Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease isolated from UK cattle R. Strong, S.A. La Rocca, G. Ibata, T. Sandvik

To cite this version:

R. Strong, S.A. La Rocca, G. Ibata, T. Sandvik. Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated from UK cattle. Veterinary Microbiology, Elsevier, 2010, 141 (3-4), pp.208. ￿10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.010￿. ￿hal-00570024￿

HAL Id: hal-00570024 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570024 Submitted on 26 Feb 2011

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript

Title: Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated from UK cattle

Authors: R. Strong, S.A. La Rocca, G. Ibata, T. Sandvik

PII: S0378-1135(09)00411-8 DOI: doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.010 Reference: VETMIC 4567

To appear in: VETMIC

Received date: 20-5-2009 Revised date: 18-8-2009 Accepted date: 4-9-2009

Please cite this article as: Strong, R., La Rocca, S.A., Ibata, G., Sandvik, T., Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated from UK cattle, Veterinary Microbiology (2008), doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.010

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. *Manuscript

1 Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated

2 from UK cattle

3

4

5

* 6 R. Strong, S. A. La Rocca, G. Ibata, T. Sandvik

7

8

9 Veterinary Laboratories Agency - Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB,

10 United Kingdom

11

12

13

14 *Corresponding author:

15

16 Telephone: +44 1932 34111

17 Telefax: +44 1932 347046

18 e-mail: [email protected]

19 [email protected]

20 21 Accepted Manuscript

1 Page 1 of 24 22 Abstract

23 Available empirical data on the natural occurrence of ruminant has shown that

24 bovine viral diarrhoea (BVDV) is nearly exclusively found in cattle, whereas both

25 border disease virus (BDV) and BVDV can be isolated from . During routine genetic

26 typing of RNA from UK cattle diagnosed as BVDV positive between 2006 and

27 2008, five samples that were classified as BDV positive yielded positive virus isolates in cell

28 cultures. The samples originated from animals that had shown signs typical for BVD.

29 Phylogenetic analysis of the bovine BDVs showed that two belonged to the BDV-1a group

30 and three to the BDV-1b group, thereby matching the genetic diversity seen for previously

31 described UK ovine BDVs. Antigenic typing with a set of monoclonal antibodies (MABs)

32 showed that all bovine BDVs lacked one or more epitopes conserved among ovine BDV-1

33 isolates, and that they had gained reactivity with at least one BVDV-1 specific MAB. Serial

34 passaging of two of the virus isolates in ovine cell cultures did not change the epitope

35 expression pattern. These findings suggest that the presumed natural resistance of cattle

36 against infection with BDV no longer holds. A consequence of this is that BVD diagnostic

37 assays should be checked for their ability to also detect BDV, and also highlights the need for

38 monitoring of the BDV status in sheep that may be in contact with cattle in areas with

39 organised BVD control programmes.

40

41

42 43 Accepted Manuscript 44 Keywords: Pestivirus; Border disease virus; Cattle; Genetic typing; Monoclonal antibody

2 Page 2 of 24 45 1. Introduction

46 Pestiviruses cause economically important diseases in domestic ruminants and pigs

47 worldwide. There are currently four recognized members of the genus Pestivirus, family

48 , three of which infect ruminants naturally; bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV)

49 1, BVDV-2 and border disease virus (BDV) (Thiel et al., 2005). Acute BVDV infection in

50 cattle can vary from sub-clinical infection to mild clinical disease with inappetence and

51 transient fever, or with more specific signs such as diarrhoea, respiratory or reproductive

52 dysfunction. Vertical transmission of virus in pregnant animals to their unborn young that can

53 result in abortion, mummification of the foetus, congenital defects, stillbirth or the birth of

54 persistently infected calves immunotolerant to BVDV (PI). PI animals have been shown to

55 excrete high levels of infectious virus in the absence of clinical disease. Identification of

56 persistently infected animals within the herd is obviously of great economic importance. The

57 presence of BVDV-1 infection in cattle has been detected worldwide. In contrast BVDV-2

58 infection has only been seen since the 1990s when it was detected in cattle in North America

59 (Pellerin et al., 2000). More recently, BVDV-2 isolates have been detected in Europe, Japan,

60 Korea and South America (Vilcek et al., 2001; Nagai et al., 2001; Flores et al., 2000).

61

62 Border disease is principally a disease of sheep that shares some of the characteristics of BVD

63 in cattle, but with more pronounced emphasis on reproductive disease such as abortion, and

64 birth of stillborn or mummified fetuses. It can also cause the birth of small weak lambs that

65 suffer with „hairy-shaker‟ syndrome named due to the hairy fleeces and tremors suffered by

66 the lambs (NettletonAccepted et al., 1992). Birth of PI animals Manuscript is common in sheep but more rare in

67 .

