DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 4 -- Transportation and Circulation Chapter 4--Transportation and Circulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 4 -- Transportation and Circulation Chapter 4--Transportation and Circulation Chapter 4 -- Transportation and Circulation Chapter 4--Transportation and Circulation 4.1 Introduction and Intent..................................................................................................................4-1 4.1.1 Coordination of Land Use and Circulation......................................................................4-1 4.2 Circulation Planning .....................................................................................................................4-2 4.2.1 Merced’s Historic Circulation Planning ..........................................................................4-2 4.2.2 Opportunities and Challenges..........................................................................................4-4 4.2.3 Coordination of Circulation System Planning .................................................................4-4 4.3 Elements of the Circulation System..............................................................................................4-7 4.3.1 Regional Circulation System ...........................................................................................4-7 4.3.2 Functional Road Classifications and Design Standards...................................................4-9 4.3.3 Streets and Highways.....................................................................................................4-11 4.3.4 Public Transportation Services ......................................................................................4-15 4.3.5 Private Transportation....................................................................................................4-20 4.3.6 Social Service ................................................................................................................4-20 4.3.7 Rail Service....................................................................................................................4-22 4.3.8 Bicycle/Trail System......................................................................................................4-24 4.3.9 Pedestrian Circulation....................................................................................................4-27 4.3.10 Air Service .....................................................................................................................4-27 4.4 Circulation System Improvement Issues.....................................................................................4-28 4.4.1 Level of Service (LOS)..................................................................................................4-28 4.4.2 Parsons Avenue..............................................................................................................4-32 4.4.3 Collectors.......................................................................................................................4-35 4.4.4 Bear Creek Bridges........................................................................................................4-37 4.4.5 At-grade Railroad Crossings..........................................................................................4-37 4.4.6 Interchange Upgrades ....................................................................................................4-39 4.4.7 Transitways....................................................................................................................4-39 4.5 Transportation System Management ..........................................................................................4-40 4.6 Transportation and Circulation Goals, Policies, and Actions .....................................................4-41 4.7 Issues Requiring Further Study...................................................................................................4-69 4.7.1 Station Area Planning at High Speed Rail Station.........................................................4-69 4.7.2 Transit Oriented Development.......................................................................................4-69 4.7.3 Non-Motorized Transportation Plan..............................................................................4-69 4.7.4 Climate Action Plan Development ................................................................................4-70 4.7.5 Financing Circulation Improvements ............................................................................4-70 4.8 Appendix.....................................................................................................................................4-72 4.8.1 Functional Road Classifications and Design Standards.................................................4-72 4.8.2 Intersection Spacing and Design Standards...................................................................4-84 4.8.3 Needed Transportation Projects.....................................................................................4-88 4.8.4 Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Data .........................................................................4-88 4-0 Chapter 4 Transportation and Circulation 4.1 INTRODUCTION AND The goals and policies presented here are INTENT intended to coordinate transportation/ circulation with land use and other pertinent The Transportation & Circulation Chapter is areas of the General Plan, while promoting a State-required component of the Merced the efficient movement of people, goods and Vision 2030 General Plan. Circulation is services within the Merced area. The concerned with the movement of people and overall public benefit is twofold. The public goods through and around the City. enjoys a broader choice of realistic options