DOCSLIB.ORG

Horizontal Dirac Operators in CR Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Horizontal Dirac Operators in CR Geometry Horizontal Dirac Operators in CR Geometry DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Mathematik eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at der Humboldt-Universitat¨ zu Berlin von Dipl.-Math. Christoph Martin Stadtm¨uller Pr¨asidentin der Humboldt-Universit¨atzu Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr. Sabine Kunst Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨at Prof. Dr. Elmar Kulke Gutachter 1. Prof. Dr. Helga Baum 2. Prof. Dr. Uwe Semmelmann 3. Prof. Dr. Bernd Ammann Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:14. Juli 2017 Contents Introduction v 1 Contact and CR manifolds and their adapted connections 1 1.1 Contact manifolds . 1 1.2 CR manifolds . 13 1.3 Differential forms on metric contact manifolds . 19 1.3.1 The forms over the contact distribution . 21 1.3.2 The other parts . 23 1.3.3 Application: K¨ahlerform and Nijenhuis tensor . 24 1.4 Adapted connections . 27 1.4.1 Definition and basic properties . 28 1.4.2 The torsion tensor of an adapted connection . 29 1.4.3 The Tanaka-Webster connection and CR connections . 34 1.4.4 Adapted connections with skew-symmetric torsion . 36 1.5 The curvature tensors of an adapted connection . 37 2 Spin geometry on metric contact and CR manifolds 43 2.1 Crash course spin geometry . 43 2.1.1 Clifford algebras and the spin group . 43 2.1.2 Spin manifolds . 47 2.2 Connections and Dirac operators . 49 2.3 The spinor bundle over metric contact manifolds . 54 3 Horizontal Dirac operators 59 3.1 Definition and basic properties . 59 3.2 Weitzenb¨ock and Schr¨odinger-Lichnerowicz type formulae . 69 3.3 CR-conformal covariance . 82 3.4 Example: S1-bundles . 87 η 3.4.1 Application: the spectrum of DH on spheres . 92 3.5 Example: Compact quotients of the Heisenberg group . 101 4 Analysis of the horizontal Dirac Operators: Heisenberg Calculus 115 4.1 Introduction . 115 4.2 Heisenberg manifolds and their tangent groups . 117 4.2.1 Coordinates adapted to Heisenberg manifolds . 120 iii Introduction 4.3 Heisenberg order and Heisenberg symbol of differential operators . 124 4.4 Heisenberg pseudodifferential operators . 129 4.4.1 Invariant pseudodifferential operators on the tangent group . 131 4.4.2 Pseudodifferential operators { local theory . 139 4.4.3 Heisenberg pseudodifferential operators on manifolds . 145 4.5 Hypoellipticity of H-differential operators . 151 4.5.1 Rockland operators . 151 4.5.2 Hypoellipticity of Heisenberg differential operators . 153 4.5.3 Spectrum of Heisenberg-elliptic differential operators . 155 4.5.4 Operators of Sublaplace type on CR manifolds . 160 4.5.5 The Tanaka-Webster operator on the extremal bundles . 165 Appendix: Some functional analysis 171 A.1 Test functions, distributions and the Fourier transform . 171 A.2 Fredholm operators . 175 A.3 Sobolev spaces . 176 iv Introduction 2m+1 m+1 Consider a hypersurface M of real codimension one in C or, more generally, in a complex manifold. In particular, such a hypersurface may arise as the boundary m+1 of a complex domain Ω ⊂ C . Then, its tangent space TpM at any p 2 M cannot be stable under multiplication with the imaginary unit i as it is of odd real dimension. Its largest subspace that is stable under i is given as Hp = TpM \i·TpM. Then, the multiplication with i descends to an isomorphism Jp : Hp ! Hp such that 2 Jp = − IdHp and the integrability conditions [JX; Y ] + [X; JY ] 2 Γ(H) [JX; JY ] − [X; Y ] − J([JX; Y ] + [X; JY ]) = 0 for all X; Y 2 Γ(H) are satisfied. This is the standard model for CR manifolds