DOCSLIB.ORG

Contrasting Theories of Life: Historical Context, Current Theories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contrasting Theories of Life: Historical Context, Current Theories BioSystems 188 (2020) 104063 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect BioSystems journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biosystems Review article Contrasting theories of life: Historical context, current theories. In search of an ideal theory Athel Cornish-Bowden <, María Luz Cárdenas Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, BIP, IMM, Marseille, France ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Most attempts to define life have concentrated on individual theories, mentioning others hardly at all, but here Autocatalytic sets we compare all of the major current theories. We begin by asking how we know that an entity is alive, and Autopoiesis continue by describing the contributions of La Mettrie, Burke, Leduc, Herrera, Bahadur, D'Arcy Thompson and, Chemoton especially, Schrödinger, whose book What is Life? is a vital starting point. We then briefly describe and discuss Closure (M, R) systems, the hypercycle, the chemoton, autopoiesis and autocatalytic sets. All of these incorporate the Hypercycle Metabolic circularity idea of circularity to some extent, but all of them fail to take account of mechanisms of metabolic regulation, (M, R) systems which we regard as crucial if an organism is to avoid collapsing into a mass of unregulated reactions. In Origin of life a final section we study the extent to which each of the current theories can aid in the search for a more Self-organization complete theory of life, and explain the characteristics of metabolic control analysis that make it essential for an adequate understanding of organisms. Contents 1. General introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Definitions of life ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. The living state ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Why does it matter? ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Origin of life.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.5. La Mettrie (1748): Man a Machine ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6. Obsolete theories.................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6.1. Vitalism................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6.2. Spontaneous generation ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.6.3. Creationism ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.7. Final cause ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.8. Nineteenth century ................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.9. Creating lifelike particles ........................................................................................................................................................................ 9 1.9.1. John Burke (1906) ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9.2. Stéphane Leduc (1910, 1912).................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9.3. Alfonso Herrera (1904, 1924).................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9.4. Krishna Bahadur (1950s) .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.10. Physical and mechanical constraints ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 1.11. Erwin Schrödinger (1944) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.11.1. Negative entropy, codescript ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 1.11.2. Biology and the laws of physics................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.12. Theories of life and molecular biology ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.13. Is it possible to define ``life''? .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 2. Current theories of life ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1. General points........................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.1. Closure.................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2. Lack of communication between authors.................................................................................................................................... 14 < Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (A. Cornish-Bowden), [email protected], [email protected] (M.L. Cárdenas). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2019.104063 Received 4 June 2019; Received in revised form 10 October 2019; Accepted 10 October 2019 Available online 9 November 2019 0303-2647/' 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. A. Cornish-Bowden and M.L. Cárdenas BioSystems 188 (2020) 104063 2.2. (M, R) systems (1958 onwards) ............................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1. Infinite regress ......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2. Closure to efficient causation .................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.3. Modelling and simulation.......................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.4. Membranes and barriers ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.5. Enzymes and metabolites .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.6. Anticipatory systems................................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3. The hypercycle (1971 onwards)............................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1. Eigen's (Woese's) paradox ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.2. The RNA world ........................................................................................................................................................................ 19 2.3.3. The hypercycle......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.4. Quasi-species ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prebiological Evolution and the Metabolic Origins of Life
