DOCSLIB.ORG

Dixie National Forest Location

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dixie National Forest Location !(21 ¨¦§70 (!257 K Koosharem !(62 !(72 £¤89 !(21 !(24 ¨¦§15 Marysvale Milford Loa Lyman Capitol Reef Bicknell National UTAH NEVADA !(21 !(24 Park Torrey Beaver !(21 (!153 (!153 Junction Minersville !(12 !(62 Kingston !(62 (!130 Circleville Fremont River Ranger District £¤89 Antimony (Administered by Fishlake National Forest) ¨¦§15 !(20 Escalante Ranger District Boulder Box Death-Hollow Paragonah Powell Wilderness Ranger District !(12 (!130 Parowan Panguitch !(56 £¤89 Enoch 143 143 (! (! !(12 Escalante ¨¦§15 Pine Lake Cedar City Brian Head Panguitch Lake !(12 !(14 !(18 !(56 Cedar Ashdown Hatch Gorge Breaks Glen Canyon WildernessNational Cedar City Tropic National Monument Bryce Ranger District Recreation Area Enterprise Tropic Reservoir Canyon National !(12 Park Cannonville Henrieville Enterprise Reservoir Kanarraville Navajo Lake Pine Valley New Harmony !(14 Ranger District ¨¦§15 s £¤89 s e n r Alton e d l i W in ta n u o M Grand Staircase-Escalante y le al V National Monument ne Pi Glendale Zion National Park Orderville !(9 £¤89 !(18 Leeds La Verkin !(9 Ivins Virgin Glen Canyon £¤59 Santa Clara Hurricane National Recreation Rockville Washington Area £¤89 ¨¦§15 St. George £¤89 £¤89 £¤59 Big Water ¨¦§84 Legend Oil & Gas Leasing EIS on Lands Administered Original data was compiled from multiple source Cities National Forest System Lands Other Land Administration data and may not meet the U.S. National Mapping 80 by the Dixie National Forest ¨¦§ ¨¦§215 £¤40 Accuracy Standard of the Office of Management £¤189 Minor Roads* Dixie National Forest Private and Budget. For specific dates and/or additional digital information, contact the Forest Supervisor, Dixie National Forest, Cedar City, Utah. This map Highways Fishlake National Forest Bureau of Land Management has no warranties to its contents or accuracy. THIS Dixie National Forest MAP IS A PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR SCOPING ¨¦§70 Interstates NFS Wilderness Areas National Park Service PURPOSES ONLY. Location Map Water Bodies State of Utah ¨¦§15 State Boundaries Tribal Miles Prepared by JBR Environmental Consultants Horizontal Datum = NAD 83 0 4 8 12 16 5 January 2007 1:240,000 *Not all roads are shown. Only some roads are depicted for orientation purposes. Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument** Coordinate System = Zone 12N **Managed by the Bureau of Land Management. Koosharem K Marysvale Milford Loa Lyman Bicknell UTAH NEVADA Torrey Beaver Minersville Junction Kingston Circleville Antimony ¤£130 £¤20 Escalante Ranger District Boulder Paragonah Powell Ranger District Parowan Panguitch £¤89 Enoch Cedar City Escalante Ranger District £¤12 Cedar City Brian Head ¤£143 £¤56 Hatch ¨¦§15 Tropic Enterprise Cannonville Henrieville Pine Valley Kanarraville Ranger District £¤14 New Harmony £¤18 Alton Glendale Orderville Leeds £¤9 La Verkin Ivins Virgin Santa Clara Hurricane Rockville Washington £¤59 St. George Big Water Kanab ¨¦§84 Legend Miles DIXIE OIL & GAS EIS 0 7.5 15 22.5 30 Cities Plays on Dixie National Forest (2) Coalbed Gas Plays 80 ¨¦§ ¨¦§215 £¤40 Major Roads Cretaceous conventional play Emery Sandstone Member play (1) Excludes Fremont Ranger District (administered by Fishlake £¤189 National Forest). Oil & Gas Plays and Freeways Permo-Triassic oil and gas play Dakota Formation play (2) From Utah Geological Survey Report: The Oil, Gas, Coalbed John Henry Member play Gas, Carbon Dioxide, and Geothermal Resources of the Dixie Carbon Dioxide Plays State Boundaries Proterozoic/Cambrian oil & gas play National Forest, Southwestern Utah. April 2004. ¨¦§70 (3) Includes Devonian-Pennsylvanian, Proterozoic/Cambrian, Dixie National Forest (1) Carbon dioxide play (3) Ferron Sandstone Member play and Permo-Triassic carbon dioxide plays. Devonian-Pennsylvanian plays Dixie National Forest Original data was compiled from multiple source data and may not meet the U.S. National ¨¦§15 Basin and Range Dev.-Penn. oil and gas play Mapping Accuracy Standard of the Office of Management and Budget. For specific dates Prepared by JBR Environmental Consultants Horizontal Datum = NAD 83 and/or additional digital information, contact the Forest Supervisor, Dixie National Forest, 1:230,000 Paradox Basin Dev.-Penn. oil & gas play Cedar City, Utah. This map has no warranties to its contents or accuracy. 