and an abstract CR manifold is then defined as an odd-dimensional manifold M 2m+1 together with a distribution H ⊂ TM of rank 2m and a fibrewise isomorphism J : H ! H that satisfy the conditions above. Let it be noted that more general notions of CR manifolds allowing higher codimension of H and not requiring inte- grability of J exist, but we will content ourselves with the more restrictive definition above. The oldest results on what has since developed into CR geometry are due to 2 Poincar´e[Poi07] who showed that two real hypersurfaces of C are generally not biholomorphically equivalent. This was generalised to higher dimensions by Chern and Moser [CM74] and N. Tanaka [Tan62]. Much of the early literature on CR geometry is decidedly analytic in nature, discussing certain PDEs on CR manifolds, for instance [Koh63, KR65, Koh65]. An more geometrically flavoured investigation began with the works of S.M. Web- ster [Web78] and N. Tanaka [Tan75] introducing a metric and a connection on CR- manifolds as follows: If M is oriented, then there exists a (non-unique) one-form η 2 Ω1(M) such that H = ker η. To such a form, one associates the Levi form 2 ∗ Lη 2 Γ(Sym H ) via 1 Lη(X; Y ) = 2 dη(X; JY ): If Lη is positive-definite, we obtain a metric gη on M, the so-called Webster metric defined by gη = Lη + η ⊗ η; v Introduction which allows us to do geometry in the Riemannian sense on M. In this case, (M; H; J; η) is called a strictly pseudoconvex CR manifold. On such a manifold, m η is in fact a contact form, i.e. it satisfies η ^ (dη) 6= 0, and moreover, gη is com- patible with η and J in the sense that 2gη(JX; Y ) = dη(X; Y ), where we extend J by zero on H?. This includes strictly pseudoconvex CR manifolds in the larger class of metric contact manifolds, i.e. tuples (M; g; η; J) of a Riemannian metric g on M, 1 η 2 Ω (M) and J 2 End(M) such that kηkg = 1 (pointwise), 2g(JX; Y ) = dη(X; Y ) and J 2 = − Id +η ⊗ η]. Note that the Riemannian structure on a CR manifold is unique only up to the choice of η which can be conformally changed by any function u 2 C1(M) to obtain a new strictly pseudoconvex structure formη ~ = e2uη. The main ingredient in Riemannian geometry beside a metric g is a connection r. In particular, if one has additional geometric objects on the manifold, one would like them to be parallel under the connection. In the case of a strictly pseudoconvex CR manifold, J will never be parallel under the Levi-Civita connection rg (unlike in the almost-Hermitian case, where J is parallel under rg in the subclass of K¨ahlerman- ifolds). Thus, we replace rg with an adapted connection, i.e. a metric connection that parallelises J (and thus η). The most well-known of these adapted connections is the Tanaka-Webster rη connection developed independently by N. Tanaka and S.M. Webster that is defined through its torsion, which is given by 1 T (X; Y ) = dη(X; Y )ξ and T (ξ; X) = 2 ([X; ξ] + J[JX; ξ]) for X; Y 2 Γ(H), where ξ is the Reeb vector field characterised equivalently as the metric dual of η or by η(ξ) = 1 and ξydη = 0. While the Tanaka-Webster connection is used in most work on CR manifolds, the space of adapted connections is much larger. Some examples of adapted connections have been constructed by L. Nicolaescu [Nic05] (through Hermitian connections on M × R) and (in the five-dimensional case) by C. Puhle [Puh11]. It is then a nat- ural question how large the space of adapted connections is and how they can be characterised. In the almost-Hermitian case (which, to some extent, is the even- dimensional analogue of metric contact manifolds) such a classification of Hermitian connections is available, it is