PCB, Organochlorine Pesticide and Mercury Changes in Lake Trout

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PCB, Organochlorine Pesticide and Mercury Changes in Lake Trout PCB, Organochlorine Pesticide and Mercury Changes in Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) from Five Finger Lakes, New York State Lawrence C. Skinner1 Ronald J. Sloan1, 5 Samuel J. Jackling2 Anthony Gudlewski3 Ralph Karcher4 1 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4756 2 Formerly (now retired): New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid and Hazardous Materials 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233 3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Hale Creek Field Station 182 Steele Avenue Extension Gloversville, New York 12078 4 Formerly (now retired): New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Air Sterling Laboratory Facility Rensselaer, New York 12144 5 Now retired. May 2010 ABSTRACT Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides and mercury have been measured episodically in lake trout of know age taken from four Finger Lakes (Canadice, Canandaigua, Keuka, Seneca) over an approximate 25 year period and from Cayuga Lake for nearly 40 years. Concentrations of PCBs, total p,p=-DDT, p,p=-DDE, total chlordane, trans- nonachlor and mercury increase with age of the lake trout until about age 7 to 8, after which the rate of accumulation with age slows. For all five lakes, concentrations of PCBs, DDT and metabolites, chlordane compounds and hexachlorobenzene have declined over the period of measurement by 70 percent or more. The patterns of declines are not consistent among lakes and chemical compounds. Keuka Lake has shown increases of several chemical residues in the last few years. Mirex, a compound not used in the Finger Lakes basin, had residues that were initially absent, then low concentrations near the detection limit of 2 ng/g were frequently found in the mid 1990's, but again became non-detectable after 2000. Mercury concentrations in fish aged 3 through 6 are generally less than 500 ng/g, and older fish contain mercury frequently in excess of 500 ng/g. Within Seneca Lake, mercury concentrations have remained relatively stable over the period of measurement. Since 1970, mercury in Cayuga Lake lake trout has declined an average of 42 percent, but the decline occurred between 1970 and 1988 and concentrations have been stable since 1988. Mercury in Canadice, Canandaigua and Keuka Lakes was stable from 1988 through the mid 1990s, but since then specific age group mercury concentrations have increased at least 40 percent in each lake, and up to 128 percent in age 5 lake trout from Canandaigua Lake. However, in Canandaigua Lake, mercury subsequently declined in 2009. The specific causal factors for the mercury increases are unknown. The historical record for chemical residues in lake trout from other Finger Lakes is also presented. Notably, DDT levels in Hemlock Lake fish appear to have declined by at least 95 percent in the 38 year record, and residues of all organic compounds have declined in lake trout from Owasco, Otsego and Skaneateles Lakes. ii Table of Contents Page Abstract ii List of Tables iv List of Figures vii Introduction 1 The lakes 1 Chemical compounds of primary concern 1 Health advisories 3 Methods 5 Results 7 Lipids 7 PCBs 7 DDT and metabolites 9 Chlordane and trans-nonachlor 10 Mercury 12 Mirex 12 Dieldrin 13 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 13 Lipid, PCB, organochlorine pesticide and mercury data for fish over 8 years old 13 Discussion 14 Comparisons with historical data 14 Sample portions 14 Analytical methods 15 Temporal changes 16 Hemlock Lake 18 Other Finger Lakes 18 Remedial efforts 18 A possible role of zebra mussels? 20 Conclusions 23 PCB and organochlorine pesticides 23 Mercury 24 Health advisories 24 Acknowledgments 26 References Cited 27 iii List of Tables Table Page 1 Recommended maximum concentrations of certain chemical 38 residues in fish for the protection of human health. 2 Recommended maximum concentrations of certain chemical 39 residues in fish for the protection of fish-consuming wildlife. 3 Health advisories for human consumers of fish for fish taken 40 from the Finger Lakes, New York 4 Changes in the incidence of some organochlorine residues in 42 lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes between 1983 and 2008. 5 Incidence of some organochlorine pesticide analytes determined 45 in recent collections of Finger Lakes lake trout. 6 Lipid concentrations (percent wet weight in standard fillets) in 46 aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 7 Kruskal-Wallis comparisons (or Mann-Whitney test comparisons) 49 of total PCB concentrations by age for lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 8 Temporal comparisons of total PCB concentrations (ng/g wet weight 52 in standard fillets) for aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 9 Concentration distributions of p,p=-DDT analytes in Finger Lakes 55 lake trout. 