Mississippi Bubble (1716 - 20) the Mississippi Bubble Was an Ill-Conceived Financial Scheme Hatched out of the Financial Woes of a Highly-Indebted France

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mississippi Bubble (1716 - 20) the Mississippi Bubble Was an Ill-Conceived Financial Scheme Hatched out of the Financial Woes of a Highly-Indebted France The Mississippi Bubble (1716 - 20) The Mississippi Bubble was an ill-conceived financial scheme hatched out of the financial woes of a highly-indebted France. Aimed at solving France’s debt crisis, the initiative triggered a financial mania which, like all poorly conceived financial schemes, ended in financial collapse, economic depression and heartbreak for many. The central players in the scheme were the Duc d’Orleans (Duke of Orleans) and his long-time friend John Law, a Scottish economist who was the architect of the scheme. Law was an interesting character. His father was a goldsmith who lent money on the side. He worked as an apprentice in his father’s business and he became well versed in finance. He soon moved to England where he pursued his passion for women, drinking and gambling. In 1694, he was challenged to a duel over the affections of a young damsel and in the ensuing fight he killed his opponent with a single thrust of his sword. He was arrested and sentenced to death, and whilst awaiting execution his sentence was downgraded from murder to manslaughter.i Law managed to escape prison and quickly fled to Europe where he put his extraordinary mathematical skills to use, earning a living by playing at the gambling houses throughout the major centres of Europe. Law also continued to pursue his economic interests, arguing that tying up wealth in land and specie stunted economic growth as it did not allow money to circulate freely through the economy. Instead, he supported the creation of a central bank which issued paper currency and credit backed by land, gold and silver. Law would soon get the opportunity to put his theories into practice when he was approached by his old gambling buddy, the Duc d’Orleans, who had been appointed regent to the young French monarch, Louis XV on the death of the Sun King Louis XIV. Years of endless wars and extravagant spending on projects such as construction of the Palace of Versailles had brought France to the brink of bankruptcy. The government had financed this largesse by issuing high-interest bearing government (junk) bonds, but time was running out as creditors were becoming restless. Law wasted little time in getting to work, instituting a series of economic reforms which included reviving overseas commerce, building new roads and abolishing tolls on roads and canals. His most radical reform, however, occurred in 1716 with the establishment of a government-chartered private bank, the Banque Générale, with a capital of 6 million livres.ii The bank was nationalised in 1718 and renamed the Banque Royale. He also moved quickly to implement his paper-based monetary policies through several state-mandated measures. These included issuing shares in the new bank in exchange for old government bonds, whilst accepting deposits in specie (coins) and issuing all loans and subsequent withdrawals using the new Banque Générale bank notes. Law sought to build confidence amongst his investors and the French public by insisting that his notes would be redeemed in specie at face value. Duc d’Orleans then mandated that all taxes be paid using the Bank’s notes, in effect making the Bank’s notes legal tender. France was no longer constrained by a shortage of gold and silver.iii 1 of 3 The era of paper currencies and fractional reserve banking had started in earnest as the new bank became one of only six such banks to have issued paper money, joining Sweden, England, Holland, Venice and Genoa.iv Just as Law had predicted, the increase in money supply began to stimulate the real economy as confidence returned, savings were liberated, and money began to circulate through the economy. With his reputation in the ascendancy, Law began to expand his empire by obtaining a monopoly over trading rights with France’s overseas colonies. Initially, this included France’s extensive holdings over La Louisiane (Louisiana) in North America – holdings that constituted almost one-third of the land mass of the U.S., but it went on to include trading rights to the West Indies, South America, China and East India. He also secured the right to mint royal coins and was appointed the royal tax collector for a period of 9 years.v He could do no wrong. Law set up a joint stock company, the Mississippi Company, to fund his ventures. Initially he offered shares solely in exchange for the Crown’s remaining junk bonds but then