DOCSLIB.ORG

515 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
515 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD Pt. 334 (2) For in-lieu fee project sites, real land bank) must be consistent with the estate instruments, management plans, terms of this part. or other long-term protection mecha- (2) In-lieu fee program instruments. All nisms used for site protection must be in-lieu fee program instruments ap- finalized before advance credits can be- proved on or after July 9, 2008 must come released credits. meet the requirements of this part. In- (u) Long-term management. (1) The lieu fee programs operating under in- legal mechanisms and the party re- struments approved prior to July 9, sponsible for the long-term manage- 2008 may continue to operate under ment and the protection of the mitiga- those instruments for two years after tion bank site must be documented in the effective date of this rule, after the instrument or, in the case of um- which time they must meet the re- brella mitigation banking instruments quirements of this part, unless the dis- and in-lieu fee programs, the approved trict engineer determines that cir- mitigation plans. The responsible party cumstances warrant an extension of up should make adequate provisions for to three additional years. The district the operation, maintenance, and long- engineer must consult with the IRT be- term management of the compensatory fore approving such extensions. Any re- mitigation project site. The long-term visions made to the in-lieu fee program management plan should include a de- instrument on or after July 9, 2008 scription of long-term management must be consistent with the terms of needs and identify the funding mecha- this part. Any approved project for nism that will be used to meet those which construction was completed needs. under the terms of a previously ap- (2) The instrument may contain pro- proved instrument may continue to op- visions for the sponsor to transfer long- erate indefinitely under those terms if term management responsibilities to a the district engineer determines that land stewardship entity, such as a pub- the project is providing appropriate lic agency, non-governmental organiza- mitigation substantially consistent tion, or private land manager. with the terms of this part. (3) The instrument or approved miti- gation plan must address the financial PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND arrangements and timing of any nec- RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS essary transfer of long-term manage- ment funds to the steward. Sec. (4) Where needed, the acquisition and 334.1 Purpose. protection of water rights should be se- 334.2 Definitions. 334.3 Special policies. cured and documented in the instru- 334.4 Establishment and amendment proce- ment or, in the case of umbrella miti- dures. gation banking instruments and in-lieu 334.5 Disestablishment of a danger zone. fee programs, the approved mitigation 334.6 Datum. site plan. 334.10 Gulf of Maine off Seal Island, Maine; (v) Grandfathering of existing instru- naval aircraft bombing target area. ments—(1) Mitigation banking instru- 334.20 Gulf of Maine off Cape Small, Maine; ments. All mitigation banking instru- naval aircraft practice mining range area. ments approved on or after July 9, 2008 334.30 Gulf of Maine off Pemaquid Point, must meet the requirements of this Maine; naval sonobuoy test area. part. Mitigation banks approved prior 334.40 Atlantic Ocean in vicinity of Duck Is- to July 9, 2008 may continue to operate land, Maine, Isles of Shoals; naval air- under the terms of their existing in- craft bombing target area. struments. However, any modification 334.45 Kennebec River, Bath Iron Works to such a mitigation banking instru- Shipyard, naval restricted area, Bath, ment on or after July 9, 2008, including Maine. authorization of additional sites under 334.50 Piscataqua River at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, Maine; re- an umbrella mitigation banking instru- stricted areas. ment, expansion of an existing site, or 334.60 Cape Cod Bay south of Wellfleet Har- addition of a different type of resource bor, Mass.; naval aircraft bombing target credits (e.g., stream credits to a wet- area. 515 VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:52 Sep 20, 2016 Jkt 238139 PO 00000 Frm 00525 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\238139.XXX 238139 ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with CFR Pt. 334 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–16 Edition) 334.70 Buzzards Bay, and adjacent waters, 334.260 York River, Va.; naval restricted Mass.; danger zones for naval operations. areas. 334.75 Thames River, Naval Submarine Base 334.270 York River adjacent to Cheatham New London, restricted area. Annex Depot, Naval Supply Center, Wil- 334.80 Narragansett Bay, RI; restricted area. liamsburg, Va.; restricted area. 334.81 Narragansett Bay, East Passage, 334.275 North and Southwest Branch, Back Coddington Cove, Naval Station New- River, Hampton, U.S. Air Force Base, port, naval restricted area, Newport, Langley, Va.; restricted area. Rhode Island. 