68

69 The Pestivirus genome consists of a single stranded positive-sense RNA of approx 12.3 kb in

70 length, encoding for a single open reading frame that is flanked by a 5‟ and 3‟ untranslated

71 regions (UTR). The genome codes for 4 structural proteins, the capsid (C) and three envelope

3 Page 3 of 24 rns 72 proteins (E , E1 and E2), plus several non-structural proteins (Thiel et al., 2005).

73 Phylogenetic studies generally classify virus isolates based on sequences generated from the

pro 74 5'-UTR or N . BDV isolates have been divided into six phylogenetic groups; BDV-1 has

75 been detected in sheep from the USA (Sullivan et al., 1997), the UK (Vilcek et al, 1997),

76 Australia (Becher et al., 1994) and New Zealand (Vilcek et al, 1998); BDV-2 in ruminants in

77 Germany (Becher et al., 2003); BDV-3 in Switzerland (Stalder et al., 2005) and Austria

78 (Krametter-Froetscher et al., 2007), BDV-4 in Spain (Valdazo-Gonzalez et al., 2007) and

79 BDV-5 and -6 in France (Dubois et al., 2008). Isolates from Turkey form a possible seventh

80 group, BDV-7, that remains to be fully characterised (Oguzoglu et al., 2008).

81

82 Historically pestiviruses were named after the animal host species they were isolated from.

83 However, the ability of interspecies transmissibility has been shown both naturally and

84 experimentally (Paton et al. 1995; 1997). For instance, BVDV also infects sheep, goats, wild

85 ruminants and pigs (Becher et al., 1997). In sheep, BVDV-1 has been detected in Germany,

86 Sweden, UK and the United States (Becher et al, 1994; Vilcek et al, 1997; Willoughby et al.,

87 2006) and BVDV-2 in sheep in Germany, UK and the US (Becher et al., 1995, Sullivan et al.,

88 1997, Vilcek et al., 1997). Conversely, classical swine fever virus (CSFV) has never been

89 isolated from naturally infected cattle, although an experimental study has shown cattle to be

90 susceptible to CSFV (Dahle et al., 1987).

91

92 Although BVDV is commonly seen in sheep there is very little evidence of natural infection

93 with BDV in cattle.Accepted One exception is the Australian Manuscript V/TOB isolate, which W.A. Snowdon

94 (1973) described as antigenically different from other bovine isolates, and that later was

95 genotyped as BDV by Becher et al. (1997). More recently, one case of BDV in cattle was

96 identified during routine testing in Austria as part of their BVDV control program (Hornberg

97 et al., 2009).

4 Page 4 of 24 98 During recent screening for exotic pestiviruses in UK cattle samples positive for BVDV

99 antigen, six cases were found to be BDV positive by TaqMan RT-PCR. Here we describe the

100 genetic and antigenic typing of five bovine BDV isolates from the UK.

101

102 2. Material and methods

103 2.1 Origin of BDV isolates

104 Three suspect BVD cases were identified as being caused by BDV by a routine TaqMan RT-

105 PCR genotyping as reported by Cranwell et al. (2007). Three further cases have tested

106 positive for BDV; one case in 2006 by RT-PCR of spleen tissue from an aborted foetus, and

107 in 2008 two more cases initially diagnosed as BVDV positive by antigen ELISA (Serelisa

108 BVD/MD Ag, Synbiotics, France) were typed as BDV positive by the TaqMan RT-PCR

109 (Table 1).

110

111 Information on the case histories and potential epidemiological links between cattle and sheep

112 on the farms where the isolates came from was obtained either by farm visits or sought from

113 the private veterinary surgeons attending the cases.

114

115 2.2 Virus isolation

116 Either plasma or clarified supernatant from homogenized tissue samples were set up for virus

117 isolation by inoculation onto pestivirus-free foetal bovine turbinate (fBT) cells, maintained in

118 minimum essential medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum proven free from

119 pestiviruses andAccepted pestivirus neutralizing antibodies. ManuscriptAfter a further virus passage on fBT cells,

120 samples were fixed and immunostained using an unconjugated pool of pan-pestivirus reacting

121 monoclonal antibodies (MABs) (WB103/WB105/WB112) and a peroxidase-linked secondary

122 mouse antibody as described by Paton et al. (1994).

123

5 Page 5 of 24 124 2.3 Genetic typing

125 RNA was extracted from infected fBT cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, UK) and RNA was

126 eluted in 100 l nuclease-free water. Reverse transcription (RT) was carried out using the

127 Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, UK) as per the manufacturer‟s

128 protocol. A 242-246 nucleotide (nt) fragment of the 5‟-UTR was amplified using primers

pro 129 324/326 (Vilcek et al., 1994) and Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, UK). The N gene was

130 amplified with primers 320F (5'-GCCTGATAGGGTGYWGCAGAG-3‟, forward) and

131 1040R (5'-TTYCCTTTCTTCTTYACCTGGTA-3‟, reverse). Sequencing reactions based on

132 purified amplicons were set up in both directions using both the PCR primers and the 356F /

133 1027R pair (Valdazo-Gonzalez et al., 2007) using a chain termination protocol based on

134 fluorochrome labeled dideoxynucleotides (Cogenics, UK). Assembled sequences were

135 aligned with matching sequences of BDV and BVDV reference strains using Clustal X

136 (Thompson et al., 1997). Transition/transversion ratios were calculated with Puzzle4

