Herbarium Scientific Name Minnesota DNR Common Name Status

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herbarium Scientific Name Minnesota DNR Common Name Status Oronoco Prairie SNA Plant List Herbarium Scientific Name Minnesota DNR Common Name Status Amorpha canescens leadplant Andropogon gerardii big bluestem Anemone cylindrica long-headed thimbleweed Arnoglossum plantagineum tuberous Indian plantain T Asclepias tuberosa butterflyweed Baptisia lactea white wild indigo SC Botrychium campestre prairie moonwort SC Bouteloua curtipendula side-oats grama Brickellia eupatorioides var. corymbulosa false boneset Bromus inermis smooth brome Bromus kalmii Kalm's brome Campanula rotundifolia harebell Carex meadii Mead's sedge Carex richardsonii Richardson's sedge Carex tetanica rigid sedge Carex umbellata umbel sedge Comandra umbellata subsp. umbellata bastard toadflax Coreopsis palmata bird's foot coreopsis Cornus racemosa gray dogwood Cosmos sulphureus sulphur cosmos Dalea purpurea purple prairie clover Dichanthelium leibergii Leiberg's panic grass Erigeron strigosus daisy fleabane Eryngium yuccifolium rattlesnake master SC Euphorbia corollata flowering spurge Galium triflorum sweet-scented bedstraw Helianthus pauciflorus stiff sunflower Heliopsis helianthoides var. scabra ox-eye Hesperostipa spartea porcupine grass Liatris aspera rough blazing star Lilium philadelphicum wood lily Monarda fistulosa wild bergamot Muhlenbergia cuspidata Plains muhly Oxalis stricta yellow wood sorrel Parthenocissus vitacea woodbine Phlox pilosa var. fulgida prairie phlox Poa pratensis Kentucky bluegrass Prunus nigra Canada plum Prunus serotina black cherry Prunus virginiana chokecherry Ratibida pinnata gray-headed coneflower Rhamnus cathartica common buckthorn Rhus glabra smooth sumac Rubus occidentalis black raspberry Salix humilis prairie willow Schizachyrium scoparium var. scoparium little bluestem © 2020 MinnesotaSeasons.com. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 Oronoco Prairie SNA Plant List Herbarium Scientific Name Minnesota DNR Common Name Status Silphium laciniatum compass plant Solidago missouriensis Missouri goldenrod Solidago rigida stiff goldenrod Solidago sp. goldenrod Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass Sporobolus heterolepis prairie dropseed Symphyotrichum ericoides heath aster Symphyotrichum oolentangiense skyblue aster Symphyotrichum sericeum silky aster Triosteum aurantiacum orange-fruit horse gentian Vitis riparia wild grape Zanthoxylum americanum prickly ash Zigadenus elegans white camas Zizia aptera heart-leaved alexanders Source: Bell Museum bryophytes (MIN-Bryophytes); Minnesota Biodiversity Atlas, Bell Museum plants (MIN-Plants); and Minnesota Biological Survey vegetation releves; Retrieved 07/15/2020 7/15/2020 © 2020 MinnesotaSeasons.com. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Assessment for Iowa Moonwort (Botrychium Campestre)
    Conservation Assessment for Iowa Moonwort (Botrychium campestre) Botrychium campestre. Drawing provided by USDA Forest Service USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region 2001 Prepared by: Steve Chadde & Greg Kudray for USDA Forest Service, Region 9 This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for Iowa Moonwort (Botrychium campestre) 2 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES.............................................................. 4 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY .................................................. 5 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES .................................................................... 5 LIFE HISTORY...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Botrychium, Ophioglossaceae) on Local to Global Scales
    Evolution of moonwort ferns (Botrychium, Ophioglossaceae) on local to global scales Thèse présentée à la Faculté des sciences Institut de biologie Laboratoire de génétique évolutive Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse Pour l’obtention du grade de DOCTEUR ÈS SCIENCES Par Benjamin Dauphin Présenté aux membres du jury de thèse: P.D. Dr Grant Jason, directeur de thèse et président du jury Prof. Daniel Croll, rapporteur Prof. Donald Farrar, rapporteur Prof. Felix Kessler, rapporteur Dr Michael Kessler, examinateur Prof. Carl Rothfels, examinateur Soutenue le 17 octobre 2017 1 2 Faculté des Sciences Secrétariat-décanat de Faculté Rue Emile-Argand 11 2000 Neuchâtel – Suisse Tél : + 41 (0)32 718 21 00 E-mail : [email protected] IMPRIMATUR POUR THESE DE DOCTORAT La Faculté des sciences de l'Université de Neuchâtel autorise l'impression de la présente thèse soutenue par Monsieur Benjamin DAUPHIN Titre: “Evolution of moonwort ferns (Botrychium, Ophioglossaceae) on local to global scales” sur le rapport des membres du jury composé comme suit: ñ MER Jason Grant, directeur de thèse, Université de Neuchâtel ñ Prof. Daniel Croll, Université de Neuchâtel ñ Prof. Donald R. Farrar, Iowa State University, USA ñ Prof. Felix Kessler, Université de Neuchâtel ñ Dr Michael Kessler, Universität Zürich ñ Prof. Carl Rothfels, University of California, Berkeley, USA Neuchâtel, le 9 novembre 2017 Le Doyen, Prof. R. Bshary Imprimatur pour thèse de doctorat www.unine.ch/sciences 2 «Fais de ta vie un rêve, et d’un rêve, une réalité» Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (1900–1944) 3 4 Acknowledgments This PhD was an intense and marvelous life experience for me.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Profile: Minnesota DNR
