A ten-year retrospective study of cervical conization followed by hysterectomy for various grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
CLAYTON T. SHAW, D 0 Omaha, Nebraska HEINZ 0. OSTERHOLZER, m D Philadelphia, Pennsylvania DAVID M. EVANS, m D Wiesbaden, West Germany
They are: (1) visualization of the entire lesion; (2) A ten-year retrospective study of expertise in colposcopy; (3) exclusion of invasive seventy-seven patients from January carcinoma by punch biopsy; (4) adequate cytologic 1971 to December 1980, at the Tripler and colposcopic follow-up; and (5) endocervical Army Medical Center, who curettage. underwent cold knife conization for Conization as a modality, however, is considered cervical intraepithelial neoplasia a definitive therapy for the removal of dysplastic (CIN) followed by hysterectomy, was tissue and is required if the colposcopic examina- performed to determine the tion is inadequate or the endocervical curettage is predictive value of cone clearance positive for CIN. Kolstad stated that conization is regarding residual CIN. Forty-four of the method of choice for carcinoma in situ. He the seventy-seven patients had found a 97 percent cure rate with 1 percent pro- clear cone margins but seven of these gressing to invasive carcinoma and 2 percent to re- forty-four had residual CIN at the current carcinoma in situ. Caglar 9 also studied the time of hysterectomy. This accuracy of the cervical cone. He performed coniza- represented a 15.9 percent tion in thirty-three patients and immediately fol- recurrence rate. Thirty-three patients lowed that procedure with a vaginal hysterectomy. had margins involved at the time of He found that in three patients (9 percent) of the conization, but only fourteen of these uteri specimens had the same diagnosis as the con- (42.4 percent) demonstrated residual ization. Jones" reported recurrence rates of 3.8 to CIN on hysterectomy specimen. 9.4 percent from a number of studies between 1970 Twenty-eight of the seventy-seven and 1976. An earlier report from Tripler Army were noted to have at least one Medical Center also demonstrated a similar cure concurrent gynecologic condition. rate." Ostergard," however, recently found that The efficacy of cold knife conization 16 percent of patients with clear cone margins and as a "cure" for CIN as generally 34 percent with involved margins had residual stated in the literature is not CIN. He concluded that a prediction cannot be supported by this paper. made as to recurrence based on cleared margin and that a failure rate is closer to 16 percent in skilled hands. The question then arises—Is coniza- tion as a definitive therapy really as good as ori- ginally perceived? The purpose of this study was to determine the Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is of ma- predictive value of cone clearance regarding resid- jor concern to the gynecologist because of its pre- ual CIN. It was the authors desire to determine cancerous nature. Since this disease is a contin- the following: (1) the cone pathology; (2) the num- uum and may well lead to invasive cancer, it is the ber of cone slides; (3) the cone margins; (4) hyster- obligation of the gynecologist to diagnose, treat, ectomy pathology for residual CIN; (5) the number and closely follow patients with CIN. Whether a of hysterectomy slides; and (6) concurrent gyneco- gynecologist utilizes cryosurgery, carbon dioxide logic pathology at the time of hysterectomy. laser therapy, or electrocoagulation diathermy, he can expect a cure rate of from 88 to 95 percent," Materials and methods provided that he follows the pretreatment evalua- A retrospective study of seventy-seven patients tion standards set down by Jordan and Chanen.7 who underwent conization for CIN from January