due to P. Libermann [Lib54] (compare also the dis- cussion in modern language by P. Gauduchon [Gau97]). In this thesis, we give an explicit description of the class of adapted connections on a general metric contact manifold. Any metric connection is defined by its torsion tensor and through a care- ful decomposition of the space Ω2(M; T M), we can explicitly describe the space of torsion tensors of adapted connections (cf Theorem 1.4.3). Theorem. Let (M; g; η; J) be a metric contact manifold and r an adapted connec- tion. Then its torsion tensor has the following form: 0;2 9 3 1 T = N + 8 ! − 8 M! + B + ξ ⊗ dη − 2 η ^ (JJ ) + η ^ Φ; vi Introduction where ! is a three-form on H whose decomposition into (p; q)-forms consists only of forms of type (2; 1) and (1; 2), B 2 Ω2(H; H) satisfies B(J·;J·) = B and vanishes under the Bianchi operator and Φ is a skew-symmetric endomorphism of H satisfying ΦJ = JΦ. The other parts are completely determined by the geometry of the contact structure. Conversely, given any !; B; Φ as above there exists exactly one adapted connection r(!; B; Φ) whose torsion is as given above. In this description, the Tanaka-Webster connection is the connection obtained by setting all freely choosable parts to zero. We would now like to do spin geometry over CR manifolds. In Riemannian man- ifolds, a lot of geometric information is reflected in the spin Dirac operator of the manifold and the hope is that the CR geometry is similarly reflected in an appropri- ately chosen Dirac operator. Beside this interest for the possible information about the CR geometry itself, this is also of interest in Lorentzian geometry. Through the Feffermann construction (originally described by C. Feffermann [Fef76] for products 1 m+1 @Ω × S where Ω ⊂ C is a complex domain), one obtains a Lorentzian metric Fη on S1-bundles over a strictly pseudoconvex CR manifold (M; H; J; η).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gsm025-Endmatter.Pdf
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/gsm/025 Selected Titles in This Series 25 Thomas Friedrich, Dirac operators in Riemannian geometry, 2000 24 Helmut Koch, Number theory: Algebraic numbers and functions, 2000 23 Alberto Candel and Lawrence Conlon, Foliations I, 2000 22 Giinter R. Krause and Thomas H. Lenagan, Growth of algebras and Gelfand-Kirillov dimension, 2000 21 John B. Conway, A course in operator theory, 2000 20 Robert E. Gompf and Andras I. Stipsicz, 4-manifolds and Kirby calculus, 1999 19 Lawrence C. Evans, Partial differential equations, 1998 18 Winfried Just and Martin Weese, Discovering modern set theory. II: Set-theoretic tools for every mathematician, 1997 17 Henryk Iwaniec, Topics in classical automorphic forms, 1997 16 Richard V. Kadison and John R. Ringrose, Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras. Volume II: Advanced theory, 1997 15 Richard V. Kadison and John R. Ringrose, Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras. Volume I: Elementary theory, 1997 14 Elliott H. Lieb and Michael Loss, Analysis, 1997 13 Paul C. Shields, The ergodic theory of discrete sample paths, 1996 12 N. V. Krylov, Lectures on elliptic and parabolic equations in Holder spaces, 1996 11 Jacques Dixmier, Enveloping algebras, 1996 Printing 10 Barry Simon, Representations of finite and compact groups, 1996 9 Dino Lorenzini, An invitation to arithmetic geometry, 1996 8 Winfried Just and Martin Weese, Discovering modern set theory. I: The basics, 1996 7 Gerald J. Janusz, Algebraic number fields, second edition, 1996 6 Jens Carsten Jantzen, Lectures on quantum groups, 1996 5 Rick Miranda, Algebraic curves and Riemann surfaces, 1995 4 Russell A.
