DOCSLIB.ORG

Former Bennett Freeze Area Draft Integrated Resource Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Former Bennett Freeze Area Draft Integrated Resource Management Plan Former Bennett Freeze Area Draft Integrated Resource Management Plan May 2020 “A rehabilitated Former Bennett Freeze Area (FBFA) with well-managed natural resources and environmental conditions, improved economic conditions and quality of life, with preserved Diné culture and traditions.” Navajo Nation Prepared by: The Navajo Nation Division of Natural Resources and the United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs, Navajo Region Disclaimer – Information provided to the Bureau of Indian Affairs by other entities may use different terminology (e.g., Navajo Nation Chapter House names). However, this information is not the intellectual property of the authors or the Bureau of Indian Affairs and therefore has not been changed. In addition, the Chapter House boundaries referenced are not official boundaries. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Previous Work .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Location and Setting ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Resource Management Tribal Codes and Federal Laws ............................................................... 5 2. Planning Process and Public Involvement ............................................................................................ 7 2.1 Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Concurrence and Approval Process ...................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Tribal Membership Participation ................................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Community Input Received during the Planning Process ................................................... 11 2.2.2 Issues and Concerns ............................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Community Vision and Goals ..................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1 Vision Statement ................................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 Community Goals ............................................................................................................... 12 3. Integrated Resource Management Planning Alternatives ................................................................... 14 4. Resource Descriptions......................................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Soils, Water, Air Quality, and Climate ....................................................................................... 14 4.1.1 Soils ..................................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Water ................................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.3 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................... 37 4.1.4 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 40 4.2 Agriculture and Rangeland Management ................................................................................... 41 Navajo Nation Division of Natural Resources and the Bureau of Indian Affairs Navajo Region May 2020 - i - 4.2.1 Agriculture .......................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.2 Rangeland ........................................................................................................................... 51 4.3 Forestlands .................................................................................................................................. 57 4.4 Fish and Wildlife ......................................................................................................................... 83 4.4.1 Vegetation Communities ..................................................................................................... 84 4.4.2 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................... 87 4.4.3 Resource Concentration Protection Areas .......................................................................... 87 4.4.4 Navajo Nation Priority Species and Habitats ...................................................................... 91 4.5 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 91 4.5.1 Historic and Archaeological Resources .............................................................................. 94 4.5.2 Traditional Cultural Properties ............................................................................................ 95 4.5.3 Navajo Nation Policy for the Protection of Jishchaa': Gravesites, Human Remains, and Funerary Items .................................................................................................................................... 95 4.6 Outdoor Recreation ..................................................................................................................... 96 4.7 Minerals ...................................................................................................................................... 