DOCSLIB.ORG

Board of Port Commissioners City of Oakland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Board of Port Commissioners City of Oakland BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CITY OF OAKLAND PORT ORDINANCE No. 3127 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1.03 OF PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 RELATING TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF EMPLOYEES IN THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ENGINEER AND SUPERVISING ENGINEER CLASSIFICATIONS TO SALARY SCHEDULE RATES "D" AND "E" AND AMENDING SECTION 1.304 OF PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 TO PROVIDE FOR PREMIUM PAY FOR ENGINEERS ASSIGNED TO CRANE WORK. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. Section 1.03 of Port Ordinance No. 867 is hereby amended by the addition of the following thereto: "In addition to the provisions hereinabove set forth concerning assignment to Rates "d" and "e", effective January 1, 1993 employees in the classifications of Assistant Civil Engineer, Civil Engineer, Supervising Civil Engineer, Assistant Port Mechanical Electrical Engineer, Port Electrical/Mechanical Engineer and Port Supervising Electrical/Mechanical Engineer shall be assigned to salary Rates "d" or "e" of their salary schedule upon their conformance with the criteria and conditions for Performance/Experience Pay Increases set forth in Article 1.D. of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Western Council of Engineers, Port of Oakland Chapter and the Port." Section 2. The position title set forth in Section 8.091 of Port Ordinance No. 867 is hereby corrected to read "Port Supervising Electrical/Mechanical Engineer". Section 3. Section 1.304 of Port Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1.304. Each Engineer in the Port Professional-Engineering Unit who is regularly assigned to work in the Crane Administration and Design Section will be required to climb cranes from time to time and will receive additional premium pay of three percent (3%) of his/her regular salary rate. "In addition to the three percent (3%) premium pay above set forth, such an Engineer who supervises crane inspector(s) and is required to climb cranes frequently shall receive a further three percent (3%) premium pay for a total of six percent (6%) of his/her regular salary rate." In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, California, December 1, 1992. Passed to print for one day by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ward Allen, Broussard, Furth, Kramer, Loh, Ortiz and President Lockhart - 7. Noes: None. Absent: None. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board Adopted at a regular meeting held December 15, 1992 By the following Vote: Ayes: Commissioners Broussard, Kramer, Loh, Ortiz, Ward Allen and President Lockhart - 6. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Furth - 1. The Oaklanb Tribune. I 66 Jack London Square, Oakland, CA 94607 (510) 208-6300 LEGAL NO. 4034 PORT ORDINANCE 3127 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1.03 OF PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 RELATING TO THE ASSIGN- MENT OF EMPLOYEES IN THE ASSISTANT ENGI- NEER, ENGINEER AND SUPERVISING ENGINEER CLASSIFICATIONS TO SALARY SCHEDULE RATES "D" AND "E" AND AMENDING SECTION 1.304 OF PORT ORDINANCE NO. 867 TO PROVIDE FOR PRE- MIUM PAY FOR ENGINEERS ASSIGNED TO CRANE WORK. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commission- ers of the City of Oakland as follows: PROOF OF PUBLICATION Section 1. Section 1.03 of Port Ordinance No.867 is hereby amended by the addition of the following thereto: "In addition to the provisions hereinabove set forth concerning assignment to Rates "d" and "e", effective Case No. January 1, 1993 employees in the classifications of Assistant Civil Engineer, Civil Engineer, Supervising In the matter of Civil Engineer, Assistant Port Mechanical Electrical Engineer, Port Electrical/Mechanical Engineer and Port Supervising Electrical/Mechanical Engineer shall be assigned to salary Rates "d" or "e" of their salary Port of Oakland schedule upon their conformance with the criteria and conditions for Performance/Experience Pay Increases 530 Water St set forth in Article 1.D. of the Memorandum of Under- standing between the Western Council of Engineers, OaklandOakland, CA 94607 PortPo of Oakland Chapter and the Port." Section 2. The position title set forth in Section 8.091 of Port Ordinance No. 687 Is hereby corrected to read "Port Supervising Electrical/Mechanical Engineer" Section 3. Section 1.304 of Port Ordinance is hereby Alicia Blake deposes and amended to read as follows: s that he/she was the Public Notice Advertising Clerk of THE "Section 1.304. Each Engineer in