DOCSLIB.ORG

Session #3: Review of Recent SDRCC And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Session #3: Review of Recent SDRCC And Review of SDRCC Jurisprudence Matthew R. Wilson Arbitrator [email protected] Montreal January 30, 2020 Overview Since last SDRCC Conference: 24 awards (22 in 2019) 1 Governance 2 Jurisdiction 2 Costs 19 Eligibility/Selection/Carding Hearings routinely conducted on an expedited basis Eligibility/Selection/Carding SDRCC 19-0394 Tulk v. Wrestling Canada (Lawless) Late registration to Roman-Greco in National Championships Claimant a minor, mother – recent brain tumour treatment impacting senses – failed to register on time Wrestling Canada sympathetic, but determined it did not have discretion to allow late registration Eligibility/Selection/Carding SDRCC 19-0394 Tulk v. Wrestling Canada (Lawless) (cont’d) Arbitrator: Factors for decision-maker to consider: The importance of the matter; The necessity of finality (i.e. for creating start lists or booking tickets, etc.); The age of the applicant; The degree of “fault” of an applicant and any explanation for the failure; The steps an applicant took to correct the mistake or timeliness of any application for redress; The relative prejudice to the applicant, the organization, and other participants / affected persons. Appeal allowed; Wrestling Canada directed to allow late registration Eligibility/Selection/Carding SDRCC 19-0404/05 Browne and Nordiq Canada (Fortier) Two issues: (1) Team selection: (a) Late publication of selection criteria (6-7 weeks instead of 3 mths) (b) Notice to submit curtailment of training due to health reasons too short as well as problems with French translation (2) Carding: Request to be issued a funding card Eligibility/Selection/Carding SDRCC 19-0404/05 Browne and Nordiq Canada (Fortier) (cont’d) Arbitrator: (a) Focus of inquiry was on subjective criteria – arbitrator reviewed the evidence and deferred to Nordiq Canada’s decision (b) Significant difference between French and English criteria; however athlete author of her own misfortune in not notifying Nordiq Canada Arbitrator unable to award carding status as criteria only allowed carding for selected athletes Eligibility/Selection/Carding Other Notable Decisions: SDRCC 18-0377 Daniels v. Canoe Kayak Canada (Roberts) SDRCC 19-0380 Shamiya v. Wrestling Canada (Panko) SDRCC 19-0386/7 Wheelchair Basketball Canada v. Canada Games Council (Webster) SDRCC 19-0388 Girard v. Speed Skating Canada (SSC) (Soubliére) SDRCC 19-0392 Hynes v. Nordiq Canada (Lawless) SDRCC 19-0406 Onyshko v. Gymnastics Canada (GymCan) (Brunet) SDRCC 19-0411 Adhihetty v. Cricket Canada (Brunet) SDRCC 19-0415 O’Neill v. Canoe Kayak Canada (Roberts) SDRCC 19-0417 Karstadt v. Gymnastics Canada (Johnston) SDRCC 19-0425 Loutit v. Rowing Canada Aviron (Peterson) Governance SDRCC 18-0376 Sharara and Table Tennis Canada (Banack) Table Tennis Canada found claimant ineligible to run for President because of a conflict of interest volunteer member of Bd. of Dirs. of Table Tennis Canada Marketing Services International (TTCMSI) signed a cooperation agreement with Quebec Table Tennis Federation Governance SDRCC 18-0376 Sharara and Table Tennis Canada (Banack) (cont’d) Hearing de novo? Arbitrator held that he is not required to give any deference to decision- maker, unless the decision-maker has specialized knowledge or expertise. No specialized knowledge or expertise. Bias? “… what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically — and having thought the matter through — conclude?” Governance SDRCC 18-0376 Sharara and Table Tennis Canada (Banack) (cont’d) Arbitrator held: Decision was biased Claimant no longer a volunteer board member with TTCMSI No conflict of interest with his involvement in Quebec Table Tennis Federation Table Tennis Canada made decision based on erroneous information, never raised concerns in advance of its decision. Nomination reinstated. Jurisdiction SDRCC 19-0411 Adhihetty v Cricket Canada (Decary Q.C.) Claimant challenged Cricket Canada’s decision to not allow him to be drafted to a team at the 2019 Global T20 Canada cricket tournament Arbitrator: Two parties involved in a sports related dispute (s. 1.1 of the Code) Internal appeal process exhausted (s. 3.1(b)) Claimant had sent “request to appeal”, which received no response Arbitrator held that appeal process had effectively been exhausted Costs SDRCC 19-0396 Tong v. Badminton Alberta (McIntyre) Team Selection case involving 13-year old boy Father advocating on son’s behalf; also a certified coach Prior to announcement of team selection, father sought to have son added to team (outside of criteria) under