96 4.7.1 Resource Use Patterns ......................................................................................................... 97 4.7.2 Navajo Abandoned Mine Lands Reclamation/Uranium Mine Tailing Remediation .......... 98 5. Management Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 99 5.1 Primary Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 99 5.2 Water ......................................................................................................................................... 100 5.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................ 102 5.4 Climate Change ......................................................................................................................... 102 5.5 Agriculture ................................................................................................................................ 103 5.6 Noxious/Invasive Weeds........................................................................................................... 104 5.7 Rangeland ................................................................................................................................. 106 5.8 Forestland .................................................................................................................................. 108 5.9 Fish and Wildlife ....................................................................................................................... 111 Navajo Nation Division of Natural Resources and the Bureau of Indian Affairs Navajo Region May 2020 - ii - 5.10 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 112 5.11 Outdoor Recreation ................................................................................................................... 113 5.12 Minerals .................................................................................................................................... 114 5.13 Land Use and Administration ................................................................................................... 114 6. References ......................................................................................................................................... 117 Appendices Appendix A Memorandum of Understanding between the Navajo Nation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Navajo Regional Office Appendix B Intergovernmental Compact between the Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribe Appendix C – Former Bennett Freeze Economic and Market Feasibility Study Appendix D – Excerpts from Former Bennett Freeze Area Chapter Land Use Plans Appendix E – Ecological Site Descriptions Appendix F – Chapter Land Use Authorities List of Tables Table 4-1. Number of Springs and Condition in the Former Bennett Freeze Area .................................... 30 Table 4-2. Irrigation and Livestock Water Sources in the Former Bennett Freeze Area ............................ 31 Table 4-3. Percent of FBFA Households without Access to Public Water System
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Narbonapass.Pdf
    FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG 1 FIRST-DAY ROAD LOG, FROM GALLUP TO GAMERCO, YAH-TA-HEY, WINDOW ROCK, FORT DEFIANCE, NAVAJO, TODILTO PARK, CRYSTAL, NARBONA PASS, SHEEP SPRINGS, TOHATCHI AND GALLUP SPENCER G. LUCAS, STEVEN C. SEMKEN, ANDREW B. HECKERT, WILLIAM R. BERGLOF, First-day Road Log GRETCHEN HOFFMAN, BARRY S. KUES, LARRY S. CRUMPLER AND JAYNE C. AUBELE ������ ������ ������ ������� ������ ������ ������ ������ �������� Distance: 141.8 miles ������� Stops: 5 ���� ������ ������ SUMMARY ������ �� ������ �� ����� �� The first day’s trip takes us around the southern �� �� flank of the Defiance uplift, back over it into the �� southwestern San Juan Basin and ends at the Hogback monocline at Gallup. The trip emphasizes Mesozoic— especially Jurassic—stratigraphy and sedimentation in NOTE: Most of this day’s trip will be conducted the Defiance uplift region. We also closely examine within the boundaries of the Navajo (Diné) Nation under Cenozoic volcanism of the Navajo volcanic field. a permit from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department. Stop 1 at Window Rock discusses the Laramide Persons wishing to conduct geological investigations Defiance uplift and introduces Jurassic eolianites near on the Navajo Nation, including stops described in this the preserved southern edge of the Middle-Upper guidebook, must first apply for and receive a permit Jurassic depositional basin. At Todilto Park, Stop 2, from the Navajo Nation Minerals Department, P.O. we examine the type area of the Jurassic Todilto For- Box 1910, Window Rock, Arizona, 86515, 928-871- mation and discuss Todilto deposition and economic 6587. Sample collection on Navajo land is forbidden. geology, a recurrent theme of this field conference. From Todilto Park we move on to the Green Knobs diatreme adjacent to the highway for Stop 3, and then to Stop 4 at the Narbona Pass maar at the crest of the Chuska Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • "Comments of the Navajo Nationregarding the ""Indian