the Port Prof es- OAKLAND TRIBUNE a newspaper of genera, circulation as sional-Engineering. Unit who is regularly assigned to defined by Government Code Section 6000, adjudcated as such work in the Crane Administration and Design Section by the SuperiorCourt the State of Calfomia, County of Alameda will be required to climb cranes from time to time and of will receive additional premium pay of three percent (Order No. 237798, December 4, 1951) which is published and (3%) of his/her regular salary rate. circulated in Oakland Township in said county and state seven "In addition to the three percent (3%) premium pay days a week. above set forth, such an Engineer who supervises crane inspector(s) and is required to climb cranes fre- That the. Port, . OTICUIRance NO . 3127 quently shall receive a further three percent (3%) pre- mium pay for a total of six percent (6%) of his/her regular salary rate. In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, Califor- nia, December 1, 1992. Passed to print for one day by of which the annexed is a printed copy, was published in every the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ward Allen, the following dates: Broussard,, Furth, Kramer, Loh, Ortiz and President issue of THE OAKLAND TRIBUNE on Lockhart - 7. Noes: None. Absent: None. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board December 14, 1992 No. 4034 December 14, 1992 (1t) I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Date December 31, 1992 at Oakland, California. Public Notice Advertising Clerk BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS CITY OF OAKLAND PORT ORDINANCE NO. 31,26 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF TERMINAL USE AGREEMENT WITH CANADIAN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commissioners of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. That certain Terminal Use Agreement ("Agreement") dated the 1st day of December, 1992, between the CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corporation, acting by and through this Board, and CANADIAN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED, a corporation, as User, covering Users nonexclusive right to use areas within the Ports Charles P. Howard Terminal as the published regularly scheduled Northern California port of call for the berthing of its vessels and the loading and discharge of cargoes and operations supplemental thereto in Users Europe - U.S. Pacific Coast Service, for a term commencing upon the first day of the month following the filing and effectiveness of said Agreement pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 of the Shipping Act of 1984 and the expiration of thirty (30) days from and after the final adoption of this ordinance to and including December 31, 1995 with User to pay to the Port ninety percent (90%) of dockage and wharfage tariff charges, subject to refund to User of an additional ten percent (10%) of wharfage tariff payments and a further adjustment of dockage tariff payments if Users dockage charges exceed eight (8) vessel calls in a contract year following the end of each contract year, except that User shall pay to the Port eighty percent (80%) of wharfage tariff charges on metal or metal products, lumber or wood products and paper or paper products as therein specified, all as consideration to User for the use of the assigned premises as their published regularly scheduled Northern California port of call, and otherwise upon the terms and conditions specified in said Agreement, is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 2. The President of the Board of Port Commissioners is hereby authorized to execute and the. Secretary to attest said Agreement. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after its final adoption. In Board of Port Commissioners, Oakland, California, December 1, 1992. Passed to print for one day by the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ward Allen, Broussard, Furth, Kramer, Loh, Ortiz and President Lockhart - 7. Noes: None. Absent: None. CHRISTOPHER C. MARSHALL Secretary of the Board Adopted at a regular meeting held December 15, 1992 By the following Vote: Ayes: Commissioners Broussard, Kramer, Loh, Ortiz, Ward Allen and President Lockhart - 6. Noes: None. Absent: Commissioner Furth - 1. Waklanh Tribunt 66 Jack London Square, Oakland, CA 94607 (510) 208-6300 LEGAL NO. 4033 PORT ORDINANCE 3126 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF TERMINAL USE AGREEMENT WITH CANADIAN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Port Commission- ers of the City of Oakland as follows: Section 1. That certain Terminal Use Agreement ("Agreement") dated the 1st day of December, 1992, between the CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal corpora- tion, acting