DOCSLIB.ORG

HARRIS COUNTY MARRIAGES Groom's Surname Groom's First Name Bride's Surname Bride's First Name Date Page Book Adair William E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HARRIS COUNTY MARRIAGES Groom's Surname Groom's First Name Bride's Surname Bride's First Name Date Page Book Adair William E HARRIS COUNTY MARRIAGES Groom's Surname Groom's First Name Bride's Surname Bride's First Name Date Page Book Adair William E. White Mary C. 16 August 1851 45 A Adams Green W. Bentley Mary S. 8 June 1830 2 A Adams Wilson Peal Peel 10 December ? 5 A Adams Wilson Peel Parena 18 December 1832 7 A Adams William Hagin Nancy T. 6 August 1846 34 A Adams Samuel Jones Bathena 28 February 1849 41 A Adams Martin Berry Mary M. 1 February 1854 51 A Adams Reuben Mullins Julia 20 August 1847 36 A Akers John W. Dozier Ann E. 1 November 1858 60 A Alexander Robert H. Slatings Mary P. 23 November 1847 37 A Alexander Charles S. Bowles Emliza 25 December 1852 48 A Alexander Huguley Matthews Mary 8 December 1856 56 A Alford Thomas J. Adams Mary 4 February 1850 43 A Allen James M. Harper Clementine 3 April 1843 27 A Allen Richard Yarbrough Frances 12 October 1844 30 A Allen Richard B. Roberson Sarah 10 July 1847 36 A Allen George W. Rhoden Elizabeth 15 May 1856 55 A Allen George W. Welden Sarah Jane 7 August 1856 55 A Allford William Philips Clarisse 10 December 1833 9 A Allgood John M. Downs Alsey 25 October 1843 28 A Alman William J. Fuller Martha C. 17 June 1848 39 A Almand Jesse L. Hightower Emily B. 21 October 1848 40 A Almaud Simeon Blackmon Rachael 25 November 1850 44 A Almond Isaac Shannon Sarah 8 September 1850 42 A Almond Isaac Shannon Sarah 8 September 1850 44 A Ammons Henry D. Davis Eliza 30 September 1843 28 A Anderson L. P. Heard Josephine H. 29 December 1851 46 A Anderson Adolphus Smith Catharine E. 13 December 1855 54 A Anderson A. G. Smith Eliza 24 December 1855 54 A Anderson Gilbert M. Bachelor Mary 27 September 1856 55 A Anderson David M. Butts Martha 20 October 1857 58 A Andrew William A. M. Bass Sarah 14 January 1836 11 A Andrews John G. Hood Louisa A. 20 December 1847 37 A Andrews William A. Cotton Sarah F. 21 October 1854 52 A Antoney Richard J. Duke Jane 21 January 1833 8 A Archer William M. Davis Amanda M. 3 July 1848 39 A Arledge Imamuel L. Harding Nancy 14 September 1841 23 A Armor Richard W. Brown Adeline 16 July 1829 2 A Armstrong Golden Blow Matilda 14 August 1847 36 A Arrant David Huggins Elizabeth 1 January 1836 11 A Arrant James Burrough Adaline 11 September 1841 23 A Askew John M. West Sarah A. 6 August 1839 17 A Askew David Alberson Nancy 13 July 1841 22 A Askew Andrew J. Copeland Mary 25 January 1842 25 A Askew David N. Cox Levisa 29 July 1844 30 A Askew David N. Morris Polly 29 September 1852 48 A Atha Thomas E. McCarter Elizaeth H. 11 January 1854 51 A Aughtry Druarty A. Tarvin Clarissa 13 July 1852 47 A Austin William Austin Eliza 14 March 1849 41 A Autry Rayford Thomaston Mary F. 3 January 1853 49 A Autry Andrew G. Phillips Nancy Ann ?? Janaury 1858 59 A Avant John A. Buckhalter Joicy 20 November 1851 46 A Babb Mercer McGee Concord 29 December 1842 26 A Bachelor George Blue Mary 29 August 1844 30 A Baggerly Ephraim W. Trammel Emeline E. 18 July 1842 25 A Baggs John Woods E. P. 14 September 1858 59 A Baird William P. Cox Mary 2 November 1840 20 A Baker Offord Williams Celia Mae 30 September 1854 52 A Bankston Boswell L. Huey Martha J. December ? 