    Prebiological Evolution and the Andrew J. Pratt* Metabolic Origins of Life University of Canterbury Keywords Abiogenesis, origin of life, metabolism, hydrothermal, iron Abstract The chemoton model of cells posits three subsystems: metabolism, compartmentalization, and information. A specific model for the prebiological evolution of a reproducing system with rudimentary versions of these three interdependent subsystems is presented. This is based on the initial emergence and reproduction of autocatalytic networks in hydrothermal microcompartments containing iron sulfide. The driving force for life was catalysis of the dissipation of the intrinsic redox gradient of the planet. The codependence of life on iron and phosphate provides chemical constraints on the ordering of prebiological evolution. The initial protometabolism was based on positive feedback loops associated with in situ carbon fixation in which the initial protometabolites modified the catalytic capacity and mobility of metal-based catalysts, especially iron-sulfur centers. A number of selection mechanisms, including catalytic efficiency and specificity, hydrolytic stability, and selective solubilization, are proposed as key determinants for autocatalytic reproduction exploited in protometabolic evolution. This evolutionary process led from autocatalytic networks within preexisting compartments to discrete, reproducing, mobile vesicular protocells with the capacity to use soluble sugar phosphates and hence the opportunity to develop nucleic acids. Fidelity of information transfer in the reproduction of these increasingly complex autocatalytic networks is a key selection pressure in prebiological evolution that eventually leads to the selection of nucleic acids as a digital information subsystem and hence the emergence of fully functional chemotons capable of Darwinian evolution. 1 Introduction: Chemoton Subsystems and Evolutionary Pathways Living cells are autocatalytic entities that harness redox energy via the selective catalysis of biochemical transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Regarding Belief in Primordial Soup to Explain the Origin of Life
    Regarding Belief in Primordial Soup to explain the Origin of Life Belief in a primordial soup where life might spontaneously evolve is as wrong as believing the earth is flat, or, as Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (1981) suggest, as wrong as believing that the pre-Copernican idea that the earth is the center of the universe. They state, “It will be no bad thing to abandon this position” (p. 138). The belief in primordial soup goes something like this: “Somehow a brew of appropriate chemicals managed to get together, the organic soup, and somehow the chemicals managed to shuffle themselves into an early primitive life-form. From then on, all appeared to be plain-sailing, natural selection operating on randomly generated mutations would do the rest” (p. 131). Today we know that life does not arise spontaneously. In the 1860s, Louis Pasteur demonstrated that “the concept of spontaneous generation” was incorrect using “carefully designed experiments” (p. 36). Yet many biologists still “believe that life started on Earth through spontaneous processes” (p. 37). “The recourse to an organic soup to cross this biggest hurdle is evidently a blatant recourse to the spontaneous generation theory which Pasteur claimed to have destroyed. Nevertheless, most scientists, even to this day, have been satisfied to accept it” (p. 37). What scientific tests did Louis Pasteur conduct about spontaneous generation of life? How did he set up his experiment? What were his steps? What was his result? _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Synthesis: Handout 1
    Prof Tim Donohoe: Strategies and Taccs in Organic Synthesis: Handout 1 Organic Synthesis III 8 x 1hr Lectures: Michaelmas Term Weeks 5-8 2016 Mon at 10am; Wed at 9am Dyson Perrins lecture theatre Copies of this handout will be available at hEp://donohoe.chem.ox.ac.uk/page16/index.html 1/33 Prof Tim Donohoe: Strategies and Taccs in Organic Synthesis: Handout 1 Organic Synthesis III Synopsis 1) Introduc5on to synthesis: (i) Why do we want to synthesise molecules- what sort of molecules do we need to make? (ii) What aspects of selecvity do we need to accomplish a good synthesis (chemo-, regio- and stereoselecvity)? (iii) Protecng group chemistry is central to any syntheAc effort (examples and principles) (iv) What is the perfect synthesis (performed in industry versus academia)? 2) The chiral pool: where does absolute stereochemistry come from? 3) Retrosynthesis- learning to think backwards (revision from first and second year). Importance of making C-C bonds and controlling oxidaAon state. Umpolung 4) Some problems to think about 5) Examples of retrosynthesis/synthesis in ac5on. 6) Ten handy hints for retrosynthesis 7) Soluons to the problems Recommended books: General: Organic Chemistry (Warren et al) Organic Synthesis: The DisconnecRon Approach (S. Warren) Classics in Total Synthesis Volumes I and II (K. C. Nicolaou) The Logic of Chemical Synthesis (E. J. Corey) 2/33 View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue 619461 Strychniqae and BYucine. Pavt XLII. 903 Prof Tim Donohoe: Strategies and Taccs in Organic Synthesis: Handout 1 (i) Why do we want to synthesise complex molecules? Isolated from the Pacific Yew in 1962 Prescribed for prostate, breast and ovarian cancer Unique mode of acRon 1x 100 year old tree = 300 mg Taxol Isolated in 1818- poisonous Stuctural elucidaon took R.