10 Total p,p=-DDT concentrations (ng/g wet weight in standard fillets) 56 for aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 11 Kruskal-Wallis comparisons (or Mann-Whitney test comparisons) 59 of p,p=-DDE concentrations by age for lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 12 Temporal comparisons of p,p=-DDE concentrations (ng/g wet weight 62 in standard fillets) for aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. iv 13 Distribution of chlordane analytes in Finger Lakes lake trout. 66 14 Detection (percent of samples by year) of chlordane analytes in 68 lake trout taken from the Finger Lakes, New York. 15 Total chlordane concentrations (ng/g wet weight in standard fillets) 70 in aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 16 Temporal comparisons of trans-nonachlor concentrations (ng/g 72 wet weight in standard fillets) for aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 17 Kruskal-Wallis comparisons (or Mann-Whitney test comparisons) 74 of trans-nonachlor concentrations by age for lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 18 Kruskal-Wallis comparisons (or Mann-Whitney test comparisons) 76 of mercury concentrations by age for lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 19 Temporal comparisons of mercury concentrations (ng/g wet weight 78 in standard fillets) for aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 20 Changes over time in the frequency of detection of mirex in lake 81 trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 21 Changes over time in the frequency of non-detection of dieldrin in 82 lake trout (ages 3 through 6 years old) taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 22 Dieldrin concentrations (ng/g wet weight in standard fillets) in 83 aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 23 Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) concentrations (ng/g wet weight in 86 standard fillets) in aged lake trout taken from five Finger Lakes, New York. 24 Chemical residues concentrations in other aged lake trout taken 90 from five Finger Lakes, New York during 1983 through 2008. 25 PCB and mercury concentrations in Cayuga Lake lake trout in 95 1970. v 26 Total p,p=-DDT and p,p=-DDE concentrations in Cayuga Lake lake 96 trout taken in 1968 through 1970. 27 Chemical residue concentrations in lake trout from four other Finger Lakes in New York. 98 28 Chemical residue concentrations in lake trout from five Finger 101 Lakes, New York, prior to 1983. vi List of Figures Figure Page 1 The Finger Lakes of New York. 104 2 Temporal changes in polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations on 105 wet weight and lipid bases in aged lake trout from Canadice Lake. 3 Temporal changes in polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations on 106 wet weight and lipid bases in aged lake trout from Canandaigua Lake. 4 Temporal changes in polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations on 107 wet weight and lipid bases in aged lake trout from Cayuga Lake. 5 Temporal changes in polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations on 108 wet weight and lipid bases in aged lake trout from Keuka Lake. 6 Temporal changes in polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations on 109 wet weight and lipid bases in aged lake trout from Seneca Lake. 7 Temporal changes in total p,p=-DDT and total chlordane 110 concentrations in aged lake trout taken from Canadice Lake. 8 Temporal changes in total p,p=-DDT and total chlordane 111 concentrations in aged lake trout taken from Canandaigua Lake. 9 Temporal changes in total p,p=-DDT and total chlordane 112 concentrations in aged lake trout taken from Cayuga Lake. 10 Temporal changes in total p,p=-DDT and total chlordane 113 concentrations in aged lake trout taken from Keuka Lake. 11 Temporal changes in total p,p=-DDT and total chlordane 114 concentrations in aged lake trout taken from Seneca Lake. 12 Temporal changes in p,p=-DDE concentrations on wet weight and 115 lipid bases in aged lake trout from Canadice Lake. 13 Temporal changes in p,p=-DDE concentrations on wet weight and 116 lipid bases in aged lake trout from Canandaigua Lake. 14 Temporal changes in p,p=-DDE concentrations on wet weight and 117 lipid bases in aged lake trout from Cayuga Lake. vii 15 Temporal changes in p,p=-DDE concentrations on wet weight and 118 lipid bases in aged lake trout from Keuka Lake. 16 Temporal changes in p,p=-DDE concentrations on wet weight and 119 lipid bases in aged lake trout from Seneca Lake. 17 Temporal changes in trans-nonachlor concentrations on wet weight 120 and lipid bases in lake trout taken from Canadice Lake. 18 Temporal changes in trans-nonachlor concentrations on wet weight 121 and lipid bases in lake trout taken from Canandaigua Lake. 19 Temporal changes in trans-nonachlor concentrations on wet weight 122 and lipid bases in lake trout taken from Cayuga Lake.