    Species profile: Minnesota DNR events | a-z list | newsroom | about DNR | contact us Recreation | Destinations | Nature | Education / safety | Licenses / permits / regs. Home > Nature > Rare Species Guide > Keyword Search | A-Z Search | Filtered Search Botrychium campestre W.H. Wagner & Farrar ex W.H. & F. Prairie Wagner Moonwort MN Status: Basis for Listing special concern Federal Status: Botrychium campestre was first none discovered in 1982 and described eight CITES: years later (Wagner and Wagner 1990). none Until that time, no one knew that USFS: Botrychium spp. (moonworts) occurred in none prairies. The discovery sparked considerable interest among botanists in Group: finding more sites of this species, and in vascular plant trying to find out if other undescribed Class: moonworts could be found. Results have Ophioglossopsida been quite impressive; we now know that Order: B. campestre ranges across the whole Ophioglossales continent. Botanists have also discovered Family: previously undescribed species of Ophioglossaceae Botrychium from prairies and a variety of Life Form: prairie-like habitats. The actual rarity of forb B. campestre is difficult to judge at this Longevity: time. There are now numerous records, perennial but they are the result of an Leaf Duration: unprecedented search effort. Further deciduous searches will undoubtedly discover Water Regime: additional sites, and it is possible that at terrestrial some time in the future B. campestre will Soils: be thought of as relatively common. Map Interpretation sand, loam Botrychium campestre was listed as a Light: special concern species in Minnesota in full sun 1996. Habitats: Upland Prairie Description Botrychium campestre is a small, Best time to see: inconspicuous fern that can be very difficult to find.
    [Show full text]
  • The Botrychiaceae of Alberta
    The Botrychiaceae of Alberta a survey of element occurrences of the genera Botrychium and Sceptridium in Alberta A Report by Patrick Williston MNIUM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH To Resource Data Division Alberta Sustainable Resource Development January 2002 THE BOTRYCHIACEAE OF ALBERTA a survey of element occurrences of the genera Botrychium and Sceptridium in Alberta Botrychium ‘michiganense’ 1 INTRODUCTION With 14 listed species, the moonworts, those ferns belonging to the genus Botrychium, are the largest group of rare ferns in Alberta (Gould 2001). This group has appropriately attracted the attention of organizations and government agencies responsible for maintaining biological diversity, both within the province and abroad. With a view to assessing the conservation status of the moonworts, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development funded the publication of a small book that addressed the taxonomy and distributional ecology of these ferns within Alberta (Williston 2001). In the adjacent United States, rare Botrychium species have been the focus of no fewer than six recent reports and conservation strategies (Zika 1994; Zika et al. 1995; Vanderhorst 1997; Hopkins 1999; Farrar 2001; Kolb & Spribille 2001). In 2001, a project was initiated by Alberta Sustainable Resource Development to identify potential threats to these species and their habitats in Alberta. The objectives of the project were to revisit known populations of rare Botrychium species, search for new populations, document (using photographs and Vegetation Description Forms) the characteristics of their habitats, and evaluate potential threats to their security. A synthesis of the data collected during this project is presented in this summary report. METHODS A list of all historical locations of Botrychium populations based upon herbarium collections and additional records from the provincial rare plant database was obtained from the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre (ANHIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Botrychium Echo WH Wagner
