DOCSLIB.ORG

C. Natural Resources Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C. Natural Resources Management Plan C. NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL BIDWELL PARK MASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... C.1-1 1.1 Relationship to the Master Management Plan.....................................................................................C.1-1 1.2 Purpose and Organization of the Plan.................................................................................................C.1-1 1.3 Natural Resource Goals and Objectives Summary .............................................................................C.1-1 1.4 Sensitive Resources.............................................................................................................................C.1-2 1.5 Adaptive Management Framework.....................................................................................................C.1-3 1.6 Public Education and Involvement .....................................................................................................C.1-3 2 NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.......................... C.2-1 3 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT........................................................................................................... C.3-1 3.1 Oak Woodlands...................................................................................................................................C.3-1 3.1.1 Overview of Bidwell Park Oak Woodlands .................................................................................C.3-1 3.1.2 Oak Woodland Management Objectives ......................................................................................C.3-1 3.1.3 Oak Management Issues...............................................................................................................C.3-1 3.1.4 Oak Management Guidelines and Recommendations..................................................................C.3-3 4 INVASIVE PLANT MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................... C.4-1 4.1 Overview of invasive plants................................................................................................................C.4-1 4.1.1 Invasive Plant Ecology .................................................................................................................C.4-1 4.1.2 Invasive Plant Effects ...................................................................................................................C.4-1 4.2 Invasive Plant Management Objectives ..............................................................................................C.4-2 4.3 Invasive Plant Management Issues .....................................................................................................C.4-2 4.3.1 Invasive Plant Population Profiles................................................................................................C.4-2 4.3.2 Wildlife Habitat Provision............................................................................................................C.4-2 4.4 Invasive Plant Management Guidelines and Recommendations ........................................................C.4-3 4.4.1 Population Mapping and Baseline Assessment ............................................................................C.4-3 4.4.2 Prioritization and Treatment Identification ..................................................................................C.4-3 4.4.3 Park Staff and Volunteer Training and Education........................................................................C.4-4 4.4.4 Treatment Methods.......................................................................................................................C.4-7 4.4.5 Post-Treatment Restoration........................................................................................................C.4-10 4.4.6 Treatment and Long-Term Monitoring and Adaptive Management ..........................................C.4-10 5 FIRE MANAGEMENT............................................................................................................................. C.5-1 5.1 Fire Overview......................................................................................................................................C.5-1 5.1.1 Fire Ecology.................................................................................................................................C.5-1 5.1.2 Fire History of Bidwell Park.........................................................................................................C.5-2 5.1.3 Bidwell Park Fire Environment....................................................................................................C.5-3 5.2 Fire Management Objectives ..............................................................................................................C.5-3 5.3 Fire Management Issues......................................................................................................................C.5-3 5.3.1 Wildlife Habitat ............................................................................................................................C.5-4 