Modelling Spatio-Temporal Changes of Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Asian and European Rivers Ratha Sor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886
THE NAUTILUS 101(1):25-32, 1987 Page 25 . North American Hydrobiidae (Gastropoda: Rissoacea): Redescription and Systematic Relationships of Tryonia Stimpson, 1865 and Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886 Robert Hershler Fred G. Thompson Department of Invertebrate Zoology Florida State Museum National Museum of Natural History University of Florida Smithsonian Institution Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Washington, DC 20560, USA ABSTRACT scribed) in the Southwest. Taylor (1966) placed Tryonia in the Littoridininae Taylor, 1966 on the basis of its Anatomical details are provided for the type species of Tryonia turreted shell and glandular penial lobes. It is clear from Stimpson, 1865, Pyrgulopsis Call and Pilsbry, 1886, Fonteli- cella Gregg and Taylor, 1965, and Microamnicola Gregg and the initial descriptions and subsequent studies illustrat- Taylor, 1965, in an effort to resolve the systematic relationships ing the penis (Russell, 1971: fig. 4; Taylor, 1983:16-25) of these taxa, which represent most of the generic-level groups that Fontelicella and its subgenera, Natricola Gregg and of Hydrobiidae in southwestern North America. Based on these Taylor, 1965 and Microamnicola Gregg and Taylor, 1965 and other data presented either herein or in the literature, belong to the Nymphophilinae Taylor, 1966 (see Hyalopyrgus Thompson, 1968 is assigned to Tryonia; and Thompson, 1979). While the type species of Pyrgulop- Fontelicella, Microamnicola, Nat ricola Gregg and Taylor, 1965, sis, P. nevadensis (Stearns, 1883), has not received an- Marstonia F. C. Baker, 1926, and Mexistiobia Hershler, 1985 atomical study, the penes of several eastern species have are allocated to Pyrgulopsis. been examined by Thompson (1977), who suggested that The ranges of both Tryonia and Pyrgulopsis include parts the genus may be a nymphophiline. -
Melanoides Tuberculata), Species Habitat Associations and Life History Investigations in the San Solomon Spring Complex, Texas
FINAL REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-121-R Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation Native springsnails and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculata), species habitat associations and life history investigations in the San Solomon Spring complex, Texas Prepared by: David Rogowski Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 3 October 2012 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-121-R___ GRANT TITLE: Native springsnails and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculata), species habitat associations and life history investigations in the San Solomon Spring complex, Texas. REPORTING PERIOD: ____17 Sep 09 to 31 May 12_ OBJECTIVE(S): To determine patterns of abundance, distribution, and habitat use of the Phantom Cave snail (Cochliopa texana), Phantom Spring tryonia (Tryonia cheatumi), and the invasive red-rim melania snail (Melanoides tuberculta) in San Solomon Springs, and potential interactions. Segment Objectives: Task 1. January - February 2010. A reconnaissance visit(s) will be made to the region to investigate the study area and work on specific sampling procedural methods. Visit with TPWD at the Balmorhea State Park, as well as meet The Nature Conservancy personnel at Diamond Y and Sandia springs complexes. Task 2. March 2010– August 2011. Begin sampling. Field sampling will be conducted every 6-8 weeks, over a period of a year and a half. Sampling methods are outlined below stated Tasks. Task 3. December 2010. Completion of first year of study. With four seasonal samples completed, preliminary data analysis and statistical modeling will begin. Preliminary results will be presented at the Texas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society meeting. -
Molluscs from the Miocene Pebas Formation of Peruvian and Colombian Amazonia
Molluscs from the Miocene Pebas Formation of Peruvian and Colombian Amazonia F.P. Wesselingh, with contributions by L.C. Anderson & D. Kadolsky Wesselingh, F.P. Molluscs from the Miocene Pebas Formation of Peruvian and Colombian Amazonia. Scripta Geologica, 133: 19-290, 363 fi gs., 1 table, Leiden, November 2006. Frank P. Wesselingh, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Nether- lands and Biology Department, University of Turku, Turku SF20014, Finland (wesselingh@naturalis. nnm.nl); Lauri C. Anderson, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, U.S.A. ([email protected]); D. Kadolsky, 66, Heathhurst Road, Sanderstead, South Croydon, Surrey CR2 OBA, England ([email protected]). Key words – Mollusca, systematics, Pebas Formation, Miocene, western Amazonia. The mollusc fauna of the Miocene Pebas Formation of Peruvian and Colombian Amazonia contains at least 158 mollusc species, 73 of which are introduced as new; 13 are described in open nomenclature. Four