    jurisdiction. Specifically, section 1451 (b) (1) (B) of the SDWA provides that a Tribe may exercise regulatory functions under the Act provided that such functions "are within the area of the Tribal Government's jurisdiction." However, the SDWA does not provide further specific guidance regarding the types of land that may be considered to be within the area of a Tribal Government's jurisdiction. The federal regulations implementing this section of the SDWA, reiterating the broad statutory language, do not adopt a specific definition of what constitutes the "area of the Tribal Government's jurisdiction." The preamble to these regulations indicates that the extent of tribal jurisdiction must be examined on a case-by-case basis.~ As indicated Above, much of the discussion in the Attorney General's statement relates to the Navajo Nation's assertion of authority over land within the Eastern Navajo Agency. The Attorney General argues that in accordance with well-established principles of federal Indian law, the Navajo Nation possesses both civil regulatory authority and criminal authority over the Eastern Navajo Agency lands because this land constitutes "Indian country." As a result, he concludes that the Navajo Nation has; sufficient jurisdiction over the Eastern Navajo Agency to support an EPA determination to treat the Navajo Nation as a State with respect to all of those lands pursuant to section 1451 of the SDWA. In making the argument that the Navajo Nation's jurisdiction extends over all of Navajo Indian country, Attorney General Yazzie cites several instances in which EPA has previously adopted or - utilized the Indian country definition to outline either the extent of federal authority or the limits of state jurisdiction with respect to environmental regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Investigations of Ship Rock and Thumb Igneous Centers, New Mexico
    Bank, C. 2007. 20th Annual Keck Symposium; http://keck.wooster.edu/publications GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SHIP ROCK AND THUMB IGNEOUS CENTERS, NEW MEXICO CARL-GEORG BANK, JEFF NOBLETT, GLENN KROEGER, STEVEN SEMKEN University of Toronto, Colorado College, Trinity University, Arizona State University INTRODUCTION minette plugs, it intruded the surrounding Cretaceous Mancos shale in middle Oligocene Imaging the subsurface structure of two times. Differential erosion has left Ship Rock important volcanic centers of the mid-Tertiary towering 550 m above the surrounding plains Navajo Volcanic Field, on the Colorado Plateau, (Fig. 1). serves several purposes. Besides having specific implications for the formation of these particular features, our project will aid in understanding similar structures across the Colorado Plateau. Various researchers [e.g., Rubin, 1991; Mériaux and Jaupart, 1998; Segall et al., 2001] imagine the emplacement of a dike as vertical movement through host rock, often along preexisting faults or cracks, driven by magma pressure, and modified by the change in stress regime with depth. Other models [e.g., Delaney and Pollard, 1981; Quareni et al., 2001] allow magma to flow in pipes in addition to, and possibly following, its emplacement in dikes. Our results will provide valuable data against which to test such competing models of magma emplacement, and Figure 1: View of the Ship Rock diatreme from the – in a wider sense – aid in understanding diverse South-East (Photo: Brett Mayhew) processes like hydraulic fracturing, tensile fracturing, and dike-generated seismicity [Baer, Seven dikes of mafic minette (a potassic mica 1991]. lamprophyre containing phlogopite) extend from the diatreme. The largest of these is up to GEOLOGICAL AND 30 m high, about 2 m wide, and can be followed for about 9 km to the South.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2, 2015 Begaye Requests Fema
    OCTOBER 2, 2015 BEGAYE REQUESTS FEMA PRELIMINARY DAMAGE ASSESSMENT Window Rock – President Russell Begaye yesterday formally requested a Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in response to the Gold King Mine spill. A Preliminary Damage Assessment is the first step in the application process for public assistance for recovery from a disaster for eligible applicants. “The spill caused damage to the water quality of the San Juan River to such a massive extent that a state of emergency was declared by the Navajo Nation,” wrote President Begaye in a letter to EPA Associate Administrator Elizabeth Zimmerman. “All of the economic, health, cultural and other impacts to the Navajo people are not yet known. Given the significance of the San Juan River to the health, welfare economy, and culture of our Nation and people, the Navajo Nation, as a federally recognized Indian tribe, officially and specifically requests a mission assignment for Technical Assistance to complete a Preliminary Damage Assessment for damages as sustained as a result of the Gold King Mine spill.” Last month, FEMA rejected the Navajo Nation’s request for the appointment of a disaster- recovery coordinator to direct the federal government’s response to the crisis. During his testimony before Congress following the decision, President Begaye called on the federal government, and specially FEMA, to provide greater support to address the disaster caused by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) spill. CLICK HERE FOR FULL LETTER TO FEMA ## FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE [email protected] October 5, 2015 ATTORNEY GENERAL BRANCH ASKS EPA TO ASSURE FAIR SATISFACTION OF MINE SPILL CLAIMS Window Rock – On Friday, Navajo Attorney General Ethel Branch formally requested that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) assure full and fair satisfaction of all claims, known and unknown, against the agency following the Gold King Mine spill.