5.3.2 Combined Impacts........................................................................................................................C.5-4 5.3.3 Public Safety.................................................................................................................................C.5-4 5.4 Fire Management Guidelines and Recommendations.........................................................................C.5-5 5.4.1 Wildfire Reduction and Management...........................................................................................C.5-5 5.4.2 Prescribed Burning.......................................................................................................................C.5-7 5.4.3 Post-fire Rehabilitation.................................................................................................................C.5-9 Final Bidwell Park Master Management Plan Update City of Chico Park Division C-i Natural Resources Management Plan 6 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. C.6-1 7 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................... C.7-1 TABLES C.4-1 Attributes of Invasive Plants within Bidwell Park ..............................................................................C.4-5 C.4-2 Comparison of Invasive Plant Treatment Methods.............................................................................C.4-8 C.5-1 Potential for Extreme Wildfire within Bidwell Park...........................................................................C.5-3 C.6-1 List of Additional Resources...............................................................................................................C.6-1 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service BPMMP Bidwell Park Master Management Plan CAL-IPC California Invasive Plant Council CDF Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CEQA California Environmental Quality Act GIS geographic information systems GPS geopositioning systems I incipient populations NRMP Natural Resources Management Plan PG&E Pacific Gas & Electric SOD Sudden Oak Death U ubiquitous populations UHF Ultra High Frequency VMP Vegetation Management Program WIMS Weed Information Management System WS widespread populations Final Bidwell Park Master Management Plan Update Natural Resources Management Plan C-ii City of Chico Park Division 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 RELATIONSHIP TO THE MASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN The Bidwell Park Natural Resources Management Plan (NRMP) is intended to provide a basic resource management framework for Bidwell Park (Park) that supports the goals and objectives of the Bidwell Park Master Management Plan (BPMMP). Chapter 2 of the BPMMP includes Park-wide resource assessments. Chapter 3 of the BPMMP contains the policy basis (goals and objectives) and implementation approach (strategies and guidelines) for Park operations. The NRMP provides information on how to achieve the goals and objectives provided in the BPMMP. It supplements the implementation strategies and guidelines in the BPMMP with more detailed information on a defined set of resources and establishes a framework for adding additional resource management information in the future. Resources to add to the NRMP may include soils, additional natural communities, vegetation elements, invasive animal species, or other physical or biological resources. The NRMP has its basis in the 1990 BPMMP for the Park (Hardesty Associates 1990) that contained a suite of natural resource management elements (oak renewal, fire plan, invasive plants and vegetation management). During the 2005 BPMMP update, these natural resource elements were shifted from the BPMMP to this separate, focused NRMP that is included as an appendix to the BPMMP. Although the basic organization of the 1990 plan has been retained, major portions of each section have been revised to address changes in resource conditions, Park management priorities, and approaches to resource management. 1.2 PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN The purpose of the NRMP is to provide a functional framework for managing resources within the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Existing Conditions and Issues
    2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ISSUES 2.1 PARK SUMMARY The following section summarizes the significant natural and cultural resources at Bidwell- Sacramento River State Park (Park), as well as surrounding land uses, recreational and aesthetic resources, and interpretive facilities that characterize the existing conditions at the Park. The evaluation of existing conditions focuses on the current boundaries of the Park, but may address a larger planning area for some issues, where data are readily available and important to the understanding of regional resource conditions affecting the Park; moreover, regional-oriented resource information also provides context to information collected for the Park itself. Information on existing conditions is based on the Resources Inventory and Interpretive Prospectus that were prepared for the Park, recent field work, and additional research conducted during the General Plan preparation process. This information provides the baseline data for developing the area plans and goals/guidelines that comprise the foundation of this document. 