DOCSLIB.ORG

Travis Air Force Base, California Groundwater Five-Year Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Travis Air Force Base, California Groundwater Five-Year Review Travis Air Force Base, California Groundwater Five-Year Review Executive Summary Travis Air Force Base (Travis AFB or Base), levels of contamination and potential risk, with public and regulatory acceptance, is and collect some of the data necessary for implementing interim groundwater the selection of final cleanup levels and tech- remedies at multiple contaminated sites. nically and economically feasible long-term This Groundwater Five-Year Review Report actions. The use of IRODs allowed actions to evaluates whether the interim remedies are proceed without having final designated protective of human health and the environ- cleanup levels, as will be required for the ment and are functioning as designed. Final Basewide Groundwater Record of Specifically, the five-year review provides Decision (ROD). The interim actions taken the following information: under the IRODs use interim remediation goals as performance objectives. These are · States whether the interim remedy is, or not legally enforceable standards, but are is expected to be, protective simply goals during the period of interim · Lists deficiencies identified during the long-term operation (LTO). review Travis AFB is the lead agency and responsible · Recommends specific actions to ensure party for the groundwater remediation actions that a remedy will be, or will continue to being evaluated in this first five-year review. The be, effective San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB), EPA, and This first Groundwater Five-Year Review Department of Toxic Substances Control Report is required by statute and is prepared (DTSC) provide regulatory agency oversight. in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Comprehensive Funding of groundwater remediation efforts Five-Year Review Guidance (EPA, 2001). is provided by the Department of Defense to The interim groundwater remedies are being the Air Mobility Command. The Air implemented in accordance with the Mobility Command then allocates these Groundwater Interim Record of Decision funds to Travis AFB according to priorities (IROD) for the North/ East/ West Industrial determined by the Air Force. Subsequently, Operable Unit (NEWIOU) (Travis AFB, 1997) the Air Force Center for Environmental and the Groundwater IROD for the Excellence (AFCEE) provides administration West/Annexes/ Basewide Operable Unit of these funds. The allocation of available (WABOU) (Travis AFB, 1999). funds is continually under review by the Air Force and is subject to alteration. Such The interim remedies were designed and funding changes are typically outside the constructed to quickly begin remediation of control of Travis AFB. Accordingly, the groundwater contamination, reduce the RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) VII GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY precise schedule of groundwater The primary groundwater contaminants remediation efforts is uncertain. Table ES-1 exceeding the interim remediation goals shows that optimization established by the NEWIOU and WABOU opportunities/further actions are identified IRODs include chlorinated volatile organic for some sites (located at the end of this compounds, primarily trichloroethylene and executive summary). A detailed schedule related compounds. Petroleum-fuel cannot be developed at this time, but Travis constituents, organochlorine pesticides, and AFB will consult with the SFBRWQCB, EPA, other contaminants are also present in some and DTSC to develop a schedule that is places. acceptable to all parties. Interim Remedial Action Objectives Background Groundwater interim remedial actions (IRA) have, as specified in the two IRODs, been Physical Setting designed and constructed to achieve the following basic interim remedial objectives: Travis AFB occupies approximately 6,000 acres and is located midway between · Source Control – hydraulically contain San Francisco and Sacramento, California. and remove contaminant mass from the Facilities include two major runways, groundwater and vadose zone using associated taxiways and aircraft parking groundwater extraction and treatment aprons, numerous hangars, buildings, shops, (GET) and vapor extraction and offices, freight handling and storage areas, treatment and maintenance facilities. Approximately · Migration Control – hydraulically 17,000 military and civilian personnel are contain contamination using a GET present daily on the Base. system and/or program of monitored Travis AFB is part of Air Mobility Command natural attenuation (MNA) and is host to the 60th Air Mobility Wing and · Offbase Remediation – hydraulically other units. The Air Mobility Wing operates contain and remediate plumes down to C-5 Galaxy cargo aircraft and KC-10 the contaminant-specific interim Extender refueling aircraft. The primary remediation goal using a GET system missions of Travis AFB, since its establish- ment in 1943, have been strategic recon- A summary of the IRA objectives for each naissance and airlift of freight and troops. IRP site is provided in Table ES-1. Groundwater Contamination Monitored Natural Attenuation As a result of past waste management and The Natural Attenuation Assessment Plan disposal practices, groundwater at Travis (NAAP) is the governing document for sites, AFB is contaminated at multiple locations. or portions or sites, undergoing assessments of MNA (CH2M HILL, 1998). The protocols The locations of groundwater contamination provided in the NAAP are the basis for and Installation Restoration Program (IRP) determining