DOCSLIB.ORG

Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Assessment by Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Assessment by Region Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan 2012 Update Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Assessment by Region April 2011 Prepared by CDM under a cooperative agreement between the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Contents Section 1 - Executive Summary 1.1 OCWP Methodology .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Regional Cost Estimates .......................................................................... 1-4 Section 2 - Cost Estimating Approach 2.1 Background: EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Assessment ... 2-1 2.2 OCWP Regional Cost Development ......................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 OCWP Method: A General Overview ......................................... 2-3 2.2.2 OCWP Method: Selecting Providers ......................................... 2-6 2.2.3 OCWP Method: Developing Project List ................................... 2-7 2.2.4 OCWP Method: Summation of Projects ................................... 2-9 Section 3 - Summary of Regional Water Drinking Water Infrastructure Costs Section 4 - Beaver-Cache Regional Infrastructure Costs 4.1 Beaver-Cache – Regional Description .................................................... 4-1 4.2 Beaver-Cache – Developing Project Lists ............................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Beaver-Cache – Large Water Providers ................................... 4-1 4.2.1.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 4-1 4.2.1.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 4-2 4.2.1.3 Summary ................................................................ 4-2 4.2.2 Beaver-Cache – Medium Water Providers .............................. 4-3 4.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 4-3 4.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 4-4 4.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 4-4 4.2.3 Beaver-Cache – Small Water Providers ................................... 4-5 4.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 4-6 4.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 4-7 4.2.3.3 Summary ................................................................ 4-8 4.3 Beaver-Cache – Regional Major Reservoir Projects .............................. 4-9 4.4 Beaver-Cache – Regional Cost Summary ............................................. 4-10 Section 5 - Blue Boggy Regional Infrastructure Costs 5.1 Blue Boggy – Regional Description ......................................................... 5-1 5.2 Blue Boggy – Developing Project Lists ................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Blue Boggy – Large Water Providers ....................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Blue Boggy – Medium Water Providers ................................... 5-1 5.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 5-2 5.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 5-3 5.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 5-3 5.2.3 Blue Boggy – Small Water Providers ....................................... 5-4 i Contents 5.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 5-5 5.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 5-6 5.2.3.3 Summary ................................................................ 5-7 5.3 Blue Boggy – Regional Major Reservoir Projects ................................... 5-8 5.4 Blue Boggy – Regional Cost Summary.................................................... 5-8 Section 6 - Central Regional Infrastructure Costs 6.1 Central – Regional Description ............................................................... 6-1 6.2 Central – Developing Project Lists .......................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Central – Large Water Providers .............................................. 6-1 6.2.1.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 6-2 6.2.1.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 6-3 6.2.1.3 Summary ................................................................ 6-3 6.2.2 Central – Medium Water Providers ......................................... 6-4 6.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 6-6 6.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 6-7 6.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 6-9 6.2.3 Central – Small Water Providers ............................................ 