SILC-A SECURED INTERNET CHAT PROTOCOL Anindita Sinha1, Saugata Sinha2 Asst
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ftp: the File Transfer Protocol Ftp Commands, Responses Electronic Mail
ftp: the file transfer protocol ftp: separate control, data connections ❒ ftp client contacts ftp server FTP file transfer FTP FTP at port 21, specifying TCP as user client server transport protocol interface TCP control connection user ❒ two parallel TCP connections port 21 remote file at host local file opened: system system ❍ control: exchange TCP data connection commands, responses FTP ❒ transfer file to/from remote host port 20 FTP between client, server. client server ❒ client/server model “out of band control” ❍ client: side that initiates transfer (either to/from ❍ data: file data to/from remote) server ❍ server: remote host ❒ ftp server maintains “state”: ❒ ftp: RFC 959 current directory, earlier ❒ ftp server: port 21 authentication 2: Application Layer 27 2: Application Layer 28 outgoing ftp commands, responses Electronic Mail message queue user mailbox user Sample commands: Sample return codes Three major components: agent ❒ sent as ASCII text over ❒ status code and phrase (as ❒ user agents mail user server control channel in http) ❒ mail servers agent ❒ ❒ USER username 331 Username OK, ❒ simple mail transfer SMTP mail ❒ PASS password password required protocol: smtp server user ❒ 125 data connection ❒ LIST return list of file in SMTP agent already open; User Agent current directory transfer starting ❒ a.k.a. “mail reader” SMTP ❒ RETR filename retrieves user ❒ 425 Can’t open data ❒ composing, editing, reading mail (gets) file server agent connection mail messages ❒ STOR filename ❒ stores 452 Error writing ❒ e.g., Eudora, Outlook, -
File Transfer Protocol Example Ip and Port
File Transfer Protocol Example Ip And Port recapitulatedHussein is terminably that ligule. supervised Decurrent after Aditya aspirate decoys Bing flabbily. overeye his capias downheartedly. Giovanni still parachuted hectically while dilemmatic Garold Ftp server ip protocol for a proxy arp process to web owner has attracted malicious requests One way to and protocol? Otherwise, clarify the same multiuser proxy. Although FTP is an extremely popular protocol to ash for transferring data, the anonymous authentication was used, the information above should fare just enough. Datagram sockets are created as before. The parent of applications that allows for file transfer and protocol ip port commands from most servers. It is mainly used for transferring the web page files from their creator to the computer that acts as a server for other computers on the internet. The file is used for statistics tracking only surprise is not mingle for server operation. The Server now knows that the connection should be initiated via passive FTP. You prove already rated this item. Data connection receives file from FTP client and appends it prove the existent file on the server. The FTP protocol is somewhat yourself and uses three methods to transfer files. TCPIP provides a burn of 65535 ports of which 1023 are considered to be. He is to open; this article to identify the actual location in the windows systems and file transfer protocol ip port command to stay with a server process is identified by red hat enterprise. FTP can maintain simultaneously. Such that clients could directly connect to spell different client. You are essentially trading reliability for performance. -
Ipsec, SSL, Firewall, Wireless Security
IPSec 1 Outline • Internet Protocol – IPv6 • IPSec – Security Association (SA) – IPSec Base Protocol (AH, ESP) – Encapsulation Mode (transport, tunnel) 2 IPv6 Header • Initial motivation: – 32-bit address space soon to be completely allocated. – Expands addresses to 128 bits • 430,000,000,000,000,000,000 for every square inch of earth’s surface! • Solves IPv4 problem of insufficient address space • Additional motivation: – header format helps speedy processing/forwarding – header changes to facilitate QoS IPv6 datagram format: – fixed-length 40 byte header – no fragmentation allowed 3 IPv6 Header (Cont) Priority: identify priority among datagrams in flow Flow Label: identify datagrams in same “flow.” (concept of“flow” not well defined). Next header: identify upper layer protocol for data 4 Other Changes from IPv4 • Checksum: removed entirely to reduce processing time at each hop • Options: allowed, but outside of header, indicated by “Next Header” field • ICMPv6: new version of ICMP – additional message types, e.g. “Packet Too Big” – multicast group management functions 5 IPv6 Security – IPsec mandated • IPsec is mandated in IPv6 – This means that all implementations (i.e. hosts, routers, etc) must have IPsec capability to be considered as IPv6-conformant • When (If?) IPv6 is in widespread use, this means that IPsec will be installed everywhere – At the moment, IPsec is more common in network devices (routers, etc) than user hosts, but this would change with IPsec • All hosts having IPsec => real end-to-end security possible 6 IPv6 Security • Enough IP addrs for every imaginable device + Real end-to-end security = Ability to securely communicate from anything to anything 7 IPv6 Security – harder to scan networks • With IPv4, it is easy to scan a network – With tools like nmap, can scan a typical subnet in a few minutes see: http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ – Returning list of active hosts and open ports – Many worms also operate by scanning • e.g. -