by andthrough this Board, and CANADIAN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED, a corporation, as PROOF OF PUBLICATION User, covering. Users nonexclusive right to use areas within the Ports Charles P. Howard Terminal as the published regularly scheduled Northern California port of call for the berthing of its vessels and the loading and discharge of cargoes and operations supplemental Case No. thereto in Users Europe - U.S. Pacific Coast Service, for a term commencing upon the first day of the month In the matter of following thefiling and effectiveness of said Agreement pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 of theShipping Act of 1984 Port of Oakland and the expiration of thirty (30) days from and after the final adoption of this ordinance to and including De- ..53.Q.WAter St cember 31, 1995 with User to pay to the Port ninety percent (90%) of dockage and wharfage tariff charges, Oakland, CA 94607 subject to refund to User of an additional ten percent (10%) of wharfage tariff payments and a further adjust- ment of dockage tariff payments if Users dockage charges exceed eight (8) vessel calls in a contract year following the end of each contract year, except that User shall pay to the Port eighty percent (80%) of wharf- age tariff charges on metal or metal products, lumber.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hastings Law News Vol.18 No.2 UC Hastings College of the Law
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Hastings Law News UC Hastings Archives and History 11-1-1984 Hastings Law News Vol.18 No.2 UC Hastings College of the Law Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/hln Recommended Citation UC Hastings College of the Law, "Hastings Law News Vol.18 No.2" (1984). Hastings Law News. Book 132. http://repository.uchastings.edu/hln/132 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the UC Hastings Archives and History at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law News by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hastings College of the Law Nov. Dec. 1984 SUPREME COURT'S SEVEN DEADLY SINS "To construe and build the law - especially constitutional law - is 4. Inviting the tyranny of small decisions: When the Court looks at a prior decision to choose the kind of people we will be," Laurence H. Tribe told a and decides it is only going a little step further a!ld therefore doing no harm, it is look- ing at its feet to see how far it has gone. These small steps sometimes reduce people to standing-room-only audience at Hastings on October 18, 1984. Pro- things. fessor Tribe, Tyler Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard, gave 5. Ol'erlooking the constitutil'e dimension 0/ gOl'ernmental actions and what they the 1984 Mathew O. Tobriner Memorial Lecture on the topic of "The sa)' about lIS as a people and a nation: Constitutional decisions alter the scale of what Court as Calculator: the Budgeting of Rights." we constitute, and the Court should not ignore this element.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Distinguished Alumni List
    Community College League of California Distinguished Alumni Awardees Allan Hancock College 1988 - Robert Mange - Principal, Folsom Junior High School 2002 - Owen W. Siler - Admiral, United States Coast Guard (Retired) 2010 - Kay Ryan - Poet Laureate, Consultant in Poetry (emeritus) American River College 2016 - Diane Bryant - Executive Vice President/General Manager, Data Center Group, Intel Corporation Bakersfield College 1964 - Walter W. Stiern - Senator, State of California 1969 - David E. Smith - Medical Director, Haight-Ashbury Medical Clinic 1971 - Ruth Love Holloway - Director, Right to Read Program, US Office of Education 1973 - Jack C. Smith - Columnist, Los Angeles Times 2005 - Beto Gonzalez - Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, U.S. Department of Education Barstow College 2000 - Gloria Romero - Assembly Majority Whip 49th District 2010 - Joe Baca - Congressman, United States Congress Butte College 2000 - Kenneth Grossman - President Sierra Nevada Brewing Cañada College 1994 - Anna G. Eschoo - Member of Congress, 14th Congressional District Cerritos College 1985 - JoJo Starbuck - Olympic and Professional Figure Skater 2015 - Peter Espinoza - Judge, Los Angeles County Superior Court Chabot College 1992 - Tom Hanks - Actor 1996 - Peggy Hora - Judge, Municipal Court 2003 - Marcy Feit - President & CEO, ValleyCare Health Systems Chaffey College 1972 - William A. Walk, Jr. - Attorney and Civic Leader 1985 - Howard Allen - Chairman of the Board, Southern California Edison 1995 - Hebert Hafif - Attorney at Law 2006 - Beverly Cleary - Author Citrus College 1980 - Gordon L. Hough - Chair of the Board, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph 1990 - Ward Munson - President (Retired), Munson Sporting Goods 2014 - Ivan Misner - Founder and Chairman, BNI City College of San Francisco 1969 - George J. Maslach - Dean of Engineering, UC Berkeley 1973 - Andrew S.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Recall History Is a Chronological Listing of Every
