DOCSLIB.ORG

Reform Review Anticipate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reform Review Anticipate SOUTH AFRICAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION THIRTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT 2008/2009 REVIEW REFORM ANTICIPATE THE PAST THE PRESENT THE FUTURE To Mr J T Radebe MP Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development I have the honour to submit to you, in terms of section 7(2) of the South African Law Reform Commission Act 19 of 1973, the Commission’s report on all its activities from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009 Yours sincerely Madam Justice JY Mokgoro Justice of the Constitutional Court Chairperson of the South African Law Reform Commission GALLERY OF COMMISSIONERS 2008/2009 Justice JY Mokgoro Judge WL Seriti Ms TN Madonsela Chairperson and Justice Vice-Chairperson and Full-time Member of the Constitutional Judge of the Gauteng Court North High Court Prof C Albertyn Judge DM Davies Mr NT Ngcukaitobi Professor of Law Judge President Practising Attorney University of the of the Competition Bowman Gilfillan Witwatersrand Appeal Court Incorporated Attorneys Advocate DB Ntsebeza SC Prof PJ Schwikkard Advocate M Sello Advocate of the High Court Dean of Law Advocate of the High of South Africa University of Cape Town Court of South Africa VISION MISSION To be a centre for excellence, producing The continuous reform ground-breaking research pivotal to the of the law of South Africa improvement and renewal of the legal in accordance with the system of South Africa principles and values of the Constitution to meet VALUES the needs of a changing In the execution of its duties the SALRC society operating under strives to uphold the values of equality, the rule of law integrity, inclusiveness, professionalism, impartiality, excellence, responsiveness, efficiency and respect for the dignity of others. The South African Law Reform Commission The offices of the South African Law Reform Commission are situated in the Middestad Centre (12th floor), corner of Andries and Schoeman Streets, Pretoria. The postal address is as follows: The Secretary Tel: (012) 392 9540 South African Law Reform Commission Fax: (012) 320 0936 Private Bag X668 E-mail: [email protected] Pretoria Internet: http://salawreform.justice.gov.za 0001 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CONTENTS Chapter 1: Overview 10 Chapter 2: Objects, constitution and functioning 16 Chapter 3: Progress report 28 Chapter 4: Reports completed 46 Chapter 5: Public relations 54 Chapter 6: Acknowlegdements 68 Annexure A: Issue papers published by the Commission 70 Annexure B: Discussion papers published by the Commission 72 Annexure C: Investigations included in Commission’s programme since its establishment 77 Annexure D: Members of the Commission in order of appointment 87 Annexure E: Advisory committees of the Commission and their members 89 Annexure F: Present programme of the Commission 94 Annexure G: Papers published by the Commission in its research series 95 1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW Introduction The reform of the law of South Africa is the core business of the South African Law Reform Commission. The South African Law Reform Commission Act 19 OVERVIEW of 1973 states in section 4 that the objects of the South African Law Reform Commission (SALRC) are to do research with reference to all branches of the law of the Republic of South Africa in order to make recommendations for the development, improvement, modernisation or reform thereof. However, before the SALRC can make recommendations for legal reform by executing its objects, the SALRC must be made aware of matters that require investigation. In terms of section 5 of the South African Law Reform Commission Act (SALRC Act) the Commission, in order to achieve its objects, must draw up a programme of CHAPTER the matters that in its opinion require consideration. It is significant that the SALRC Act states that the Commission may include in its programme any suggestion relating to its objects received from any 1 person or body. The fact that the SALRC may include law reform proposals for investigation in its programme irrespective of the status or capacity of the source of the proposal may be illustrated by examining the origin of some of the current investigations. The Project 25 subproject reviewing the South African statute book for constitutionality, redundancy and obsoleteness originated in a request from Cabinet following a submission by the Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development. Another Project 25 subproject, review of the Interpretation Act, as well as Project 124 - Privacy and data protection, are the result of a request from a parliamentary committee, the ad hoc Joint Committee on the Open Democracy Bill, 1998 (the Bill resulted in the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 1998). The Project 100 subproject on custody and access to minor children originated from a family adviser at the Bloemfontein office of the Family Advocate, who became aware of particular problems with access to children after divorce during research for her Master’s degree in social work. The other current Project 100 subproject, review of aspects of matrimonial property 10 THIRTY-SIXTH SALRC ANNUAL REPORT 2008/2009 law, was approved subsequent to among others a The first set of criteria is used to determine whether a complaint lodged with the Commission for Gender proposal should be rejected even before a preliminary Equality by a member of the public in respect of so- investigation is done. It creates a sifting mechanism called ‘joint’ bank accounts. to reduce the number of preliminary investigations. If the proposal does not meet the initial criteria set for Project 122, the investigation into assisted decision- inclusion, it is rejected and a recommendation on this making with regard to adults with impaired decision- basis is made to the Commission for consideration. making capacity, was approved after a request for such However, where the initial criteria are met, a preliminary an investigation was received from a member of the investigation is indicated and the second set of criteria public. Project 124, the investigation into prescription is then used to evaluate the proposal and to determine periods, was referred to the SALRC on request of the the ultimate inclusion or rejection of the proposal. Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development following a recommendation by the Portfolio Committee Whereas all the initial criteria need to be met when for Justice and Constitutional Development. Project deciding whether to go ahead with a preliminary investigation, a proposal need not meet all the secondary criteria to “It is significant that the SALRC Act states that the be included in the programme. All Commission may include in its programme any the criteria in the second phase suggestion relating to its objects received from are considered and such weight is attached to a specific matter as the any person or body.” Commission deems appropriate in the circumstances of each case. 126, the review of the law of evidence, emanates from a proposal by a SALRC committee that had The criteria used in the two-phased approach are the been appointed to look into the simplification of following: criminal procedure. 1. Criteria used in the initial sifting process to Given the human and financial resources and the determine whether a proposal should be subjected amount of time expended on an investigation, it is to a preliminary investigation or whether it should clear that the SALRC is unable to investigate each and be dealt with summarily every proposal received. Since many more proposals are received than what are possible for the SALRC to a. Whether the issues concerned are predom- deal with at a given time, it is clear that the SALRC inantly legal needs some method to determine when a proposal for an investigation will be entertained and when it b. Whether the legal problem can be addressed will be rejected. Although proposals for investigation in a way that does not require a change of the are subjected to preliminary investigation, even a law, for example through a mere change in preliminary investigation takes up valuable time and policy or improved implementation of existing resources and may not always be necessary. legislation After the period of introspection that the SALRC had c. Whether there is another institution or embarked upon as alluded to in Chapter 1 of the SALRC’s government department better placed to deal 2007 / 2008 Annual Report, it became clear that the with the topic in question SALRC had to develop selection criteria to determine which proposals should be taken on as investigations, d. Pending legal developments (for example starting with a decision on which proposals should be court cases or other draft legislation) that could subjected to preliminary investigation. The selection influence the relevance of the investigation criteria therefore provide for a two-phased process to determine the inclusion of an investigation in the SALRC’s programme. CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW 11 e. The availability of current resources in terms of The procedure explained above to determine the ultimate capacity, funding and the effective management inclusion or rejection of a proposal for investigation has of the research programme already been implemented and has proved to be a success. In addition to affording the SALRC a valuable 2. Second phase criteria used in conjunction with tool to assist with the execution of its objects, it also those set out in 1 above during a preliminary gives potential proposers of investigations an indication investigation of the issues that are taken into consideration when a proposal is considered, thus facilitating the submission a. Extent to which the law is unsatisfactory (for and motivation of investigations. example unconstitutional, unduly complex, inaccessible or outdated) Commission b. Scale of the problem in terms of the proportion of the community affected The Commission appointed under section 3 of the South African Law Reform Commission Act 19 of 1973, c. Potential benefits likely to accrue from with effect from 1 January 2007, continued its excellent undertaking reform or repeal of the law work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary As a Site of the Struggle for Political Power: a South African Perspective
    The judiciary as a site of the struggle for political power: A South African perspective Freddy Mnyongani: [email protected] Department of Jurisprudence, University of South Africa (UNISA) 1. Introduction In any system of government, the judiciary occupies a vulnerable position. While it is itself vulnerable to domination by the ruling party, the judiciary must at all times try to be independent as it executes its task of protecting the weak and vulnerable of any society. History has however shown that in most African countries, the judiciary has on a number of occasions succumbed to the domination of the ruling power. The struggle to stay in power by the ruling elite is waged, among others, in the courts where laws are interpreted and applied by judges who see their role as the maintenance of the status quo. To date, a typical biography of a post-independence liberation leader turned president would make reference to a time spent in jail during the struggle for liberation.1 In the post-independence Sub-Saharan Africa, the situation regarding the role of the judiciary has not changed much. The imprisonment of opposition leaders, especially closer to elections continues to be a common occurrence. If not that, potential opponents are subjected to charges that are nothing but a display of power and might. An additional factor relates to the disputes surrounding election results, which inevitably end up in court. The role of the judiciary in mediating these disputes, which are highly political in nature, becomes crucial. As the tension heats up, the debate regarding the appointment of judges, their ideological background and their independence or lack thereof, become fodder for the media.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Women on South Africa's Courts Make a Difference?
