DOCSLIB.ORG

Forty Years of Community-Based Forestry. a Review of Its Extent And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forty Years of Community-Based Forestry. a Review of Its Extent And 176 176 FAO FORESTRY PAPER Forty years of Forty years of community-based forestry community-based forestry Forty years of community-based forestry – A review its extent and effectiveness A review of its extent and effectiveness A review of its extent and effectiveness Since the 1970s and 1980s, community-based forestry has grown in popularity, based on the concept that local communities, when granted sufcient property rights over local forest commons, can organize autonomously and develop local institutions to regulate the use of natural resources and manage them sustainably. Over time, various forms of community-based forestry have evolved in different countries, but all have at their heart the notion of some level of participation by smallholders and community groups in planning and implementation. This publication is FAO’s rst comprehensive look at the impact of community-based forestry since previous reviews in 1991 and 2001. It considers both collaborative regimes (forestry practised on land with formal communal tenure requiring collective action) and smallholder forestry (on land that is generally privately owned). The publication examines the extent of community-based forestry globally and regionally and assesses its effectiveness in delivering on key biophysical and socioeconomic outcomes, i.e. moving towards sustainable forest management and improving local livelihoods. The report is targeted at policy-makers, practitioners, researchers, communities and civil society. ISSN 0258-6150 ISBN 978-92-5-109095-4 ISSN 0258-6150 FAO FORESTRY FAO FAO 9 789251 090954 PAPER I5415E/1/02.16 176 Cover-II.pdf 1 15/02/2016 14:09 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Cover photo: Forest User Group members participate in a thinning exercise in their larch forest, Mongolia (© Damdinsuren Enkhsaikhan) FAO FORESTRY Forty years of PAPER community-based forestry 176 A review of its extent and effectiveness Don Gilmour FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109095-4 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. iii Contents Foreword vii Acknowledgements viii Acronyms ix Executive summary x 1. Introduction 1 What is community-based forestry? 1 Rationale, purpose and scope of the publication 2 2. Historical overview of the emergence and evolution of CBF 5 Why CBF became popular 6 Institutional response 7 Evolution of CBF in brief 8 3. Types of CBF 13 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information Categorizing CBF regimes 13 product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal A word on informal CBF regimes 16 or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or CBF objectives 17 concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference 4. Extent of CBF 21 to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Extent of CBF by region 21 Global extent of CBF 33 The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. Summary 35 ISBN 978-92-5-109095-4 5. Current trends in CBF 37 © FAO, 2016 Institutionalization of CBF into national development programmes in developing countries 37 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information Emergence of civil society organizations to represent CBF interests 38 product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial Restitution and privatization of forest land 41 products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source Expansion of smallholder forestry, particularly in Asia 43 and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. Commercialization of CBF products 45 Connections between smallholders/communities All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial and private companies 51 use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. 6. Effectiveness of CBF 55 FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) Changes in natural capital 56 and can be purchased through [email protected]. Changes in social and human capital 59 iv Changes in financial capital 62 Equity and poverty alleviation 64 Ability of CBF to enhance resilience and reduce vulnerability to shocks 68 Overall, has CBF been effective? 70 Summary 73 7. Lessons learned from analysis of CBF experiences 77 Some recent analyses 77 Requirements for effective CBF 79 Considerations for implementation of CBF 89 8. CBF in the international arena 93 Incorporation of CBF into international frameworks 93 Implications of contemporary global policy initiatives for CBF 93 Large-scale land acquisitions in the global South 103 Major CBF initiatives and opportunities for regional cooperation 104 9. Issues for the future 107 Application of existing knowledge to improve CBF outcomes 107 Recognition of tenure rights of local and indigenous communities 107 Commercialization of CBF goods and services 108 Recognition of CBF limitations 108 Data on extent and effectiveness of CBF regimes 108 Research 109 10. Conclusions 111 References 113 Appendixes 131 Appendix 1. Ten key publications on CBF 133 Appendix 2. Spectrum of generic types of CBF based on level of rights, responsibilities and empowerment 134 Appendix 3. Factors that contribute to success of CBF regimes and policy guidance for their successful adoption 137 Appendix 4. Research issues and questions emerging from the CBF review 139 v Tables 1 Key global forest-related developments