Ariadne auf Naxos: A Study in Transformation through Contrast and Coalescence
By
Copyright 2015
Etta Fung
Submitted to the graduate degree program in Vocal Performance and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts.
______Chairperson Julia Broxholm
______Paul Laird
______David Alan Street
______Joyce Castle
______Michelle Heffner Hayes
Date Defended: 5/4/2015
i The Thesis Committee for Etta Fung certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis:
Ariadne auf Naxos: A Study in Transformation through Contrast and Coalescence
______Chairperson Julia Broxholm
Date approved: 5/13/15
ii Abstract
Ariadne auf Naxos, by composer Richard Strauss and librettist Hugo von Hofmannsthal, concerns the simultaneous performance of a tragedy and a comedy at a rich man’s house in Vienna, and the conflicts that arise between the two groups. The primary focus of this paper is the character Zerbinetta, a coloratura soprano who is the main performer in the commedia dell’arte troupe.
Following consideration of the opera’s historical background, the first segment of this paper examines Zerbinetta’s duet with the young Composer starting from “Nein Herr, so kommt es nicht…” in the Prologue, which reveals her coquettish yet complex character. The second section offers a detailed description of her twelve-minute aria “Großmächtige Prinzessin” in the opera, exploring the show’s various levels of satire. The last segment is an investigation of the differing perspectives of the performers and the audience during Zerbinetta’s tour de force. The basis for this study is the second version of Ariadne auf Naxos, which premiered in 1916.
iii Compositional background of Ariadne of Naxos
Ariadne auf Naxos was written by German composer Richard Strauss with a libretto by
Hugo von Hofmannsthal. It was originally composed as a divertissement for Hofmannsthal’s adaptation of Molière’s play Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme. The premiere of the opera in 1912 was unsuccessful because the audience who were more interested in the opera had to wait for the play to end. The play and the opera together were six hours in length, obviously a huge demand on the audience. The play-going public had no interest in the opera and the opera-goers did not wish to see the play.1 The first version of Ariadne was quite lengthy, and required a significant number of actors aside from the vocalists, which made it expensive to produce.
Hofmannsthal proposed that Strauss write a second version with a prologue explaining why commedia dell’arte elements are introduced into the tragedy of Ariadne. The second version of the opera premiered in 1916 in Vienna. Although the second version was not received with enthusiasm at the time, it remains as the version performed today and will be the focus of this paper.
Central Idea
Ariadne auf Naxos is a masterpiece that builds on contrasts to achieve a greater unity, which was librettist Hofmannsthal’s favorite technique. Ariadne is an opera-within-an opera. It provides a setting in which a tragedy and a comedy are performed at the same time, leading to a variety of conflicts. Strauss showed little interest when Hofmannsthal first proposed to write
1Norman Del Mar, Richard Strauss: A Critical Commentary on His Life and Works, Volume II (London: Barrie and Rockliff. 1969), 9