DOCSLIB.ORG

Personal Genomes and Ethical Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Personal Genomes and Ethical Issues Personal Genomes and Ethical Issues 02-223 How to Analyze Your Own Genome Declining Cost of Genome Sequencing • The genome sequencing is expected to happen rouAnely in the near future Schadt, MSB, 2012 The era of big data: the genome data are already being collected in a large scale and being mined for scienAfic discovery to drive more accurate descripAve and predicAve models that inform decision making for the best diagnosis and treatment choice for a given paent. Would you post your genome on the web? Genomes and Privacy • DNA sequence data contain informaon that can be used to uniquely idenAfy an individual (i.e., genome sequences are like fingerprints) • Balancing the need for scienAfic study and privacy Genomes and Privacy • Privacy concerns – Genome sequence data and other related types of data (gene expressions, clinical records, epigeneAc data, etc.) are collected for a large number of paents for medical research – Most types of data are freely available through internet except for genotype data • NCBI GEO database for gene expression data • The cancer genome atlas data portals – Genotype data are available to scienAsts through restricted access – ProtecAng parAcipants’ privacy through informed consent hWps://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaHome2.jsp The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Data The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Data hWps://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaCancerDetails.jsp? diseaseType=LAML&diseaseName=Acute%20Myeloid%20Leukemia Access Control for TCGA Data • Open access data Aer – De-idenAfied clinical and demographic data – Gene expression data – Copy-number alteraons in regions of the genome – EpigeneAc data – Summaries of data, such as genotype frequencies, compiled across individuals • Controlled-access data Aer – Individual germline variant data – DNA sequence data – One should apply for an access to the data through NIH (database of genotypes and phenotypes) Informed Consent for Scientific Research • Standard pracAce for enrolling human subjects in a research study – fully informing potenAal parAcipants on all aspects of a study including the aims of the study, risks, benefits, costs, and protecAon of personal privacy – The origins of modern day informed consent for medical research can be traced to the Nuremberg Code in 1947 in an effort to protect parAcipants in research studies (Homan, 1991). Nuremberg Code • Research ethics principles for human experimentaon • Established aer the Nuremberg Trials at the end of the Second World War hp://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html Nuremberg Code • On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal in the case of the USA vs. Karl Brandt et. al. delivered their verdict. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult quesAon of medical experimentaon on human beings. Several German doctors had argued in their own defense that their experiments differed liWle from previous American or German ones. Furthermore they showed that no internaonal law or informal statement differenAated between legal and illegal human experimentaon. This argument worried Drs. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, American doctors who had worked with the prosecuAon during the trial. On April 17, 1947, Dr. Alexander submiWed a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes which outlined six points defining legiAmate research. The verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a secAon enAtled "Permissible Medical Experiments" and revised the original six points into ten. Subsequently, the ten points became known as the "Nuremberg Code." Although the code addressed the defense arguments in general, remarkably none of the specific findings against Brandt and his codefendants menAoned the code. Thus the legal force of the document was not well established. The uncertain use of the code conAnued in the half century following the trial when it informed numerous internaonal ethics statements but failed to find a place in either the American or German naonal law codes. Nevertheless, it remains a landmark document on medical ethics and one of the most lasAng products of the "Doctors Trial." hWp://www.ushmm.org/informaon/exhibiAons/online-features/special-focus/doctors-trial/ nuremberg-code Institutional Review Board (IRB) • A commiWee that has been formally designated to approve, monitor, and review biomedical and behavioral research involving humans • Title 45 Code of Federal Regulaons Part 46 – hWp://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html Current Generation Informed Consents • Single study focused • Top-down unidirecAonal researcher-parAcipant (research subject) relaonship. • ProtecAng the parAcipant is considered among the chief aims • Data generaon on study parAcipants usually an integral part of the consent • Data ownership and terms of use driven by the invesAgator and/or hosAng insAtuAon • Study parAcipants are counseled to ensure they understand all aspects of the study, although no evidence of understanding is sought or required • In most cases, anonymity, privacy, and confidenAality are guaranteed as a key condiAon for a parAcipant’s consent • Big data, more open data sharing mentality demand a new generaon of informed consents Genomes and Privacy • How much should we be concerned about the privacy issues regarding personal genome data? • Non-geneAc data can be used to predict the genotypes of individuals (Bayesian method to predict individual SNP genotypes from gene expression data, Schadt et al. Nature GeneAcs, 2012) – Uses gene expressions as non-geneAc data and predicts the genotypes based on the gene expressions Predicting Genotypes