that have influenced the evolution of CBF 6 2 CBF objectives reported by numerous reviewers 18 3 Extent of CBF in Africa 22 4 Extent of CBF in Asia and the Pacific 26 5 Extent of CBF in Latin America 29 6 Estimates of area of forest owned by, or with management rights held by, communities and/or indigenous peoples 33 7 Forest tenure in 52 countries 33 8 Change of ownership of production forests in China 42 9 Changes in area and ownership patterns of Acacia smallholder plantations in Viet Nam between 2002 and 2012 44 10 Typology of forestry community−company relationships 51 11 Summary of effectiveness of CBF assessed by a range of reviewers 70 Figures 1 Spectrum of CBF regimes 15 2 Area of forest under CBF regimes, by region 34 3 Keys to effective community based forestry (CBF) 80 Boxes 1 Definition of community-based forestry used in this publication 2 2 Key issues and challenges identified in previous FAO reviews of CBF 9 3 Results from a study of forest tenure regimes in 30 of the world’s most forested countries 14 4 Possibility of community concessions in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 23 5 Recent CBF initiatives in Africa 24 6 Differences in tenure rights and management outcomes of selected CBF regimes across Asia and the Pacific 27 7 Different types of CBF regimes across Latin America 28 8 Federation of Community Forestry Users Nepal: a civil society organization with a mandate to influence policy and governance practices associated with CBF 39 9 Confederation of European Forest Owners – the umbrella federation of national forest owners’ organizations in Europe 40 10 Smallholder forestry in Ciamis District, West Java, Indonesia 45 vi 11 Examples of some key constraints applying to the commercialization of products from CBF 49 12 Factors that promote effective community−company relationships in Latin America 52 13 Livelihoods − more than subsistence goods and services 55 14 Case studies or metadata analyses? Trade-offs and complementarities in assessing CBF effectiveness 56 15 A definition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Importance and Uses of Forest Product Bamboo and Rattan: Their Value to Socioeconomics of Local Communities
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 8 , No. 12, Dec, 2018, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2018 HRMARS Importance and Uses of Forest Product Bamboo and Rattan: their Value to Socioeconomics of Local Communities Wan Rafiekal Wan Abdul Rahim & Roszehan Mohd Idrus To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5252 DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5252 Received: 16 Nov 2018, Revised: 20 Dec 2018, Accepted: 24 Dec 2018 Published Online: 09 Jan 2019 In-Text Citation: (Rahim & Idrus, 2018) To Cite this Article: Rahim, W. R. W. A., & Idrus, R. M. (2018). Importance and Uses of Forest Product Bamboo and Rattan: their Value to Socioeconomics of Local Communities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1484–1497. Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com) This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode Vol. 8, No. 12, 2018, Pg. 1484 - 1497 http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS JOURNAL HOMEPAGE Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/publication-ethics 1484 International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameroon & Community Forestry in the Congo Basin
    Cameroon & Community Forestry in the Congo Basin Project Outline Introduction: Rainforest Alliance & Community Forestry Since 1987, the Rainforest Alliance has pioneered an innovative approach to solving environmental crises by advocating for the implementation of sustainable management practices that conserve biodiversity and improve livelihoods. We work up and down the supply chain, from indigenous communities to multilateral corporations, to deliver the tools and information necessary to mitigate climate change, empower communities, and prevent deforestation. However, the last few years have seen a sharp increase in threats to forests, especially from the establishment of large-scale agricultural and mining operations. Land grabbing by multinational companies – abetted by government agencies – in forest areas under ancestral tenure is quickly destroying large areas of forest in the conversion to monocrop plantations producing rubber and oil palm. Such development has been widely documented as severely undermining local livelihoods and biodiversity. In the face of mounting threats a promising alternative is emerging. Year to year, globally across the tropics, increased responsibility over natural forest areas is being given to local communities. Evidence from across Latin America – where the Rainforest Alliance has been working for 15 years to support community forestry shows clearly that community-managed forests can outperform strictly protected areas in maintaining forest cover, while providing economic development opportunities for marginalized groups. For example, a recent analysis of the Maya Biosphere of Guatemala showed that community-managed forests had deforestation rates close to zero, whereas adjacent protected areas experienced forest conversion above regional averages. While in Africa this approach is still in its nascent stages, the country of Cameroon offers significant hope for demonstrating the potential of community forestry to save the Congo Basin’s forests and empower locally- owned enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Impact: Lessons Learned from the Forest, Climate And