    Botrychium echo W.H. Wagner (reflected grapefern): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 22, 2004 David G. Anderson and Daniel Cariveau Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Anderson, D.G. and D. Cariveau (2004, July 22). Botrychium echo W.H. Wagner (reflected grapefern): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/botrychiumecho.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was greatly facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Don Farrar, Cindy Johnson-Groh, Warren Hauk, Peter Root, Dave Steinmann, Florence Wagner, and Loraine Yeatts. Their interest in the project and time spent answering our questions were extremely valuable. Dr. Kathleen Ahlenslager provided valuable assistance and literature. The Natural Heritage Program/Natural Heritage Inventory/Natural Diversity Database Botanists we consulted (Ben Franklin, Bonnie Heidel) were also extremely helpful. Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, Beth Burkhart, and Joy Bartlett assisted with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum, Carmen Morales, Betty Eckert, Candyce Jeffery, and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Others who provided information and assistance include Annette Miller, Dave Steinmann, Janet Wingate, and Loraine Yeatts. Loraine Yeatts provided the excellent photograph of Botrychium echo for use in this document. Janet Wingate granted permission to use the illustration of B. echo, and Dave Steinmann provided the photograph of Botrychium habitat. We are grateful to the Colorado Natural Heritage Program staff (Fagan Johnson, Jim Gionfriddo, Jill Handwerk, and Susan Spackman) who reviewed the first draft of this document, and to the two anonymous peer reviewers for their excellent suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Report Species - Botrychium Campestre
    Comprehensive Report Species - Botrychium campestre << Previous | Next >> View Glossary Botrychium campestre - W.H. Wagner & Farrar ex W.H. & F. Wagner Prairie Dunewort Search for Images on Google Other English Common Names: Iowa Moonwort, Plains Grapefern, Prairie Moonwort Taxonomic Status: Accepted Related ITIS Name(s): Botrychium campestre W.H. Wagner & Farrar (TSN 501018) French Common Names: botryche champêtre, botryche des champs Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.145970 Element Code: PPOPH010W0 Informal Taxonomy: Plants, Vascular - Ferns and relatives Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Plantae Filicinophyta Ophioglossopsida Ophioglossales Ophioglossaceae Botrychium Check this box to expand all report sections: Concept Reference Conservation Status NatureServe Status Global Status: G3G4 Global Status Last Reviewed: 01Nov2011 Global Status Last Changed: 16Jul2002 Rounded Global Status: G3 - Vulnerable Reasons: Botrychium campestre occurs over a fairly broad range in the northern United States and Canada but it is rare in most of this range, with a few areas of modest concentration and several isolated, disjunct populations. However it is inconspicuous and difficult to locate, search efforts early in the spring, suitable for this species, will most likely reveal additional populations as well as provide better assessment of known populations. Nation: United States National Status: N3N4 Nation: Canada National Status: N2 (17Sep2010) U.S. & Canada State/Province Status United Colorado (S1), Illinois (S1), Iowa (S2), Michigan (S2),
    [Show full text]
  • Botrychium Campestre Var. Lineare
    Botrychium campestre var. lineare Family: Ophioglossaceae Genus: Botrychium Species: Botrychium campestre var. lineare (W. H. Wagner) Farrar comb. nov. ined. Common name: Slender Moonwort Ploidy: Diploid Technical description—A small Botrychium, the leaf 6-18 cm long above the upright subterranean stem 0.5-3.0 cm long. Trophophore sessile to stalked up to 1 cm. Blade oblong, 1-pinnate. Pinna pairs 4-6, strongly separated by 2-5 times the width of segments, to moderately ascending, approximately equal in length, except for shorter apical 1-4 pairs of segments. Pinnae mostly straight, slightly upcurved, narrowly linear (narrowest in small plants), often expanded at the truncate apex or rarely linear- spatulate, commonly bifid with linear lobes. Color pale green; texture thick chartaceous, rigid. Sporophore 1-2 times the length of trophophore, with a single major axis. (Wagner and Wagner, 1994 as B. lineare) Taxonomy Botrychium lineare was described as a new species in 1994 by W. H. Wagner (Wagner and Wagner, American Fern Journal 84:5-10), based on type specimens from Wollowa Co., Oregon. Silhouettes of the species are included in that publication. From a genetic comparison of B. lineare and B. campestre throughout the range of these two taxa, D. R. Farrar concluded that these taxa are best treated as varieties of a single species, B. campestre (see discussion below). In describing B. lineare, Wagner recognized its close relationship to B. campestre. Genetic identity, a statistical measure of the allelic similarity between taxa, between these two species at a value 0.8 (see Moonwort Systematics) is much higher that that generally expected between species within a genus (usually 0.7 or lower).
