Genetic Insights Into the Biological Mechanisms Governing Human Ovarian Ageing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genetic Insights Into the Biological Mechanisms Governing Human Ovarian Ageing medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.20248322; this version posted January 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Title: Genetic insights into the biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing Katherine S Ruth*1, Felix R Day*2, Jazib Hussain*3, Ana Martínez-Marchal*4,5, Catherine E Aiken6,7, Ajuna Azad3, Deborah J Thompson8, Hironori Abe9, Jane L Tarry-Adkins6,7, Javier Martin Gonzalez10, Annique Claringbould11, Olivier B Bakker12, Patrick Sulem13, Sandra Turon14, N Charlotte Onland-Moret15, Emil Peter Trane Hertz3,16, Pascal N Timshel17,18, Vallari Shukla3, Rehannah Borup3, Kristina W Olsen19,3, Mònica Ferrer-Roda4,5, Yan Huang4,5, Stasa Stankovic2, Paul RHJ Timmers20,21, Thomas U Ahearn22, Behrooz Z Alizadeh23, Elnaz Naderi23, Irene L Andrulis24,25, Alice M Arnold26,27, Kristan J Aronson28, Annelie Augustinsson29, Stefania Bandinelli30, Caterina M Barbieri31, Robin N Beaumont1, Heiko Becher32, Matthias W Beckmann33, Stefania Benonisdottir13, Sven Bergmann34,35, Murielle Bochud36, Eric Boerwinkle37, Stig E Bojesen38,39,40, Manjeet K Bolla41, Dorret I Boomsma42, Nicholas Bowker2, Jennifer A Brody43, Linda Broer44, Julie E Buring45,46, Archie Campbell47, Harry Campbell20, Jose E Castelao48, Eulalia Catamo49, Stephen J Chanock22, Georgia Chenevix-Trench50, Marina Ciullo51,52, Tanguy Corre36,34,35, Fergus J Couch53, Angela Cox54, Simon S Cross55, Francesco Cucca56,57, Kamila Czene58, George Davey-Smith59,60, Eco JCN de Geus42,61, Renée de Mutsert62, Immaculata De Vivo63,64, Ellen W Demerath65, Joe Dennis41, Alison M Dunning8, Miriam Dwek66, Mikael Eriksson67, Tõnu Esko68,69, Peter A Fasching70,33, Jessica D Faul71, Luigi Ferrucci72, Nora Franceschini73, Timothy M Frayling1, Manuela Gago-Dominguez74,75, Massimo Mezzavilla76, Montserrat García-Closas22, Christian Gieger77,78,79, Graham G Giles80,81,82, Harald Grallert77,78,79, Daniel F Gudbjartsson13, Vilmundur Gudnason83,84, Pascal Guénel85, Christopher A Haiman86, Niclas Håkansson87, Per Hall58, Caroline Hayward88, Chunyan He89,90, Wei He67, Gerardo Heiss73, Miya K Høffding3, John L Hopper81, Jouke J Hottenga42, Frank Hu91,64,63, David Hunter92,64,93, Mohammad A Ikram94, Rebecca D Jackson95, Micaella DR Joaquim1, Esther M John96,97, Peter K Joshi20, David Karasik98,46, Sharon LR Kardia99, Robert Karlsson100, Cari M Kitahara101, Ivana Kolcic102, Charles Kooperberg103, Peter Kraft63,104, Allison W Kurian97,96, Zoltan Kutalik36,35, Martina La Bianca49, Genevieve LaChance105, Claudia Langenberg2, Lenore J Launer106, Joop SE Laven107, Deborah A Lawlor59,60, Loic Le Marchand108, Jingmei Li58, Annika Lindblom109,110, Sara Lindstrom111, Tricia Lindstrom112, Martha Linet101, YongMei Liu113, Simin Liu114, Jian'an Luan2, Reedik Mägi69, Patrik KE Magnusson100, Massimo Mangino105,115, Arto Mannermaa116,117,118, Brumat Marco76, Jonathan Marten88, Nicholas G Martin119, Hamdi Mbarek42, Barbara McKnight27, Sarah E Medland119, Christa Meisinger78,120, Thomas Meitinger121, Cristina Menni105, Andres Metspalu69, Lili Milani69, Roger L Milne80,81,82, Grant W Montgomery122, Dennis O Mook-Kanamori62,123, Antonella Mulas56, Anna M Mulligan124,125, Alison Murray126, Mike A Nalls127, Anne Newman128, Raymond Noordam129, Teresa Nutile51, Dale R Nyholt130, Andrew F Olshan131, Håkan Olsson29, Jodie N Painter119, Alpa V Patel132, Nancy L Pedersen100, Natalia Perjakova69, Annette Peters78,79, Ulrike Peters103, Paul DP Pharoah8,41, Ozren Polasek133, Eleonora Porcu56, Bruce M Psaty43, Iffat Rahman134, Gad Rennert135, Hedy S Rennert135, Paul M Ridker45,46, Susan M Ring59,60, Antonietta Robino49, Lynda M Rose45, Frits R Rosendaal62, Jacques Rossouw136, Igor Rudan20, Rico Rueedi34,35, Daniela Ruggiero51,52, Cinzia F Sala31, Emmanouil Saloustros137, Dale P Sandler138, Serena Sanna56, Elinor J Sawyer139, Chloé Sarnowski140, David Schlessinger141, Marjanka K Schmidt142,143, Minouk J Schoemaker144, Katharina E Schraut145,20, Christopher Scott112, Saleh Shekari1, Amruta Shrikhande3, Albert V Smith83,84, Blair H Smith146, Jennifer A Smith99, Rossella Sorice51, Melissa C Southey82,147,80, Tim D Spector105, John J Spinelli148,149, Meir Stampfer63,64,91, Doris Stöckl78,150, Joyce BJ van Meurs44, Konstantin Strauch151,152, Unnur Styrkarsdottir13, Anthony J Swerdlow144,153, Toshiko Tanaka72, Lauren R Teras132, Alexander Teumer154, Unnur Þorsteinsdottir13,155, Nicholas J Timpson59,60, Daniela Toniolo31, Michela Traglia31, Melissa A Troester131, Thérèse Truong85, Jessica Tyrrell1, André G Uitterlinden44,94, Sheila Ulivi49, Celine M Vachon156, Veronique Vitart88, Uwe Völker157, Peter Vollenweider158, Henry Völzke154, Qin Wang41, Nicholas J Wareham2, Clarice R Weinberg159, David R Weir71, Amber N Wilcox22, Ko 1 NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.20248322; this version posted January 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Willems van