DOCSLIB.ORG

Dimethyl Sulfate Interim AEGL Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dimethyl Sulfate Interim AEGL Document Interim 1:11/2006 INTERIM ACUTE EXPOSURE GUIDELINE LEVELS (AEGLs) DIMETHYL SULFATE (CAS Reg. No. 77-78-1) for NAS/COT-Subcommittee on AEGLs November, 2006 DIMETHYL SULFATE (CAS Reg. No. 77-78-1) CH3 O O S O H3C O INTERIM ACUTE EXPOSURE GUIDELINE LEVELS (AEGLs) Dimethyl Sulfate Interim 1: 11/2006 PREFACE Under the authority of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) P. L. 92-463 of 1972, the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances (NAC/AEGL Committee) has been established to identify, review and interpret relevant toxicologic and other scientific data and develop AEGLs for high priority, acutely toxic chemicals. AEGLs represent threshold exposure limits for the general public and are applicable to emergency exposure periods ranging from 10 minutes to 8 hours. Three levels C AEGL-1, AEGL-2 and AEGL-3 C are developed for each of five exposure periods (10 and 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, and 8 hours) and are distinguished by varying degrees of severity of toxic effects. The three AEGLs are defined as follows: AEGL-1 is the airborne concentration (expressed as parts per million or milligrams per cubic meter [ppm or mg/m3]) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic, non-sensory effects. However, the effects are not disabling and are transient and reversible upon cessation of exposure. AEGL-2 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m3) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape. AEGL-3 is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mg/m3) of a substance above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience life-threatening health effects or death. Airborne concentrations below the AEGL-1 represent exposure levels that could produce mild and progressively increasing but transient and nondisabling odor, taste, and sensory irritation or certain asymptomatic, non-sensory effects. With increasing airborne concentrations above each AEGL, there is a progressive increase in the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of effects described for each corresponding AEGL. Although the AEGL values represent threshold levels for the general public, including susceptible subpopulations, such as infants, children, the elderly, persons with asthma, and those with other illnesses, it is recognized that individuals, subject to unique or idiosyncratic responses, could experience the effects described at concentrations below the corresponding AEGL. i Dimethyl Sulfate Interim 1: 11/2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................v 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 2. HUMAN TOXICITY DATA ...............................................3 2.1. Acute Lethality ......................................................3 2.1.1 Case Reports .................................................3 2.2. Nonlethal Toxicity ....................................................4 2.2.1. Case Reports .................................................4 2.2.2. Epidemiologic Studies .........................................8 2.3. Carcinogenicity ......................................................8 2.4. Summary ...........................................................8 3. ANIMAL TOXICITY DATA .............................................11 3.1. Acute Lethality .....................................................11 3.1.1. Non-human Primates ..........................................11 3.1.2. Dogs ......................................................11 3.1.3. Cats .......................................................11 3.1.4. Rats .......................................................12 3.1.5. Mice .......................................................13 3.1.6. Hamsters ...................................................14 3.1.7. Guinea Pigs .................................................15 3.1.8. Rabbits .....................................................16 3.2. Nonlethal Toxicity ...................................................20 3.2.1. Nonhuman Primates ..........................................20 3.2.2. Cats .......................................................20 3.2.3. Rats .......................................................20 3.2.4. Guinea Pigs .................................................22 3.2.5. Rabbits .....................................................22 3.3. Toxicity after Repeated Exposure .......................................24 3.4. Developmental/Reproductive Toxicity ...................................26 3.5. Sensitization .......................................................27 3.6. Methylating Properties and Mutagenicity .................................27 3.7. Carcinogenicity .....................................................29 3.8. Summary ..........................................................31 4. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS ...........................................33 4.1. Metabolism and Disposition ...........................................33 4.2. Mechanism of Toxicity ...............................................35 4.3. Other Relevant Information ............................................36 4.3.1. Species Variability ...........................................37 4.3.2. Susceptible Populations .......................................37 4.3.3. Concentration-Exposure Duration Relationship .....................38 ii Dimethyl Sulfate Interim 1: 11/2006 5. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-1 ..........................................39 5.1. Summary of Human Data Relevant to AEGL-1 ............................39 5.2. Summary of Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-1 ............................39 5.3. Derivation of AEGL-1 ................................................39 6. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-2 ..........................................41 6.1. Summary of Human Data Relevant to AEGL-2 ............................41 6.2. Summary of Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-2 ............................41 6.3. Derivation of AEGL-2 ................................................42 7. DATA ANALYSIS FOR AEGL-3 ..........................................44 7.1. Summary of Human Data Relevant to AEGL-3 ............................44 7.2. Summary of Animal Data Relevant to AEGL-3 ............................44 7.3. Derivation of AEGL-3 ................................................44 8. SUMMARY OF AEGLS .................................................46 8.1. AEGL Values and Toxicity Endpoints ...................................46 8.2. Comparison with Other Standards and Guidelines ..........................47 9. REFERENCES .........................................................51 APPENDIX A: Derivation of AEGL Values.......................................56 APPENDIX B: Carcinogenicity Assessment .......................................60 APPENDIX C: Derivation Summary for Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Dimethyl Sulfate ............................................................................64 iii Dimethyl Sulfate Interim 1: 11/2006 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Chemical and Physical Properties........................................1 TABLE 2. Criteria for Grading the Degree of Dimethyl Sulfate Intoxication by Wang et al. 1988 ...................................................................9 TABLE 3. Summary of Acute Lethal Inhalation Data in Laboratory Animals..............16 TABLE 4. Summary of Nonlethal Inhalation Data in Laboratory Animals................23 TABLE 5. Summary of Mutagenicity Test Results...................................29 TABLE 6. Tumor Incidences in Rats/Mice/Hamsters (Schlögel 1972) ...................30 TABLE 7. Characterization of Local and Systemic Effects of Dimethyl Sulfate............35 TABLE 8. AEGL-1 Values for Dimethyl Sulfate....................................40 TABLE 9. AEGL-2 Values for Dimethyl Sulfate....................................43 TABLE 10. AEGL-3 Values for Dimethyl Sulfate ...................................45 TABLE 11. Summary of AEGL Values ...........................................46 TABLE 12. Existent Standards and Guidelines for Dimethyl Sulfate ....................48 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Main Pathways for the Methylation of Dimethyl Sulfate ......................34 Figure 2: Category Plot of Toxicity Data compared to AEGL Values....................47 iv Dimethyl Sulfate Interim 1: 11/2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dimethyl sulfate (DMSO4) is a colorless, oily liquid with a slight onion-like odor. A minimum odor threshold may not be derived. Dimethyl sulfate is miscible with organic solvents, and moderately soluble in water. It hydrolyzes readily in contact with water or moist surfaces to form monomethyl sulfate and methanol, and further to form sulfuric acid. Dimethyl sulfate is used as an alkylating agent in the dye, agricultural, pharmaceutical, surfactant, and perfumery industries and exposure results exclusively from industrial processes, mostly via inhalation pathway. Inhalation exposure to dimethyl sulfate results in irritation and other adverse effects of upper respiratory tract and eyes as primary effects, followed by lesions in bronchi and lung. Usually a latency period for local effects of 4 to 12 hours between exposure and onset of effects was reported from human case
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NIOSH Skin Notation Profiles Dimethyl Sulfate (DMS)
    NIOSH Skin Notation Profiles Dimethyl Sulfate (DMS) IDSK [SK] SYS SYS (FATAL) DIR DIR (IRR) DIR (COR) SEN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SKNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health This page intentionally left blank. NIOSH Skin Notation (SK) Profile Dimethyl Sulfate (DMS) [CAS No. 77-78-1] Naomi L. Hudson and G. Scott Dotson DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health This document is in the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Insti- tute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to websites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their pro- grams or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. Ordering Information To receive this document or information about other occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH: Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) TTY: 1-888-232-6348 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH website: www.cdc.gov/niosh For a monthly update on news at NIOSH, subscribe to NIOSH eNews by visiting www.cdc.gov/niosh/eNews. Suggested Citation NIOSH [2017]. NIOSH skin notation profile: Dimethyl sulfate. By Hudson NL, Dotson GS. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publi- cation No. 2017-189.