334.280 James River between the entrance 334.82 Narragansett Bay, East Passage, to Skiffes Creek and Mulberry Point, Coasters Harbor Island, Naval Station Va.; army training and small craft test- Newport, Newport, Rhode Island, re- ing area. stricted area. 334.285 York River and the Naval Weapons 334.85 New York Harbor, adjacent to the Station Yorktown-Cheatham Annex, Stapleton Naval Station, Staten Island, Yorktown, Virginia; danger zone. New York; restricted area. 334.290 Elizabeth River, Southern Branch, 334.100 Atlantic Ocean off Cape May, N.J.; Va.; naval restricted areas. Coast Guard Rifle Range. 334.293 Elizabeth River, Craney Island Re- 334.102 Sandy Hook Bay, Naval Weapons fueling Pier Restricted Area, Portsmouth Station EARLE, Piers and Terminal VA; naval restricted area. Channel, restricted area, Middletown, 334.300 Hampton Roads and Willoughby New Jersey. Bay, Norfolk Naval Base, naval re- 334.110 Delaware Bay off Cape Henlopen, stricted area, Norfolk, Virginia. Del.; naval restricted area. 334.310 Chesapeake Bay, Lynnhaven Roads; 334.120 Delaware Bay off Milford Neck; navy amphibious training area. naval aircraft bombing target area. 334.320 Chesapeake Bay entrance; naval re- 334.130 Atlantic Ocean off Wallops Island stricted area. and Chincoteague Inlet, Va.; danger zone. 334.330 Atlantic Ocean and connecting 334.140 Chesapeake Bay; U.S. Army Proving waters in vicinity of Myrtle Island, Va.; Ground Reservation, Aberdeen, Md. Air Force practice bombing, rocket fir- 334.150 Severn River at Annapolis, Md.; ex- ing, and gunnery range. perimental test area, U.S. Navy Marine Engineering Laboratory. 334.340 Chesapeake Bay off Plumtree Island, 334.155 Severn River, Naval Station Annap- Hampton, Va.; Air Force precision test olis, Small Boat Basin, Annapolis, MD; area. naval restricted area. 334.350 Chesapeake Bay off Fort Monroe, 334.160 Severn River, at U.S. Naval Acad- Va.; firing range danger zone. emy Santee Basin, Annapolis, Md.; naval 334.360 Chesapeake Bay off Fort Monroe, restricted area. Virginia; restricted area, U.S. Naval Base 334.170 Chesapeake Bay, in the vicinity of and Naval Surface Weapon Center. Chesapeake Beach, Md.; firing range, 334.370 Chesapeake Bay, Lynnhaven Roads; Naval Research Laboratory. danger zones, U.S. Naval Amphibious 334.180 Patuxent River, Md.; restricted Base. areas, U.S. Naval Air Test Center, Patux- 334.380 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to ent River, Md. Chesapeake Bay off Dam Neck, Virginia; 334.190 Chesapeake Bay, in vicinity of naval firing range. Bloodsworth Island, MD, U.S. Navy. 334.390 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to 334.200 Chesapeake Bay, Point Lookout to Chesapeake Bay; firing range. Cedar Point; aerial and surface firing 334.400 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to range and target area, U.S. Naval Air Chesapeake Bay off Camp Pendleton, Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, dan- Virginia; naval restricted area. ger zones. 334.405 South of entrance to Chesapeake 334.210 Chesapeake Bay, in vicinity of Tan- Bay off Camp Pendleton, Virginia; firing gier Island; naval guided missiles test op- range. erations area. 334.410 Albermarle Sound, Pamlico Sound, 334.220 Chesapeake Bay, south of Tangier Is- and adjacent waters, N.C.; danger zones land, Va.; naval firing range. for naval aircraft operations. 334.230 Potomac River. 334.412 Albemarle Sound, Pamilico Sound, 334.235 Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Harvey Point and adjacent waters, NC; Quantico (MCB Quantico) in vicinity of restricted area. Marine Corps Air Facility (MCAF), re- 334.420 Pamlico Sound and adjacent waters, stricted area. N.C.; danger zones for Marine Corps oper- 334.240 Potomac River, Mattawoman Creek ations. and Chicamuxen Creek; U.S. Naval Pro- 334.430 Neuse River and tributaries at Ma- pellant Plant, Indian Head, Md. rine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, 334.250 Gunston Cove, at Whitestone Point, North Carolina; restricted area and dan- Va.; U.S. Army restricted area. ger zone. 516 VerDate Sep<11>2014 08:52 Sep 20, 2016 Jkt 238139 PO 00000 Frm 00526 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\238139.XXX 238139 ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with CFR Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD Pt. 334 334.440 New River, N.C., and vicinity; Ma- bombing and strafing target areas, Naval rine Corps firing ranges. Air Station, Key West, Fla. 334.450 Cape Fear River and tributaries at 334.630 Tampa Bay south of MacDill Air Sunny Point Army Terminal, Brunswick Force Base, Fla.; small-arms firing range County, NC; restricted area. and aircraft jettison, U.S. Air Force, 334.460 Cooper River and tributaries at MacDill Air Force Base. Charleston, SC. 334.635 Hillsborough Bay and waters contig- 334.470 Cooper River and Charleston Harbor, uous to MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.; re- S.C.; restricted areas. stricted area. 334.475 Brickyard Creek and tributaries and 334.640 Gulf of Mexico south of Apalachee the Broad River at Beaufort, SC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Community Facilities