he went public. In 1719, Law issued 50,000 new shares in the Mississippi Company at 550 livres each, with just 75 livres down and the rest due in nineteen monthly payments of 25 livres.vi Law did such an amazing job of hyping the wealth potential of his alligator-infested U.S. swampland – land that had never returned anything of value to previous French companies - that people queued for hours outside the company’s headquarters just to see whether their applications for additional stock had been successful. In what became known as John Law’s Mississippi Bubble, a speculative bubble of historic proportions had begun. The share price rose to 1,000 livres before the second installment was even due, and ordinary citizens flocked to Paris to participate. Based on this success, Law offered to pay off the national debt of 1.5 billion livres by issuing an additional 300,000 shares at 500 livres paid in ten monthly installments.vii By mid-1719, the Mississippi Company had issued more than 600,000 shares and the par value of the company stood at 300 million livres. That summer, the share price skyrocketed from 1,000 to 5,000 livres and it continued to rise through year-end, ultimately reaching dizzying heights of 15,000 livres per share. The word millionaire was first used, and in January 1720, Law was appointed Controller General.viii The mania was fueled by the Banque Royale, which, unshackled by any constraints associated with shortages of gold and silver, issued an unlimited number of bank notes to fund the purchase of shares in the Mississippi Company. Not surprisingly, the massive increase in bank notes to fund stock purchases quickly doubled France’s money supply. This inevitably stoked the flames of inflation, particularly in food prices, and by January 1720 inflation had reached a rate of 23% per month.ix By early 1720, stocks began to fall as savvier investors began to cash in their shares in exchange for gold coins. To slow the sell-off and to preserve the holdings of gold and silver in the bank vaults, Law restricted the payment in gold to 100 livres, with the rest of the payments being made in bank notes. 2 of 3 Despite the plentiful supply of paper money, with declining confidence, investors headed for the exits and with few willing buyers, stock prices collapsed. By May 1720, prices fell to 4,000 livres per share, a 73% decrease within a year. The rush to convert paper money to coins led to sporadic bank hours and riots. x By late 1720, Law’s enemies moved en masse, demanding payment immediately and in specie. Within days the French Government confessed that the number of bank notes issued by Banque Royale far exceeded the amount of gold and silver on hand. The bank was forced to stop payment on its notes.xi Unfortunately, by this time events had moved too far, and France was left with the worst of both worlds. On the one hand, everyday people were suffering from runaway inflation that was punishing the community through rising prices. On the other hand, stock holders were financially devastated as stock prices collapsed. The collapse of the Mississippi Company plunged France and surrounding Europe into the inevitable deflationary depression. Over 1 million French families had purchased Law’s now worthless shares. His paper money was valueless. The middle and upper classes were ruined, the monarchy discredited, and the French economy was a basket case.xii The seeds for the French Revolution some 60 years later had just been sown. Law’s experiment with paper currency and money printing had failed, just as every other experiment with paper-based money would also fail. i Adams, Gavin John (2012). Letters to John Law. Newton Page. p. xxi ii http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=26139 iii http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=26139 iv Federal Reserve Bank of New York: "Crisis Chronicles: The Mississippi Bubble of 1720 and the European Debt Crisis" (Narron and Skeie) v http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=26139 vi http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/01/crisis-chronicles-the-mississippi-bubble-of-1720- and-the-european-debt-crisis.html vii Federal Reserve Bank of New York: "Crisis Chronicles: The Mississippi Bubble of 1720 and the European Debt Crisis" (Narron and Skeie) viii Federal Reserve Bank of New York: "Crisis Chronicles: The Mississippi Bubble of 1720 and the European Debt Crisis" (Narron and Skeie) ix http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/articles/70/ x https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Law_(economist) xi http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=26139 xii http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ArticleId=26139 3 of 3 .