4 December 2006 Coordinate System = Zone 12N THIS MAP IS A PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR SCOPING PURPOSES ONLY. Oil and Gas Occurrence Potential November 1, 2006 Milford Loa Beaver 15 Piute Wayne 89 Nevada Iron Panguitch Garfield Escalante Cedar City 15 Washington Kane 89 St. George Kanab San Juan Arizona BLM Wilderness Map - 3 Low Potential / Low Certainty Indian Reservation High Potential / Low Certainty National Forest Wilderness No warranty is made by the BLM for Moderate Potential / Low Certainty use of the data for purposes not intended National Forest by the BLM. 0 5 10 20 Miles This product may not meet BLM National Park standards for accuracy and content. Different data sources and input scales 0 10 20 Kilometers may cause some misalignment of data layers. Authorized Oil and Gas Leases November 1, 2006 Milford Loa Beaver 15 Piute Wayne 89 Nevada Iron Panguitch Garfield Escalante Cedar City 15 Washington Kane 89 St. George Kanab San Juan Arizona Map - 4 National Park BLM Wilderness No warranty is made by the BLM for Authorized Oil and Gas Leases use of the data for purposes not intended by the BLM. 0 5 10 20 Miles Indian Reservation This product may not meet BLM National Forest Wilderness standards for accuracy and content. Different data sources and input scales 0 10 20 Kilometers National Forest may cause some misalignment of data layers. DNF Lands Nominated for Oil & Gas Lease Sales 2005 - 2006 November 1, 2006 Milford Loa Beaver 15 Piute Wayne 89 Nevada Iron Panguitch Garfield Escalante Cedar City 15 Washington Kane 89 St. George Kanab San Juan Arizona BLM Wilderness Map - 5 Indian Reservation National Forest Wilderness No warranty is made by the BLM for use of the data for purposes not intended National Forest by the BLM. 0 5 10 20 Miles This product may not meet BLM National Park standards for accuracy and content. Different data sources and input scales 0 10 20 Kilometers Townships Where Lands Were Nominated may cause some misalignment of data layers. Oil and Gas Development Potential November 1, 2006 Milford Loa Beaver 15 Piute Wayne 89 Nevada Iron Panguitch Garfield Escalante Cedar City 15 Washington Kane 89 St. George Kanab San Juan Arizona BLM Wilderness Map - 6 High Potential Indian Reservation Moderate Potential National Forest Wilderness No warranty is made by the BLM for Low Potential use of the data for purposes not intended National Forest by the BLM. 0 5 10 20 Miles This product may not meet BLM National Park standards for accuracy and content. Different data sources and input scales 0 10 20 Kilometers may cause some misalignment of data layers..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fishlake National Forest
    FISHLAKE NATIONAL FOREST RESPONSE TO COMMENTS for the FISHLAKE OHV ROUTE DESIGNATION PROJECT 12 October 2006 INTRODUCTION The forest incorporated existing comments from prior public participation processes during the pre- NEPA (NFMA) assessment. The following documents from these efforts are incorporated by reference: Public comments received for the 2001 OHV Event Environmental Assessment for the Rocky Mountain and Fillmore Jamborees. The assessment covered all of the Fishlake and portions of the Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests as well as Richfield BLM. OHV and travel management comments received by mail or at public meetings for Forest Plan revision efforts. Meeting notes and final presentations and reports from the Forest Plan revision Topical Working Groups (TWiGs) for OHVs, dispersed camping, and undeveloped area suitability. These records are included in the OHV project file and are incorporated by reference. The Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Fishlake OHV Route Designation Project was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2004. The NOI included a proposed action (Alternative 2) that designated routes and areas open to motorized use on the Fishlake National Forest. The effect of these designations is to close the forest to unrestricted motorized cross-country travel. The NOI asked for comments on the proposed action by July 30, 2004. Immediately prior to release of the NOI, the Forest Service briefed local governmental officials, motorized advocacy groups, businesses, and environmental groups. The project web site http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/fishlake/projects/ohv.shtml, press release, and postings at some trailheads were used to disseminate information and gather comments.
    [Show full text]
  • USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020