genera are introduced (the cochliopid genera Feliconcha and Glabertryonia, and the corbulid genera Pachy- rotunda and Concentricavalva) and a nomen novum is introduced for one genus (Longosoma). A neotype is designated for Liosoma glabra Conrad, 1874a. The Pebas fauna is taxonomically dominated by two fami- lies, viz. the Cochliopidae (86 species; 54%) and Corbulidae (23 species; 15%). The fauna can be character- ised as aquatic (155 species; 98%), endemic (114 species; 72%) and extinct (only four species are extant). Many of the families represented by a few species in the Pebas fauna include important ecological groups, such as indicators of marine infl uence (e.g., Nassariidae, one species), terrestrial settings (e.g., Acavidae, one species) and stagnant to marginally agitated freshwaters (e.g., Planorbidae, four species). -
Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication). -
Nominal Taxa of Freshwater Mollusca from Southeast Asia Described by Dr
Ecologica Montenegrina 41: 73-83 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.41.11 https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2ED2B90D-4BF2-4384-ABE2-630F76A1AC54 Nominal taxa of freshwater Mollusca from Southeast Asia described by Dr. Nguyen N. Thach: A brief overview with new synonyms and fixation of a publication date IVAN N. BOLOTOV1,2, EKATERINA S. KONOPLEVA1,2,*, ILYA V. VIKHREV1,2, MIKHAIL Y. GOFAROV1,2, MANUEL LOPES-LIMA3,4,5, ARTHUR E. BOGAN6, ZAU LUNN7, NYEIN CHAN7, THAN WIN8, OLGA V. AKSENOVA1,2, ALENA A. TOMILOVA1, KITTI TANMUANGPAK9, SAKBOWORN TUMPEESUWAN10 & ALEXANDER V. KONDAKOV1,2 1N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Northern Dvina Emb. 23, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia. 2Northern Arctic Federal University, Northern Dvina Emb. 17, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia. 3CIBIO/InBIO – Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal. 4CIIMAR/CIMAR – Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal. 5SSC/IUCN – Mollusc Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for Conservation of Nature, c/o The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, CB2 3QZ Cambridge, United Kingdom. 6North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, 11 West Jones St., Raleigh, NC 27601, United States of America 7Fauna & Flora International – Myanmar Programme, Yangon, Myanmar. 8 Department of Zoology, Dawei University, Dawei, Tanintharyi Region, Myanmar. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of the Cochliopinae (Rissooidea: Hydrobiidae): an Enigmatic Group of Aquatic Gastropods Hsiu-Ping Liu,* Robert Hershler,†,1 and Fred G
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Vol. 21, No. 1, October, pp. 17–25, 2001 doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.0988, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Phylogenetic Relationships of the Cochliopinae (Rissooidea: Hydrobiidae): An Enigmatic Group of Aquatic Gastropods Hsiu-Ping Liu,* Robert Hershler,†,1 and Fred G. Thompson‡ *Department of Biology, Southwest Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, Missouri 65804-0095; †Department of Systematic Biology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0118; and ‡Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7800 Received July 24, 2000; revised March 27, 2001 shler, 1993) have not been well tested as there is no Phylogenetic analysis based on a partial sequence of rigorously proposed analysis of relationships that in- the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I cludes more than a trivial sampling of this large group gene was performed for 26 representatives of the (e.g., Altaba, 1993; Ponder et al., 1993; Ponder, 1999). aquatic gastropod subfamily Cochliopinae, 6 addi- Phylogenetic reconstructions of these animals have tional members of the family Hydrobiidae, and out- been hampered by a paucity of apparent synapomor- group species of the families Rissoidae and Pomatiop- phies (Thompson, 1984), putatively extensive ho- sidae. Maximum-parsimony analysis yielded a single moplasy (Davis, 1988; Hershler and Thompson, 1992), shortest tree which resolved two monophyletic and difficulties in reconciling homology (Hershler and groups: (1) a clade containing all cochliopine taxa with Ponder, 1998). Whereas a recent survey and reassess- the exception of Antroselates and (2) a clade composed of Antroselates and the hydrobiid genus Amnicola. -
Key Determinants of Freshwater Gastropod Diversity and Distribution: the Implications for Conservation and Management