    Do Women on South Africa’s Courts Make a Difference? Do Women on South Africa’s Courts Make a Difference? *By Ruth B. Cowan Research assistance provided by Colleen Normile Women’s presence on the bench in South Africa began in 1994 with the end of apartheid. As Justice Yvonne Mokgoro observes in the documentary Courting Justice, during the hundreds of preceding years “ I guess there was no thought that women could also serve.” More accurately, what kept women off the bench were the thoughts that women , unsuited by nature, could never serve. The post apartheid Constitution, setting forth a human rights- based constitutional democracy, dismissed these notions and mandated the consideration of women when making judicial appointments. The appointments were to be made to what was now to be an independent judiciary. The apartheid judiciary had not been independent—its charge was to assure the validation of apartheid’s legislation, executive regulations and official actions. Yet, these courts were to be retained, as were the judges and court personnel whose record was hostile to the very human rights which the judiciary was now charged to protect. The Constitution did create one new court ; i.e., the Constitutional Court . It was charged with and limited to considering cases in which constitutional issues were raised. Given the continued engagement of the apartheid judges --all but two of whom were white males and almost all of whom were energetic in support of apartheid’s oppressive and repressive laws and brutal actions, the transformation of the judiciary by race and gender was and continues to be verbally embraced as a high priority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extraordinary Journey of Justice Yvonne Mokgoro
    BREAKING THE CHAINS OF DISCRIMINATION AND FORGING NEW BONDS: THE EXTRAORDINARY JOURNEY OF HAPTER JUSTICE YVONNE MOKGORO C 5 Narnia Bohler-Muller, Marie Wentzel & Johan Viljoen Source: http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/judges/justiceyvonnemokgoro/index1.html 1Introduction In this chapter we make an attempt to highlight the main contributions of Justice Yvonne Mokgoro to South African constitutional jurisprudence. As the first black African woman appointed to the Bench in 1994, she brought with her fresh scars of the oppressive system of apartheid that alienated and marginalised her as a black person and as a woman. Her childhood and youth were marked by the struggle; her first encounter with Robert Sobukwe put her firmly on a path of resistance to injustice. As a member of the Constitutional Court Justice Mokgoro was active and engaged, with her most lasting contribution being her efforts to Africanise human rights through the dignification of the law and the operationalisation of ubuntu as a constitutional value. The three cases discussed in this chapter are chosen to illustrate the powerful and unique impact of her judgments and philosophies. In 102 Justice Yvonne Mokgoro 103 Makwanyane (the constitutionalism of the death penalty), Khosa (the right of foreign nationals to social grants) and Dikoko (determining the quantum of damages in defamation cases) Mokgoro brought to bear her life views and expressed them in ways that continue to shape the ubuntu jurisprudence of the Court. Even post-Bench she has continued to live out her convictions that the Constitution should reflect values that South Africans can accept as their own in order to ensure its legitimacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Yvonne Mokgoro, Doctor of Laws
    CITATION: YVONNE MOKGORO Justice Yvonne Mokgoro was appointed Justice of the Constitutional Court in 1994 and served that Court until 2009. She is known and admired for her commitment to sociological jurisprudence particularly in the fields of human rights, customary law and the impact of law on society generally, and on women and children specifically. She was born in Galeshewe Township near Kimberley and matriculated at the local St Boniface High School in 1970. She studied at the University of Bophuthatswana from 1982 to 1987 where she obtained the B.luris LLB and LLM degrees. She has also been awarded a LLM degree by the University of Pennsylvania. Her work experience prior to her judicial career covered a wide field including nursing, sales, clerking and employment as a maintenance officer and public prosecutor. Her passion and interest in education and research was evidenced by her employment at various academic institutions including the universities of Bophuthatswana, Western Cape and Pretoria as well as teaching at universities in the United Kingdom, the United States of America and the Netherlands. Her courses included Constitutional Law, Human Rights Jurisprudence, Comparative Law and Customary Law, and she rose to the rank of an associate professor. She was also employed as a specialist researcher (human rights) at the Centre for Constitutional Analysis at the Human Science Research Council. In the course of her legal career she participated in a number of research projects and held positions on various non- governmental organisations including community-based organisations and other initiatives in South Africa and internationally where she was used extensively as a resource person.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmony and Discord in South African Foreign Policy Making