6-10 6.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ..................................... 6-12 6.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ....................................... 6-13 6.2.3.3 Summary .............................................................. 6-14 6.3 Central – Regional Major Reservoir Projects ....................................... 6-14 6.4 Central – Regional Cost Summary ........................................................ 6-16 Section 7 - Eufaula Regional Infrastructure Costs 7.1 Eufaula – Regional Description ............................................................... 7-1 7.2 Eufaula – Developing Project Lists ......................................................... 7-1 7.2.1 Eufaula – Large Water Providers ............................................. 7-1 7.2.2 Eufaula – Medium Water Providers ......................................... 7-1 7.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 7-2 7.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 7-4 7.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 7-4 7.2.3 Eufaula – Small Water Providers ............................................. 7-5 7.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 7-7 7.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 7-8 7.2.3.3 Summary ................................................................ 7-9 7.3 Eufaula – Regional Major Reservoir Projects ....................................... 7-10 7.4 Eufaula – Regional Cost Summary ....................................................... 7-11 Section 8 - Grand Regional Infrastructure Costs 8.1 Grand – Regional Description ................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Grand – Developing Project Lists ............................................................ 8-1 ii Contents 8.2.1 Grand – Large Water Providers ................................................ 8-1 8.2.2 Grand – Medium Water Providers ........................................... 8-1 8.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 8-3 8.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 8-3 8.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 8-4 8.2.3 Grand – Small Water Providers................................................ 8-5 8.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 8-7 8.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 8-8 8.2.3.3 Summary ................................................................ 8-8 8.3 Grand – Regional Major Reservoir Projects ........................................... 8-9 8.4 Grand – Regional Cost Summary .......................................................... 8-11 Section 9 - Lower Arkansas Regional Infrastructure Costs 9.1 Lower Arkansas – Regional Description ................................................. 9-1 9.2 Lower Arkansas – Developing Project Lists ........................................... 9-1 9.2.1 Lower Arkansas – Large Water Providers ............................... 9-1 9.2.2 Lower Arkansas – Medium Water Providers ........................... 9-1 9.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 9-3 9.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 9-4 9.2.2.3 Summary ................................................................ 9-4 9.2.3 Lower Arkansas – Small Water Providers ............................... 9-5 9.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ....................................... 9-7 9.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ......................................... 9-8 9.2.3.3 Summary ................................................................ 9-8 9.3 Lower Arkansas – Regional Major Reservoir Projects ........................... 9-9 9.4 Lower Arkansas – Regional Cost Summary.......................................... 9-10 Section 10 - Lower Washita Regional Infrastructure Costs 10.1 Lower Washita – Regional Description ................................................. 10-1 10.2 Lower Washita – Developing Project Lists ........................................... 10-1 10.2.1 Lower Washita – Large Water Providers ............................... 10-1 10.2.2 Lower Washita – Medium Water Providers ........................... 10-1 10.2.2.1 Surface Water Providers ..................................... 10-3 10.2.2.2 Groundwater Providers ....................................... 10-3 10.2.2.3 Summary .............................................................. 10-5 10.2.3 Lower Washita – Small Water Providers ............................... 10-6 10.2.3.1 Surface Water Providers ..................................... 10-7 10.2.3.2 Groundwater Providers ....................................... 10-8 10.2.3.3 Summary .............................................................. 10-9 10.3 Lower Washita – Regional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact of Recreational Use at Two New Lakes in Oklahoma: Kaw And