2.1.1 STATE PARK CLASSIFICATION The State Park System is organized by a multi-level classification system. The classifications are described in Sections 5019.50 et seq. of Article 1.7 of the Public Resources Code. In 1990, the State Parks and Recreation Commission named and classified the Bidwell River Park Project and the Irvine Finch River Access area as Bidwell-Sacramento River State Park. • State Parks. Units that consist of spacious areas having outstanding natural, cultural, and scenic resources. Preservation of these resources for present and future generations is the primary purpose of State Parks. Improvements may be undertaken in State Parks to make these resources and the recreational opportunities they provide available to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Snow Goose Festival of the Pacific Flyway Wednesday, January 22 Field Trips Birds, River, & Riparian Forests NEW
    2020 Snow Goose Festival of the Pacific Flyway Wednesday, January 22 Field Trips Birds, River, & Riparian Forests NEW Wed 7:30 am - 12:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center Birds and wildlife are right at home in these two restored riparian areas along the Sacramento River. Join one of the area’s top birders as you hike into two large scale habitat restorations sites, Hamilton City Project and the Ord Bend Unit, where reviving the native habitat was essential to birds, wildlife, and flood protection for communities. The river is a magnet for birds, and some past sightings have included Peregrine Falcon, Bald Eagle, Barrow's Goldeneye, and White-throated Sparrow. Bring snacks, water, and binoculars. A$25 - Y$10 Level 2 Field Trip Leader: Michael Rogner Soils, Landforms, & Vegetation of Bidwell Park Wed 7:30 am - 12:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center This trip begins in the flood plain of Big Chico Creek and travels back in time across the older deposits of the creek and up onto the Cascade foothills. The first route covers a condensed sequence of the major landforms that occur in the Sacramento Valley as well as the transition to the Tuscan Formation in the Cascade foothills in less than 1 mile. The second route is a 1.5 mile one-way walk up the bottom of Big Chico Creek Canyon applying what was observed on the first route and viewing the slot canyon in the Lovejoy basalt which controls the stream dynamics in this reach of the canyon. Vegetation and habitats will be correlated to soil characteristics and landforms along both routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Ecological Baseline Conditions
    Chapter 3 Ecological Baseline Conditions 3.1 Introduction This chapter describes the current environmental conditions present in the Butte Regional Conservation Plan (BRCP) Plan Area and other information specific to meeting the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Natural Community Conservation Planning Act (NCCPA). The ecological information presented in this chapter will be used to identify the potential impacts of covered activities on covered species and natural communities and to develop measures to address impacts on and conservation of covered species and natural communities. Section 3.2, Physical Environment, describes the general physical environmental conditions of the Plan Area; Section 3.3, Land Cover Type Mapping, defines the land cover types present in the Plan Area and describes how they were delineated; Section 3.4, Covered Natural Communities, describes the ecological attributes and functions of the covered natural communities; Section 3.5, Covered Species, provides information on the species covered in the BRCP; Section 3.6, Covered Species, provides information on the noncovered special-status species addressed in the BRCP; and Section 3.7, Potential Jurisdictional Wetlands and Other Waters Jurisdictional waters of the United States, including wetlands, regulated under the CWA Section 404 are found in the Plan Area within the various land cover types mapped for the BRCP GIS database. Some land cover types, such as emergent wetlands, are likely entirely or nearly entirely jurisdictional wetlands. Other land cover types include jurisdictional wetlands within a larger matrix of uplands, such as grassland with vernal swale complex. Methods used to estimate the extent of jurisdictional wetlands and other waters are described in this section.
    [Show full text]
  • Butte County Forest Advisory Committee