Dijk160,161,162, Gonneke Willemsen42, James F Wilson20,21, Bruce HR Wolffenbuttel163, Alicja Wolk87,164, Andrew R Wood1, Wei Zhao99, Marek Zygmunt165, Biobank- based Integrative Omics Study (BIOS) Consortium, eQTLGen Consortium, kConFab Investigators, The LifeLines Cohort Study,, The InterAct consortium, Lude Franke12,170, Stephen Burgess171,172, Patrick Deelen173,12, Tune H Pers17,18, Marie Louise Grøndahl19, Claus Yding Andersen174, Anna Pujol14, Andres J Lopez-Contreras3, Jeremy A Daniel16, Kari Stefansson13,155, Jenny Chang-Claude175,176, Yvonne T van der Schouw15, Kathyrn L Lunetta140,177, Daniel I Chasman45,46, Douglas F Easton8,41, Jenny A Visser44, Susan E Ozanne6, Satoshi H Namekawa9, Joanne M Murabito178,177, Ken K Ong2,179, Eva R Hoffmann*3, Anna Murray*1, Ignasi Roig*4,5, John RB Perry*2,44 * Denotes equal contribution Correspondence to Eva R Hoffmann ([email protected]), Anna Murray ([email protected]), Ignasi Roig ([email protected]) and John R B Perry ([email protected]). Author membership for listed consortia appear in the Supplementary Information. Affiliations 1 Genetics of Human Complex Traits, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K, 2MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK, 3DNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Genome Integrity and Instability Group, Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain., 5Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain, 6University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom, 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Box 223, The Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0SW, UK, 8Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK., 9Division of Reproductive Sciences, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, USA, 10Transgenic Core Facility, Department of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11Structural and Computational Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany, 12University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen, The Netherlands, 13deCODE genetics/Amgen, Reykjavik, Iceland, 14Transgenic Animal Unit, Center of Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain., 15Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands., 16The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 17The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, København Ø, Denmark., 18Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, København S, Denmark, 19Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Denmark, 20Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK, 21MRC 2 medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.11.20248322; this version posted January 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, 22Division of Cancer
Recommended publications
  • Diagnostic Evaluation of the Infertile Female: a Committee Opinion
    Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama Diagnostic evaluation for infertility in women should be conducted in a systematic, expeditious, and cost-effective manner to identify all relevant factors with initial emphasis on the least invasive methods for detection of the most common causes of infertility. The purpose of this committee opinion is to provide a critical review of the current methods and procedures for the evaluation of the infertile female, and it replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;98:302–7). (Fertil SterilÒ 2015;103:e44–50. Ó2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) Key Words: Infertility, oocyte, ovarian reserve, unexplained, conception Use your smartphone to scan this QR code Earn online CME credit related to this document at www.asrm.org/elearn and connect to the discussion forum for Discuss: You can discuss this article with its authors and with other ASRM members at http:// this article now.* fertstertforum.com/asrmpraccom-diagnostic-evaluation-infertile-female/ * Download a free QR code scanner by searching for “QR scanner” in your smartphone’s app store or app marketplace. diagnostic evaluation for infer- of the male partner are described in a Pregnancy history (gravidity, parity, tility is indicated for women separate document (5). Women who pregnancy outcome, and associated A who fail to achieve a successful are planning to attempt pregnancy via complications) pregnancy after 12 months or more of insemination with sperm from a known Previous methods of contraception regular unprotected intercourse (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing the Ovarian Reserve in Mice by Evading LINE-1 Genotoxicity