    [Show full text]
  • A Convenient and Safe O-Methylation of Flavonoids with Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC)
    Molecules 2011, 16, 1418-1425; doi:10.3390/molecules16021418 OPEN ACCESS molecules ISSN 1420-3049 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Article A Convenient and Safe O-Methylation of Flavonoids with Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Roberta Bernini *, Fernanda Crisante and Maria Cristina Ginnasi Dipartimento di Agrobiologia e Agrochimica, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Via S. Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 16 November 2010; in revised form: 23 January 2011 / Accepted: 27 January 2011 / Published: 9 February 2011 Abstract: Dietary flavonoids exhibit beneficial health effects. Several epidemiological studies have focused on their biological activities, including antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular properties. More recently, these compounds have shown to be promising cancer chemopreventive agents in cell culture studies. In particular, O-methylated flavonoids exhibited a superior anticancer activity than the corresponding hydroxylated derivatives being more resistant to the hepatic metabolism and showing a higher intestinal absorption. In this communication we describe a convenient and efficient procedure in order to prepare a large panel of mono- and dimethylated flavonoids by using dimethyl carbonate (DMC), an ecofriendly and non toxic chemical, which plays the role of both solvent and reagent. In order to promote the methylation reaction under mild and practical conditions, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7- ene (DBU) was added in the solution; methylated flavonoids were isolated in high yields and with a high degree of purity. This methylation protocol avoids the use of hazardous and high toxic reagents (diazomethane, dimethyl sulfate, methyl iodide). Keywords: methylated flavonoids; ecofriendly methylation reaction; dimethyl carbonate (DMC); green chemistry 1.
    [Show full text]
  • TOXICOLOGY and EXPOSURE GUIDELINES ______(For Assistance, Please Contact EHS at (402) 472-4925, Or Visit Our Web Site At
    (Revised 1/03) TOXICOLOGY AND EXPOSURE GUIDELINES ______________________________________________________________________ (For assistance, please contact EHS at (402) 472-4925, or visit our web site at http://ehs.unl.edu/) "All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy." This early observation concerning the toxicity of chemicals was made by Paracelsus (1493- 1541). The classic connotation of toxicology was "the science of poisons." Since that time, the science has expanded to encompass several disciplines. Toxicology is the study of the interaction between chemical agents and biological systems. While the subject of toxicology is quite complex, it is necessary to understand the basic concepts in order to make logical decisions concerning the protection of personnel from toxic injuries. Toxicity can be defined as the relative ability of a substance to cause adverse effects in living organisms. This "relative ability is dependent upon several conditions. As Paracelsus suggests, the quantity or the dose of the substance determines whether the effects of the chemical are toxic, nontoxic or beneficial. In addition to dose, other factors may also influence the toxicity of the compound such as the route of entry, duration and frequency of exposure, variations between different species (interspecies) and variations among members of the same species (intraspecies). To apply these principles to hazardous materials response, the routes by which chemicals enter the human body will be considered first. Knowledge of these routes will support the selection of personal protective equipment and the development of safety plans. The second section deals with dose-response relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Hazardous Chemicals
    A Publication of Reliable Methods for the Preparation of Organic Compounds Working with Hazardous Chemicals The procedures in Organic Syntheses are intended for use only by persons with proper training in experimental organic chemistry. All hazardous materials should be handled using the standard procedures for work with chemicals described in references such as "Prudent Practices in the Laboratory" (The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2011; the full text can be accessed free of charge at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12654). All chemical waste should be disposed of in accordance with local regulations. For general guidelines for the management of chemical waste, see Chapter 8 of Prudent Practices. In some articles in Organic Syntheses, chemical-specific hazards are highlighted in red “Caution Notes” within a procedure. It is important to recognize that the absence of a caution note does not imply that no significant hazards are associated with the chemicals involved in that procedure. Prior to performing a reaction, a thorough risk assessment should be carried out that includes a review of the potential hazards associated with each chemical and experimental operation on the scale that is planned for the procedure. Guidelines for carrying out a risk assessment and for analyzing the hazards associated with chemicals can be found in Chapter 4 of Prudent Practices. The procedures described in Organic Syntheses are provided as published and are conducted at one's own risk. Organic Syntheses, Inc., its Editors, and its Board of Directors do not warrant or guarantee the safety of individuals using these procedures and hereby disclaim any liability for any injuries or damages claimed to have resulted from or related in any way to the procedures herein.