Recommended publications
  • Hemlock-Canadice Unit Management Plan
    Division of Lands & Forests Bureau of State Land Management HEMLOCK-CANADICE UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Livingston County towns of Livonia, Conesus and Springwater Ontario County towns of Richmond and Canadice January 2015 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Region 8 Sub-Office 7291 Coon Rd. Bath, New York 14810 Hemlock-Canadice Unit Management Plan New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Mission “The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of New York to conserve, improve and protect its natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being.” - Environmental Conservation Law 1-0101(1) Preface It is the policy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) to manage state lands for multiple benefits to serve the people of New York State. This Unit Management Plan (Unit) is the first step in carrying out that policy. The plan has been developed to address management activities on this unit for the next 10 year period. Some management recommendations may extend beyond the 10 year period. Factors such as budget constraints, wood product markets, and forest health problems may necessitate deviations from the scheduled management activities. Vision Statement for All State Forests State Forests on the Hemlock-Canadice Unit will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Seneca
    TOWN OF BRISTOL Inventory of Land Use and Land Cover Prepared for: Ontario County Water Resources Council 20 Ontario Street, 3rd Floor Canandaigua, New York 14424 and Town of Bristol 6740 County Road 32 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Prepared by: Dr. Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424-8395 2020 Cover image: Ground level view of a perched swamp white oak forest community (S1S2) surrounding a shrub swamp that was discovered and documented on Johnson Hill north of Dugway Road. This forest community type is rare statewide and extremely rare locally, and harbors a unique assemblage of uncommon plant species. (Image by the Bruce Gilman). Acknowledgments: For over a decade, the Ontario County Planning Department has supported a working partnership between local towns and the Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture at Finger Lakes Community College that involves field research, ground truthing and digital mapping of natural land cover and cultural land use patterns. Previous studies have been completed for the Canandaigua Lake watershed, the southern Honeoye Valley, the Honeoye Lake watershed, the complete Towns of Canandaigua, Gorham, Richmond and Victor, and the woodlots, wetlands and riparian corridors in the Towns of Seneca, Phelps and Geneva. This report summarizes the latest land use/land cover study conducted in the Town of Bristol. The final report would not have been completed without the vital assistance of Terry Saxby of the Ontario County Planning Department. He is gratefully thanked for his assistance with landowner information, his patience as the fieldwork was slowly completed, and his noteworthy help transcribing the field maps to geographic information system (GIS) shape files.
    [Show full text]
  • Finger Lakes Activity Guide
    It’s time to play again! Finger Lakes Activity Guide with FeLiX 6-6-2020 1 It’s time to play again! Finger Lakes Activity Guide Inspired by The Finger Lakes Team’s I’m unwillingness to let our creative minds be quarantined. Our Finger Lakes area has so much to explore FeLiX and enjoy and share and learn and There’s nothing I love invent and … well you get the idea. more than sharing my Come inside this guide – and have passion for Ontario County some Finger Lakes Fun. with visitors and locals! Have some fun and uncover my Fast Facts inside! Aim, scan & explore! Find the answers to Using your cell phone aim your camera all the Activity Guide at the QR Codes throughout the book puzzles and games in to learn more. Tip: Make sure “QR the back of this guide. scanner” is turned on in your settings. Follow Us! VisitFLX ® I LOVE NEW YORK is a registered trademark and service mark of the New York State Department of Economic Development; used VisitFLX with permission. Hey friends. Usually we’d make a promise that all things were accurate at VisitFLX the time of printing, but these are uncertain times and we’re trying to keep up and give you timely information. We always recommend that if you’d like Finger Lakes Visitors Connection to go somewhere that you call ahead and check out their hours and their visitation policies. It’s even more important now – and we appreciate your 25 Gorham Street understanding! 5/18/20. Canandaigua, NY 14424 (585) 394-3915 Guide Design and Artwork by harrisstudios.com VisitFingerLakes.com ©Copyright 2020 5/2020/HS Printed in U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FINGER LAKES WATER QUALITY REPORT Summary of Historic Finger Lakes Data and the 2017- 2018 Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program