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14055-8 OPEN Maximizing the ovarian reserve in mice by evading LINE-1 genotoxicity Marla E. Tharp1,2,Safia Malki1 & Alex Bortvin 1* Female reproductive success critically depends on the size and quality of a finite ovarian reserve. Paradoxically, mammals eliminate up to 80% of the initial oocyte pool through the enigmatic process of fetal oocyte attrition (FOA). Here, we interrogate the striking correlation 1234567890():,; of FOA with retrotransposon LINE-1 (L1) expression in mice to understand how L1 activity influences FOA and its biological relevance. We report that L1 activity triggers FOA through DNA damage-driven apoptosis and the complement system of immunity. We demonstrate this by combined inhibition of L1 reverse transcriptase activity and the Chk2-dependent DNA damage checkpoint to prevent FOA. Remarkably, reverse transcriptase inhibitor AZT-treated Chk2 mutant oocytes that evade FOA initially accumulate, but subsequently resolve, L1-instigated genotoxic threats independent of piRNAs and differentiate, resulting in an increased functional ovarian reserve. We conclude that FOA serves as quality control for oocyte genome integrity, and is not obligatory for oogenesis nor fertility. 1 Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. 2 Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. *email: [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2020) 11:330 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14055-8 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14055-8 ogenesis programs across metazoans reflect diverse suggested the involvement of an additional mechanism(s) in Oreproductive strategies observed in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Age and Fertility: a Guide for Patients
    Age and Fertility A Guide for Patients PATIENT INFORMATION SERIES Published by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine under the direction of the Patient Education Committee and the Publications Committee. No portion herein may be reproduced in any form without written permission. This booklet is in no way intended to replace, dictate or fully define evaluation and treatment by a qualified physician. It is intended solely as an aid for patients seeking general information on issues in reproductive medicine. Copyright © 2012 by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE Age and Fertility A Guide for Patients Revised 2012 A glossary of italicized words is located at the end of this booklet. INTRODUCTION Fertility changes with age. Both males and females become fertile in their teens following puberty. For girls, the beginning of their reproductive years is marked by the onset of ovulation and menstruation. It is commonly understood that after menopause women are no longer able to become pregnant. Generally, reproductive potential decreases as women get older, and fertility can be expected to end 5 to 10 years before menopause. In today’s society, age-related infertility is becoming more common because, for a variety of reasons, many women wait until their 30s to begin their families. Even though women today are healthier and taking better care of themselves than ever before, improved health in later life does not offset the natural age-related decline in fertility. It is important to understand that fertility declines as a woman ages due to the normal age- related decrease in the number of eggs that remain in her ovaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence and Clinical Associations with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency, Early Menopause, and Low Ovarian Reserve in Systemic Sclerosis
    Clinical Rheumatology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05522-5 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prevalence and clinical associations with premature ovarian insufficiency, early menopause, and low ovarian reserve in systemic sclerosis Arporn Jutiviboonsuk1 & Lingling Salang2 & Nuntasiri Eamudomkarn2 & Ajanee Mahakkanukrauh1 & Siraphop Suwannaroj1 & Chingching Foocharoen1 Received: 9 October 2020 /Revised: 5 November 2020 /Accepted: 23 November 2020 # International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2020 Abstract The low prevalence of pregnancy in women with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is due to multi-factorial causes, including premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). The study aimed to determine the prevalence of POI, early menopausal status, and any clinical associations of these among Thai female SSc patients. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among female SSc patients between 18 and 45 years of age. The eligible patients underwent blood testing for follicle stimulating hormone and anti- mullerian hormone levels, gynecologic examination, and transvaginal ultrasound for antral follicle count. We excluded patients having surgical amenorrhea, previous radiation, and history of hormonal contraception < 12 weeks and pregnancy. A total of 31 patients were included. The majority (67.7%) had diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Three patients were POI with a preva- lence of 9.7%. The factors associated with POI were a high cumulative dose of cyclophosphamide (CYC) (p =0.02)andthelong duration of CYC used (p = 0.02). After excluding POI, early menopause was detected in 10 patients with a prevalence of 35.7%. The factors associated with early menopause were long disease duration (p = 0.02), high cumulative dose of CYC (p =0.03),and high cumulative dose of prednisolone (p = 0.02).
