A Compendium to Marchantiophyta and Anthocerotophyta of Assam, India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Inventorization of Marchantiophyta in Barail Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India with Special Reference to Their Microhabitat
Marchantiophyta in Barail Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India 1 Inventorization of Marchantiophyta in Barail Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India with special reference to their microhabitat Sudipa Das1, 2 and G.D.Sharma1, 3 1Department of Life Science & Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar 788 011. Assam, India. 2Corresponding Author’s E-mail: [email protected] 3Present Address: Bilaspur University, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 495 009. India. Abstract: Das, S. & Sharma, G. D. (2013): Inventorization of Marchantiophyta in Barail Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India with special reference to their microhabitat. Barail Wildlife Sanctuary (BWS) lies amidst the tropical forests of the state Assam, India between the coordinates 24o58' – 25o5' North latitudes and 92o46' – 92o52' East longitudes. It covers an area of about 326.24 sq. km. with the altitude ranging from 100 – 1850 m. An ongoing study on the group Marchantiophyta (liverworts, bryophyta) of BWS reveals the presence of 42 species belonging to 24 genera and 14 families. Among these, one genus (Conocephalum Hill) and 13 species are recorded as new for the state of Assam, eight species have been found which are endemic to India, seven species are recorded as rare and one species, Heteroscyphus pandei S.C. Srivast. & Abha Srivast. as threatened within the study area. Out of 24 genera identified, 46% have been found growing purely as terrestrials, 25% as purely epiphytes and 29% have been found to grow both as terrestrials as well as epiphytes. Among these, a diverse and interesting range of microhabitats have also been observed for each taxon. It has been found that genera having vast range of microhabitats comprise large percentage of the total liverwort flora of BWS. -
Checklist of the Liverworts and Hornworts of the Interior Highlands of North America in Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri and Oklahoma
Checklist of the Liverworts and Hornworts of the Interior Highlands of North America In Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri and Oklahoma Stephen L. Timme T. M. Sperry Herbarium ‐ Biology Pittsburg State University Pittsburg, Kansas 66762 and 3 Bowness Lane Bella Vista, AR 72714 [email protected] Paul Redfearn, Jr. 5238 Downey Ave. Independence, MO 64055 Introduction Since the last publication of a checklist of liverworts and hornworts of the Interior Highlands (1997)), many new county and state records have been reported. To make the checklist useful, it was necessary to update it since its last posting. The map of the Interior Highlands of North America that appears in Redfearn (1983) does not include the very southeast corner of Kansas. However, the Springfield Plateau encompasses some 88 square kilometers of this corner of the state and includes limestone and some sandstone and shale outcrops. The vegetation is typical Ozarkian flora, dominated by oak and hickory. This checklist includes liverworts and hornworts collected from Cherokee County, Kansas. Most of what is known for the area is the result of collections by R. McGregor published in 1955. The majority of his collections are deposited in the herbarium at the New York Botanical Garden (NY). This checklist only includes the region defined as the Interior Highlands of North America. This includes the Springfield Plateau, Salem Plateau, St. Francois Mountains, Boston Mountains, Arkansas Valley, Ouachita Mountains and Ozark Hills. It encompasses much of southern Missouri south of the Missouri River, southwest Illinois; most of Arkansas except the Mississippi Lowlands and the Coastal Plain, the extreme southeastern corner of Kansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig. -
Systematic Studies on Bryophytes of Northern Western Ghats in Kerala”
1 “Systematic studies on Bryophytes of Northern Western Ghats in Kerala” Final Report Council order no. (T) 155/WSC/2010/KSCSTE dtd. 13.09.2010 Principal Investigator Dr. Manju C. Nair Research Fellow Prajitha B. Malabar Botanical Garden Kozhikode-14 Kerala, India 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Dr. K.R. Lekha, Head, WSC, Kerala State Council for Science Technology & Environment (KSCSTE), Sasthra Bhavan, Thiruvananthapuram for sanctioning the project to me. I am thankful to Dr. R. Prakashkumar, Director, Malabar Botanical Garden for providing the facilities and for proper advice and encouragement during the study. I am sincerely thankful to the Manager, Educational Agency for sanctioning to work in this collaborative project. I also accord my sincere thanks to the Principal for providing mental support during the present study. I extend my heartfelt thanks to Dr. K.P. Rajesh, Asst. Professor, Zamorin’s Guruvayurappan College for extending all help and generous support during the field study and moral support during the identification period. I am thankful to Mr. Prasobh and Mr. Sreenivas, Administrative section of Malabar Botanical Garden for completing the project within time. I am thankful to Ms. Prajitha, B., Research Fellow of the project for the collection of plant specimens and for taking photographs. I am thankful to Mr. Anoop, K.P. Mr. Rajilesh V. K. and Mr. Hareesh for the helps rendered during the field work and for the preparation of the Herbarium. I record my sincere thanks to the Kerala Forest Department for extending all logical support and encouragement for the field study and collection of specimens. -
Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae
Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Metzgeriales: Aneuraceae. Chapt. 1-11. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 1-11-1 Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 11 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-11: AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER METZGERIALES: ANEURACEAE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCLASS METZGERIIDAE ........................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Order Metzgeriales............................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneuraceae ................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-2 Aneura maxima ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-11-2 Aneura mirabilis .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-11-7 Aneura pinguis .......................................................................................................................................................... -
Mitochondrial Genomes of the Early Land Plant Lineage
Dong et al. BMC Genomics (2019) 20:953 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6365-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Mitochondrial genomes of the early land plant lineage liverworts (Marchantiophyta): conserved genome structure, and ongoing low frequency recombination Shanshan Dong1,2, Chaoxian Zhao1,3, Shouzhou Zhang1, Li Zhang1, Hong Wu2, Huan Liu4, Ruiliang Zhu3, Yu Jia5, Bernard Goffinet6 and Yang Liu1,4* Abstract Background: In contrast to the highly labile mitochondrial (mt) genomes of vascular plants, the architecture and composition of mt genomes within the main lineages of bryophytes appear stable and invariant. The available mt genomes of 18 liverwort accessions representing nine genera and five orders are syntenous except for Gymnomitrion concinnatum whose genome is characterized by two rearrangements. Here, we expanded the number of assembled liverwort mt genomes to 47, broadening the sampling to 31 genera and 10 orders spanning much of the phylogenetic breadth of liverworts to further test whether the evolution of the liverwort mitogenome is overall static. Results: Liverwort mt genomes range in size from 147 Kb in Jungermanniales (clade B) to 185 Kb in Marchantiopsida, mainly due to the size variation of intergenic spacers and number of introns. All newly assembled liverwort mt genomes hold a conserved set of genes, but vary considerably in their intron content. The loss of introns in liverwort mt genomes might be explained by localized retroprocessing events. Liverwort mt genomes are strictly syntenous in genome structure with no structural variant detected in our newly assembled mt genomes. However, by screening the paired-end reads, we do find rare cases of recombination, which means multiple concurrent genome structures may exist in the vegetative tissues of liverworts. -
Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012. -
Notes on Early Land Plants Today. 26. Miscellaneous Synonyms in Liverworts (Marchantiophyta)
Phytotaxa 81 (1): 3–7 (2013) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press Correspondence ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.81.1.2 Notes on Early Land Plants Today. 26. Miscellaneous synonyms in liverworts (Marchantiophyta) S. ROBBERT GRADSTEIN Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Dept. Systématique et Evolution, Case Postale 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France; [email protected] The identity of Aneura bipinnata (Sw.) Nees and its β flabellifera (Nees) Nees Aneura bipinnata (≡ Riccardia bipinnata, described from Jamaica as Jungermannia bipinnata (“2-pinnata“) by Olof Swartz (1788, 1806), is one of the oldest names in Aneuraceae and one of the poorest known. Swartz' original description and the brief diagnosis in Synopsis Hepaticarum (Gottsche et al. 1846) are the only available descriptions for the species. Stephani (1899) was unable to locate material of Aneura bipinnata and listed the species without description in his Species Hepaticarum. Swartz (1806) compared his Jungermannia bipinnata with Jungermannia multifida (≡ Riccardia multifida), a widespread Holarctic species. My study of the holotype material of Jungermannia bipinnata kept in S revealed that the species is identical to R. multifida and a synonym of the latter. Characteristic are the creeping to somewhat procumbent, several cm long shoots with regularly 2(-3)-pinnate branching, the linear, broadly winged branches and the swollen, biconvex main axis with or without a narrow wing. The Swartz collection constitutes the only known record of R. multifida from Jamaica (Söderström et al. 2011) and from the Caribbean as a whole. -
Risk Assessment for Invasiveness Differs for Aquatic and Terrestrial Plant Species
Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0002-2 ORIGINAL PAPER Risk assessment for invasiveness differs for aquatic and terrestrial plant species Doria R. Gordon • Crysta A. Gantz Received: 10 November 2010 / Accepted: 16 April 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Predictive tools for preventing introduc- non-invaders and invaders would require an increase tion of new species with high probability of becoming in the threshold score from the standard of 6 for this invasive in the U.S. must effectively distinguish non- system to 19. That higher threshold resulted in invasive from invasive species. The Australian Weed accurate identification of 89% of the non-invaders Risk Assessment system (WRA) has been demon- and over 75% of the major invaders. Either further strated to meet this requirement for terrestrial vascu- testing for definition of the optimal threshold or a lar plants. However, this system weights aquatic separate screening system will be necessary for plants heavily toward the conclusion of invasiveness. accurately predicting which freshwater aquatic plants We evaluated the accuracy of the WRA for 149 non- are high risks for becoming invasive. native aquatic species in the U.S., of which 33 are major invaders, 32 are minor invaders and 84 are Keywords Aquatic plants Á Australian Weed Risk non-invaders. The WRA predicted that all of the Assessment Á Invasive Á Prevention major invaders would be invasive, but also predicted that 83% of the non-invaders would be invasive. Only 1% of the non-invaders were correctly identified and Introduction 16% needed further evaluation. The resulting overall accuracy was 33%, dominated by scores for invaders. -
The Bryological Times Number 108 January 2003