the threat of litigation Arbitrator described behaviour as “bullying” Awarded: $1,500 in costs Costs SDRCC 19-0396 Tong v. Badminton Alberta (McIntyre) (cont’d) “Such an award should signal to Mr. Tong and others to be judicious about what disputes need be redressed and not to use their superior financial resources as a weapon to force sporting organizations to depart from their policies and procedures in order to advantage the athletic aspirations of a small few. Fairness demands that all athletes in the sport are able to compete under the same rules and criteria.” Costs SDRCC 19-0380 Shamiya v. Wrestling Canada Lutte (WCL) (Panko) Original award issued on May 22, 2019 Arbitrator stated costs award was unlikely, but offered to consider submissions. No submissions from Respondent or Affected Party Intervenor sought costs from Claimant (arguing that Claimant’s counsel vigorously pursued unsubstantiated, serious, and defamatory allegations) Costs SDRCC 19-0380 Shamiya v. Wrestling Canada Lutte (WCL) (Panko) (cont’d) Arbitrator considered factors in section 6.22(c) Claimant inappropriately raised issues of more general concern that were unsubstantiated --- this was overzealous advocacy Claimant requested Med/Arb process, which could lead to a more expeditious process Claimant made a settlement offer (but due to allegations, no surprise it was rejected) Respondent was entirely successful Significant factor: Claimant’s undisputed financial struggles as a recent university graduate with significant debt Costs declined Also declined to award costs against lawyer personally Costs SDRCC 19-0416 – Corey v. Speed Skating Canada (SSC) (Bennett) Claimant partially successful, but not successful on its main ground of appeal Outcome of Proceedings - A critical factor, but not a determining factor --- success on its own does not warrant an award of costs --- s. 6.22(c) says as much Conduct of Parties - Requires significant misconduct – where the claimant is unsuccessful, the conduct must have harmed the claimant’s interests and delayed a decision (note there were disagreements over procedure, but they were resolved without delay) Intent - Bad faith is a factor in determining whether to award costs Fostering Integrity in Sport with Dispute Resolution SDRCC & CAS SEMINAR | Montréal, 30 January 2020 REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT OUTLINE 1. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 2. ELIGIBILITY MATTERS 3. DISCIPLINARY MATTERS REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT 1. PROCEDURAL MATTERS REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT a. CAS 2019/A/6298 Manchester City FC v. UEFA REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT Exhaustion of internal legal remedies Art. 34 CFCB Procedural Rules: 1. A party directly affected has the right to appeal a final decision of the CFCB. 2. Final decisions of the CFCB may only be appealed before the CAS (...). Only “final decisions” that directly affect a party can be appealed before CAS Also final decisions of the Investigatory Chamber (cf. Art. 34(3) CFCB Procedural Rules 2019: “the final decision of the CFCB investigatory or adjudicatory chamber, respectively”) REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT Referral to the Adjudicatory Chamber Art. 14(1) CFCB Procedural Rules: At the end of the investigation, the CFCB chief investigator (...) may decide to: a) dismiss the case; or b) conclude, with the consent of the defendant, a settlement agreement; or c) apply, with the consent of the defendant, disciplinary measures (...) d) refer the case to the adjudicatory chamber A referral decision is not final The Adjudicatory Chamber may still decide to dismiss the entire case In principle, an appeal against a referral decision of the Investigatory Chamber is premature REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT Exhaustion of internal legal remedies An exception would be warranted in case irreparable harm would be incurred and in case the proceedings would be wholly unbearable On a prima facie basis, no procedural violations of such a nature that MCFC legitimately lost all faith in fair proceedings and a fair decision The Adjudicatory Chamber will seriously assess MCFC’s procedural complaints In any event, procedural deficiencies will be reviewable in an appeal to CAS against a decision of the Adjudicatory Chamber REVIEW OF RECENT CAS JURISPRUDENCE JEAN-PHILIPPE DUBEY | HEAD OF CAS SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENT Answer to MCFC of the Investigatory Chamber Simple response to MCFC’s request that the investigation be suspended Does not contain any decision refusing to stay the proceedings Merely indicates that the Chief Investigator rejects MCFC’s allegations Not an actual decision, merely a communication of information Did not