    [Show full text]
  • High Hazard Chemical Policy
    Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual Issue Date: 2/23/2011 Policy # EHS-200.09 High Hazard Chemical Policy 1.0 PURPOSE: To minimize hazardous exposures to high hazard chemicals which include select carcinogens, reproductive/developmental toxins, chemicals that have a high degree of toxicity. 2.0 SCOPE: The procedures provide guidance to all LSUHSC personnel who work with high hazard chemicals. 3.0 REPONSIBILITIES: 3.1 Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) shall: • Provide technical assistance with the proper handling and safe disposal of high hazard chemicals. • Maintain a list of high hazard chemicals used at LSUHSC, see Appendix A. • Conduct exposure assessments and evaluate exposure control measures as necessary. Maintain employee exposure records. • Provide emergency response for chemical spills. 3.2 Principle Investigator (PI) /Supervisor shall: • Develop and implement a laboratory specific standard operation plan for high hazard chemical use per OSHA 29CFR 1910.1450 (e)(3)(i); Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. • Notify EH&S of the addition of a high hazard chemical not previously used in the laboratory. • Ensure personnel are trained on specific chemical hazards present in the lab. • Maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all chemicals, either on the computer hard drive or in hard copy. • Coordinate the provision of medical examinations, exposure monitoring and recordkeeping as required. 3.3 Employees: • Complete all necessary training before performing any work. • Observe all safety
    [Show full text]
  • Dimethyl Sulfate Use CAS No
    Report on Carcinogens, Fourteenth Edition For Table of Contents, see home page: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc Dimethyl Sulfate Use CAS No. 77-78-1 Dimethyl sulfate is used primarily as a methylating agent to convert compounds such as phenols, amines, and thiols to the correspond- Reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen ing methyl derivatives (IARC 1999). It is also used as a methylating or sulfating agent in the manufacture of methyl esters, ethers, and First listed in the Second Annual Report on Carcinogens (1981) amines in dyes, drugs, perfumes, pesticides, phenol derivatives, fab- OO ric softeners, polyurethane-based adhesives, and other organic chem- icals. Dimethyl sulfate is also used as a solvent for the separation of H3C S CH3 O O mineral oils, for the analysis of auto fluids, and with boron to sta- Carcinogenicity bilize liquid sulfur trioxide (HSDB 2009). It was formerly used as a chemical weapon. Dimethyl sulfate is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcino- Production gen based on sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in experimental animals. Dimethyl sulfate has been produced commercially since at least the 1920s (IARC 1974, 1999). One production method is continuous re- Cancer Studies in Experimental Animals action of dimethyl ether with sulfur trioxide (IARC 1974). In 2009, Dimethyl sulfate caused tumors in rats at several different tissue sites dimethyl sulfate was produced by 33 manufacturers worldwide, in- and by several different routes of exposure. Inhalation exposure to cluding 1 in the United States, 14 in China, 5 in India, 5 in Europe, 6 dimethyl sulfate caused cancer of the nasal cavity (squamous-cell car- in East Asia, and 2 in Mexico (SRI 2009), and was available from 44 cinoma) and other local tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • 121)ANISOLE( ROS :- Process
    121) ANISOLE (CAS Number : 100-66-3) ROS :- OCH 3 OH TOLUENE NaHSO4 + CH3SO4Na + sodium methyl sulfate 120gm/mole Phenol 134 Anisole Mol wt :- 94gm/mole Mol wt :- 108 gm/mole Process :- Take phenol, sodium methyl sulfate & toluene in Reactor. Heating reflux & Mataintane for 14-hrs at reflux temp. cool to RT. Centrifuge salt .distilled solvent product distilled .collect product & packing. Flow diagram :- Phenol - 500kg CH3SO4Na-712 kg Toluene -500kg Reactor Maintaine-110 ° C Maintain & Centrifuge NaHSO4 SALT - 600kg Loss -10 kg Reactor Recover of toluene -480 kg Product-500kg Effluents – 122 kg Mass Balance :- INPUT QTY OUTPUT QTY Phenol 500 kg Product 500 kg Toluene 500 kg Recover Toluene 480 kg Ch3SO4Na 712 kgs NaHso4 salt 600 KG effluent 122 kg loss 10 kg TOTAL 1712 KG 1712 KG 122)VERATROLE (CAS Number: 91-16-7) ROS :- OCH 3 OH OCH OH TOLUENE 3 2NaHSO4 + 2CH3SO4Na + sodium methyl sulfate 120gm/mole Catechol 134 Veratrole Mol wt :- 110gm/mole Mol wt :- 138 gm/mole Process :- Take Catechol, sodium methyl sulfate & toluene in Reactor. Heating reflux & Mataintane for 14-hrs at reflux temp. cool to RT. Centrifuge salt .distilled solvent product distilled .collect product & packing. Flow diagram :- Catechol - 560kg CH3SO4Na-1364 kg Toluene -1000kg Reactor Maintaine-110 ° C Maintain & Centrifuge NaHSO4 SALT - 1100kg Reactor Recover of toluene -980 kg Loss-10 kg Effluents - 334kg Product-500kg Mass Balance :- INPUT QTY OUTPUT QTY Catechol 560 kg Product 500 kg Toluene 1000 kg Recover Toluene 980 kg CH3SO4Na 1364 kgs NaHso4 salt 1100 KG effluent 334 kg loss 10 kg TOTAL 2924 KG 2924 KG 123) 3-methoxy-4-hydroxy-benzaldehyde(Vanillin) (CAS Number : 121-33- 5) ROS :- OH 2NaoH (40) OH CHO OCH 3 TOLUENE OCH 3 + + 2NaHSO4 + 2H2O HOOC 2H2SO4 (18) (98) 120gm/mole OH guaiacol glyoxylic acid HOOC 124 78 3- methoxy-4-Hydroxy mandelic acid 198 METHANOL NaoH O2 GAS (40) H2SO4 (98) OH OCH NaHSO4 3 + +CO2(44)+2H2O(18) 120gm/mole CHO 3- methoxy-4-Hydroxy Benzaldehyde 153 Process :- Take 50 % glyoxylic acid & water in reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Author Version (PDF)
    RSC Advances This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been accepted for publication. Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free service, authors can make their results available to the community, in citable form, before we publish the edited article. This Accepted Manuscript will be replaced by the edited, formatted and paginated article as soon as this is available. You can find more information about Accepted Manuscripts in the Information for Authors. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains. www.rsc.org/advances Page 1 of RSC4 Advances RSC Advances Dynamic Article Links ► Cite this: DOI: 10.1039/c0xx00000x www.rsc.org/xxxxxx Communication Catalytic etherification of hydroxyl compounds to methyl ethers with 1,2-dimethoxyethane a,b a a,b a Penghua Che, Fang Lu,* Xiaoqin Si and Jie Xu* Received (in XXX, XXX) Xth XXXXXXXXX 20XX, Accepted Xth XXXXXXXXX 20XX 5 DOI: 10.1039/b000000x 1,2-Dimethoxyethane is explored for the first time as In this work, DMET is explored for the first time as etherification agent for the acid-catalyzed synthesis of 50 etherification agent for the acid-catalyzed synthesis of methyl methylethers from biomass-derived hydroxyl compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • (2-Methoxyethyl) Benzene Using Li/Mgo Catalyst
    J. Chem. Sci. Vol. 129, No. 11, November 2017, pp. 1771–1779. © Indian Academy of Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-017-1395-y REGULAR ARTICLE Special Issue on Recent Trends in the Design and Development of Catalysts and their Applications Green synthetic route for perfumery compound (2-methoxyethyl) benzene using Li/MgO catalyst POOJA R TAMBE and GANAPATI D YADAV∗ Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Nathalal Parekh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 019, India E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] MS received 17 July 2017; revised 27 September 2017; accepted 28 September 2017; published online 16 November 2017 Abstract. Ethers are one of the most prominent compounds among perfumery chemicals. (2-Methoxyethyl) benzene commonly known as phenyl ethyl methyl ether (PEME) is widely used in flavour and fragrance industries. Conventionally, synthesis of PEME involves the use of hazardous and polluting chemicals, which in turn affects the purity of perfumery compound. Thus, developing a green route to synthesise PEME without any hazardous chemicals is desirable. In the current work, a new process is developed for the synthesis of PEME using solid base catalysts including MgO and Li/MgO (with different loadings of lithium) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) as a methylating agent as well as a solvent. Different kinetic parameters were studied to achieve the optimum yield of the desired product. At optimum reaction conditions i.e., 1000 rpm of speed, 1.33 × 10−2 g/cm3 of catalyst loading, 1:10.5 mole ratio (2-Phenyl ethanol: DMC), 180 ◦C, 95% conversion of 2-phenyl ethanol with 98% selectivity of PEME was achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Aem00158-0116.Pdf
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Jan. 1984, p. 98-100 Vol. 47, No. 1 0099-2240/84/010098-03$02.00/0 Copyright © 1984, American Society for Microbiology Isolation, Chemical Structure, Acute Toxicity, and Some Physicochemical Properties of Territrem C from Aspergillus terreus KUO HUANG LING,* HORNG-HUEI LIOU, CHUEN-MAO YANG, AND CHUNG-KUANG YANG Institute of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China Received 1 August 1983/Accepted 17 October 1983 Territrem C, a new tremorgenic mycotoxin (C28H3209; molecular weight, 512.20) was isolated from the chloroform extract of rice cultures of Aspergillus terreus 23-1, which also produces territrems A and B. Isolation, acute toxicity, and some