Sociocultural Data Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Sociocultural Data Report River Grove (Tampa) Population Area: 0.952 square miles Jurisdiction(s): Cities: Tampa Counties:Hillsborough General Population Trends Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Total Population 1,671 1,597 1,967 2,036 Total Households 600 600 771 711 Average Persons 5.77 5.80 6.13 5.23 per Acre Race Average Persons 2.72 2.61 2.67 2.63 per Household Average Persons 3.31 3.28 3.00 3.43 per Family Males 775 713 842 973 Females 896 884 1,125 1,063 Race and Ethnicity Trends Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) White Alone 570 380 404 548 (34.11%) (23.79%) (20.54%) (26.92%) Black or African 1,066 1,105 1,443 1,438 American Alone (63.79%) (69.19%) (73.36%) (70.63%) Native Hawaiian 0 0 0 0 and Other Pacific (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) (0.00%) Minority Percentage Population Islander Alone Asian Alone 8 0 9 20 (0.48%) (0.00%) (0.46%) (0.98%) American Indian 5 4 6 0 or Alaska Native (0.30%) (0.25%) (0.31%) (0.00%) Alone Some Other Race 22 66 56 29 Alone (1.32%) (4.13%) (2.85%) (1.42%) Claimed 2 or NA 43 49 0 More Races (NA) (2.69%) (2.49%) (0.00%) Hispanic or 169 148 333 482 Latino of Any (10.11%) (9.27%) (16.93%) (23.67%) Race Not Hispanic or 1,502 1,449 1,634 1,554 Latino (89.89%) (90.73%) (83.07%) (76.33%) Minority 1,231 1,296 1,762 1,874 (73.67%) (81.15%) (89.58%) (92.04%) Page 1 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Age Trends Population by Age Group Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Under Age 5 6.52% 5.39% 8.19% 8.30% Ages 5-17 20.89% 24.36% 20.39% 19.94% Ages 18-21 6.34% 5.32% 5.95% 9.04% Ages 22-29 9.04% 7.08% 9.56% 11.15% Ages 30-39 13.23% 13.84% 11.90% 13.80% Ages 40-49 15.92% 14.03% 11.64% 8.40% Ages 50-64 16.82% 17.22% 16.98% 14.88% Age 65 and Over 11.25% 12.77% 15.46% 14.44% -Ages 65-74 7.78% 6.01% 8.39% 7.61% -Ages 75-84 2.81% 5.57% 5.69% 5.70% -Age 85 and Over 0.66% 1.13% 1.32% 1.13% Median Age NA 37 33 33 Median Age Comparison Income Trends Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Median $29,271 $29,042 $30,088 $26,657 Household Income Median Family $31,799 $36,079 $38,327 NA Income Population below 12.09% 12.21% 26.28% 31.24% Poverty Level Households 11.50% 11.67% 26.98% 23.63% below Poverty Level Households with 7.00% 5.00% 10.12% 2.39% Public Assistance Income Income Trends Poverty and Public Assistance Disability Trends See the Data Sources section below for an explanation about the differences in disability data among the various years. Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Population 16 To 140 272 64 Years with a (11.41%) (18.00%) (NA) (NA) disability Population 20 To 175 64 Years with a (NA) (NA) (NA) (16.37%) disability Page 2 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Educational Attainment Trends Housing Tenure Age 25 and Over Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Less than 9th 89 77 134 81 Grade (8.79%) (7.74%) (10.62%) (6.66%) 9th to 12th 176 243 222 110 Grade, No (17.37%) (24.42%) (17.59%) (9.05%) Diploma High School 747 674 906 1,026 Graduate or (73.74%) (67.74%) (71.79%) (84.38%) Higher Bachelor's 202 145 193 131 Degree or Higher (19.94%) (14.57%) (15.29%) (10.77%) Language Trends Age 5 and Over Median Housing Value Comparison Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Speaks English 35 46 212 48 Well (2.27%) (3.04%) (11.82%) (2.57%) Speaks English NA 35 150 43 Not Well (NA) (2.32%) (8.37%) (2.30%) Speaks English NA 18 0 70 Not at All (NA) (1.19%) (0.00%) (3.75%) Speaks English 16 53 150 113 Not Well or Not (1.04%) (3.51%) (8.37%) (6.06%) at All Housing Trends Description 1990 2000 2010 2015(ACS) (ACS) Total 661 659 833 759 Occupied Units With No Vehicles Available Units per Acre 1.21 1.24 1.80 1.64 Single-Family 517 557 371 314 Units Multi-Family 69 87 501 415 Units Mobile Home 2 15 0 30 Units Owner-Occupied 469 438 248 209 Units Renter-Occupied 132 162 522 502 Units Vacant Units 60 59 62 48 Median Housing $51,500 $65,500 $137,000 $77,300 Value Occupied 51 60 128 82 Housing Units (8.49%) (10.00%) (16.60%) (11.53%) w/No Vehicle Page 3 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Existing Land Use Land Use Type Acres Percentage Acreage Not Zoned For Agriculture 0 0.00% Agricultural 0 0.00% Centrally Assessed 0 0.00% Industrial 40 6.57% Institutional 4 0.66% Mining 0 0.00% Other 0 0.00% Public/Semi-Public 312 51.22% Recreation 0 0.00% Residential 82 13.46% Retail/Office 2 0.33% Row 0 0.00% Vacant Residential 1 0.16% Vacant