    Complete List of Recall Attempts This is a chronological listing of every attempted recall of an elected state official in California. For the purposes of this history, a recall attempt is defined as a Notice of Intention to recall an official that is filed with the Secretary of State’s Office. 1913 Senator Marshall Black, 28th Senate District (Santa Clara County) Qualified for the ballot, recall succeeded Vote percentages not available Herbert C. Jones elected successor Senator Edwin E. Grant, 19th Senate District (San Francisco County) Failed to qualify for the ballot 1914 Senator Edwin E. Grant, 19th Senate District (San Francisco County) Qualified for the ballot, recall succeeded Vote percentages not available Edwin I. Wolfe elected successor Senator James C. Owens, 9th Senate District (Marin and Contra Costa counties) Qualified for the ballot, officer retained 1916 Assemblyman Frank Finley Merriam Failed to qualify for the ballot 1939 Governor Culbert L. Olson Failed to qualify for the ballot Governor Culbert L. Olson Filed by Olson Recall Committee Failed to qualify for the ballot Governor Culbert L. Olson Filed by Citizens Olson Recall Committee Failed to qualify for the ballot 1940 Governor Culbert L. Olson Filed by Olson Recall Committee Failed to qualify for the ballot Governor Culbert L. Olson Filed by Olson Recall Committee Failed to qualify for the ballot 1960 Governor Edmund G. Brown Filed by Roderick J. Wilson Failed to qualify for the ballot 1 Complete List of Recall Attempts 1965 Assemblyman William F. Stanton, 25th Assembly District (Santa Clara County) Filed by Jerome J. Ducote Failed to qualify for the ballot Assemblyman John Burton, 20th Assembly District (San Francisco County) Filed by John Carney Failed to qualify for the ballot Assemblyman Willie L.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN LEGAL Hrstory
    WESTERN LEGAL HrSTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 20, NUMBERS 1 & 2 2007 Western Legal History is published semiannually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 125 S. Grand Avenue, Pasadena, California 91105, (626) 795-0266/fax (626) 229-7476. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts- particularly the federal courts-in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the NJCHS as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all, Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (nonmembers of the bench and bar, lawyers in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other society publications and programs, please write or telephone the editor. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 125 S. Grand Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of endnotes. Copyright 02007, Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society ISSN 0896-2189 The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court Volume 30
    REPORTS OF CASES DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 8, 1981, TO MARCH 1, 1982 ROBERT E. fORMICHI Reporter of Decisions VOLUME 30 - 3d San Francisco BANCROFT-WHITNEY COMPANY 1982 In Memoriam HONORABLE WILEY W. MANUEL Judge of the Superior Court of Alameda County, 1976-1977; Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of California, 1977-1981. The Supreme Court of California met in its courtroom, State Build­ ing, San Francisco, California, January 28, 1981. Present: Chief Justice Bird, presiding; Associate Justices Tobriner, Mosk, Richardson, Newman and Clark. Gill, Clerk; Williams and Rod­ gers, Bailiffs. CHIEF JusTICE BIRD: We meet this afternoon to pay tribute to the memory of Justice Wiley W. Manuel, who served with distinction as an associate justice of our court from March 24, 1977, to January 5, 1981. On behalf of the court, I welcome Justice Manuel's widow and his fam­ ily here today. In order to give the speakers as much time as possible for their re­ marks, I will simply spread upon the record today, by way of reference, the comments I made on behalf of the court at Justice Manuel's funer­ al.* Justice Stanley Mosk will be our first speaker this afternoon. Justice Mosk. Justice Mosk: Chief Justice Bird, my colleagues, members of the family and friends of Wiley Manuel. It would be easy to become emotional or maudlin about our departed colleague, Justice Wiley Manuel. I will resist that temptation and be brief: he was a kind, gentle, warm human being whom every one of us on this court loved like our own brother.
