The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What We Have Learned: Symposium Proceedings; 1999 May 18-20; Missoula, MT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What We Have Learned: Symposium Proceedings; 1999 May 18-20; Missoula, MT United States Department The Bitterroot Ecosystem of Agriculture Forest Service Management Research Project: Rocky Mountain Research Station What We Have Learned General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-17 September 2000 Symposium Proceedings Missoula, Montana May 18-20, 1999 Abstract Smith, Helen Y., ed. 2000. The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What we have learned: symposium proceedings; 1999 May 18-20; Missoula, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-17. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 154 p. The varied topics presented in these symposium proceedings represent the diverse nature of the Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project (BEMRP). Separated into six sections, the papers cover the different themes researched by BEMRP collaborators as well as brief overviews of five other ecosystem management projects. The sections are: Understanding the Ecosystem, Its Parts and Processes; Understanding the People and Their Relationship to the Ecosystem; Implemen- tation for Specific Landscape Areas; Overviews of Other Ecosystem Management Research Projects in the West; Fieldtrip Abstracts; and Poster Session Abstracts. The papers presented here are from a symposium held in order to summarize research conducted under the first five-year charter for BEMRP. The symposium was held 1999 May 18-20 in Missoula, Montana for interested public, land managers, and researchers. Keywords: ecosystem management, forest succession, social sciences, landscape-scale modeling Editor Helen Y. Smith is an Ecologist with the Fire Effects Research Work Unit at the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory in Missoula, Montana. She received a B.S. degree in wildlife biology and an M.S. degree in resource conservation, both from the School of Forestry at The University of Montana. Her research interests include ecological restoration, and relationships between fire and invasive plant species. Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to Janie Canton-Thompson for reading through the document and finding several editorial errors that I had overlooked. You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and number. Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1396 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rm Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: What We Have Learned Symposium Proceedings Missoula, Montana May 18-20, 1999 Editor Helen Y. Smith Table of Conversions Parameter Multiply this unit By this factor To obtain this unit Length feet (ft) 0.305 meters (m) meters (m) 3.281 feet (ft) inches (in) 2.54 centimeters (cm) centimeters (cm) 0.394 inches (in) miles (mi) 1.609 kilometers (km) kilometers (km) 0.622 miles (mi) Area acres (ac) 0.405 hectares (ha) hectares (ha) 2.471 acres (ac) square kilometers (km2)0.386 square mile (mi2) square mile (mi2)2.590 square kilometers (km2) Basal area square feet per acre 0.222 square meters per hectare (ft2/ac) (m2/ha) square meters per hectare 4.496 square feet per acre (m2/ha) (ft2/ac) Flow cubic feet per second 0.028 cubic meters per second (ft3/s) (m3/s) cubic meters per second 35.32 cubic feet per second (m3/s) (ft3/s) Application rate pints per acre (pt/ac) 1.164 liters per hectare (l/ha) liters per hectare (l/ha) 0.859 pints per acre (pt/ac) Pesticide Precautionary Statement This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. CAUTION: PESTICIDES The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. The USDA Forest Service is not responsible for statements and opinions advanced in this publication. Authors are responsible for the content and quality of their papers. ii Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Clinton E. Carlson The Bitterroot Ecosystem Management Research Project: Leslie Weldon How Did It Happen? ................................................................................... 3 Perry Brown Keynote Address: Sustaining People and Ecosystems in the 21st Century ............................................................................................... 6 2. Understanding the Ecosystem: Its Parts and Processes...................................................................... 9 Michael G. Hartwell Comparing Historic and Modern Forests on the Bitterroot Front ................... 11 Paul Alaback Stephen F. Arno Stephen F. Arno Ecosystem-Based Management at Lower Elevations ................................... 17 Carl E. Fiedler Silvicultural Treatments ................................................................................. 19 Michael G. Harrington Fire Applications in Ecosystem Management................................................ 