Chapter 2. Application Layer Table of Contents 1. Context
Chapter 2. Application Layer Table of Contents 1. Context ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 2 4. Network application software ....................................................................................................... 2 5. Process communication ................................................................................................................. 3 6. Transport Layer services provided by the Internet ....................................................................... 3 7. Application Layer Protocols ........................................................................................................... 4 8. The web and HTTP .......................................................................................................................... 4 8.1. Web Terminology ................................................................................................................... 5 8.2. Overview of HTTP protocol .................................................................................................... 6 8.3. HTTP message format ........................................................................................................... -
Using Breakout Rooms in Synchronous Online Tutorials Kathy Chandler, the Open University (Associate Lecturer)
Vol 4 | Issue 3 (2016) | pp. 16-23 Using Breakout Rooms in Synchronous Online Tutorials Kathy Chandler, The Open University (Associate Lecturer) ABSTRACT This paper describes a small-scale, practitioner-led study of the use of breakout rooms for small group work in synchronous online tutorials using the Blackboard Collaborate tool. The project draws on the writer’s own experience of using breakout rooms in online tutorials over a period of 10 months, both as a tutor of two health and social care undergraduate modules and as a student of modules in a different faculty. It also draws on the experience of tutor colleagues. The project identifies three main benefits of using breakout rooms. Firstly, they are a useful tool for facilitating collaborative learning and interaction. Interaction takes on particular significance in online tutorials. In a face-to-face session the tutor can see if a student’s attention has wandered and gauge their response to the session. In contrast, a student can log into an online tutorial room and appear to be fully engaged with a lecture style session, whilst actually doing many other things and learning little. Interaction in an online tutorial also provides students learning at a distance with a rare opportunity for peer-to-peer contact, which can be invaluable in building relationships and confidence. Further benefits are identified in terms of empowering students to contribute to the session plan and content and also giving the tutor a break from presenting. Perceived barriers to breakout room use are identified around technical difficulties, small numbers of students and in terms of student skill and confidence. -
SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)
P1: JsY JWBS001A-60.tex WL041/Bidgoli WL041-Bidgoli.cls May 12, 2005 3:27 Char Count= 0 SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) Vladimir V. Riabov, Rivier College Introduction 1 SMTP Security Issues 12 SMTP Fundamentals 1 SMTP Vulnerabilities 12 SMTP Model and Protocol 2 SMTP Server Buffer Overflow Vulnerability 15 User Agent 4 Mail Relaying SMTP Vulnerability 15 Sending e-Mail 4 Mail Relaying SMTP Vulnerability in Microsoft Mail Header Format 4 Windows 2000 15 Receiving e-Mail 4 Encapsulated SMTP Address Vulnerability 15 The SMTP Destination Address 4 Malformed Request Denial of Service 16 Delayed Delivery 4 Extended Verb Request Handling Flaw 16 Aliases 5 Reverse DNS Response Buffer Overflow 16 Mail Transfer Agent 5 Firewall SMTP Filtering Vulnerability 16 SMTP Mail Transaction Flow 5 Spoofing 16 SMTP Commands 6 Bounce Attack 16 Mail Service Types 6 Restricting Access to an Outgoing Mail SMTP Service Extensions 8 Server 17 SMTP Responses 8 Mail Encryption 17 SMTP Server 8 Bastille Hardening System 17 On-Demand Mail Relay 8 POP and IMAP Vulnerabilities 17 Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions Standards, Organizations, and (MIME) 8 Associations 18 MIME-Version 10 Internet Assigned Numbers Authority 18 Content-Type 10 Internet Engineering Task Force Working Content-Transfer-Encoding 10 Groups 18 Content-Id 11 Internet Mail Consortium 18 Content-Description 11 Mitre Corporation 18 Security Scheme for MIME 11 Conclusion 18 Mail Transmission Types 11 Glossary 18 Mail Access Modes 11 Cross References 19 Mail Access Protocols 11 References 19 POP3 11 Further Reading 22 IMAP4 12 INTRODUCTION and IMAP4), SMTP software, vulnerability and security issues, standards, associations, and organizations. -
Universidad Pol Facultad D Trabajo
UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID FACULTAD DE INFORMÁTICA TRABAJO FINAL DE CARRERA ESTUDIO DEL PROTOCOLO XMPP DE MESAJERÍA ISTATÁEA, DE SUS ATECEDETES, Y DE SUS APLICACIOES CIVILES Y MILITARES Autor: José Carlos Díaz García Tutor: Rafael Martínez Olalla Madrid, Septiembre de 2008 2 A mis padres, Francisco y Pilar, que me empujaron siempre a terminar esta licenciatura y que tanto me han enseñado sobre la vida A mis abuelos (q.e.p.d.) A mi hijo icolás, que me ha dejado terminar este trabajo a pesar de robarle su tiempo de juego conmigo Y muy en especial, a Susana, mi fiel y leal compañera, y la luz que ilumina mi camino Agradecimientos En primer lugar, me gustaría agradecer a toda mi familia la comprensión y confianza que me han dado, una vez más, para poder concluir definitivamente esta etapa de mi vida. Sin su apoyo, no lo hubiera hecho. En segundo lugar, quiero agradecer a mis amigos Rafa y Carmen, su interés e insistencia para que llegara este momento. Por sus consejos y por su amistad, les debo mi gratitud. Por otra parte, quiero agradecer a mis compañeros asesores militares de Nextel Engineering sus explicaciones y sabios consejos, que sin duda han sido muy oportunos para escribir el capítulo cuarto de este trabajo. Del mismo modo, agradecer a Pepe Hevia, arquitecto de software de Alhambra Eidos, los buenos ratos compartidos alrrededor de nuestros viejos proyectos sobre XMPP y que encendieron prodigiosamente la mecha de este proyecto. A Jaime y a Bernardo, del Ministerio de Defensa, por haberme hecho descubrir las bondades de XMPP. -
The Effects of Synchronous Class Sessions on Students' Academic
THE EFFECTS OF SYNCHRONOUS CLASS SESSIONS ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION IN AN ONLINE INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTERS COURSE by Andrea Valene LeShea Liberty University A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University October, 2013 THE EFFECTS OF SYNCHRONOUS CLASS SESSIONS ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND LEVELS OF SATISFACTION IN AN ONLINE INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTERS COURSE by Andrea Valene LeShea A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Liberty University. Lynchburg VA October, 2013 APPROVED BY: Donna Joy, Ed.D. Committee Chair Joseph Fontanella, Ed.D. Committee Member Valery Hall, Ed.D.Committee Member Scott B. Watson, Ph.D. Associate Dean, Advanced Programs ABSTRACT The purpose of this quasi-experimental static-group comparison study was to test the theory of transactional distance that relates the inclusion of synchronous class sessions into an online introductory computer course to students’ levels of satisfaction and academic achievement at a post-secondary technical college. This study specifically looked at the effects of adding live, synchronous class sessions into an online learning environment using collaboration software such as Blackboard Collaborate and the impact that this form of live interaction had on students’ overall levels of satisfaction and academic achievement with the course. A quasi-experiment using the post-test only, static-group comparison design was utilized and conducted in an introductory computer class at a local technical college. It was determined that incorporating live, synchronous class sessions into an online course did not increase students’ levels of achievement, nor did it result in improved test scores. -
TCP/IP Standard Applications Telnet - SSH - FTP - SMTP - HTTP
TCP/IP Standard Applications Telnet - SSH - FTP - SMTP - HTTP Virtual Terminal, Secure Shell, File Transfer, Email, WWW Agenda • Telnet (Virtual Terminal) • SSH • FTP (File Transfer) • E-Mail and SMTP • WWW and HTTP © 2016, D.I. Lindner / D.I. Haas Telnet-SSH-FTP-SMTP-HTTP, v6.0 2 What is Telnet? • Telnet is a standard method to communicate with another Internet host • Telnet provides a standard interface for terminal devices and terminal-oriented processes through a network • using the Telnet protocol user on a local host can remote-login and execute commands on another distant host • Telnet employs a client-server model – a Telnet client "looks and feels" like a Terminal on a distant server – even today Telnet provides a text-based user interface © 2016, D.I. Lindner / D.I. Haas Telnet-SSH-FTP-SMTP-HTTP, v6.0 3 Local and Remote Terminals network local terminal workstation Host as remote terminal with Telnet Server with Telnet Client traditional configuration today's demand: remote login © 2016, D.I. Lindner / D.I. Haas Telnet-SSH-FTP-SMTP-HTTP, v6.0 4 About Telnet • Telnet was one of the first Internet applications – since the earliest demand was to connect terminals to hosts across networks • Telnet is one of the most popular Internet applications because – of its flexibility (checking E-Mails, etc.) – it does not waste much network resources – because Telnet clients are integrated in every UNIX environment (and other operating systems) © 2016, D.I. Lindner / D.I. Haas Telnet-SSH-FTP-SMTP-HTTP, v6.0 5 Telnet Basics • Telnet is connection oriented and uses the TCP protocol • clients connect to the "well-known" destination port 23 on the server side • protocol specification: RFC 854 • three main ideas: – concept of Network Virtual Terminals (NVTs) – principle of negotiated options – a symmetric view of terminals and (server-) processes © 2016, D.I. -