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Team Selection Policy
    www.rowingcanada.org NATIONAL TEAM SELECTION POLICY Introduction 1. Under its Constitution and By-Laws, Rowing Canada Aviron (RCA) has as one of its objectives the responsibility "to organize, develop and select national rowing teams to represent Canada internationally". In accordance with this objective, RCA has established programs for the development of national rowing teams including but not limited to, Para, Junior, Under 23 and Senior teams. This policy statement, approved by the RCA Board of Directors, sets out the policy governing the selection of athletes to those teams. National Team Objective 2. The objective of the National Team is to win gold medals at the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Attendance at other international competitions is part of the development of the National Team towards achieving that objective. Winning any medal at any of these events is recognized as a considerable achievement but the objective is to win gold at the Olympic and Paralympic Games. International Competition 3. Prior to the start of the year the National Team Performance Directors and coaches, in consultation with and subject to the approval of the High Performance Director, will create the high performance program for the year. This includes the international competitions to be attended and the anticipated size of the teams for those competitions having regard to the need for teams to gain international racing experience and the financial budget projected to be allocated to High Performance programs for the year. 4. The National Team Objective at the senior level is to develop a team that can be competitive in as many events as possible at the Olympic and Paralympic Games and, in intervening years, at the senior World Rowing Championships with emphasis on the Olympic events.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 ANNUAL REPORT RCA PURPOSE INSPIRE GROWTH and EXCELLENCE in Canada Through the Sport of Rowing
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT RCA PURPOSE INSPIRE GROWTH AND EXCELLENCE in Canada through the sport of rowing. RCA VISION TABLE OF CONTENTS CANADA IS A LEADING 4 INTRODUCTION ROWING NATION 6 TREASURER’S REPORT To be a leader and an exemplar of best practice in sport development as well as sustainable success on 8 2018 ACTIVITY the international stage. To be seen as a nation that is 10 2018 RESULTS pushing boundaries and challenging the status quo as we seek to grow and get better everyday. 20 2018 MEMBERSHIP DEMOGRAPHICS & NATIONAL ACTIVITY 30 IN RECOGNITION 32 BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 34 APPENDIX - AUDITOR’S REPORT & FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35 > INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 36 > FINANCIALS 46 THANK YOU INTRODUCTION PRESIDENT AND CEO REPORT This has been a year of change and has captured a more accurate representation of the Hall of Fame continues to grow in significance, This year we saw more schools enjoying a successful a year of creating a foundation for participants of rowing in Canada. All Canadian and we look forward to announcing the class of 2019 Canadian Secondary Schools Rowing Association rowers pay a low base fee to register for membership to join those from 2018 inducted in January at the Regatta. The 136th Royal Canadian Henley future growth. We are committed and then a seat fee for each event they enter at a Conference last year. Regatta continues to set the benchmark for club to shifting the organization to more sanctioned event. This ‘pay as you row’ approach regattas across the World. The National Rowing open processes and input from assigns the cost to those who participate more in the It is hard to reflect on the last year without recognizing Championships significantly raised the bar on what can be achieved through the application of modern community as we make decisions sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Rca Rules of Racing Approved January 28, 2018