21 Thomas H. DeLuca Soils and Nutrient Considerations ................................................................. 23 Helen Y. Smith Wildlife Habitat Considerations ...................................................................... 26 Colin C. Hardy Associated Riparian Communities................................................................. 28 Robert E. Keane Michael G. Harrington Peter Rice Restoration of Native Plant Communities Infested by Invasive Weeds—Sawmill Creek Research Natural Area........................ 29 Colin C. Hardy Ecosystem-Based Management in the Lodgepole Pine Zone....................... 31 Robert E. Keane Catherine A. Stewart Robert E. Keane Ecosystem-Based Management in the Whitebark Pine Zone ....................... 36 Stephen F. Arno Catherine A. Stewart Len Ruggiero Presence/Absence as a Metric for Monitoring Vertebrate Populations ......... 41 Dean Pearson Dean E. Pearson Small Mammals of the Bitterroot National Forest: Ecological Significance and Guidelines for Management.......................................... 45 Sallie J. Hejl The Effect of Time Period on Point Count Methodology for Thomas G. Thompson Monitoring Breeding Birds ........................................................................ 48 Kerry R. Foresman Overview of Forest Carnivore Survey Efforts in the Bitterroot Mountains ..... 53 3. Understanding the People and Their Relationship to the Ecosystem ............................................... 57 Jane Kapler Smith Agencies Within Communities, Communities Within Ecosystems ................ 59 Kerry McMenus iii Stephen F. McCool Making “Stuff” Happen Through Public Participation and Consensus Building ................................................................................. 67 Linda R. Thomas Behavioral and Cognitive Evaluation of FireWorks Education Trunk ............ 71 James A. Walsh Jane Kapler Smith Charles E. Keegan, III Synergy Between Ecological Needs and Economic Aspects of Carl E. Fiedler Ecosystem Restoration ............................................................................ 74 Stephen F. McCool Social Science and the Bitterroot National Forest: A Synthesis .................... 77 James Burchfield Wayne Freimund 4. Implementation for Specific Landscape Areas .................................................................................... 81 J. G. Jones Stevensville West Central Study ................................................................... 83 J. D. Chew N. K. Christianson D. J. Silvieus C. A. Stewart Robert D. Pfister Developing an Ecosystem Diversity Framework for Landscape Michael D. Sweet Assessment .............................................................................................. 91 Hans R. Zuuring Sequential Use of Simulation and Optimization in Analysis Jimmie D. Chew and Planning ............................................................................................ 97 J. Greg Jones 5. Overviews of Other Ecosystem Management Research Projects in the West................................ 105 Gerald J. Gottfried Achieving Ecosystem Management in the Borderlands of the Carleton B. Edminster Southwestern United States Through Coordinated Research/ Management Partnerships ..................................................................... 107 Jeanne C. Chambers Great Basin Research and Management Project: Restoring and Maintaining Riparian Ecosystem Integrity .............................................. 110 Deborah M. Finch Research of the Rio Grande Ecosystem Management Program ................ 114 Brian Kent The Colorado Front Range Ecosystem Management Research Wayne D. Shepperd Project: Accomplishments to Date ......................................................... 119 Deborah J. Shields Lynn Starr Sustaining the Land, People, and Economy of the Blue Mountains: James McIver The
Recommended publications
  • Flower Power
    FLOWER POWER IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN WHAT IS A FLOWER? INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVE: When students finish this project, they will have gained respect for the beauty of flowers and appreciate their ecological and practical importance. INTRODUCTION Dear Teacher, The Idaho Botanical Garden is an outdoor learning environment. We want to make your visit comfortable and enjoyable, and ask that your students are dressed appropriately for the weather and have water, especially in the warm weather months. TERMS Angiosperms: Flowering plants that produce seeds enclosed in a fruit. Anthers: The boxlike structures at the top of stamens, where pollen is produced. Botanical garden: A place where plants are collected and displayed for scientific, educational and artistic purposes. Fertilization: The union of male sperm cells and female egg cells. Filament: The stalk of the stamen. Flower: The reproductive structure of an angiosperm. Fruit: A ripened ovary conaining seeds. Nectar: The sweet liquid produced by flowers to attract pollinators. Ovary: The hollow compartment at the base of the pistil which contains ovules. It develops into a fruit containing seeds. Ovules: The structures in a flower ovary that can develop into seeds. Pistil: The female part of a flower; stigma, style, and ovary. Pollen: A yellow, powder-like material containing sperm cells. Pollen tubes: Tubes that carry sperm cells from the stigma into the ovary. Pollination: The process of pollen coming together with the stigma of a flower. Pollinators: Animals which carry pollen from one flower to another. Seed: A structure containing a baby plant and its food supply, which is surrounded by a protective seed coat.