“Penikese Offers You the Choice Between Two Worlds. One Is a Place Where You Can Always Find Someone Other Than Yourself to Blame for Your Troubles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Modeling Population Dynamics of Roseate Terns (Sterna Dougallii) In
Ecological Modelling 368 (2018) 298–311 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecological Modelling j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel Modeling population dynamics of roseate terns (Sterna dougallii) in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean a,b,c,∗ d e b Manuel García-Quismondo , Ian C.T. Nisbet , Carolyn Mostello , J. Michael Reed a Research Group on Natural Computing, University of Sevilla, ETS Ingeniería Informática, Av. Reina Mercedes, s/n, Sevilla 41012, Spain b Dept. of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA c Darrin Fresh Water Institute, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, 307 MRC, Troy, NY 12180, USA d I.C.T. Nisbet & Company, 150 Alder Lane, North Falmouth, MA 02556, USA e Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, 1 Rabbit Hill Road, Westborough, MA 01581, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The endangered population of roseate terns (Sterna dougallii) in the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean consists Received 12 September 2017 of a network of large and small breeding colonies on islands. This type of fragmented population poses an Received in revised form 5 December 2017 exceptional opportunity to investigate dispersal, a mechanism that is fundamental in population dynam- Accepted 6 December 2017 ics and is crucial to understand the spatio-temporal and genetic structure of animal populations. Dispersal is difficult to study because it requires concurrent data compilation at multiple sites. Models of popula- Keywords: tion dynamics in birds that focus on dispersal and include a large number of breeding sites are rare in Roseate terns literature. -
Winter / Spring 2007
FOLLOWING SEASEA 2005-2006 Annual Report Issue Winter/Spring 2007 sea at thirty-five TABLETABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS Winter/Spring 2007 Cover Story SEA at Thirty-five SEA celebrates its 35th Anniversary year . .1 Features Ann Wickes Brewer A tribute to a SEA trustee emeritus . .4 Heading for a ‘roasted world’ John Bullard’s Boston Globe editorial . .9 In Every Issue Passages Events and news of general interest . .8 Scuttlebutt Alumni news from around the world . .10 Science Corner The evolution of oceanographic equipment . .26 Currents Mariah Klingsmith and Jarod Maggio (C-187) volunteer for the Peace Corps in the Philippines . .28 Special Report 2005-2006 Report to Donors From the desk of Board Chair, Linda Cox Maguire . .14 Annual Report . .15 Following SEA Winter/Spring 2007 Editor: Jan Wagner Cover Design: Lori Dolby Design: MBDesign Photography: Sandie Allen, Laurie Bullard, courtesy Colgate University, Mariah Klingsmith, Jarod Maggio, Amy Radar, courtesy Sparkman & Stephens, Jan Wagner, Become an alumni enrollment volunteer! For more information, Jim Watters, Laurie Weitzen contact Laurie Weitzen at (800) 552-3633, ext. 12 or [email protected] Following SEA is available online. If you’d like your prints, slides, or digital images considered for the next issue contact: Kerry Sullivan, ext. 20 or [email protected]. Sea Education Association, Inc., PO Box 6, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 Phone 800-552-3633 Fax 508-457-4673 www.sea.edu Recycled Chlorine-Free Paper / Soy Ink captains October 1982 4 sea A lesson in determinationat thirty-five The story of SEA’s founding and the early years of struggle to gain a pathway to success is a lesson in determination on the part of Corwith Cramer, Jr. -
The Census Man Cometh
THE CENSUS MAN COMETH - FOR SEAGULLS AND SUNDRY OTHER FOWL OF THE SEA AND SHORE by Bradford G. Blodget, State Ornithologist, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife A question I am frequently asked goes something like this; "Vfhat does the State Ornithologist do?" Actually, the greatest amount of my time and effort is spent collecting information and keeping tabs on the approximately 210 species of birds, particularly the rarer ones, that nest in Massachusetts. With this intelligence, effective recommenda tions can be made for their conservation, and I can answer other fre quent queries like, "Where have all the bluebirds gone?" While various specialized investigations and censuses of the state's avifauna are routinely handled, 1984 turned out to be anything but rou tine. One morning last spring, Ralph Andrews, a coastal bird special ist for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), telephoned me to announce that the service was undertaking a colonial waterbird census along the Atlantic seaboard from Maine to Virginia to update a census done in 1977. He asked me whether I would be willing to coordi nate the census in Massachusetts, thus setting in motion what has turned out to be probably the largest and most comprehensive bird cen sus handled to date by the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife's Non game and Endangered Species Program (DFW - NESP). Plundered by plume hianters in the 1890s, forced by human encroachment to abandon many of their natural nesting habitats and battered by the onslaught of environmental toxicants, the colonial waterbirds are sur vivors. Some species are still threatened today, while others - wit ness the gulls - rank among textbook examples of biological capitalists and flourish in vast numbers, scavenging the byproducts of the seafood industry and our "throw-away" society. -
