Perucci The+Trump+Is+Present.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perucci The+Trump+Is+Present.Pdf Performance Research A Journal of the Performing Arts ISSN: 1352-8165 (Print) 1469-9990 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rprs20 The Trump is Present Tony Perucci To cite this article: Tony Perucci (2017) The Trump is Present, Performance Research, 22:3, 127-135, DOI: 10.1080/13528165.2017.1348607 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2017.1348607 Published online: 21 Sep 2017. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rprs20 Download by: [Tony Perucci] Date: 21 September 2017, At: 05:37 The Trump is Present TONY PERUCCI 8 NOVEMBER 2016 YouTube even hosted videos that ‘proved’ THE DAY PERFORMANCE ART DIED Trump’s campaign to be ‘the greatest prank in the history of the world’, ‘the work of a gay On the day of the US presidential election, the scandanavian [sic] performance artist’ or ‘Andy daily literary humour website McSweeney’s Kaufman in disguise’, while one post-election Internet Tendency published a transcript of website announced Marina Abramović ‘to be the the ‘concession speech’ that Donald Trump mastermind behind “Donald Trump”, her most would give that night upon his anticipated controversial art project yet’ (‘mastermind’ 2017). loss to Hillary Clinton. The failed presidential The construct ‘performance art’ expressed the candidate would there reveal the secret that his desire of many not to believe in the actuality and election campaign – and even his entire life – resilience of Trump’s campaign, characterized by had actually been a work of performance art. outrageous and offensive statements, willingness (Over chants of ‘Donald!’ and ‘Lock her up!’ Trump to encourage white nationalism and violence pauses to smile and hold up his hand). and boasting about sexual assault, let alone I, Donald Trump, hereby concede … the his fantastical policy proposals. That Trump’s impossibility of meaning in the context of campaign – and now, presidency – could be for intertextual hegemony. Who’s with me? real has often simply seemed too impossible to (Awkward silence, murmurs of confusion.) believe. ‘Performance art’ emerged as a way to … discount this reality by proposing an alternative fiction: that his campaign, itself, was a fiction. When I was five years old, my father took me aside The last time performance art was so prevelant and explained that everything he had – his riches, in American political discourse, it was in context his power, his influence – it could all be mine. But on one condition: I was to privately commit of North Carolina Senator Jesse Helms and other Downloaded by [Tony Perucci] at 05:37 21 September 2017 1 my life to philosophy, feminism, and postmodern Republicans’ attacks on the NEA Four , the 1 Karen Finley, Tim Miller, critiques of American culture. But only in private. performance artists whose National Endowment John Fleck and Holly Hughes. Publicly, I was to cultivate a persona of an entitled, for the Arts (NEA) grants were vetoed in 1990 for narcissistic demagogue, formed as a decades-long their ‘immorality’. With images of Finley and her act of performance art that reflected our nation’s yams dancing in our heads, the very idea of grotesque sublimation of its own basest desires. referring to a Republican US presidential campaign Once I reached the apex of this performance, my as ‘performance art’ seems preposterous. father said, I must leverage the full attention of the Certainly, American electoral campaigns have electorate to once and for all let the veil be lifted. long been derided as ‘theatre’, campaign events as Now is that time. (Richards 2016) ‘spectacles’ and even acts of governance as ‘kabuki The contention that Trump’s campaign could theatre’. The rise of the celebrity politician from be a work of fiction – a hoax, a pseudo-event, Ronald Reagan onward dissolved the boundary a calculated PR stunt – pervaded mainstream between politics and entertainment, exemplifying news sources, the Internet and social media capitalism’s triumph of spectacle and simulation during the 2016 presidential campaign. as theorized most famously by Guy Debord and PERFORMANCE RESEARCH 22·3 : pp.127-135 ISSN 1352-8165 print/1469-9990 online 127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2017.1348607 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group PR 22.3 On Proximity.indd 127 30/08/2017 14:05 Jean Baudrillard. But with performance art’s long Abramović in discourses of belief: the conspiracy legacy of demonization by the Right, that even theory Pizzagate and the faux documentary film The Wall Street Journal would seek to describe trailer The Nominee. Trump as a performance artist is nearly as hard to believe as his election (Henninger 2016). However, MIND THE AESTHETIC GAP a demonstrable shift in the popular understanding ( FROM POPULIST PERFORMANCE ARTIST of the term ‘performance art’ has occurred in TO BULLSHIT ARTIST AND BACK) recent years – away from the moral hazard that the religious Right had so successfully cast it as in Walter Benjamin posed