    102 IMPACT OF RECREATION USE AT TWO NEW LAKES IN OKLAHOMA: KAW AND HUGO* Vanessa Lenard and Daniel D. Badger Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 Outdoor recreation in Oklahoma is closely related to water. Even people who don't like swimming or boating like lakeside scenery for camping or picnicking. After Kaw and Hugo lakes were constructed in Oklahoma, the recreational visits to these lakes increased very rapidly in the first full year of operation. Yet those visitations, i.e., the recreational use at these two new lakes, does not appear to have adversely affected recreational use at nearby lakes, such as Keystone and Pine Creek. Participation in such recreation activities has created a new "water-oriented" image of Oklahoma, in sharp contrast to that of the early-1900's frontier days or the image of the dust bowl era of the 1930's. Another impact of participation in recreation is economic―the incomes and jobs generated by the expenditures of people who engage in these activities. Recreation and tourism are associated with the expenditures on everything from fishing bait to hotel rooms, which result in increased tax revenues, employment, and income. INTRODUCTION Kaw Lake and Hugo Lake were constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as part of the flood control programs on major rivers in Oklahoma. Kaw Lake, completed in 1976, is located on the Arkansas River, in Osage and Kay counties, east of Ponca City in North Central Oklahoma. Being an integral part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, it has multiple purposes of navigation, flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiamichi River Basin Water Resources Development Plan
    FINAL REPORT KIAMICHI RIVER BASIN WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PLAN Kiamichi River Basin Working Group Pursuant to HCR 1066 February 1, 2000 Prepared by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Duane A. Smith, Executive Director STATE Of OKlAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Fobfuaty 22, 2000 'os <lired«l """'" HeR 1066. tfle ~ol the Oklahoma Wal... ReOO<ltCU Boa,d henOy to<maIy..- '" "'" "8Ih 0kIa00mll SIa'a l",tura 1ha Kiamm _ Baoin Wata, AMoutcaI o.,."""",*~Plan Final Raporl. Wa ~ "'" Kiamdli _ Basin WOfI<ing G""", kit their -..lion and altO'! in ~ "'" OWR6 in 1" 01_ plan Th<l OWRB III commill"" 10 tM _ ~ 01 Oklal>oma'a wal... .-.'" tt>iI '''II'''d and ~t"';!hIha PIan'a 0XlrJl<lnI0na princopIa _ 1, .. III out <My 10 ........ Iha1 lila pr• ....-.t and luturtI _lor ....t.... by dOl<la!>:>mans or. addo ,os"" ""'" "'" l'O;I>IIl priority __,,, _ OkIoOOmllrlO 'asOding .,.;"., lh/I Kiamicni River Baoin. Wa ruHim'l the princopIa 11>01 OklaOOmll" wal", io '"'aM tor""""", tor Okl.ohomllno. Th<l Plan'. ~tior1lOclnolop _ Slatarrnbal walo&l' """'"4l"Cl pi(M(Io•• ..-.qua opportunoIy '" _ ""'" "'" CIIocto"",Cl>icI<aIllW ""liorlI"" ""'~ __lIO"lo tOf wal... <11•..."..,_, W. _ lNilllli\lOting ltI<I 0WTl0fI!lIp 01 wat only _."'" Slat. aM Trbaa. Through worlUno;J "'II"U- to find """"""" ground, can ~ 10 muctl mora tor "'" """""" 0I~.... Oklahoma, FurlMmlo<tI. we ~ any ...t", raoouroao <lI\ ,I"""te< II ot'al&gy Of plan lllat <;<>i,JId Iimrt Of ja<>par<lz. proopacIlI tor futur. g"""'" _ ~ """"""'""*" in _01 OkIat>om,o or _a in tM ....ta.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Meeting Material
    Richardson Lovewell Washington State County Surface Ownership and BIA- Wildlife Lovewell Fishing Lake And Falls City Reservoir Wildlife Area St. Francis Keith Area Brown State Wildlife Sebelius Lake Norton Phillips Brown State Fishing Lake And Area Cheyenne (Norton Lake) Wildlife Area Smith County Washington Marshall Wildlife Area County Lovewell Nemaha Fishing Lake County State ¤£77 County Wildlife administered Tribal and Allotted 36 Rawlins State Park Fishing Lake Sabetha ¤£ Decatur Norton Area County Republic County Norton County Marysville ¤£75 36 36 Brown County ¤£ £36 County ¤£ Washington Phillipsburg ¤ Jewell County Nemaha County Doniphan County St. Subsurface Minerals Estate £283 County Joseph ¤ Atchison State Kirwin National Glen Elder Jamestown Tuttle Fishing Lake