Final Pathogen TMDL for the Islands Watershed, April 2020 (Control
Final Pathogen TMDL for the Islands Watershed April 2020 (Control Number: CN 254.1) Island Watersheds Prepared as a cooperative effort by: Massachusetts DEP EPA New England Region 1 1 Winter Street 5 Post Office Square Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Division of Watershed Management 8 New Bond Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01606 This report is also available on MassDEP’s web page https://www.mass.gov/total-maximum-daily-loads- tmdls. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Acknowledgement This report was developed by ENSR (now AECOM) through a partnership with the Resource Triangle Institute (RTI) contracting with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and MassDEP under the National Watershed Protection Program. The report follows the same format and methodology for previously approved bacteria TMDLs (Boston Harbor, Weymouth, Weir and Mystic Rivers, Buzzards Bay, Cape Cod, Charles, North Coastal, and South Coastal Watersheds). ii Total Maximum Daily Loads for Pathogens within the Islands Watershed Island Watersheds Key Features: Pathogen TMDL for the Islands Watershed Location: EPA Region 1 Land Type: New England Coastal 303(d) Listings: Pathogens Nantucket1: Nantucket Harbor (MA97-01) Polpis Harbor (MA97-26) Sesachacha Pond (MA97-02) Martha’s Vineyard1,2: Chilmark Pond (MA97-05) Edgartown Harbor (MA97-15) Oak Bluffs Harbor (MA97-07) Sengekontacket Pond MA97-10, Tisbury Great Pond (MA97-18) Vineyard Haven Harbor (MA97-09) Elizabeth Islands: Cuttyhunk Pond (MA97-21) 1- Pathogen Impaired segments identified after the public comment period for this TMDL will be included in a future TMDL as an Addendum to this report. -
Hazard Mitigation Plan Draft
Dukes County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2020 May 4, 2020 draft Prepared by: The Martha’s Vineyard Commission In conjunction with the emergency managers and planning teams of the seven Dukes County towns Dukes County Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Update 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (page numbers to be included in FINAL) List of Figures List of Tables Acknowledgements Executive Summary Section 1. Introduction Section 2. Community Profile Section 3. Plan Development Section 4. Hazard Identification & Assessment Section 5. Vulnerability & Risk Assessment/Analysis by town Section 6. Hazard Mitigation Strategy by town Mitigation strategy talking points Mitigation strategy details Existing Protection Matrix Section 7. Plan implementation, monitoring, evaluation and update APPENDIX – Sea Level Rise Impacts Dukes County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2020 2 LIST OF FIGURES Section 2. Community Profile Locus of the Dukes County towns Present Development on Martha’s Vineyard Projected Development on Martha’s Vineyard Section 4. Hazard Identification & Assessment Sylvia State Beach, December 19, 1995 Sylvia State Beach, December 20, 1995 Intense Hurricane Strikes Hurricane Sandy trackline USGS photo of Storm Surge Aerial view of Pay Beach, Oak Bluffs Photos of Hadlock Pond Dam, Fort Ann, NY damage Section 5. Vulnerability & Risk Assessment/Analysis To be included in final Section 7. Implementation SLOSH map at the Chappaquiddick Fire Station Dukes County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2020 3 LIST OF TABLES Section 2. Community Profile Estimated Average Summer Population – 2010 Projection of Future Development Section 3. Plan Development Meetings and Public Sessions Section 4. Hazard Identification & Assessment Saffir/Simpson scale to rate strength of a hurricane 21st Century Hurricanes in New England 20th Century Hurricanes in Southern New England Section 5. -
Appendices 1 - 5
2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendices 1 - 5 Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters for the Clean Water Act 2018/20 Reporting Cycle Draft for Public Comment Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Table of Contents Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2. Assessment units and integrated list categories presented alphabetically by major watershed ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix 3. Impairments added to the 2018/2020 integrated list .......................................................... 113 Appendix 4. Impairments removed from the 2018/2020 integrated list ................................................. 139 Appendix 5. Impairments changed from the prior reporting cycle .......................................................... 152 2 2018-20ILApp1-5_DRAFT210326.docx Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Appendix 1. List of “Actions” (TMDLs and Alternative Restoration Plans) approved by the EPA for Massachusetts waters Approval/Completion ATTAINS Action ID Report Title Date 5, 6 Total Maximum -
Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Beaches ME-NY Rice 2015
Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Sandy Beaches in the U.S. Atlantic Coast Breeding Range of the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) prior to Hurricane Sandy: Maine to the North Shore and Peconic Estuary of New York1 Tracy Monegan Rice Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. June 2015 Recovery Task 1.2 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Recovery Plan for the piping plover (Charadrius melodus) prioritizes the maintenance of “natural coastal formation processes that perpetuate high quality breeding habitat,” specifically discouraging the “construction of structures or other developments that will destroy or degrade plover habitat” (Task 1.21), “interference with natural processes of inlet formation, migration, and closure” (Task 1.22), and “beach stabilization projects including snowfencing and planting of vegetation at current or potential plover breeding sites” (Task 1.23) (USFWS 1996, pp. 65-67). This assessment fills a data need to identify such habitat modifications that have altered natural coastal processes and the resulting abundance, distribution, and condition of currently existing habitat in the breeding range. Four previous studies provided these data for the United States (U.S.) continental migration and overwintering range of the piping plover (Rice 2012a, 2012b) and the southern portion of the U.S. Atlantic Coast breeding range (Rice 2014, 2015a). This assessment provides these data for one habitat type – namely sandy beaches within the northern portion of the breeding range along the Atlantic coast of the U.S. prior to Hurricane Sandy. A separate report assessed tidal inlet habitat in the same geographic range prior to Hurricane Sandy (Rice 2015b). Separate reports will assess the status of these two habitats in the northern and southern portions of the U.S. -
Naushon Island
D N R O B A R L 0A S "! H I S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SR S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S T E G N O N A M E S S E N OAT N I NECKS D MINK POND S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S NS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S A Eastern oyster Y L VECKATIMEST A ISLAND B S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S D S S S S S S S S S S I O HORSENECK BEACH S CEDARJonahN crab ISLAND O STATE RESERVATION S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S N S S MASRYS S S S S S S S S ¢[S HSeMrrSingS guSll S S S S S S S S O LAKE DEP Environmental Sensitivity Map H MONOHANSETT S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S ISLANDS S S S S S S S S S S S S S p Daggerblade grass shrimp U A Harbor seal S BAY S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SN S S S S S S S S S S SCKREYSosSeaSte SterSn S S S S S S S S S S Haddock LA im May-Sep r S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S h S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S -
Summary of 2006 Census of American Oystercatchers in Massachusetts
SUMMARY OF 2006 CENSUS OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS IN MASSACHUSETTS Compiled by: Scott M. Melvin Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Westborough, MA 01581 August 2007 SUMMARY OF 2006 CENSUS OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS IN MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCTION This report summarizes data collected during a statewide census of the American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) in Massachusetts during the 2006 breeding season. This census was conducted by a statewide network of cooperating agencies and organizations. The American Oystercatcher is a large, strikingly colored shorebird that nests on coastal beaches along the Atlantic Coast from Maine to Florida. Although the species has expanded its range and increased in abundance in New England over the past 50 years, its range extension northward along the Atlantic Coast may well be a recolonization of formerly occupied habitat (Forbush 1912). On a continental scale, the American Oystercatcher is one of the most uncommon species of breeding shorebirds in North America and has been designated a Species of High Concern in the United States Shorebird Conservation Plan (Brown et. al. 2001). METHODS Data on American Oystercatcher abundance, distribution, and reproductive success were collected by a coast-wide group of cooperators that included full-time and seasonal biologists and coastal waterbird monitors, beach managers, researchers, and volunteers. This is the same group that conducts annual censuses of Piping Plovers and terns in Massachusetts (Melvin 2007, Mostello 2007). Observers censused adult oystercatchers during or as close as possible to the designated census period of 22 - 31 May 2006, in order to minimize double-counting of birds that might move between multiple sites during the breeding season. -
Massachusetts Tern Inventory 1999