    [Show full text]
  • Â-Genus and Collapsing
    The Journal of Geometric Analysis Volume 10, Number 3, 2000 A A-Genus and Collapsing By John Lott ABSTRACT. If M is a compact spin manifold, we give relationships between the vanishing of A( M) and the possibility that M can collapse with curvature bounded below. 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to extend the following simple lemma. Lemma 1.I. If M is a connectedA closed Riemannian spin manifold of nonnegative sectional curvature with dim(M) > 0, then A(M) = O. Proof Let K denote the sectional curvature of M and let R denote its scalar curvature. Suppose that A(M) (: O. Let D denote the Dirac operator on M. From the Atiyah-Singer index theorem, there is a nonzero spinor field 7t on M such that D~p = 0. From Lichnerowicz's theorem, 0 = IDOl 2 dvol = IV~Pl 2 dvol + ~- I•12 dvol. (1.1) From our assumptions, R > 0. Hence V~p = 0. This implies that I~k F2 is a nonzero constant function on M and so we must also have R = 0. Then as K > 0, we must have K = 0. This implies, from the integral formula for A'(M) [14, p. 231], that A"(M) = O. [] The spin condition is necessary in Lemma 1.l, as can be seen in the case of M = CP 2k. The Ricci-analog of Lemma 1.1 is false, as can be seen in the case of M = K3. Definition 1.2. A connected closed manifold M is almost-nonnegatively-curved if for every E > 0, there is a Riemannian metric g on M such that K(M, g) diam(M, g)2 > -E.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-EXISTENCE of METRIC on Tn with POSITIVE SCALAR
    NON-EXISTENCE OF METRIC ON T n WITH POSITIVE SCALAR CURVATURE CHAO LI Abstract. In this note we present Gromov-Lawson's result on the non-existence of metric on T n with positive scalar curvature. Historical results Scalar curvature is one of the simplest invariants of a Riemannian manifold. In general dimensions, this function (the average of all sectional curvatures at a point) is a weak measure of the local geometry, hence it's suspicious that it has no relation to the global topology of the manifold. In fact, a result of Kazdan-Warner in 1975 states that on a compact manifold of dimension ≥ 3, every smooth function which is negative somewhere, is the scalar curvature of some Riemannian metric. However people know that there are manifolds which carry no metric whose scalar scalar curvature is everywhere positive. The first examples of such manifolds were given in 1962 by Lichnerowicz. It is known that if X is a compact spin manifold and A^ 6= 0 then by Lichnerowicz formula (which will be discussed later) then X doesn't carry any metric with everywhere positive scalar curvature. Note that spin assumption is essential here, since the complex projective plane has positive sectional curvature and non-zero A^-genus. Despite these impressive results, one simple question remained open: Can the torus T n, n ≥ 3, carry a metric of positive scalar curvature? This question was settled for n ≤ 7 by R. Schoen and S. T. Yau. Their method involves the existence of smooth solution of Plateau problem, so the dimension restriction n ≤ 7 is essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry of Noncommutative Three-Dimensional Flat Manifolds
    Philosophiae Doctor Dissertation GEOMETRY OF NONCOMMUTATIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL FLAT MANIFOLDS Piotr Olczykowski Krakow´ 2012 Dla moich Rodzic´ow Contents Introduction ix 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 C∗−algebras . .1 1.2 Gelfand-Naimark-Seagal Theorem . .3 1.2.1 Commutative Case . .4 1.2.2 Noncommutative Case . .4 1.3 C∗-dynamical systems . .7 1.3.1 Fixed Point Algebras of C(M)..............8 1.4 K−theory in a Nutshell . .8 1.5 Fredholm Modules in a Nutshell . 10 1.5.1 Pairing between K−theory and K−homology . 12 1.5.2 Unbounded Fredholm Modules . 12 2 Spectral Triples 15 2.1 Spin Structures . 15 2.1.1 Clifford Algebras . 15 2.1.2 SO(n) and Spin(n) Groups . 16 2.1.3 Representation of the Clifford Algebra . 17 2.1.4 Spin Structures and Bundles . 18 2.2 Classical Dirac Operator . 20 2.3 Real Spectral Triple { Definition . 23 2.3.1 Axioms . 24 2.3.2 Commutative Real Spectral Triples . 27 3 Noncommutative Spin Structures 29 3.1 Noncommutative Spin Structure . 29 3.2 Equivariant Spectral Triples - Definition . 31 3.3 Noncommutati Tori . 32 3.3.1 Algebra . 33 3.3.2 Representation . 34 v vi CONTENTS T3 3.3.3 Equivariant real spectral triples over A( Θ)...... 35 3.4 Quotient Spaces . 36 3.4.1 Reducible spectral triples . 36 Z 3.4.2 Spectral Triples over A(T1) N .............. 38 3.4.3 Summary . 40 4 Noncommutative Bieberbach Manifolds 41 4.1 Classical Bieberbach Manifolds . 42 4.2 Three-dimensional Bieberbach Manifolds . 44 4.2.1 Spin structures over Bieberbach manifolds .