    BUTTE COUNTY FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 23, 2017 - 5:00 P.M. Meeting ITEM NO. 1.00 Call to order – Butte County Public Works Facility, 44 Bellarmine Ct., Chico, CA 2.00 Pledge of allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America (if American flag is present) 2.01 Roll Call - Invited Guests: Cindi Dunsmoor (Butte County OEM), Randall Gould (Feather River District Ranger, Plumas NF), Kathleen Nelson (Almanor District Ranger, Lassen NF), Stacy Kroner (Lassen NF); Laura Page (Congressman La Malfa), Dave Derby (Cal Fire), Sarah Reynolds (BCRCD); Dennis Schmidt (Coordinating Committee), Tim Snellings (Coordinating Committee), Glenn Lunak (Forester) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.00 Consent Agenda 3.01 Review and approve minutes of 12-19-16 4.00 Agenda 4.01 Self-Introduction of Forest Advisory Committee Members, Alternates, Guests and Public – 5 Min. 4.02 Confirmation of Board Appointments: Recreation-Motorized: Repanich as Member, Severin as Alternate Economic Tourism: Walker as Member, Shary as Alternate 4.03 Election of Officers: Chair and Vice-Chair 4.04 OHV Grant Meetings with Plumas NF Debrief – Severin/Repanich 4.05 BLM Letter (due 2-03-17) to be considered by Board at meeting of 1-24-17, derived from January 2 FAC Workshop. Debrief of BLM Public Outreach meeting of January 9 and 18 from FAC attendees. 15 Min. 4.06 General Plan (GP2030) amendments – develop ideas for incorporation in to the GP2030 (l hour) 4.07 SOPA Review – Current Quarter: Discussion & required FAC action for projects affecting Butte County listed in 2017 SOPA Reports for Lassen and Plumas NF’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Colusa National Wildlife Refuge & Vicinity
    Wednesday, January 23 Field Trips Soils, Landforms, & Vegetation of Bidwell Park Wed 7:30 am - 12:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center This trip begins in the flood plain of Big Chico Creek and travels back in time across the older deposits of the creek and up onto the Cascade foothills. The first route covers a condensed sequence of the major landforms that occur in the Sacramento Valley as well as the transition to the Tuscan Formation in the Cascade foothills in less than 1 mile. The second route is a 1.5 mile one-way walk up the bottom of Big Chico Creek Canyon applying what was observed on the first route and viewing the slot canyon in the Lovejoy basalt which controls the stream dynamics in this reach of the canyon. Vegetation and habitats will be correlated to soil characteristics and landforms along both routes. We will do some free-style birding on our hike back. Please bring water, snacks, and binoculars. Dress warmly and wear hiking shoes. A$25 - Y$10 Level 3 Field Trip Leaders: Andrew Conlin and Birder, John Seid Up the Creek with a Pair of Binoculars Wed 9:00 am - 2:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center The Big Chico Creek Ecological Reserve (BCCER) is part of the larger Big Chico Creek watershed and home to a great diversity of plants and animals, including over 100 bird species. A historical ranch, the BCCER is now a place for education, research, and habitat enhancement. We will bird the diverse oak woodland/chaparral/meadows of the upper canyon, with some spectacular scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, January 25 Field Trips Bird Photography at Rancho Esquon
    18th Annual Snow Goose Festival of the Pacific Flyway January 25-29, 2017 Wednesday, January 25 Field Trips Bird Photography at Rancho Esquon Wed 7:00 am - 12:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center Bird photography is a rapidly-growing past-time. This workshop will be held at Rancho Esquon, a 900-acre private holding that is managed to assist the increase of suitable habitat essential to over 300 species of birds traveling along the Pacific Flyway. The workshop focuses on the basics of bird and other wildlife photography from its history, advances in equipment types, equipment uses and settings to the discussion of various field techniques. It includes where and how to best approach wildlife, what makes a good image, and ends with ethical and legal aspects. The hour-long PowerPoint presentation points out mistakes many novice photographers initially make and how to correct them. The session will be followed with a field trip to nearby wetlands for the purpose of applying some of the techniques discussed. Youth, age 16 & 17, are welcome. Dress warmly and bring water and a snack. A$27 - Y$10 Level 2 Field Trip Leader: Dean Carrier Soils, Landforms, & Vegetation of Bidwell Park NEW Wed 7:30 am - 12:00 pm Meet at Chico Masonic Family Center This trip begins in the flood plain of Big Chico Creek and travels back in time across the older deposits of the creek and up onto the Cascade foothills. The first route covers a condensed sequence of the major landforms that occur in the Sacramento Valley as well as the transition to the Tuscan Formation in the Cascade foothills in less than 1 mile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan
    The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Oak Woodland Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners In Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Oak Woodland Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2002 Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan California Partners in Flight - 2 - Conservation Plan Authors Lead author: Dr. Steve Zack Conservation Scientist North America Program Wildlife Conservation Society Correspondence: 1746 NW Hartwell Place Portland, OR 97229 E-mail: [email protected] Supporting Authors (Point Reyes Bird Observatory): Grant Ballard Mary Chase, Ph.D. Gregg Elliott Thomas Gardali Geoffrey R. Geupel Sacha Heath Diana Humple Mike Lynes Melissa Pitkin Sandy Scoggin Diana Stralberg Species Account Authors: Moe Flannery, PRBO Sue Guers, PRBO Diana Humple, PRBO Colin Lee, PRBO