    RCA RULES OF RACING APPROVED JANUARY 28, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 Scope 5 1.1 TITLE 5 1.2 ROWING 5 1.3 ROWING BOAT 5 1.4 ROWING REGATTA 5 1.5 APPLICATION OF THE RULES OF RACING 5 1.6 EXCEPTIONS 6 1.7 CANADIAN NATIONAL REGATTAS 6 1.8 INTERNATIONAL ROWING REGATTAS 6 1.9 AUTHORIZATION FOR INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION 7 1.10 AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF RACING 7 Part 2 Competitors 8 2.1 THE DEFINITION OF A COMPETITOR 8 2.2 CREW 9 2.3 CATEGORIES OF ROWERS & PROOF OF AGE AND IDENTITY 9 2.4 COXSWAINS 10 2.5 COXSWAINS WEIGHTS 10 2.6 WEIGHING OF COXSWAINS 11 2.7 MASTERS ROWERS 11 2.8 MASTERS AGE ADJUSTED TIME SYSTEMS 13 2.9 MIXED EVENTS 13 2.10 LIGHTWEIGHT COMPETITORS 13 2.11 WEIGHING OF ATHLETES IN WEIGHT RESTRICTED EVENTS 14 2.12 PARA COMPETITORS 15 Part 3 Equipment 16 3.1 CLASSES OF BOATS 16 3.2 CONSTRUCTION OF ROWING BOATS AND EQUIPMENT 16 3.3 BOAT BOWS 21 3.4 SUBSTANCES OR STRUCTURES 21 3.5 QUICK RELEASE FOOT STRETCHERS 21 3.6 COXSWAIN’S COCKPIT 21 3.7 OAR BLADES 22 3.8 FLOTATION REQUIREMENT 22 3.9 PARA ROWING EQUIPMENT 22 Part 4 Regatta Facilities 26 4.1 LENGTH, MARKING AND NUMBER OF LANES OF COURSE 26 4.2 STRETCHES OF WATER – STANDARD COURSE 26 JANUARY 28, 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.3 WIND AND WATER CONDITIONS 27 4.4 PLAN OF REGATTA SITE 27 4.5 NON-STANDARD COURSE 27 4.6 TECHNICAL INSTALLATIONS – CATEGORY A 27 4.7 TECHNICAL INSTALLATIONS – CATEGORY B 27 Part 5 Regatta Organization 28 5.1 DUTIES OF THE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (OC) 28 5.2 REGATTA CHAIR 28 5.3 COURSE, INSTALLATIONS, DRAW, JURY, 28 CONTROL COMMISSION 5.4 RADIO AND TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
    [Show full text]
  • Rowing Draft.Indd
    LTAD Competition Review PANTONE 186 FONT: DICOT MEDIUM PANTONE 186 LTAD COMPETITION REVIEW 1 FONT: DICOT MEDIUM LTAD Competition Review Contributors Al Morrow, 1999 FISA Coach of the Year, Inducted into Canadian Sport Hall of Fame 2006, coach of World & Olympic medalists Brenda Taylor, World and Olympic Champion Ian McFarlane, Former High School Principal, Rowing Coach for over 30 years at club, university and national level Istvan Balyi , MSc, International expert on planning, periodization and LTAD Volker Nolte, PhD, Head Men’s Coach at UWO and Assistant Professor, University of Western Ontario Richard Way, MBA, Charter Professional Coach, LTAD Expert Carolyn Trono, RCA Director of Coach Development Photo Credits Cover page - Jarret Poitras Page 3 - Courtesy of Rowing Canada Page 8 - Zoe Hoskins Page 9 - David Chidley for Rowing Canada Page25 - Shivani Parmar for Hudson Boatworks Page 31 - Jarret Poitras Jackie Skender & Volker Nolte LTAD COMPETITION REVIEW 3 Executive Summary The Coach Education and Development Committee (CEDC) was asked to review the current system of rowing competitions in Canada and recommend changes necessary for it to support and be consistent with RCA’s Long Term Athlete Development Plan. The recommendations reflect what we think the best competition system would look like, taking into account fixed constraints such as climate, geography, the academic schedule and the FISA calendar, but unfettered by tradition and history. The recommendations for the “competition system” address race types, boat classes, progression (both within a regatta and between regattas) and the annual competition schedule. Recommendations are made for each stage in LTAD (from Learning to Train to Active for Life) as well as for the system as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • 201718 Seniorteam Memo
    NATIONAL SENIOR TEAM MEMO 2017/18 Update: May 15, 2017 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS AND QUALIFICATION CRITERIA FOR PLANNED SENIOR COMPETITIONS FOR 2017 and 2018 WORLD TABLE TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIPS May 29 – June 5, 2017 Düsseldorf, Germany Date of selection: March 15, 2017 TTCAN will fund up to two men and two women; additional self-funded players may join the team; funding support will be according to the TTCAN National Team Selection Policy. CANADIAN ENTRY QUALIFICATION: Players with the highest sum of points: ITTF World Ranking – ITTF WR points/5, CAN Ranking – CAN Rating points/10, Canada Cup Finals points: 1st 200 2nd 150 3rd 100 4th 50 5th 25 2017 PANAM CUP, San José, Costa Rica – July 28-30, 2017 Date of selection: June 15, 2017 TTCAN will fund up to two men and two women (based on PANAM Cup entry regulations); funding support will be according to the TTCAN National Team Selection Policy. CANADIAN ENTRY QUALIFICATION: Players with the highest sum of points: ITTF World Ranking (points x 1.5); CAN Ranking; Canada Cup Finals points: 1st 200 2nd 100 3rd 50 Team members for the PANAM Championships must be World Championships eligible. 2017 PANAM CHAMPIONSHIPS, Cartagena, Colombia – September 11-17, 2017 Date of selection: July 17, 2017 TTCAN will fund up to four men and four women; funding support will be according to the TTCAN National Team Selection Policy for the top 3 qualified players; a fourth player may be added as a self-funded member of the team. Only players who will participate in the preparation program as planned by the National Team Coach will be selected for the team.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextgen Selection Guidelines Update – April 16Th, 2021