Recommended publications
  • Early Speculative Bubbles and Increases in the Supply of Money
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1991 Early speculative bubbles and increases in the supply of money Douglas Edward French University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation French, Douglas Edward, "Early speculative bubbles and increases in the supply of money" (1991). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 167. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/h29l-bf64 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Direito
    Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito THE GLOBAL EVOLUTION OF CORPORATE LAW: LESSONS FROM BRAZIL Mariana Pargendler Tese apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Doutor em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, em co-tutela com a Yale Law School. Orientadores: Carlos Klein Zanini (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) Henry Hansmann (Yale University) Porto Alegre, 2011 © 2011 by Mariana Pargendler All rights reserved. 2 To my parents, Maria Isabel and Ari, and to Carlos. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the product of the collaboration between two law faculties in different hemispheres: the Yale Law School in the United States and the School of Law of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) in Brazil. Professors Judith Martins-Costa, Carlos Klein Zanini, and Henry Hansmann have supported this joint enterprise since its inception, and for that I am most appreciative. The present work has benefited enormously from the resulting dialogue between these different legal cultures and styles of legal scholarship. I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Henry Hansmann, who has been the most inspiring, dedicated, and generous academic mentor possible. I am deeply honored and humbled for the privilege of both receiving his invaluable guidance throughout the elaboration of this thesis and collaborating on other academic projects during my doctoral studies. I am also extremely grateful to my co-supervisor, Professor Carlos Klein Zanini. To him I owe not only the completion of this dissertation but also, as my first Business Organizations professor, my interest in corporate law that has accompanied me ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • Crises in the Global Economy from Tulips to Today
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Globalization in Historical Perspective Volume Author/Editor: Michael D. Bordo, Alan M. Taylor and Jeffrey G. Williamson, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-06598-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bord03-1 Conference Date: May 3-6, 2001 Publication Date: January 2003 Title: Crises in the Global Economy from Tulips to Today Author: Larry D. Neal, Marc D. Weidenmier URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9596 10 Crises in the Global Economy from Tulips to Today Contagion and Consequences Larry Neal and Marc Weidenmier 10.1 Introduction As the global financial system has evolved since 1971, financial histori- ans have become increasingly struck by similarities between the stresses and setbacks that have occurred in international financial markets and those that plagued earlier attempts at creating a global financial system. The decade of the 1990s was beset by exchange rate crises in Asia and melt- downs of emerging markets in the former centrally planned economies. Likewise, the decade of the 1890s a century earlier saw a series of financial crises that threatened to become systemic at times. Just as the booming U.S. capital markets in the late 1990s seemed to help stabilize the international financial system at the time, so did the flurry of new activity in the London Stock Exchange promote a rise of international liquidity in the late 1890s. Just as leading commentators on the state of financial markets at the end of the twentieth century argued that the provision of liquidity to financial markets by the actions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Evidence on the First Financial Bubble
    New Evidence on the First Financial Bubble Rik G. P. Frehen, Tilburg University William N. Goetzmann, Yale School of Management & NBER K. Geert Rouwenhorst, Yale School of Management June 27, 2011 Abstract The first global financial bubbles occurred in 1720 in France, Great-Britain and the Netherlands. Explanations for these linked bubbles primarily focus on the irrationality of investor speculation and the corresponding stock price behavior of two large firms: the South Sea Company in Great Britain and the Mississippi Company in France. In this paper we collect and examine a broad cross-section of security price data to evaluate the causes of the bubbles. Using newly available stock prices for British and Dutch firms in 1720, we find evidence against indiscriminate irrational exuberance and evidence in favor of speculation about fundamental financial and economic innovations in the European economy. These factors include the emergent Atlantic trade, new institutional forms of risk sharing and the innovative potential of the joint-stock company form itself. These factors ultimately had long-lasting transformative economic effects which may have been anticipated by the markets at the time. We use the cross-sectional data to test the hypothesis that the bubble in 1720 was driven by innovation by dividing the London share market into “old” and “new” economy stocks. We find that firms associated with the Atlantic trade and with the new joint-stock insurance form had the highest price increases and had return dynamics consistent with current models of "New Economy" stocks. New, high frequency data allow us to pinpoint the date of the 1720 crash and track its international propagation JEL Classifications: G01, G15, N13, N23 Acknowledgements We thank the International Center for Finance at the Yale School of Management for research and travel support.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN LAW's BANQUE ROYALE and the MISSISSIPPI BUBBLE John E
    JOHN LAW'S BANQUE ROYALE AND THE MISSISSIPPI BUBBLE John E. Sandrock John Law – Monetary Reformer In the annals of history John Law has been called everything from financial genius to swindler and con man extraordinarie. Law is renowned for more than his unique economic theories, however. History has labeled him at various times Scottish economist, gambler, banker, murderer, royal advisor, rake, adventurer and exile. So what is the truth about this man who made many entrepreneurs rich and left many more financially ruined? Were the schemes he devised ingenious and based on sound economic principles, or was he an unbalanced visionary? Was he benefactor or villain? We will explore these questions to seek the true measure of the man. Law was born in 1671 at Edinburgh, Scotland to a wealthy family of goldsmiths. At age fourteen he joined the family business, studying banking under his father's tutelage. John was sent to London to continue his education. While there he was blinded by London's social side, choosing to abandon study for more extravagant pursuits. Law had a passion for women and gambling. He was a brilliant mental calculator, known to win card games by mentally calculating the odds. These follies eventually led him to lose sizable sums of money gambling. That was not the worst of it, however, as he also killed a man in a duel over the affections on one Elizabeth Villiers. Found guilty of murder, Law was imprisoned and sentenced to death. His sentence was eventually commuted to manslaughter and a fine. While still in prison he managed to escape England, fleeing to the continent of Europe in 1694.