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennials for Special Purposes
    Perennials for Special Purposes Hot & Dry Areas • Sage, Perennial (Artemisia) Newly planted perennials will need regular • Sea Holly (Eryngium) watering until established. • Sea Lavender (Limonium) • Spurge, Cushion (Euphorbia • Aster polychroma) • Baby’s Breath • Statice, German (Gypsophila) (Goniolimon) • Beardtongue • Stonecrop (Sedum) (Penstemon) • Sunflower, False (Heliopsis) • Big Bluestem • Sunflower, Perennial (Helianthus) (Andropogon) • Switch Grass (Panicum) • Bitterroot (Lewisia) • Tickseed (Coreopsis) • Blanketflower (Gaillardia) • Tufted Hair Grass (Deschampsia) • Blue Oat Grass (Helictotrichon) • Yarrow (Achillea) • Cactus, Prickly Pear (Opuntia) • Yucca • Candytuft (Iberis sempervirens) • Cinquefoil (Potentilla) Groundcover for Sun • Coneflower (Echinacea) • Daisy, Painted (Tanacetum) • Baby’s Breath, Creeping • Daisy, Shasta (Leucanthemum x superbum) (Gypsophila repens) • Daylily (Hemerocallis) • Beardtongue, Spreading • Evening Primrose (Oenothera) (Penstemon) • False Indigo (Baptisia) • Bellflower, Spreading • Feather Reed Grass (Calamagrostis) (Campanula) • Fescue, Blue (Festuca glauca) • Cinquefoil (Potentilla) • Flax (Linum) • Cliff Green (Paxistima • Foxtail Lily (Eremurus) canbyi) • Globe Thistle (Echinops) • Cranesbill (Geranium) • Goldenrod (Solidago) • Gentian, Trumpet (Gentiana acaulis) • Helen’s Flower (Helenium) • Globe Daisy (Globularia) • Hens & Chicks (Sempervivum) • Hens & Chicks (Sempervivum) • Ice Plant (Delosperma) • Irish/Scotch Moss (Sagina subulata) • Lamb’s Ears (Stachys byzantina) • Kinnikinnick
    [Show full text]
  • The Bitterroot Valley of Western Montana Area Economic Profile
    The Bitterroot Valley of Western Montana AREA ECONOMIC PROFILE prepared by Dr. Larry Swanson, Associate Directori O’Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West The University of Montana May, 2001 This profile provides a description and assessment of the area economy of the Bitterroot Valley of southwestern Montana. Changing conditions and trends in the area economy over the course of the last twenty to twenty-five years are examined, including trends in population and employment growth and associated income changes and economic restruc- turing. Changing conditions in Ravalli County and the Bitterroot Valley are compared to those for the larger Rocky Mountain West region and nation as a whole. Various measures of the Bitterroot area economy also are systematically compared to similar measures for areas throughout the western United States having similar characteristics to the Bitterroot Valley. Two types of “peer areas” are selected for this purpose: 1) non-metro areas in the West nearby small and intermediate regional centers of 30,000 to 100,000 people, and, 2) non-metro areas nearby small and intermediate regional centers that are also nearby large concentrations of Forest Service lands. Major Findings and Observations Southwestern Montana’s Bitterroot Valley is the central watershed of the Bitterroot River, which flows north through the valley toward its confluence with the Clark Fork River near Missoula. This 1. Population Growth - During the 1990s, Ravalli County was the fastest growing county watershed is largely defined by the boundaries of Ravalli County. County boundaries also define in Montana and became one of the fastest growing counties in the entire United States, the outer boundaries of the Bitterroot National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys
    Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys Five Valleys and Bitterroot Audubon Society Chapters are grassroots volunteer organizations of Montana Audubon and the National Audubon Society. We promote understanding, respect, and enjoyment of birds and the natural world through education, habitat protection, and environmental advocacy. Five Valleys Bitterroot Audubon Society Audubon Society P.O. Box 8425 P.O. Box 326 Missoula, MT 59807 Hamilton, MT 59840 www.fvaudubon.org/ www.bitterrootaudubonorg/ Montana Audubon P.O. Box 595 Helena, MT 59624 406-443-3949 www.mtaudubon.org Status W Sp Su F Bird Species of West-central Montana (most vagrants excluded) _ Harlequin Duck B r r r Relative abundance in suitable habitat by season are: _ Long-tailed Duck t r r c - common to abundant, usually found on every visit in _ Surf Scoter t r r r moderate to large numbers _ White-winged Scoter t r r r u - uncommon, usually present in low numbers but may be _ Common Goldeneye B c c c c _ missed Barrow’s Goldeneye B u c c c _ o - occasional, seen only a few times during the season, not Bufflehead B o c u c _ Hooded Merganser B o c c c present in all suitable habitat _ Common Merganser B c c c c r - rare, one to low numbers occur but not every year _ Red-breasted Merganser t o o _ Status: Ruddy Duck B c c c _ Osprey B c c c B - Direct evidence of breeding _ Bald Eagle B c c c c b - Indirect evidence of breeding _ Northern Harrier B u c c c t - No evidence of breeding _ Sharp-shinned Hawk B u u u u _ Cooper’s Hawk B u u u u Season of occurrence: _ Northern Goshawk B u u u u W - Winter, mid-November to mid-February _ Swainson’s Hawk B u u u Sp - Spring, mid-February to mid-May _ Red-tailed Hawk B c c c c Su - Summer, mid-May to mid-August _ Ferruginous Hawk t r r r F - Fall, mid-August to mid-November _ Rough-legged Hawk t c c c _ Golden Eagle B u u u u This list follows the seventh edition of the AOU check-list.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Wise and Native Plant Demonstration Garden
    LaBonte Park’s Outdoor Learning Center Water-Wise and Native Plant Demonstration Garden This collaborative effort was undertaken in fall 2007 to showcase the wide variety of water- wise plants that can be grown in Laramie. Most are also well-adapted to other locations in the state. These drought-tolerant species can be used in naturalistic settings or in more for- mal gardens. Either way, you’ll end up with a landscape that uses less water, takes up less of your time, and looks great! Updated 8/2012 N The north side of this garden is dedicated to plants that are native to our area including the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains re- gions. Note: This map will be revised every 2-3 years. It may not be to- tally accurate when you visit but it will be close. The south side con- tains water-wise plants from the Rocky Mountain region and beyond. Water-Wise Demo Bed List of Plants (listed by map number) PERENNIALS 84. Upright prairie coneflower (red-brown form) Ratibida columnifera 3. Wild four o'clock, Mirabilis multiflora 90. Sugarbowl clematis, Clematis scottii 4. Sunset penstemon, Penstemon clutei 93. Iris (intermediate size), Iris spp. 5. Basket of Gold, Aurinia saxatilis 94. Iris, Iris spp. 6. Lambs ear ('Silver Carpet'), Stachys byzantina 95. Firecracker penstemon, Penstemon eatonii 7. Dianthus ('Firewitch'), Dianthus gratianopolitanus 96. Partridge feather, Tanacetum densum ssp. 8. Rocky Mountain penstemon, Penstemon strictus amani 9. Small-leaf pussytoes ('McClintock'), Antennaria parvi- 97. Sedum (‘Angelina’), Sedum rupestre folia 98. Yarrow (‘Moonshine’), Achillea hybrid 10. Artemisia ('Silver Brocade'), Artemisia stelleriana 99.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan And
    Glossary accessible—Pertaining to physical access to areas and canopy—A layer of foliage, generally the uppermost activities for people of different abilities, especially layer, in a vegetative stand; midlevel or understory those with physical impairments. vegetation in multilayered stands. Canopy closure adaptive resource management—The rigorous appli­ (also canopy cover) is an estimate of the amount of cation of management, research, and monitoring overhead vegetative cover. to gain information and experience necessary to CCP—See comprehensive conservation plan. assess and modify management activities. It is a CFR—See Code of Federal Regulations. process that uses feedback from research, moni­ cfs—Cubic feet per second. toring, and evaluation of management actions to Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)—The codification of support or modify objectives and strategies at all the general and permanent rules published in the planning levels. It is also a process in which policy Federal Register by the executive departments and decisions are implemented within a framework of agencies of the Federal Government. Each volume scientifically driven experiments to test predictions of the CFR is updated once each calendar year. and assumptions inherent in management plans. compatibility determination—See compatible use. Analysis of results helps managers determine compatible use—A wildlife-dependent recreational use whether current management should continue as or any other use of a refuge that, in the sound pro­ is or whether it should be modified to achieve de­ fessional judgment of the director of the U.S. Fish sired conditions. and Wildlife Service, will not materially interfere Administration Act—National Wildlife Refuge System with or detract from the fulfillment of the mission Administration Act of 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Resources of the Bitterroot National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Resources Forest Service Rocky Mountain of the Bitterroot Research Station May 2000 National Forest Tracey S. Frescino Bitterroot National Forest Montana Idaho About the author __________________________ Tracey S. Frescino is a Forester with the Interior West Resource Inventory, Monitoring, and Evaluation Program, Rocky Mountain Research Station in Ogden, Utah. Contents __________________________________ Page What forest resources are found on the Bitterroot National Forest? ............ 