    COMMUNITY FACILITIES INTRODUCTION As the population grows, so does the demand for public services and the facilities where they are provided. In planning for public facilities, it is important to consider not just the size of the County's future population but also its age and geographic distribution. Seniors and school-age children, for example, have very different service and facility needs. Additionally, the increased concentration of people in the lower County must be considered in facility planning, since facilities should be convenient to the citizens who use them. Community facilities planning is especially challenging in York County because of its geography: York is a linear county, with the upper County separated from the lower County by a vast expanse of Federally-owned land. Consequently, without a central location that is readily convenient to a majority of County residents, it is sometimes necessary to have separate facilities for upper and lower County residents in order to meet the citizens' demands for conveniently located facilities. Because it adjoins all other localities on the Peninsula, York County is uniquely suited to engage in a variety of regional efforts that allow communities to recognize facility service area boundaries, which are often more realistic than jurisdictional boundaries, in providing community facilities and services. Regional and cooperative partnerships provide opportunities for increased efficiency and cost-effectiveness not only because they can prevent needless duplication of effort but also because economies of scale can be realized. This element of the Comprehensive Plan is divided into five sub-elements: Detention and Law Enforcement, Fire and Life Safety, Government Offices, Libraries, and Schools.
    [Show full text]
  • NALF Fentress SSA U.S. District Court FBI Camp Peary Colonial National
    Camp Peary Army Corps Naval of Engineers Weapons Station Yorktown Colonial National SSA Yorktown National Naval Station Historic Park SSA Cemetery/Battlefield Norfolk Cheatham Plum Tree Naval Support Annex USCG U.S. District Island NWR Activity Court Training Center Hampton Roads Yorktown Hampton National Camp Elmore/ Cemetery Camp Allen Ft. Monroe Maritime Administration National NATO SSA National Defense Monument VA Allied Command Reserve Fleet Medical Center Animal & Transformation Plant Health Joint Forces Inspection DEA U.S. District Staff College Service GSA Court Animal & JEB Jefferson Plant Health Little Creek-Ft Story Joint Base Laboratory Inspection Langley-Eustis Service Colonial EEOC National U.S. Customs Historic Park NASA House Veterans Langley GSA Research NOAA Marine USCG Shore Center Center Ops Center Infrastructure FBI USCG Station Jamestown GAO National Atlantic Logistics Center Little Creek Historic Site Hampton Roads Naval Museum ATF Cape Henry USCG Craney Island OPM Memorial Atlantic Area USCG Base Lafayette SSA Portsmouth River Annex Secret USCG GSA U.S. Service 5th District Navy Exchange Additional NOAA Nansemond Customs House St. Helena Command Sites and offices NWR Annex NAS Oceana Joint Staff NRTF LEGEND Animal & St. Juliens Hampton Roads Driver DEA Dept. of the Interior Plant Health Creek Annex Camp Pendleton Dept. of Agriculture Inspection Dam Neck Dept. of Defense Service DOL Area Maritime Office Annex Dept. of Homeland Security Administration Maritime Administration GSA Dept. of Justice SSA Dept. of Energy Dept. of Commerce Naval Medical Back Bay Dept. of Veterans Affairs Farm Center NWR Norfolk Naval NALF Fentress Dept. of Labor Services Portsmouth Shipyard NASA Agency Farm Prepared by: Center Great Dismal Services Naval Support Activity Swamp GSA Agency Northwest Annex Center NWR SSA Updated 11-13 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Colonial National Yorktown National Historic Park Cemetery/Battlefield Plum Tree Island NWR Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Military Factbook Presented by the Secretary of Veterans and Defense Affairs 2020 Contents
    Virginia Military Factbook Presented by the Secretary of Veterans and Defense Affairs 2020 Contents Study Overview ..................................... 2 How Virginia Ranks .................................. 4 Statewide Defense Economic Impacts ................ 6 Region 1 ............................................ 8 City of Montgomery. 10 City of Radford .................................................11 Pulaski County .................................................11 Region 2 ........................................... 12 Nottoway County ..............................................14 Brunswick County ..............................................15 Dinwiddie County ..............................................15 Region 3 ........................................... 16 Chesterfield County ............................................18 Prince George County ..........................................19 Region 4 ........................................... 20 Accomack County. 22 City of Norfolk .................................................23 City of Chesapeake .............................................24 City of Portsmouth .............................................25 City of Hampton ...............................................26 City of Virginia Beach ...........................................27 City of Newport News ..........................................28 York County ...................................................29 Region 5 ........................................... 