    [Show full text]
  • Gsm038-Endmatter.Pdf
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/gsm/038 Selected Titles in This Series 38 Elton P. Hsu, Stochastic analysis on manifolds, 2002 37 Hershel M. Farkas and Irwin Kra, Theta constants, Riemann surfaces and the modular group, 2001 36 Martin Schechter, Principles of functional analysis, second edition, 2002 35 James F. Davis and Paul Kirk, Lecture notes in algebraic topology, 2001 34 Sigurdur Helgason, Differential geometry, Lie groups, and symmetric spaces, 2001 33 Dmitri Burago, Yuri Burago, and Sergei Ivanov, A course in metric geometry, 2001 32 Robert G. Bartle, A modern theory of integration, 2001 31 Ralf Korn and Elke Korn, Option pricing and portfolio optimization: Modern methods of financial mathematics, 2001 30 J. C. McConnell and J. C. Robson, Noncommutative Noetherian rings, 2001 29 Javier Duoandikoetxea, Fourier analysis, 2001 28 Liviu I. Nicolaescu, Notes on Seiberg-Witten theory, 2000 27 Thierry Aubin, A course in differential geometry, 2001 26 Rolf Berndt, An introduction to symplectic geometry, 2001 25 Thomas Friedrich, Dirac operators in Riemannian geometry, 2000 24 Helmut Koch, Number theory: Algebraic numbers and functions, 2000 23 Alberto Candel and Lawrence Conlon, Foliations I, 2000 22 Giinter R. Krause and Thomas H. Lenagan, Growth of algebras and Gelfand-Kirillov dimension, 2000 21 John B. Conway, A course in operator theory, 2000 20 Robert E. Gompf and Andras I. Stipsicz, 4-manifolds and Kirby calculus, 1999 19 Lawrence C. Evans, Partial differential equations, 1998 18 Winfried Just and Martin Weese, Discovering modern set theory. II: Set-theoretic tools for every mathematician, 1997 17 Henryk Iwaniec, Topics in classical automorphic forms, 1997 16 Richard V.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac Spectra, Summation Formulae, and the Spectral Action
    Dirac Spectra, Summation Formulae, and the Spectral Action Thesis by Kevin Teh In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2013 (Submitted May 2013) i Acknowledgements I wish to thank my parents, who have given me their unwavering support for longer than I can remember. I would also like to thank my advisor, Matilde Marcolli, for her encourage- ment and many helpful suggestions. ii Abstract Noncommutative geometry is a source of particle physics models with matter Lagrangians coupled to gravity. One may associate to any noncommutative space (A; H; D) its spectral action, which is defined in terms of the Dirac spectrum of its Dirac operator D. When viewing a spin manifold as a noncommutative space, D is the usual Dirac operator. In this paper, we give nonperturbative computations of the spectral action for quotients of SU(2), Bieberbach manifolds, and SU(3) equipped with a variety of geometries. Along the way we will compute several Dirac spectra and refer to applications of this computation. iii Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii 1 Introduction 1 2 Quaternionic Space, Poincar´eHomology Sphere, and Flat Tori 5 2.1 Introduction . 5 2.2 The quaternionic cosmology and the spectral action . 6 2.2.1 The Dirac spectra for SU(2)=Q8.................... 6 2.2.2 Trivial spin structure: nonperturbative spectral action . 7 2.2.3 Nontrivial spin structures: nonperturbative spectral action . 9 2.3 Poincar´ehomology sphere . 10 2.3.1 Generating functions for spectral multiplicities . 10 2.3.2 The Dirac spectrum of the Poincar´esphere .
