DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance Forest T. Tuomasjukka (ed.) Forest Policy and Economics Policy in Support of Good Governance and Economics Forest-related policy issues have become ever more complex, multifaceted and are both an outcome of several underlying causes and driving forces and subject to influences of several policy sectors. These proceedings in comply the presentations of the international workshop Support Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance, organized in April 2009 in Dubrovnik, Croatia. The presentations and discussions of the of Good workshop on capacity building and governance made it very clear that there is a need for studies related to good Governance governance throughout Europe. Governance is a cross- cutting issue which is applicable to a multitude of sectors and businesses, and those professionals with an in-depth knowledge on good governance are likely to be increasingly attractive employees in the future. ISSN 1237-8801 ISBN 978-952-5453-35-5 EFI Proceedings No. 58, 2010 Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance Tuomasjukka, Tomi (ed.) EFI Proceedings No. 58, 2010 European Forest Institute Croatian Forest Research Institute EFI Proceedings No. 58, 2010 Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance Tuomasjukka, Tomi (ed.) Publisher: European Forest Institute Series Editors: Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Editor-in-Chief Minna Korhonen, Managing Editor Editorial Office: European Forest Institute Phone: +358 10 773 4300 Torikatu 34 Fax. +358 10 773 4377 FIN-80100 Joensuu, Finland Email: [email protected] http://www.efi.int/ Cover photo: Tomi Tuomasjukka Layout: Kopijyvä Oy Printing: WS Bookwell Oy Disclaimer: The papers in this book comprise the proceedings of the event mentioned on the back cover. They reflect the authors’ opinions and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Forest Institute. © European Forest Institute 2010 ISSN 1237-8801 (printed) ISBN 978-952-5453-35-5 (printed) ISSN 14587-0610 (online) ISBN 978-952-5453-36-2 (online) Contents Tikkanen, I. Foreword ........................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary Glück, P Governance as Choice of Policy Options.......................................................... 9 Tuomasjukka, T. Conclusions on Capacity Building and Governance ....................................... 17 Opening and Keynote Addresses Šavor, B. Opening Address ............................................................................................. 21 Benko, M. Objectives of the Workshop ............................................................................ 23 Müller, E. and Governance as an Element of Global Political Agendas ................................. 25 Tuomasjukka, T. Shannon, M.A. Preparing for the 22nd Century: Anticipating Surprise and Planning for Uncertainty ...................................................................................................... 31 Buszko-Briggs, M. Contribution by the MCPFE to Good Forest Governance in the Pan-European Region...................................................................................... 43 Recent Contributions of Forest Policy and Economics towards Good Forest Governance Carvalho Mendes, A. Development of Private Forestry in Southwestern Europe: the Role of Forest Owners’ Associations ........................................................................... 53 Petrović, N. and Outlook for the Formation of Private Forest Owners’ Associations in the Čabaravdić, A. Western Balkan Region ................................................................................... 63 Lengyel, A. Forest Policy Experiences on Private Forestry Development in Selected South East European Countries ....................................................................... 75 Ramcilovic et al. Provision of Non-market Forest Goods and Services through Governance Perspectives .................................................................................................... 81 Secco et al. Forest Fires: from Economic Assessment to Governance .............................. 93 Lovrić, M. and The Value of Urban Forests in Residential Land Use ................................... 105 Posavec, S. Vuletić et al. Forest-Related Conflicts in the South-East European Region: Regional aspects and Case studies in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia and Serbia ................................................................................... 117 Krilasevic, E. The Role of International Organizations in the Implementation of Biodiversity Conservation Policies – The Case of Bosnia-Herzegovina ...... 131 Kouplevatskaya- Forestry Institutions: Learning in Governance ............................................. 141 Buttoud, I. Capacity Building and Governance in Forest Sector Tikkanen, I. and Building Capacities for Good Governance through Forest Policy and Tuomasjukka, T. Economics ..................................................................................................... 149 Mavsar et al. Innovative and Integrated Approaches for Improved Management of the Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem .................................................................. 