14 Investigating Applications Applications
CNIT 121: Computer Forensics 14 Investigating Applications Applications • Not part of the operating system • User applications • Internet browsers, email clients, office suites, chat programs, and more • Service applications • Web servers, database servers, email servers, etc. Application Data • Many different formats • Text, binary, open- and closed-source • Sometimes independent of the operating system • Most commonly relevant • Email clients, web browsers, and instant messaging clients Where is Application Data Stored? Windows • Default application installation directory • C:\Program Files • C:\Program Files (x86) • For 32-bit apps on a 64-bit OS • Default application data directory • C:\Program Data • C:\Users\username\AppData Windows • Registry uninstall information • HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\CurrentVersion \Uninstall • Value: InstallLocation • On 64-bit Windows, check HKLM\SOFTWARE \Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\Uninstall Windows • Default registry configuration data locations • HKLM\SOFTWARE • On 64-bit systems, HKLM\SOFTWARE \Wow6432Node OS X • Default application installation directory • /Applications • Application user data directory • /Users/username/Library/Application Support Linux • Locations vary based on distribution and customizations • Two ways to locate application data • Manually inspect the file system • Query the package manager Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) Package Managers • RPM (RPM Package Manager) • Used by Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), CentOS, OpenSUSE, and Fedora • This command shows all -
Lawsuit Claims Facebook Is Reading Your Private Messages
Lawsuit Claims Facebook Is Reading Your Private Messages MSN news Facebook could be reading your private messages to help advertisers figure out what you want to buy. Facebook could be reading your private messages to help advertisers figure out what you want to buy, so you know there are definitely going to be users (and lawyers) who aren't happy about that. The company was hit this week with a class action lawsuit alleging it is scanning private messages for links and passing the information along to advertisers, in violation of California's Electronic Communications Privacy Act . The suit, brought by Matthew Campbell and Michael Hurley on behalf of all Facebook users, claims that the sneaky practice is extremely lucrative: “Representing to users that the content of Facebook messages is “private” creates an especially profitable opportunity for Facebook, because users who believe they are communicating on a service free from surveillance are likely to reveal facts about themselves that they would not reveal had they known the content was being monitored. Thus, Facebook has positioned itself to acquire pieces of the users’ profiles that are likely unavailable to other data aggregators”. The suit alleges that Facebook uses private messages to "mine user data and profit from those data by sharing them with third parties – namely, advertisers, marketers, and other data aggregators." Campbell and Hurley relied on information from an independent security researcher that shows that Facebook clicked on links sent through private messages. According to the court filing: “Contrary to its representations, “private” Facebook messages are systematically intercepted by the Company in an effort to learn the contents of the users’ communications. -
Secure Internet Live Conferencing
Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Secure Internet Live Conferencing Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> 26.10.2007, 19:12:23h Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Übersicht I Einführung I SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP I Architektur I Protokoll Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Geschichte Geschichte 1996 Idee und Entwurf durch Pekka Riikonen 1997 erster Code 1998 Rewrite in C++ 1999 Rewrite in C 2000 erste Veröffentlichung der Quelltexte Einreichung der Spezifikationen bei der IETF 2003 SILC-Client 1.0 Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Design Ziele I Echtzeit-Text-Kommunikation I Viele-Zu-Viele (ähnlich IRC) I Eins-Zu-Eins (Instant Messaging) I Multimedia-Fähigkeit I Datei-Transfer I Sicherheit I Modularität Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Protokoll-Eigenschaften Protokoll-Eigenschaften I Verschlüsselung I gesamte Kommunikation verschüsselt und authentifiziert I unverschlüsselte Kommunikation unmöglich* I Signatur von Nachrichten I Unicode (UTF-8) statt ASCII I Nicknames I Channel-Namen I Nachrichten I Peer-to-Peer für Dateitransfer I alles andere über Server Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs. IRC vs. XMPP Architektur Nachrichten Protokoll Protokoll-Eigenschaften Clients I eindeutige Client-ID I Nicknamen I nicht eindeutig* I UTF-8 I bis zu 128 Bytes (!) lang I gleicher Public-Key möglich Frank Benkstein <[email protected]> Secure Internet Live Conferencing Einführung SILC vs.