    NextGen Selection Guidelines Update – April 16th, 2021 Athletes should ensure they have read the 2021 NextGen Selection Guidelines (LINK) and previous updates on the RCA Website to ensure they have all information related to 2021 Selection. It should be noted that selection process for all NextGen programs may change pending World Rowing’s confirmation of events, changes to any governmental policy or restrictions and local conditions which may impact travel or training. Rowing Canada Aviron is constantly monitoring the COVID implication and updating plans accordingly under the guidance of its Chief Medical Officer. In this communication: 1. Updates to selection process a. Invitation to Selection events – All Programs b. Selection events and locations: World Rowing Under 23 Championships i. LWT Erg Submission details c. Selection events and locations: World Rowing Junior Championships and Can Am Mex 2. Updates to NextGen Coaching team and Program Assignments The following outlines changes to the NextGen Selection Guidelines, that will be implemented immediately. Invitation to Selection Events – all programs update • Water Qualifications scheduled for May of 2021 are CANCELLED. Due to the ongoing impact of COVID, and the ability to run competitions there will be no Water Qualification Events in the spring of 2021 • The Primary Ergometer Qualification will become the primary form of invitation to Selection Events. The Primary Ergometer Qualification consists of a 2k erg submission completed between May 2nd and 8th. Any athlete unable to complete this submission must request an exemption prior to May 1st, 2021. Requests can be directed to Chuck McDiarmid [email protected] • Additional athletes may be invited to selection events based on their engagement and performance through pre-selection training opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Nextgen Selection Guidelines
    ROWING CANADA AVIRON 2021 NextGen National Team Selection Guidelines ROWING CANADA AVIRON – 2021 NextGen NATIONAL SELECTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents Purpose ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………...…....3 Overview ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..…..3 Scope ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……..3 Selection Eligibility Requirements ………………………………………………………………………………………….………3 1. General Eligibility Requirements ……………………………………………………………………….…………………3 2. Age and other additional Eligibility requirements ……………………………………………………………4 3. Athletes tracking and monitoring (RADAR) ………………………………………………………..……………4 4. Letter of intent …………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..……………4 5. Athlete agreement …………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………4 6. Athlete Fees ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……….……………4 Selection Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………4 Selection authority ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…6 Final Selection Dates ……………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………….…6 Authority to make changes to the composition of crews – once the team is selected……….6 On-site decision-making authority ………………………………………………………….……………………………………..6 Special circumstances ………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………7 Removal from team once selected …………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Appeal process ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Relocation and Team funding ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 Event requirements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………9
    [Show full text]
  • Sdrcc 18-0376 Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (Sdrcc) Centre De Reglement Des Differends Sportifs Du Canada (Crdsc)