water Article Key Determinants of Freshwater Gastropod Diversity and Distribution: The Implications for Conservation and Management Mi-Jung Bae 1 and Young-Seuk Park 2,* 1 Biodiversity Research Team, Freshwater Biodiversity Research Bureau, Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources, Sangju, Gyeongsangbuk-do 37242, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Dongdaemun, Seoul 02447, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-961-0946 Received: 2 June 2020; Accepted: 30 June 2020; Published: 4 July 2020 Abstract: Freshwater organisms are facing threats from various natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Using data sampled on a nationwide scale from streams in South Korea, we identified the crucial environmental factors influencing the distribution and abundance of freshwater gastropods. We used nonmetric multidimensional scaling and the random forest model to evaluate the relationships between environmental factors and gastropod assemblages. Among the 30 recorded species, two invasive gastropod species (Pomacea canaliculata and Physa acuta) have enlarged their distribution (10.4% and 57.3% frequency of occurrence, respectively), and were found to be widespread in streams and rivers. Our results revealed that the most influential factor in the distribution of gastropod assemblages was the ratio of cobble (%) in the substrate composition, although meteorological and physiographical factors were also important. However, the main environmental factors influencing species distribution varied among species according to habitat preference and environmental tolerance. Additionally, anthropogenic disturbance caused a decrease in the distribution of endemic species and an increase in the spatial distribution of invasive species. Finally, the results of the present study provide baseline information for planning successful strategies to maintain and conserve gastropod diversity when facing anthropogenic disturbance, as well as understanding the factors associated with the establishment of invasive species. -
Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)
ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment ICES CM 2004/ACME:05 Ref. E, G Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 25–26 March 2004 Cesenatico, Italy This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 OPENING OF THE MEETING AND INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE, ADOPTION OF AGENDA, SELECTION OF RAPPORTEUR .................................. 1 2.1 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Status of the terms of references ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Adoption of the Agenda.................................................................................................................................. 2 2.4 Selection of Rapporteur .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 REVIEW OF THE 2003 WGITMO REPORT........................................................................................................... 2 4 DISCUSSION PAPER OF THE EUROPEAN -
Patterns of Mekong Mollusc Biodiversity
water Article Patterns of Mekong Mollusc Biodiversity: Identification of Emerging Threats and Importance to Management and Livelihoods in a Region of Globally Significant Biodiversity and Endemism Ratha Sor 1,2,3,* , Peng Bun Ngor 3,4 , Pieter Boets 5,6 , Peter L. M. Goethals 5, Sovan Lek 7, Zeb S. Hogan 3,8 and Young-Seuk Park 9 1 Graduate School, Chea Sim University of Kamchaymear, No. 157, Preah Norodom Blvd, Khan Chamkarmon, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia 2 Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Russian Boulevard, Phnom Penh 12000, Cambodia 3 Wonders of the Mekong Project, c/o IFReD, No. 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., Khan Chamcar Morn, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia; [email protected] (P.B.N.); [email protected] (Z.S.H.) 4 Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute (IFReDI), Fisheries Administration, No. 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., Khan Chamkar Morn, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia 5 Aquatic Ecology Research Group, Ghent University, Campus Coupure Building F, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (P.L.M.G.) 6 Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Godshuizenlaan 95, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 7 SEVAB Doctoral School, Laboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique, Université Paul Sabatier—Toulouse III, UMR 5174, 118 route de Narbonne, CEDEX 4, 31062 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 8 Global Water Center & Department of Biology, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA 9 Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 August 2020; Accepted: 11 September 2020; Published: 18 September 2020 Abstract: The Lower Mekong Basin (LMB) is a key biodiversity hotspot. -
Systematic Revision of Palaeocene Brackish Water Gastropoda from Mons, Belgium, Based on Their Early Ontogenetic Shells
