DOCSLIB.ORG

The Foundation Year of Samaria-Sebaste and Its Chronological Implications*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Foundation Year of Samaria-Sebaste and Its Chronological Implications* 1374-08_Anc_Soc38_08_Mahieu 30-10-2008 15:03 Pagina 183 THE FOUNDATION YEAR OF SAMARIA-SEBASTE AND ITS CHRONOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS* Abstract: This paper considers the foundation year of Samaria-Sebaste and the implications it has for the chronology of some related events. In doing so, a new time setting will be proposed for three topics: 1) the grant of Trachonitis, Batanea and Auranitis; 2) the Syrian governors Varro and Cicero the Younger; and 3) the departure of Alexander and Aristobulus IV for Rome. 1. THE FOUNDATION YEAR OF SAMARIA-SEBASTE The historical background of Sebaste’s foundation In 40 BC, Antony and Octavian proclaimed Herod king (B.J. I 282- 285; A.J. XIV 377-389), but Herod was principally Antony’s ally. When Octavian defeated Antony at the Battle of Actium on 2 September 31 BC1, Herod found himself in a precarious position. Tactfully, he rendered him- self to Rhodes to submit himself to Octavian2. He openly confessed his former loyalty to Antony and expressed his hope for Octavian’s good- will (B.J. I 386-390; A.J. XV 187-193). Octavian appreciated Herod’s sincerity and thus confirmed him in his rule (B.J. I 391-393; A.J. XV 194-195). When Octavian had captured Alexandria on 1 August 30 BC3, Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide soon thereafter4. In the aftermath, Herod rendered himself to Egypt where Octavian conferred several favours upon Herod, among which was the grant of Samaria (B.J. I 396-397; A.J. XV 217)5. In recognition of Octavian’s benefits, Herod decided to rebuild the * The present study is part of my paper «The Conventional Chronology of Herod the Great: Rock or Sand?», presented at the Josephus Colloquium Flavius Josephus: Author, Editor or Historian?, held at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Human- ities and Social Sciences, Wassenaar, 2-4 June 2008. 1 The Actian campaign took place when Messalla and Caesar were consuls (Dio Cassius L 10.2) = 31 BC (SAMUEL, Chronology, p. 267). Augustus’ victory took place on 2 September (Dio Cassius LI 1.1). 2 Octavian stayed on Rhodes in the first half of 30 BC: FITZLER & SEECK, Augustus, col. 333. 3 KIENAST, Kaisertabelle, p. 62. 4 FITZLER & SEECK, Augustus, col. 335-336; SCHÜRER, History I, p. 302. 5 The exact significance of Samaria’s grant is unclear given that Herod possessed Samaria already before (B.J. I 213, 229, 302, 344; A.J. XIV 284, 411, 413, 467; Appian, Bell. civ. V 75, see OTTO, Herodes I, col. 18). Several proposals have been made in order to explain this apparent contradiction. OTTO, Herodes I, col. 49, 55, proposes that the grant Ancient Society 38, 183-196. doi: 10.2143/AS.38.0.2033275 © 2008 by Ancient Society. All rights reserved. 1374-08_Anc_Soc38_08_Mahieu 30-10-2008 15:03 Pagina 184 184 B. MAHIEU city Samaria and to dedicate it to Octavian-Augustus, changing its name into Sebaste (B.J. I 403; A.J. XV 292-298, Greek Sebastóv = Latin Augustus). The year of Sebaste’s foundation As to the foundation date of Sebaste, it certainly happened after 16 January 27 BC, the day Octavian received the title Augustus6. Numismatic evidence helps to fix the foundation year more precisely7: (1) The Roman emperor Commodus (180-192 AD) minted in year 216 of the local Sebastian era. Commodus was assassinated on 31 December 192 AD8. Therefore, year one of Sebaste started at the latest in 24 BC (215 years earlier). (2) In year 226 of the local Sebastian era, the Roman emperor Caracalla (198-211 AD) — who ruled contemporaneously with his father Septim- ius Severus (193-211 AD) — issued a coin very similar to a die used on the occasion of Sebaste’s becoming a Roman colony, which thus seems to have happened in the year 226. It is not known for sure in which AD year Sebaste became a colony. As Septimius Severus stayed in the Syr- ian province in the summer of 199 AD and again from late 200 AD until early 2029, the years 199 and 201 seem possible. If it was in 199 AD, year one of Sebaste would start in 27 BC (225 years earlier); if in 201, year one would start in 25 BC. Most scholars opt for a foundation in 27 BC because Herod likely ded- icated the city to Augustus shortly after Octavian had received the title Augustus10. Only some scholars prefer the year 25 BC11. The latter option signifies the abolition of tribute which Herod had paid for Samaria until then (Appian, Bell. civ. V 75). SCHALIT, Herodes, p. 161, 162 n. 64, argues that somewhere between 39 and 30 BC Samaria was given to Cleopatra and then remitted to Herod in 30 BC. JONES, Review, p. 229-230, tries to solve the dilemma by suggesting that Herod received the region Samaria in 39 BC but the city Samaria in 30. 