_____________________________________________________________________________________________The Bryological Times Number 108 January 2003 Newsletter of the International Association of Bryologists CONTENT Obituary • Elsa Nyholm (1911 – 2002)............................................................................................................................................ pg 2 • Jerzy Szweykowski and Alicia Szweykowska ............................................................................................................ pg 2 Literature Column • Die Moose Baden-Wüttembergs ................................................................................................................................. pg 3 • Key to the Genera of Australian Mosses .................................................................................................................... pg 3 • Herzogia copies for sale ................................................................................................................................................ pg 4 • Field Guide to the Liverwort Genera of Pacific North America ............................................................................... pg 4 • J. Hedwig “Fundamentum historiae naturalis muscorum frondosorum” Facsimilé ........................................... pg 4 Theses in Bryology ............................................................................................................................................................. pg 5 IAB News ........................................................................................................................................................................... -
New Insights Into the Phylogeny and Relationships Within the Worldwide Genus Riccardia (Aneuraceae, Marchantiophytina)
European Journal of Taxonomy 273: 1–26 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.273 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Rabeau L. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. DNA Library of Life, research article New insights into the phylogeny and relationships within the worldwide genus Riccardia (Aneuraceae, Marchantiophytina) Lucile RABEAU 1,*, S. Robbert GRADSTEIN 2, Jean-Yves DUBUISSON 3, Martin NEBEL 4, Dietmar QUANDT 5 & Catherine REEB 6 1,2,3,6 Université Pierre et Marie Curie – Sorbonne Universités – Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB, UMR 7205, CNRS-MNHN-UPMC-EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 39, 75005 Paris, France. 4 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany. 5 Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 4 Email: [email protected] 5 Email: [email protected] 6 Email: [email protected] Abstract. With 280 accepted species, the genus Riccardia S.F.Gray (Aneuraceae) is one of the most speciose genera of simple thalloid liverworts. The current classification of this genus is based on morphological and limited-sampling molecular studies. Very few molecular data are available and a comprehensive view of evolutionary relationships within the genus is still lacking. A phylogeny focusing on relationships within the large genus Riccardia has not been conducted. Here we propose the first worldwide molecular phylogeny of the genus Riccardia, based on Bayesian inference and parsimony ratchet analyses of sequences from three plastid regions (psbA-trnH, rps4, trnL-F). -
Chapter 4 Aquaria
Glime, J. M. 2017. Aquaria. Chapt. 4. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 5. Uses. Ebook sponsored by Michigan 4-1 Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 1 September 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4 AQUARIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Aquarium Bryophytes ............................................................................................................................................ 4-2 Preparing a Moss Wall......................................................................................................................................... 4-11 Maintenance......................................................................................................................................................... 4-12 Dangers from Other Organisms.................................................................................................................... 4-12 Algae Problems............................................................................................................................................. 4-13 Commercial Fisheries........................................................................................................................................... 4-14 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-15 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................................... -
Liste Plantes
LISTE PLANTES Pour tout devis n'hésitez pas à nous demander sur Facebook : Aquarez.fr ou par email : [email protected] Les plantes sont garantits sans nuisible ni algues! Les envois de plante se font les lundis et mardis! Reçus au plus tard le vendredi. Frais de port à 15,5€ à partir de 30€ d'achat! Code : PLANTE30 Plantation au premier plan Anubias nana Bonsai 5.95 Anubias nana sp. De l'or 5.75 Bacopa sp. Japon 4.95 Bolbitis heteroclita difformis 7.95 Cladophora aegagropila / Mosbal Nano 1-3cm (2 pièces) 5.50 Cladophora aegagropila / Mosbal (1 pièce) 3.75 Crassula helmsii 4.50 Cryptocoryne costata 4.60 Cryptocoryne parva 4.60 Echinodorus latifolius 5,25 Echinodorus magdalenensis 5,25 Eleocharis acicularis / herbe à aiguilles 4.45 Eleocharis acicularis / tapis à gazon aiguille 15x11cm 7.95 Eleocharis parvula (herbe à aiguilles pygmée) 4.35 Fissidens fontanus 4.75 Glossostigma elatinoides 4.30 Helanthium tenellum (Echinodorus tenellus) 5.20 Hemianthus callitrichoides 4.30 Hottonia inflata 4.20 Hydrocotyle tripartita (sp. Japon)4.75 Lagenandra thwaitesii 4.55 Lilaeopsis carolinensis 4,25 Lilaeopsis novaezelandiae 4.20 Lilaeopsis novaezelandiae mat 15x11cm 7.95 Lilaeopsis mauritiana 4.20 Limnophila sp. Vietnam mini 4.95 Littorella uniflora 4,25 Lobelia cardinalis 4,25 Lobelia cardinalis Mini 4,25 Lobelia cardinalis Wavy 4.45 Marsilea spec. 4,25 Coupe Marsilea hirsuta-In Vitro 6.75 Micranthenum micranthemoides 4.30 Micranthemum sp. Monte Carlo 4.45 Micranthemum umbrosum 4.30 Micranthemum sp. Tapis Monte Carlo 15x11cm 7.95 Microsorum pteropus