    [Show full text]
  • Duality and Distribution Cohomology of CR Manifolds
    ANNALI DELLA SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE DI PISA Classe di Scienze C. DENSON HILL M. NACINOVICH Duality and distribution cohomology ofCR manifolds Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4e série, tome 22, no 2 (1995), p. 315-339 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1995_4_22_2_315_0> © Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1995, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Duality and Distribution Cohomology of CR Manifolds C. DENSON HILL - M. NACINOVICH Our aim here is to investigate the am-complexes on currents, in the sense of de Rham [deR], associated to a CR manifold M of arbitrary CR dimension and codimension. This brings into play global distribution aM-cohomology on M, and involves its relationship to the smooth 5m-cohomology on M, as well as its connection with the classical Dolbeault cohomology of an ambient complex manifold X, in the case where M is assumed to be embeddable. We also discuss compact abstract CR manifolds M, and achieve a duality formula which is in the spirit of de Rham [deR] and Serre [S] for real and complex manifolds respectively, and which is related to the work [AK], [AB].
    [Show full text]
  • THE DIRAC OPERATOR 1. First Properties 1.1. Definition. Let X Be A
    THE DIRAC OPERATOR AKHIL MATHEW 1. First properties 1.1. Definition. Let X be a Riemannian manifold. Then the tangent bundle TX is a bundle of real inner product spaces, and we can form the corresponding Clifford bundle Cliff(TX). By definition, the bundle Cliff(TX) is a vector bundle of Z=2-graded R-algebras such that the fiber Cliff(TX)x is just the Clifford algebra Cliff(TxX) (for the inner product structure on TxX). Definition 1. A Clifford module on X is a vector bundle V over X together with an action Cliff(TX) ⊗ V ! V which makes each fiber Vx into a module over the Clifford algebra Cliff(TxX). Suppose now that V is given a connection r. Definition 2. The Dirac operator D on V is defined in local coordinates by sending a section s of V to X Ds = ei:rei s; for feig a local orthonormal frame for TX and the multiplication being Clifford multiplication. It is easy to check that this definition is independent of the coordinate system. A more invariant way of defining it is to consider the composite of differential operators (1) V !r T ∗X ⊗ V ' TX ⊗ V,! Cliff(TX) ⊗ V ! V; where the first map is the connection, the second map is the isomorphism T ∗X ' TX determined by the Riemannian structure, the third map is the natural inclusion, and the fourth map is Clifford multiplication. The Dirac operator is clearly a first-order differential operator. We can work out its symbol fairly easily. The symbol1 of the connection r is ∗ Sym(r)(v; t) = iv ⊗ t; v 2 Vx; t 2 Tx X: All the other differential operators in (1) are just morphisms of vector bundles.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Spin Geometry is the hidden facet of Riemannian Geometry. It arises from the representation theory of the special orthogonal group SOn, more precisely, from the spinor representation, a certain representation of the Lie algebra son which is not a representation of SOn. Spinors can always be constructed locally on a given Riemannian manifold, but globally there are topological obstructions for their exis- tence. Spin Geometry lies therefore at the cross-road of several subelds of modern Mathematics. Algebra, Geometry, Topology, and Analysis are subtly interwoven in the theory of spinors, both in their denition and in their applications. Spinors have also greatly inuenced Theoretical Physics, which is nowadays one of the main driv- ing forces fostering their formidable development. The Noncommutative Geometry of Alain Connes has at its core the Dirac operator on spinors. The same Dirac operator is at the heart of the Atiyah–Singer index formula for elliptic operators on compact manifolds, linking in a spectacular way the topology of a manifold to the space of solutions to elliptic equations. Signicantly, the classical Riemann–Roch formula and its generalization by Hirzebruch; the Gauß–Bonnet formula and its extension by Chern; and nally Hirzebruch’s topological signature theorem, provide most of the examples in the index formula, but it was the Dirac operator acting on spinors which turned out to be the keystone of the index formula, both in its formulation and in its subsequent developments. The Dirac operator appears to be the primordial example of an elliptic operator, while spinors, although younger than differential forms or tensors, illustrate once again that aux âmes bien nées, la valeur n’attend point le nombre des années.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectra of Orbifolds with Cyclic Fundamental Groups