157 Shaytarova, O. Tempus FORPEC: Developing a New Master Program “Forest Policy and Economics” at Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical Academy ............... 161 Pelkonen, P. Responses to the Capacity Needs of Governance by Educational Programs – MSc in European Forestry ......................................................... 165 Pettenella et al. Master Courses in the Forestry Sector: Recent Experiences in Governance of High Education Systems in Europe ...................................... 169 Zschocke, T. and Exploring Technology-enhanced Learning Options to Improve the Jansky, L. Quality of Higher Forestry Education ........................................................... 179 Foreword Ilpo Tikkanen European Forest Institute Forest-related policy issues have become ever more complex, multifaceted and are both an outcome of several underlying causes and driving forces and subject to influences of several policy sectors. If we explore this complexity from comprehensive policy perspective and try to evaluate the roots and reasons for success stories or policy failures, studying of the existing governance patterns is a useful scientific approach and framework. In addressing the dominant issues influencing forest policy arena, such as climate change, inequality and poverty, forest fires, loss of biodiversity, or forest-based sustainable development, the concept of governance has become an inevitable and overarching tool. The employment of a broad and modern concept of governance, as fruitfully discussed in many articles of these proceedings, can also help in revealing the basic causes for policy failures, like low effectiveness and efficiency in implementation of policies or lack of relevance regarding policy aims and means. By using good forest governance as the analytical framework, policy failures can easily be ascribed to several governance-related factors, such as weak policy design processes, limited capacities in policy implementation, or lacking communication, follow-up and monitoring. These identified factors, however, contain also the ways and means towards better governance. Enhanced national, regional and international networking, partnership and capacity building are needed and science-policy- practice interaction must be strengthened in support of governance development. These deliberations formed the basis and frame for EFI’s international seminar on Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance, held in Dubrovnik, April 2009. The Seminar was built on FOPER-project and its evolving network and partnership within South-East Europe and with rest of Europe. The event for its part contributed also to the implementation of EFI’s strategy in terms of capacity building, networking, science- policy interaction and advocacy in pan-European region. The event provided a beneficial platform for the dialogue between policy-makers, decision-takers and scientists, regional and international, senior and junior participants to learn from each others. It is my pleasure to use this opportunity to warmly thank the hosts of this Seminar, both Ministry of Regional Development, Forestry and Water Management of Republic of Croatia and the Croatia Forest Research Institute for the excellent arrangements and the warm Croatian hospitality with its well-known atmosphere. I also thank the keynote speakers and all of you who made this event a success. I am thankful for the FOPER Team for your EFI Proceedings No. 58, 2009 Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance Tuomasjukka, Tomi (ed.) 6 Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance commitment and dedication to work for future good governance in your home countries. Tomi Tuomasjukka deserves special thanks for coordinating FOPER and editing these proceedings. Without proactive science-policy interaction there is no good governance. Executive Summary Governance as Choice of Policy Options Peter Glück BOKU, Vienna, Austria 1. Definition of “governance” The overarching theme of the International Workshop is “Forest Policy and Economics in Support of Good Governance”. According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), good governance “ensures that political, social and economic priorities are based on broad consensus in society and the voices of the poorest and the most
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R
    STUDIA FORESTALIA SUECICA NR 39 1966 Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. An Analysis of Soviet Competitive Potentialities Skogsekonomi i Sovjet~rnionen rned en unalys av landets potentiella konkurrenskraft by KARL VIICTOR ALGTTERE SICOGSH~GSICOLAN ROYAL COLLEGE OF FORESTRY STOCKHOLM Lord Keynes on the role of the economist: "He must study the present in the light of the past for the purpose of the future." Printed in Sweden by ESSELTE AB STOCKHOLM Foreword Forest Economy in the U.S.S.R. is a special study of the forestry sector of the Soviet economy. As such it makes a further contribution to the studies undertaken in recent years to elucidate the means and ends in Soviet planning; also it attempts to assess the competitive potentialities of the U.S.S.R. in international trade. Soviet studies now command a very great interest and are being undertaken at some twenty universities and research institutes mainly in the United States, the United Kingdoin and the German Federal Republic. However, it would seem that the study of the development of the forestry sector has riot received the detailed attention given to other fields. In any case, there have not been any analytical studies published to date elucidating fully the connection between forestry and the forest industries and the integration of both in the economy as a whole. Studies of specific sections have appeared from time to time, but I have no knowledge of any previous study which gives a complete picture of the Soviet forest economy and which could faci- litate the marketing policies of the western world, being undertaken at any university or college.