University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2014 Bombing, Tagging, Writing: An Analysis of the Significance of Graffiti and Street Art Lindsay Bates University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Art and Design Commons, and the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Bates, Lindsay, "Bombing, Tagging, Writing: An Analysis of the Significance of Graffiti and Street Art" (2014). Theses (Historic Preservation). 570. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/570 Suggested Citation: Bates, Lindsay (2014). Bombing, Tagging, Writing: An Analysis of the Significance of Graffiti and Street Art. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/570 For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Bombing, Tagging, Writing: An Analysis of the Significance of Graffiti and Street Art Abstract A first look upon a well-contrived piece of graffiti or street art may inspire feelings of surprise, delight, and amusement, but the connection between graffiti and cultural heritage might be more difficulto t perceive. Conventionally, graffiti was synonymous withandalism, v associated with a subculture that needed to be extinguished immediately. However, with the works of such artists as Basquiat, Keith Haring, Banksy, Steve Powers, and the like, graffiti begano t be recognized as something more than crime – something with far more value, something that could reach beyond the walls of a gallery. Indeed, this subculture has since proliferated exponentially, and with its popularity a closer connection to heritage becomes more apparent. Though it may be a more radical and alternative way of creating heritage, its increasing recognition suggests that such cultural values are clearly demonstrated.