DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Proposed Plan Tonto National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Proposed Plan Tonto National Forest United States Department of Agriculture Tonto National Forest’s Preliminary Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan Tonto National Forest Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai Counties Arizona Forest Service Tonto National Forest November 2017 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Note: We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer-assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with this document, please contact the Tonto National Forest at (602) 225-5200. Cover Photo: View of Mogollon Rim near Payson, AZ - ponderosa pine evergreen oak system Tonto National Forest – Preliminary Proposed Plan – November 2017 Table of Contents Chapter 1. Forest Plan Purpose and Framework ........................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Preliminary Proposed Plan ................................................................................................ 1 Forest Plan Content ................................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Components .................................................................................................................................. 2 Other Required Plan Content ................................................................................................................ 2 Optional Plan Content ........................................................................................................................... 3 Forest Plan Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 Project Consistency with Plan Components ............................................................................................. 4 Determining consistency ....................................................................................................................... 4 Forest Plan Implementation ...................................................................................................................... 5 Plan Area ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Forest-Wide Plan Direction ......................................................................................................... 6 Partnerships and Volunteers...................................................................................................................... 6 Description ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Desired Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 6 Management Approaches ...................................................................................................................... 6 Vegetation – Ecological Response Units (ERUs) ..................................................................................... 7 Description ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Desired conditions for All Terrestrial Ecosystems/ERUs ..................................................................... 8 Standards for Terrestrial Ecosystems/ERUs ......................................................................................... 9 Objectives for Terrestrial Ecosystems/ERUs ........................................................................................ 9 Guidelines for All Terrestrial ERUs ..................................................................................................... 9 Management Approaches .................................................................................................................... 10 Desert Ecosystems .............................................................................................................................. 10 General Description ........................................................................................................................ 10 Landscape Scale Desired Conditions .............................................................................................. 11 Midscale Desired Conditions .......................................................................................................... 12 Guidelines ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Management approaches ................................................................................................................. 13 Semi-Desert Grasslands ...................................................................................................................... 13 1 General Description ........................................................................................................................ 13 Landscape Scale Desired Conditions .............................................................................................. 13 Midscale Desired Conditions .......................................................................................................... 15 Guidelines ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Management Approaches ................................................................................................................ 