    [Show full text]
  • Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (-)-Deoxoapodine
    Enantioselective total synthesis of (-)-deoxoapodine The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Kang, Taek, et al., "Enantioselective total synthesis of (-)- deoxoapodine." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 56, 44 (Sept. 2017): p. 13857-60 doi 10.1002/anie.201708088 ©2017 Author(s) As Published 10.1002/anie.201708088 Publisher Wiley Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125957 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Angew Manuscript Author Chem Int Ed Engl Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 October 23. Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 October 23; 56(44): 13857–13860. doi:10.1002/anie.201708088. Enantioselective Total Synthesis of (−)-Deoxoapodine Dr. Taek Kang§,a, Dr. Kolby L. White§,a, Tyler J. Mannb, Prof. Dr. Amir H. Hoveydab, and Prof. Dr. Mohammad Movassaghia aDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 (USA) bDepartment of Chemistry, Merkert Chemistry Center, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 (USA) Abstract The first enantioselective total synthesis of (−)-deoxoapodine is described. Our synthesis of this hexacyclic aspidosperma alkaloid includes an efficient molybdenum-catalyzed enantioselective ring-closing metathesis reaction for desymmetrization of an advanced intermediate that introduces the C5-quaternary stereocenter. After C21-oxygenation, the pentacyclic core was accessed via an electrophilic C19-amide activation and transannular spirocyclization. A biogenetically inspired dehydrative C6-etherification reaction proved highly effective to secure the F-ring and the fourth contiguous stereocenter of (−)-deoxoapodine with complete stereochemical control.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Peptide Bond Types in Human Proteome Indicates How
    ics om & B te i ro o P in f f o o r l m Nahalka, J Proteomics Bioinform 2011, 4:8 a Journal of a n t r i c u s DOI: 10.4172/jpb.1000184 o J ISSN: 0974-276X Proteomics & Bioinformatics Research Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Quantification of Peptide Bond Types in Human Proteome Indicates How DNA Codons were Assembled at Prebiotic Conditions Jozef Nahalka1,2* 1Institute of Chemistry, Center for Glycomics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84538 Bratislava, Slovak Republic 2Institute of Chemistry, Center of excellence for white-green biotechnology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Trieda Andreja Hlinku 2, SK-94976 Nitra, Slovak Republic Abstract [GADV]-protein world hypothesis [1] leaded me to quantification of decapeptides assembled from G, A, V, D in human proteome. The G, A, V, and D amino acids were related to the nucleotides Guanine (g), Cystosine (c), Uracil (u), and Adenine (a). The search revealed agreement with the genetic code. The types of prebiotic peptide bonds represent probably the first selection power that established the base order in the codons. The genetic code underwent three phases of formation, which explain why modern codons have their particular order of nucleotides: the monobase, dibase and the modern phase (tribase). Sequence alignments and 3D structures of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases confirm the depicted picture of “relatedness” and the picture indicates how “relatedness” is used by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for navigation into and within of the C-terminal anticodon-binding domain. The findings presented here illustrate the novel concept of possible translation of the amino acid sequence into a nucleotide sequence that can be in interactive or contrary mode regarding to desired protein-RNA interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Cell Research As a Field That Connects Chemical, Biological and Philosophical Questions
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Artificial cell research as a field that connects chemical, biological and philosophical questions Deplazes-Zemp, Anna Abstract: This review article discusses the interdisciplinary nature and implications of artificial cell research. It starts from two historical theories: Gánti’s chemoton model and the autopoiesis theory by Maturana and Varela. They both explain the transition from chemical molecules to biological cells. These models exemplify two different ways in which disciplines of chemistry, biology and philosophy canprofit from each other. In the chemoton model, conclusions from one disciplinary approach are relevant for the other disciplines. In contrast, the autopoiesis model itself (rather than its conclusions) is transferred from one discipline to the other. The article closes by underpinning the relevance of artificial cell research for philosophy with reference to the on-going philosophical debates on emergence, biological functions and biocentrism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2016.443 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-135057 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Deplazes-Zemp, Anna (2016). Artificial cell research as a field that connects chemical, biological and philosophical questions. CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry, 70(6):443-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2016.443 NCCR MoleCulaR SySteMS eNgiNeeRiNg CHIMIA 2016, 70, No. 6 443 doi:10.2533/chimia.2016.443 Chimia 70 (2016) 443–448 © Swiss Chemical Society Artificial Cell Research as a Field that Connects Chemical, Biological and Philosophical Questions Anna Deplazes-Zemp* Abstract: This review article discusses the interdisciplinary nature and implications of artificial cell research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Total Synthesis of Securinine and Other Methodology Studies