    Composers, conductors and players: Harmony and discord in South African foreign policy making TIM HUGHES KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG • OCCASIONAL PAPERS • JOHANNESBURG • SEPTEMBER 2004 © KAS, 2004 All rights reserved While copyright in this publication as a whole is vested in the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung, copyright in the text rests with the individual authors, and no paper may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both authors and the publisher. It should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual authors and that the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung does not necessarily subscribe to the opinions of contributors. ISBN: 0-620-33027-9 Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 60 Hume Road Dunkeld 2196 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa PO Box 1383 Houghton 2041 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa Telephone: (+27 +11) 214-2900 Telefax: (+27 +11) 214-2913/4 E-mail: [email protected] www.kas.org.za Editing, DTP and production: Tyrus Text and Design Cover design: Heather Botha Reproduction: Rapid Repro Printing: Stups Printing Foreword The process of foreign policy making in South Africa during its decade of democracy has been subject to a complex interplay of competing forces. Policy shifts of the post-apartheid period not only necessitated new visions for the future but also new structures. The creation of a value-based new identity in foreign policy needed to be accompanied by a transformation of institutions relevant for the decision-making process in foreign policy. Looking at foreign policy in the era of President Mbeki, however, it becomes obvious that Max Weber’s observation that “in a modern state the actual ruler is necessarily and unavoidably the bureaucracy, since power is exercised neither through parliamentary speeches nor monarchical enumerations but through the routines of administration”,* no longer holds in the South African context.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Making the Road.Fm
    INTRODUCTION HAPTER C 1 Michael Cosser, Narnia Bohler-Muller & Gary Pienaar 1Introduction 1.1 Making the road by walking The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, the final draft of which was forged over a two-year period between 1994 and 1996, assumed a particular profile in the body politic in 2016. Following the release of the Public Protector’s 2014 report on improvements to President Zuma’s Nkandla residence,1 the Constitutional Court in March 2016 declared binding her findings and recommendations about the need for the President to repay public monies spent on non-security upgrades to his residence.2 Such high-profile cases, however, can distract us from the importance of the Constitution in shaping the lives of ordinary people. In catapulting the Constitution into the limelight, the ‘Nkandla judgement’, as it is known colloquially, has created renewed interest in what meaning the Constitution has for South Africans in 2018 and beyond. The initial impetus for this book came from a public address by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo. Delivered on 30 June 2016 and entitled ‘Why does the Constitution matter?’, his address began with an almost throwaway comment: that he was ‘privileged enough … to participate in constructing our foundational jurisprudence on constitutional law.’3 Ngcobo went on to say that the process of building a constitutional 1 Public Protector South Africa ‘Secure in comfort’ http://www.pprotect.org/library/ investigation_report/2013-14/Final Report 19 March 2014 pdf (accessed 23 May 2017). 2 Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Yvonne Mokgoro Constitutional Court Oral History Project 24 November 2011 Int I'm Interviewing Justice Yvonne Mokgoro At
    Yvonne Mokgoro Constitutional Court Oral History Project 24 November 2011 Int I’m interviewing Justice Yvonne Mokgoro at the Constitutional Court, and today is the 24th of November, 2011. Yvonne, thank you so much for agreeing to participate in the Constitutional Court Oral History Project. YM You’re most welcome. Int You’ve been a key member to us from the very beginning, as part of the (Constitutional Court Oral History) steering committee, so we value your narrative very much. YM Thank you. Int I wondered whether we could start…much has been written about you, but I’ve not had an opportunity to interview you before, so I wondered if you could start at the very beginning, and talk about your early memories, where you were born, and what was your particular life trajectory that led you to work in the area of social justice? YM Well, I was born in Galeshewe, which is the township attached to Kimberley. And I grew up as one of, say, biologically nine children, but socially eight. Because when I was born, by that time the firstborn child of my parents had passed on. So I grew up as the second child in the family of eight siblings, six girls and two boys. And as it usually is in African tradition…maybe in other traditions too…when you’re the second born child, especially when you’re a girl during those days, you had quite a bit of responsibility to your siblings, their well-being. Both parents were of working class, had nine to five jobs, and most of the house chores were done by us, and you had the responsibility to see to either those house chores are done, and other creative tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Delicate Balance the Place of the Judiciary in a Constitutional Democracy
