Ligand-Activated Retinoic Acid Receptor Inhibits AP-1 Transactivation by Disrupting C-Jun/C-Fos Dimerization
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ligand-Activated Retinoic Acid Receptor Inhibits AP-1 Transactivation by Disrupting c-Jun/c-Fos Dimerization Xiao-Feng Zhou, Xi-Qiang Shen, and Lirim Shemshedini Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mend/article/13/2/276/2741651 by guest on 27 September 2021 Department of Biology University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio 43606 In the presence of retinoic acid (RA), the retinoid volved in epithelial differentiation (2), has a central role receptors, retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid as a tissue-specific morphogen during embryogenesis X receptor (RXR), are able to up-regulate transcrip- (3), and represses malignant transformation of epithe- tion directly by binding to RA-responsive elements lial cells both in vitro (4) and in vivo (5). These diverse on the promoters of responsive genes. Liganded and pleiotropic effects of RA are mediated through the RARs and RXRs are also capable of down-regulat- binding of RA to a family of nuclear receptors, which, ing transcription, but, by contrast, this is an indi- together with the receptors for steroid and thyroid rect effect, mediated by the interaction of these hormones and vitamin D, form the nuclear receptor nuclear receptors not with DNA but the transcrip- superfamily (reviewed in Refs. 6–10). Nuclear recep- tion factor activating protein-1 (AP-1). AP-1 is a tors comprise the largest family of transcription fac- dimeric complex of the protooncoproteins c-Jun tors, which, upon binding of their cognate ligands, and c-Fos and directly regulates transcription of modulate transcription initiated from promoters of tar- genes important for cellular growth. Previous in get genes by interacting with specific cis-acting, DNA vitro results have suggested that RARs can block response elements. AP-1 DNA binding. Using a mammalian two-hybrid In contrast to this positive effect of nuclear recep- system, we report here that human RARa (hRARa) tors on transcription, which requires receptor-DNA in- can disrupt in a RA-dependent manner the homo- teractions, the retinoid receptors and other nuclear and heterodimerization properties of c-Jun and c- receptors can negatively affect gene expression with- Fos. This inhibition of dimerization is cell specific, out binding to DNA, via their ability to functionally occurring only in those cells that exhibit RA- interact with the transcription factor AP-1 (activating induced repression of AP-1 transcriptional activity. protein-1) (reviewed in Refs. 11–14). AP-1 consists of Furthermore, this mechanism appears to be spe- homodimers and heterodimers of Jun (c-Jun, v-Jun, cific for the RARs, since another potent inhibitor of JunB, and JunD), Fos (c-Fos, v-Fos, FosB, Fra1, and AP-1 activity, the glucocorticoid receptor, does not Fra2), or activating transcription factor (ATF2, ATF3/ affect AP-1 dimerization. Our data argue for a novel LRF1, B-ATF) bZIP (basic region leucine zipper) pro- mechanism by which RARs can repress AP-1 DNA teins (15–17). The transcription of the c-jun and c-fos binding, in which liganded RARs are able to inter- genes, encoding the major components of AP-1, is fere with c-Jun/c-Jun homodimerization and rapidly induced upon stimulation of cellular prolifera- c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimerization and, in this way, tion (37, 38). Like nuclear receptors, AP-1 activates may prevent the formation of AP-1 complexes ca- transcription of target genes by binding to specific pable of DNA binding. (Molecular Endocrinology promoter elements, called TREs (TPA-responsive ele- 13: 276–285, 1999) ments) (17, 18). TPA (12-O-tetra-decanoyl-phorbol- 13-acetate) is a tumor promoter that induces the ex- pression of the c-fos and c-jun genes (19, 20) and INTRODUCTION thereby indirectly stimulates the expression of AP-1 target genes. Retinoic acid (RA), the most biologically active natural Both positive and negative regulatory interactions metabolite of vitamin A (retinol), exerts profound ef- between nuclear receptors and c-Jun/c-Fos have fects on vertebrate development, cellular differentia- been reported (reviewed in Refs. 11–14). The first re- tion, and homeostasis (reviewed in Ref. 1). RA is in- sults showed an inhibition of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-induced transcription by either c-Fos or c-Jun 0888-8809/99/$3.00/0 (21–24). We (25) and others (26–31) have shown that Molecular Endocrinology Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society this type of interference is not restricted to the GR, but 276 RAR Blocks c-Jun/c-Fos Dimerization 277 seems to be a common characteristic of nuclear re- Using a mammalian two-hybrid system, we provide ceptors, including the receptors for the hormones pro- evidence here that RAR, but not GR, is able to