1 How does the forest change? ................................................................................. 7 Other information about the forest land of the Bitterroot .............................. 8 How much forest land is suitable for timber production? ............................... 8 How was the inventory conducted? ................................................................... 10 Documentation ....................................................................................................... 13 For further information ......................................................................................... 13 Rocky Mountain Research Station 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 Forest Resources of the Bitterroot National Forest Tracey S. Frescino The Interior West Resource Inventory, Monitoring, single predominant species concept is in stands where and Evaluation (IWRIME) Program of the USDA Forest Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir occur together. If Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
    [Show full text]
  • Job Announcement Rangeland Management Specialist, GS 454-9/11
    Job Announcement Rangeland Management Specialist, GS 454-9/11 Region 4 Salmon‐Challis National Forest Lost River Ranger District The Lost River Ranger District is seeking candidates for a Rangeland Management Specialist position. This 800,000+ acre Ranger District has an extensive range program with all the excitement, challenges and gratification that goes along with managing grazing (both cattle and sheep) in some incredible country in south central Idaho. The duty station is Mackay, Idaho, a small town in the gorgeous Lost River Valley, settled between the Lost River and Pioneer Mountain ranges. Interested candidates should go to USAjobs and search for Announcement Number 15-0413-149835G-RCA This job is open from July 14 to July 24, 2015 The Forest will be offering up to $25,000 incentive bonus to the selected applicant with a requirement to stay in place for at least three years. For additional information contact Diane Weaver, District Ranger at 208‐588‐3400 or [email protected] Major Duties: The person selected will serve as the District range and weed program leader, supervising one GS 5/7/9 rangeland management specialist, one range technician and a varying seasonal workforce. They will have responsibility for overall management of 35 allotments, including permit administration and long‐term monitoring; overseeing completion of environmental analysis; implementing decisions regarding grazing authorizations; and coordinating with two counties and Cooperative Weed Management Areas. This position works closely with the fisheries and wildlife biologists, as well as other personnel on the District and across the Forest. This position will oversee an extensive monitoring program associated with grazing and ecosystem management.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton, a Legacy for the Bitterroot Valley. [An Historical Pageant- Drama of Hamilton, Mont.]
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1959 Hamilton, a legacy for the Bitterroot Valley. [An historical pageant- drama of Hamilton, Mont.] Donald William Butler The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Butler, Donald William, "Hamilton, a legacy for the Bitterroot Valley. [An historical pageant-drama of Hamilton, Mont.]" (1959). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2505. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2505 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HAMILTON A LEGACY FOR THE BITTERROOT VALLEY by DONALD WILLIAM BUTLER B.A. Montana State University, 1949 Presented in partial f-ulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1959 Approved by; / t*-v« ^—— Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School AUG 1 7 1959 Date UMI Number: EP34131 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT UMI EP34131 Copyright 2012 by ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Part of the Snake River Canyon and Adjacent Areas in Northeastern Oregon and Western Idaho