Corrina Lu, California PIF Mike Lynes, PRBO Mark Reynolds, Ph.D., The Nature Conservancy Financial Contributors: David and Lucile Packard Foundation California Oak Foundation Members and Friends For Further Information: California Oak Foundation - www.californiaoaks.org California Partners in Flight - www.prbo.org/calpif Wildlife Conservation Society - www.wcs.org Point Reyes Bird Observatory - www.prbo.org Oak Woodland Bird Conservation Plan California Partners in Flight - 3 - Data contributions: Point Reyes Bird Observatory Eastern Sierra Riparian Songbird Conservation Project Central Coast Riparian Bird Conservation Project Cosumnes Preserve Project Sacramento River Project Klamath Bird Observatory The Nature Conservancy – Cosumnes River Preserve California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Habitat Relations California Interagency Wildlife Task Group US Bureau of Reclamation, East Park Reservoir Madrone Audubon Society – Mayacamas Preserve Hastings Natural History Reservation USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Lab, Pacific Southwest Research Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Cultural Landscapes of the Sutter Buttes, Also Referred to in This Study As the Buttes
    MULTIPLE WAYS OF SEEING ONE PLACE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF THE SUTTER BUTTES, CALIFORNIA ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Anthropology ____________ by Melinda Button Fall 2009 MULTIPLE WAYS OF SEEING ONE PLACE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL LANDSCAPES OF THE SUTTER BUTTES, CALIFORNIA A Thesis by Melinda Button Fall 2009 APPROVED BY THE INTERIM DEAN OF THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE, INTERNATIONAL, AND INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES: _________________________________ Mark J. Morlock, Ph.D. APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE: _________________________________ Antoinette M. Martinez, Ph.D., Chair _________________________________ Georgia L. Fox, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My thesis is multidisciplinary and required input from several different fields of interest. As such, this project would not have been possible without the help of many people. First and foremost, I would like to thank John Geno Lucich, Beverly Ogle, and Patsy Seek, for sharing their knowledge with me. The interviews greatly added to the study and provided insights that would not have been visible otherwise. I would like to thank Leslie Stedil with the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) for all her help organizing information, introducing me to people, and inviting me to Peace Valley with DPR staff. I would like to thank Mike Hubbartt, a Sutter Butte resident, a Middle Mountain Foundation volunteer, and a DPR employee, for all his support and guidance, as well as providing me an opportunity to experience the Sutter Buttes first hand. I would also like to thank Dionne Gruver and Kathy Lindahl, also with DPR, for allowing me access to the survey report and site records from the 2005 survey of Peace Valley and for sharing their ideas and interpretations of the archaeological remains in the Sutter Buttes.
    [Show full text]
  • 8-1 A. Introduction a Wide Range of Recreational Facilities And
    8 RECREATION A. Introduction A wide range of recreational facilities and recreational programs are found in Butte County, offering numerous recreational opportunities to local residents and visitors. Most public recreational facilities and parks in the unincorporated County are owned and/or managed by one of five large independent special districts, or by various local, State and federal agencies, sometimes in joint arrangements. Others, including some facilities located within the incorporated jurisdictions, are owned and managed by the municipalities themselves. Privately-owned, commercial facilities such as campgrounds, golf courses, and bowling alleys also provide an important range of recreational and leisure activities. This chapter describes all of these various types of recreational facilities in Butte County. B. Regulatory Setting Parks and recreational open space are the most significantly regulated types of recreation facility. Provision of parks is generally regulated through parks planning standards, which set forth requirements for dedication of open space, or payment of in-lieu fees, in conjunction with new development. In 1996, the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) published the Park, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines. In addition, the NRPA has published best practice guidelines for planning, designing, and implementing green infrastructure in parks, financing green infrastructure projects, and safe routes to parks as well as other resource guidelines that can be used as reference by recreation planning agencies. The guidelines are used by many recreation planning agencies as a guide to develop their own standards for their service areas. These national standards serve as a guideline for measurement and are not designed to be considered absolute requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Gray Squirrel