137 (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1997) and phylograms were calculated using components of the

138 PHYLIP package (Felsenstein, 1989). Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using the

139 maximum likelihood distance matrix method using 1000 replicates for calculation of

140 bootstrap values. Trees were drawn with TREEVIEW (Page, 1996) and edited with

141 Freelance Graphics. Nucleotide sequences of the new BDV strains have been submitted to

142 GenBank; accession numbers are given in Table 1.

143 144 2.4 Antigenic typingAccepted Manuscript 145 fBT cells infected with each virus isolate were acetone fixed and immunostained using a

146 selection of monoclonal antibodies (MABs) raised against different pestiviruses (BDV,

147 BVDV-1, BVDV-2 and CSFV) (Edwards et al., 1988; Edwards and Sands 1990; Paton et al.,

148 1994). The staining intensity was graded as negative, weak positive and strong positive with

149 staining of less than 50% of the monolayer also being recorded. Ten serial passages were

6 Page 6 of 24 150 carried out on two of the isolates using pestivirus-free sheep choroid plexus (SCP) cells

151 maintained in minimum essential medium containing 10% foetal bovine serum proven free

152 from pestiviruses and neutralizing antibodies to pestiviruses. Each passage was fixed,

153 immunostained and results recorded as described for the isolates grown in fBT cells.

154

155 3. Results

156 3.1 Case histories

157 The available case history information was variable. For the adult animals the presentation

158 was undistinguishable from typical signs seen in animals PI with low-virulent BVDVs (Table

159 1). Four of the cases came from farms that also kept sheep, but the degree of contact

160 appeared to have been variable. There was no record of recent border disease among the

161 sheep on any of the farms involved, nor any obvious signs of BVD in other cattle.

162

163 3.2 BDV isolates

164 A pestivirus was isolated from five of the six cases that had been recorded positive by RT-

165 PCR. The sixth sample remained negative after two virus isolation attempts with spleen

166 samples from the aborted foetus, probably due to the cytotoxicity of the available sample.

167 When cultured on fBT cells, all five BDV isolates viruses were of the non-cytopathogenic

168 biotype.

169

170 3.3 Genetic typing

171 The genetic analysisAccepted of partial 5‟-UTR sequences Manuscriptshowed that all five bovine BDV isolates

172 grouped with other UK ovine BDV-1 sequences. Three isolates clustered within the BDV-1b

173 viruses, together with isolate K1729/3 from 1987, whilst the other two isolates were allocated

174 to different clusters within the BDV-1a viruses (Fig. 1). Pairwise sequence comparison with

175 the closest matching ovine BDV 5'-UTR sequence showed between two to five nucleotide

176 substitutions, corresponding to sequence identities between 97.9 and 99.2 %. Within the

7 Page 7 of 24 177 group of bovine BDVs sequence identities ranged from 97.1 to 88.5 %. A partial 5'-UTR

178 nucleotide sequence (140 nucleotides) derived from a PCR amplicon of the virus isolation

179 negative case showed greatest similarity to that of isolate 1505744, but with a significantly

180 lower sequence identity (81%).

181

pro 182 Phylogenetic analysis based on full length N sequences resulted in the same classification

183 of the five bovine BDVs as obtained with the partial 5'-UTR sequences, but with much higher

184 bootstrap values (Fig. 2). Pairwise sequence identities for the group of bovine BDVs ranged

185 from 98.4 to 75.4 %, with the same order of sequence identity as seen for the partial 5'-UTR

186 sequences.

187

188 3.4 Antigenic typing

189 The five bovine BDV isolates were most similar to ovine BDVs by immunostaining, although

190 an unusual reactivity pattern was observed compared to the BDV reference strains (Fig. 3).

191 The otherwise broadly reactive BDV MAB WS381 failed to detect four of the five bovine

192 BDV isolates. Similarly, MAB WB160 did not recognise three of the bovine BDVs. Most of

193 the bovine BDVs were immunostained by MABs WB214, CA1, and CA39, which have been

194 known as BVDV-1 specific. In general, the staining intensity with the anti-BDV MABs was

195 more variable for the bovine BDVs than for the ovine BDVs. The immunostaining pattern of

196 the bovine isolate 1505744 was more similar to BDV reference strains than the other four

197 bovine BDVs.

198 Two of the bovineAccepted BDV isolates, 1062689 and Manuscript 1118212, were maintained for up to 10

199 passages on SCP cells to assess any changes in the MAB reactivity pattern. No change in the

200 MAB reactivity pattern was seen for either of these isolates (data not shown).

201

8 Page 8 of 24 202 4. Discussion

203 It has been well documented that BVDV not only infects cattle but also other members of the

204 Order Artiodactyla, whilst BDV has mainly only been found in small ruminants. This study

205 describes antigenic and genetic properties of the first BDVs isolated from UK cattle.