    [Show full text]
  • Ovarian Reserve (Predicting Fertility Potential in Women)
    Contact: (214) 827-8777 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ovarian Reserve (Predicting Fertility Potential in Women) Ovarian reserve is a woman’s fertility potential. With age, the ability to get pregnant reduces due to a decrease in the number and quality of eggs, and the presence of chromosomal abnormalities in the eggs. Generally, a woman can begin to face difficulty in conceiving by the age of 36 years or older; however, this age can vary among individuals. An individual’s ovarian reserve and ability to conceive can be evaluated through several tests. Ovarian reserve is commonly assessed by measuring the levels of different hormones in the blood. • Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH): FSH levels in the blood are measured at the beginning of the menstrual cycle (day 1 to 5, usually on day 3). The level of this hormone show how the ovaries and the pituitary gland are working together. Generally, FSH levels are low at the beginning of menstruation and then rises to initiate the growth of a follicle and maturing of an egg. • Estradiol hormone: Estradiol levels in the blood are also measured at the start of the menstrual cycle (day 1 to 5, usually on day 3). Similar to FSH, the level of estradiol hormones also shows how the ovaries and the pituitary gland are working. High FSH and/estradiol levels generally indicate a lower chance of conceiving by ovulation induction or IVF. • Antimullerian hormone (AMH): AMH is excreted by follicles and indicates the number of eggs available at the time of the blood test. The test for AMH can be performed anytime during the cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Crosstalk Between PTEN/PI3K/Akt Signalling and DNA Damage in the Oocyte: Implications for Primordial Follicle Activation, Oocyte Quality and Ageing
    cells Review Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt Signalling and DNA Damage in the Oocyte: Implications for Primordial Follicle Activation, Oocyte Quality and Ageing Mila Maidarti 1,2,3, Richard A. Anderson 1 and Evelyn E. Telfer 2,* 1 MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (R.A.A.) 2 Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK 3 Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)131-650-5393 Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 13 January 2020; Published: 14 January 2020 Abstract: The preservation of genome integrity in the mammalian female germline from primordial follicle arrest to activation of growth to oocyte maturation is fundamental to ensure reproductive success. As oocytes are formed before birth and may remain dormant for many years, it is essential that defence mechanisms are monitored and well maintained. The phosphatase and tensin homolog of chromosome 10 (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB, Akt) is a major signalling pathway governing primordial follicle recruitment and growth. This pathway also contributes to cell growth, survival and metabolism, and to the maintenance of genomic integrity. Accelerated primordial follicle activation through this pathway may result in a compromised DNA damage response (DDR). Additionally, the distinct DDR mechanisms in oocytes may become less efficient with ageing. This review considers DNA damage surveillance mechanisms and their links to the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway, impacting on the DDR during growth activation of primordial follicles, and in ovarian ageing.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing and Interpreting Measures of Ovarian Reserve: a Committee Opinion
    ASRM PAGES Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama Ovarian reserve is defined as the number of oocytes remaining in the ovary, or oocyte quantity (oocyte number). Markers of ovarian reserve include hormone levels and sonographically measured features of the ovaries. These markers can be useful as predictors of oocyte yield following controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. However, they are poor predictors of reproductive potential independently from age. This document replaces the document of the same name last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;98:1407–15). (Fertil SterilÒ 2020;114:1151–7. Ó2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo. Discuss: You can discuss this article with its authors and other readers at https://www.fertstertdialog.com/posts/31403 he process of reproductive aging oocyte quality, which relates to the Inhibin B and AMH are glycopro- has traditionally centered on the potential of a fertilized oocyte to result tein hormones produced by small T principle that human oocytes in a live-born infant. Female infants are ovarian follicles and are therefore peak in number during fetal life, un- born with 500,000 to 1 million oo- direct measures of the follicular pool. dergo ovulation or atresia thereafter, cytes, follicular atresia and ovulation Whereas AMH is primarily secreted by and do not regenerate. Reproductive result in a slow depletion of oocyte primary, preantral, and early antral fol- and ovarian senescence occurs with number over time, and menopause sub- licles, inhibin B is secreted primarily by depletion of the number of oocytes, or sequently ensues.