    2018 FINGER LAKES WATER QUALITY REPORT Summary of Historic Finger Lakes Data and the 2017- 2018 Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program November 2019 Division of Water (DOW) Finger Lakes Watershed Hub (FLWH) 615 Erie Boulevard, Syracuse, NY Lake Monitoring and Assessment Section (LMAS) 625 Broadway, Albany, NY www.dec.ny.gov 2018 Finger Lakes Water Quality Report Summary of Historic Finger Lakes Data and the 2017-2018 Citizen Statewide Lake Assessment Program November 2019 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Division of Water (DOW) Finger Lakes Watershed Hub (FLWH) 615 Erie Boulevard, Syracuse, NY (315) 426-7500 Aimee Clinkhammer, Scott Cook, Lewis McCaffrey, Anthony R. Prestigiacomo Lake Monitoring and Assessment Section (LMAS) 625 Broadway, Albany, NY (518) 402-8179 Stephanie June, Rebecca Gorney, Scott Kishbaugh New York State Federation of Lake Associations, Inc. P.O. Box 84, LaFayette, NY Nancy Mueller ii Acknowledgements The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s (NYSDEC) Citizens Statewide Lake Assessment Program’s (CSLAP’s) expansion into the Finger Lakes was made possible by funding from the NYS Environmental Protection Fund-Ocean and Great Lakes Program. This funding allowed 22 sites on the 11 Finger Lakes to be added to the program in the spring of 2017. The program increased in 2018, with 6 additional sites on three of the largest lakes, Seneca, Cayuga, and Keuka. CSLAP in the Finger Lakes has allowed the NYSDEC to: (1) collect critical water quality data on these important natural resources, (2) assess contemporary water quality in the Finger Lakes in the context of recent and continuing water quality concerns, (3) make comparisons of the water quality between the lakes in 2017 and 2018, and (4) continue preliminary trend analyses for individual lakes over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Orchard Watershed State of the Basin Report
    Oak Orchard Watershed State of the Basin Report Prepared for Oak Orchard Watershed Protection Alliance Prepared by SUNY Brockport Consulting Team James Zollweg (report compilation, GIS) Mark Noll, Ted Lewis (water quality) Paul Richards (hydrology) Scott Wells (fish survey) Emily Kridel December 2005 Funded by Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FL-LOWPA) Sponsored by Genesee and Orleans County Soil and Water Conservation Districts Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................4 a. Purpose .............................................................................................................................4 b. Background ......................................................................................................................4 c. Historical Events Impacting the Oak Orchard Watershed................................................6 d. Water Quality and Quantity Goals.................................................................................17 e. Previous Studies .............................................................................................................17 f. Relationships to International, Federal, State, and Other Local Programs.....................20 1. International Joint Commission (IJC) ........................................................................20 2. Great Lakes Commission ...........................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Into Our Preserves VISIT the PLACES YOU’VE HELPED PROTECT
    Spring Into Our Preserves VISIT THE PLACES YOU’VE HELPED PROTECT EXPLORE AT: nature.org/cwnypreserves MEMBER UPDATE CENTRAL & WESTERN NEW YORK CHAPTER Connect. Explore. Give. In Central and Western New York, we’re fortunate to have 20 percent of the world’s surface water—the Great Lakes—in our backyard. The Nature Conservancy believes we have an obligation to protect and steward our fresh water, not only for environmental reasons but for the competitive advantage water provides us in a thirsty world. BOARD OF TRUSTEES The Great Lakes have a cousin in Africa’s Rift Lakes. Lake Susan van der Stricht, Rochester, Chair Tanganyika, Lake Victoria and Lake Malawi comprise 25 percent of the world’s surface fresh water. Lew Allyn, Naples, Florida Brian Baird, Buffalo The Nature Conservancy is helping Africans protect Lake Tanganyika, Bruce Bongarten, Ph.D., the world’s second-largest lake. Our Chapter is playing an important role Rochester with financial resources and technical assistance. Barry Boyer, East Aurora Lake Tanganyika is starting from a strong place. There are no invasive species, no water diversion Peter Brennan, M.D., threats, no major cities on the shoreline. Not yet. To help them, we are sharing the lessons we’ve Ithaca learned in North America’s Great Lakes. Enid Cardinal, We’re also learning a lot from our African partners. At Lake Tanganyika, the linkage between people’s Rochester well-being and a healthy environment is much more explicit. In the U.S., it’s easy to forget how Laurie Dann, dependent we are on nature. This winter, we had the opportunity to take a group of Conservancy Buffalo supporters to Lake Tanganyika to experience these connections first-hand.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the New York Lake Ontario Basin Project