    USDA Forest Service Guidelines for Consultants for Identifying, Recording, & Evaluating Archaeological Resources in UTAH April 20, 2020 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & CONTACTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 4 Policy ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Professional Qualifications ....................................................................................................................... 4 Bids ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Permits for Archaeological Investigations ................................................................................................ 5 Project Numbers ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Site Numbers ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Discoveries ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Confidentiality ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE USDA FOREST SERVICE ● Intermountain Region 324 25th STREET OGDEN, UTAH 84401 ● Web: http://www.fs.fed.us/r4 Release No. R4-1201 Contact: Erin O’Connor 801-625-5347 Mitch Snow 202-912-7368 National Forests Added and Comment Period Formally Extended on Planning for Sage Grouse Conservation Measures In cooperation with the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management will issue a corrected Notice of Intent to address sage-grouse in 10 additional National Forest System Lands and Resource Management Plans and formally extended the comment period through March 23, 2012. The notice will appear in the February 10, 2012 Federal Register. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) are seeking public comment on issues that should be addressed in Environmental Impact Statements (EIS’s) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS’s) that will evaluate and provide greater sage-grouse conservation measures in land use plans in 10 Western states. This notice continues public comment on the scoping process for the EISs/SEISs through March 23, 2012. The EIS’s/SEIS’s will be coordinated under two regions: The Rocky Mountain Region, previously designated as the Eastern Region, which includes land use plans in the states of Colorado, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota and portions of Utah and Montana; and the Great Basin Region, previously designated as the Western Region, which includes land use plans in northeastern California, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, and portions of Utah and Montana. Within the Rocky Mountain Region, the potentially affected National Forest System Land Management Plans include: Colorado’s Routt National Forest Wyoming’s Thunder Basin National Grassland, Medicine Bow National Forest and the Bridger-Tetons National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Outreach Announcement
    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 Wildlife Biologist GS-0486-11 Dixie National Forest Fishlake National Forest Uinta/Wasatch Cache National Forest Supervisors Office Supervisors Office Supervisors Office 1789 N Wedgewod Lane 115 E 900 N 857 W South Jordan Parkway Cedar City, UT 84721 Richfield, UT 84701 South Jordan, UT 84095 (435) 865-3700 (435) 896-9233 (801) 999-2103 A vacancy announcement to fill a GS-0486-11 Wildlife Biologist term not to exceed 4 year position will be posted on the USAJOBS web site, http://www.usajobs.gov in the near future. This is a term position opportunity not to exceed one year, with the possibility of extension of up to four years depending on funding and availability of work. At the end of the term, the incumbent will be terminated. This notification is being circulated to inform prospective applicants of this opportunity. If interested please respond no later than September 27th. You may also obtain a copy of the announcement after the position has been advertised by contacting Julie Whicker – Administrative Support Assistant at (435) 865-3716 or e-mail [email protected]. Description of duties… Incumbent is responsible for wildlife program management, policy and planning, inspection and evaluation of wildlife, and conducting and reviewing wildlife surveys and studies. In addition to the above duties the incumbent serves as a key member of the Forest Service Interdisciplinary Team working on three major electrical transmission line projects across Utah National Forests. Position must be able to build relationships with remote Interdisciplinary colleagues within the Forest Service, other agencies, and private sector environmental consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2021 to 09/30/2021 Ashley National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, On Hold N/A N/A Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders 907-586-7886 EIS [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 07/01/2021 07:16 pm MT Page 1 of 10 Ashley National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:12/2020 01/2021 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest Visitor Guide