fascism’s threat as, the 1980s, to a merging of celebrity and art to fundamentally, a representational crisis, in form what the pop star and Marina Abramović that the aestheticization of politics enabled acolyte Lady Gaga terms ‘pop performance art’ society to ‘experience its own destruction as an (Auslander 2016: 182). Largely due to Abramović’s aesthetic pleasure of the first order’ (1968: 248). adoption of the once unimaginable role of Trumpism’s destructive march emerges from ‘celebrity performance artist’, as well as her what may be called the aesthetic pleasures of packaging of ‘presence’ as a commodity, the second order. In the contemporary context ‘performance art’ has come to signify the artistic of neoliberal capitalism, this second order of hoaxes staged by such celebrities as James Franco, aesthetic pleasure, I suggest, is to be taken in the Shia LeBeouf and Joaquin Phoenix. Nonetheless, ‘pseudo-aura’: the more proximate reality of the as Philip Auslander says of Lady Gaga’s coinage of spectacle, which complements and compensates ‘pop performance art’, describing a major for what Benjamin calls the ‘cult value’ of presidential candidate as a performance artist aura’s ‘distance’ (1968: 222). In response to ‘would be impossible if it weren’t formulated the loss of that distance, neoliberalism offers today’ (2016: 184). pseudo-auratic closeness, fulfilling what Debord While the anti-theatrical trope of deriding describes as the spectacle’s function as ‘a a politician’s ‘acting’ maintains the stability shared acknowledgement of loss, an imaginary of the symbolic economy of representation, compensation’ (1994: 20). the figure of Trump-as-performance-artist Fantasy though the ‘realness’ of represents a fundamental conceptual shift. @realDonaldTrump may be, the suffering it It expresses the crisis of representation has already effected and the global danger it that Baudrillard describes as the collapse of portends are horribly real. While some critics belief in the ‘reality principle’ precipitated by in the press have turned to Debord to explain capitalism (Baudrillard 1994). With the loss Trumpism as a triumph of image over reality, Downloaded by [Tony Perucci] at 05:37 21 September 2017 of belief in the symbolic economies of both what is perhaps even more critical to reckoning representation and representative democracy, with Trump’s success is Debord’s description ‘performance art’ promises to circumvent both of the spectacle’s logic of authoritarianism: political and symbolic distance in each of the ‘the ruling order discourses on itself in an seemingly incongruous worlds of the celebrity uninterrupted monologue of self-praise’ to politician’s claims to ‘@realDonaldTrump’ and support ‘the age of power’s totalitarian rule the performance artist celebrity’s claims to over the conditions of existence’ (Zaretzky ‘raw presence’. In what follows, I theorize the 2017; Debord 1994: 19). Donald Trump’s quite relationship between reactionary populism and literal ‘uninterrupted monologues of self- celebrity performance art in terms of what I call praise’ dispense with even the proximity of the neoliberalism’s compensatory ‘pseudo-aura’, pseudo-aura by offering, instead, the aesthetic whose inadequacies produce the conditions for pleasure of a politician expressing openly and both populism’s and performance art’s claims to explicitly the raced, gendered and brutal truth unmediated reality. I then turn to two cases that of neoliberalism. In his willingness to speak to entwine the figures of Donald Trump and Marina the reality that neoliberal capitalism follows 128 PERFORMANCE RESEARCH 22·3 : ON PROXIMITY PR 22.3 On Proximity.indd 128 30/08/2017 14:05 the exploitative and exclusionary logic of through the direct and unmediated relation to plutocracy, Jodi Dean contends that Trump is ‘the people’. However, Trump’s performance, ‘the most honest candidate in American politics like that of other populist leaders, is no more today’ (2015). Unlike the mystifications uttered able to evade its condition as a representation by neoliberal centrists, Trump expresses the than is performance art. Drawing on Derrida’s fundamental ethos of capitalism: ‘Those with theorization of the performative, Joseph Arditi money win. Those without it lose. Winners get to argues that populist performance cannot fulfil do whatever they want. Losers get done to’ (ibid.). its promise of direct presence of ‘the people’ but Trump’s campaign adopted the style of rather depends upon acts of ‘rendering-present’ contemporary populism to redirect widespread that not only signify ‘the people’ but also produce frustration with neoliberalism’s failures them (2007: 64). This presence is but another into anger towards ‘elites’ and racialized ‘effect of representation’, an ‘absent presence’ Others. Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, promised that the populist leader alleges can resolve the a continuation of the neoliberal order initiated problematic distance of political representation’s by Thatcher and Reagan and continued by aesthetic gap by eliminating it altogether (64–5).