Nonresidential 23 3.78% Water 0 0.00% Parcels With No Values 3 0.49% Location Maps Page 4 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Community Facilities The community facilities information below is useful in a variety of ways for environmental evaluations. These community resources should be evaluated for potential sociocultural effects, such as accessibility and relocation potential. The facility types may indicate the types of population groups present in the project study area. Facility staff and leaders can be sources of community information such as who uses the facility and how it is used. Additionally, community facilities are potential public meeting venues. Community Boundaries (User defined) Facility Name River Grove (Tampa) Northeast (Tampa) Old Seminole Heights (Tampa) Temple Crest (Tampa) Woodland Terrace (Tampa) Florida Parks and Recreational Facilities (Points) Facility Name Address Zip Code ROGERS PARK GOLF COURSE 7801 N 30TH ST 33610 BLACKWATER HAMMOCK 8000 N VEVE LN 33610 US Census Places Facility Name Tampa Page 5 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Block Groups The following Census Block Groups were used to calculate demographics for this report. 1990 Census Block Groups 120570017001, 120570105006, 120570011001, 120570010001, 120570010005 2000 Census Block Groups 120570105005, 120570010005, 120570010001, 120570011001 2010 Census Block Groups 120570010021, 120570105013, 120570010011 2015 Census Block Groups 120570010011, 120570105013, 120570010021 Data Sources Area The geographic area of the community based on a user-specified community boundary or area of interest (AOI) boundary. Jurisdiction Jurisdiction(s) includes local government boundaries that intersect the community or AOI boundary. Demographic Data Demographic data reported under the headings General Population Trends, Race and Ethnicity Trends, Age Trends, Income Trends, Educational Attainment Trends, Language Trends, and Housing Trends is from the U.S. Decennial Census (1990, 2000) and the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates from 2006-2010 and 2011-2015. The data was gathered at the block group level for user-specified community boundaries and AOIs, and at the county level for counties. Depending on the dataset, the data represents 100% counts (Census Summary File 1) or sample-based information (Census Summary File 3 or ACS). About the Census Data: User-specified community boundaries and AOIs do not always correspond precisely to block group boundaries. In these instances, adjustment of the geographic area and data for affected block groups is required to estimate the actual population. To improve the accuracy of such estimates in the SDR report, the census block group data was adjusted to exclude all census blocks with a population of two or fewer. These areas were eliminated from the corresponding years' block groups. Next, the portion of the block group that lies outside of the community or AOI boundary was removed. The demographics within each block group were then recalculated, assuming an equal area distribution of the population. Note that there may be areas where there is no population. Use caution when comparing the 100% count data (Decennial Census) to the sample-based data (ACS). In any given year, about one in 40 or 2.5% of U.S. households will receive the ACS questionnaire. Over any five-year period, about one in eight households will receive the questionnaire, as compared to about one in six that received the long form questionnaire for the Decennial Census 2000. (Source: http://mcdc.missouri.edu/pub/data/acs/Readme.shtml)The U.S. Census Bureau provides help with this process: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/guidance_for_data_users/comparing_2015/ Page 6 of 13 Sociocultural Data Report Printed on: 8/06/2017 Use caution when interpreting changes in Race and Ethnicity over time. Starting with the 2000 Decennial Census, respondents were given a new option of selecting one or more race categories. Also in 2000, the placement of the question about Hispanic origin changed, helping to increase responsiveness to the Hispanic-origin question. Because of these and other changes, the 1990 data on race and ethnicity are not directly comparable with data from later censuses. (Source: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-1.pdf; http://www.census.gov/pred/www/rpts/Race%20and%20Ethnicity%20FINAL%20report.pdf) The "Minority" calculations are derived from Census and ACS data using both the race and ethnicity responses.