disrupt gesterone (PR), estrogen (ER), androgen (AR), and thy- in vivo c-Jun/c-Fos dimerization in a ligand-dependent roid (TRs), and the RA (RARs, RXRs). Conversely, the manner. This effect is not only receptor specific, but activation of the collagenase and stromelysin genes by also cell specific, paralleling what has been reported AP-1 is repressed in a ligand-dependent manner by previously with RA-induced inhibition of AP-1 tran- several receptors, including GR (21–24), PR (25), AR scriptional activity (27). Our results suggest that c-Jun/ (25), ER (25), TR (28), and RARs/RXRs (26, 27, 29). By c-Fos dimerization may be a third target of nuclear contrast, coexpression of c-Jun, c-Fos, and ER receptor-mediated repression of AP-1 that may be causes synergistic activation of the ovalbumin gene specific for the transrepression activity of RARs and (32). GR has been shown to potentiate c-Jun-acti- may partially explain the receptor- and cell-specific Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mend/article/13/2/276/2741651 by guest on 27 September 2021 vated transcription from the proliferin- regulatory ele- nature of this repression. ment (33). Similarly, transfected c-Jun enhances AR- induced transactivation, but it does so independently of promoter or cell type specificity (25, 34, 35). RESULTS In contrast to the interaction between AP-1 and AR, PR, or GR, which is nonmutual and can be either RA-Bound human RARa (hRARa) Inhibits AP-1 negative or positive (25, 32, 33), the interaction be- Activity in a Cell-Specific Manner tween AP-1 and the retinoid receptors is mutual and solely inhibitory. c-Jun and c-Fos, either individually or The interaction between nuclear receptors and AP-1 together, have been shown to repress the transcrip- has been shown previously to be dependent on cell tional activity of RAR and/or RXR (27). Conversely, type (Refs. 25 and 27; reviewed in Ref. 11). To test for both RAR/RXR heterodimers or homodimers of either cell specificity in RARs’ ability to inhibit AP-1 transcrip- can inhibit AP-1 transactivation of several AP-1- tional activity, cells were transiently transfected with a responsive promoters (27, 29). Indeed, the RAR/RXR expression plasmids for c-Jun and hRAR and the antagonism of AP-1 has been directly implicated in the AP-1-inducible reporter TRE-tk-CAT (34). In keeping a regulation of collagenase (27, 29) and stromelysin (26), with previously published data (27), hRAR inhibited in two genes that play key roles in tumor potential and a ligand- and dose-dependent manner exogenous c- invasiveness. Jun activity in HeLa cells (Fig. 1A), but not in Cos cells While the molecular bases of these diverse regula- (Fig. 1B). The same difference in activity was observed tory interactions between nuclear receptors and AP-1 on endogenous AP-1 activity (data not shown). are not known, recent studies provide several attrac- Mammalian Two-Hybrid System Can Be Used to tive models. Based on the demonstration that CREB- Measure c-Jun/c-Fos Dimerization in Vivo binding protein (CBP) and the related p300 can act as transcriptional coactivators for both nuclear receptors The yeast two-hybrid system has been used previ- (36–38) and AP-1 (39, 40), it has been proposed that ously to measure in vivo protein-protein interactions the nuclear receptor-AP-1 antagonism depends on (45). In the current study, we have used a similar competition for limiting amounts of these two coacti- system to measure c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimerization vator proteins (36). While this model may explain some and c-Jun/c-Jun homodimerization in cultured mam- of the observations made, it is not able to explain all of malian cells. In our system, two fusion proteins are the cell, promoter, and receptor specificity that has expressed, one containing the GAL4 DNA-binding do- been observed in the nuclear receptor-AP-1 interac- main (DBD) fused to either full-length c-Jun or only its tions (25). More recently, it has been suggested that bZIP region and the other containing the VP16 trans- GR, RARs, and TRs can block AP-1 activity by inhib- activation domain fused to either full-length c-Fos or iting the activity of Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) only its bZIP region (Fig. 2A). HeLa cells were trans- (41), which enhances c-Jun transcriptional activity by fected with expression plasmids for these different phosphorylating Ser63/73 (42, 43). However, this fusion proteins, and dimerization was monitored with model also is unable to account for the diverse nature the GAL4-inducible reporter 17M-tk-CAT. While GAL- of the interactions between nuclear receptors and cJun had a weak activity and VP16-cFos had no mea- AP-1. Others have argued, based on in vitro results, surable activity, these two fusion proteins together that AP-1 and receptors mutually inhibit each other’s resulted in a 14-fold stimulation in transcription (Fig. DNA-binding ability (21, 24, 33).