physicochemical properties of territrem C are discussed in this paper. The spectral and chemical evidence indicated that the structural difference between territrem C and territrem B (C29H3409) was in their phenyl moieties: a 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy phenyl group in territrem C and a 3,4,5-trimethoxy phenyl group in territrem B. It was also demonstrated that territrem B was obtained by methylation of territrem C with dimethyl sulfate. In our laboratory, two structure-related tremorgenic phenolic group in TRC, it easily turned light yellow. Howev- mycotoxins, territrem A (TRA) (C28H3009) and territrem er, when TRC was dissolved or suspended in absolute B (TRB) (C29H3409), were isolated from the chloroform ethanol and kept in a refrigerator (at 5 ± 0.5°C) the solution extract of rice cultures of Aspergillus terreus 23-1 (6). or crystal remained colorless. The purity of the compound The structure of TRB was (4aR,6aR,12aS,12bS)- was confirmed by TLC as well as by high-pressure liquid 4a,6,6a,12,12a,12b-hexahydro-4a,12a,dihydroxy-4,4,6a,12b- chromatography.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrochemical Synthesis of Anisole on Platinum Anode Surface
    Applied Surface Science 459 (2018) 446–452 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Surface Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apsusc Full Length Article Electrochemical synthesis of anisole on platinum anode surface: Experiment and first-principle study T ⁎ Zhengwei Zhanga, , Qiang Wanga,b a The Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Chemistry of Arid Zones, The Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 830011 Urumchi, China b University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The anisole is synthesized by electrolyzing of phenol (or sodium phenate) and tetramethylammonium chloride Phenol (TMAC). The production forms on the Pt anode surface and not in the solution. There are adequate supplies of Sodium phenate methyl radicals in all solutions. The phenoxyl radical is difficult to form in phenol-TMAC solution, and thus the Methylation yield is low. The sodium phenate is easily oxidized into phenoxyl radical, and hence there is high yield. Tetramethyl ammonium chloride Anisole 1. Introduction The dimethyl carbonate with low toxicity as methyl source is used in the methylation process of phenol derivatives. Because it’s low-ac- The methylation process of phenol hydroxyl is widely investigated, tivity, the methylation reaction has to be catalyzed at high temperature such as synthesis of fine chemicals, modification of drug molecules and and high pressure. To find an effective catalyst is a key point for the transformation of natural products. According to the reported methy- reaction. Lee and co-workers [6] provided high temperature and high lation methods, there are five methyl sources: iodomethane, dimethyl pressure by using of autoclave, and researched alkali carbonates as sulfate, dimethyl carbonate, methanol and other rarely used reagents.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compatibility Storage Group
    CHEMICAL SEGREGATION Chemicals are to be segregated into 11 different categories depending on the compatibility of that chemical with other chemicals The Storage Groups are as follows: Group A – Compatible Organic Acids Group B – Compatible Pyrophoric & Water Reactive Materials Group C – Compatible Inorganic Bases Group D – Compatible Organic Acids Group E – Compatible Oxidizers including Peroxides Group F– Compatible Inorganic Acids not including Oxidizers or Combustible Group G – Not Intrinsically Reactive or Flammable or Combustible Group J* – Poison Compressed Gases Group K* – Compatible Explosive or other highly Unstable Material Group L – Non-Reactive Flammable and Combustible, including solvents Group X* – Incompatible with ALL other storage groups The following is a list of chemicals and their compatibility storage codes. This is not a complete list of chemicals, but is provided to give examples of each storage group: Storage Group A 94‐75‐7 2,4‐D (2,4‐Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) 94‐82‐6 2,4‐DB 609-99-4 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid 64‐19‐7 Acetic acid (Flammable liquid @ 102°F avoid alcohols, Amines, ox agents see SDS) 631-61-8 Acetic acid, Ammonium salt (Ammonium acetate) 108-24-7 Acetic anhydride (Flammable liquid @102°F avoid alcohols see SDS) 79‐10‐7 Acrylic acid Peroxide Former 65‐85‐0 Benzoic acid 98‐07‐7 Benzotrichloride 98‐88‐4 Benzoyl chloride 107-92-6 Butyric Acid 115‐28‐6 Chlorendic acid 79‐11‐8 Chloroacetic acid 627‐11‐2 Chloroethyl chloroformate 77‐92‐9 Citric acid 5949-29-1 Citric acid monohydrate 57-00-1 Creatine 20624-25-3
    [Show full text]