    [Show full text]
  • The Railroads, 1830-1850. Merl Elwyn Reed Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1957 Louisiana's Transportation Revolution: the Railroads, 1830-1850. Merl Elwyn Reed Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Reed, Merl Elwyn, "Louisiana's Transportation Revolution: the Railroads, 1830-1850." (1957). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 223. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/223 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COFZRIGHTED BI MX&L KLWCM RKED 195# LOtJISIAHA'S TRANSPORTATION RBTOLtJTiar* THS RAILROADS, 1830 - 1890 A Thesla Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of tha Louiaiana State Unlveraity and Agricultural and Neohanloal College in partial fulfillment of the requir amenta for the degree of Doctor of Fhiloaophy in The Department of Hietory hr Marl Slujm Reed M.A., Syraouae Unlreraity, 1952 Auguat, 1997 AGDfOULSDOKMOra In the preparation of this thesis, the writer was grateful for the cooperation and aid of Mr. Vprgll L. Bedaole and Staff of the Department of Arbhivea, Mis a Lucy Foot* of the Louiaiana Room, Hill Memorial Library, Mr a. William J, Griffith of Tulane Unlreraity Ar­ chives, Howard-Tilton Memorial Library, and the Staff of the News­ paper Department, Hew Orleans Public Library. He la also moat appreciative of the encouragement and sugges­ tions given by Professor T. Harry Williams, under whose direction the monograph was begun, and by Profeasor Prank Vandiver, who direc­ ted the thesis during its later stages and offered valuable criti­ cism throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Bubbles in History
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Quinn, William; Turner, John D. Working Paper Bubbles in history QUCEH Working Paper Series, No. 2020-07 Provided in Cooperation with: Queen's University Centre for Economic History (QUCEH), Queen's University Belfast Suggested Citation: Quinn, William; Turner, John D. (2020) : Bubbles in history, QUCEH Working Paper Series, No. 2020-07, Queen's University Centre for Economic History (QUCEH), Belfast This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224837 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu QUCEH WORKING PAPER SERIES http://www.quceh.org.uk/working-papers BUBBLES IN HISTORY William Quinn (Queen’s University Belfast) John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous First Bubbles Author(S): Peter M
    American Economic Association Famous First Bubbles Author(s): Peter M. Garber Source: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, No. 2 (Spring, 1990), pp. 35-54 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942889 Accessed: 08/10/2010 15:45 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aea. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Economic Perspectives. http://www.jstor.org Journal of EconomicPerspectives- Volume4, Number2- Spring 1990 -Pages 35-54 Famous First Bubbles Peter M.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Irrational Behaviour During the South Sea Bubble1 by RICHARD S
    Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Oxford, UK and Malden, USAEHRThe Economic History Review0013-0117Economic History Society 20052005LVIII2233271ArticlesIRRATIONAL BEHAVIOUR DURING THE SOUTH SEA BUBBLERICHARD S. DALE, JOHNNIE E. V. JOHNSON, AND LEILEI TANG Economic History Review, LVIII, 2 (2005), pp. 233–271 Financial markets can go mad: evidence of irrational behaviour during the South Sea Bubble1 By RICHARD S. DALE, JOHNNIE E. V. JOHNSON, and LEILEI TANG he volatility of world stock markets in recent years has been the subject T of considerable debate. At one extreme there are those who argue that these fluctuations have resulted from shifts in fundamental values, others focus on the actions of rational investors confronted with new, fast-changing information and, at the other extreme, there are those who blame investor irrationality. Thaler suggests that an important conclusion to emerge from the behavioural finance literature is that the resolution of these debates is more likely ‘if we learn more about the behavior of people who operate in these markets’.2 To this end, this paper explores whether investors can be prone to bouts of irrational speculative mania. Investor behaviour is examined during a period when market prices systematically deviate from fundamental values; that is, during a bubble. Specifically, the paper focuses on one of the most famous bubbles, that associated with the rise and fall of the South Sea Company during 1720. The causes of this bubble have attracted considerable academic debate, since it formed an important part of the first major speculative boom and bust in European stock markets, and its aftermath has had a considerable impact on financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise Financial History of Europe