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Tracy Lowell Vallier for the Ph.D. in Geology (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date thesis is presented May 1, 1967 Title THE GEOLOGY OF PART OF THE SNAKE RIVER CANYON AND ADJACENT AREAS IN NORTHEAXERN OREGON AND WESTERN IDAHO Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy (Major professor) The mapped area lies between the Wallowa Mountains of northeastern Oregon and the Seven Devils Mountains of western Idaho. Part of the Snake River canyon is in- cluded. A composite stratigraphic section includes at least 30,000 feet of strata. Pre- Tertiary and Tertiary strata are separated by a profound unconformity. Pre -Tertiary layered rocks are mostly Permian and Triassic volcani- clastic and volcanic flow rocks. At least four pre -Ter- tiary intrusive suites occur. Tertiary rocks are Miocene and Pliocene plateau basalts. Quaternary glacial materi- als and stream deposits locally mantle the older rocks. Permian ( ?) rocks of the Windy Ridge Formation are the oldest rocks and consist of 2,000 to 3,000 feet of keratophyre, quartz keratophyre, and keratophric pyro- clastic rocks. Unconformably ( ?) overlying the Windy Ridge Formation are 8,000 to 10,000 feet of volcaniclastic rocks and minor volcanic flow rocks of the Hunsaker Creek Formation of Middle Permian (Leonardian and Wordian) age. Spilitic flow rocks of the Kleinschmidt Volcanics are interlayered with and in part overlie the Hunsaker Creek Formation and comprise a sequence about 2,000 to 3,000 feet thick. The Paleozoic layered rocks were intruded by the Holbrook - Irondyke intrusives, composed of keratophyre porphyry, quartz keratophyre porphyry, diabase, and gab- bro.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTREACH Region 4 Salmon Challis NF Lost River Ranger District
    OUTREACH District Range Technician, GS 455-6/7/8 Region 4 Salmon Challis NF Lost River Ranger District The Lost River Ranger District is seeking candidates for a Range Technician position. This 800,000+ acre Ranger District has an extensive range program with all the excitement, challenges and gratification that goes along with managing grazing (both cattle and sheep) in some incredible country in south central Idaho. The duty station is Mackay, Idaho; a small town in the gorgeous Lost River Valley, settled between the Lost River and Pioneer Mountain ranges. Interested candidates should contact Diane Weaver, District Ranger, Lost River Ranger District for more information. If you wish to be considered for this opportunity please complete the attached outreach form and send it to Diane Weaver at [email protected] by May 6, 2015. Major Duties: The person selected will be responsible for technical work in support of overall management of 35 allotments. Duties will include: inspect and document permittee compliance with range improvement maintenance and livestock distribution; data collection and monitoring annual forage use and impacts; inventory and treat noxious weeds; administer and maintain the district horse program; lead a monitoring and inventory seasonal crew (usually 2-3 students); input data in INFRA data base; and prepare environmental analysis documents for small range improvement projects. This person needs to be experienced with horses, ATVs, GPS, maps, driving in rugged conditions, have some basic botany skills, and able to work with a crew or independently in the field. Salmon-Challis National Forest The Salmon-Challis National Forest covers over 4.3 million acres in east-central Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Seen Plants
    Commonly Seen Plants Compiled by Doug Owen, Common name Scientific name Family Park Naturalist Arrow-Leaved Balsamroot Balsamorhiza sagittata Sunflower yellow flowers Hawksbeard Crepis (3 species) Sunflower Mountain Dandelion Agoseris glauca Sunflower Salsify Tragopogon dubius Sunflower Groundsel Senecio (5 species) Sunflower Buckwheats Erigonum (11 species) Buckwheat Desert Parsley Cymopterus terebinthinus Carrot Gland Cinquefoil Potentilla glanulosa Rose Leopard Lily Fritillaria atropurpurea Lily Wayside Gromwell Lithospermum ruderale Borage Hairy Golden-Aster Heterotheca villosa Sunflower Sukdorf’s Monkeyflower Mimulus suksdorfii Snapdragon White Stem Stickleaf Mentzelia dispersa Loasa Yellow Wood Violet Viola orbiculata Violet Blazingstar Mentzelia laevicaulis Loasa Prickly Pear cactus Opuntia polyacantha Cactus Mullein Verbascum thapsus Snapdragon red / purple / blue flowers Indian Paintbrush Castilleja chromosa Snapdragon Dwarf Monkeyflower Mimulus nanus Snapdragon Wild Onion Allium (8 species) Lily Scarlet Gilia Gilia aggregata Phlox Wire Lettuce Stephanomeria tenuifolia Sunflower Joe Pye Weed Eupatorium occidentale Sunflower Hoary Aster Machaeranthera canescens Sunflower Fernleaf Fleabane Erigeron compositus Sunflower Blue Penstemon Penstemon cyaneus Snapdragon Lupine Lupinus (4 species) Pea Anderson Larkspur Delpinium andersonii Buttercup Scorpionweed Phacelia hastata Waterleaf Blue-eyed Mary Collinsia parviplora Snapdragon Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium Primrose Spiney Skeleton Plant Stephanomeria spinosa Sunflower Common name
    [Show full text]