    A Delicate Balance THE PLACE OF THE JUDICIARY IN A CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY A Delicate Balance THE PLACE OF THE JUDICIARY IN A CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY PROCEEDINGS OF A SYMPOSIUM TO MARK THE RETIREMENT OF ARTHUR CHASKALSON Former Chief Justice of the Republic of South Africa Presented by SCHOOL OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND and THE SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS Edited by JONATHAN KLAAREN BA (Harvard), MA (Cape Town), JD (Columbia), LL B (Witwatersrand), Ph D (Yale) Professor of Law, Director of the Mandela Institute, University of the Witwatersrand 2006 Published in association with The School of Law, University of the Witwatersrand First published 2006 by Siber Ink CC PO Box 30702 Tokai 7966 Cape Town SOUTH AFRICA www.siberink.co.za ISBN 1-920025-12-X This book is copyright under the Berne Convention. In terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978 no part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechan- ical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cover: James Berrangé Set by GJ du Toit Fine Typography Printed and bound by Creda Communications (Pty) Ltd, Cape Town Preface In May 2005, Arthur Chaskalson retired from the Constitutional Court bench. An eminent human rights lawyer during the apartheid era, he was appointed the first President of South Africa’s Constitutional Court in 1994. He became Chief Justice in 2001, following constitutional amendments that combined the offices of President of the Constitutional Court and the head of the South African judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimation by Constitution (And the News from South Africa)
    Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Frank I. Michelman, Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa), 44 Val. U. L. Rev. 1015 (2010). Published Version http://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol44/iss4/1/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12942309 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 44 pp.1015-1034 Number 4 Symposium on The Civil Rights of Public School Students Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa) Frank I. Michelman Recommended Citation Frank I. Michelman, Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa), 44 Val. U. L. Rev. 1015 (2010). Available at: http://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol44/iss4/1 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Michelman: Legitimation by Constitution (and the News from South Africa) Symposium, The Civil Rights of Public School Students 2009 Edward A. Seegers Lecture LEGITIMATION BY CONSTITUTION (AND THE NEWS FROM SOUTH AFRICA) Frank I.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Group-Related Rivalries in Highly Polarized Communities
    ASPJ Africa & Francophonie - 1st Quarter 2013 Regulating Group-Related Rivalries in Highly Polarized Communities JOHAN D. VAN DER VYVER, PHD* n May 2011, I and 10 other so-called international experts accepted an invitation to Kathmandu to address problems encountered by the Constitutional Assembly of Nepal in the drafting of a new constitu- tion for that country. Since its creation in 1768 as a unified state and until not so long ago, Nepal was proclaimed a Hindu state, constitutionally Istructured as a monarchy. The country’s very first meaningful constitution, adopted in 1990, formally endorsed this state of affairs. Dissatisfaction with the constitution prompted a Maoist insurgency which plunged the country into a decade-long civil war that brought about approximately 17,500 casu- alties. The adversaries concluded a 12-point peace agreement in 2005, an interim constitution took effect, and the king abdicated in 2008 (he now lives in the country as an ordinary citizen, and his palace has become a museum). The first president, Dr. Ram Baran Yadav, took office on 23 July 2008 under the current interim constitution. A Constitutional Assembly was established to draft a final constitution that would address—and seek to overcome—the causes of unrest in the country. *The author is the I. T. Cohen Professor of International Law and Human Rights at the School of Law, Emory University. His current teaching obligations include Public International Law, International Human Rights, International Criminal Law, International Humanitarian Law, and Comparative Constitutional Law. He also serves as an Extraordinary Professor in the Department of Private Law at the University of Pretoria, South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Making the Road by Wal
    2018 Making the road by walking: The evolution of the South African Constitution Published by: Pretoria University Law Press (PULP) The Pretoria University Law Press (PULP) is a publisher at the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria, South Africa. PULP endeavours to publish and make available innovative, high-quality scholarly texts on law in Africa. PULP also publishes a series of collections of legal documents related to public law in Africa, as well as text books from African countries other than South Africa. This book was peer reviewed prior to publication. For more information on PULP, see www.pulp.up.ac.za Printed and bound by: BusinessPrint, Pretoria To order, contact: PULP Faculty of Law University of Pretoria South Africa 0002 Tel: +27 12 420 4948 Fax: +27 86 610 6668 [email protected] www.pulp.up.ac.za Cover: Kirsten Cosser Yolanda Booyzen, Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria Photo credit: The Constitutional Court website – www.constitutionalcourt.org.za ISBN: 978-1-920538-75-0 © 2018 For Nelson Rolihlala Mandela, who walked long with us and whose walk has not yet ended TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ix Contributors xi Introduction 1 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Making the road by walking 1 1.2 The composition of the first Bench 3 1.3 The evolution of the South African Constitution 6 1.4 Social justice 8 1.5 Constitutional interpretation and amendment 11 1.6 The limits of constitutional transformation 14 1.7 Do we really need the Constitution? 16 2 Structure of the book 18 2.1 Lourens Ackermann 19 2.2 Richard Goldstone 20 2.3 Johann
    [Show full text]