Transportation is concerned with the means for circulating through the urban area. by which these movements are made. This Secondly, their trips are easier and more chapter addresses the City’s major road efficient. system, local street patterns, air facilities, bus and rail transit, and bicycle and 4.1.1 Coordination of Land Use and pedestrian facilities. The goal is to identify Circulation the most effective ways to plan for The Merced Vision 2030 General Plan circulation while enhancing the community contains land use policies aimed at and protecting the environment. concentrating higher residential densities and major trip destinations in the vicinity of State law recognizes that circulation and major roadways and public transit corridors. land use are especially related and Such corridors also offer the option of emphasizes a definite correlation between effective transit routes. these two required General Plan Elements. California Government Code Section 65302 Specific goals and policies linking land use requires Circulation Elements to identify: to transportation/circulation concerns are “...The general location and extent of found in various locations within this plan, existing and proposed major including the Land Use, Urban Expansion, thoroughfares, transportation routes, and Urban Design Chapters. terminals, and other local public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the The location and intensity of development Land Use Element...” has an effect on traffic levels in the surrounding area and on the City as a whole. Transportation engineers have developed 4-1 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Chapter 4--Transportation and Circulation several mathematical tools to monitor the However, with the passage of recent relationship between land use and the legislation designed to improve overall air transportation system. One tool is the traffic quality, including reduction of Greenhouse forecasting model. This model forecasts Gases produced by automobiles, and traffic volumes and simulates traffic significant increases in the cost of fuel, this conditions under future land use scenarios trend may be reversing based on a) estimates of traffic which will be generated by new development; b) streets 4.2.1 Merced’s Historic Circulation the traffic will use; c) and the amount of Planning new traffic the street system can ultimately accommodate. The City of Merced has grown dramatically in the past quarter century. The 1968 To evaluate the General Plan Land Use General Plan formally re-oriented proposed Plan, the City used a traffic model community growth from east-west to a developed by the Merced County north-south orientation. This change was Association of Governments (MCAG) for based upon significant environmental use in analyzing the effects of land use constraints as well as growth pressures. To development and roadway system this day, the City has a strong north-south improvements. The resulting roadway level growth pattern although some development of service capacity is summarized in the to the east and west has occurred in certain Appendix (Section 4.8.4). Major street areas. More growth to the east and west is projects contained in the 2007 MCAG proposed with this General Plan. Regional Transportation Plan (Tier 1), and roadway improvements that would be In 1997, certain features were incorporated constructed to support development of the into the Merced Vision 2015 General Plan. These features include: proposed land use plan are summarized in Table 4.1. The financing of these needed • a comprehensive system of arterial improvements is discussed in Section 4.7.5. streets in a one-half to one mile grid The resulting Circulation Plan (map) is system; shown in Figure 4.1. • an upgraded Highway 59 to serve as a beltway or “ring-road” to carry cross- 4.2 CIRCULATION PLANNING town traffic around established portions of the community; and, Historically people have tended to drive more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yosemite National Park Foundation Overview
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yosemite National Park California Contact Information For more information about Yosemite National Park, Call (209) 372-0200 (then dial 3 then 5) or write to: Public Information Office, P.O. Box 577, Yosemite, CA 95389 Park Description Through a rich history of conservation, the spectacular The geology of the Yosemite area is characterized by granitic natural and cultural features of Yosemite National Park rocks and remnants of older rock. About 10 million years have been protected over time. The conservation ethics and ago, the Sierra Nevada was uplifted and then tilted to form its policies rooted at Yosemite National Park were central to the relatively gentle western slopes and the more dramatic eastern development of the national park idea. First, Galen Clark and slopes. The uplift increased the steepness of stream and river others lobbied to protect Yosemite Valley from development, beds, resulting in formation of deep, narrow canyons. About ultimately leading to President Abraham Lincoln’s signing 1 million years ago, snow and ice accumulated, forming glaciers the Yosemite Grant in 1864. The Yosemite Grant granted the at the high elevations that moved down the river valleys. Ice Yosemite Valley and Mariposa Grove of Big Trees to the State thickness in Yosemite Valley may have reached 4,000 feet during of California stipulating that these lands “be held for public the early glacial episode. The downslope movement of the ice use, resort, and recreation… inalienable for all time.” Later, masses cut and sculpted the U-shaped valley that attracts so John Muir led a successful movement to establish a larger many visitors to its scenic vistas today.
    [Show full text]
  • Merced County Board of Supervisors Summary