if the Migration Control sites are shown on Figure ES-1 and Plate 1. objective has been achieved and the VIII RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY contaminant plume has been stabilized through natural physical, chemical, and biological processes. In accordance with the IRODs and NAAP, multiple sites at Travis AFB are undergoing MNA assessment during the period of interim remedial action. These sites include: · LF006 – formally selected for MNA in the NEWIOU Groundwater IROD · FT004 – MNA assessment combined with GET · SD031 – MNA assessment combined with GET RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) IX GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES-1 Consolidated Groundwater Interim Remedial Actions 11 x 17 color X RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES-1 continued RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) XI GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY · LF007B – MNA assessment MNA assessments are underway in portions of plumes that are also undergoing GET. · LF007C – MNA assessment combined These plumes include FT004, SD031, with GET LF007C, SD033, SD037, and DP039. In · LF007D – MNA assessment these plumes, the higher concentration areas are undergoing GET for the purposes of · SS014 – petroleum fuels commingled Source Control and/or Migration Control with chlorinated hydrocarbons and the lower concentration areas (i.e., · SD033 – MNA assessment combined hydraulically downgradient of the GET with GET system) are under assessment to determine if MNA can provide effective Migration · SD037 – MNA assessment combined Control. However, until the GET component with GET of the interim remedy is completed and the · SS015 – MNA assessment deferred extraction wells turned off, the MNA pending enhanced biodegradation component cannot be fully evaluated treatability study because migration of the upgradient plume into the MNA assessment plume area may · DP039 – combined with GET, reactive result in increased contaminant wall treatability study, and concentrations. phytoremediation treatability study MNA appears successful at stabilizing the The listed sites initially underwent LF006, LF007B, and LF007D plumes. MNA, preliminary assessment of biodegradation in conjunction with GET, appears successful factors as part of the preparation of Natural at stabilizing the FT004 and SD031 plumes. Attenuation Assessment Work Plans. The At other MNA sizes, more data are needed plans established that, on an ongoing basis, before conclusions may be drawn. At one the MNA assessments would consist site, LF007C, MNA has not been successful. primarily of an assessment of plume Because contamination is migrating offbase stability. The Five Year Review, therefore, at this site, MNA has been replaced with focuses on plume stability as the main, but GET. not sole, criterion in assessing the success of MNA. Site Consolidation In the list above, LF006 and DP039 are the Travis AFB has constructed multiple only sites at which MNA was selected as the groundwater IRAs to achieve the Source interim remedy. For the remainder of the Control, Migration Control, and Offbase sites, a Natural Attenuation Summary Remediation interim objectives. Both IRODs Report will be prepared in the future, that prescribe site-specific groundwater IRAs for will make recommendations whether MNA the applicable IRP sites. Historically, these should be selected as a final remedy at the IRAs have been described in terms of the sites. The Natural Attenuation Summary actions taken at the individual sites and, in Report will be prepared in accordance with some cases, at collections of sites. However, the NAAP. since issuance of the LTO Strategic Plan, a more appropriate strategy has been XII RDD/030910018 (CAH2328.DOC) GROUNDWATER FIVE-YEAR REVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY employed by consolidating site-specific IRAs for future Risk-based Corrective IRAs with common key components into Actions (RBCA) in accordance with the regional IRAs (CH2M HILL, 2001). The POCO Sites Work Plan (IT Corporation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 4.8.1
    4.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Human-caused hazards that may potentially have an effect on the Specific Plan Area include hazardous and toxic materials (including facilities regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], hazardous waste and disposal, toxic releases, leaking underground storage tanks [LUSTs], and utility pipelines), military installations, other airports and airport hazards, and potential adverse human health effects from exposure to electric and magnetic fields (EMFs). The following section describes the existing conditions of these hazards in and within the vicinity of the Specific Plan Area. This section analyzes the significance of potential impacts related to hazards associated with historic and current land uses of the Specific Plan Area and surrounding uses, as well as potential impacts related to hazardous materials that may be introduced by the Specific Plan. 4.8.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section describes the hazards and hazardous materials, including “Recognized Environmental Conditions” (REC) that are located within the Specific Plan Area. As defined in the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E 1527-05, a REC is “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a part release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property.” The information on RECs is based on Hazardous Materials Assessment Report Northeast Fairfield Station Area, Fairfield, CA prepared by ENGEO, Inc. (included as Appendix G to this EIR).