Recommended publications
  • The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
    Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: a Narrative- Based Analysis of His Supporters and of the Candidate Himself Mitchell A
    University of Puget Sound Sound Ideas Summer Research Summer 2016 Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative- based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Mitchell A. Carlson 7886304 University of Puget Sound, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Carlson, Mitchell A. 7886304, "Who Supports Donald J. Trump?: A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself" (2016). Summer Research. Paper 271. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/summer_research/271 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Sound Ideas. It has been accepted for inclusion in Summer Research by an authorized administrator of Sound Ideas. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Mitchell Carlson Professor Robin Dale Jacobson 8/24/16 Who Supports Donald J. Trump? A narrative-based analysis of his supporters and of the candidate himself Introduction: The Voice of the People? “My opponent asks her supporters to recite a three-word loyalty pledge. It reads: “I’m With Her.” I choose to recite a different pledge. My pledge reads: ‘I’m with you—the American people.’ I am your voice.” So said Donald J. Trump, Republican presidential nominee and billionaire real estate mogul, in his speech echoing Richard Nixon’s own convention speech centered on law-and-order in 1968.1 2 Introduced by his daughter Ivanka, Trump claimed at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio that he—and he alone—is the voice of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT the FOLLOWING COMPANIES and PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO Raised Money for Trump Presidential Campaign
    Consum5.doc. 11-20. NEBRASKA TAXPAYERS FOR FREEDOM WORKSHEET: PART 2: CONSERVATIVES SHOULD SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING COMPANIES AND PERSONALITIES: ABC Supply: CEO raised money for Trump presidential campaign. Ace Hardware: supports conservative causes. Reversed its decision to withdraw ads from the Laura Ingraham TV Show. ADT: advertises on Sean Hannity Show, subject to liberal boycott. Advance Auto Parts: supports conservative causes. Alaska Airlines: supports conservative religious causes. Amazon Fashion: boycotted by liberals. American Greetings Corporation: supports conservative causes. Amway: 100% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Leftists boycott this company. Amy Grant: conservative celebrity. Angel Soft: contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Applebees: opposes Obama Care mandates. Axon: the technology company that supplies police with nonlethal weapons, such as tasers, defends its continued production of weapons. B.F. Goodrich (tires): 97% of its contributions go to Republicans and conservatives. Badger Sportswear: cut ties in Red China after discovering that a company with which it was affiliated there uses workers from a concentration camp for targeted members of ethnic minority groups persecuted by the government. Barron's Magazine: conservative. Bass Pro Shop: supports the NRA and 2nd Amendment rights. Bayer Company: supports conservative causes. Billy Ray Cyrus: conservative celebrity. Black Rifle Coffee: conservative company. Blaze TV: conservative media outlet. Bloomingdale's: carries Ivanka Trump clothes, shoes, and accessories. Blue Bell Creameries: conservative company. Bo Derek: conservative celebrity. Bob Evans Farms: conservative company. Bon-ton: boycotted by liberals. Brawny Paper Towels: leftists boycott this company, so buy these towels. Contributes to NRA and pro-life groups. Breitbart News: conservative news outlet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party: a Party Within a Party a Dissertation Submitted to The
    The Tea Party: A Party Within a Party A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Rachel Marie Blum, M.A. Washington, DC March 22, 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Rachel Marie Blum All Rights Reserved ii The Tea Party: A Party Within a Party Rachel Marie Blum, M.A. Dissertation Advisor: Hans Noel, Ph.D. Abstract It is little surprise that conservatives were politically disaffected in early 2009, or that highly conservative individuals mobilized as a political movement to protest ‘big government’ and Obama’s election. Rather than merely directing its animus against liberals, the Tea Party mobilized against the Republican Party in primaries and beyond. This dissertation draws from original survey, interview, Tea Party blog, and social network datasets to explain the Tea Party’s strategy for mobilization as a ‘Party within a Party’. Integrating new data on the Tea Party with existing theories of political parties, I show that the Tea Party’s strategy transcends the focused aims of a party faction. Instead, it works to co-opt the Republican Party’s political and electoral machinery in order to gain control of the party. This dissertation offers new insights on the Tea Party while developing a theory of intra-party mobilization that endures beyond the Tea Party. Index words: Dissertations, Government, Political Science, Political Parties, Tea Party iii Dedication To M.L.B., and all others who are stronger than they know.