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for Designating Plant Species of Special Concern and Significant Natural Communities
    Criteria for Designating Plant Species of Special Concern and Significant Natural Communities As described in the recently updated Goals and Policies of the Environmental Resources Elements (the ERE) of the Boulder County Comprehensive Plan, Species of Special Concern include the flora and fauna in the county whose populations may be threatened or endangered, locally rare, experiencing long-term non-cyclical population declines, isolated or restricted to distinct local habitat types, or native species which have ceased to exist within Boulder County. As provided for in Goal B.2 of the ERE, the Boulder County Species of Special Concern List (SSC List) includes this compilation of rare plants and significant natural communities of special status that warrant protection in order to prevent population or habitat loss. The list was developed through consultation with botany and plant ecology professionals in federal, state, and local governmental agencies, non- governmental conservation organizations, local universities, and private consultants, as well as Boulder County conservation experts. The majority of species and communities appearing on this list are recognized by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). CNHP is a non-profit organization sponsored by Colorado State University that tracks and ranks Colorado’s rare and imperiled species and habitats. The list comprises species CNHP ranks as critically imperiled, imperiled, or vulnerable to extirpation globally (G1-G3) or statewide (S1-S3). Species ranked as more secure or secure (G4-G5, S4-S5) are excluded from the list. The SSC List is intended to comprehensively document Boulder County species and communities as they exist today. To be listed on the SSC List, a species/community must meet at least one of the required or two or more of the conditional criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Botrychium Echo WH Wagner
    Botrychium echo W.H. Wagner (reflected grapefern): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 22, 2004 David G. Anderson and Daniel Cariveau Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Anderson, D.G. and D. Cariveau (2004, July 22). Botrychium echo W.H. Wagner (reflected grapefern): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/botrychiumecho.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was greatly facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Don Farrar, Cindy Johnson-Groh, Warren Hauk, Peter Root, Dave Steinmann, Florence Wagner, and Loraine Yeatts. Their interest in the project and time spent answering our questions were extremely valuable. Dr. Kathleen Ahlenslager provided valuable assistance and literature. The Natural Heritage Program/Natural Heritage Inventory/Natural Diversity Database Botanists we consulted (Ben Franklin, Bonnie Heidel) were also extremely helpful. Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, Beth Burkhart, and Joy Bartlett assisted with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum, Carmen Morales, Betty Eckert, Candyce Jeffery, and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Others who provided information and assistance include Annette Miller, Dave Steinmann, Janet Wingate, and Loraine Yeatts. Loraine Yeatts provided the excellent photograph of Botrychium echo for use in this document. Janet Wingate granted permission to use the illustration of B. echo, and Dave Steinmann provided the photograph of Botrychium habitat. We are grateful to the Colorado Natural Heritage Program staff (Fagan Johnson, Jim Gionfriddo, Jill Handwerk, and Susan Spackman) who reviewed the first draft of this document, and to the two anonymous peer reviewers for their excellent suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment
    Conservation Assessment for 13 Species of Moonworts (Botrychium Swartz Subgenus Botrychium) April 18, 2007 Kathy Ahlenslager and Laura Potash USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington Table of Contents Page Disclaimer……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Executive Summary Taxonomic Group and Species…………………………………………………… 3 Management Status……………………………………………………….………. 3 Range & Habitat…………………………………………………………….…….. 4 Threats……………………………………………………...................................... 5 Management Considerations…………………………………………………........ 5 Research, Inventory, and Monitoring Opportunities…………………………..….. 6 List of Tables and Figures……………………………………….……………....….…... 7 List of Appendices………………………………………..…….………………..………. 8 I. Introduction………………………………….………………..…………………........ 9 A. Goal……………………………………………………..…………………...… 9 B. Scope………..………………………….………………..…………………….. 9 C. Management Status……………………………….…………….……..…….… 10 II Classification and Descriptions…………………….……………..…………….....… 17 A. Systematics and Synonymy…………..……………………………..........….... 17 B. Identification of Botrychium………………..……………………….…..…..… 19 III. Biology and Ecology………………………………………………………..…..….... 22 A. Life Cycle.…………..……………………….……………………………...…. 22 B. Population Genetics……………………………………………………………. 23 C. Mycorrhizal Relationships…………………………………………….…….… 25 D. Spores, Dispersal Mechanisms, Loss of Spores, Cryptic Phases……………… 26 E. Life History Characteristics (Recruitment, Survival, Lifespan, and Population Dynamics)………………………………………………………….…...…. 28 F. Range,
    [Show full text]
  • Botrychium Campestre W.H
    Botrychium campestre W.H. Wagner & Farrar prairie moonwort State Distribution Best Survey Period Photo by Gary Reese Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Status: State threatened mainland portions of Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore. A substantial population is known from Global and state rank: G3/S2 Grand Sable Dunes in Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore, and inland populations have been discov- Other common names: dunewort, moonwort, grape- ered in the Camp Grayling Military Reservation in fern Crawford County. Family: Ophioglossaceae (adder’s-tongue) Recognition: Wagner & Wagner (1990) note that Synonyms: Botrychium matricariifolium A. Br. prairie dunewort can be distinguished from all other moonworts by its combination of characters: occur- Taxonomy: This grape-fern species was discovered in rence in exposed prairie or dunes habitats; very 1982, when it was found simultaneously in Iowa and in early appearance in the spring; the masses of Michigan during early summer surveys (Wagner & minute round gemmae (vegetative propagules) on Wagner 1990). According to Wagner and Wagner, the stem, and the usually sessile (stalkless) or Michigan’s dune-inhabiting plants were first thought to subsessile leaves with more or less deeply incised, represent a different species or possibly a subspecies of narrowly and asymmetrically flabellate (fan- the new taxon, owing to morphological differences shaped) segments. Botrychium campestre is similar to observed in early collections. Ultimately, plants of the the widespread B. minganense Victorin. (mingan Great Lakes region and those of Iowa were determined moonwort), with which it may commonly occur. to be the same taxon. Botrychium minganense can be distinguished by its generally larger size, its flat (as opposed to longitudi- Total range: Botrychium campestre is concentrated in nally infolded) leaves with unlobed basal pinnae the upper Great Lakes region, western Iowa, and (lateral division of leaf).
    [Show full text]
  • Zika, Richard Brainerd, & Bruce Newhouse
    Grapeferns and Moonworts (Bo@ychium, Ophioglossaceae) in the Columbia Basin. A report submitted to the Eastside Ecosystem Managment Project, US Forest Service, Walla Walla, Washington. By: Peter F. Zika, Richard Brainerd, & Bruce Newhouse January 1995 Table of Contents ’ Introduction . :. :. :. : . .+:L 4 Biogeography ..................... .I. ......... 4 Species covered ........................ 4 Taxonomic literature .................... 5 Hybrids ..................... : :. 7 . I Rangemaps ........................... Data collection ................... 8 Mapping ....................... 9 caveats ......................... 9 Biodiversity .......................... 10 Species richness .:-i ................ f ..... 11 Rarespecies .................... 11 Endemism ............... .‘: ............ 11 , ................ 13 Centers of Idiversity Major spi=dies ................................ 14 Criteria for individual treatment ............. 14 Species groupings by habitat ............... 14 Criteria and definitions .............. 14 Cover types ..................... 16 Criteria for bioindicators .............. 17 Structural stages . : . 18 Bailey’s Ecoregions . .. 18 Key environmental correlates . ..-. 18 ._. I. I . Ecological key functions . :, . .-.I .‘. 18 “SpecialHabitats . I’. .‘. ‘, .‘:‘r”.-: . 1 . ;‘. 19 Suggested conservation measures . 19 . Analysis issues . 20 Research needs ............................. 23 Assumptions ......................... 25 Inventory.. ......................... 25 Monitoring ............................ 26
    [Show full text]