    [Show full text]
  • THE MOBILITY FORUM Spring 2018 AIR MOBILITY COMMAND Gen Carlton Everhart II
    THE MOBILITYTHE MAGAZINE OF AIR MOBILITY COMMAND | SPRING 2018 FORUM 2017 SAFETY AWA R D W I N N E R S AMC Command Chief Shelina Frey Shares Thoughts on Full Spectrum Readiness Volume 27, No. 1 CONTENTS THE MOBILITY FORUM Spring 2018 AIR MOBILITY COMMAND Gen Carlton Everhart II DIRECTOR OF SAFETY Col Brandon R. Hileman [email protected] EDITORS Kim Knight 5 14 28 34 [email protected] Sherrie Schatz Sheree Lewis FROM THE TOP AMC NEWS [email protected] 3 AMC Command Chief Shelina 26 Bronze Star Recipient Reflects on GRAPHIC DESIGN Frey Shares Thoughts on Full Dirt Strip Operations in Syria Elizabeth Bailey Spectrum Readiness 34 Feeding the Hungry with The Mobility Forum (TMF) is published Humanitarian Aid four times a year by the Director of RISK MANAGEMENT Safety, Air Mobility Command, Scott AMC OPS AFB, IL. The contents are informative and 5 Brig Gen Lamberth Expounds not regulatory or directive. Viewpoints on Embracing the Red: An 28 The Strategic Airlift Capability in expressed are those of the authors and do Update on Air Force Inspection Pápa, Hungary: A Dozen Nations, not necessarily reflect the policy of AMC, System Implementation a Single Mission USAF, or any DoD agency. 10 The Five Levels of Military Flight Contributions: Please email articles and Operations Quality Assurance photos to [email protected], MOTORCYCLE CULTURE fax to (580) 628-2011, or mail to Schatz Analysis Acceptance 30 A Short Ride with a Lifelong Lesson Publishing, 11950 W. Highland Ave., 36 AMC’s Aerial Port LOSA Proof Blackwell, OK 74631.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Unit Readiness: Case Study of an Air Force Mobility Wing
    DOCUMENTED BRIEFING R Assessing Unit Readiness Case Study of an Air Force Mobility Wing David E. Thaler, Carl J. Dahlman Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. ISBN: 0-8330-3208-9 The RAND documented briefing series is a mechanism for timely, easy-to-read reporting of research that has been briefed to the client and possibly to other audiences. Although documented briefings have been formally reviewed, they are not expected to be comprehensive or definitive. In many cases, they represent interim work. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2002 by RAND 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 102, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE In the second half of the 1990s, the United States Air Force began to report a decline in the readiness levels of its combat support forces.
