DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for Bridges Over Degrading and Migrating Streams, Part 1: Synthesis of Existing Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. TX-01/2105-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date GUIDELINES FOR BRIDGES OVER DEGRADING AND January 2001 MIGRATING STREAMS. PART 1: SYNTHESIS OF EXISTING 6. Performing Organization Code KNOWLEDGE 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jean-Louis Briaud, Hamn-Ching Chen, Billy Edge, Siyoung Park, and Report 2105-2 Adil Shah 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 7-2105 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Construction Division Sept. 1999 – Aug. 2000 Research and Technology Transfer Section 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 5080 Austin Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation. Research Project Title: Develop Guidance for Design of New Bridges and Mitigation of Existing Sites in Severely Degrading and Migrating Streams 16. Abstract This report is a collection of existing knowledge on the following topics: prediction of meander migration rate and stream bed degradation rate, and countermeasures for mitigating meander migration and stream bed degradation. Based on existing knowledge, two main conclusions were reached on the prediction of meander migration and stream bed degradation: 1. There is no reliable formula to predict these erosion movements. 2. The best existing way to predict such erosion movements is by extrapolation of historical data. Based also on existing knowledge, three main conclusions were drawn on the countermeasures for mitigating meander migration and stream bed degradation: 1. There are a large number of countermeasures to choose from. 2. There is no scientific basis for choosing the right countermeasure for a given case. 3. The best current practice is based on local experience and trial and error approach. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Meander Migration, Stream Bed Degradation, Bank No Restrictions. This document is available to the Erosion, Rate of Movement Prediction, public through NTIS: Countermeasures National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Classif.(of this report) 20. Security Classif.(of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 194 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized GUIDELINES FOR BRIDGES OVER DEGRADING AND MIGRATING STREAMS. PART 1: SYNTHESIS OF EXISTING KNOWLEDGE by Jean-Louis Briaud Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Hamn-Ching Chen Associate Professor Texas A&M University Billy Edge Professor Texas A&M University Siyoung Park and Adil Shah Graduate Students Texas A&M University Report 2105-2 Project Number 0-2105 Research Project Title: Develop Guidance for Design of New Bridges and Mitigation of Existing Sites in Severely Degrading and Migrating Streams Sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation January 2001 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. In addition, the above assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The engineer in charge of the project was Dr. Jean-Louis Briaud, P.E. # 48690. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was sponsored by the Texas Department of Transportation. The project director and chairman of the Project Monitoring Committee was Tom Dahl, who struck a very appreciated balance between listening to the researchers’ concerns and maintaining the best interest of TxDOT. Mr. Dahl took a very active part in the research process and visited several of the case history sites. It was a pleasure to work with him. The program coordinator was Tony Schneider whose vision over the last six years has helped put TxDOT at the forefront of scour knowledge. He is succeeded by David Stolpa who has already helped the research team on several occasions. The RMC 3 staff engineer in the Construction Division Research, Technology, and Transfer Section was William Knowles. The Project Monitoring Committee was composed of Rocky Armendariz, Robert Balfour, Kathy Dyer, Elston Eckhardt, Gerald Freytag, Donald Harley, Mark McClelland, and Wendy Worthey. We appreciate their support and their constructive criticisms. We also wish to extend special thanks to the TxDOT engineers who guided our five site visits: Kathy Dyer and Scott Shannon for the visit in the Paris District, Jerry Freytag for the visit in the Yokum district, Pat Williams and Terry Paholek of the Bryan District, John Kilgore of the San Antonio District, and Robert Balfour of the Beaumont District. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................... xviii 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 1.1 What?...........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Why?............................................................................................................................1 1.3 How?............................................................................................................................1 1.4 Where, When, by Whom, and for Whom? ..................................................................1 1.5 Organization of the Report ..........................................................................................2 2. RIVER PATTERNS AND STABILITY.....................................................................................3 2.1 Channel Classification ................................................................................................3 2.2 Lane Relation..............................................................................................................7 2.3 River Metamorphosis..................................................................................................8 3. MEANDER MIGRATION........................................................................................................11 3.1 Bank Erosion............................................................................................................11 3.2 Meander Growth and Shift ......................................................................................11 3.3 Cutoffs .....................................................................................................................12 3.4 Avulsion...................................................................................................................13 4. DEGRADATION AND AGGRADATION .............................................................................15 4.1 Aggradation ..............................................................................................................15 4.2 Backfilling and Downfilling .....................................................................................15 4.3 Nickpoint Migration .................................................................................................16 4.4 Degradation and Scour..............................................................................................16 5. RAPID CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT METHOD.................................................19 5.1 Stream Reconnaissance and Field Inspection...........................................................19 5.2 Remote Sensing Techniques (Aerial Photographs) ..................................................19 6. PREDICTION OF MEANDER MIGRATION………………………………………………. 21 6.1 Begin, Z.B., 1981, “Stream Curvature and Bank Erosion: A Model Based on the Momentum Equation.”....................................................................................21 6.2 Begin, A.B., 1986, “Curvature Ration and Ratio of River Bend Migration Update.” .....................................................................................................................21 6.3 Brice, J. C., 1982, “Stream Channel Stability Assessment.”.....................................24 6.4 Chang, H. H., 1984, “Analysis of River Meanders.”.................................................26 6.5 Chang, T. P., Toebes, G. H., 1980, “Geometric Parameters for Alluvial Rivers Related to Regional Geology.”......................................................................27 6.6 Chitale, S. V., 1980, “Shape and Mobility of River Meanders.”...............................28 6.7 Comes, B. M., 1990, “Identification Techniques for Bank Erosion and Failure Processes.”....................................................................................................29 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 6.8 Diehl, T. H., and Bryan, B. A., 1993, “Supply of Large Woody Debris in a Stream Channel.”......................................................................................................30
Recommended publications
  • Flow Regime Transition in Countercurrent Packed Column Monitored by ECT