    DRAFT Washington State Recovery Plan for the Western Gray Squirrel Mary J. Linders and Derek W. Stinson Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Program 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, Washington 98501-1091 May 2006 In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted procedures for listing and de-listing species as endangered, threatened, or sensitive and for writing recovery and management plans for listed species (WAC 232-12-297, Appendix B). The procedures, developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies, require preparation of recovery plans for species listed as threatened or endangered. Recovery, as defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is the process by which the decline of an endangered or threatened species is arrested or reversed, and threats to its survival are neutralized, so that its long-term survival in nature can be ensured. This is the Draft Washington State Recovery Plan for the Western Gray Squirrel. It summarizes the historic and current distribution and abundance of western gray squirrels in Washington and describes factors affecting the population and its habitat. It prescribes strategies to recover the species, such as protecting the population and existing habitat, evaluating and restoring habitat, potential reintroduction of squirrels into vacant habitat, and initiating research and cooperative programs. Target population objectives and other criteria for reclassification are identified. As part of the State’s listing and recovery procedures, the draft recovery plan is available for a 90-day public comment period. Please submit written comments on this report by 15 August 2006 via e-mail to [email protected] , or by mail to: Endangered Species Section Manager Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 This report should be cited as: Linders, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Woodland Resource Assessment Report
    Butte County Oak Woodland Resource Assessment Report July 2006 Prepared by: Butte County Resource Conservation District Jeff Mott, CSU Chico Glenn Nader, UC Coop. Ext Anthea Maslin, CSU Chico Marissa Fierro, CSU Chico Table of Contents Butte County Oak Woodland Resource Assessment Report 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Goals of WCB Program 3.0 Assessment of Existing Data 3.1 Habitat Associations 3.2 Current Acreage 3.3 Ownership Patterns 3.4 Oak Species and Distribution in Butte County 3.4.1 Valley Oak 3.4.2 Blue Oak 3.4.3 Black Oak 3.4.4 Interior Live Oak 3.4.5 Oracle Oak 3.4.6 Canyon Oak 3.4.7 Scrub Oak 3.4.8 Pests and Pathogens 4.0 Conservation Goals and Policies 4.1 Work Cooperatively with Private Land Owners 4.2 Encourage Habitat Conservation 4.3 Restore Degraded Oak Woodlands 4.4 Education and Research 5.0 Additional Information Needed 6.0 References 2 1.0 Introduction Butte County supports significant acreage of oak woodland habitat. The historical importance of oaks is apparent in the names of towns, cities, streets and residential complexes throughout California. Butte County’s oak woodlands enhance the natural and scenic beauty of the area, provide forage and shelter for more than 300 species of wildlife, facilitate nutrient cycling, moderate temperature extremes, reduce soil erosion, sustain water quality and increase the monetary and ecological value of property. Contiguous oak woodland habitat is being lost throughout California through residential, commercial and industrial development, conversion to intensive agricultural development such as orchards and vineyards, woodcutting and a lack of regeneration in specific oak species.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Bidwell Park Resource Inventory
    A RESOURCE INVENTORY OF UUPPPPEERR BBIIDDWWEELLLL PPAARRKK EXPANSION AREA Prepared for: City of Chico, Parks Department 411 Main Street Chico, California 95927 Contact: Mr. Dennis Beardsley Park Director Prepared by: California State University Research Foundation Chico, California 95929 Contact: Terri Lee Eagan Project Manager August 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Assessment Purpose ..........................................................................................1 1.2 Environmental Setting........................................................................................1 1.3 Methods...........................................................................................................2 1.3.1 Field Reconnaissance.............................................................................2 1.3.2 Plant Communities ................................................................................2 1.3.3 Wetlands...............................................................................................3 1.3.4 Wildlife Inventory .................................................................................3 1.3.5 Geographical Information System ..........................................................3 Section 2.0 Results – Inventory of Existing Conditions 2.1 Soils .................................................................................................................4 2.2 Plant Communities ............................................................................................4 2.2.1
    [Show full text]