    [Show full text]
  • Antioxidant Intervention Attenuates Aging-Related Changes in the Murine Ovary and Oocyte
    life Article Antioxidant Intervention Attenuates Aging-Related Changes in the Murine Ovary and Oocyte Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe * , Sydney L. Lane , Jason C. Parks, Blair R. McCallie, Rachel Makloski and William B. Schoolcraft Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, CO 80124, USA; [email protected] (S.L.L.); [email protected] (J.C.P.); [email protected] (B.R.M.); [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (W.B.S.) * Correspondence: MKatz-Jaff[email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-788-8300 Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 20 October 2020; Published: 22 October 2020 Abstract: Advanced maternal age (AMA) is associated with reduced fertility due in part to diminished ovarian follicle quantity, inferior oocyte quality, chromosome aneuploidy, and lower implantation rates. Ovarian aging is accompanied by increased oxidative stress and blunted antioxidant signaling, such that antioxidant intervention could improve reproductive potential. The first aim of this study was to determine the molecular effects of antioxidant intervention in the ovaries and oocytes of aged mice, utilizing a supplement containing only naturally occurring açaí (Euterpe oleracea) with an oxygen radical absorbance capacity of 208,628 µmol Trolox equivalent (TE)/100 g indicating high antioxidant activity. Nine month old female CF-1 mice were administered 80 mg/day antioxidants (n = 12) or standard diet (n = 12) for 12 weeks. In the ovary, antioxidant treatment upregulated β-adrenergic signaling, downregulated apoptosis and proinflammatory signaling, and variably affected cell growth and antioxidant pathways (p < 0.05). Exogenous antioxidants also increased the oocyte expression of antioxidant genes GPX1, SOD2, and GSR (p < 0.05). A feasibility analysis was then conducted on female AMA infertility patients as a proof-of-principle investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No Neo-Oogenesis in the Adult Mammalian Ovary Erişkin Memeli Overde Neo-Oogenezi Yoktur
    270 Opinion There is no neo-oogenesis in the adult mammalian ovary Erişkin memeli overde neo-oogenezi yoktur Alain Gougeon1, Elena Notarianni2 1Inserm U1052, ANIPATH U.F.R. de médecine Lyon, Lyon, France 2Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK Introduction oocyte, whereas degenerated and fragmented oocytes were only observed in atretic follicles at a late stage of atresia and In 2004 and 2005, Johnson et al. published two very pro- which were previously antral follicles. Thus, it emerges that vocative studies (1, 2), in which they claimed that in the Johnson et al. (1), misattributed as atretic immature follicles adult mouse ovary, neo-oogenesis takes place and originates those 200 to 400 atretic follicles that were already present at either from the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) (1) or from least 8 days earlier, as shown by their BrdU labeling. How can the bone marrow (BM) via circulating blood cells (2). These we explain such a misinterpretation? Returning to the criteria studies were provocative since they challenged the long-held used to categorize atresia above, whereas condensation of view that mammals are born with a finite number of eggs that oocytes (Figure 1) constitutes the normal fate of atretic rest- declines with ageing. Consequently, an intensive discussion ing follicles, and oocyte degeneration the normal fate of early has developed among experts in the field, some of whom are growing follicles, fragmented oocytes are only seen in antral proponents of neo-oogenesis, while others are opponents follicles at a late stage of atresia (Figure 2). When antral fol- licles undergo atresia, they progressively lose their antrum (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ovarian Reserve in Infertile Patients
    REVIEW ARTICLE Assessment of Ovarian Reserve in Infertile Patients *P Begum1, DR Shaha2, Mahbuba3, L Sanjowal4, R Barua5, KM Hassan6 ABSTRACT Reduced ovarian reserve is a condition characterized by a reduced competence of the ovary to produce oocyte due to advanced age or congenital, medical surgical and idiopathic causes. Age is considered to be the principal factor in determining the reduction of ovarian reserve, especially in woman over 40 years of age, but it's well known that a premature reduction of ovarian reserve can also occur in young patients. Management of patients with diminished ovarian reserve is challenging for fertility experts and frequently the only option to conceive is represented by assisted reproduction technologies. Here we