    Flow Regime Transition in Countercurrent Packed Column Monitored by ECT

    Flow Regime Transition in Countercurrent Packed Column Monitored by ECT Zhigang Li, Yuan Chen, Yunjie Yang, Chang Liu, Mathieu Lucquiaud and Jiabin Jia* School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, EH9 3JL [email protected] Abstract Vertical packed columns are widely used in absorption, stripping and distillation processes. Flooding will occur in the vertical packed columns as a result of excessive liquid accumulation, which reduces mass transfer efficiency and causes a large pressure drop. Pressure drop measurements are typically used as the hydrodynamic parameter for predicting flooding. They are, however, only indicative of the occurrence of transition of the flow regime across the packed column. They offer limited spatial information to mass transfer packed column operators and designers. In this work, a new method using Electrical Capacitance Tomography (ECT) is implemented for the first time so that real-time flow regime monitoring at different vertical positions is achieved in a countercurrent packed bed column using ECT. Two normalisation methods are implemented to monitor the transition from pre-loading to flooding in a column of 200 mm diameter, 1200 mm height filled with plastic structured packing. Liquid distribution in the column can be qualitatively visualised via reconstructed ECT images. A flooding index is implemented to quantitatively indicate the progression of local flooding. In experiments, the degree of local flooding is quantified at various gas flow rates and locations of ECT sensor. ECT images were compared with pressure drop and visual observation. The experimental results demonstrate that ECT is capable of monitoring liquid distribution, identifying flow regime transitions and predicting local flooding.
  • River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources

    River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources

    River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Overview In the discussion of river, or fluvial systems, and the strategies that may be used in the management of fluvial systems, it is important to have a basic understanding of the fundamental principals of how river systems work. This fact sheet will illustrate how sediment moves in the river, and the general response of the fluvial system when changes are imposed on or occur in the watershed, river channel, and the sediment supply. The Working River The complex river network that is an integral component of Vermont’s landscape is created as water flows from higher to lower elevations. There is an inherent supply of potential energy in the river systems created by the change in elevation between the beginning and ending points of the river or within any discrete stream reach. This potential energy is expressed in a variety of ways as the river moves through and shapes the landscape, developing a complex fluvial network, with a variety of channel and valley forms and associated aquatic and riparian habitats. Excess energy is dissipated in many ways: contact with vegetation along the banks, in turbulence at steps and riffles in the river profiles, in erosion at meander bends, in irregularities, or roughness of the channel bed and banks, and in sediment, ice and debris transport (Kondolf, 2002). Sediment Production, Transport, and Storage in the Working River Sediment production is influenced by many factors, including soil type, vegetation type and coverage, land use, climate, and weathering/erosion rates.
  • Stream Restoration, a Natural Channel Design

    Stream Restoration, a Natural Channel Design

    Stream Restoration Prep8AICI by the North Carolina Stream Restonltlon Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant INC STATE UNIVERSITY I North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T State University commit themselves to positive action to secure equal opportunity regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age or disability. In addition, the two Universities welcome all persons without regard to sexual orientation. Contents Introduction to Fluvial Processes 1 Stream Assessment and Survey Procedures 2 Rosgen Stream-Classification Systems/ Channel Assessment and Validation Procedures 3 Bankfull Verification and Gage Station Analyses 4 Priority Options for Restoring Incised Streams 5 Reference Reach Survey 6 Design Procedures 7 Structures 8 Vegetation Stabilization and Riparian-Buffer Re-establishment 9 Erosion and Sediment-Control Plan 10 Flood Studies 11 Restoration Evaluation and Monitoring 12 References and Resources 13 Appendices Preface Streams and rivers serve many purposes, including water supply, The authors would like to thank the following people for reviewing wildlife habitat, energy generation, transportation and recreation. the document: A stream is a dynamic, complex system that includes not only Micky Clemmons the active channel but also the floodplain and the vegetation Rockie English, Ph.D. along its edges. A natural stream system remains stable while Chris Estes transporting a wide range of flows and sediment produced in its Angela Jessup, P.E. watershed, maintaining a state of "dynamic equilibrium." When Joseph Mickey changes to the channel, floodplain, vegetation, flow or sediment David Penrose supply significantly affect this equilibrium, the stream may Todd St. John become unstable and start adjusting toward a new equilibrium state.
  • Logistic Analysis of Channel Pattern Thresholds: Meandering, Braiding, and Incising

    Logistic Analysis of Channel Pattern Thresholds: Meandering, Braiding, and Incising

    Geomorphology 38Ž. 2001 281–300 www.elsevier.nlrlocatergeomorph Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: meandering, braiding, and incising Brian P. Bledsoe), Chester C. Watson 1 Department of CiÕil Engineering, Colorado State UniÕersity, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA Received 22 April 2000; received in revised form 10 October 2000; accepted 8 November 2000 Abstract A large and geographically diverse data set consisting of meandering, braiding, incising, and post-incision equilibrium streams was used in conjunction with logistic regression analysis to develop a probabilistic approach to predicting thresholds of channel pattern and instability. An energy-based index was developed for estimating the risk of channel instability associated with specific stream power relative to sedimentary characteristics. The strong significance of the 74 statistical models examined suggests that logistic regression analysis is an appropriate and effective technique for associating basic hydraulic data with various channel forms. The probabilistic diagrams resulting from these analyses depict a more realistic assessment of the uncertainty associated with previously identified thresholds of channel form and instability and provide a means of gauging channel sensitivity to changes in controlling variables. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Channel stability; Braiding; Incision; Stream power; Logistic regression 1. Introduction loads, loss of riparian habitat because of stream bank erosion, and changes in the predictability and vari- Excess stream power may result in a transition ability of flow and sediment transport characteristics from a meandering channel to a braiding or incising relative to aquatic life cyclesŽ. Waters, 1995 . In channel that is characteristically unstableŽ Schumm, addition, braiding and incising channels frequently 1977; Werritty, 1997.
  • By Mary Katherine Matella a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philo