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    81 THE WASHINGTON PASS VOLCANIC CENTER: EVOLUTION AND ERUPTION OF MINETTE MAGMAS OF THE NAVAJO VOLCANIC FIELD S.N. Ehrenberg (Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024) Minettes of the Navajo Volcanic Field are of interest because they formed at depths of at least 150 km and appear to be genetically related to kimberlite diatremes. Minettes and their extrusive equivalents (tra- chybasalts) at the 2 km diameter subsidence crater at Washington Pass were chosen for detailed study because of the relatively well-developed eruptive history displayed in the crater stratigraphy and the presence of contrasting mafic and trachytic lavas. Eruption began with ejection of voluminous pyroclastic deposits, including both tuff-breccias, composed predominantly of comminuted sediments with subordinate minette and cry¬ stalline basement fragments, and agglomerates, composed mainly of minette clasts. These deposits are thickest (>100 m) on the east and west sides of the crater, where they are exposed in cliffs produced by landsliding. On the west, tuff-breccias predominate and exhibit a remark¬ able alternation of coarse- and fine-grained beds 0.1 - 1 m thick, suggest¬ ive of rhythmic variation in the physical properties in the eruptive med¬ ium. On the east, the pyroclastic materials are mostly agglo¬ merates. Low-angle cross-bedding is common in all the pyroclastic beds, but in the eastern agglomerates this feature is accompanied by dune structures. Some of these formed by accretion on the lee side, while others display accretion on the side facing the crater. Asymmetrical bomb sags are also abundant in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiprock Disposal Site Observational Site Visit
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF Legacy EN ERGYI Management Shiprock, New Mexico, Disposal Site This fact sheet provides information about the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation ControlAct of 1978 Title I disposalsite at Shiprock, New Mexico. This site is managed by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Legacy Management. Site Description and History The Shiprock site is the location of a former uranium- and vanadium-ore-processing facility within the Navajo Nation in the northwest corner of New Mexico near the town of Shiprock, approximately 28 miles west of Farmington. Kerr-McGee built the mill and operated the facility from 1954 until 1963. Vanadium Corporation of America purchased the mill and operated it until it closed in 1968. The milling operations created process- related wastes and radioactive tailings, a predominantly sandy material. The mill, ore storage area, raffinate ponds (ponds that contain spent liquids from the milling process), and tailings piles occupied approximately 230 acres leased from the Navajo Nation. In 1983, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the Navajo Nation entered into an agreement for site cleanup. By September 1986, all tailings and associ- ated materials (including contaminated materials from offsite vicinity properties) were encapsulated in the disposal cell built on top of the existing tailings piles. Regulatory Setting Location of the Shiprock Disposal Site Congress passed the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation from the disposal cell to the San Juan River is about Control Act (UMTRCA) in 1978 (Public Law 95-604) 600 feet. and DOE remediated 22 inactive uranium-ore- Groundwater in the terrace area is thought to be a processing sites under the Uranium Mill Tailings result of human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Land Use Plan and Housing Planning Project