BULLETIN DE L’INSTITUT ROYAL DES SCIENCES NATURELLES DE BELGIQUE SCIENCES DE LA TERRE. 72: 111-134, 2002 BULLETIN VAN HET KONINKLIJK BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR NATUURWETENSCHAPPEN AARDWETENSCHAPPEN, 72: 111-134, 2002 Systematic revision of Palaeocene brackish water Gastropoda from Mons, Belgium, based on their early ontogenetic shells by Thorsten KOWALKE Kowalke, T.. 2002. - Systematic revision of Palaeocene brackish Introduction water Gastropoda from Mons, Belgium, based on their early ontoge netic shells. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, 72: 111-134, 4 pis., Bruxelles-Brussel, The Early Mid-Palaeocene sediments of Mons, Southeast March 31, 2002. - ISSN 0374-6291 Belgium, were brought to the attention of geologists, when the mining engineers F.L. Cornet and A. Briart recognised a section within a domestic well on the Gof- fint property in 1865. In 1874, the Geological Society of Abstract France initiated a second pit a few metres to the west on The systematic position of Early Mid-Palaeocene brackish water Gas the Coppée estate. These original sinkings were termi tropoda from the Dano-Montian of Mons, South-east Belgium, is nated at a depth of about 20 m, when the ground water revised. Representatives of the subclasses Neritimorpha (with the floor was reached. In 1969 another boring was initiated new genus Monsneritina- Neritoidea, Neritidae), Caenogastropoda (with the new genus Monspotamides - Cerithioidea, Potamididae) by the Belgian Geological Survey, located 10 m south of and Heterostropha are characterised with regard to their paleoecology. the Gofflnt pit. The sections - detailed descriptions of the Three different modes of early ontogenetic development are recognised stratigraphy and sketches of the locality were given by and paleoecological inferences are discussed. -
A Primer to Freshwater Gastropod Identification
Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society Freshwater Gastropod Identification Workshop “Showing your Shells” A Primer to Freshwater Gastropod Identification Editors Kathryn E. Perez, Stephanie A. Clark and Charles Lydeard University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 15-18 March 2004 Acknowledgments We must begin by acknowledging Dr. Jack Burch of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan. The vast majority of the information contained within this workbook is directly attributed to his extraordinary contributions in malacology spanning nearly a half century. His exceptional breadth of knowledge of mollusks has enabled him to synthesize and provide priceless volumes of not only freshwater, but terrestrial mollusks, as well. A feat few, if any malacologist could accomplish today. Dr. Burch is also very generous with his time and work. Shell images Shell images unless otherwise noted are drawn primarily from Burch’s forthcoming volume North American Freshwater Snails and are copyright protected (©Society for Experimental & Descriptive Malacology). 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................2 Shell images....................................................................................................................2 Table of Contents............................................................................................................3 General anatomy and terms .............................................................................................4 -
The Establishment of Macrobenthic Faunal Communities in Planted Mangroves of Increasing Age
Bachelor Thesis TVVR-17/4001 The Establishment of Macrobenthic Faunal Communities in Planted Mangroves of Increasing Age Minor Field Study ___________________________________________________ Simon Jacobsen Ellerstrand Division of Water Resources Engineering Department of Building and Environmental Technology Lund University The Establishment of Macrobenthic Faunal Communities in Planted Mangroves of Increasing Age Minor Field Study By: Simon Jacobsen Ellerstrand Bachelor Thesis Division of Water Resources Engineering Department of Building & Environmental Technology Lund University Box 118 221 00 Lund, Sweden Water Resources Engineering TVVR-17/4001 ISSN 1101-9824 Lund 2017 www.tvrl.lth.se Bachelor Thesis Division of Water Resources Engineering Department of Building & Environmental Technology Lund University Swedish title: Etableringen av makrobentiska faunasamhällen i planterade mangroveskogar av ökande ålder English title: The Establishment of Macrobenthic Faunal Communities in Planted Mangroves of Increasing Age Author: Simon Jacobsen Ellerstrand Supervisors: Linus Zhang Hongyou Hu Examiner: Magnus Persson Language: English Year: 2017 Keywords: Benthos, Shannon-diversity, forestation, biodiversity, ecosystem engineers, development issues i ii Minor Field Studies iii iv Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Linus Zhang at LTH, Lund University and Hongyou Hu at Xiamen University for accepting me as their student and making this study possible. I would also like to thank Lizhe Cai at Xiamen University for his support and knowledge about benthic fauna, and Jessica Abbott and Per Carlsson at Lund University for discussing the statistical analyses with me. I would like to thank the students of professor Hu and professor Cai for their support, knowledge and friendship during our stay in China, and especially Rao Yiyong for helping me with the identification of macrobenthic fauna.