• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Zoosymposia 1: 1–13 (2008) ISSN 1178-9905 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zoosymposia/ ZOOSYMPOSIA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1178-9913 (online edition) New techniques yield new insights on the basic biology of living microgastropods CAROLE S. HICKMAN University of California, Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 VLSB, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Light traps, undisturbed sediment cores and emergence traps were used to pursue new knowledge of the biology of poorly-known microgastropods. These tools were used specifi cally to explore novel habitats, behavior and function. The most interesting discoveries include signifi cant interstitial populations of species previously considered rare, including epipsammic browsers and taxa that emerge from the sediment at night. Diel activity patterns include movement between sediment and water column, movement between sediment and marine plants, vertical migrations on marine plants, and movement between plants and plant epiphytes. Unsuspected behavioral correlates include active swimming and mass spawning aggregations and drifting and fl oating using mucus threads to launch into the water column from marine plants or the sides of aquaria. Ciliary locomotion is a convergent theme in microgastropods, with new examples from vetigastro- pod and neritopsine species that also use mucus threads in drifting. At the sediment-water interface, upside-down ciliary locomotion in the surface tension may be combined with feeding on the rich microbial ecosystem concentrated at the air-water interface. Key Words: light traps, emergence traps, infauna, interstitial fauna, stygofauna, rafting, drifting, diel vertical migrations, epipsammic browsing, ciliary locomotion Introduction “Prosobranch” gastropod diversity is concentrated at small shell and body sizes (< 5 mm) among the so-called microgastropods. Malacological studies have concentrated on conspicuous, large-shelled species that are easily collected. There is a gap in our knowledge of minute and cryptic species, es- pecially those that are invisible in the fi eld and require special collection and recovery techniques. Microgastropods are known primarily from empty shells recovered from beach sand and “shell grit” by collectors who have specialized in the activities of “sorting” and “picking” through bulk samples. In museum collections it is common to fi nd the microgastropods sorted to higher taxonomic levels and placed in drawers at the end of a series of well-curated and well-identifi ed large-shelled species. There is growing recognition that a major component of marine biodiversity is small (< 5 mm). Es- timates of species richness have increased dramatically in studies that have made a special effort to sample micromolluscan diversity (Bouchet et al. 2002). New methods for collecting and sorting in heterogeneous habitats will continue to yield new micromollusc taxa and increase understanding of species richness. Resurgence of interest in obtaining live micromolluscs is driven primarily by systematists working to recover phylogenetic relationships from molecular data or from comparative anatomical data that Accepted by D.L. Geiger: 28 Apr. 2008; published 25 Jul. 2008 1 require more than an empty shell. For anatomical and molecular studies, fi xation and preservation are of immediate concern. Collecting live animals offers another kind of opportunity: fi lling the knowledge gap in the basic biology of behavior, function, and ecology of micromolluscs. This paper emphasizes the challenge of understanding the living organism. Precious opportunity is lost when live animals are placed directly in alcohol for DNA extraction or fi xed and preserved immediately for sectioning and anatomical re- construction. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to outline three methods that have recovered large numbers of live microgastropods, and (2) to demonstrate the fruitfulness of these methods in terms of novel biological phenomena they elucidate. The methods involve devices that are easily constructed and modifi ed and do not require expen- sive and infl exible off-the-shelf technology: light traps and various uses of light to attract animals at night, recovery of undisturbed sediment cores and samples of natural habitat, and emergence traps to recover animals that undergo diel migrations between sediment and water column and sediment and marine plants (Figs 1–3). Examples of phenomena revealed by these techniques include: sustained swimming, mass aggregation, and mass spawning in the waster column; epipsammic browsing on sand grains; and mucous thread launching and upside-down locomotion in surface tension using cili- ary locomotion. Light traps Rationale and Design. Light