    The State of the New York Lake Ontario Basin: AA ReportReport onon WaterWater ResourcesResources andand LocalLocal WatershedWatershed ManagementManagement ProgramsPrograms Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance 309 Lake Street, Penn Yan, New York 315-536-7488 ©2000 Correspondence on this report may be forwarded to: Water Resources Board 309 Lake Street Penn Yan, New York 14527 315-536-7488 e-mail: [email protected] — ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS — Funding for this project was provided by New York State through an appropriation in the Environmental Protection Fund for the Finger Lakes – Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FL-LOWPA). The 25 counties of FL-LOWPA express their gratitude to Governor George Pataki and the New York State Legislature for support of the FL-LOWPA program. The principal investigators for this project were Elizabeth Moran, Ph.D. and John Roebig, Ph.D. of EcoLogic, LLC in Cazenovia, New York. Several individuals affiliat- ed with FL-LOWPA contributed substantially to the project, including county rep- resentatives Jim Balyszak (Yates County), Warren Hart (Ontario County), Charlie Knauf (Monroe County), Russ Nemecek (Onondaga County), Karen Noyes (Oswego County) and staff members Betsy Landre and Marion Balyszak (Water Resources Board)/. Mercury Print Productions in Rochester, New York designed the layout and printed the report. An endeavor to characterize water quality status and programming at the local level across a region as vast as the New York Lake Ontario Basin depends upon infor- mation from many sources. Dozens of water resources professionals at the federal, state, regional, county and local levels and water quality coordinating committees in the Basin provided valuable information that made this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario County & the Finger Lakes 3 New Trails Inside!
    3 New Trails Inside! Ontario County & The Finger Lakes Bike Around New York’s Finger Lakes Conesus Lake ~ 18 miles. Gently rolling countryside, flat, easy ride Canadice Lake ~ 13 miles. Moderate with one aggressive climb Hemlock Lake ~ 27 miles. Moderate to difficult, hilly terrain Honeoye Lake ~ 19 miles. Gently rolling countryside, flat, easy ride Canandaigua Lake ~ 44 miles. Moderate with three long climbs Keuka Lake Bluff ~ 27 miles. Easy to moderate, level to slightly undulating, with one long climb Keuka Lake ~ 45 miles. Moderate hills above the east side of the lake, mostly level along west side Seneca Lake ~ 77 miles. Moderate, with one long climb leaving Watkins Glen Cayuga Lake ~ 90 miles. Easy to moderate cycling with rolling terrain, and several long, moderate climbs Skaneateles Lake ~ 40 miles. Moderately difficult, rolling hills with gradual inclines Owasco Lake ~ 32 miles. Easy to moderate. One long incline on west side LAKE ONTARIO 81 Cayuga-Seneca Canal ~ 20 miles. Rochester ERIE CANAL Lyons 90 90 Syracuse Easy, relatively flat, combination of road and grass trails Palmyra 90 Skaneateles Victor Auburn Canandaigua Seneca Falls OWASCO LAKE Erie Canal ~ 18 miles. Palmyra/Pittsford. 390 Geneva CAYUGA OWASCO Honeoye SENECA Geneseo SENECA CANAL LAKE HONEOYE LAKE Mount LAKE CANANDAIGUA SKANEATELES Morris CONESUS LAKE LAKE 23 miles. Savannah/Palmyra. Flat with mostly cinder between LAKE Penn Yan CANADICE HEMLOCKLAKE CAYUGA LAKE LAKE Naples LETCHWORTH Cortland Palmyra and Pittsford. Roadside and trail between Savannah and Palmyra STATE PARK KEUKA LAKE Ithaca 81 Lake Ontario Seaway Trail ~ Traverse the southern shore of Hammondsport Watkins Glen 86 Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Seneca
    TOWN OF VICTOR Inventory of Land Use and Land Cover Prepared for: Ontario County Water Resources Council 20 Ontario Street, 3rd Floor Canandaigua, New York 14424 and Town of Victor 85 East Main Street Victor, New York 14564 Prepared by: Dr. Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424-8395 March 2014 Cover image: Black Chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Ell.) growing in a rich shrub fen plant community along Log Cabin Road, Town of Victor, New York. Acknowledgments: The Ontario County Planning Department has long supported a partnership between local towns and the Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture at Finger Lakes Community College that involves inventory and mapping of natural land cover and cultural land use. Previous reports have been completed for the Canandaigua Lake watershed, the Honeoye Lake watershed, and the woodlots, wetlands and riparian corridors in the Towns of Seneca, Phelps and Geneva. This report summarizes the latest land use/land cover study conducted in the Town of Victor. Terry Saxby, Ontario County Planning Department, is thanked for his assistance with landowner information, his patience as the fieldwork was slowly completed, and his noteworthy help transcribing the field maps to geographic information system (GIS) shape files. Sheri Norton, Ontario County Information Services, assisted with map production, shape file maintenance and data summaries. The format of this data will allow for easy retrieval, immediate use during project review, and it will create a template for future updating of the Town of Victor’s natural resources database, a vital component of their comprehensive plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip a GLACIAL GEOLOGY of the WESTERN FINGER LAKES