    [Show full text]
  • HABS No. CA-2669-B Travis Air Force Base, B-36 Hangar (Travis Air
    HABS No. CA-2669-B Travis Air Force Base, B-36 Hangar (Travis Air Force Base, Building No. 810) H Between Woodskill Avenue and Ellis, adjacent to Taxiway V and W Fairfield Solano County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DA TA Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94107 HAB5 C...AL HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY "I~- t=A 112 Travis Air Force Base B-36Hangar ~G- / Building No. 810 HABS No. CA-2669-B Location: Building 810 is between Woodskill Avenue and Ellis, adjacent to Taxiway "V" and "W." U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle, Elmira, California (1980), Universal Transverse Coordinates: 4235340.591897. Significance: Building 810 is significant as an excellent example of a double-cantilever, medium bomber hangar used for maintenance of the B-36. It was one of the first such double-bay bomber hangars erected nationwide by the Strategic Air Command (SAC). The B-36 was SAC's first long-range, intercontinental bomber carrying nuclear weapons, the only aircraft during the early years of the Cold War capable of reaching-and returning from­ the Soviet Union. This maintenance hangar, in response to the size of the bomber, was monumental. Similar structures were built at SAC installations between 1952 and 1957. The double-cantilever, B-36 hangar was one of the first symbolic military structures of the Cold War; its physical size foreshadowed the moleholes and alert apron of the B-52 and KC-135 tanker (Geo-Marine, 1996). Description: This building is an oversized, steel frame, and open-truss hangar, with a flat roof, reinforced, concrete slab foundation and metal-deck roof.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000.
    [Show full text]
  • 18Th Air Force Leadership … … Into Travis
    CHECKLIST Folios OK NO Headlines OK NO Cutlines OK NO NA Mugs OK NO NA Graphics OK NO NA Stories end OK NO Jumplines OK NO NA Ads OK NO NA NO=Not OK; NA=Not applicable Reprint Y N Initials 18th Air Force leadership … PAGESBUMPS 10-11 … into Travis AFB TAILWIND Tailwind | Travis AFB, Calif. z Friday, February 12, 2021 | Vol. 46, Number 6 z Travis C-17 aids Germany, Guatemala PAGE 2 Sergeant shares info from course, family PAGE 3 CHECKLIST CHECKLIST Folios OK NO Folios OK NO Headlines OK NO Headlines OK NO Cutlines OK NO NA Cutlines OK NO NA Mugs OK NO NA Mugs OK NO NA Graphics OK NO NA Graphics OK NO NA Stories end OK NO Stories end OK NO Jumplines OK NO NA Jumplines OK NO NA Ads OK NO NA Ads OK NO NA NO=Not OK; NA=Not applicable NO=Not OK; NA=Not applicable Reprint Y N Reprint Y N Initials Initials FEBRUARY 12, 2021 TRAVIS TAILWIND 3 4 TAILWIND ARMED FORCES FEBRUARY 12, 2021 Sergeant adds to family’s flying lore at course Down day Nick DeCicco to target 60TH AIR MOBILITY WING PUBLIC AFFAIRS DOD mandates mask usage Aviation history runs in the blood of Department of Defense News Staff Sgt. Cade Yandell. extremism The sergeant at Travis Air Force Secretary of Defense Base, California, is the descendent of sev- Lloyd J. Austin III signed David Vergun eral generations of flyers; his father, who a memo Feb. 4 that, effec- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NEWS received his pilot’s license at 15, an un- tive immediately, directs all cle who flew commercially and a grandfa- individuals on military in- On Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Travis Air Force Base : California
    Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE : CALIFORNIA Travis Air Force Base (AFB) is located in the San Francisco Bay area, in Fairfield, California, approximately halfway between Sacramento and San Francisco. Its host unit is the 60th Air Mobility Wing, which is the largest air mobility organization in the U.S. Air Force. In addition, it is home to the 349th Air Above: Travis AFB gate sign prominently Mobility Wing, which displays the 60th Air Mobility Wing’s is the largest air motto – “America’s First Choice.” reserve wing in the Left: September 11, 2013 Travis AFB U.S. Air Force, and executed a mass aircraft launch exercise. The