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    THE WORLD BANK POLICY PLANNING AND RESEARCH STAFF Public Disclosure Authorized Environment Department Economic Analysis of Sustainable· Growth and Sustainable Development Public Disclosure Authorized JohnPezzey Public Disclosure Authorized March 1989 1ment Department Working Paper No. 15 ) n3 .15 Public Disclosure Authorized --,-·., use. The views and interpretations herein are those of I to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations or to SLC004236 This paper has been prepared by John Pezzey, a consultant to the Environment Department of the World Bank. He is an economist specializing on the roles of environmental resources and discount rates in growth theory, and is a visiting research fellow in the Environment and Behavior Program of the Institute of Behavioral Science at the University of Colorado at Boulder. The author is grateful to Robert Ayres, Edward Barbier, Herman Daly, Salah El Serafy, John English, Jonathan Fisher, Philip Graves, Stein Hansen, David Heigham, Jeffrey Krautkraemer, Nancy Olewiler, David Pearce, Henry Peskin, Barry Poulson, Ray Prince, David Ulph, Jeremy Warford and Tomasz Zylicz for helpful comments and discussions on earlier drafts of this paper. Departmental Working Papers are not formal publications of the World Bank. They present preliminary and unpolished results of country analysis or research that is circulated to encourage discussion and comment; citation and the use of such a paper should take account of its provisional content. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author, and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services*
    THOMAS C. BROWN,- JOHN C. BERGSTROM" & JOHN B. LOOMIS*** Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services* ABSTRACT Ecosystem services are the specific results of ecosystem processes that either directly sustain or enhance human life (as does natural protectionfrom the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays) or maintain the quality of ecosystem goods (as water purification maintains the quality of streamflow). "Ecosystem service" has come to represent several related topics ranging from the measurement to the marketing of ecosystem service flows. In this article we examine several of these topics by first clarifying the meaning of "ecosystem service" and then (1) placing ecosystem goods and services within an economic framework, emphasizing the role and limitations of substitutes;(2) summarizing the methodsfor valuationof ecosystem goods and services; and (3) reviewing the various approachesfor their provision and financing. Many ecosystem services and some ecosystem goods are received without monetary payment. The "marketing" of ecosystem goods and services is basically an effort to turn such recipients - those who benefit without ownership- into buyers, thereby providing market signals that serve to help protect valuable goods and services. We review various formal arrangementsfor making this happen. I. INTRODUCTION "Ecosystem service" is the latest environmental buzzword.1 It appeals to ecologists, who have long recognized the many benefits derived from well-functioning ecosystems. It appeals to resource economists, who . Economist and Project Leader, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. Address for correspondence: [email protected], T.C. Brown, RMRS, 2150-A Center Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80526. - Richard B. Russell, Jr., Professor of Public Policy, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods
    The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values The first edition of this important work was the winner of the 2002 Publication of Enduring Quality award by the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. The continuing premise for the book is that estimates of the economic values of environmental and natural resource services are essential for effective policy-making. Like previous editions, the third edition, which includes two additional co-authors, presents a comprehensive treatment of the theory and methods involved in estimating environmental benefits. Researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners will welcome the work as an up- to-date reference on recent developments. Students will gain a better understanding of the contribution that economics as a discipline can make to decisions concerning pollution control and human health, recreation, environmental amenities, and other critical issues concerning the way we use and interact with environmental and natural