    No.: SDRCC 18-0376 SPORT DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRE OF CANADA (SDRCC) CENTRE DE REGLEMENT DES DIFFERENDS SPORTIFS DU CANADA (CRDSC) ADHAM SHARARA Appellant -and- TABLE TENNIS CANADA (TTCAN) Respondent REASONS FOR AWARD (Hearing by Conference Call January 24, 2019) Arbitrator: Larry Banack MCMILLAN LLP Lawyers-Patent & Trade-mark Agents 45 O'Connor Street, Suite 2000 Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 Timothy Cullen (67466T) Tel (613) 232-7171 Fax (613) 231-3191 Email:[email protected] Lawyers for the Appellant BREEDON LITIGATION 86 Worsley St. Barrie, Ontario L4M 1L8 Ryan Breedon (49277O) Tel. (705) 252-6834 Fax (705) 252-6838 [email protected] Lawyer for the Respondent I. OVERVIEW 1. The Appellant, Mr. Adham Sharara (hereafter Mr. Sharara), appeals the decision of the Respondent, Table Tennis Canada, and specifically its Board of Directors (“TTCAN Board”) finding him ineligible to run for President of TTCAN as a result of a conflict of interest (the “impugned decision”). 2. Mr. Sharara was informed of the impugned decision on September 20, 2018. 3. On September 27, 2018, Mr. Sharara appealed the impugned decision pursuant to the TTCAN Appeals Policy. Mr. Sharara raised five grounds of appeal. 4. An independent TTCAN Tribunal was constituted to review Mr. Sharara’s grounds for appeal (“TTCAN Appeals Tribunal”). The TTCAN Appeals Tribunal concluded that only one ground of appeal, whether the Board’s decision was influenced by bias, should proceed to a hearing before this Tribunal. 5. There is a dispute between the parties as to the proper grounds of appeal before me. For the reasons below, I do not need to resolve this dispute as I grant Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Table Tennis Canada's National Team Policy Identifies the Enlarged
    NATIONAL TEAM POLICY AND SELECTIONS 2013 - 2020 Table Tennis Canada’s National Team Policy identifies the enlarged pool of the National Team Squad, describes the process how Canadian athletes are selected for the National Team, how the funding priority of the National Team Budget is aligned with Table Tennis Canada’s goals in international competitions and the competition activity that is required to attain these goals. The National Team Policy is informed by Table Tennis Canada’s Long Term Athlete Development model that prioritizes training over competition in the early development stages and plans for an increased competition activity in its later stages. 1. NATIONAL TEAM SQUAD This list is produced twice a year (after the Canadian Championships and in the beginning of a new calendar year) and identifies a pool of athletes from which the various National Teams will be selected for different international competitions. Selection procedures are described in this document; for specific events Table Tennis Canada publishes National Team Selection memos. The National Team Squad list serves as a tool to identify young athletes by evaluating their performances. Athletes on the list are monitored by the National Team Coach and the High Performance Committee; the ranking on the list serves as a basis for invitation to National Team Selection competitions. Generally, only athletes on the National Team Squad will be entered in international competitions by Table Tennis Canada (the High Performance Committee may enter athletes not on the Squad under exceptional circumstances.) In exceptional circumstances, an athlete may make an application to the High Performance Committee to be entered into an ITTF competition if the athlete is not on the National Team Squad due to injury, illness, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Athlete Agreement
    CANADIAN AMATEUR ROWING ASSOCIATION ROWING CANADA AVIRON 2021 ATHLETE AGREEMENT PLEASE PRINT NAME ___________________________________________________________ ADDRESS ___________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE ___________________________________________________________ EMAIL ___________________________________________________________ Your selection as a participant in Rowing Canada Aviron’s National Team Program requires that you enter into this Agreement and abide by its terms. This is a legally binding agreement between you and Rowing Canada Aviron. If you do not understand the contents of this Agreement you may wish to consult with a lawyer. Please read this document carefully, as by signing this Agreement you are confirming that you have read and understood it, and that you agree to abide by its terms. Please put your initials on each page in the lower right-hand corner, and return the signed Agreement, to: Rowing Canada Aviron c/o Adam Parfitt, Director of National Team Operations 321 - 4371 Interurban Rd. Victoria, BC V9E 2C5 * Signed & Scanned documents can be sent to: [email protected] A signed copy will be returned to you for your records. RCA 2021 Athlete Agreement 1 Athlete Initial here 2021 ATHLETE AGREEMENT CONTENTS BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 3 TERM AND SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT .............................................................................. 4 RELATED POLICIES AND AGREEMENTS ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • POWERING PODIUMS PARALYMPIC SPORTS NATIONAL LANDSCAPE November 16, 2017