launch of eleven KC-10A the West Coast Extenders, seven C-17 Globemaster IIIs, branch of the 621st and four C-5 Galaxies provided essential training across the spectrum of mobility Contingency capabilities, including flight operations, operations support, aircraft Response Wing, maintenance, fuels and air traffic control. Travis AFB is the only U.S. Air which is America’s 9-1-1 force. As such, Travis AFB handles more Force base to house all of these cargo and passengers than any other military air terminal in the aircrafts. (U.S. Air Force photo) United States. As the largest employer in Solano County, Travis AFB 60th AMW MISSION STATEMENT contributed over $1.6 billion to the local economy in 2013. Part of the Air Mobility Command, the 60th Air Mobility Wing is responsible for strategic airlift and air refueling missions FAST FACTS circling the globe. The unit's primary roles are to provide rapid, reliable airlift » Location: Solano County, CA (near Fairfield) of American fighting forces anywhere on earth in support of national objectives » Land Area: 6,791 acres and to extend the reach of American and allied air power through mid-air » Special Use Airspace: 322 square nautical miles refueling.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowthe6thairrefuelingwing-Page 2
    Vol. 47, No. 40 Thursday, October 3, 2019 News/Features: page 3 Lessons in resiliency News/Features: page 3 MG’19 testing Airmen Week in photos: page 4 Images from the week News/Features: page 6 MG ‘19 forging relationships Now the 6th Air Refueling Wing- page 2 Photo by Airman 1st Class Ryan C. Grossklag U.S. Air Force Col. Stephen Snelson, the 6th Air Refueling Wing (ARW) commander, speaks at the 6th ARW redesignation Community: page 15 ceremony at MacDill Air Force Base Sept. 30. As of Oct. 1, MacDill’s host wing will transition from the 6th Air Mobility Wing Events, Chapel, more... to the 6th ARW, maintaining its dedication to delivering unmatched air refueling. NEWS/FEATURES 6th Air Refueling Wing redesignation by Airman 1st Class Ryan C. Grossklag 6th Air Refueling Wing Team MacDill held a redesignation ceremony commencing the transition of the 6th Air Mobility Wing to the 6th Air Refueling Wing Monday. The new designation became official Tuesday. The event, held at the community park, marks the host wing’s first redesignation since the 6th AMW moved to MacDill Air Force Base from Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska in 1993. The change comes with the departure of MacDill’s C-37A Gulfstream jets and the deactivation of the historic 310th Airlift Squadron. “With the deactivation of the 310th, our wing’s sole air operations mis- sion is once again, air refueling,” said Col. Stephen Snelson, the 6th ARW commander, speaking to the attending crowd. “Our name may be new, but our mission is still delivering unmatched air refueling, and installation and mission support.” Snelson spoke of the history of MacDill and the wings that have come and gone over the years, but assured the crowd that the presiding focus remained the same.
    [Show full text]
  • State Miitary Hospital/Clinic CLR Secure Fax Number DMIS 3 Alaska 354Th Medical Group-Eielson Air Force Base Alaska 3349 Central Ave
    A B C D 1 2 State Miitary Hospital/Clinic CLR Secure Fax Number DMIS 3 Alaska 354th Medical Group-Eielson Air Force Base Alaska 3349 Central Ave. (907) 377-1969 4 Eielson AFB, AK 99702 0203 673rd Medical Group-Joint Base Elmendorf/Richardson 5955 Zeamer Ave. (907) 580-0000 Anchorage, AK 99506 5 0006 AF-C-673rd FLT MED-ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON 8497 Rickenbacker Ave. (907) 580-0000 6 Anchorage, AK 99506 1340 Bassett Army Community Hospital-Fort Wainwright 1060 Gaffney Rd., #7400 (907) 361-5305 7 Ft. Wainwright, AK 99703 0005 TMC Fort Richardson Bldg. 604, 600 Richardson Dr. (907) 384-3170 8 Ft. Richardson, AK 99505 0204 U.S. Coast Guard Clinic-Juneau 709 W. 9th St., Ste 627 (907) 463-2150 9 Juneau, AK 99801 7044 10 Arizona Branch Medical Clinic-MCAS Yuma Arizona Bldg. 1175, PO Box 99116 (760) 725-1506 11 Yuma, AZ 85369 0269 355th Medical Group-Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 