resource systems. To reflect recent progress in both the theory and practice of non-market valuation, this third edition includes more details on empirical approaches to measurement, expanded discussion of the reasons for divergence between “willingness to pay” and “willingness to accept compensation,” and increased coverage of econometric issues encountered in estimation. In keeping with its cutting-edge orientation, it also includes more discussion of survey design, equilibrium sorting models, and the implications of behavioral economics for welfare measurements and benefit cost analysis. A. Myrick Freeman III is William D. Shipman Professor of Economics Emeritus at Bowdoin College in Maine, USA, and a former Senior Fellow at Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington DC, USA. Joseph A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-Danish Trade in Wood Products and Illegal Logging in Russia
    TTThhheee RRRuuussssssiiiaaannn---DDDaaannniiissshhh tttrrraaadddeee iiinnn wwwooooooddd pprrroooddduuuccctttsss aaannnddd iiilllllleeegggaaalll llloooggggggiiinnnggg iiinnn RRRuuussssssiiiaaa WWF's Approach to Forest Conservation WWF's mission is to stop the degradation of the natural environment and build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature by: • Conserving the world's biological diversity; • Ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable; • Promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. The protection target is: The establishment and maintenance of viable, representative networks of protected areas in the world’s threatened and most biologically significant forest regions, by 2010. The forest management target is: 100 million ha of certified forests by 2005, distributed in a balanced manner among regions, forest types and land tenure regimes. The forest restoration target is: By 2005, undertake at least twenty forest landscape restoration initiatives in the world’s threatened, deforested or degraded forest regions to enhance ecological integrity and human well-being. Particular attention will also be paid to issues that cut across the targets, including threats (forest fires, illegal logging, climate change and conversion), policy issues (subsidies, trade barriers, investment flows) and opportunities (community forest management). Authors: Alexander Brukhanov ([email protected]) Andrei Ptichnikov ([email protected]) Anatoly Kotlobay ([email protected]) Alexander Voropayev ([email protected]) Editor: Jacob Andersen ([email protected]) December 2003 Photos on the cover: Top: Alexander Brukhanov Bottom: WWF Russia Any full or partial reproduction of this publication must include the title and give credit to the above- mentioned publisher as the copyright holder. No photographs from this publication may be reproduced without prior authorization from WWF Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Land Management Socioeconomics Program Guidance Economic Methods for Estimating Nonmarket Environmental Values
    Bureau of Land Management Socioeconomics Program Guidance Economic Methods for Estimating Nonmarket Environmental Values Purpose. This guidance describes when and how to use economic methods to estimate nonmarket environmental values when preparing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses for the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) resource management planning and other decision-making. These methods estimate the benefits individuals attribute to experiences of the environment, uses of natural resources, or the existence of particular ecological conditions that do not involve market transactions and therefore lack prices. At least a qualitative description of the most relevant nonmarket values should be included for the affected environment and the impacts of alternatives in NEPA analyses involving environmental impact statements (EIS), for both resource management plans (RMP) and project- level decisions. Such description may also be appropriate for inclusion in environmental assessments (EA). The use of quantitative valuation methods should contribute to the analysis of one or more issues to be addressed in the environmental analysis supporting planning or other decision-making. A quantitative analysis of nonmarket values in EIS-level NEPA analyses is strongly encouraged where one or more of the criteria provided below apply (see Criteria for Nonmarket Valuation). This guidance is directed to several audiences. For non-specialists, it explains the basic concepts of nonmarket valuation and provides direction on when and how such methods can best be used (see General Guidance). For economists and other socioeconomic specialists, it provides additional notes on the use of these methods (see Technical Guidance). The socioeconomics program is currently funding a series of field-based case studies on nonmarket economic valuation for resource management decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Environmental Goods and Services: a Case Study of Mexico