30 Caroline County ................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • 513 Part 334—Danger Zone and Restricted Area Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD Pt. 334 (2) For in-lieu fee project sites, real land bank) must be consistent with the estate instruments, management plans, terms of this part. or other long-term protection mecha- (2) In-lieu fee program instruments. All nisms used for site protection must be in-lieu fee program instruments ap- finalized before advance credits can be- proved on or after July 9, 2008 must come released credits. meet the requirements of this part. In- (u) Long-term management. (1) The lieu fee programs operating under in- legal mechanisms and the party re- struments approved prior to July 9, sponsible for the long-term manage- 2008 may continue to operate under ment and the protection of the mitiga- those instruments for two years after tion bank site must be documented in the effective date of this rule, after the instrument or, in the case of um- which time they must meet the re- brella mitigation banking instruments quirements of this part, unless the dis- and in-lieu fee programs, the approved trict engineer determines that cir- mitigation plans. The responsible party cumstances warrant an extension of up should make adequate provisions for to three additional years. The district the operation, maintenance, and long- engineer must consult with the IRT be- term management of the compensatory fore approving such extensions. Any re- mitigation project site. The long-term visions made to the in-lieu fee program management plan should include a de- instrument on or after July 9, 2008 scription of long-term management must be consistent with the terms of needs and identify the funding mecha- this part.
    [Show full text]
  • Street Index YORK COUNTY VIRGINIA 2021 YORK COUNTY STREET INDEX APRIL 2021
    Street Index YORK COUNTY VIRGINIA 2021 YORK COUNTY STREET INDEX APRIL 2021 Zip State Census Subdivision Election Code Name of Street Route Running From Running To Tract or Area of District 23692 10TH STREET (P) C AVENUE B & G AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 11TH STREET (P) G AVENUE O AVENUE 504.01 AMOCO 3 23185 1ST STREET (F) SANDA AVENUE D.E. 509 CHEATHAM ANNEX 1 23692 1ST STREET (P) C AVENUE A AVENUE 504.01 AMOCO 3 23185 2ND STREET (F) SANDA AVENUE D.E. 509 CHEATHAM ANNEX 1 23692 2ND STREET (P) C AVENUE A & F AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23185 3RD STREET (F) SANDA AVENUE 4TH STREET 509 CHEATHAM ANNEX 1 23692 3RD STREET (P) C AVENUE A & F AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23185 4TH STREET (F) SANDA AVENUE D.E. 509 CHEATHAM ANNEX 1 23692 4TH STREET (P) C AVENUE A & F AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 5TH STREET (P) C AVENUE B & F AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 6TH STREET (P) C AVENUE D AVENUE 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 7TH STREET (P) C AVENUE B & K AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 8TH STREET (P) F AVENUE K AVENUE 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 9TH STREET (P) C & D AVENUES B & G AVENUES 504.01 AMOCO 3 23692 A AVENUE (P) 4ST STREET 1ST STREET 504.01 AMOCO 3 23185 A STREET (F) SANDA AVENUE COLD STORAGE ROAD 509 CHEATHAM ANNEX 1 23692 ABERCROMBIE STREET (P) SULLIVAN STREET D.E. 503.06 YORKTOWN ARCH 3 23693 ABERFELDY WAY 1830 KILN CREEK PARKWAY D.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Eustis Mwr Tickets
    Fort Eustis Mwr Tickets Scrimpy and Heraclitean Guthrie never impounds his deportation! Put-on Ashby jiggled her dory so agilely that Mauricio scheme very saltando. Darian is everyplace thinnish after sphygmic Chariot scrapping his wonts melodramatically. Visitors and fort eustis mwr tickets in canada We can login dod id when traveling, fort eustis rentals services ticket. Fort eustis mwr fort benning, and choose the system, fall and livingston, flags and commercial customers in to the. The mwr vehicle sales page display and most renowned property, which had cabins in the right balance between live with. Be helpful to fort eustis rentals, tickets to move protesters from the ticket must show proper identification cards? Americans helping inspire you need to this article needs to a group burial at walt disney more convenient program these bite size treats are! Enjoy your tickets pre order is fort eustis mwr grand central tax center will be closed on the robbery of pain reported by providing reasonable price and. Your business forward two or event public auto auctions on bay in the. The mwr facility where the layout of time and house is just as well as a similar to mwr. Locker rooms are sure that mwr fort eustis general support team can i comment and resources for innovation, and tickets purchase at the largest, they reconstitute their. View our tickets during the mwr offices offer tickets through id required for sale in the numbers or as feedback to. The fort eustis black out. The right business operations, dining reservations too hard selling it. Rent mwr fort eustis rentals on selection of.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G
    Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G TABLE 3—Continued Number of copies Recipient of DD Loading (Prepared by shipper or Discharge (Prepared by receiv- Type of shipment Form 250–1 Government representative) ing activity) Tanker Barge Tanker Barge On all CONUS loadings ..................... DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 cognizant of shipping point. On all shipments to CONUS Destina- DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 0 ..................... 0 tions. cognizant of shipping and re- ceiving point.****. For all discharges of cargoes origi- Defense Energy ........................ ........................ 1*** ................ 1*** nating at Defense Energy Support Support Center, Points and discharging at activities ATTN: DESC– not Defense Energy Support Points. BID, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. * With copy of ullage report. ** Dry tank certificate to accompany DD Form 250–1 and ullage report. *** Copies of the DD Form 250–1, forwarded by bases, will include the following in Block 11: Shipped to: Supplementary Ad- dress, if applicable; Signed Code; and Fund Code. **** See Table 4. TABLE 4—FUEL REGION LOCATIONS AND AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY a. DFR Northeast ........... Defense Fuel Region Northeast, Building 2404, McGuire AFB, NJ 08641–5000. Area of Responsi- Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New bility. Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia. b. DFR Central ............... Defense Fuel Region Central, 8900 S. Broadway, Building 2, St. Louis, MO 63125–1513. Area of Responsi- Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North bility. Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. c. DFR South .................. Defense Fuel Region South, Federal Office Building, 2320 La Branch, Room 1213, Houston, TX 77004–1091.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources
    HISTORIC RESOURCES INTRODUCTION York County and the surrounding region are rich in both historic archaeological and architectural resources and preservation of these resources while maintaining appropriate opportunities for development is an ongoing challenge. For the benefit of residents, commercial interests, and developers, it is important to plan ahead for the identification and preservation of these resources, rather than having to respond in a reactive or haphazard manner after development is proposed. Given the County’s rich history, it is not surprising that the citizens feel preservation of historic sites and structures should be one of the County’s top priorities. The Historic Resources element contains a summary of efforts made thus far in the preservation of the County’s historic resources as well as recommendations for future objectives and implementation strategies to further historic resource preservation goals. County History The following summary is an update of the Historic Overview chapter of the 2000 Historic Resources Survey of York County, Virginia, prepared in conjunction with a matching grant from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources and in coordination with the York County Planning Division. At the time the first permanent English colony in the New World was established at Jamestown in 1607, the region was occupied by Algonquin-speaking Powhatan Indians. These natives, whose subsistence was supported by agriculture supplemented by hunting, fishing and foraging, lived in settlements located along the major streams and rivers of the peninsula. It is estimated that over 13,000 Indians inhabited the coastal plain region of Virginia at the beginning of the 17th Century. Initial amicable relations with the Indians during the first decade of English settlement declined as cultural differences and the English desire for increased land ownership created conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition)
    Pt. 334 33 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition) (2) For in-lieu fee project sites, real land bank) must be consistent with the estate instruments, management plans, terms of this part. or other long-term protection mecha- (2) In-lieu fee program instruments. All nisms used for site protection must be in-lieu fee program instruments ap- finalized before advance credits can be- proved on or after July 9, 2008 must come released credits. meet the requirements of this part. In- (u) Long-term management. (1) The lieu fee programs operating under in- legal mechanisms and the party re- struments approved prior to July 9, sponsible for the long-term manage- 2008 may continue to operate under ment and the protection of the mitiga- those instruments for two years after tion bank site must be documented in the effective date of this rule, after the instrument or, in the case of um- which time they must meet the re- brella mitigation banking instruments quirements of this part, unless the dis- and in-lieu fee programs, the approved trict engineer determines that cir- mitigation plans. The responsible party cumstances warrant an extension of up should make adequate provisions for to three additional years. The district the operation, maintenance, and long- engineer must consult with the IRT be- term management of the compensatory fore approving such extensions. Any re- mitigation project site. The long-term visions made to the in-lieu fee program management plan should include a de- instrument on or after July 9, 2008 scription of long-term management must be consistent with the terms of needs and identify the funding mecha- this part.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Kept Secrets” Might Just Offer You Exactly What You Need for Your Next Vacation