with Non-Genetic Data (Schadt et al., 2012) • Study design – Learn a predicAve model for predicAng genotypes given gene expression data from training set – Use the learned predicAve model to test whether genotype can be predicted correctly given gene expression from test set • Two datasets from non-overlapping groups of individuals – the human liver cohort (HLC): liver gene expression and genotype data for 378 European- American individuals – Roux-en-Y gastric bypass cohort (RYGB): genotype data and expression data for liver and adipose Assue from 580 European-American subjects undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) • Learn model from HLC data (training set) and predict RYGB genotypes given RYGB expressions (test set) Predicting Genotypes from Gene Expressions • Led semicircle: observed genotypes • Right semicircle: predicted genotype • Blue line: correctly matched individuals • White line: incorrectly matched individuals • Overall, we can resolve 99% of the idenes of individuals Personal Genome Project (www.personalgenomes.org) • Volunteers from the general public working together with researchers to advance personal genomics • Aims to sequence genomes of 100,000 individuals from the general public • Volunteers should be willing to make their geneAc and trait informaon publicly available The Evolving Informed Consent for Scientific Research I • Open consents for public resources - the Personal Genome Project (PGP) Consent (Church, 2005; Lunshof et al, 2008) • Differs from classic informed consent in the following ways – Data ownership and terms of use of data no longer driven by study invesgator – Data are published to the web and made available without restricAon – Single-study focused, but has broad and open-ended scope (data sharing as an aim) – ParAcipants agree to reciprocal interacAon with researchers – ParAcipants must pass an exam to ensure they possess basic geneAc literacy, are informed about the public nature of the study, understand the possibility of re-idenAficaon, and that some risks are unknown and unpredictable. The Evolving Informed Consent for Scientific Research II • Interoperable and Open Consents - The Portable Legal Consent (PLC) (hWp://weconsent.us/) • Based upon the PGP consent, but altered in the following important ways – The PLC can be used across any number of studies – If variaons of the same PLC form guarantee the same freedoms and creates no more than the same obligaons, then it can be cerAfied as interoperable across the PLC network – Fully digital, requires no input from a physician or other health/ research professional – Requires users sign terms of a contract to ensure compliance with data use terms – Intended for data already generated to enable open access of data across many studies Other Issues in Scientific Research • Open personal data environment • A greater parAcipaon of informed paents • ProtecAng individuals from discriminaon – GeneAc Informaon Nondiscriminaon Act (2008) • Law protecAng individuals from discriminaon based on their geneAc informaon for health insurance and employment Other Social/Ethical Issues in Personal Genomes • Consumer genomics services – 23andme, deCODE genecs, Navigenics – Personal genomic services are offered in the private sectors more widely than by clinicians – Commercial genomic services may displace clinicians as the primary provider of health-related geneAc informaon – Individuals may assume more responsibility for health-promoAng behavior Other Social/Ethical Issues in Personal Genomes • P4 medicine (hp://p4mi.org) – PredicAve, prevenAve, personalized, and parAcipatory medicine – Apply systems biology to personalized disease prevenAon and maintenance of health Summary • Ethical/Social/Legal issues in personal genomes – ProtecAng privacy in terms of geneAc informaon while enabling scienAfic research – ProtecAng individuals from discriminaon based on geneAc informaon – Empowering individuals by keeping them informed of the various issues involved in personal genomes .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attitudes Towards Personal Genomics Among Older Swiss Adults: an Exploratory Study
    Research Collection Journal Article Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study Author(s): Mählmann, Laura; Röcke, Christina; Brand, Angela; Hafen, Ernst; Vayena, Effy Publication Date: 2016 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000114241 Originally published in: Applied and Translational Genomics 8, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.009 Rights / License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library Applied & Translational Genomics 8 (2016) 9–15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied & Translational Genomics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atg Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: An exploratory study Laura Mählmann a,b, Christina Röcke c, Angela Brand b, Ernst Hafen a,EffyVayenad,⁎ a Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich, Auguste-Piccard-Hof 1, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland b Institute for Public Health Genomics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands c University Research Priority Program “Dynamics of Healthy Aging”, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15/Box 2, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland d Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Institute of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland article info abstract Objectives: To explore attitudes of Swiss older adults towards personal genomics (PG). Keywords: Personal genomics Methods: Using an anonymized voluntary paper-and-pencil survey, data were collected from 151 men and Attitudes of older adults women aged 60–89 years attending the Seniorenuniversität Zurich, Switzerland (Seniors' University).