Wildlife Refuge Reservoir Sherman (Waconda Lake) Wildlife Area Creek Atchison State Fishing Webster Lake 83 State Glen Elder Lake And Wildlife Area County ¤£ Sheridan Nicodemus Tuttle Pottawatomie State Thomas County Park Webster Lake Wildlife Area Concordia State National Creek State Fishing Lake No. Atchison Parks 159 BIA-managed tribal and allotted subsurface Fishing Lake Historic Site Rooks County 1 And Wildlife ¤£ Fort Colby Cloud County Atchison Leavenworth Goodland 24 Beloit Clay County Holton 70 ¤£ Sheridan Osborne Riley County §¨¦ 24 County Glen Elder ¤£ Jackson 73 County Graham County Rooks State County ¤£ minerals estate State Park Mitchell Clay Center Pottawatomie County Sherman State Fishing Lake And ¤£59 Leavenworth Wildlife Area County County Fishing
    [Show full text]
  • Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, Furnished with Your Letter Dated 21 September 1973
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT HUOO LAKE KIAMICHI RIVER, OKLAHOMA Prepared by TULSA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENC,INKERS TULSA, OKLAHOMA February 1974 Statement of Findings Hugo Lake, Kiamichi River Basin, Oklahoma As Acting District Engineer, Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers, it is my duty in the role of responsible Federal Official to evaluate project data presented in the environmental statement, draw conclusions, and make recommendations to my higher authority. The overall public interest has been given the utmost consideration and personal concern in my review and evaluation of the documents concerning the proposed action, as well as the stated views of other interested agencies and the public, relative to the various alternatives in accomplishing the purposes of flood con­ trol, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Therefore, I have both a professional and personal concern in drawing the soundest possible conclusions from the studies, observations, and consultations made in the investigation of Hugo Lake. Project formulation studies for Hugo Lake occurred prior to the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act. During those studies public meetings, informal meetings, and workshops were conducted within the project area to determine public preferences, opinions, needs, and objectives. All project-related information derived from these meetings was carefully evaluated during plan formulation and was incorporated into the planning ana development of Hugo Lake for the total public interest. The construction of the project was 83 percent complete on 31 October 1973. A draft environmental statement was completed and released for review by other agencies, groups, and individuals on 21 September 1973. The final statement was then prepared utilizing comments received on the draft statement, technical assistance from the University of Oklahoma, and additional environmental studies by the Corps of Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas
    Volume 2021 Article 1 2021 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Timothy K. Perttula None Duncan McKinnon Scott Hammerstedt University of Oklahoma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K.; McKinnon, Duncan; and Hammerstedt, Scott (2021) "The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2021, Article 1. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/1 1 The Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Ethnography, Ethnohistory, and History Bibliography of the Caddo Indian Peoples of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas Compiled by Timothy K.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily d vendant upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image o f the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4 . The m ajority o f users indicate th at the textual content is o f greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clayton Lake State Park Resource Management Plan Pushmataha County, Oklahoma