15 Interior Chaparral ................................................................................................................................ 16 General Description ........................................................................................................................ 16 Landscape Scale Desired Conditions .............................................................................................. 17 Midscale Desired Conditions .......................................................................................................... 18 Fine Scale Desired Conditions ........................................................................................................ 18 Guidelines ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Pinyon-Juniper Woodland .................................................................................................................. 18 General Description ........................................................................................................................ 18 Landscape Scale Desired Conditions .............................................................................................. 19 Midscale Desired Conditions .......................................................................................................... 20 Guidelines ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Pinyon-Juniper Grass and Juniper Grass ............................................................................................ 20 General Description ........................................................................................................................ 20 Landscape Scale Desired Conditions .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest
    FRONTIERS IN GEOLOGY AND ORE DEPOSITS OF ARIZONA AND THE SOUTHWEST Arizona Geological Society and the University of Arizona 1986 Symposium FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK u Proterozoic Geology of the Sierra Ancha-Tonto Basin­ Mazatzal Mountains Area. Central Arizona March 17-19, 1986 Leaders: C. Conway and C. Wrucke (U.S.G.S.) Coordinators: P. Swift ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY TUCSON, ARIZONA Cover preparation by Beverly Morgan, modified from J. Mehulka and P. Mirocha, AGS Digest Volume XVI ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY P.O. BOX 40952, UNIVERSITY STATION TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 To: Field Trip Participants Welcome to Arizona and the 1986 Arizona Geological Society Symposium "Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest. 11 As field trip chairman I would like to wish you an enjoyable and informative con­ ference and a worthwhile field trip experience. The field trip committee set out many months ago to provide field expo­ sure to a broad spectrum of geological disciplines. The results include trips to recent precious-metal discoveries, areas of new and developing stratigraph­ ic and structure concepts, industrial mineral resources, lithologic features significant to the petroleum potential in the Southwest, geologic hazards in the community, and an opportunity to attend trips from previous Arizona Geo­ logical Society meetings. We hope you find your chosen field trip as exciting as we intended. At this time of very limited support from industry, it is especially im­ portant to acknowledge the personal efforts of so many. I include in those the planning and follow through of the field trip committee, the many hours of preparation by the trip leaders, and the commitment of the trip coordina­ tors to a smooth-running trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Data 3-16-2019.Xlsx
    Hiking Club Database 3/16/2019 Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Location Hike Description A Agua Caliente Hill Rincons The hike has great panoramic views of Tucson, and the Rincon and Santa Catalinas. The trail starts climbing immediately from the Camino Remuda Trailhead. The trail continues up and down for approximately two miles to a water hole. From here, the trail climbs and then drops into a wash. Next is a steep climb to a ridge and a junction with old jeep FS # 4445, about three miles from the trailhead. It is another 1.5 miles to the top of Aqua Caliente Hill. The return is via the same route. Hike 8.5 miles; trailhead elevation 2930 feet; net elevation change 2430 feet; accumulated gain 3045 feet; RTD 75 miles. A Agua Caliente Hill / La Milagrosa Ridge / Rincons In this key exchange hike, one group will start at the Camino Remuda Trailhead, climb Molino Basin to the saddle, and summit Agua Caliente Hill. The group will then descend to the saddle, merge with a trail going north to Agua Caliente Canyon, connect with La Milagrosa Trail, hike northeast to the intersection with the AZT, then head northwest toward Molino Basin on Catalina Hwy. The other group will do the reverse. Hike 14.2 miles; trailhead elevations Camino Remuda/Molino Basin 2930/4480 feet; net elevation change 2430 feet, accumulated gain: hill to basin 4720 feet, basin to hill 3300 feet; RTD 97 miles. A Agua Caliente Hill and La Milagrosa Rincons The hike begins at the Camino Remuda Trailhead and follows the Agua Caliente Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 04-03 September, 2004