    [Show full text]
  • In Human-Computer Interaction Published, Sold and Distributed By: Now Publishers Inc
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000067 Communicating Personal Genomic Information to Non-experts: A New Frontier for Human-Computer Interaction Orit Shaer Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA [email protected] Oded Nov New York University, USA [email protected] Lauren Westendorf Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA [email protected] Madeleine Ball Open Humans Foundation, Boston, MA, USA [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000067 Foundations and Trends R in Human-Computer Interaction Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is O. Shaer, O. Nov, L. Wstendorf, and M. Ball. Communicating Personal Genomic Information to Non-experts: A New Frontier for Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends R in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–62, 2017. R This Foundations and Trends issue was typeset in LATEX using a class file designed by Neal Parikh. Printed on acid-free paper. ISBN: 978-1-68083-254-9 c 2017 O. Shaer, O. Nov, L. Wstendorf, and M. Ball All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers. Photocopying. In the USA: This journal is registered at the Copyright Clearance Cen- ter, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923.
    [Show full text]
  • Multigenic Condition Risk Assessment in Direct-To-Consumer Genomic Services Melanie Swan, MBA
    ARTICLE Multigenic condition risk assessment in direct-to-consumer genomic services Melanie Swan, MBA Purpose: Gene carrier status and pharmacogenomic data may be de- November 2009, cover 127, 46, and 28 conditions for $429, $985, tectable from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), but SNP-based and $999, respectively. These 3 services allow consumers to down- research concerning multigenic common disease such as diabetes, can- load their raw genotyping data, which can then be reviewed in 1 cers, and cardiovascular disease is an emerging field. The many SNPs other genome browsers such as the wiki-based SNPedia, where and loci that may relate to common disease have not yet been compre- there are 35 publicly available whole and partial human genomes hensively identified and understood scientifically. In the interim, direct- as of November 2009. Pathway Genomics and Gene Essence have to-consumer (DTC) genomic companies have forged ahead in develop- launched more recently, in mid-2009, and cover 71 and 84 condi- ing composite risk interpretations for multigenic conditions. It is useful tions for $299 and $1,195 respectively. SeqWright also provides a to understand how variance in risk interpretation may arise. Methods: basic service, genotyping 1 million SNPs for $998. 23andMe, A comprehensive study was conducted to analyze the 213 conditions deCODEme, and Pathway Genomics provide 2 services, health covered by the 5 identifiable genome-wide DTC genomic companies, and ancestry testing. Not a lot is known about the overall DTC and the total SNPs (401) and loci (224) assessed in the 20 common genomic testing market size; however, 23andMe reported having 2 disease conditions with the greatest overlapping coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Genomics for Bioinformaticians
    Personal Genomics for Bioinformaticians Instructor: Melissa Gymrek Audience: UCSD grad students (Ph.D. and M.Sc. students) Objective: Given someone’s genome, what could you learn? (Students are encouraged to analyze their own 23&Me data). Student backgrounds: • Computer Science and Engineering • Electrical Engineering • Bioinformatics • Biomedical Sciences Modules: • Introduction to personal genomics • Ancestry • Complex traits • NGS • Mutation hunting Course Resources Course website: https://gymreklab.github.io/teaching/personal_genomics/personal_genomics_2017.html Syllabus: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/cse291personalgenomics/genome_course_syllabus_winter17.pdf Materials for generating problem sets: https://github.com/gymreklab/personal-genomics-course-2017 Contact: [email protected] Bioinforma)cs/Genomics Courses @UCLA ¤ h"p://www.bioinformacs.ucla.edu/graduate-courses/ ¤ h"p://www.bioinformacs.ucla.edu/undergraduate-courses/ ¤ All courses require 1 year of programming, a probability course ¤ 3 courses are combined Graduate and Undergraduate Courses ¤ Undergraduate Courses enrollment are primarily students from Computer Science and Undergradaute Bioinformacs Minor (Mostly Life Science Students) ¤ Graduate Enrollment is mostly from Bioinformacs Ph.D. program, Gene0cs and Genomics Ph.D. program, CS Ph.D. Program. ¤ 3 courses are only Graduate Courses ¤ Enrollment is mostly Bioinformacs Ph.D. program and CS Ph.D. Program ¤ Courses are taught by faculty in Computer Science or Stas0cs (or have joint appointments there) Bioinforma)cs/Genomics Courses @UCLA ¤ CM221. Introduc0on to Bioinformacs ¤ Taught by Christopher Lee ¤ Focuses on Classical Bioinformacs Problems and Stas0cal Inference ¤ CM222. Algorithms in Bioinformacs ¤ Taught by Eleazar Eskin ¤ Focuses on Algorithms in Sequencing ¤ CM224. Computaonal Gene0cs ¤ Taught by Eran Halperin ¤ Focuses on Stas0cal Gene0cs and Machine Learning Methods ¤ CM225. Computaonal Methods in Genomics ¤ Taught by Jason Ernst and Bogdan Pasaniuc ¤ Has component of reading recent papers ¤ CM226.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Genomic Information Management and Personalized Medicine: Challenges, Current Solutions, and Roles of HIM Professionals