    By Mary Katherine Matella a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philo

    Floodplain restoration planning for a changing climate: Coupling flow dynamics with ecosystem benefits by Mary Katherine Matella A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Adina M. Merenlender, Chair Professor Maggi Kelly Professor G. Mathias Kondolf Spring 2013 Floodplain restoration planning for a changing climate: Coupling flow dynamics with ecosystem benefits Copyright 2013 by Mary Katherine Matella ABSTRACT Floodplain restoration planning for a changing climate: Coupling flow dynamics with ecosystem benefits by Mary Katherine Matella Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Adina M. Merenlender, Chair This dissertation addresses the role that dynamic flow characteristics play in shaping the potential for significant ecosystem benefits from floodplain restoration. Mediterranean-climate river systems present challenges for restoring healthy floodplains because of the inter and intra- annual variability in stream flow, which has been dramatically reduced in an effort to control flooding and to provide a more consistent year-round water supply for human use. Habitat restoration efforts require that this reduced stream flow be altered in order to recover more naturally dynamic flow patterns and reconnect floodplains. This thesis defines and takes advantage of an eco-hydrology modeling framework to reveal how the ecological returns of different hydrologic alterations or restoration scenarios—including changes to the physical landscape and flow dynamics—influence habitat connectivity for freshwater biota. A method for quantifying benefits of expanding floodplain connectivity can highlight actions that might simultaneously reduce flood risk and restore ecological functions, such as supporting fish habitat benefits, food web productivity, and riparian vegetation establishment.
  • Comprehensive Drainage Study of the Upper Reach of College Branch in Fayetteville, Arkansas Kathryn Lea Mccoy University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Comprehensive Drainage Study of the Upper Reach of College Branch in Fayetteville, Arkansas Kathryn Lea Mccoy University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 Comprehensive Drainage Study of the Upper Reach of College Branch in Fayetteville, Arkansas Kathryn Lea McCoy University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Hydraulic Engineering Commons Recommended Citation McCoy, Kathryn Lea, "Comprehensive Drainage Study of the Upper Reach of College Branch in Fayetteville, Arkansas" (2012). Theses and Dissertations. 650. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/650 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE STUDY OF THE UPPER REACH OF COLLEGE BRANCH IN FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE STUDY OF THE UPPER REACH OF COLLEGE BRANCH IN FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering By Kathryn Lea McCoy University of Arkansas Bachelor of Science in Biological Engineering, 2009 December 2012 University of Arkansas ABSTRACT College Branch is a stream with headwaters located on the University of Arkansas campus. The stream flows through much of the west side of campus, gaining discharge and enlarging its channel as it meanders to the south. College Branch has experienced erosion and flooding issues in recent years due to increased urbanization of its watershed and increased runoff volume. The purpose of this project was to develop a comprehensive drainage study of College Branch on the University of Arkansas campus.
  • Image Analysis Techniques to Estimate River Discharge Using Time-Lapse Cameras in Remote Locations

    Image Analysis Techniques to Estimate River Discharge Using Time-Lapse Cameras in Remote Locations

    Image analysis techniques to estimate river discharge using time-lapse cameras in remote locations David S. Young1, Jane K. Hart2, Kirk Martinez1 1 – Electronics and Computer Science, 2 – Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] NOTICE: This is the authors’ version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers & Geosciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers & Geosciences, 76, 1-10 (2015) doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.11.008 Abstract Cameras have the potential to provide new data streams for environmental science. Improvements in image quality, power consumption and image processing algorithms mean that it is now possible to test camera-based sensing in real-world scenarios. This paper presents an 8-month trial of a camera to monitor discharge in a glacial river, in a situation where this would be difficult to achieve using methods requiring sensors in or close to the river, or human intervention during the measurement period. The results indicate diurnal changes in discharge throughout the year, the importance of subglacial winter water storage, and rapid switching from a “distributed” winter system to a “channelised” summer drainage system in May. They show that discharge changes can be measured with an accuracy that is useful for understanding the relationship between glacier dynamics and flow rates.
  • Chapter 4: Land Degradation