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Reprising a Finale Or an Overture? Gerald F
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1987 Commentary: Are We Reprising a Finale or an Overture? Gerald F. Uelmen Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Recommended Citation 61 S. Cal. L. Rev. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENTARY: ARE WE REPRISING A FINALE OR AN OVERTURE? BY GERALD F. UELMEN* I found reading Professor Thompson's paper a bit like looking through a knothole. Everything is explained in terms of California events. While California is frequently the precursor of national trends, the conflict between judicial independence and judicial accountability transcends local boundaries. The events of 1986 were strongly influ- enced by trends that are literally sweeping our nation. When viewed from that broader perspective, the 1986 election can be seen as an over- ture, rather than a finale as orchestrated by Professor Thompson. Before I explain that conclusion, however, I have a few quibbles with Professor Thompson's libretto, as well as his casting of characters. (1) Quibble Number One: Justice Matthew Tobriner should not be cast as the Machiavelli of judicial activism. After hanging around Gideon Kanner so long,1 I was beginning to share the belief that Tobri- ner's "Can Young Lawyers Reform Society Through the Courts?"2 was some sort of manifesto for the due process revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Jerry Brown 2.0: Judicial Appointments, Now New and Improved
    Governor Jerry Brown 2.0: Judicial Appointments, Now New And Improved In this article we evaluate two points held by today’s conventional wisdom. One posits that Jerry Brown has, in his second stint as governor, been slow to fill judicial vacancies, and that there is an unusually high number of open judicial seats. The other is a suspicion that the judicial appointments by Governor Brown version 2.0 will be in the style of Governor Brown version 1.0. Our evaluation is that both theories are empirically less than true. (Recognizing that the first Governor Brown was Jerry Brown’s father Pat Brown, for convenience we will ignore that fact.) To the first point about vacancies, the available data does support several conclusions. The number of empty Superior Court seats in California began to increase significantly, coinciding with the beginning of the second Brown administration in January 2011. Presently, the average number of Superior Court vacancies since January 2011 is 63.5—compared with seven such vacancies in January 2011, the month the second Brown administration began. After an initial spike, the number of Superior Court vacancies has remained consistent over the course of Brown’s administration. But the available data does not strongly support the conclusion that the average number of vacancies is unusually high. Nor does it conclusively establish that the present Brown administration is slower or faster than other governors in filling vacancies. To the second point about appointee characteristics, there is no question that the justices appointed to the California Supreme Court during the first Brown administration were novel and in some cases controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Frank C. Newman
    California State Archives State Government Oral History Program Oral History Interview with FRANK C. NEWMAN Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley, 1946-present Justice, California Supreme Court, 1977--1983 January 24, Februrary 7, March 30, November 28, 1989; April 16, May 7, June 10, June 18, June 24, July 11, 1991 Berkeley, California By Carole Hicke Regional Oral History Office University of California, Berkeley RESTRICTIONS ON THIS INTERVIEW None. LITERARY RIGHTS AND QUOTATIONS This manuscript is hereby made available for research purposes only. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the California State Archivist or Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to: California State Archives 201 N. Sunrise Avenue Roseville, California 95661 or Regional Oral History Office 486 Library University of California Berkeley, California 94720 The request should include information of the specific passages and identification of the user. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: Frank C. Newman, Oral History Interview, Conducted 1989 and 1991 by Carole Hicke, Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley, for the California State Archives State Government Oral History Program. California State Archives (916) 773-3000 Office of the Secretary of State 201 No. Sunrise Avenue (FAX) 773-8249 March Fong Eu Sacramento, California 95661 PREFACE On September 25, 1985, Governor George Deukmejian signed into law A.B. 2104 (Chapter 965 of the Statutes of 1985). This legislation established, under the administration of the California State Archives, a State Government Oral History Program "to provide through the use of oral history a continuing documentation of state policy development as reflected in California's legislative and executive history." The following interview is one of a series of oral histories undertaken for inclusion in the state program.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCHS Newsletter, Fall/Winter 2011