    MERCED COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY ACTION MINUTES Regular Meeting TUESDAY, MAY 16, 2000 Closed Session – 9:00 a.m. Regular Meeting – 10:00 a.m. MERCED COUNTY GLORIA CORTEZ KEENE…..DISTRICT 1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING KATHLEEN M. CROOKHAM….DISTRICT 2 2222 “M” STREET JOE RIVERO…..DISTRICT 3 BOARD ROOM, THIRD FLOOR DEIDRE F. KELSEY….DISTRICT 4 MERCED, CALIFORNIA 95340 CHAIRMAN JERRY O’BANION…..DISTRICT 5 (209) 385-7366 Lydia A. Beiswanger, Chief Clerk GREGORY B. WELLMAN DENNIS MYERS COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER COUNTY COUNSEL All supporting documentation is available for public review in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors located in the County Administration Building, Third Floor, 2222 “M” Street, Merced, California, 95340 During regular business hours, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. (209) 385-7366 SCHEDULED ITEMS 9:00 A. M. CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR: It is the intention of the Board to meet in Closed Session pursuant to Section 54957.8 concerning a conference with County of Merced negotiators, Gregory Wellman-County Administrator and Bev Morse-Assistant County Administrator concerning negotiations with American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Units 4, 5, 6, and 8 CLOSED SESSION : It is the intention of the Board to meet in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, Subdivision (e): PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Human Services Agency Director 1 CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: It is the intention of the Board to meet in Closed Session concerning significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: One Case RECONVENED AT 10:00 A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of the Technical Review Board
    Regular Meeting of the Technical Review Board Merced County Association of Governments Transit Joint Powers Authority for Merced County Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority LOCATION Meeting will be held at: City of Gustine Council Chambers 352 Fifth Street Gustine, CA 95332 DATE Wednesday, June 9, 2021 TIME 8:30 A.M. Technical Review Board Members Stephanie Dietz, Chair City Manager of Merced Jim Brown CEO of County of Merced Doug Dunford City Manager of Gustine Darrell Fonseca City Manager of Dos Palos Jose Antonio Ramirez City Manager of Livingston Gary Brizzee Acting City Manager of Los Banos Lori Waterman City Manager of Atwater 001 Welcome to the Technical Review Board Meeting! AGENDA At least 72 hours prior to each regular Technical Review Board convening, a complete agenda packet is available for review on the MCAG website at www.mcagov.org. All public records relating to an open session item and copies of staff reports or other written documentation relating to items of business referred to on the agenda are on file at MCAG. Persons with questions concerning agenda items may call MCAG to make an inquiry regarding the nature of items described on the agenda. INTERPRETING SERVICES Interpreting Services are not provided at Technical Review Board (TRB) meetings unless requested at least three (3) business days in advance. Please contact Eva Garibay at (209) 723-3153 x 108 during regular business hours to request interpreting services. Servicios de interpreté no son ofrecidos en las juntas de Technical Review Board (TRB) de MCAG al menos que se soliciten tres (3) días de negoción antes de la junta.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 72 January 1950 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by San Francisco District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 26, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 EXPLANATION The index lists the stream-flow ana reservoir stations in the Pacific Slope Basins in California for which records have been or are to be pub­ lished for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Paren­ theses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Some drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record" breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the station was in operation on September 30, 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mariposa County Setting
    County of Mariposa General Plan – Volume I Countywide General Plan 1 THE MARIPOSA COUNTY SETTING This chapter of the General Plan lays out the County’s setting and projections for the future. 1.1 WHERE WE ARE he County of Mariposa is located in central California, adjacent to the San Joaquin Valley within the central Sierra Nevada. Mariposa County is surrounded by Tuolumne County on the north and east, Madera County on the south, and Merced and Stanislaus counties on the west (Figure 1-1). Mariposa County boundaries are approximately 25 minutes from Merced and one hour from the cities of Modesto, Madera, Sonora,T and Fresno. The Town of Mariposa is a little less than two hours from Fresno- Yosemite International Airport, three and one half hours from Oakland International Airport, four hours from Sacramento International Airport, and over four hours from San Francisco International Airport. Merced’s Amtrak train station is an inter-modal transfer point with the Yosemite Area Regional Transit System. Figure 1-1: Regional Map Page 1-1 County of Mariposa General Plan – Volume I Countywide General Plan 1.2 WHO WE ARE In January 2006 the California Department of Finance estimates that Mariposa County was home to 18,216 residents, up nearly six percent from the 2000 census, which was an increase of almost twenty percent from the 1990 census. At the build-out of the General Plan, the County analyzes a population potential of 28,000, which theoretically could be reached within the planning horizon of 2020 (Figure 1-2). The demographics of Mariposa County have not changed much between the 1990 census and 2000 census.