    Chapter 4: Land Degradation

    Final Government Distribution Chapter 4: IPCC SRCCL 1 Chapter 4: Land Degradation 2 3 Coordinating Lead Authors: Lennart Olsson (Sweden), Humberto Barbosa (Brazil) 4 Lead Authors: Suruchi Bhadwal (India), Annette Cowie (Australia), Kenel Delusca (Haiti), Dulce 5 Flores-Renteria (Mexico), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Esteban Jobbagy (Argentina), Werner Kurz 6 (Canada), Diqiang Li (China), Denis Jean Sonwa (Cameroon), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom) 7 Contributing Authors: Timothy Crews (The United States of America), Martin Dallimer (United 8 Kingdom), Joris Eekhout (The Netherlands), Karlheinz Erb (Italy), Eamon Haughey (Ireland), 9 Richard Houghton (The United States of America), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Francis X. 10 Johnson (The United States of America), Woo-Kyun Lee (The Republic of Korea), John Morton 11 (United Kingdom), Felipe Garcia Oliva (Mexico), Jan Petzold (Germany), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), 12 Florence Renou-Wilson (Ireland), Anna Tengberg (Sweden), Louis Verchot (Colombia/The United 13 States of America), Katharine Vincent (South Africa) 14 Review Editors: José Manuel Moreno Rodriguez (Spain), Carolina Vera (Argentina) 15 Chapter Scientist: Aliyu Salisu Barau (Nigeria) 16 Date of Draft: 07/08/2019 17 Subject to Copy-editing 4-1 Total pages: 186 Final Government Distribution Chapter 4: IPCC SRCCL 1 2 Table of Contents 3 Chapter 4: Land Degradation ......................................................................................................... 4-1 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................
  • Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development

    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development

    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development River Characteristics - Sediment Transport - River Velocity - Terminology The illustrations below represent the 3 general classifications into which rivers are placed according to specific characteristics. These categories are: Youthful, Mature and Old Age. A Rejuvenated River, one with a gradient that is raised by the earth's movement, can be an old age river that returns to a Youthful State, and which repeats the cycle of stages once again. A brief overview of each stage of river development begins after the images. A list of pertinent vocabulary appears at the bottom of this document. You may wish to consult it so that you will be aware of terminology used in the descriptive text that follows. Characteristics found in the 3 Stages of River Development: L. Immoor 2006 Geoteach.com 1 Youthful River: Perhaps the most dynamic of all rivers is a Youthful River. Rafters seeking an exciting ride will surely gravitate towards a young river for their recreational thrills. Characteristically youthful rivers are found at higher elevations, in mountainous areas, where the slope of the land is steeper. Water that flows over such a landscape will flow very fast. Youthful rivers can be a tributary of a larger and older river, hundreds of miles away and, in fact, they may be close to the headwaters (the beginning) of that larger river. Upon observation of a Youthful River, here is what one might see: 1. The river flowing down a steep gradient (slope). 2. The channel is deeper than it is wide and V-shaped due to downcutting rather than lateral (side-to-side) erosion.
  • Floodplain Heterogeneity and Meander Migration

    Floodplain Heterogeneity and Meander Migration

    River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics: RCEM2011 © 2011 Floodplain heterogeneity and meander migration MOTTA Davide Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABAD Jorge D. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA E-mail: [email protected] LANGENDOEN Eddy J. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, USA E-mail: [email protected] GARCIA Marcelo H. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The impact of horizontal heterogeneity of floodplain soils on rates and patterns of meander migration is analyzed with a Ikeda et al. (1981)-type model for hydrodynamics and bed morphodynamics, coupled with a physically-based bank erosion model according to the approach developed by Motta et al. (2011). We assume that rates of migration are determined by the resistance to hydraulic erosion of the soils, which is described by an excess shear stress relation. This relation uses two parameters characterizing the resistance to erosion: critical shear stress and erodibility coefficient. The spatial distribution of critical shear stress in the floodplain is generated on a regular grid with varying degree of randomness to mimic natural settings and the corresponding erodibility coefficient is computed with a relation derived from field-measured pairs of critical shear stress and erodibility. Centerline migration and associated statistics for randomly-disturbed distribution based on the distance from the valley axis are compared for sine-generated centerline using the Monte Carlo method.
  • Land Degradation