Massachusetts Tern Inventory 1999 Bradford G. Blodget, State Ornithologist Overview Compiled census results from our cooperator network indicate 1999 was, overall, yet another fine year for terns in Massachusetts. However, the season got off to a very uncertain start with the catastrophic disruption and total abandonment of the huge common tern colony at Plymouth Beach. Without doubt, this was the headline event of the season. Terns attempting to settle at Plymouth Beach in May were confronted with 2 families of red fox working the beach and by 4 June had completely abandoned the site. With the imminent investment of so much reproductive effort at Plymouth, the terns clearly did the right thing. Since the abandonment occurred at the very start of the season, most of the approximately 5,000 pairs redistributed themselves among 4 other sites, generally eastward as far as Chatham, where they were at least modestly productive. The breakup of the Plymouth colony, while clearly a shock to the system, served to illustrate a number of important points: (1) the resourcefulness of the terns themselves when confronted with an emergency; (2) the critical importance of maintaining alternative nesting sites for potential occupation at any time; and (3) the consequences of not timely removing mammalian predators at strategically important sites. The dispersal of birds from Plymouth also tested the ability of our census strategy to account for where all these birds went. The unsettling effect of the Plymouth abandonment notwithstanding, overall numbers of terns rose in 1999, continuing the upward trend of recent years. While many sites reported predation, it was at limited to normal levels at most sites. -
Table 1), from a Total of 229 Sites Surveyed (Tables 1, 2)
SUMMARY OF 2009 CENSUS OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS IN MASSACHUSETTS Compiled by: Scott M. Melvin Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Westborough, MA 01581 July 30, 2010 SUMMARY OF 2009 CENSUS OF AMERICAN OYSTERCATCHERS IN MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCTION This report summarizes data collected during a statewide census of the American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) in Massachusetts during the 2009 breeding season. This census was conducted by observers affiliated with a statewide network of cooperating agencies and organizations. The American Oystercatcher is a large, strikingly colored shorebird that nests on coastal beaches along the Atlantic Coast from Maine to Florida. Although the species has expanded its range and increased in abundance in New England over the past 50 years, its range extension northward along the Atlantic Coast may well be a recolonization of formerly occupied habitat (Forbush 1912). On a continental scale, the American Oystercatcher is one of the most uncommon species of breeding shorebirds in North America and is designated a Species of High Concern in the United States Shorebird Conservation Plan (Brown et. al. 2001). METHODS Data on American Oystercatcher abundance, distribution, and reproductive success were collected by a coast-wide group of cooperators that included full-time and seasonal biologists and coastal waterbird monitors, beach managers, researchers, and volunteers. This is the same group that conducts annual censuses of Piping Plovers and terns in Massachusetts (Melvin 2010, Mostello 2010). Observers censused adult oystercatchers during or as close as possible to the designated census period of 22 - 31 May 2009, in order to minimize double-counting of birds that might move between multiple sites during the breeding season. -
Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Tidal Inlets in the US Atlantic Coast
Inventory of Habitat Modifications to Tidal Inlets in the U.S. Atlantic Coast Breeding Range of the Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus) as of 2015: Maine to North Carolina1 Tracy Monegan Rice Terwilliger Consulting, Inc. October 2016 Inlets are a highly valuable habitat for piping plovers (Charadrius melodus), red knots, other shorebirds, and waterbirds for foraging, loafing, and roosting (Harrington 2008, Lott et al. 2009, Maddock et al. 2009). The North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (LCC) has designated the piping plover as a representative species in all three subregions, standing as a surrogate for other species using dynamic beach systems including American oystercatchers, least terns, black skimmers, seabeach amaranth and migrating shorebirds (http://www.fws.gov/northeast/science/pdf/nalcc_terrestrial_rep_species_table.pdf). Recovery Task 1.2 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Recovery Plan for the piping plover prioritizes the maintenance of “natural coastal formation processes that perpetuate high quality breeding habitat,” specifically discouraging the “construction of structures or other developments that will destroy or degrade plover habitat” (Task 1.21), and the “interference with natural processes of inlet formation, migration, and closure” (Task 1.22) (USFWS 1996, pp. 65-66). A series of assessments recently filled the data need to identify such habitat modifications that have altered natural coastal processes and the resulting abundance, distribution, and condition of existing habitat in the United States (U.S.) Atlantic Coast breeding range prior to Hurricane Sandy and immediately after Hurricane Sandy in October 2012. The U.S. Atlantic Coast breeding range of the piping plover stretches from Maine (ME) to North Carolina (NC).