206 Previous in vivo transmission studies of BVDV between cattle and sheep showed host animal

207 dependent reversible changes in the MAB reactivity pattern (Paton et al., 1997). To avoid

208 artificial induction of an ovine antigenic profile, the cattle BDV isolates were maintained in

209 bovine cell cultures for the antigenic characterization. Although variable, the MAB reactivity

210 pattern of the cattle isolates revealed an antigenic profile most similar to ovine BDV

211 reference strains. The most striking exception was that nearly all the bovine BDVs expressed

212 the BVDV-1 specific WB214, CA1 and CA39 epitopes, which reside within the major

213 envelope protein E2. Interestingly, these epitopes were the only ones that were expressed

214 exclusively in a bovine environment in the study by Paton et al. (1997). This may indicate

215 that the WB214, CA1 and CA39 epitopes are directed against cell surface receptors important

216 for replication in bovine, but not ovine cells. These changes, along with the general lower

217 reactivity against BDV specific MABs indicate that BDVs benefit from adapting

218 antigenically when shifting to a new host environment. However, this would not explain why

219 antigenic differences in non-structural proteins were seen – whilst the NS3 specific MAB

220 WB160 has been known to recognise most BVDV-1 and BDV isolates, three of the five

221 bovine BDVs were not immunostained with this MAB. The observation that the “bovine

222 MAB reactivity pattern” did not alter after 10 passages in ovine cell cultures is consistent

223 with the previouslyAccepted observed delayed reversion toManuscript an ovine antigenic pattern of a bovine

224 BVDV after transfer from cattle to sheep (Paton et al., 1997). This indicates that the antigenic

225 adaptation after host animal changes may be a clonal selection process that takes some time,

226 in the absence of immune selective pressure.

227

9 Page 9 of 24 228 Phylogenetic analysis showed that the bovine BDV isolates grouped together with previously

229 described UK ovine BDV-1 isolates (Vilcek et al 1997). This genetic classification is not

230 unlikely considering the expected continued field circulation of UK BDVs since they were

231 isolated 15-30 years ago. Based on the partial 5'-UTR sequences, the best sequence match for

232 the bovine BDVs was for the group of three BDV-1b‟s with a Scottish isolate obtained 20

233 years ago, whereas the remaining two bovine BDVs were allocated to two different groups of

pro 234 BDV-1a‟s. The same genotyping pattern was seen in the N based phylogram, with

235 sufficient statistical support to verify the 5'-UTR based classification. Direct comparison of

pro 236 N sequences of the bovine BDVs with their closest matches in the 5'-UTR phylogram was

pro 237 not possible since the latter N sequences were not available from GenBank. Interestingly,

238 the Australian V-TOB BDV isolate, reported to have originated from a case of acute mucosal

239 disease, and being antigenically distinct from contemporary BVDV isolates (Snowdon, 1973),

240 is also a BDV-1a, but genetically different from the bovine BDVs characterised in this paper.

241

242 Based on the relatively high genetic similarity of the isolates 1062689, 1502304 and 1505744,

243 it is possible that they might have emerged from the same parental virus strain, although the

244 differences in the MAB reactivity patterns did not support this. On the other hand, from the

245 more similar MAB profile of isolates 1118212 and 1376527 one might assume they are more

246 closely related than the bovine BDV-1b isolates, but the genotyping does not support this

247 either. However, it should be noted that the genetic typing is based on non-coding nucleotide

248 sequences, as opposed to antigenic properties that to a large extent reside in structural

249 glycoproteins involvedAccepted with host cell receptor binding. Manuscript

250

251 Recently a wide genetic diversity of BDV isolates has been described. Although all current

252 BDV reference strains belong to the BDV-1 cluster (Thiel et al., 2005), several new genetic

253 groups have now been described, most recently in southern Europe and around the

254 Mediterranean (De Mia et al., 2005; Thabti et al., 2005; Valdazo-Gonzalez et al., 2007;

10 Page 10 of 24 255 Dubois et al., 2008; Oguzoglu et al., 2009). To some extent there appears to be a

256 geographical bias in the distribution of BDVs in sheep. In the UK, BDV-1 is the only genetic

257 group that has been found (Vilcek et al., 1997), but this group has also been identified in

258 Australasia and the Americas. The genetic groups BDV-2 to -6 have only been described

259 regionally in Germany, Switzerland and Austria, Spain and France, respectively (Becher et

260 al., 2003; Stalder et al., 2005; Krametter-Froetscher et al., 2007; Valdazo-Gonzalez et al.,

261 2007; Dubois et al., 2008). Of these, only BDV-1 and BDV-3 have been isolated from cattle

262 in Australia, the UK, Italy and Austria (Snowdon, 1973; Cranwell et al., 2007; Schirrmeier et

263 al., 2008; Hornberg et al., 2009), and on each occasion the bovine BDV isolates were of the

264 common local genotype. Thus it seems like the BDV strain is less important than how sheep

265 and cattle are managed. A sufficiently close epidemiological contact between the two animal

266 species appears to be the most important risk factor for interspecies transfer. In the UK, sheep

267 and cattle are kept in relatively close contact on many farms, including the majority of the

268 cases investigated here. It is not unlikely that this also is a contributing factor to the high

269 prevalence of BVDV in sheep in the UK (Vilcek et al., 1997); if so, detection of BVDV in

270 sheep in other countries could be an indicator of likely presence of local BDVs in cattle as

271 well.