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 2010 The total synthesis of securinine and other methodology studies Bhartesh Dhudshia University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Dhudshia, Bhartesh, "The total synthesis of securinine and other methodology studies" (2010). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 8275. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/8275 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. The Total Synthesis of Securinine and Other Methodology Studies by Bhartesh Dhudshia A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • SCHUSTER, PETER, University of Vienna Full Professor Of
    SCHUSTER, PETER, University of Vienna Ph.D. (chemistry and physics with honors), University of Vienna, 1967. Postdoctoral Fellow, Max- Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, 1968-1970. ‘Habilitation’ in Theoretical Chemistry, 1971. Full Professor of Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, 1973-; Head of the Institute of Theoretical Chemistry, 1973-1991 and 1996-2010. Head of the Computer Center of the University of Vienna, 1985-1991. External Faculty Member of the Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe (NM), 1991-2003 and 2004-. Founding Director of the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Jena (Germany), 1991- 1995. External Member of the Faculty for Biology and Pharmacy at the Friedrich-Schiller- University, Jena (Germany), 1995-. Memberships: Austrian Academy of Sciences (Fellow 1984, Vice President 2000-2003, President 2006-2009, Academy Council, 2011-), Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (Fellow 1993, Member of the Presidium 2001-2006), Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Fellow 1994), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Fellow 1995), Nordrhein-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Fellow 1999), National Academy of Sciences, USA (Foreign Associate 2009), Academia Europaea London (Fellow 2009), EMBO (Member 2014). Recipient: Erwin Schrödinger Award 1983, Österreichisches Ehrenzeichen für Wissenschaft und Kunst 1993, Phillip Morris Research Award 1995, Josef Loschmidt Medal 1995, Science Award of the City of Vienna, 1997, Kardinal Innitzer Award, 1997, Wilhelm Exner Medal 1999, Gr.Silbernes Ehrenzeichen für Verdienste um die Stadt Wien, 2009. Peter Schuster’s early work deals with the theory and structural properties of intermolecular complexes. He presented computational evidence for different geometries of normal, strong, and solid state hydrogen bonds. Merging chemical reaction kinetics with molecular biological evolution led to the development, together with Manfred Eigen, of concepts such as molecular quasispecies and catalytic hypercycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Advances in Total Synthesis Via Metathesis Reactions
    SYNTHESIS0039-78811437-210X © Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York 2018, 50, 3749–3786 review 3749 en Syn thesis I. Cheng-Sánchez, F. Sarabia Review Recent Advances in Total Synthesis via Metathesis Reactions Iván Cheng-Sánchez Francisco Sarabia* Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos s/n. 29071- Málaga, Spain [email protected] Received: 16.04.2018 ly explained by the emergence, design, and development of Accepted after revision: 30.05.2018 powerful catalysts that are capable of promoting striking Published online: 18.07.2018 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1610206; Art ID: ss-2018-z0262-r transformations in highly efficient and selective fashions. In fact, the ability of many of them to forge C–C bonds be- Abstract The metathesis reactions, in their various versions, have be- tween or within highly functionalized and sensitive com- come a powerful and extremely valuable tool for the formation of car- pounds has allowed for the preparation of complex frame- bon–carbon bonds in organic synthesis. The plethora of available cata- lysts to perform these reactions, combined with the various works, whose access were previously hampered by the lim- transformations that can be accomplished, have positioned the me- itations of conventional synthetic methods. Among the tathesis processes as one of the most important reactions of this centu- myriad of recent catalysts, those developed and designed to ry. In this review, we highlight the most relevant synthetic contributions promote metathesis reactions have had a profound impact published between 2012 and early 2018 in the field of total synthesis, reflecting the state of the art of this chemistry and demonstrating the and created a real revolution in the field of total synthesis, significant synthetic potential of these methodologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Life in the Universe Zackary Johnson