    Personal Genomic Information Management and Personalized Medicine: Challenges, Current Solutions, and Roles of HIM Professionals Personal Genomic Information Management and Personalized Medicine: Challenges, Current Solutions, and Roles of HIM Professionals by Amal Alzu’bi, MS; Leming Zhou, PhD; and Valerie Watzlaf, PhD, RHIA, FAHIMA Abstract In recent years, the term personalized medicine has received more and more attention in the field of healthcare. The increasing use of this term is closely related to the astonishing advancement in DNA sequencing technologies and other high-throughput biotechnologies. A large amount of personal genomic data can be generated by these technologies in a short time. Consequently, the needs for managing, analyzing, and interpreting these personal genomic data to facilitate personalized care are escalated. In this article, we discuss the challenges for implementing genomics-based personalized medicine in healthcare, current solutions to these challenges, and the roles of health information management (HIM) professionals in genomics-based personalized medicine. Introduction Personalized medicine utilizes personal medical information to tailor strategies and medications for diagnosing and treating diseases in order to maintain people’s health.1 In this medical practice, physicians combine results from all available patient data (such as symptoms, traditional medical test results, medical history and family history, and certain personal genomic information) so that they can make accurate diagnoses and determine
    [Show full text]
  • Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations Kiara V. Whitley , Josie A. Tueller and K. Scott Weber * Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 4007 Life Sciences Building, 701 East University Parkway, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] (K.V.W.); [email protected] (J.A.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-801-422-6259 Received: 31 December 2019; Accepted: 22 January 2020; Published: 24 January 2020 Abstract: Since the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, genomic sequencing has become a prominent tool used by diverse disciplines in modern science. In the past 20 years, the cost of genomic sequencing has decreased exponentially,making it affordable and accessible. Bioinformatic and biological studies have produced significant scientific breakthroughs using the wealth of genomic information now available. Alongside the scientific benefit of genomics, companies offer direct-to-consumer genetic testing which provide health, trait, and ancestry information to the public. A key area that must be addressed is education about what conclusions can be made from this genomic information and integrating genomic education with foundational genetic principles already taught in academic settings. The promise of personal genomics providing disease treatment is exciting, but many challenges remain to validate genomic predictions and diagnostic correlations. Ethical and societal concerns must also be addressed regarding how personal genomic information is used. This genomics revolution provides a powerful opportunity to educate students, clinicians, and the public on scientific and ethical issues in a personal way to increase learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Genomics Wynn K Meyer, Phd Bioscience in the 21St Century Lehigh University November 18, 2019 Draw Your Genome
    Personal Genomics Wynn K Meyer, PhD Bioscience in the 21st Century Lehigh University November 18, 2019 Draw your genome. On your drawing, please label: • The region(s) that can help you figure out where your ancestors lived. • The region(s) that determine whether you will fall asleep in this class. • The region(s) that determine your eye color. • The region(s) that determine your skin color. • The region(s) that contribute to your risk of cancer. Guessing is fine! What does your drawing look like? Public domain photo / NASA] Courtesy: National Human Genome Research Institute [Public domain] If things were simple: Heart disease Eye color Skin color Cancer Stroke Diabetes Arthritis Courtesy: National Human Genome Research Institute [Public domain] Why not? How do we link phenotypes with the genetic variants that underlie them? Arthritis Heart disease Cancer Skin color Diabetes Stroke Eye color What are genetic variants? The term “allele” can refer either Zoom WAY in… to the nucleotide at the SNP Allele 1 (A/G or T/A) … …TTGACCCGTTATTG… or to the combination across both SNPs (AT/GA). …TTGGCCCGTTATAG… Allele 2 Either way, it represents one “version” of the sequence. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms The combination of alleles that a (SNPs) person has at a SNP is called a genotype. What process generates SNPs? E.g., for SNP1: AA, AG, and GG. What do genetic variants do? Mostly nothing! From the 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (Nature 2015): • We find that a typical genome differs from Why? the reference human genome at 4.1 million to 5.0 million sites (out of 3.2 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Report: “Metagenomics, Metadata and Meta-Analysis” (M3) Workshop at the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2010