272

273 When a pestivirus is isolated from particularly a novel host animal, it is important to ensure

274 that the virus actually originated from the animal and is not a laboratory contamination. Cell

275 cultures and foetal calf serum used to supplement cell culture medium have frequently been

276 shown to be contaminatedAccepted with BVDV (Bolin et al.,Manuscript 1994; Sandvik et al., 1997; Schirrmeier

277 et al., 2004). This may be one explanation of the general high prevelence of pestivirus

278 infections worldwide, and also of some instances where the origin of sets of isolates has been

279 questioned (Vilcek et al., 1997; Vilcek and Paton, 2000). This potential problem can be

280 overcome by detection of pestiviruses by RT-PCR directly in original sample material, and

281 with identity confirmation by partial sequencing of PCR products. Following this approach,

11 Page 11 of 24 282 and demonstrating that the five bovine BDVs characterised in this study although genetically

283 distinguishable were allocated to three different phylogenetic clusters, it is highly likely that

284 BDV has jumped host species from sheep to cattle on at least three different occasions in the

285 UK. This route of infection is supported by the findings of Schirrmeier et al. (2008) and

286 Hornberg et al. (2009), who both also detected BDV-3 directly in blood samples by RT-PCR

287 and sequencing.

288

289 Detection of natural infection of cattle with BDV highlights the needs for BVDV diagnostic

290 tests that are able to detect all three ruminant pestiviruses; BVDV-1 and -2 as well as BDV.

291 The majority of the cases described here were originally diagnosed as BVDV antigen ELISA

292 positive, using an assay specific for the NS2-3 antigen. Being the most conserved of all

293 pestivirus proteins, NS2-3 is the most likely viral antigen to be detected by broadly reactive

rns 294 MABs. Recently BVDV antigen ELISAs targeting the E glycoprotein have become more

rns 295 popular. It may be difficult to know to what extent E ELISAs will detect bovine BDVs,

296 since the antigenic profile of the latter differed from BDV reference strains. Diagnostic RT-

297 PCR assays generally have a high sensitivity, and most assays targeting the 5‟-UTR by use of

298 Pestivirus generic primers should be able to amplify BDV cDNA, but it is important to ensure

299 that the fluorogenic detection probes in use also recognise BDV.

300

301 Lastly, from a disease control point of view, it would be of interest to assess to what extent

302 inactivated BVDV vaccines are able to provide immunoprotection against BDVs, of both

303 ovine and bovineAccepted origin. Since sheep previously have Manuscript been known to be infected with BVDV,

304 sheep should not be considered a greater risk for BVD control programmes after natural

305 infection of cattle with BDV has been described, since all domestic inter-ruminant contact

306 should be considered a risk for successful eradication of BVD.

307

308 5. Conclusion

12 Page 12 of 24 309 Molecular characterisation of five BDV-1s from naturally infected cattle has indicated that

310 they are likely to have jumped host species from sheep to cattle within the UK. These bovine

311 BDVs showed an antigenic profile differing from that of ovine BDVs, with lower reactivity to

312 BDV specific MABs, whilst they were expressing epitopes normally only seen in BVDV-1.

313 The previously assumed natural resistance of cattle against infection with BDV therefore no

314 longer holds.

315

316 Acknowledgements

317

318 Thanks to the following VLA veterinary investigation officers for following up and obtaining

319 case history data; M.C. Cranwell, C. Featherstone, K.L. Foyle, R. Hogg, P. Holmes, J.P.

320 Hutchinson, A. Otter and K. Whitaker. Also to J. Errington (VLA-Penrith) for the initial

321 identification of cases, and for providing partial sequence data for the virus isolation negative

322 case, to J. Peake (VLA Weybridge) for assistance with MAB typing, and DEFRA for funding

323 this work under research contract OD0345.

324

325 References

326

327 Becher, P., Avalos Ramirez, R., Orlich, M., Cedillo Rosales,.S., König, M., Schweizer, M.,

328 Stalder, H., Schirrmeier, H., Thiel, H.-J., 2003. Genetic and antigenic characterization of

329 novel pestivirus genotypes: implications for classification. Virology 311, 96-104.

330 Accepted Manuscript

331 Becher, P.,, König, M., Paton, D.J., Thiel, H.-J., 1995. Further characterization of border

332 disease virus isolates: evidence for the presence of more than three species within the genus

333 pestivirus. Virology 209, 200-206.

334

13 Page 13 of 24 335 Becher, P., Orlich, M., Shannon, A.D., Horner, G., Konig, M., Thiel, H.-J., 1997.

336 Phylogenetic analysis of pestiviruses from domestic and wild ruminants. J. Gen. Virol. 78,

337 1357-1366.

338

339 Becher, P., Shannon, A.D., Tautz, N., Thiel, H.-J., 1994. Molecular characterization of

340 border disease virus, a pestivirus from sheep. Virology 198, 542-551.