    [Show full text]
  • Merced River Hiking
    PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION Restoring, Enhancing and Sustaining Forests in California, Hawaii and the Pacific Islands Sierra National Forest Hiking the South fork of the Merced River Bass Lake Ranger District Originating from some of the highest ranges in Bicycles and horses are not allowed on the trail. As the Sierra, the Merced River begins its journey you meander along the trail, you will discover the from Mt. Hoffman and Tenaya Lake on the north, remains of the old Hite Mine that produced over $3 the Cathedral range on the east and the Mt. Ray- million in gold and a gold mining town that once mond area south of Yosemite. It has two stood on the banks of the river. Please remember branches: the main fork and the south fork. The that historic and prehistoric artifacts are not to be main fork flows through the Sierra National For- disturbed or removed as they are protected by est and Yosemite Valley. The South Fork flows law. Violators will be prosecuted. through Wawona, winding its way through the Sierra National Forest to Hite Cove where it joins DEVIL GULCH the main river at Highway 140. Road (3S02) to the South Fork of the Merced River. This section of the trail is 2.5 miles long and HITE COVE TRAIL fairly easy to hike. Dispersed campsites are at Devil A spectacular early spring wildflower display is Gulch, the river and Devil Gulch Creek both need to along the Hite Cove Trail from February to be forded in order to continue on the trail. Caution April, with over 60 varieties of wildflowers along during high water spring runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmet Transit Needs
    UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS FY 2020-2021 Analysis and Recommendations Report December 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Summary __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Unmet Transit Needs Process ___________________________________________________________________________ 5 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Transportation Services in Merced County ___________________________________________________________ 21 Unmet Transit Needs Assessment _____________________________________________________________________ 28 Appendix ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 43 UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT FY 2020-2021 Summary BACKGROUND Each year, pursuant to the California Transportation Development Act (TDA), the Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG), as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency and Metropolitan Planning Organization for Merced County, is required to identify any unmet transit needs that may exist in Merced County. Should any unmet transit needs be identified, a further determination must be made to establish whether those needs are “reasonable to meet.” In accordance with state law, TDA funds must be allocated first to unmet transit needs, which are found to be reasonable to meet, before any remaining funds can be allocated to local jurisdictions for non-transit purposes. At a minimum, the annual unmet transit needs
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Eir Merced County Enterprise Zone City of Atwater City of Dos Palos City of Gustine City of Livingston City of Los Banos City of Merced County of Merced
    DRAFT EIR MERCED COUNTY ENTERPRISE ZONE CITY OF ATWATER CITY OF DOS PALOS CITY OF GUSTINE CITY OF LIVINGSTON CITY OF LOS BANOS CITY OF MERCED COUNTY OF MERCED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO: 2006091037 MARCH 2008 DRAFT EIR MERCED COUNTY ENTERPRISE ZONE CITY OF ATWATER CITY OF DOS PALOS CITY OF GUSTINE CITY OF LIVINGSTON CITY OF LOS BANOS CITY OF MERCED COUNTY OF MERCED March 2008 Lead Agency: County of Merced 2222 M Street Merced, CA 95340 Contact Person: Robert A. Lewis Development Services Director Merced County Planning Phone: (209) 385-7654 Fax: (209) 726-1710 Consultant: 5110 West Cypress Avenue Visalia, CA 93277 Contact Person: Carolyn (Carri) Diltz, CEcD Phone: (559) 733-0440 Fax: (559) 627-2336 060403 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction........................................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Objectives ..............................................................................................................................ES-1 Project Description.............................................................................................................................ES-2 Alternatives to the Project..................................................................................................................ES-2 Potential Areas of Controversy and Issues to be Resolved................................................................ES-3 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures.................................................................................ES-4
    [Show full text]
  • Senate on ·Senator from Hhode !:;;Land [Mr
    CONGI~ESSIONAL RECOR,D-_ SENA1~ 5977. PoNT]. I am informed that if present tile Senator fr()m Dela- Robinson, Ark. Shortridge Stephens 'Van·en Sackett Simmons Swanson Watson ware would vote as I sball vote. I vote "uay." · Schall Hmith Trammell Weller The roll call was conduded. She(1tJartl Hmoot Tyson WilliamR - . -Mr. ASHURST. I have been requested to announce that the Sblpstead - Stan11cld Walsh Senator from Georgia [Mr. HARRIS] and the Senator from l\fr. ROlliNSON of Arl<an~as. I desire to announce that the Loui~iaua ["ZI'fr. RANSDELL] are detained from the Senate on ·senator from Hhode !:;;land [Mr. GEnuY] and the Senator from account of illness. Missouri [Mr. HEED] are detained from the Senate by illness. Mr, GILLETT (after having voted in the negative). I lutvc The VIUE PHESIDENT. :::jeyenty-nine Senators having an­ a general pair with the senior Senator from Alabama [J\fr. swered to their names, a quorum is present. UN-DERWOOD]. I transfer tllat pair to the Senator from New ORDER OF BUSINESS York [Mr. "r ADSWORTH] anrl let my vote stnnrl. Mr. McKI~;LLAH (after baving voterl in the negative). I 1\lr. ASHURST obtained the floor. have a pair with the ~en ior Senator from Ohio [Mr. 'VILLlS]. Mr. WAHREN. Mr. President, does the Senator rise to Howe•er, I am informed tbat he would -.;-ote as I have yoted, <liscu:;;s the unfinished business or the matter of the appropria­ so I allow my Yote to stand. tion bill, the con::-:irleration of whi<.:Il was interrnvted Hatur­ The result \Ya s announced-yens 15, nays 22, as follows: day night by the lack of n quorum? Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility and Connectivity Study Draft: August 19, 2009