    Standards in Genomic Sciences (2010) 2:357-360 DOI:10.4056/sigs.802738 Meeting Report: “Metagenomics, Metadata and Meta-analysis” (M3) Workshop at the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2010 Lynette Hirschman1, Peter Sterk2,3, Dawn Field2, John Wooley4, Guy Cochrane5, Jack Gilbert6, Eugene Kolker7, Nikos Kyrpides8, Folker Meyer9, Ilene Mizrachi10, Yasukazu Nakamura11, Susanna-Assunta Sansone5, Lynn Schriml12, Tatiana Tatusova10, Owen White12 and Pelin Yilmaz13 1 Information Technology Center, The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA 2 NERC Center for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK 3 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK 4 University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 5 European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), Hinxton, Cambridge, UK 6 Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Plymouth, UK 7 Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA 8 Genome Biology Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA 9 Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, USA 10 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 11 DNA Data Bank of Japan, National Institute of Genetics, Yata, Mishima, Japan 12 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA 13 Microbial Genomics Group, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology & Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany This report summarizes the M3 Workshop held at the January 2010 Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. The workshop, organized by Genomic Standards Consortium members, in- cluded five contributed talks, a series of short presentations from stakeholders in the genom- ics standards community, a poster session, and, in the evening, an open discussion session to review current projects and examine future directions for the GSC and its stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • The ELSI Advisory Board GP-Write/ the Center of Excellence For
    ! The ELSI Advisory Board GP-write/ The Center of Excellence for Engineering Biology Background Information on GP-write, with ELSI dimensions The Genome Project-write (GP-write) is an open, international research project led by a multi- disciplinary group of scientific leaders who will oversee a reduction in the costs of engineering and testing large genomes, including a human genome, in cell lines by over 1,000-fold within ten years. The overarching goal of such an effort is to further our understanding of the blueprint for life provided by the Human Genome Project (HGP-read) by developing new technologies and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering, as well as transformative medical applications. GP-write will include whole genome engineering of human cell lines and other organisms of significance to research and development, agriculture, and public health, as well as organoids derived from human cells. A coordinated scientific effort to understand, discuss, and apply large genome editing technologies is timely, and public discourse regarding such an endeavor is both expected and encouraged as GP-write gets underway. However, responsible innovation requires having more than ELSI discussions; it also involves identifying common goals important to scientists and the public through timely and detailed consultation among diverse stakeholders. The GP-write effort is aimed at technology development and knowledge creation, with the ultimate goal of improving life on Earth. Potential innovations relate to biomedical therapies, food supply management, biofuels, and public health. However, as with many other technology development initiatives, there is potential for misuse, and some risks may be unforeseen.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Future? How Genetic Testing Will Impact Life Insurance