    A Concise Financial History of Europe Financial History A Concise A Concise Financial History of Europe www.robeco.com Cover frontpage: Cover back page: The city hall of Amsterdam from 1655, today’s Royal Palace, Detail of The Money Changer and His Wife, on Dam Square, where the Bank of Amsterdam was located. 1514, Quentin Matsys. A Concise Financial History of Europe Learning from the innovations of the early bankers, traders and fund managers by taking a historical journey through Europe’s main financial centers. Jan Sytze Mosselaar © 2018 Robeco, Rotterdam AMSTERDAM 10 11 12 13 21 23 BRUGGE 7 LONDON 14 19 DUTCH REPUBLIC 15 8 ANTWERP 16 18 20 17 PARIS 22 24 25 9 VENICE GENOA 2 5 PIsa 1 3 FLORENCE 4 SIENA 6 25 DEFINING MOMENts IN EUROPeaN FINANCIAL HIstOry Year City Chapter 1 1202 Publication of Liber Abaci Pisa 1 2 1214 Issuance of first transferable government debt Genoa 1 3 1340 The “Great Crash of 1340” Florence 2 4 1397 Foundation of the Medici Bank Florence 2 5 1408 Opening of Banco di San Giorgio Genoa 1 6 1472 Foundation of the Monte di Paschi di Siena Siena 1 7 1495 First mention of ‘de Beurs’ in Brugge Brugge 3 8 1531 New Exchange opens in Antwerp Antwerp 3 9 1587 Foundation of Banco di Rialto Venice 1 10 1602 First stock market IPO Amsterdam 5 11 1609 First short squeeze and stock market regulation Amsterdam 5 12 1609 Foundation of Bank of Amsterdam Amsterdam 4 13 1688 First book on stock markets published Amsterdam 5 14 1688 Glorious & Financial Revolution London 6 15 1694 Foundation of Bank of England London 6 16 1696 London’s
    [Show full text]
  • Stocks & Bondage
    Quarterly Market Outlook & Strategy Stocks & Bondage Second Quarter of 2020 Karen Parker Feld July 2020 Executive Summary • Central banks are trying desperately to manage the financial monster they created. As Fed Chairman Jay Powell acknowledged in a recent 60 Minutes interview, our monetary authority is now digitally “printing” money in order to purchase securities, and sees no limit on how far it can or should go in that endeavor. • The Fed is encouraging further accumulation of debt by firms that are, for all practical purposes, already insolvent. Unfortunately, each time our leaders kick the debt can down the road, they intensify the adverse impact of these liabilities on growth, and raise the threat level of the next crisis. What makes the current situation unique in history is policymakers’ success in fostering a speculative frenzy amid the worst economic and social conditions since 1932. • Those who have been tracking this policy folly to its logical conclusion apprehend that the only way the Fed can avoid a catastrophic outcome is by assuming broad control over financial markets—with terrible consequences for capitalism and democracy. • It's difficult to imagine a happy scenario in which investors can exit from the dangerous corner into which the Fed has painted them. We think three unhappy—and mutually reinforcing—outcomes are plausible. Under the first (and most likely) scenario, the Fed is pressured to extend its monetary largesse to the general public, producing an eventual inflation surprise. Stagflation is the worst macro environment for asset prices, although commodities, real estate and emerging market assets typically outperform.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Ownership in France: the Importance of History
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers Volume Author/Editor: Randall K. Morck, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-53680-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/morc05-1 Conference Date: June 21-22, 2003 Publication Date: November 2005 Title: Corporate Ownership in France: The Importance of History Author: Antoin Murphy URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10270 3 Corporate Ownership in France The Importance of History Antoin E. Murphy The French model of corporate ownership and control is quite distinct from the Anglo-American model. It has been described as an insider model because it contains a high degree of concentration of ownership, while the wider dispersion of ownership characterized by the U.K. and U.S. models has been termed an outsider model. Why are there such widely differing models between France, and, indeed, many Continental European coun- tries, on the one hand, and the United States and the United Kingdom, on the other? La Porta, López-de-Silanes, and Shleifer (1998) have advanced the view that ownership in capital markets is concentrated where there is an absence of strong investor protection embodied in the legal system and regulatory arrangements. La Porta and coauthors highlight the role of contemporary institutions but downplay, aside from legal developments, the role of historical factors in shaping the structure of capital markets. More recently La Porta et al. (2000) asserted that “Common law countries have the strongest protection of outside investors—both shareholders and creditors—whereas French civil law countries have the weakest protec- tion” (p.
    [Show full text]