    COMPILATION GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE RENO PASS AREA, CENTRAL MAZATZAL MOUNTAINS, MARICOPA AND GILA COUNTIES, ARIZONA Jon. E. Spencer1, Robert S. Leighty1, Clay M. Conway2, Charles A. Ferguson1, and Stephen M. Richard1 Arizona Geological Survey, Open File Report 04-03 September, 2004 Scale 1:24,000, with 18 p. text 1Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85701 2Gæaorama, Inc., 366 S. 300 E. (97-12), Blanding, UT 84511 Compilation geologic map of the Reno Pass area, central Mazatzal Mountains, Maricopa and Gila Counties, central Arizona Introduction The 1:24,000 scale geologic map that is the basis for this report covers part of the central Mazatzal Mountains in the area where the Beeline Highway (State Highway 87) crosses the range (Figure 1). The map area includes all of the Reno Pass 7 ½' Quadrangle, the eastern third of the Lion Mountain 7 ½' Quadrangle, and the western third of the Kayler Butte 7 ½' Quadrangle. Parts of this area have been mapped and studied by several investigators (Figure 2), whereas other areas remain unmapped, in part because Arizona interior chaparral is difficult to pass through and may require crawling under and climbing over for large distances. This map is an attempt to compile and synthesize maps and unit descriptions from these diverse studies. A stratigraphic correlation diagram is included as figure 3. Regional Setting The Mazatzal Mountains are part of the Transition Zone physiographic province in Arizona. The Transition Zone separates the Colorado Plateau, a region of gently dipping Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata that overlie Proterozoic bedrock, from the Basin and Range Province, which consists of numerous, structurally complex mountain ranges partially or completely surrounded by late Cenozoic, basin-filling sediments and sedimentary rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pictures of Some Local Arizona Hikes – Elly
    Pictures of some local Arizona hikes – Elly Since moving to Arizona in 1995, I have been hiking the Grand Canyon, Havasupai Canyon and other wonders but the Superstitions, Goldfields, and other lesser known areas are awsome too. Below are some pictures of these local hikes, mainly from after digital cameras became mainstream. I have organized them by region. Superstition Mountain Wilderness The Superstitions are a range of mountains in the East Valley which, together with areas to its North and East were made into a wilderness area in 1939. It is the area of a number of battles and of goldmining. The `Dutchman’ Jacob Waltz is said to have found a fortune in gold and many trail names remind us of the history: Jacob’s Crosscut, The Dutchman’s Trail, and Massacre Grounds. One can get to the top of the Superstition in a number of ways, of which I have only used the Siphon Draw access. Jacob’s Crosscut Trail is a very close, safe, and convenient hike along the base of the Superstition Mountain. It is part of the Lost Dutchman State Park. Look well: a horned lizard! 1 Whiskey Spring loop. I started this loop as an `end-of-semester’ trek for ASU students in the 1990s but it became too long for many. The hike starts at the Peralta Dutchman Trail and goes around Miner’s Needle to come back via Bluff Springs trail. The below are from 2010. The Carney Springs Trail starts off the road to the Peralta Trailhead and then ascends the mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Geochronology of the Proterozoic Mazatzal Group, Central Arizona
    Sedimentology, stratigraphy, and geochronology of the Proterozoic Mazatzal Group, central Arizona RoÂnadh Cox² Department of Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA Mark W. Martin³ Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA Jana C. Comstock Department of Geosciences, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA Laura S. Dickerson Geology Department, Colorado College, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, USA Ingrid L. Ekstrom Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, USA James H. Sammons Department of Geology, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia 24450, USA ABSTRACT Group. When tectonic activity ceased, how- the Proterozoic tectonic block known as the ever, the surrounding highlands were planed Mazatzal block (Karlstrom and Bowring, Quartzite, conglomerate, and shale of the down by erosion, and detritus from a wider 1993) (Fig. 2) and represents the transition Mazatzal Group record the ®lling of a Prot- variety of source rocks was funneled into the from tectonically active arc and marginal- erozoic intra-arc basin in central Arizona. U- basin. This included contributions from arc- basin environments to a stable continental re- Pb ages of zircons from rhyolite ash-¯ow tuff related supracrustal rocks of the Payson gime (Bowring and Karlstrom, 1990; Karls- indicate that deposition began at 1701 6 2 Ophiolite and East Verde River Formation, trom and Bowring, 1988; Karlstrom et al., Ma. Basal deposits of the newly de®ned Pine and ®nally a granitic basement input. Detri- 1987). Information about the age and stratig- Creek Conglomerate formed in an alluvial- tal quartz in the lower part of the Mazatzal raphy of these sedimentary deposits is there- fan setting, synchronous with the ®nal Group is largely monocrystalline, and vol- fore fundamental to understanding the later phase of extrusive rhyolite volcanism and canic in origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Euro-American History