4175 S Alamo Ave (520) 228-0031 12 Davis-Monthan, AZ 85707 0010 AF-C-355th Mental Health-DM-4339 5427 E. Madera St. (520) 228-0031 13 Tucson, AZ 85707 1334 AF-C-355th Health CTR-DM-420 4175 S. Alamo Ave. (520) 228-0031 14 Tucson, AZ 85707 1339 Raymond W. Bliss Army Health Center-Fort Huachuca 2240 E Winrow Ave. (630) 570-6346 15 Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613 0008 56th Medical Group-Luke Air Force Base 7219 N Litchfield Rd. (623) 856-4157 16 Luke AFB, AZ 85309 0009 Army Health Clinic-Yuma Proving Ground 301 "C" Street, Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Lt Col Akeredolu Bio 2018 Pdf.Pdf
    BIOGRAPHY U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT COLONEL DANIEL O. AKEREDOLU I R F O R C Lieutenant Colonel Daniel O. Akeredolu is the Commander, Air Force ROTC Detachment 820/Department Head, Aerospace Studies, Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas. He is responsible for recruiting, educating, inspiring, then sourcing the United States Air Force with its next generation of high caliber leaders. Lieutenant Colonel Akeredolu received his commission from Officers Training School in 2000. He has held assignments at the Wing, Numbered Air Force, Direct Reporting Unit, and Air Staff levels. Most recently he was Commander, 14 Force Support Squadron, Columbus Air Force Base Mississippi. His expeditionary assignments include: Qatar, The United Arab Emirates, and Kyrgyzstan all in support of Operations IRAQI and ENDURING FREEDOM. EDUCATION 1999 Bachelor of Science degree in Management/Human Resources, Park University, Parkville, Missouri 2006 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 2009 Master of Science, Public Administration, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan 2011 Air Command and Staff College, by correspondence 2014 Joint & Combined Warfighting School, Joint Forces Staff College, National Defense University, Norfolk, VA ASSIGNMENTS 1. November 2000 – November 2002, Food Services Officer, 347 Services Squadron, Moody Air Force Base, GA 2. November 2002 – May 2005, Flightline Protocol Officer, 89th Airlift Wing, Andrews Air Force Base, MD 3. May 2005 – May 2007, Protocol Officer, Headquarters US Air Force, Pentagon, Washington D.C. 4. May 2007 – May 2008, Chief of Protocol, Headquarters 7th Air Force, Osan Air Base, Republic of Korea 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Doolittle Raider Laid to Rest - Page 3
    Vol. 47, No. 17 Thursday,April 25, 2019 Commentary: page 2 Innovation recognized News/Features: page 3 DoD takes on sexual assault Week in photos: page 4 Images from the week News/Features: page 8 KC-135 fills KC-46A Last Doolittle Raider laid to rest - page 3 Photo by Tristin English Attendees bow their heads during the invocation at a memorial service for retired Lt. Col. Richard “Dick” E. Cole at Joint Base San Antonio-Randolph, Texas, April 18. Cole, the last surviving Doolittle Raider, was the copilot on a B-25 Mitchell Community: page 15 for then-Col. Jimmy Doolittle during the storied World War II Doolittle Tokyo Raid and was a founding Airman of the USAF Events, Chapel, more... Special Operations community. MACDILL THUNDERBOLT u Thursday, April 25, 2019 u WWW.MACDILLTHUNDERBOLT.COM u 1 COMMENTARY AMC commander: unleash Airman innovation by Gen. Maryanne Miller Air Mobility Command I have had the privilege of working for the men and women of Air Mo- bility Command for 7 months now. I quickly came to appreciate the in- credible capacity of this exceptionally talented force – the force necessary to ensure we continue achieving mobility objectives in any environment. Before I took command of AMC, I reflected on the heritage of the many incredible mobility leaders who came before me. I researched their focus areas, their visions, and their many accomplishments.The foundation of their legacy was built on readiness, mission emphasis, moderniza- tion and, most importantly, taking care of people.These priorities make up the core of what we do in AMC, and I’m honored to lead our mobility enterprise – enabling a ready, capable, lethal force – now and into the future.
    [Show full text]