    A-I Trip A GLACIAL GEOLOGY OF THE WESTERN FINGER LAKES REGION Victor E. Schmidt State University College at Brockport Note: This trip and discussion are designed primarily for undergraduate students, rather than for specialists in glacial geology __ who are, nonetheless, most welcome. An attempt, however imperfect, is made to distinguish observations from inferences, hypotheses, and specula­ tions based on these and other observations. The number of proposed stops is probably greater than time will allow, and so selection will be made on the basis of weather conditions and the interests of the group. Route: Leave Rochester, 8:00 AM. Take Rt ISA south, through Henrietta, Rush, and Lima, to Hemlock. At Rush, Rt lSA crosses westward-flowing Honeoye Creek, carrying water from three of the western Finger Lakes to the Genesee River, which flows northward to Lake Ontario. At Sibleyville, 1.3 mi from Rush, the route crosses a broad, swampy, flat-bottomed valley, interpreted as a glacial drainage channel which carried a river of glacial meltwater eastward, along the front of the glacier. (If time permits, a slight de­ tour via Phelps Rd and Wagner Rd will allow a better view.) Directly west of Honeoye Falls, 3.6 mi from Rush, is an outcrop of Middle Devonian Onondaga limestone, the formation over which Honeoye Creek falls at Honeoye Falls. Long, streamlined hills--typical drumlins--parallel the route; the road goes over several, and a large one can be seen to the west, from approx 4 mi south of Lima. South of Hemlock, leave Rt lSA and take Rt 20A east.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemlock-Canadice Unit Management Plan
    Division of Lands & Forests Bureau of State Land Management HEMLOCK-CANADICE UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Livingston County towns of Livonia, Conesus and Springwater Ontario County towns of Richmond and Canadice January 2015 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Region 8 Sub-Office 7291 Coon Rd. Bath, New York 14810 Hemlock-Canadice Unit Management Plan New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Mission “The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of New York to conserve, improve and protect its natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well-being.” - Environmental Conservation Law 1-0101(1) Preface It is the policy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) to manage state lands for multiple benefits to serve the people of New York State. This Unit Management Plan (Unit) is the first step in carrying out that policy. The plan has been developed to address management activities on this unit for the next 10 year period. Some management recommendations may extend beyond the 10 year period. Factors such as budget constraints, wood product markets, and forest health problems may necessitate deviations from the scheduled management activities. Vision Statement for All State Forests State Forests on the Hemlock-Canadice Unit will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Honeoye Lake Watershed Management Plan Final Report – October 2007
    Honeoye Lake Watershed Management Plan This document was prepared for the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources with funds provided under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Final Report Acknowledgements State of New York Eliot Spitzer, Governor of the State of New York Lorraine A. Cortés-Vázquez, Secretary of State George Stafford, Director, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources Kevin Millington, Kenneth Smith, and Stephanie Wojtowicz, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources Honeoye Lake Watershed Task Force Bonnie Drake, Canadice Phil Faber, Naples Al Favro, Bristol Dan Marshall, South Bristol Randy Pawley, Richmond Jack Starke, Chairman Honeoye Lake Watershed Management Plan Technical Committee Don Bennett, Honeoye Valley Association Tom DeRue, Ontario County Soil and Water Conservation District Dr. Bruce Gilman, Finger Lakes Community College Terry Gronwall, Honeoye Valley Association Ed Jackson, Honeoye Valley Association Tim Jensen, Ontario County Planning Department Kevin Schultz, Ontario County Planning Department Jack Starke, Honeoye Lake Watershed Task Force Chairman Princeton Hydro Dr. Steve Souza Genesee / Finger Lakes Regional Planning Council Jayme Breschard, Planner Brian Slack, Senior Planner Andrew Stuart, Intern David Zorn, Executive Director GIS maps provided by Kevin Schultz, Ontario County Planning Department. Infrared Map of Honeoye Lake provided by Underwater Technologies Inc. Charts and graphs provided by Jack Starke and
    [Show full text]