    Arizona History AZT Passage 23-Mazatzal Divide by Preston Sands The 23rd passage of the Arizona Trail follows the Mazatzal Divide Trail along the crest of the rugged Mazatzal Mountains, past a number of connecting trails used by ranchers in years past, who left their mark upon this area in the form of old line cabins and colorful place names. As a wild, rugged and largely inaccessible area, the northern Mazatzal Mountains were an ideal location for moonshiners during Prohibition, who produced what was known locally as “Payson Dew.” The Mazatzal Wilderness is one of Arizona’s oldest and largest wilderness areas. Designated in 1938 as the Mazatzal Primitive Area, this wild expanse became the Mazatzal Wilderness two years later. In 1984, the Wilderness was expanded to its present size. Traveling northbound, the first major canyon this section traverses is Deer Creek. David Gowan, a Scottish immigrant, miner, and rancher, chose to make his home late in life within this deep incision through the heart of the Mazatzals. Gowan, the modern-day, non-native “discoverer” of Tonto Natural Bridge near Payson, moved into the upper reaches of Deer Creek sometime around 1916. Living in a crude log cabin among the fruit trees and vegetable garden he had constructed, Gowan supported himself by working a couple of mining claims nearby, and selling the ore he obtained. After a decade in the mountains, Gowan passed away in 1926, and was buried where he was found, in the lower reaches of Deer Creek, where his grave can still be seen. “Gowan Camp,” as it was known, became known as “Windsor Camp” soon after.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim
    Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Shí Kéyaa: The Western Apache Homeland and Archaeology of the Mogollon Rim Angie Krall Vincent E. Randall Technical Report No. 2007-03 Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85716 • July 2009 PREFACE The realignment of State Route 260 (SR 260) be- Cores and frontiers depend on vantage point, tween Payson and Heber follows a long tradition however. In this report, KenCairn and Randall ad- of trail blazing through the lands below the Mogol- dress the presumption of the interpretation that lon Rim region. For over 3,000 years, people have described the region as frontier. They examine the passed through the region, perhaps following the region as a homeland and an essential and central route of the modern highway through spring-fed part of the history and identity of Apache, even as meadows and perennial streams. For at least 350 private and public entities have claimed the lands years, the stewards of this land have often been of the Mogollon Rim and native peoples have been Apache and Yavapai. moved to reservations. For modern Apache, the area is a “bridge” be- An extensive view of the Apache use of the tween the modern Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto, sub-Mogollon Rim was drawn from published and White Mountain, and San Carlos Reservations. unpublished ethnographic work on Apache places, Tribal members recall trails traveled by foot, don- cultural resource management reports, and the key, horse, or car, as well as camps made under the records of the public agencies who protect and trees, ramadas, or wickiups.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Trees
    I SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona Agriculture Handbook No. 9 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona By ELBERT L. LITTLE, JR., Forester (Dendrology) FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 9 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE DECEMBER 1950 Reviewed and approved for reprinting August 1968 For sale by the Superintendent oí Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - CONTENTS Page Page Introduction . 1 Spurge family (Euphorbiaceae) . 76 Vegetation of New Mexico and Cashew family (Anacardiaceae) . 78 Arizona 4 Bittersweet family (Celastraceae) 79 Forests of New Mexico and Arizona 9 Maple family (Aceraceae) .... 80 How to use this handbook 10 Soapberry family (Sapindaceae) . 82 Pine family (Pinaceae) .-..,.. 10 Buckthorn family (Rhamnaceae) . 83 Palm family (Palmae) 24 Sterculla family (Sterculiaceae) . 86 Lily family (Liliaceae) 26 Tamarisk family (Tamaricaceae) . 86 Willow family (Salicaceae) .... 31 Allthorn family (Koeberliniaceae) 88 Walnut family (Juglandaceae) . 42 Cactus family (Cactaceae) .... 88 Birch family (Betulaceae) .... 44 Dogwood family (Cornaceae) . , 95 Beech family (Fagaceae) .... 46 Heath family (Ericaceae) .... 96 Elm family (Ulmaceae) 53 Sapote family (Sapotaceae) ... 97 Mulberry family (Moraceae) ... 54 Olive family (Oleaceae) 98 Sycamore family (Platanaceae) . 54 Nightshade family (Solanaceae) . 101 Rose family (Rosaceae) 55 Bignonia family (Bignoniaceae) . 