    MEASURING IMPACT Lessons Learned from the Forest, Climate and Communities Alliance PREPARED FOR THE BUREAU FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT/OFFICE OF FORESTRY AND BIODIVERSITY July 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. FCICAt was LESSONS prepared LEARNED by Environmental Incentives, LLC, Foundations of Success and ICF International. 1 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. MEASURING IMPACT CONTRACT INFORMATION This program is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of its requisition number REQ- EGAT-12-000014 (Measuring Impact) implemented by prime recipients Environmental Incentives, LLC, Foundations of Success and ICF International. The Measuring Impact project has been issued under contract number AID-OAA-C-12-00078 and supports the same program objectives as described in RFP number SOL-OAA-000050. The Measuring Impact project is funded and managed by the USAID Office of Forestry and Biodiversity, and Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and the Environment. PREPARED BY Judy Boshoven, Foundations of Success CONTRIBUTIONS BY Benjamin Hodgdon, Rainforest Alliance Olaf Zerbock, USAID SUBMITTED BY Elizabeth Lauck, Environmental Incentives, LLC SUBMITTED TO Rebecca Butterfield, Contracting Officer Representative Office of Forestry and Biodiversity/Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and the Environment United States Agency for International Development FOR MORE INFORMATION Environmental Incentives, LLC 1606 20th Street NW Washington, DC 20009 Tel: 202.525.2450 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.enviroincentives.com DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agroforestry
    Second Wednesdays | 1:00 – 2:15 pm ET www.fs.fed.us/research/urban-webinars USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. COMMUNITY FOOD FORESTS: FRUITFUL AND FIRE-SMART Catherine Bukowski Ann Audrey Researcher & Consultant Chair Virginia Tech & Linking Edible Arizona Forests (LEAF) communityfoodforests.com Network [email protected] [email protected] Community Food Forests Catherine Bukowski, PhD Candidate, Virginia Tech [email protected] Committee: John Munsell- Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation & Forest Management Extension Specialist Paul Kelsch- Department of Landscape Architecture Kim Niewolny- Department of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Jim Chamberlain- Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service Community Food Forest Research Sites Visited During 2014-2015 Sites are mapped over EPA Level II Ecoregions of North America. Ecoregions are areas where ecosystems are typically similar- they are useful for structuring and implementing ecosystem management strategies across organizations. https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregions 2013 As of 2018, over 75 urban food forestry projects have been found through online searches or word of mouth. What is a community food forest? A place where people come together to collaboratively grow food using an ecologically designed system based on structural and functional patterns found in forest ecosystems. Community Food Forest Public food commons Multifunctional green infrastructure Beacon Food Forest, Seattle, WA (2009) AGROFORESTRY- A land use management system that intentionally integrates trees with agricultural crops and/or livestock to create economically viable and environmentally sustainable food production. PERMACULTURE- Philosophy + and Design Approach based on whole-systems thinking and ecological patterns and observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests and Forestry Research in India
    SINGHAL, KUMAR AND JEEVA 55 Tropical Ecology 44(1): 55-61, 2003 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology Forests and forestry research in India R.M. SINGHAL1, SUDHIR KUMAR2 & V. JEEVA2 133, Sewak Ashram Road, Dehra Dun - 248 001; 2Directorate of Research, Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, P.O. New Forest, Dehra Dun – 248006 Abstract: This paper in general way deals with problems and prospects of forestry in In- dia. Stressing upon the need for linking the biophysical dimensions of the problem with the so- cial, the paper sets the agenda for an action plan in forestry for the country. Resumen: Este artículo trata de manera general los problemas y las perspectivas de la forestería en la India. Haciendo énfasis en la necesidad de relacionar las dimensiones biofísicas y sociales del problema, el trabajo establece la agenda para un plan de acción en la forestería del país. Resumo: Este artigo aborda, de um forma geral, os problemas e prospectos da silvicultura na Índia. Acentuando a necessidade de ligação da dimensão biofisica do problema com a dimen- são social, este artigo fixa a agenda para um plano de acção da silvicultura para o país. Key words: Forestry, policy, resources, research strategy, status. Introduction Our forests have been transformed drastically and radically, and find it is hard to any undistrib- In view of the deteriorating forest resources uted forests as created by Mother Nature. In the and their importance to the national economy and present system, forests are unable to provide an environment, the Government has been emphasiz- intrinsic protection, the production of multiple ing for the sustainable development of forest re- products or environmental and human functions.