6 FITZLER & SEECK, Augustus, col. 343; KIENAST, Kaisertabelle, p. 63. 7 BARAG, Castle, p. 16 n. 6. 8 KIENAST, Kaisertabelle, p. 148. 9 SPIELVOGEL, Severus, p. 120-122, 127-129. 10 OTTO, Herodes I, col. 53-54 n. *, 76-77 and n. *; HAEFELI, Cäsarea, p. 9; SCHALIT, Herodes, p. 358; SMALLWOOD, Jews, p. 77 n. 55; PRAUSE, Herodes, p. 354; GÜNTHER, Herodes, p. 258; WHITE, Herod, p. 376. BARAG, Castle, p. 16 n. 6, favours the year 27 BC because Severus gave Eleutheropolis (Beth Govrin, Idumea) and Diospolis (Lod, Judea) the titles L(enkía) Sep(timía) Seou(ría) in 199 or in 199/200 AD. Analogously, Severus would have made Sebaste a colony in 199 AD, which implies a foundation in 27 BC. 11 BMC 27, p. xxxix, noting that Severus’ foundation of Tyre likely dates to 201 AD; SCHÜRER, History I, p. 290 («25?»); I, p. 290-291 n. 9 (referring to the possibility of 27 BC, but finally opting for 25 BC); II, p. 163 («probably 25 B.C.»); SARTRE, Alexandre, p. 531. 1374-08_Anc_Soc38_08_Mahieu 30-10-2008 15:03 Pagina 185 THE FOUNDATION YEAR OF SAMARIA-SEBASTE 185 is sometimes influenced by Josephus’ statement in A.J. XV 299: «Now in this (same) year, which was the thirteenth of Herod’s reign, the greatest hardships came upon the country» (translation by Marcus and Wikgren). Given that the preceding passage A.J. XV 292-298 relates the foundation of Samaria-Sebaste, «in this (same) year» would imply that the founda- tion happened in Herod’s thirteenth year. Scholars assume that Herod’s years were reckoned from Nisan (March/April) 37 BC12, so that Herod’s thirteenth year is interpreted as the year Nisan 25/24 BC13. Thus, Samaria- Sebaste’s foundation would have happened in 25 BC. On the other hand, those who date Sebaste’s foundation to 27 BC assign only the hardships to the thirteenth year (and not Sebaste’s foundation)14. It seems indeed unjustified to prefer the year 25 BC above the year 27 BC merely on the basis of the expression katà toÕton mèn oŒn tòn êniautón in A.J. XV 299. With the majority of scholars, I adhere to the year 27 BC. The implications of this choice — in difference with Schürer’s option for the year 25 — will be worked out in the next sections. 2. THE GRANT OF TRACHONITIS, BATANEA AND AURANITIS A grant «after the first Actiad» According to the Jewish Antiquities, Alexander and Aristobulus IV15 were sent to Rome after Samaria-Sebaste had been founded (A.J. XV 342) and before Augustus granted the districts of Trachonitis, Batanea and Auranitis to Herod (A.J. XV 343). The Jewish War situates this grant «after the first period of the Actian era» (B.J. I 398 metà dè t®n prÉtjn ˆAktiáda, translation by Thackeray)16. Augustus’ victory at Actium on 2 September 31 BC was commemorated by quadrennial games17. Similar to an Olympiad, an Actiad was the period of four years between the games. Schürer makes the following assumptions: (1) the first Actian Games were held in September 28 BC (with subsequent games in 24, 20, 12 SCHÜRER, History I, p. 326-328 n. 165. 13 SCHÜRER, History I, p. 291. 14 OTTO, Herodes I, col. 76-77 and n. *. Otto adds still another possibility: the thirteenth year may refer to the completion of Sebaste in 25 BC (with work starting in 27 BC). CORBISHLEY, Chronology, p. 25, proposes that the thirteenth year for Sebaste’s foundation was reckoned from Herod’s nomination as king in 40 BC: 40 BC – 28/27 BC, but the hard- ships’ thirteenth year from Herod’s capture of Jerusalem in 37 BC: 37 BC – 25/24 BC. 15 Alexander and Aristobulus IV were sons of Herod by his second wife Mariamme I: SCHÜRER, History I, p. 321, 614. 16 Whiston translates «on the completion of the first Actiad». 17 Strabo, Geogr. VII 7.6; Suetonius, Aug. 18.2; Dio Cassius LI 1.2, 18.1. 1374-08_Anc_Soc38_08_Mahieu 30-10-2008 15:03 Pagina 186 186 B. MAHIEU 16, etc.) and (2) the counting of Actiads started with the first Actian Games. Thus, the first Actiad would correspond to the period September 28 BC – September 24 BC. The grant of territories took place after that four-year cycle: at the end of 24 BC or at the start of 23 BC18. Nevertheless, it seems that the first Actian Games were held in September 27 BC (four years after the Battle of Actium) rather than in 28 BC19. Moreover, the Actiads were probably reckoned from the Battle of Actium itself instead of from the first Actian Games, especially as no era starts at the first games, while there is the well-known Actian era of 31 BC20 (attested even in Josephus: A.J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Transformation of Roman Society Under Augustus