    greater dos palos Mobility and Connectivity Study Draft: August 19, 2009 Prepared By: Local Government Commission Opticos Design, Inc. Sacramento, California Berkeley, California Greater Dos Palos Mobility and Connectivity Study A Report to the City of Dos Palos, and the Unincorporated Communities of Midway and South Dos Palos in Merced County August 19, 2009 Dos Palos City Staff Dos Palos City Council Dos Palos Planning Commission Darrell Fonseca, City Manager Michael Burns, Mayor Chris Laveglia Manuela Sousa Johnny Mays, Mayor Pro Tem Everett Younce Michael Smith Jim Kelley Ron Tucci 1546 Golden Gate Ave. Jerry Antonette Jim Kelley Dos Palos, CA 93620 Alice Thompson 209.392.2174 Merced County Association of Merced County Board of Supervisors Merced County Planning Commission Governments Jerry O’Banion, District 5 Mark Erecca, District 5 Jesse Brown, Executive Director Deirdre Kelsey Rudy Buendia Richard Green, GIS Manager Mike Nelson Cindy Lashbrook 369 West 18th Street John Pedrozo Jack Mobley Merced, CA 95340 Hubert Walsh Lynn Tanner 209.723.3153 Design Team Opticos Design, Inc. Local Government Commission Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin, Inc. Stefan Pellegrini, AICP, Principal Paul Zykofsky, Program Director Dan Burden, Director, Christopher Janson Josh Meyer, Project Manager Walkable Communities Jennifer Block Laura Podolsky, Project Assistant 33 E. Pine Street 1285 Gilman Street 1303 J Street, Suite 250 Orlando, Florida 32801 Berkeley, California 94706 Sacramento, California 95814 866.347.2734 510.558.6957 916.448.1198 Nelson\Nygaard Jeremy Nelson, Senior Associate 785 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94103 415.284.1544 Funding for this project provided by a Caltrans Community Based Planning Grant, and the California Endowment.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacation Planner Yosemite & Mariposa County Tourism Bureau
    YOSEMITE & MARIPOSA COUNTY VACATION PLANNER YOSEMITE & MARIPOSA COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU 866-425-3366 • YOSEMITEEXPERIENCE.COM COULTERVILLE Your Adventure Starts Here While the possibilities are endless to enjoy Yosemite National Park and the surrounding county, this guide will help HORNITOS you take it all in and ensure you make the most of your trip. Visit the must-sees, such as Half Dome and Yosemite Falls, experience Gold Rush history at one of the many museums, bike or hike the nearly endless paths and trails, or just take in the scenery at one of the many relaxing hotels, resorts, vacation rentals or B&B’s. … Happy traveling! 4 | VACATION PLANNER tuolumne meadows Tenaya LAKE YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK YOSEMITE VALLEY Foresta EL PORTAL Yosemite WEST BADGER PASS MARIPOSA GROVE HISTORIC HORNITOS mariposa FISH CAMP CATHEYS VALLEY YOSEMITEEXPERIENCE.COM | 5 Welcome to Adventure County Nestled among natural monuments, vineyards, and historic Gold Rush landmarks, Mariposa County, home to Yosemite National Park, is Adventure County! Located about 200 miles east of San Francisco, 300 miles north of Los Angeles and a little more than 400 miles northwest of Las Vegas, it is a must-see for any California tour itinerary. Alive with possibility, it’s a world-class destination for all seasons that inspires curiosity, refreshes the soul, and proves that you don’t need to be rich to live life to its fullest. The simple pleasures here are closer than you think—less than a tank of gas away for most Californians. There’s a lot to see, but this county is not just for viewing from a distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmet Transit Needs
    UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS FY 2018-2019 Analysis and Recommendations Report April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Summary __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Unmet Transit Needs Process ___________________________________________________________________________ 5 Existing Conditions _______________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Transportation Services in Merced County ___________________________________________________________ 21 Unmet Transit Needs Assessment _____________________________________________________________________ 28 Appendix ________________________________________________________________________________________________ 55 UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT FY 2018-2019 Summary BACKGROUND Each year, pursuant to the California Transportation Development Act (TDA), the Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG), as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency and Metropolitan Planning Organization for Merced County, is required to identify any unmet transit needs that may exist in Merced County. Should any unmet transit needs be identified, a further determination must be made to establish whether those needs are “reasonable to meet.” In accordance with state law, TDA funds must be allocated first to unmet transit needs, which are found to be reasonable to meet, before any remaining funds can be allocated to local jurisdictions for non-transit purposes. At a minimum, the annual unmet transit needs
    [Show full text]