    NAHASDA (NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ASSISTANCE AND SELF DETERMINATION ACT) CHAPTER LAND USE PLAN AND HOUSING PLANNING PROJECT MASTER LAND USE PLAN SHIPROCK CHAPTER, NAVAJO NATION Prepared by: DUANE H. YAZZIE CONSULTANT Rez Star Point SHIPROCK, NAVAJO NATION 1 NAHASDA (NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ASSISTANCE AND SELF DETERMINATION ACT) CHAPTER LAND USE PLAN AND HOUSING PLANNING PROJECT MASTER LAND USE PLAN SHIPROCK CHAPTER, NAVAJO NATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECTRUM 1: Introduction, Authority, Purpose and Process Page No. 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Background 7 1.3 Authority 8 1.4 Purpose 10 1.5 Planning Process 10 1.6 Community Participation Process 14 1.7 Conclusion 16 1.8 Definitions 17 1.9 Exhibits 20 SPECTRUM 2: Community Assessment 2.1 Vision Statement 27 2.2 Existing Land Status Information 29 2.3 Demographics Data 30 2.4 Existing and Future Residential Needs 30 2.5 Grazing and Agriculture Information 35 2.6 Community and Public Facilities Information 36 2.7 Commercial and Industrial Development Information 45 2.8 Exhibits 47 SPECTRUM 3: Land Suitability Analysis 3.1 Background 56 3.2 Existing Environment 56 3.3 Site Analysis Elements 57 3.3.1 Hydrologic Features 57 3.3.2 Soils 58 3.3.3 Slopes and Topography 58 3.3.4 Vegetation and Wildlife 59 3.3.5 Culturally Sensitive Areas 61 3.3.6 Traditionally Sensitive Areas 61 3.3.7 Environmentally Sensitive Areas 62 2 3.4 Accessibility 67 3.5 Conclusion 67 3.6 Consultation Coordination 67 3.7 Bibliography 68 3.8 Exhibits 70 SPECTRUM 4: Infrastructure Analysis 4.1 Background 81 4.2 Infrastructure Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Lloyd L. Lee Native American Studies 7-1-21
    Lloyd L. Lee Native American Studies 7-1-21 Educational History Ph.D., 2004, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, American Studies, Dissertation title: 21st Century Diné Cultural Identity: Defining and Practicing Sa’ah Naaghai Bik’eh Hozhoon, Amanda Cobb, Ph.D. M.A., 1995, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, Teacher Education and California Teaching Credential in Social Studies B.A., 1994, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, Major: History, Minor: Native American Studies Employment History, Part I Professor, 7/1/21 – present, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Associate Professor, 7/1/14 – 6/30/21, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Assistant Professor, 8/1/08 – 6/30/14, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Assistant Professor, 8/1/04 – 7/31/07, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ Social Studies Teacher, 8/1/95 – 5/31/99, Wingate High School, Fort Wingate, NM Employment History Part II Visiting Assistant Professor in Native American Studies, 8/1/07 -7/31/08, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Professional Recognition and Honors Presidential Teaching Fellow Award, promotes excellence in teaching and given the highest recognition for effective teaching, 2017 – 2019, Center for Teaching Excellence – University of New Mexico Honorary Stars, Special thank you and recognition from students, 2012 – 2013, American Indian Student Services – University of New Mexico Outstanding Commitment to Students Award, Recognition and honor of faculty and staff, 2005 -2006, Arizona State University at the West Campus 1 Short Narrative Description of Research, Teaching, and Service Interests My philosophy is to develop an individual’s critical consciousness through my teaching, research, and service.
    [Show full text]
  • Than Land: Native American Dispossession at Grand
    MORE THAN LAND: NATIVE AMERICAN DISPOSSESSION AT GRAND CANYON HONORS THESIS Presented to the Honors College of Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Graduation in the Honors College by Anna Magdelena Provenzano San Marcos, Texas May 2017 MORE THAN LAND: NATIVE AMERICAN DISPOSSESSION AT GRAND CANYON by Anna Magdelena Provenzano Thesis Supervisor: ___________________________ Jennifer A. Devine, Ph.D. Department of Geography Approved: ___________________________ Heather C. Galloway, Ph.D. Dean, Honors College COPYRIGHT By Anna Magdelena Provenzano 2017 iii FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Anna Magdelena Provenzano, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my supervisor, Dr. Devine, for her keeping me inspired throughout this process, while also on schedule. I also want to thank my parents for the endless support both in school and out. Writing this thesis would have been much more difficult without them. Thank you to the Honors College at Texas State University for giving me this opportunity to pursue research I believe is incredibly relevant and important. v CONTENTS I. Introduction.......................................................................................1 II. Background ..................................................................................... 5 American westward expansion ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comment of James Zion Regarding Uranium Recovery GEIS Scoping