    SPECTRA OF ORBIFOLDS WITH CYCLIC FUNDAMENTAL GROUPS EMILIO A. LAURET Abstract. We give a simple geometric characterization of isospectral orbifolds covered by spheres, complex projective spaces and the quaternion projective line having cyclic fundamen- tal group. The differential operators considered are Laplace-Beltrami operators twisted by characters of the corresponding fundamental group. To prove the characterization, we first give an explicit description of their spectra by using generating functions. We also include many isospectral examples. 1. Introduction Let M be a connected compact Riemannian manifold, and let Γ1 and Γ2 be cyclic subgroups of Iso(M). In this paper we will consider the question: Under what conditions the (good) orbifolds Γ1\M and Γ2\M are isospectral? Here, isospectral means that the Laplace-Beltrami operators on Γ1\M and on Γ2\M have the same spectrum. Such operators are given by the Laplace-Beltrami operator on M acting on Γj-invariant smooth functions on M. Clearly, the condition on Γ1 and Γ2 of being conjugate in Iso(M) is sufficient since in this case Γ1\M and Γ2\M are isometric. However, it is well known that this condition is not necessary due to examples of non-isometric isospectral lens spaces constructed by Ikeda [Ik80a]. Lens spaces are spherical space forms with cyclic fundamental groups, that is, they are the only compact manifolds with constant sectional curvature and cyclic fundamental group. In the recent paper [LMR15], R. Miatello, J.P. Rossetti and the author show an isospectral characterization among lens spaces in terms of isospectrality of their associated congruence lattices with respect to the one-norm k·k1.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculation of Supercritical Dirac Resonances in Heavy-Ion Collisions
    CALCULATION OF SUPERCRITICAL DIRAC RESONANCES IN HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS EDWARD ACKAD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY arXiv:0809.4256v2 [physics.atom-ph] 26 Sep 2008 GRADUATE PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO 2021 CALCULATION OF SUPERCRITICAL DIRAC RESONANCES IN HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS by Edward Ackad a dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Stud- ies of York University in partial fulfilment of the require- ments for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY c 2021 Permission has been granted to: a) YORK UNIVER- SITY LIBRARIES to lend or sell copies of this disserta- tion in paper, microform or electronic formats, and b) LI- BRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA to reproduce, lend, distribute, or sell copies of this dissertation anywhere in the world in microform, paper or electronic formats and to authorise or procure the reproduction, loan, distribu- tion or sale of copies of this dissertation anywhere in the world in microform, paper or electronic formats. The author reserves other publication rights, and nei- ther the dissertation nor extensive extracts for it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author’s written permission. CALCULATION OF SUPERCRITICAL DIRAC RESONANCES IN HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS by Edward Ackad By virtue of submitting this document electronically, the author certifies that this is a true electronic equivalent of the copy of the dissertation approved by York University for the award of the degree. No alteration of the content has occurred and if there are any minor variations in formatting, they are as a result of the coversion to Adobe Acrobat format (or similar software application).
    [Show full text]
  • New Invariants in CR and Contact Geometry Gautier Dietrich
    New invariants in CR and contact geometry Gautier Dietrich To cite this version: Gautier Dietrich. New invariants in CR and contact geometry. Differential Geometry [math.DG]. Université Montpellier, 2018. English. NNT : 2018MONTS016. tel-01977216 HAL Id: tel-01977216 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01977216 Submitted on 10 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTPELLIER en Mathématiques et Modélisation École doctorale I2S Institut montpelliérain Alexander Grothendieck, UMR 5149 CNRS - Université de Montpellier Nouveaux invariants en géométrie CR et de contact présentée par Gautier DIETRICH le 19 octobre 2018 sous la direction de Marc HERZLICH devant le jury composé de Olivier BIQUARD Professeur, École normale supérieure Président du jury Colin GUILLARMOU Directeur de recherche, Université Paris-Sud Rapporteur Marc HERZLICH Professeur, Université de Montpellier Directeur de thèse Emmanuel HUMBERT Professeur, Université de Tours Examinateur Constantin VERNICOS Maître de conférences, Université de Montpellier Examinateur iii « Voilà, Adso, la bibliothèque a été construite par un esprit humain qui pensait de façon mathématique. Il s’agit donc de confronter nos propo- sitions avec les propositions du bâtisseur, et de cette confrontation la science peut surgir.
    [Show full text]