    THE TRANSFORMATION OF ROMAN SOCIETY UNDER AUGUSTUS Week 4 From Octavian to augustus From Octavian to Augustus I. Aftermath of Actium II. Settlement of 27 BC III. Settlement of 23 BC IV. Honours and prestige V. Man, god, primus inter pares? VI. ‘Restoring’ the Republic? Such was the naval battle in which they engaged on the second of September. I do not mention this date without a particular reason, nor am I, in fact, accustomed to do so; but Caesar now for the first time held all the power alone, and consequently the years of his reign are properly reckoned from that day. (Dio 51.1) What was Octavian’s position in the Roman world? How can we work this out? After actium -Octavian victor, unprecedented status -Not in Rome, but Egypt—needs to sort affairs there -Cornelius Gallus made prefect (d. 26 BC) After actium -Octavian victor, unprecedented status -Not in Rome, but Egypt—needs to sort affairs there -Cornelius Gallus made prefect (d. 26 BC) Caius Cornelius gallus -LACTOR P5: trilingual career inscription -Poetry: image of Octavian? (passage 1) Letter to Rhosus -Passage 2 How is Octavian cast by himself, and how is he treated by Rhosus? Honours of 29 BC Passage 3: -Arches -Actian games every 4 yrs -Auxilii latio -‘Athena’s vote’ Senate ratifies all his acts (Dio 51.20) Close doors of Janus temple Cistophorus of ephesus, 28 bc Libertatis P(opuli) Pax R(omani) Vindex Triple triumph of 29 BC - Dalmatia, Actium, Egypt From Octavian to Augustus I. Aftermath of Actium II. Settlement of 27 BC III.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Augustus
    The Failure of Augustus The Failure of Augustus: Essays on the Interpretation of a Paradox By E.A. Judge The Failure of Augustus: Essays on the Interpretation of a Paradox By E.A. Judge This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by E.A. Judge All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-2592-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-2592-4 For Tom Hillard nostro rerum Romanarum scrutatori peritissimo. Fig. 0-1: The Meroë head. Larger than life-size head in bronze from a statue of Augustus captured in 25 BC from Egypt and buried at Meroë in the Sudan. Now in the British Museum. Used with permission. CONTENTS Contents .................................................................................................... vii Tables & Figures ....................................................................................... ix Preface ....................................................................................................... xi Chapter One What Did Augustus Think He Should Be Doing? ...................................... 1 Chapter Two What Did they Think was Happening at the Time? ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Timeline Date China the World
    China and the world comparative timeline Date China The world 3000s 3630 BC People cultivate silk c.3200 BC Writing first used in BC worms to make silk fabric Mesopotamia c. 3200 BC Bronze work begins in Greece c.3000-1900 BC Indus Valley civilization in northern India 2000s 2000 BC Bronze working begins c.2600 BC First stone circle BC constructed at Stonehenge in England c.2570 BC Great pyramid of Giza built in Egypt 1000s 1650-1050 BC Shang dynasty c.1600 BC Earliest known glass BC developed in ancient Mesopotamia 1200 BC Writing first used (modern day Iraq) 1050-221 BC Zhou dynasty c.1500 BC First metal-working in Peru, South America 1336-1327 BC Reign of the pharaoh Tutankhamun in Egypt c.1300-900 BC Olmec civilization thrives in north Mexico 900s BC c.976-922 BC Reign of King Mu c. 943 -720 BC Egyptian 22nd Wang, fifth Zhou king, during dynasty rulers, orginally from Libya, whose reign the dynasty based at Tanis in north Egypt. reaches the peak of its power and territorial control. 934 -609 BC Neo-Assyrian Empire in Mesopotamia 800s BC 841 BC is taken by Chinese 813 BC City of Carthage in North historians as the first year of Africa is founded by the Phoenicians consecutive annual dating, based on the Records of the c.800 BC First writing in the Grand Historian by Sima Qian. Americas is produced by the Zapotec people of Mesoamerica. 700s BC 780 BC First historic solar 700s BC Coins start to be used in eclipse recorded in China.
    [Show full text]