    At the ceremony held on July 7, 2011 in the Great Hall of the Hiram Johnson State Building in San Francisco to present a framed resolution of the Judicial Council are: (Left to right) William Vickrey, Administrative Director of the Courts, since retired; Frances M. Jones, Director of the California Judicial Center Library; Mrs. Eleanor Manuel, wife of the first African-American to serve on the California Supreme Court, the late Justice Wiley Manuel; Ronald Overholt, Interim Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts; Associate Justice Timothy Reardon of the First District Court of Appeal; Judge Winifred Younge Smith of the Superior Court of Alameda County; and Mr. Michael Thompson, son of the late Court of Appeal Associate Justice Leon Thompson. Photo: Rita Mah, Administrative Office of the Courts “. And Justice For All” Celebrating 50 years of Service by California African-American Justices, 1961-2011 Frances M. Jones* Our children must never lose their zeal for visits to the State Capitol’s Rotunda each year. Project building a better world. They must not be volunteer Dia Poole’s2 work with the Administrative discouraged from aspiring toward greatness, for Office of the Courts’ Black History Month Commit- tee led to collaboration with the California Legislative they are to be the leaders of tomorrow. Black Caucus, and to the development of an exhibit in the Rotunda honoring the service of seventeen out- From “My Last Will and Testament” by Mary McLeod Bethune. standing African-American jurists on the California Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal. When planners also observed that the year 2011 he exhibit, “.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall / Winter 2003 Newsletter
    THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT Historical Society_ NEWSLETTER AUTUMN/W I NTER 2003 A Colleague's Fond Memories of California 1 Former staffers fondly Supreme Court Justice Marcus Kaufman re member their beloved Justice Kaufman. Invariably BY JOY CE KENNARD they talk about his thought fulness and hi s loyalty. Associate J ustice Marcus M. Kaufman was appointed Beverly Gong, his fo rmer to the Court by Governor George Deukrnejian in and my cu rrent secretary, 1987,following the retention election in 1986.)ustice has described how, after he Kaufman grew up in Los Angeles, obtained his bache­ h ad announced his retire lor's degree from UCLA and graduated first in his law men t fr om the state high school class at USC in 19 5 6. Afier clerking for then­ court in 1990, Marc lob­ Associate Justice Roger]. Traynor, Kaiifman entered l_ __,J bied his successor, Justice private practice. In 1970, he was appointed to the Armand Arabian, to retain Marc's staff attorneys. Fourth District Court of Appeal in San Bernardino, When Justice Arabian said he would, Marc walked where he served until being named to the state's highest into Beverly's office and called his wife to tell her the court. Justice Kaufman retired from th e Supreme good news. Beverly recalled that there we re tears of Co urt in 1990 and returned to private practice in relief on his face. Southern California. A couple of weeks earlier, Marc had lobbied me to They say that true death is to be eternally fo rgot­ fill a vacant chief-of-staff position with one of his staff ten.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilsoaklandmayor00lionrich.Pdf
    University of California Berkeley Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California University of California Black Alumni Series Lionel Wilson ATTORNEY, JUDGE, AND OAKLAND MAYOR With an Introduction by Professor Edward J . Blakely Interviews Conducted by Gabrielle Morris in 1985, 1990 Copyright (c) 1992 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a modern research technique involving an interviewee and an informed interviewer in spontaneous conversation. The taped record is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The resulting manuscript is typed in final form, indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Lionel Wilson dated August 29, 1990. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary & Secondary Sources
    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
    [Show full text]