    couv 8-06-05 rouge 2ok 28/11/05 14:16 Page 4 October 2005 Trade and Environment ICTSD Project on Environmental Goods and Services Defining Environmental Goods and Services: A Case Study of Mexico The ICTSD project on Bridging Trade and Sustainable Development in Environmental Goods and Services aims at enhancing developing countries’ capacity to understand trade and sustainable development issue By Enrique Lendo linkages with respect to environmental goods and services and reflect regional perspectives and priori- Consultants in Environmental Strategy and Negotiations (COESNA) ties in regional and multilateral trade negotiations. The current phase of the project got underway in January 2005 and will continue until June 2006. Other project activities and resources include: ● Options for Liberalisation of Trade in Environmental Goods in the Doha Round. By Robert Howse and Petrus B. van Bork, November 2005. ● The Economics Of Trade In Environmental Services: The Implications For Developing Countries In The GATS. By Colin Kirkpatrick, forthcoming. ● Technology transfer Issues in environmental goods: Will the Doha Round of negotiations facilitate access? By Lynn Matelka, forthcoming. ● Latin American Consultation on Environmental Goods and Services, Diálogo regional sudamericano sobre bienes y servicios ambientales, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 1-2 June 2005. For further information, visit http://www.trade-environment.org/page/ictsd/projects/egs_desc.htm. One of the mandates of the CEC is to conduct an ongoing assessment of the environmental impacts of A study commissioned by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation trade liberalisation in North America. This assessment work shows that liberalised trading rules under NAFTA do not in and of themselves lead to the increased use of environmentally preferable products.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Role
    1 Russian Forest Management Under the Ministry of Natural Resources: 2 A historical review of Russian forest management and a look to the future 3 William E. Schlosser1 4 Victor K. Teplyakov2 5 Philip R. Wandschneider3 1 CEO & Vice President, Pacific Rim Taiga, Inc., PO Box 187, Pullman, WA 99163-0187, currently a Ph.D. student in the Program of Environmental Science and Regional Planning at Washington State University, contact author [email protected] 2 Forest Program Coordinator, IUCN – The World Conservation Union Office for CIS, 17 Martial Vasilevsky St., Moscow 123182, Russia. 3 Associate Professor, Washington State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, PO Box 646210, Pullman, 99164-6210 USA 1 Russian Forest Management Under the Ministry of Natural Resources: 2 A historical review of Russian forest management and a look to the future 3 Executive Summary 4 This manuscript discusses the historical context and current state of forest management in 5 the Russian Federation, and the establishment of forest management authority by the Ministry 6 of Natural Resources, its duties, mandates, and organizational hierarchy as it applies to forest 7 management. It will examine the implications to forest management in relation to Russia's role 8 in global climate change issues, harvest rates in the boreal forest, and targets for reforestation, 9 fire fighting, and infrastructure development. The evolution of a market economy in Russia will 10 be directly linked to the potential success of these forest management goals. 11 In brief, it is expected that forest management activities during the coming decades will 12 show a greater emphasis on timber extraction and fire protection of highly valued timber stands.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of the Impact of Climate Change in Agriculture In
    OXFAM RESEARCH REPORTS APRIL 2013 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE IN RUSSIA NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ASPECTS GEORGIY SAFONOV Director of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, National Research University Higher School of Economics YULIA SAFONOVA Member of the research team, Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, National Research University Higher School of Economics Climate change is already having a negative impact on agricultural production in Russia, especially grain production, since this sector is perhaps the most dependent on weather and climate factors. This report presents an economic evaluation of the impact of climate change on crop production at the national level and a long-term economic evaluation of the losses, profits, and risks for agriculture throughout Russia. It analyses the situation in the two the major agricultural regions, where the negative effects of climate change are especially pronounced, and examines the prospects for adapting Russia’s agriculture to climate change. Oxfam Research Reports are written to share research results, to contribute to public debate and to invite feedback on development and humanitarian policy and practice. They do not necessarily reflect Oxfam policy positions. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Oxfam. www.oxfam.org CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Peatlands, Greenhouse Gas Exchange and Climate Change M