102 Legume family (Leguminosae) . 63 Honeysuckle family (Caprifo- liaceae) 103 Rue family (Rutaceae) 73 Selected references 104 Ailanthus family (Simaroubaceae) 74 Index of common and scientific Bur sera family (Burseraceae) . 75 names 106 11 SOUTHWESTERN TREES A Guide to the Native Species of New Mexico and Arizona INTRODUCTION The Southwest, where the low, hot, barren Mexican deserts meet the lofty, cool, forested Rocky Mountains in New Mexico and Ari- zona, has an unsuspected richness of native trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona by Robert S. Leighty and 1Stephen D. Holloway Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-21 November, 1998 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 25-page text and 1:24,000 scale geologic map. I Department o/Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1404 This report was supported by the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, with funds provided by the Us. Environmental Protection Agency through the State Indoor Radon Grant Program, the us. Geological Survey via the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs, Arizona State University, and the Arizona Geological Survey. This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The New River SE 7.S-minute Quadrangle is located in the northern fringe of the Phoenix metropolitan area and is bordered by Biscuit Flat to the west, the Union Hills to the south, Paradise Valley to the southeast, and the New River and New River Mesa areas to the north (Figure 1). The quadrangle is bounded by latitudes 33°4S'00"N and 33°S2'30''N, and longitudes 112°00'00"W and 112°07'30"W. Given its location, the area has become highly urbanized during the last few decades and is still undergoing rapid population growth. Thus, the knowledge of the distribution and character of bedrock and surficial deposits is important to make informed decisions concerning management of the land and its resources. Geologic mapping of the New River SE Quadrangle is related to other 1:24,000 scale mapping projects of the Arizona Geological Survey in and around the Phoenix metropolitan area (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution of the Mcdowell Mountains Maricopa County
    Structural Evolution of the McDowell Mountains Maricopa County, Arizona by Brad Vance A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved November 2012 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Stephen Reynolds, Chair Steven Semken Edmund Stump ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2012 ABSTRACT The accretion of juvenile island-arc lithosphere by convergent tectonism during the Paleoproterozoic, in conjunction with felsic volcanism, resulted in the assembly, ductile to partial brittle deformation, uplift, and northwest-directed thrusting of rocks in the McDowell Mountains region and adjacent areas in the Mazatzal Orogenic belt. Utilizing lithologic characteristics and petrographic analysis of the Proterozoic bedrock, a correlation to the Alder series was established, revising the stratigraphic sequences described by earlier works. The central fold belt, composed of an open, asymmetric syncline and an overturned, isoclinal anticline, is cut by an axial-plane parallel reactivated thrust zone that is intruded by a deformed Paleoproterozoic mafic dike. Finite strain analyses of fold geometries, shear fabrics, foliations, fold vergence, and strained clasts point to Paleoproterozoic northwest-directed thrusting associated with the Mazatzal orogen at approximately 1650 million years ago. Previous studies constrained the regional P-T conditions to at least the upper andalusite-kyanite boundary at peak metamorphic conditions, which ranged from 4-6 kilobars and 350-450⁰ Celsius, although the plasticity of deformation in a large anticlinal core suggests that this represents the low end of the P-T conditions. Subsequent to deformation, the rocks were intruded by several granitoid plutons, likely of Mesoproterozoic age (1300-1400 Ma). A detailed analysis of Proterozoic strain solidly places the structure of the McDowell Mountains within the confines of the Mazatzal Orogeny, pending any contradictory geochronological data.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineralization Associated with the Early Proterozoic Alder Group, the Sunflower Mining District, Maricopa and Gila Counties, Arizona
    Geology and mineralization associated with the early proterozoic alder group, the Sunflower Mining District, Maricopa and Gila Counties, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Orr, Richard Leigh, 1959- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 16:40:54 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/558128 > GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE EARLY PROTEROZOIC ALDER GROUP, THE SUNFLOWER MINING DISTRICT, MARICOPA AND GILA COUNTIES, ARIZONA. by Richard Leigh Orr A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTERS OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 9 0 3 UJ CL U 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under the rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgement the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]