    POWERING PODIUMS PARALYMPIC SPORTS NATIONAL LANDSCAPE November 16, 2017 *** some of the information in this deck has been put together with OTP in preparation for CPC- OTP Summer Sport Summit INTERNATIONAL REALITIES Some Realities • Winning medals at the Paralympic Games is tough and only getting harder • Global sophistication is rising and more countries are placing increasing importance on podium results • Canada has a relatively low population with disabilities – We have an excellent health system in Canada less people with congenital disabilities – We have strong laws for security / transport Less people with acquired disabilities – We have low incidence of participation in major global conflicts CANADIAN PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE | COMITÉ PARALYMPIQUE CANADIEN Some Realities • Canada has been the leader in Paralympic Sport: we have ‘champions’ • Since the 2000 Games, Canada’s medal output has been on downward trend • Canada’s Pool of podium performance athletes continues to decrease • Canada has been relatively benign in adopting aggressive strategies in changing these trends CANADIAN PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE | COMITÉ PARALYMPIQUE CANADIEN SUMMER SPORTS LANDSCAPE Paralympic Summer Sports 72 % of the medal table at the Games- best sports from Rio for Team Canada. • Para Swimming – Swimming Canada • Para Athletics- Athletics Canada • Para Cycling- Cycling Canada Team Sports • Wheelchair Basketball Men’s and Women’s – WBC • Wheelchair Rugby – Canadian Wheelchair Sport Association CANADIAN PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE | COMITÉ PARALYMPIQUE CANADIEN Paralympic Summer Sports Other individuals sports: • Para Equestrian- Equine Canada • Boccia- Boccia Canada • Para Rowing- Rowing Canada • Para Triathlon- Triathlon Canada • Para Canoe- Canoe Kayak Canada • Para Judo- Judo Canada • Para TT- Table Tennis Canada CANADIAN PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE | COMITÉ PARALYMPIQUE CANADIEN Paralympic Summer Sports • Para – Archery- Archery Canada • Para Badminton- Badminton Canada (new) • Football 5 – a Side – Canadian Blind Sports / Soccer Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Athlete Development Pathway Developing the Whole Athlete Over the Long Term Version 16.1 / May 27, 2015 a Special Thank You to Our Contributors
    ROWING CANADA AVIRON ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAY DEVELOPING THE WHOLE ATHLETE OVER THE LONG TERM VERSION 16.1 / MAY 27, 2015 A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO OUR CONTRIBUTORS ROWING CANADA AVIRON STAFF CANADIAN SPORT INSTITUTE PRODUCTION CORE CONTRIBUTORS CORE CONTRIBUTORS TRANSLATION Peter Cookson Ashley Armstrong Julie Thibault Michelle Darvill Kirsten Barnes LAYOUT/DESIGN Paul Hawksworth Nick Clarke Julianne Mullin Chuck McDiarmid Danelle Kabush Colleen Miller SUPPORTING CONTRIBUTOR Terry Paul Ed McNeely John Wetzstein SUPPORTING CONTRIBUTORS CANADIAN ROWING COMMUNITY Donna Atkinson CORE CONTRIBUTOR Sarah Black Roger Meager Howard Campbell SUPPORTING CONTRIBUTORS Dave Derry Colin Mattock Steve DiCiacca Brenda Taylor Annabel Kehoe Phil Marshall CANADIAN SPORT FOR LIFE Martin McElroy CORE CONTRIBUTORS Jacquelyn Novak Colin Higgs Peter Shakespear Richard Way SUPPORTING CONTRIBUTOR ROWING CANADA AVIRON Carolyn Trono COACH EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CORE CONTRIBUTOR Volker Nolte TABLE OF CONTENTS OUR CONTRIBUTORS 2 FORWARD 4 ABOUT THIS COACH RESOURCE 5 OUR VISION: WHY ARE WE DOING THIS? 5 ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAY 6 ROWING CANADA AVIRON AND CANADIAN SPORT FOR LIFE 6 ROWING AND THE EARLY YEARS 7 EARLY-ENTRY/ LATE-ENTRY ATHLETES 7 MASTERS ATHLETES 7 GOLD MEDAL PROFILE AND PODIUM PATHWAY 8 UNDERSTANDING THE ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAY 10 DELIVERING THE ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAY 10 SPORT TECHNICAL AND TACTICAL SKILLS 12 PHYSICAL CAPACITY SKILLS 20 MENTAL (SPORT PSYCHOLOGY) SKILLS 25 LIFE SKILLS 29 APPENDICES 37 NG TH PI E W LO H E O V L E E D A M T R H E L T E T G E N F LO OR THE ROWING CANADA AVIRON ATHLETE DEVELOPMENT PATHWAY 3 FORWARD DEVELOPING, EXCELLING IN, AND FOSTERING ABOUT A LOVE FOR THE SPORT OF ROWING THIS DOCUMENT Rowing Canada Aviron was one of the first national sport organizations to This document is the successor to An Overview: embrace the Canadian Sport for Life initiative and adopt a sport-specific Long Term Athlete Development Plan for Rowing, Long Term Athlete Development program.
    [Show full text]