reviewed the aetiology, presentation and diagnosis of reduced ovarian reserve in advanced and young aged women and recent advances in the management of infertility in these women. Key Words: Reduced ovarian reserve; Diminished ovarian reserve; Premature ovarian failure Introduction The reduced ovarian reserve is a condition of by the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study show that reduced ability of the ovary to produce oocytes due the 6.3% of women who received cure for cancer to advanced age or congenital, medical, surgical and suffered of acute ovarian failure9. In this manuscript idiopathic causes. This condition, also known as we reviewed the aetiology, presentation and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) is often used to diagnosis of reduced ovarian reserve in advanced and characterize women at risk for poor performance young aged women and recent advances in the with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) due to management of infertility in these women.
    [Show full text]
  • AMH/MIS As a Contraceptive That Protects the Ovarian Reserve During
    AMH/MIS as a contraceptive that protects the ovarian PNAS PLUS reserve during chemotherapy Motohiro Kanoa,b, Amanda E. Sosulskia,b, LiHua Zhanga,b, Hatice D. Saatcioglua,b, Dan Wangc, Nicholas Nagykerya,b, Mary E. Sabatinid, Guangping Gaoc, Patricia K. Donahoea,b,1, and David Pépina,b,1 aPediatric Surgical Research Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; bDepartment of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; cHorae Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655; and dDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 Contributed by Patricia K. Donahoe, December 29, 2016 (sent for review December 16, 2016; reviewed by Richard N. Freiman, Bruce D. Murphy, and Teresa K. Woodruff) The ovarian reserve represents the stock of quiescent primordial they are selected for activation. However, some studies suggest follicles in the ovary which is gradually depleted during a woman’s MIS may be an important gatekeeper of their recruitment. The reproductive lifespan, resulting in menopause. Müllerian inhibiting default state of primordial follicles is skewed toward activation, substance (MIS) (or anti-Müllerian hormone/AMH), which is pro- as evidenced by both transgenic mouse models and in vitro duced by granulosa cells of growing follicles, has been proposed as ovarian culture experiments. Although MIS-knockout females a negative regulator of primordial follicle activation. Here we show were initially fertile (8), young mice were found to contain more that long-term parenteral administration of superphysiological doses preantral and small antral follicles, and the window of fertility of MIS, using either an adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) was shortened.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of Ovarian Aging
    162 2 REPRODUCTIONREVIEW Mechanisms of ovarian aging Selena U Park1,3, Leann Walsh1 and Karen M Berkowitz 1,2 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA and 3Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA Correspondence should be addressed to K M Berkowitz; Email: [email protected] Abstract Ovarian aging in women correlates with the progressive loss of both the number and quality of oocytes. When these processes occur early or are accelerated, their clinical correlates are diminished ovarian reserve and/or premature ovarian insufficiency. Both these conditions have important consequences for the reproductive and general health of women, including infertility. Although there are many contributing factors, the molecular mechanisms underlying many of the processes associated with ovarian aging have not been fully elucidated. In this review, we highlight some of the most critical factors that impact oocyte quantity and quality with advancing age. We discuss chromosomal factors including cohesion deterioration and mis-segregation, errors in meiotic recombination, and decreased stringency of the spindle assembly checkpoint. DNA damage, telomere changes, reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial dysfunction as they relate to ovarian aging, and well-known gene mutations associated with primary ovarian insufficiency and diminished ovarian reserve are also discussed. Additionally, studies investigating recently acknowledged cytoplasmic factors associated with ovarian aging including protein metabolic dysregulation and microenvironmental alterations in the ovary are presented. We use both mouse and human studies to support the roles these factors play in physiologic and expedited ovarian aging, and we propose directions for future studies.
    [Show full text]