    11/4/2007 Origins of Life in the Universe Zackary Johnson OCN201 Fall 2007 [email protected] Zackary Johnson http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanography/zij/education.html Uniiiversity of Hawaii Department of Oceanography Class Schedule Nov‐2Originsof Life and the Universe Nov‐5 Classification of Life Nov‐7 Primary Production Nov‐9Consumers Nov‐14 Evolution: Processes (Steward) Nov‐16 Evolution: Adaptation() (Steward) Nov‐19 Marine Microbiology Nov‐21 Benthic Communities Nov‐26 Whale Falls (Smith) Nov‐28 The Marine Food Web Nov‐30 Community Ecology Dec‐3 Fisheries Dec‐5Global Ecology Dec‐12 Final Major Concepts TIMETABLE Big Bang! • Life started early, but not at the beginning, of Earth’s Milky Way (and other galaxies formed) history • Abiogenesis is the leading hypothesis to explain the beginning of life on Earth • There are many competing theories as to how this happened • Some of the details have been worked out, but most Formation of Earth have not • Abiogenesis almost certainly occurred in the ocean 20‐15 15‐94.5Today Billions of Years Before Present 1 11/4/2007 Building Blocks TIMETABLE Big Bang! • Universe is mostly hydrogen (H) and helium (He); for Milky Way (and other galaxies formed) example –the sun is 70% H, 28% He and 2% all else! Abundance) e • Most elements of interest to biology (C, N, P, O, etc.) were (Relativ 10 produced via nuclear fusion Formation of Earth Log at very high temperature reactions in large stars after Big Bang 20‐13 13‐94.7Today Atomic Number Billions of Years Before Present ORIGIN OF LIFE ON EARTH Abiogenesis: 3 stages Divine Creation 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Life
    Origin of life An explanation of what is needed for abiogenesis (or biopoiesis) Don Batten Introduction The origin of life is also known as abiogenesis or sometimes chemical evolution. Life is based on long information-rich molecules such as DNA and RNA that contain instructions for making proteins, upon which life depends. But the reading of the DNA/RNA to make proteins, and the replication of DNA or RNA to make new cells (reproduction, the mark of ‘life’) both depend on a large suite of proteins that are coded on the DNA/RNA. Both the DNA/RNA and the proteins need to be present at the same time for life to begin—a serious chicken-and-egg conundrum. Thus, the origin of life is a vexing problem for those who insist that life arose through purely natural processes (physics and chemistry alone). Some evolutionists claim that the origin of life is not a part of evolution. However, probably every evolutionary biology textbook has a section on the origin of life in the chapters on evolution. The University of California, Berkeley, has the origin of life included in their ‘Evolution 101’ course, in a section titled “From Soup to Cells—the Origin of Life”.1High-profile defenders of ‘all-things- evolutionary’, such as P.Z. Myers and Nick Matzke, agree that the origin of life is part of evolution, as does Richard Dawkins.2 A well-known evolutionist of the past, G.A. Kerkut, did make a distinction between the General Theory of Evolution (GTE), which included the origin of life, and the Special Theory of Evolution (STE) that only dealt with the diversification of life (the supposed topic of Darwin’s 1859 book).3 It is only recently that some defenders of evolution have tried to divorce the origin of life from consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • From L'homme Machine to Metabolic Closure Steps Towards
    Journal of Theoretical Biology 286 (2011) 100–113 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Theoretical Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yjtbi 50th Anniversary Year Review From L’Homme Machine to metabolic closure: Steps towards understanding life Juan-Carlos Letelier a, Marı´a Luz Ca´rdenas b, Athel Cornish-Bowden b,Ã a Departamento de Biologı´a, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile b Unite´ de Bioe´nerge´tique et Inge´nierie des Prote´ines, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 31 chemin Joseph-Aiguier, 13402 Marseille Cedex 20, France article info abstract Available online 12 July 2011 The nature of life has been a topic of interest from the earliest of times, and efforts to explain it in Keywords: mechanistic terms date at least from the 18th century. However, the impressive development of Origin of life molecular biology since the 1950s has tended to have the question put on one side while biologists (M,R) systems explore mechanisms in greater and greater detail, with the result that studies of life as such have been Autopoiesis confined to a rather small group of researchers who have ignored one another’s work almost Chemoton completely, often using quite different terminology to present very similar ideas. Central among these Self-organization ideas is that of closure, which implies that all of the catalysts needed for an organism to stay alive must be produced by the organism itself, relying on nothing apart from food (and hence chemical energy) from outside. The theories that embody this idea to a greater or less degree are known by a variety of names, including (M,R) systems, autopoiesis, the chemoton, the hypercycle, symbiosis, autocatalytic sets, sysers and RAF sets.
    [Show full text]