 June 1983 9.54 N.A. February 1980 8.29 September 13, 1983 July 1983 9.65 N.A. March 1980 7.95 October 13, 1983 August 1983 9.81 N.A. April 1980 8.79 November 15, 1983 September 1983 9.74 N.A. May 1980 9.50 December 12, 1983 October 1983 9.85 N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 11/1979 Report
    NOVEMBER 1979 SURVEY Surveyso f ConsumerAttitude s Monitoring Economic Change Program F. Thomas Juster, Director George Katona, Founder Richard T. Curtin, Director Monitoring Economic Change Program Consumer Survey Program Surveys of Consumer Attitudes ADVANCE REPORT December 3, 1979 SHARPLY LOWER BUYING ATTITUDES * In the November 1979 survey, the Index of Consumer Sentiment was 63.3, 1.2 Index points above the 62.1 recorded in October, and 1.2 Index points below the 64.5 recorded in August 1979. Although the Index has remained largely unchanged since mid-1979, the current level of consumer sentiment representsa significant decline from ayea r ago when the Index figure was 75.0. The largest declines recorded in the November survey involved buying attitudes toward homes. *Amon g families with incomes of $15,000 or more, the Index of Consumer Sentiment stood at 57.2 in November, nearly2 Index points below the 59.1 recorded in August 1979, and 10Inde x points below the November 1978 reading (67.7). Among families with incomes of $20,000 and over, the Index value was 68.3 in November 1979, down from 70.0 in August, and 81.0 in November 1978. * The largely unchanged reading in the Index of Consumer Sentiment was due to off­ setting shifts in itssubcomponents . In the November survey, attitudes toward personal financial progress and buying conditions—thecurren t subcomponent—decl ined sharply in comparison to the August quarterlyreading . In contrast, attitudes toward short and long term business prospects improved somewhat in the November survey over the August readings. * Buying attitudes for houses declined sharply in the November 1979 survey.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board
    STATE OF HAWAII PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD In the Matter of ) Case No. SF-05-71 ) HAWAII STATE TEACHERS ) ASSOCIATION, NEA, ) Decision No. 123 ) Petitioner, ) ) and ) ) DONALD FREDERICK JENSEN, ) ) Intervenor. ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDERS On May 14, 1979, the Hawaii State Teachers Associa- tion (hereafter HSTA) petitioned this Board for Certification of Reasonableness of Service Fees. In its petition, the HSTA asked the Board to certify a service fee of $155.28 for the fiscal year September 1, 1979 to August 31, 1980 for the employees of Unit 5 (teachers and other personnel of the department of education under the same salary schedule). The present HSTA service fee of $148.19 per annum was approved by the Board in Decision 94 (rendered on November 8, 1978). Donald Frederick Jensen, an employee in Unit 5, petitioned for and was granted intervenor status in this case. Order No. 285 (September 6, 1979). After publication of legal notice in newspapers of general circulation, a hearing was held on September 10, 1979. Closing briefs were submitted by both the HSTA and the Inter- venor on October 1, 1979. Based upon the entire record herein, this Board makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and orders in the instant case. /23 FINDINGS OF FACT Petitioner HSTA is and was, at all times relevant, the certified exclusive representative of the employees in Unit 5. Intervenor Donald Frederick Jensen is a "public employee" as that term is defined by Subsection 89-2(7), Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereafter HRS), and is currently an included employee of Unit 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Management: a Comprehensive Bibliography. INSTITUTION National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, Colo
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 274 266 HE 019 706 AUTHOR Chaffee, Ellen Earle; de Alba, Renee TITLE Strategic Management: A Comprehensive Bibliography. INSTITUTION National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, Boulder, Colo. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE May 83 CONTRACT 400-80-0109 NOTE 37p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Administrator Responsibility; *Business Administration; *College Administration; College Environment; *College Planning; Decision Making; Higher Education; Organizational Change; Organizational Effectiveness; Policy Formation; *Retrenchment; Technological Advancement IDENTIFIERS *Strategic Management; *Strategic Planning ABSTRACT A bibliography on strategic management is presented to assist both practitioners and researchers. Criteria for inclusion were as follows: (1) general in scope, providing introductory information on a variety of subtopics within strategic management; (2) indications that the work is becoming a classic (i.e., frequent citations by other authors); (3) dealing specifically with the adaptation of an organization to changes in its external environment, or (4) relating strategic management concepts to higher education organizations. In addition, effort was made to include related works dealing with strategy as it relates to decline and recovery from decline. Each of the approximately 310 publications are identified by author, title, publisher, date, and issue numbers, when applicable. (SW)
    [Show full text]
  • 08/28/1979 VOCFR0828791 Category: FR
    08/28/1979 VOCFR0828791 Category: FR – Federal Register Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 168, 50371-50371, 8/28/1979 (1305-8), "State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for Proposed Rulemaking on Approval of Plan Revisions for Nonattainment Areas – Supplement. (on Revised Schedules for Submission of Volatile Organic Compound RACT Regulations)" Summary: Provisions of the Clean Air Act enacted in 1977 requires States to revise their State Implementation Plans for all area that have not attained National Ambient Air Quality Standards. States are to have submitted the necessary plan revisions to EPA by January 1, 1979. The Agency is now publishing proposals inviting public comment on whether each of the submittals should be approved. In the April 4, 1979 issue of the Federal Register, EPA published a General Preamble identifying and summarizing the major consideration that will guide EPA's evaluation of the submittals (44 FR 20372). Today's Supplement provides information of the revised schedule for adoption of regulations for source categories emitting volatile organic compounds (VOC) covered by the second set of Control Technique Guidelines (CTG's). Federal Register notice attached Federal Register / Vol. 44, No. 168 / Tuesday, August 28, 1979 / hposed Rules 50371 . rights, by the conversion of a security, National Ambient Alr Quality regulations by July 1,1980 for the by default of a loan where the qualifying Standards. States are to have submitted following source categories: employer security or qualifying the necessary plan revisions to EPA by Factory Surface Coating of Flatwood employer real property was security for January 1,1979. The Agency is now Paneling the loan, or in connection with the publishing proposals inviting public Patmleum Refinery Fugitive Emission WahoJ contribution of such securities or real comment on whether each of the Warmacentid hiamfactme property to thdplan.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaguer, August 1979
    The Leaguer USPS 267-840 The Official Publication of the University Interscholastic League VOL LXIV. NO. I AUGUST, 1979 AUSTIN, TEXAS Conferences offer early training Thousands of Texas high school stu­ academic champions," Marshall said. there will be no registration fee. The gional runners-up are eligible to apply dents will take the first step towards "Preparation for the contest is without sessions are free to all students and for TILF grants. possible successful careers in League doubt one of the most important factors teachers. Also, the State Board of Education academic and literary competition when in determining the various champions "We will have information at all con­ modified one of its administrative pro­ they attend one or more of nine student and these conferences are an excellent ferences concerning the Texas Inter­ cedures related to inservice days so that activities conferences, to be held at host means of preparing for the spring scholastic League Foundation scholar­ these conferences will count as inservice colleges statewide. meets. ships, which are awarded to selected credits. The student activities conferences are "I urge students and sponsors to at­ State Meet participants and to some re­ The board ruled that instructional designed to provide a trial run on sev­ tend the conference nearest them," he gional meet runners-up," Marshall said. workshops planned or sponsored by re­ eral contests, as well as furnish new added. "In June, we awarded more than gional education service centers, the ideas for competition training, said Dr. Instructional sessions in journalism, $185,000 in TILF grants and we hope Texas Education Agency, or other insti­ Bailey Marshall, League director.
    [Show full text]