    [Show full text]
  • APFSOS/WP/25 Technology Scenarios in the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector
    Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 4 ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY SECTOR OUTLOOK STUDY WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper No: APFSOS/WP/25 TECHNOLOGY SCENARIOS IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY SECTOR Study contributed by Forestry Research Support Programme for Asia and the Pacific (FORSPA) and prepared by Thomas Enters Forestry Policy and Planning Division, Rome Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok October 1997 Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 25 Technology Scenarios in the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Forestry Research Support Programme for Asia and the Pacific The Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study is being undertaken under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission. This report comes under Workplan Number E27.1. Technology Scenarios in the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 25 Technology Scenarios in the Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 25 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY According to recent assessments, the Asia-Pacific Region requires more wood than it can sustainably produce; this situation will become more marked in future. This raises the question of how the sector in the Region will react. The impending food shortage during the 1960s resulted in impressive developments in agriculture with the advances of the Green Revolution. Will we see similar advances and technological change in forestry? Significant changes have been made during the recent past. Rubberwood, formerly viewed as a waste product, is today a valuable raw material. The wood processing industry has developed reconstituted wood panels, thus reducing its dependence on large diameter timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Policies in the Near East Region: 111 Analysis and Synthesis
    ISSN 0256-6150 Forestry policies in the Near East region: 111 analysis and synthesis and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forestry policies in the Near East region: analysis and synthesis Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation. The de6lgnallons employed and the presentation of matertal In this publication do not Imply the expression of any opinion whalllOeVer on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any counlry, territory, city or area or of III authorltlel, or concerning the delimitation of III Irontlera or boundaries. M-36 ISBN 92-5-1 03382-X All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechani· cal, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction,should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme dl CaracaJla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1113 FORWARD .................................................. - I- 1) INTRODUCTION ......................................... - 3- 2) FORESTRY IN THE NEAR EAST REGION: A BACKGROUND ........... - 4 - 2.1. The Region ......................................... - 4- 2.2. ,Forest Resources in the Region. .. - 7 - 2.3. Forest Plantations . .. - 8 - 2.4. Place of Forestry in Near East Society ....................... - 10 - 2.5. Forest Protection and Conservation ......................... - 11 - 2.6. Forest Industries and Trade . .. - 12 - 2.7. Issues and Conflicts of the Forestry Sector. .. - 12 - 3) FOREST OWNERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION ................... - 15 - 3.1. Ownership and Tenure of Forest Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Opportunities and Challenges for Community Forestry: Lessons from Tropical America
    REGIONAL EXAMPLES OF FOREST RElatED CHALLENGES AND OPPortUNITIES 16 Opportunities and Challenges for Community forestry: Lessons from Tropical America Convening lead author: Wil de Jong Lead authors: Carlos Cornejo, Pablo Pacheco, Benno Pokorny and Dietmar Stoian Contributing authors: Cesar Sabogal and Bastiaan Louman Abstract: Community forestry is pursued as rural development strategy in many tropical forest regions worldwide. In Tropical America, rich experiences have been ac- cumulated with community forestry support initiatives and this chapter summarizes published and the author’s hands on experiences. The chapter is divided in two parts. The first half focuses on the actual contribution of forests and trees to rural livelihoods, evidence that allows a more precise identification of the actual potential of communal forestry for rural development. The second half of the chapter reviews some of the challenges faced by community forestry development initiatives. The chapter critically reflects on generating profits, inserting communities in forest product value-chains, setting up community forestry enterprises and the challenge to adequately deal with complex regulations. By exploring the experiences of a handful of current community forestry initiatives in Amazonia, and with some reference to Central America, the poten- tials, limitations and challenges of communal and smallholder forestry are discussed. Keywords: forest incomes, forest regulations, forest product value-chains, community forestry support initiatives, community forestry enterprises ■ 16.1 Introduction and anticipated fuelwood shortages, and mitigating undesired impacts of forest conversion on the en- The livelihoods of an estimated 300 million people vironment. worldwide living close to tropical forests depend on A review of the literature that deals with the tree or forest products for daily subsistence (Pimentel wide range of community forestry initiatives, also et al.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Pilot Community Forestry Project
    SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT SOUTH SUDAN PILOT COMMUNITY FORESTRY PROJECT PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISALS OF IFWOTO AND LAINYA PAYAMS PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISALS OF IFWOTO PARTICIPATORY RURALAND APPRAISALS LAINYA PAYAMS OF IFWOTO AND LAINYA PAYAMS [Cover photo] South Sudan[Cover photo] Pilot [Cover photo] Community Forestry September 2013 ProjectSeptember 2013 September 2013 Participatory Rural Appraisals of Ifwoto and Lainya Payams November 2013 Disclaimer No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UNEP. The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES..............................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................................................4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Community Based Forest Management in India BIODIVERSITY and ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304353253 Community Based Forest Management in India BIODIVERSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Chapter · January 2016 READS 31 All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Krishna Upadhaya letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 12 August 2016 Pages: 167-184 BIODIVERSITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Edited by: Dr. Krishna Upadhaya ISBN: 978-93-5056-775-3 Edition: 2016 Published by: Discovery Publishing House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (India) CHAPTER13 Community Based Forest Management in India Aabid Hussain Mir1 and Krishna Upadhaya2* ABSTRACT In India, forest and natural resource management have been practiced by local communities since time immemorial, but emerged into the consciousness of government and many donors in the late nineteenth century. Currently, community forests and forestry has taken central place in national politics because of their importance in rural livelihoods, environmental protection and state revenues. In order to promote and develop the sector various schemes and laws have been implemented from time to time, keeping in view the community as well as political 1 Department of Environmental Studies, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong - 793 022 (India). 2 Department of Basic Sciences and Social Sciences, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong - 793 022 (India). * Corresponding author email: [email protected] 168 Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation interests. Although most of the schemes have shown positive outcomes, failures were also a part. The present paper addresses the processes pertaining to the current status, people’s dependence and circumstances that led to the progression of community forestry in India, and reviews and analyses the rising policy issues in the current scenario confronting the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Meso-Level Facilitating Conditions in the Emergence of Community-Based Forest Management in Boudh District of Odisha
    Environment and Ecology Research 4(2): 50-62, 2016 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/eer.2016.040202 The Role of Meso-level Facilitating Conditions in the Emergence of Community-based Forest Management in Boudh District of Odisha Kanna K. Siripurapu1,*, Joshua Wayland1, Hemanta K. Sahoo2, Martha E. Geores3 1Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, USA 2Vasundhara, Plot No. #1731/C, Das Mohapatra Complex, Opposite of Sai Villa PO: KIIT Campus, Dist: Khurdha Bhubaneswar, Odisha, KIIT Square, Patia Station Rd, Patia, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha 751024, India 3Department of Geographical Sciences, ENSP Land Use Adviser, Affiliate Faculty Department of Women’s Studies, Affiliate Faculty American Studies, University of Maryland, USA Copyright©2016 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract The emergence and diffusion of community-based forest management (CBFM) in the community-based forest management (CBFM) in India over villages of Boduh district in the eastern Indian state of the past several decades has been of interest to scholars and Odisha. CBFM refers to a broad range of strategies and natural resource managers alike. The prevailing view in the practices for the management of forests, agroforests, and existing academic literature presupposes that CBFM arose forest resources by local communities and small-holders; in spontaneously in individual villages, evolving into a India,
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Introduction the Historical Context of Community Forestry
    Page 1 of 17 WHERE'S THE FORESTRY IN COMMUNITY FORESTRY? D. G. Donovan, D.Phil. Program on Environment East-West Center Honolulu, Hawaii Abstract The modern form of community forestry, developed over the past two decades, has focused mainly on what might be called forest organization in the context of forest management. With this focus of forestry on the social and cultural institutions of resource use and management, the technical aspects of forestry, especially the scientific element, have been marginalized. Implicitly, it was assumed that existing silvicultural systems would suffice to meet community demands on forest resources. The participatory planning and "learning-from-locals" techniques applied to the development of new systems of forest management were less often applied to the modification of actual field operations and the development of silvicultural systems. In some cases, management practices reverted to those of traditional systems, while in other instances officials promoted the integration of trees into farming systems, which many saw as an alternative to conventional silviculture. In effect the forestry profession has failed to bring its greatest strength - the understanding of the scientific principles of forest ecology and the protocols of forestry research - to bear on the development of more productive silvicultural systems for natural forests under community management. The first step to a better understanding of the productive potential of community forests should be to explore and exploit the existing wealth of knowledge and experience in forest -based communities. This paper examines some of the historical reasons why the technical aspects of forest management and indigenous technical knowledge have been marginalized in community forestry.
    [Show full text]