traps of different designs have been used for many years to attract and capture positively-phototropic aquatic organisms. The major target organisms have been larval and juvenile fi shes in both freshwater (Marchetti et al. 2004) and marine environments (Doherty 1987) and marine zooplankton, especially copepods (Holmes & O’Connor 1988; Holmes 1998) and larval crustaceans (Porter et al. 2008). In order to be caught in a light trap, an organism must have the appro- priate visual photosensitivity and the ability to swim to the trap and enter it. Light trap designs for fi sh larvae are often fairly elaborate: capable of recording depth and controlling angles, wavelength, and intensity of illumination. Battery-powered incandescent bulbs and chemical light sticks are the most common sources of illumination. Comparative studies of light trap designs have shown signifi cant differences and biases in sampling studies (e.g., Kissick 1993; Hernandez & Lindquist 1999; Meekan et al. 2001; Marchetti et al. 2004). Although trap design may bias the size, the age, or the taxa that are captured, the physiological characteristics of the taxa may be equally important. For quantitative studies it is nearly impossible to determine the area that is being sampled (Hernandez & Lindquist 1999). None of these factors is par- ticularly relevant to the potential use of light traps to attract, concentrate, and capture new or poorly known microgastropods. The simplest and least expensive homemade light traps are the best way for malacologists to experiment with the technique. The light trap illustrated here (Fig. 1) is one of fi ve that were constructed and deployed over the course of one tidal cycle to sample larval stomatopods in back-reef habitats on Moorea, French Poly- nesia (S.S. Porter unpubl. data). The trap was designed to hang in the water column immediately be- neath the surface, attached to a cinder block on the bottom. It was lit by a small underwater fl ashlight for several hours shortly after sunset, and designed so that organisms would enter the PVC body of the trap via the wide end of one of four plastic funnels (see Hickman & Porter 2007 for design de- 2 · Zoosymposia 1 © 2008 Magnolia Press HICKMAN tails). Subsequent design experiments have included smaller traps with a single funnel at one end and catchment at the other and lit by Cyalume® “light sticks.” Results. Light traps deployed in a variety of marine environments in Western Australia, Hawaii, and Moorea (French Polynesia) have captured both larval and adult microgastropods and revealed some interesting biological phenomena. The most detailed account to date is of sustained swimming, mass aggregation at light traps, and epidemic spawning in two species of benthic scissurellid gastropods (Hickman & Porter 2007). The thousands of individuals recovered on one night in 2002 demonstrate that these cryptic microgastropods are not rare. An earlier observation of a “struggling mode of lo- Figures 1–3. Basic design of three devices for collecting microgastropods. 1. Light trap (modifi ed from Hick- man & Porter 2007). 2. Emergence trap. 3. Sediment corer. See text for details. BIOLOGY OF LIVING MICROGASTROPODS Zoosymposia 1 © 2008 Magnolia Press · 3 comotion” in a single scissurellid individual led Haszprunar (1988) to conclude that the behavior “cannot be used to traverse large distances.” Hasegawa (2004) reported mass swimming and spawn- ing of scissurellids at an underwater fi shing lure, also indicating a behavioral attraction to light. It is probable that other poorly-known groups of microgastropods that are rare in museum collections are not actually rare in nature and that aggregation can be induced. A second signifi cant microgastropod component in light trap assemblages is larval and early ju- venile neritid gastropods (C.S. Hickman unpubl. data). In Moorea three morphologically distinct neritid larval forms have been recovered from light traps deployed at the surface in shallow water in both back-reef lagoons and at the mouths of estuaries at the heads of two major embayments. The appearance of small numbers of juveniles (< 5 mm) in the traps is more diffi cult to explain given the lack of any structural features to facilitate sustained swimming. However, laboratory observations of mucous thread production, drifting, and upside-down locomotion in surface tension by microneritids (C.S. Hickman unpubl. data) provide a potential explanation for their presence at the surface during the time intervals in which traps were deployed. A morphological feature that scissurellid gastropods and neritid gastropod larvae share with larval fi sh, larval crustaceans, and many other forms in light trap assemblages is disproportionately large eyes (Figs 4–5). This is a convergent feature of organisms that are attracted to

Load more

  14

Copy Link