    Clayton Lake State Park Resource Management Plan Pushmataha County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. 6/30/2015 Hung Ling (Stella) Liu, Ph.D. I-Chun (Nicky) Wu, Ph.D. Updated: December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. i Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. The essential staff providing assistance for the development of the RMP included Gary Daniel, manager of Clayton Lake State Park, and Johnny Moffitt, Associate Director of Little Dixie Action Agency, Inc. In addition, John Parnell, manager of Raymond Gary State Park, and Ron Reese, manager of Hugo Lake State Park, attended the initial meetings for Clayton Lake State Park and provided insight into management issues. Assistance was also provided by Kris Marek, Doug Hawthorne, Don Shafer and Ron McWhirter – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. Merle Cox, Regional Manager of the Southeastern Region of Oklahoma State Parks also attended these meetings and assisted throughout the project. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Regents Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078 ii Abbreviations and Acronyms ADAAG ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Pathfinder Travel Guide
    PATHFINDER FALL / WINTER 2021 ChoctawCountry.com Indulge your curiosity. HALITO! [Hello] It is with great pride that I welcome you to Choctaw Country! When the air starts to cool down and the leaves begin to change, I find myself getting excited. In Choctaw Country, there are so many wonderful things to look forward to during the fall and winter seasons! Take a brisk (or long) hike through the stunning fall foliage, find some of the greatest hunting and fishing spots for miles around, or treat yourself during perfect camping temperatures to a spectacular view of the stars. Whether you are looking for a peaceful retreat or a weekend adventure, our community members are here to welcome you with open arms and true Southern hospitality. At every turn, you will find history, nature, excitement and, most importantly, culture. So, come experience the Choctaw Nation and see for yourselves! Chi Pisa La Chike! [Be seeing you] Chief Gary Batton 3 Stray from the beaten path. CONTENTS EVENTS CAMPING & LODGING 6 24 SOCIAL MEDIA HIKING 9 26 COFFEE SHOP STOPS FISHING 10 28 SATISFY YOUR SWEET TOOTH HUNTING 12 30 BREWERIES/DISTILLERIES/ MOTORCYCLE TOURING WINERIES 32 14 STARGAZING CULTURAL CENTER 34 16 CASINOS MUSEUMS 36 18 TRAVEL PLAZAS FOLIAGE SIGHTSEEING 38 20 INFORMATION LISTING STATE PARKS/LAKE ACTIVITIES 40 22 Have big fun in a small town. Visit ChoctawCountry.com EVENTS SEPTEMBER 18 / BUTTERFIELD BIKER BASH OCTOBER 1-2 / ROCK THE EQUINOX The now famous Butterfield Trail was the main route for Calling all metal heads! Rock the Equinox returns to Lake pioneers traveling west to search for gold, adventure and a better John Wells in Stigler this year with a huge lineup of local and life.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlifedepartment.Com BASSMASTER SERIES / ANGLER
    FREE OFFICIAL 2012 OKLAHOMA FISHING REGULATIONS General Information Everything you need to know for fishing in Oklahoma. Black Bass ID 101 Become an expert: learn about largemouth, smallmouth and spotted bass identification, page 10. Weird Fish of Oklahoma See if you can reel in one of these 2./$+20$ unique species, page 22. '(3$5 7 2) :,/' 70(1 ,21 /,)( &216(59$7 wildlifedepartment.com BASSMASTER SERIES / ANGLER CHRISTIANA | BRADLEY PASSIONATE ABOUT POWERSPORTS AND SAVING YOU MONEY. Did you know that when you buy licenses, hunting and fi shing, or fuel up your boat, you’re conserving fi sh and wildlife? GEICO proudly celebrates the 75th Anniversary of the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration programs in 2012, America’s most successful partnership to conserve fi sh and wildlife. Take pride in your nature at www.wsfr75.com. Get a free quote. 1-800-442-9253 Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. Boat and PWC coverages are written through non-affi liated insurance companies and are secured through the GEICO Insurance Agency, Inc. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2012 GEICO PUBLISHED BY THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STATE OF OKLAHOMA Mary Fallin Governor Kristen Gillman WILDLIFE CONSERVATION GENERAL INFORMATION Statewide Daily & Size Limits ......... 10 COMMISSION & REGULATIONS Alligator Gar .....................................13 Black Bass .......................................10 Mike Bloodworth, Hugo Fisheries Contact Information ......... 2 Chairman Catfish ..............................................11 Frequently Asked Questions ..........39 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Fishing Guide Fishing Regulations Guide - Ga Trim:
    FREE!OKLAHOMA FISHING OKLAHOMA 2018–2019 OFFICIAL REGULATION GUIDE DEPAR T OF WILD TMEN ION LIFE CONSERVAT wildlifedepartment.com FLIP OVER for “Oklahoma Hunting” Regulations Guide One bite and you’ll be HOOKED! Enjoy Marshall County! PHOTO COURTESY CABIN FEVER ADVENTURES PHOTO COURTESY ADVANTAGE GUIDE SERVICE PHOTO COURTESY ALBERTA CREEK MARINA PHOTO COURTESY ADVANTAGE GUIDE SERVICE AN AREA FOR ALL SEASONS THAT OFFERS: • Water Recreation • Relaxation • Historical Sites • Unique Shopping • Resorts & Marinas • National Sand Bass Festival • Golf • Lodging • Rodeos • Dining • Striper Fishing • Outstanding Quality of Life 11544 Highway 70 PO Box 542 Madill, OK 73446 LakeTexomaOnline.com/marshall-county-kingston-madill 580-795-2431 www.mccoconline.org PUBLISHED BY THE GENERAL INFORMATION DAY & SIZE LIMITS/ OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT & REGULATIONS FISH SPECIES INFO OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION Licenses .............................................. 2 Statewide Daily & Size Limits ......... 10 General Fishing Regulations ............ 7 Paddlefish Regulations ................... 14 Turtle, Bullfrog Regulations ............. 9 Trout Regulations & Area Maps ..... 16 STATE OF OKLAHOMA State Record Fish ............................ 22 Aquatic Nuisance Species .............. 24 Mary Fallin How To Certify a State Record ...... 23 Governor OLAP Regulations ............................ 26 SPECIAL REGULATIONS Frequently Asked Questions .......... 28 Public Fishing Waters ...................... 30 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION Partners in Conservation .....Appendix COMMISSION
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Ownership and BIA-Administered Tribal
    Richardson Lovewell Washington State County Surface Ownership and BIA- Wildlife Lovewell Fishing Lake And Falls City Reservoir Wildlife Area St. Francis Keith Area Brown State Wildlife Sebelius Lake Norton Phillips Brown State Fishing Lake And Area Cheyenne (Norton Lake) Wildlife Area Smith County Washington Marshall Wildlife Area County Lovewell Nemaha Fishing Lake County State ¤£77 County Wildlife administered Tribal and Allotted 36 Rawlins State Park Fishing Lake Sabetha ¤£ Decatur Norton Area County Republic County Norton County Marysville ¤£75 36 36 Brown County ¤£ £36 County ¤£ Washington Phillipsburg ¤ Jewell County Nemaha County Doniphan County St. Subsurface Minerals Estate £283 County Joseph ¤ Atchison State Kirwin National Glen Elder Jamestown Tuttle Fishing Lake Wildlife Refuge Reservoir Sherman (Waconda Lake) Wildlife Area Creek Atchison State Fishing Webster Lake 83 State Glen Elder Lake And Wildlife Area County ¤£ Sheridan Nicodemus Tuttle Pottawatomie State Thomas County Park Webster Lake Wildlife Area Concordia State National Creek State Fishing Lake No. Atchison Parks 159 BIA-managed tribal and allotted subsurface Fishing Lake Historic Site Rooks County 1 And Wildlife ¤£ Fort Colby Cloud County Atchison Leavenworth Goodland 24 Beloit Clay County Holton 70 ¤£ Sheridan Osborne Riley County §¨¦ 24 County Glen Elder ¤£ Jackson 73 County Graham County Rooks State County ¤£ minerals estate State Park Mitchell Clay Center Pottawatomie County Sherman State Fishing Lake And ¤£59 Leavenworth Wildlife Area County County Fishing
    [Show full text]
  • Status Report: Joint State/Tribal Water Compact and Water Marketing Proposals
    Status Report to the Office of the Governor Joint State/Tribal Water Compact & Water Marketing Proposals Southeast Oklahoma Water Resources Development Plan Oklahoma Water Resources Board March 2002 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................. 2 Solicitation of Water Development Proposals.................................................................. 7 Joint State/Tribal Request for Proposals..................................................................... 7 Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust Proposal.............................................................. 8 North Texas Water Alliance/Agency Proposal............................................................ 10 Development of the Draft State/Tribal Water Compact ................................................. 12 Initial Claim to Water by the Choctaw/Chickasaw Nations ......................................... 12 Initial Discussions with the Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribal Nations ............................ 14 Recent State/Tribal Compact Negotiations—HCR 1066 and HCR 1109........................ 14 Provisions of the Draft State/Tribal Water Compact .................................................. 15 Southeast Oklahoma Water Availability Study............................................................... 20 Kiamichi River Operations ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]