341

342 Bolin, S.R., Ridpath, J.F., Black, J., Macy, M., Roblin, R.. 1994. Survey of cell lines in the

343 American Type Culture Collection for virus. J. Virol. Methods. 48,

344 211-221.

345

346 Cranwell, M.P., Otter, A., Errington, J., Hogg, R.A., Wakeley, P., Sandvik, T., 2007.

347 Detection of Border disease virus in cattle. Vet. Rec. 161, 211-212.

348

349 Dahle, J., Liess, B., Frey, H.R., 1987. Transmission of pestiviruses between animal species:

350 experimental infection of swine with the virus of bovine virus diarrhea (BVD) and of cattle

351 with the virus of European swine fever (ESP). Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 94, 590-594.

352

353 De Mia, G.M., Greiser-Wilke, I., Feliziani, F., Giammarioli, M., De Giuseppe, A., 2005.

354 Genetic characterization of a caprine pestivirus as the first member of a putative novel

355 pestivirus subgroup.Accepted J. Vet. Med.. B: Infect. Dis. Vet. Manuscript Public Health 52, 206-210.

356

357 Dubois, E., Russo, P., Prigent, M., Thiéry, R., 2008. Genetic characterization of ovine

358 pestiviruses isolated in France, between 1985 and 2006. Vet. Microbiol. 130, 69-79.

359

14 Page 14 of 24 360 Edwards, S., Sands, J.J., 1990. Antigenic comparisons of hog cholera virus isolates from

361 Europe, America and Asia using monoclonal antibodies. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 97,

362 79-81.

363

364 Edwards, S., Sands, J.J., Harkness, J.W., 1988. The application of monoclonal antibody

365 panels to characterize pestivirus isolates from ruminants in Great Britain. Arch. Virol. 102,

366 197-206.

367

368 Felsenstein, J., 1989. Phylip phylogeny inference package (version 3.5c). Cladistics 5, 164-

369 166.

370

371 Flores, E.F., Gil, L.H., Botton, S.A., Weiblen, R., Ridpath, J.F., Kreutz, L.C., Pilati, C.,

372 Driemeyer, D., Moojen, V., Wendelstein, A.C., 2000. Clinical, pathological and antigenic

373 aspects of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) type 2 isolates identified in Brazil. Vet.

374 Microbiol. 77, 175-183.

375

376 Hornberg, A., Fernández, S.R., Vogl, C., Vilcek, S., Matt, M., Fink, M., Köfer, J., Schöpf,

377 K.. 2009. Genetic diversity of pestivirus isolates in cattle from Western Austria. Vet

378 Microbiol. 135, 205-213.

379

380 Krametter-Froetscher, R., Kohler, H., Benetka, V., Moestl, K., Golja, F., Vilcek, S.,

381 Baumgartner, W.,Accepted 2007. Influence of Communal Alpine Manuscript Pasturing on the Spread of

382 Pestiviruses among Sheep and Goats in Austria: First Identification of Border Disease Virus

383 in Austria. Zoonoses Public Health 54, 209-213.

384

15 Page 15 of 24 385 Nagai, M., Ito, T., Sugita, S., Genno, A., Takeuchi, K., Ozawa, T., Sakoda, Y., Nishimori,

386 T., Takamura, K., Akashi, H., 2001. Genomic and serological diversity of bovine viral

387 diarrhea virus in Japan. Arch. Virol. 146, 685-696.

388

389 Nettleton, P.F., Gilmour, J.S., Herring, J.A., Sinclair, J.A., 1992. The production and

390 survival of lambs persistently infected with border disease virus. Comp. Immunol.

391 Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15, 179-188.

392

393 Oguzoglu, T.C., Tan, M.T., Toplu, N., Demir, A.B., Bilge-Dagalp, S., Karaoglu, T., Ozkul,

394 A., Alkan, F., Burgu, I., Haas, L., Greiser-Wilke, I., 2009. Border disease virus (BDV)

395 infections of small ruminants in Turkey: A new BDV subgroup? Vet. Microbiol. 135, 374-

396 379.

397

398 Page, R.D.M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal

399 computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12, 357-358.

400

401 Paton, D.J., Carlsson, U., Lowings, J.P., Sands, J.J., Vilcek, S., Alenius, S., 1995.

402 Identification of herd-specific bovine viral diarrhoea virus isolates from infected cattle and

403 sheep. Vet. Microbiol. 43, 283-294.

404 405 Paton, D., GunnAccepted, M., Sands, J., Yapp, F., Drew Manuscript, T., Vilcek, S., Edwards, S.. 1997. 406 Establishment of serial persistent infections with bovine viral diarrhoea virus in cattle and

407 sheep and changes in epitope expression related to host species. Arch. Virol. 142, 929-938.

408

409 Paton, D.J., Sands, J.J., Edwards, S., 1994. Border disease virus: delineation by monoclonal

410 antibodies. Arch. Virol. 135, 241-252.

16 Page 16 of 24 411

412 Pellerin, C., Van Den Hurk, J., Lecomte, J., Tijssen, P., 1994. Identification of a new group

413 of bovine viral diarrhea virus strains associated with severe outbreaks and high mortalities.