    Land Degradation

    SPM4 Land degradation Coordinating Lead Authors: Lennart Olsson (Sweden), Humberto Barbosa (Brazil) Lead Authors: Suruchi Bhadwal (India), Annette Cowie (Australia), Kenel Delusca (Haiti), Dulce Flores-Renteria (Mexico), Kathleen Hermans (Germany), Esteban Jobbagy (Argentina), Werner Kurz (Canada), Diqiang Li (China), Denis Jean Sonwa (Cameroon), Lindsay Stringer (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors: Timothy Crews (The United States of America), Martin Dallimer (United Kingdom), Joris Eekhout (The Netherlands), Karlheinz Erb (Italy), Eamon Haughey (Ireland), Richard Houghton (The United States of America), Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal (Pakistan), Francis X. Johnson (The United States of America), Woo-Kyun Lee (The Republic of Korea), John Morton (United Kingdom), Felipe Garcia Oliva (Mexico), Jan Petzold (Germany), Mohammad Rahimi (Iran), Florence Renou-Wilson (Ireland), Anna Tengberg (Sweden), Louis Verchot (Colombia/ The United States of America), Katharine Vincent (South Africa) Review Editors: José Manuel Moreno (Spain), Carolina Vera (Argentina) Chapter Scientist: Aliyu Salisu Barau (Nigeria) This chapter should be cited as: Olsson, L., H. Barbosa, S. Bhadwal, A. Cowie, K. Delusca, D. Flores-Renteria, K. Hermans, E. Jobbagy, W. Kurz, D. Li, D.J. Sonwa, L. Stringer, 2019: Land Degradation. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press.
  • Sediment-Triggered Meander Deformation in the Amazon Basin

    Sediment-Triggered Meander Deformation in the Amazon Basin

    Sediment-triggered meander deformation in the Amazon Basin Joshua Ahmed, José A. Constantine & Thomas Dunne 1 Jose A. Constantine, Thomas Dunne, Carl Legleiter & Eli D. Lazarus Sediment and long-term channel and floodplain evolution across the Amazon Basin 2 Meandering rivers & their importance 3 Controls on meander migration • Curvature • Discharge • Floodplain composition • Vegetation • Sediment? 4 Alluvial sediment • The substrate transported through our river systems • The substrate that builds numerous bedforms, the bedforms that create habitats, the same material that creates the floodplains on which we build and extract our resources. Yet there is supposedly no real connection between this and channel morphodynamics? 5 6 7 Study site: Amazon Basin 8 9 What we did • methods 10 Results 11 Results 12 Results 13 Results 14 Results 15 Proposed mechanisms 16 Summary • Rivers with high sediment supplies migrate more and generate more cutoffs • Greater populations of oxbow lakes (created by cutoffs) mean larger voids in the floodplain • Greater numbers of voids mean more potential sediment accommodation space (to be occupied by fines) • DAMS – connectivity • Rich diversity of habitats 17 36,139 ha Dam, Maderia Finer and Olexy, 2015, New dams on the Maderia River 18 For further information 19 For more information Ahmed et al. In prep i.e., coming soon… to a journal near you 20 References • Constantine, J. A. and T. Dunne (2008). "Meander cutoff and the controls on the production of oxbow lakes." Geology 36(1): 23-26. • Dietrich, W. E., et al. (1979). "Flow and Sediment Transport in a Sand Bedded Meander." The Journal of Geology 87(3): 305-315.