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Tow Center for Digital Journalism CONSERVATIVE A Tow/Knight Report NEWSWORK A Report on the Values and Practices of Online Journalists on the Right Anthony Nadler, A.J. Bauer, and Magda Konieczna Funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 7 Boundaries and Tensions Within the Online Conservative News Field 15 Training, Standards, and Practices 41 Columbia Journalism School Conservative Newswork 3 Executive Summary Through much of the 20th century, the U.S. news diet was dominated by journalism outlets that professed to operate according to principles of objectivity and nonpartisan balance. Today, news outlets that openly proclaim a political perspective — conservative, progressive, centrist, or otherwise — are more central to American life than at any time since the first journalism schools opened their doors. Conservative audiences, in particular, express far less trust in mainstream news media than do their liberal counterparts. These divides have contributed to concerns of a “post-truth” age and fanned fears that members of opposing parties no longer agree on basic facts, let alone how to report and interpret the news of the day in a credible fashion. Renewed popularity and commercial viability of openly partisan media in the United States can be traced back to the rise of conservative talk radio in the late 1980s, but the expansion of partisan news outlets has accelerated most rapidly online. This expansion has coincided with debates within many digital newsrooms. Should the ideals journalists adopted in the 20th century be preserved in a digital news landscape? Or must today’s news workers forge new relationships with their publics and find alternatives to traditional notions of journalistic objectivity, fairness, and balance? Despite the centrality of these questions to digital newsrooms, little research on “innovation in journalism” or the “future of news” has explicitly addressed how digital journalists and editors in partisan news organizations are rethinking norms.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Election 2 Contents
    Covering the Coverage The 2020 Election 2 Contents 4 Foreword 29 Us versus him Kyle Pope Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 5 Why did Matt Drudge turn on August 10, 2020 Donald Trump? Bob Norman 37 The campaign begins (again) January 29, 2020 Kyle Pope August 12, 2020 8 One America News was desperate for Trump’s approval. 39 When the pundits paused Here’s how it got it. Simon van Zuylen–Wood Andrew McCormick Summer 2020 May 27, 2020 47 Tuned out 13 The story has gotten away from Adam Piore us Summer 2020 Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 57 ‘This is a moment for June 3, 2020 imagination’ Mychal Denzel Smith, Josie Duffy 22 For Facebook, a boycott and a Rice, and Alex Vitale long, drawn-out reckoning Summer 2020 Emily Bell July 9, 2020 61 How to deal with friends who have become obsessed with 24 As election looms, a network conspiracy theories of mysterious ‘pink slime’ local Mathew Ingram news outlets nearly triples in size August 25, 2020 Priyanjana Bengani August 4, 2020 64 The only question in news is ‘Will it rate?’ Ariana Pekary September 2, 2020 3 66 Last night was the logical end 92 The Doociness of America point of debates in America Mark Oppenheimer Jon Allsop October 29, 2020 September 30, 2020 98 How careful local reporting 68 How the media has abetted the undermined Trump’s claims of Republican assault on mail-in voter fraud voting Ian W. Karbal Yochai Benkler November 3, 2020 October 2, 2020 101 Retire the election needles 75 Catching on to Q Gabriel Snyder Sam Thielman November 4, 2020 October 9, 2020 102 What the polls show, and the 78 We won’t know what will happen press missed, again on November 3 until November 3 Kyle Pope Kyle Paoletta November 4, 2020 October 15, 2020 104 How conservative media 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Fake News in Twitter During the 2016 US Presidential
    Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election Alexandre Bovet1;2;3, Hern´anA. Makse1;∗ 1) Levich Institute and Physics Department, City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA 2) ICTEAM, Universit´eCatholique de Louvain, Avenue George Lema^ıtre 4, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 3) naXys and Department of Mathematics, Universit´ede Namur, Rempart de la Vierge 8, 5000 Namur, Belgium. * [email protected] Abstract The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of these users to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modelling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders. 1 Introduction Recent social and political events, such as the 2016 US presidential election [1], have been marked by a growing number of so-called \fake news", i.e. fabricated information that disseminate deceptive content, or grossly distort actual news reports, shared on social media platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Report
    FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 2, 2017 BY Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Galen Stocking, Katerina Matsa and Elizabeth M. Grieco FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Rachel Weisel, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, October, 2017, “Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment” 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2017 www.pewresearch.org 3 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Table of Contents About Pew Research Center 2 Table of Contents 3 Covering President Trump in a Polarized Media Environment 4 1. Coverage from news outlets with a right-leaning audience cited fewer source types, featured more positive assessments than coverage from other two groups 14 2. Five topics accounted for two-thirds of coverage in first 100 days 25 3. A comparison to early coverage of past
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Football Game #12
    TENNESSEE FOOTBALL GAME #12 #FourInARow Vols Dominating Last 4 PAGE 5 6-TIME NATIONAL CHAMPS » 13 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS » 50 BOWL GAMES » 89 ALL-AMERICANS » 45 NFL 1ST-ROUND PICKS RV/- TENNESSEE (7-4, 4-3 SEC) SCHEDULE & RECORD vs. VANDERBILT (4-7, 2-5 SEC) OVERALL RECORD: 7-4 NOV. 28, 2015 » NEYLAND STADIUM (102,455) » KNOXVILLE, TENN. » 4 P.M. » SECN SEC 4-3 NON-CONFERENCE 3-1 HOME 4-2 THE MATCHUP | #VANDYvsTENN AWAY 2-2 NEUTRAL 1-0 TENNESSEE VOLUNTEERS VANDERBILT COMMODORES THE RECORD vs THE SCHEDULE QUICK COMPARISON 32.6 (48/5) Points/Game (127/14) 14.0 DATE UT RK. OPPONENT (TV) TIME/RESULT 20.5 (25/6) Points Allowed/Game (14/5) 18.1 Sept. 5 25/25 vs. Bowling Green (SECN) W, 59-30 213.7 (26/2) Rush Yards/Game (93/11) 150.4 Sept. 12 23/23 19/17 OKLA. (ESPN) L, 24-31 (2ot) 148.8 (47/9) Rush Yards Allowed/Game (24/5) 126.1 Sept. 19 RV/RV W. CAROLINA (ESPNU) W, 55-10 199.6 (92/9) Pass Yards/Game (112/14) 168.5 Sept. 26 RV/RV at RV/RV Florida* (CBS) L, 27-28 217.9 (58/11) Pass Yards Allowed/Game (44/8) 208.7 Oct. 3 RV/RV ARKANSAS* (ESPN2) L, 20-24 413.4 (57/7) Total Offense/Game (119/13) 318.8 Oct. 10 19/16 GEORGIA* (CBS) W, 38-31 366.7 (47/7) Total Defense/Game (22/5) 334.8 Oct. 24 at 8/8 Alabama* (CBS) L, 14-19 UTSPORTS.COM (National Ranking/Conference Ranking) VUCOMMODORES.COM Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS
    Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online Alice Marwick and Rebecca Lewis CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................... 1 What Techniques Do Media Manipulators Use? ....... 33 Understanding Media Manipulation ............................ 2 Participatory Culture ........................................... 33 Who is Manipulating the Media? ................................. 4 Networks ............................................................. 34 Internet Trolls ......................................................... 4 Memes ................................................................. 35 Gamergaters .......................................................... 7 Bots ...................................................................... 36 Hate Groups and Ideologues ............................... 9 Strategic Amplification and Framing ................. 38 The Alt-Right ................................................... 9 Why is the Media Vulnerable? .................................... 40 The Manosphere .......................................... 13 Lack of Trust in Media ......................................... 40 Conspiracy Theorists ........................................... 17 Decline of Local News ........................................ 41 Influencers............................................................ 20 The Attention Economy ...................................... 42 Hyper-Partisan News Outlets ............................. 21 What are the Outcomes? ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appellants' Reply Brief
    ACCEPTED 03-19-00811-CV 40902128 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/18/2020 4:11 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-19-00811-CV FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS, AUSTIN, TEXAS USTIN EXAS A , T 2/18/2020 8:00:00 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk ALEX E. JONES, INFOWARS, LLC, FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, AND OWEN SHROYER, Appellants, v. NEIL HESLIN, Appellee On Appeal from the 53rd District Court, Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-18-001835 APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF T. Wade Jefferies David J. Sacks THE LAW FIRM OF T. WADE JEFFERIES SACKS LAW FIRM State Bar No. 00790962 State Bar No. 17505700 401 Congress Ave., Suite 1540 2323 S. Shepherd, Suite 825 Austin, TX 78701 Houston, TX 77019 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Telephone: (512) 201-2727 Telephone: (713) 863-8400 Facsimile: (512) 687-3499 Facsimile: (713) 863-0502 Counsel for Appellants Lead Counsel for Appellants ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED NO. 03-19-00811-CV TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................... ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES .....................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 7 I. APPELLEE’S DEFAMATION CAUSE OF ACTION SHOULD BE DISMISSED UNDER THE TCPA. ...............................................................
    [Show full text]