    JAMES W. ZION Attorney at Law 3808 Ladera Drive N.W. Albuquerque, NM 87120 (505) 839-9549 [email protected] August 9, 2007 Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch Mail Stop T-6D59 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Uranium Recovery GEIS Dear Chief of the Rules Review and Directives Branch: I represent two organizations for these comments, and their identity and interests are as follows: The National Indian Youth Council (NIYC) is the second-oldest national Indian organization in the United States. It was founded in Gallup, New Mexico in 1961, and it has thousands of members throughout the country. It has taken a leadership role in environmental protection, filing suits for Indian communities that were opposed to the strip mining of coal and the mining and milling of uranium. Its primary goal as an organization is to assure the survival of Indian people. The NIYC's priority areas include freedom of religion, Indian political participation, the protection of Indian voting rights, public education, international initiatives (including the position taken in this letter), and job training and placement. The second group is The Forgotten People. It is an ad hoc organization located in the Navajo Nation, formerly known as "The Forgotten People of the Bennett Freeze Community," made up of and representing the interests of individuals who were relocated from the former Hopi Partitioned Lands and Navajo Partitioned Lands when the United States violated the human rights of Navajos and Hopis by relocating them. There are also individuals who continue to live in partitioned lands whose interests are represented by this organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Branch Third Quarterly Report
    OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT JONATHAN NEZ | PRESIDENT MYRON LIZER |VICE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE BRANCH THIRD QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMER COUNCIL SESSION JULY 2021 NAVAJO NATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT SUMMER COUNCIL SESSION 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. Department of Diné Education 2 II. Department of Human Resources 32 III. Diné Uranium Remediation Advisory Commission 39 IV. Division of Community Development 42 V. Division of Economic Development 58 VI. Division of General Services 78 VII. Division of Public Safety 82 VIII. NavaJo Department of Health 94 IX. NavaJo Division of Social Services 108 X. NavaJo Division of Transportation 116 XI. NavaJo Gaming Regulatory Office 120 XII. NavaJo Nation Department of Justice 125 XIII. NavaJo Nation Division of Natural Resources 130 XIV. NavaJo Nation Environmental Protection Agency 156 XV. NavaJo Nation Telecommunications Regulatory Commission 161 XVI. NavaJo Nation Veterans Administration 164 XVII. NavaJo Nation Washington Office 166 XVIII. NavaJo-Hopi Land Commission Office 173 XIX. Office of Hearing and Appeals 185 XX. Office of Management and Budget 187 XXI. Office of Miss NavaJo Nation 190 XXII. Office of NavaJo Public Defender 195 XXIII. Office of NavaJo Tax Commission 198 XXIV. Office of The Controller 201 1 Department of Diné Education SUMMER COUNCIL SESSION 2021 I. MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS II. CHALLENGES III. OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION 2 DODE hosted a live forum regarding the state of education on the Navajo Nation amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic with Navajo Nation school leaders and health experts the evening of June 17, 2021. The panel took questions and concerns from the audience as well as points brainstormed by DODE staff that parents may have about sending their children back to school for in-person instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • President Begaye and Senator Mccain Meet to Discuss Key Issues Facing the Navajo Nation
    The Navajo Nation Russell Begaye President Jonathan Nez Vice President Contact: Mihio Manus, Sr. Public Information Officer Office of the President and ViceCommunications President Office Office ofTHE the PresidentNAVAJO and NATION Vice President Phone: (928)Michele871-7728 J. Crank FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Mihio Manus JULY 25, 2016 Fax: (928)871-4025 928.871.7000 President Begaye and Senator McCain meet to discuss key issues facing the Navajo Nation Twin Arrows-Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye met with US Senator John McCain today to discuss key issues such as Senator Pierce’s Ft. Wingate Bill, the US EPA’s role in the compensation and remediation regarding the Gold King Mine spill and establishing an Oncology Treatment Center on the Navajo Nation. President Begaye asked for Senator McCain’s support in re- moving the ‘right of way’ language that was inserted into Sen- ator Pierce’s Ft. Wingate Bill, which would waive right of way fees the Nation could charge municipalities and power compa- nies to access tribal land. “We would like to have the right of way language removed from the Ft. Wingate Bill. We are moving forward on this in agreement with Council,” said President Begaye. “Having met President Begaye advocated for an Oncology Treatment Center to be built on the Navajo Nation. “Cancer rates continue to rise and this with Senator Udall last week, he agreed with us. We’d like that facility is highly needed,” he said. language removed.’ Regarding the Gold King Mine spill, President Begaye told people who reside in the area. Residents of the FBFA have Senator McCain that the area farmers have yet to be com- gone for forty years without being able to renovate their homes pensated for their losses.
    [Show full text]