    ishlake National Forest F VISITOR GUIDE Blazing the Trail Fish Lake surrounded by fall colors Craggy cliff in the Tushar Mountains Beehive Peak area ising as an oasis in central Utah, the mountains and plateaus of the Fishlake National Forest offer What’s Inside an accessible landscape for anyone with a sense of R Get to Know Us ................. 2 adventure. Fish Lake, from which the forest takes Special Places ...................... 3 its name, is considered by many to be the gem of Scenic Byways ..................... 4 Utah. Many other scenic spots reveal secrets and Activities ............................... 4 stories of past settlements and civilizations. Map ......................................... 6 Campgrounds ..................... 8 Routes and Trails ....................................... 9 Fast Forest Facts trails on Know Before You Go.......10 the forest— Contact Information .......12 Elevation Range: 4,760’–12,174’ such as Acres: 1.5 million the nationally known Paiute ATV Trail system—are a means to access Miles of Designated Motorized Routes: 2,182 miles of roads and opportunities such as hunting, fishing, 655 miles of motorized trails and wildlife viewing. Camping is also popular, but if you’d rather drive a Amazing Features: An aspen stand near Fish Lake is considered scenic byway or hike a trail the most massive living organism in solitude, we have those on earth opportunities as well. Come see for yourself! This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Fishlake National Forest experience. G et to Know Us © Kapu History he resources of the Fishlake National Forest in central UtahT are vital to surrounding communities, a point not lost on President McKinley who reserved the first unit of the forest in 1899.
    [Show full text]
  • SOPA) 04/01/2019 to 06/30/2019 Dixie National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2019 to 06/30/2019 Dixie National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:01/2019 02/2019 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants NOI in Federal Register 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 11/21/2017 [email protected] EIS Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 06/2018 Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015. This project is in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Land Management. Web Link: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r4/home/?cid=stelprd3843381 Location: UNIT - Ashley National Forest All Units, Boise National Forest All Units, Bridger-Teton National Forest All Units, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest All Units, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest All Units, Dixie National Forest All Units, Fishlake National Forest All Units, Salmon-Challis National Forest All Units, Sawtooth National Forest All Units, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest All Units, Manti-La Sal National Forest All Units, Caribou- Targhee National Forest All Units, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache All Units. STATE - Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishlake National Forest Recreation Fee Highlights, 2016
    United States Department of Agriculture Sawtooth National Forest Credit to Tony Baril 2015 Share the Experience Fishlake National Forest Recreation Fee Program Accomplishment Highlights 2016 Great Gates Helping Us See When you gotta go at night in a remote setting, New gate at having a little light to show the way can make a big Gooseberry difference. The night lights at the Gooseberry Administrative Campground restrooms are powered by solar site. panels. The Forest constructed a new steel sided box to protect the solar batteries that provide night lights for the restrooms. Cabins and the campground at Gooseberry are located just 18 miles from Salina, Utah. The Steel box to historic cabin structures were used as summer protect solar headquarters from 1907 to 1960. Today, the site is batteries. used for family reunions, group events, scout and church groups and youth camps. The Forest installed a new walk-through pass gate at the site, and shorted and repaired the existing road gate. In addition the replaced and painted the entrance fencing. Improving Reception The Forest purchased a new lawn mower, clothes washer, dryer and cell phone booster. These Recreation Fee Dollars items will enable better maintenance and use of Recreation fee dollars are an investment in outdoor facilities at and around Gooseberry administrative recreation. They support and enhance: site. • Public safety • Recreation site maintenance and improvements • Educational experiences Cell phones have • Informational wayside exhibits better reception at • Youth programs and partnerships Gooseberry • Interpretive programs Current and future generations benefit as 80-95% of the funds are reinvested in the facilities and services that visitors enjoy, use, and value.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2020 to 06/30/2020 Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations will be applicable to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the United States Mining Law. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 04/01/2020 04:07 am MT Page 1 of 14 Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:07/2020 07/2020 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues *UPDATED* arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an Evaluation of Population and Habitat Trends Version 3.0 2010
    Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an evaluation of population and habitat trends Version 3.0 2010 Isolated aspen stand. Photo by Heather McRae. Pygmy nuthatch. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Pumpkin Fire, Kaibab National Forest Mule deer. Photo by Bill Noble Red-naped sapsucker. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Northern Goshawk © Tom Munson Tree encroachment, Kaibab National Forest Prepared by: Valerie Stein Foster¹, Bill Noble², Kristin Bratland¹, and Roger Joos³ ¹Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest Supervisor’s Office ²Forest Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Supervisor’s Office ³Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Williams Ranger District Table of Contents 1. MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES ................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................................... 8 Management Indicator Species Population Estimates ...................................................... 10 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ................................................................................................ 18 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ...................................................................................... 18 Cinnamon Teal .......................................................................................................... 21 Northern Goshawk ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 Thru FY2016
    Agency Administrator Workshop Participants FY2014 thru FY2016 Benson Teresa FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Briscoe Caren FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Carlson Ann FS Lassen National Forest FY14 Christiansen Donn FS Cleveland National Forest FY14 Donald Michael FS Plumas National Forest FY14 Ewing Rebecca FS Mark Twain National Forest FY14 Gosse Michael FS Ocala National Forest FY14 Herrera Macario FS Allegheny National Forest FY14 Hutchins Michael FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Jackson William FS Green Mountain National Forest FY14 Kelley Keith FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Maercklein Mary FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 McCombs Matthew FS Pisgah National Forest FY14 McCoy Jim FS Ozark-St. Francis National Forest FY14 Morgan Leslie FS National Forests in Mississippi FY14 Morris JaSal FS Cherokee National Forest FY14 Moynihan Megan FS Ouachita National Forest FY14 Napper Carolyn FS Shasta-Trinity National Forest FY14 Nedlo Jason FS Daniel Boone National Forest FY14 Pentecost Mark FS Superior National Forest FY14 Petersen Brittany FWS Bon Secour NWR FY14 Russell Scott FS Coconino National Forest FY14 Schroyer Karen FS Dixie National Forest FY14 Shinn Jeffrey FS Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests FY14 Skustad Carl FS Superior National Forest FY14 Steele Kurtis FS Superior National Forest FY14 Stresser Susan FS Shoshone National Forest FY14 Walker Erick FS Idaho Panhandle National Forest FY14 Watson Alfred FS Sequoia National Forest FY14 Yoshina Dean FS Olympic National Forest FY14 Alfred Roderick FS Inyo National
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2021 to 03/31/2021 Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 09/13/2018 [email protected] EIS Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) 01/01/2021 04:05 am MT Page 1 of 9 Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Amendments to Land - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:12/2020 01/2021 John Shivik Management Plans Regarding - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Objection Period Legal Notice 801-625-5667 Sage-grouse Conservation 08/02/2019 [email protected] EIS Description: The Forest Service is considering amending its land management plans to address new and evolving issues *UPDATED* arising since implementing sage-grouse plans in 2015.
    [Show full text]