    Seeing the future? How genetic testing will impact life insurance Table of contents Abstract 2 The evolution of genetic testing 3 Clinical genetic testing 5 The DTC genetic testing market 6 Insurance and genetic testing 8 Family history data protection 12 Health incentives for insurance clients 13 Increasing anti-selection exposure 14 Conclusion 15 Swiss Re Seeing the future? 1 Abstract The cost of sequencing an individual’s genome has fallen exponentially, so that genetics has started to become an integral part of clinical practice. This has provided physicians with a valuable diagnostic and in some cases a predictive pre-symptomatic tool, which they can use more effectively to manage patients’ diseases and even take preventive actions. The exponential fall in the price of genome analysis tools has also led to the robust growth of a direct-to-consumer market (DTC), allowing individuals to access quickly and cheaply their genetic profile. Insurers broadly welcome the increased clinical use of genetic services, as it can result in effective personalised treatments and preventive actions taken for patients. Insurers are, however, aware that there are some risks with the increased availability of genetic information. Most prominent of these is an information asymmetry. If individuals have access to genetic data that their insurer does not, it could be the basis of non-disclosure and anti-selection. Moreover, the effects of anti-selection could be amplified by different regulatory approaches to the use and disclosure of genetic tests for underwriting purposes. This paper frames the concerns of the insurance industry, and how important the right approach and incentives will be in ensuring the effective use of genetic data in health and insurance contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Genomics Lecture Slides
    Genomics, Bioinformatics & Medicine http://biochem158.stanford.edu/ Personal Genomics http://biochem158.stanford.edu/Personal%20Genomics.html The Lancet 2010, 375: 1525-1535. Doug Brutlag Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry & Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine © Doug Brutlag 2015 Genetic Penetrance of Inherited Diseases • Many inherited diseases are Mendelian and highly penetrant – Sickle cell disease – Thalassemias – Huntington’s disease – Color blindness – Cystic fbrosis • Most common diseases are complex (multifactorial - caused by multiple genes or multiple pathways as well as multiple environmental factors) and of low penetrance – Familial – Predisposition to disease – Very large environmental and/or behavioral component • Type I diabetes and other autoimmune diseases (lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, hyperthyroidism, Crohn’s disease, Celiac Sprue, irritable bowel disease etc.) • Type 2 diabetes • Coronary heart disease (atherosclerosis) • Asthma, COPD, pulmonary fbrosis – Many complex diseases can be avoided with diet, nutrition, exercise or behavioral modifcation – Many complex diseases can also be monitored by increased vigilance (another behavioral modifcation) © Doug Brutlag 2015 So What Can We Learn from Personal Genomics? • Disease risk for common diseases – Genetic predisposition towards a disease (relative risk or odds ratio) – Genetic versus environmental contributions to disease (penetrance) – How to alter your environment and behavior to avoid or detect the disease • Disease Carrier status – Premarital genetic
    [Show full text]
  • PERSONAL GENOMICS 1. Introduction Until Just Recently
    September 21, 2009 16:41 WSPC - Proceedings Trim Size: 11in x 8.5in sessionintro Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 15:302-304(2010) 1 PERSONAL GENOMICS Can Alkan Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Seattle, WA, 98195, USA Michael Brudno Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON, M5S 3G4, Canada Evan E. Eichler Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Seattle, WA, 98195, USA Maricel G. Kann Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County. Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA S. Cenk Sahinalp School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada 1. Introduction Until just recently, bioinformaticians and genomicists did not have access to genomic data from multiple human individuals or many different species due to labor intensiveness and limitations of targeted approaches such as array comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH), PCR, SNP microarrays and similar assays, and the cost of cloning based traditional sequencing technology. This restricted our understanding of the evolution of species as well as normal and disease-causing genetic variation between different individuals of the same species. Recent improvements in sequencing methods introduced high-throughput, low-cost and cloning-free (thus less labor-intensive) technologies such as pyrosequencing (Roche 454), sequencing by synthesis (Illumina), sequencing by ligation (AB SOLiD), single-molecule sequencing (HeliScope), and many others. The revolution in DNA sequencing opened many possibilities for researchers working in the fields of evolution, genetic variation, diseases of genomic origin, and even personalized medicine. The reduced cost for whole-genome resequencing prompted a large-scale genome variation study called the 1000 Genomes Project∗ that aims to sequence the genomes of approximately more than 1000 individuals from different populations to build the most extensive genetic variation database to date.
    [Show full text]