414 Virology 203, 260-268.

415

416 Sandvik, T., Paton, D.J., Lowings, P.J., 1997. Detection and identification of ruminant and

417 porcine pestiviruses by nested amplification of 5' untranslated cDNA regions. J. Virol.

418 Methods, 64, 43-56.

419

420 Schirrmeier, H., Strebelow, G., Depner, K., Hoffmann, B., Beer, M., 2004. Genetic and

421 antigenic characterization of an atypical pestivirus isolate, a putative member of a novel

422 pestivirus species. J. Gen. Virol. 85, 3647-3652.

423

424 Schirrmeier, H., Strebelow, G., Tavella, A., Stifter, E., 2008. Border disease virus infection in

425 cattle: Epidemiological and diagnostic impact. Poster 5.2, The 7th ESVV Pestivirus

426 Symposium, Uppsala, Sweden, Sept. 16-19, 2008.

427

428 Snowdon, W.A., 1973. Mucosal Disease: its incidence and diagnosis in Australia. Bull. Off.

429 int. Epiz. 79, 529-542.

430

431 Stalder, H.P., MeierAccepted, P., Pfaffen, G., Wageck-Canal Manuscript, C., Rüfenacht, J., Schaller, P., Bachofen,

432 C., Marti, S., Vogt, H.R., Peterhans, E., 2005. Genetic heterogeneity of pestiviruses of

433 ruminants in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med. 72, 37-41.

434

435 Strimmer, K., von Haeseler, A., 1997. Likelihood-mapping: a simple method to visualize

436 phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6815-6819.

17 Page 17 of 24 437

438 Sullivan, D.G., Chang, G.J., Akkina, R.K., 1997. Genetic characterization of ruminant

439 pestiviruses: sequence analysis of viral genotypes isolated from sheep. Virus Res. 47, 19-29.

440

441 Thabti, F., Letellier, C., Hammami, S., Pepin, M., Ribiere, M., Mesplede, A., Kerkhofs, P.,

442 Russo, P., 2005. Detection of a novel border disease virus subgroup in Tunisian sheep. Arch.

443 Virol. 150, 215-229.

444

445 Thiel, H.-J., Collett, M.S., Gould, E.A., Heinz, F.X., Houghton, M., Meyers, G., Purcell,

446 R.H., Rice, C.M., 2005. Family Flaviviridae. In: Fauquet, C.M., Mayo, M.A., Maniloff, J.,

447 Desselberger, U., Ball, L.A. (Eds.), Virus Taxonomy. Classification and Nomenclature of

448 viruses. 8th ed. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 981-998.

449

450 Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F. and Higgins, D.G., 1997. The

451 ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by

452 quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 24, 4876-4882.

453

454 Valdazo-Gonzalez, B., Alvarez-Martinez, M., Sandvik, T., 2007. Genetic and antigenic

455 typing of border disease virus isolates in sheep from the Iberian Peninsula. Vet. J. 174, 316-

456 324.

457

458 Vilcek, S., Björklund,Accepted H.V., Horner, G.W., Meers, Manuscript J., Belák, S., 1998. Genetic typing of

459 pestiviruses from New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 46, 35-37.

460

461 Vilcek, S., Paton, D.J., 2000. A RT PCR assay for the rapid recognition of border disease

462 virus. Vet. Res. 31, 431-445.

18 Page 18 of 24 463

464 Vilcek, S., Paton, D.J., Durkovic, B., Strojny, L., Ibata, G., Moussa, A., Loitsch, A.,

465 Rossmanith, W., Vega, S., Scicluna, M.T., Palfi, V., 2001. Bovine viral diarrhoea virus

466 genotype 1 can be separated into at least eleven genetic groups. Arch. Virol. 146, 99-115.

467

468 Vilcek, S., Herring, A.J., Herring, J.A., Nettleton, P.F., Lowings, J.P., Paton, D.J., 1994.

469 Pestiviruses isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep can be allocated into at least three

470 genogroups using polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Arch.

471 Virol. 136, 309-323.

472

473 Vilcek, S., Nettleton, P.F., Paton, D.J., Belak, S., 1997. Molecular characterization of ovine

474 pestiviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 78, 725-735.

475

476 Willoughby, K., Valdazo-González, B., Maley, M., Gilray, J., Nettleton, P.F., 2006.

477 Development of a real time RT-PCR to detect and type ovine pestiviruses. J. Virol.

478 Methods. 132, 187-194.

Accepted Manuscript

19 Page 19 of 24 479 Table 1. Case history details of bovine border disease virus isolates characterised in this study.

480

481

Isolate Year County Clinical signs, age1 Contact with sheep Sample GenBank Accession no.