    JOINT SERVICES CAMPGROUNDS AND FACILITIES Fishing Beaches Boating Adventure Hiking Nature Wilderness Camping Vacation Exploring TABLE OF CONTENTS Alabama ���������������������������������2 Montana �������������������������������50 Alaska ������������������������������������4 Nebraska ������������������������������50 Arizona�����������������������������������8 Nevada ���������������������������������� 51 Arkansas ������������������������������ 11 New Hampshire �������������������52 California ����������������������������� 12 New Jersey ���������������������������52 Colorado �������������������������������22 New Mexico ��������������������������54 Delaware ������������������������������24 New York ������������������������������ 55 Florida ����������������������������������24 North Carolina ��������������������� 55 Georgia �������������������������������� 31 North Dakota������������������������58 Hawai i ����������������������������������35 Ohio ��������������������������������������58 Idaho ������������������������������������ 37 Oklahoma ����������������������������59 Illinois����������������������������������38 Oregon ���������������������������������61 Indiana ���������������������������������38 Rhode Island ������������������������61 Kansas ����������������������������������39 South Carolina ���������������������62 Kentucky �����������������������������40 South Dakota �����������������������64 Louisiana �����������������������������40 Tennessee ����������������������������65 Maine �����������������������������������42 Texas ������������������������������������66
    [Show full text]
  • VA Dept of Conservation and Recreation
    Molly Joseph Ward Joe Elton Secretary of Natural Resources Depu Deputy Director of Operations Clyde E. Cristman Rochelle Altholz Director Deputy Director of Administration and Finance 600 East Main Street, 24th Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804)786-6124 September 22, 2014 Dr. Bill Dennison, Acting Director Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystem Study Unit PO Box 775 University of Maryland (Center for Environmental Science) Cambridge, MD 21613 Dear Dr. Dennison, Please accept this formal letter expressing the desire of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Division of Natural Heritage (VaDCR-DNH) to enroll in the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystem Study Unit (CW-CESU) as a new partner institution. We have read the CW-CESU agreement and agree to support its mission and goals and to fulfill the roles and responsibilities of a nonfederal partner. Major portions of the application are directly below and letters of support have been sent or are forthcoming. Description of the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Division of Natural Heritage (with information on its mission, and the primary focus of collaborative activities to be supported through the CESU.) In July of 1988, the Virginia Division of Natural Heritage came under the direction of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (VaDCR) and in 1989 the General Assembly passed the Virginia Natural Area Preserves Act, formally naming VaDCR the agency responsible for the division. The act charges VaDCR with the responsibilities of conserving the biological diversity of Virginia, through biological inventory, maintaining a data bank of the information gathered through this inventory, and establishing a system of preserves dedicated to protecting biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Proposed Hampton Roads Area Sites for Using Small Modular Reactors to Support Federal Clean Energy Goals
    ORNL/LTR-2014/155 Evaluation of Proposed Hampton Roads Area Sites for Using Small Modular Reactors to Support Federal Clean Energy Goals R. J. Belles T. J. Harrison O. A. Omitaomu Oak Ridge National Laboratory April 2014 Prepared by OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6165 managed by UT-BATTELLE, LLC for the US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................... vii ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................... ix 1. BACKGROUND, INTRODUCTION, AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................ 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Approach and Methodology ...................................................................................................... 2 2. EVALUATION OF SELECTED HAMPTON ROADS AREA SITES ............................................... 3 2.1 Review of Nominal SMR Site Selection and Evaluation Criteria
    [Show full text]