    1 PEATLANDS AND CLIMATE CHANGE 2 3 PEATLANDS AND CLIMATE CHANGE EDITED BY MARIA STRACK 4 Cover Main photo: A fl ark fen in the northern aapa mire Luovuoma. Flarks and strings are the most essential elements of the mire centre. Photo Markku Mäkilä. Small photos: Upper row from left – Tropical peatland fi re. Photo by Marcel Silvius – Typical fl at palsa landscape. Photo by Markku Mäkilä – Ditching of peatland for forestry. Photo by Juhani Päivänen. Second row from left – Peatland used for agriculture. Photo by Hannu Salo – Peat extraction. Photo by Association of Finnish Peat Industries – Smoke plume from peatland fi re. Photo by M. Turetsky. Publisher International Peat Society, Vapaudenkatu 12, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland Edited by Dr. Maria Strack, University of Calgary, Canada Printed at Saarijärven Offset Oy, Saarijärvi, Finland This book is printed on G-Print 100G72104 paper. ISBN 978-952-99401-1-0 Copyright © 2008 by International Peat Society . All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced by any means, or transmitted, or translated into a machine language without the written permission of the publisher. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The human impact on global climate and the role of peatlands in this process has been widely studied and debated in media, but also within a scientifi c audience and peatland experts during recent years. Controversial opinions have been put and different parties and experts have emphasised their points of view with the latest research data, historical evidence and statistics. It seems that there is lack of fundamental cooperation on an international level to coordinate research efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Innovations in the Forest Industry in Russia: a Case Study of Irkutsk Province
    MISCELLANEA GEOGRAPHICA – REGIONAL STUDIES ON DEVELOPMENT Vol. 18 • No. 4 • 2014 • pp. 17-23 • ISSN: 2084-6118 • DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0027 Institutional innovations in the Forest industry in Russia: a case study of Irkutsk province Abstract Multiple global changes are impacting Russia today. Economic Dennis V. Dayneko1 transformations in Russia have prompted the establishment of new Eric J. Gustafson2 business relations, which are based on innovations in the economic, institutional and ecological spheres, including within the Forest industry. This paper focuses on the Forest sector in Irkutsk province and beyond, 1Irkutsk State Technical University examining the basic problems related to the institutional innovations in Irkutsk Science Center the Forest industry of the province, and the major factors and conditions SB RAS e-mail: [email protected] influencing the dynamics of institutional innovations. A brief historical background and analysis of institutional structures are also presented. 2Institute for Applied Ecosystem Studies Northern Research Station Keywords USDA Forest Service Irkutsk • Forest industry • innovations • institutional innovation • institutional e-mail: [email protected] changes • global changes © University of Warsaw – Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies Received: 30 October 2013 Accepted: 29 May 2014 Introduction “The abundant forest resources of Russia have global value, History of the Forest industry in Russia and Irkutsk province both economic, and ecological. They are a source of lumber Wood has been an important economic commodity in for Russia and all the world, they are a symbol of the wild Russia for hundreds of years, both for domestic consumption nature untouched, and play a crucial role in stabilization of and international trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Environmental Functions As a Tool in Planning, Management and Decision-Making
    Evaluation of environmental functions as a tool in planning, management and decision-making 'fifcJ-xA- '•'J>".ro-f McJi-C,el' Rudolf S. de Groot Rudolf Steven de Groot EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL FUNCTIONS AS A TOOL IN PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND DECISION-MAKING Proefschrift ter verkrijging van degraa d vandocto r in delandbouw - en milieuwetenschappen op gezag vand erecto r magnificus, dr. C.M.Karssen , in hetopenbaa r te verdedigen op vrijdag 30 september 1994 des namiddags te vier uuri nd e Aula van de Landbouwuniversiteit te Wageningen. Stellingen Stellingen behorende bij het proefschrift van Rudolf S. de Groot: "Evaluation of Environmental Functions as a Tool in Planning, Management and Decision making" Wageningen, .30 september 1994 1. Bij de afweging van de vele belangen die een rol spelen bij de besluitvorming rond economische ontwikkeling en ruimtelijke ordening wordt het (economisch) belang van natuurlijke ecosystemen nog steeds onderschat. 2. Verandering in een bepaalde milieu-eigenschap (bijv. luchtkwaliteit) heeft vaak ingrijpende, en deels nog onbegrepen, consequenties voor het functioneren van hele ecosystemen. Voor het inzichtelijk maken van de vele terugkoppelingsmechanismen in de natuur is functie-analyse een nuttig hulpmiddel en onderstreept het belang van systeem-ecologisch onderzoek. 3. De jaarlijkse baten (monetair en anderszins) van de functies van een ecosysteem of natuurgebied zouden gezien moeten worden als de "rente" op dit "natuurlijk kapitaal"; kennis over de ecologische én economisch waarde van het natuurlijk kapitaal kan derhalve een nieuwe invulling geven aan het begrip "goed rentmeesterschap". 4. 'Natuurbehoud is zelfbehoud' is geen originele, maar wel een juiste stelling. 5. De "externe" kosten van bijv.
    [Show full text]