5'-UTR Npro

1062689 2006 West Yorkshire Diarrhoea / MD, 30 Not on farm of origin Blood EU887952 EU887957

1118212 2006 Clywd Diarrhoea / wasting, 12 Pet lambs Blood EU887953 EU887958

1376527 2007 Powys Neonatal death, 0 250 ewes on farm Thymus EU887954 EU887959

Buckinghamshir 1502304 2008 Diarrhoea / wasting, 15 2000 ewes on farm Blood EU887955 EU887960 e 1505744 2008 Durham Diarrhoea / wasting, 24 Sheep on farm Blood EU887956 EU887961

482

1 483 in months 484 Accepted Manuscript

20 Page 20 of 24 485 Figure legends

486

487 Fig. 1.

488 Phylogenetic tree constructed from partial 5‟UTR sequences (241-247 nucleotides) of five

489 UK bovine Border disease viruses (BDV) (bold & underlined typeface), BDV and Bovine

490 viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) reference strains (bold typeface), previously described UK

491 ovine BDVs (Vilcek et al., 1997), and representatives for other BDV genetic groups

492 (Valdazo-Gonzalez et al., 2007; Dubois et al., 2008). BVDV strain NADL was used as

493 outgroup species.

494

495 Fig. 2.

pro 496 Unrooted phylogenetic tree based on full N sequences (504 nucleotides) of five UK bovine

497 Border disease viruses (BDV) (bold & underlined typeface) plus representatives of other

498 BDV genetic groups as well as Classical swine fever virus, Bovine viral diarrhoea virus and

499 various other pestivirus.. Literature references to sequences not included in Fig. 1 have been

500 described in Valdazo-Gonzalez et al., (2007), plus in Dubois et al., (2008). The BDV-1

501 branch is reproduced at 200% scale for clarity.

502

503 Fig. 3.

504 Reactivity of MABs to bovine BDV isolates, ovine BVD isolates, BVDV-1 and BVDV-2.

505 MABs used were raised against various epitopes; anti-E2 (WS381, WS384, WB166, WB214,

rns 506 WH303); anti-EAccepted (WS363, WS368); anti-NS2/3 (WB160,Manuscript WA437, WA443). Black boxes

507 indicate positive reaction between the MAB and virus and a grey box indicates a weak or

508 partial positive reaction.

509

21 Page 21 of 24 Figure 1

1502304 UK-08

1062689 UK-06 K1729/3 UK-87

1505744 UK-08

G1305 UK-86 137/4 UK-87

V2377/12 UK-93 V2536/2 UK-93 BDV-1b 135 661 UK-86 53 V1414 UK-93

170 337 UK-87 88 100 Q1488/1 UK-90 63 A841/1 UK-80

D1586/2 UK-82 37 G2048 UK-86

V3196/1 UK-93 T1789/1 UK-80

T1802/1 UK-92

Moredun UK-80 74 A1870 UK-80

62 1118212 UK-06

1376527 UK-07

39 L991 UK-88 Q1673/2 UK-88 38 X818 AU-87 BDV-1a 37 36 JH2816 UK-85

80 BD31 US-78

80 5809 NZ-91 53 8320-31 NZ-90 42 AcceptedFrijters NL-95Manuscript

72 M3 ES-01 85-F-0488 FR-85 BDV-4, 5, 6 90-F-6335 FR-90

100 06-F-0083 FR-06 90-F-6227 FR-90 BDV-3 Reindeer DE-96 BDV-2 NADL US-62

0.1

Page 22 of 24 Figure 2

Hobi BR-00

CSFV

Paderborn Giraffe-1 KE-69 DE-96 SN1T TN-95 Alfort 187 FR-68 BM01 TN-95 PG-2 afr.-90?

712-02 IT-02 100 100 100

BDV-2 890 US-90 Reindeer-1 DE-96 100 17385 DE-00 81 BVDV-2 61 466/T DE-85

CH-BD1 CH- BDV-3 100 Osloss DE-65 88 100 06-F-0083 FR-06

55 BVDV-1 Gifhorn DE-99 89 100 84 F-488 FR-85 NADL US-62 BDV-5 F-5415 FR-89

BU-CRA22 ES-02 M3 ES-01 100 0.1 BDV-4 Chamois AD-02 F-7446-1 FR-94 F-6335 FR-90 BDV-6 100

100 Pronghorn US- 0.05 100

99 87/6 UK-87 137/4 UK-87 V2536 UK-94 T1802/1 UK-92 1376527 UK-07 1502304 UK-08 Moredun UK-76 L83-84 X818 1062689 UK-06 b AU-87 1118212 UK-06 V-TOB 1505744 UK-08 AU-73?

BD 31 US-78 a BDV-1

Accepted Manuscript

Page 23 of 24 Figure 3

Protein specificity: E2 E2 Erns Erns Erns Erns Erns NS2-3 E2 E2 E2 E2 NS2-3 NS2-3 NS2-3 E2 E2 NS2-3 NS2-3 E2 E2

MOREDUN Ovine BDV 137/4 isolates AVERYON

1062689

1118212 Bovine BDV 1376527 isolates 1502304

1505744

BVDV-1 C24V

BVDV-2 166312

MAB parental virus: BDV (87/6) BVDV-1: (NADL, 7443) BVDV-2: (VOSGES, 59386) CSFV (86/2) Accepted Manuscript positive staining faint staining no staining

Page 24 of 24