1847 37 A Bankston Abner B. Thornton Emily F. 22 December 1853 50 A Barden Nathaniel H. Wright Nancy 3 April 1832 4 A Barden Nathaniel H. Pruett Louisa F. M. E. 26 May 1846 34 A Barmoore Larkin Hardin Mary ?? February 1845 31 A Barnes Nathaniel Langston Lorene 4 November 1844 30 A Barnes James F. Johnson Sarah B. 18 December 1845 33 A Barnes Augustus H. Robinson Julia T. 18 January 1848 39 A Barns Oscar Cox Mary 3 September 1839 18 A Barron John McvCuller Julia Ann 15 December 1845 33 A Barrown John Adkins Martha Ann 22 June 1844 29 A Bartee George Steadham Mary 21 January 1833 9 A Bartley Walker Wells Mary 12 November 1845 32 A Bartley James V. Stone Mary E. 3 December 1848 40 A Ondea Robert B. McGourk Nancy 16 June 1846 34 A Bass Noah Powell Martha 2 December 1833 9 A Bass Lundy Ricester Eleanor 5 December 1840 20 A Bass Gregory Cook Caroline A. 5 Janaury 1846 34 A Bass George W. Land Missouri 14 December 1853 50 A Bass Lemuel C. Nelson Mary Jane 22 November 1856 56 A Batchelor N. E. Grayham Mary M. 17 October 1845 32 A Batchelor William T. Smith Margaret 27 December 1845 33 A Bathea David Webb Jame Milaria 5 October 1857 57 A Battle Jesse M. Adams Jane 3 March 1833 9 A Bazemore Thomas W. J. Palmore Oma 27 February 1847 36 A Beal Adam J. Sanders Annie E. 22 April 1851 45 A Beall R. K. Booker Ann C. 9 January 1844 29 A Beall Augustus A. Murphy Ann Eliza 27 July 1857 57 A Bean Levi Williams Lubenia 30 January 1836 11 A Bean Marshall J. Hagood Ann 23 Janaury 1843 27 A Beardin Simeon W. Clark Martha S 26 December 1850 44 A Beasley William Robinson Sarah 2 January 1859 61 A Bechham Isaac A. Nunnlee Elizabeth 8 October 1836 12 A Beckham John S. Kirk Rebecca 2 December 1833 9 A Bedell George W. E. Brown Emblem 4 September 1831 3 A Bedell Thomas J. Green Caroline M 9 March 1832 4 A Bedell John Robertson Ann 22 January 1838 14 A Bedell John Robertson Sarah E. 22 January 1851 45 A Bedell Albert G. Bidell Eliza 28 September 1852 48 A Belcher David Abner Elvina 8 December 1848 40 A Belk Leonida Lambert Martha 17 May 1841 22 A Belt John Mobley M. B. 27 April 1852 47 A Benett Micajah Watson Elizabeth 27 January 1852 47 A Bennett Jacob S. Mays Sarah V. 8 May 1857 57 A Benning R. E. Simpson Francis A. 9 April 1844 29 A Bentan Nugeulus N. Davis Roxy Ann 10 February 1847 36 A Benton George C. Hood Nancy J. 10 November 1842 26 A Berry Felix J. Enans Sarah 19 November 1859 62 A Bias George W. Warren Lydia A. 29 July 1854 52 A Bibby John A. Welch Elizabeth 14 May 1847 36 A Bibby William R. Cathoun Nancy C. A. 9 July 1853 49 A Bidell William A. Switzer Sarah 4 December 1838 16 A Bigham John Boyd Sarah Jane 2 March 1833 9 A Bighie James N. Grant Louisa A. J. 27 May 1850 43 A Bilbo John Berriman Rutlidge Ann L. 21 November 1837 14 A Billingslea Winston Johnson Malinda 12 January 1843 27 A Binns Joseph D. Cox Narcissa M. 5 July 1859 62 A Bird George W. McKee Nancy J. 20 May 1849 41 A Bird John Hollis Rutha 2 February 1852 47 A Bishop William Williams Ellen 25 April 1848 39 A Black William T. Miller Sarah Ann Woodson 4 January 1855 53 A Blackman James Farmer Rebecca no entry 1 A Blackman William Blackman Sibby 28 December 1828 2 A Blackman William Blackman Martha no entry 2 A Blackman Nathan Blackman Ginsey no entry 3 A Blackman Perry Laney Rachael 5 February 1841 22 A Blackman Joshua Layfield Clementine 1 July 1848 39 A Blackman Minor Shenn Elizabeth 27 April 1850 43 A Blackman James S. Massey Mary 25 December 1851 46 A Blackmon Simeon Farmer Margarett 4 June 1833 8 A Blackmon John C. Maddox Acharle G. 14 June 1836 12 A Blackmon James W. Blackmon Eda 19 October 1839 18 A Blackmon Jesse G. Graves Susan 18 May 1840 19 A Blackmon Burrel R. Roberts Elizabeth 27 December 1842 26 A Blackmon James W. Blackmon Elizabeth J. 14 November 1843 28 A Blackmon Chapman Sheen Sussannah 20 April 1844 29 A Blackmon Hollis Bazmore Susan T. 27 August 1846 34 A Blackmon Andy Johnson Mary 8 October 1853 50 A Blackmon Chapman Funderburg Eleanor 3 November 1854 52 A Blackmon M. C. Orr Catharine 22 January 1855 53 A Blackmon John R. Rowell Sarah 28 October 1855 54 A Blackmon David R. Johnson Martha A. 20 December 1855 54 A Blackmon Franklin F. Hudspeth Sarah C. 24 November 1856 56 A Blackmon Jonathan Blackmon Martha Ann 28 February 1858 59 A Blackmon Jefferson Layfield Nancy 30 November 1859 63 A Blake William Minyard Elizabeth 18 March 1843 27 A Blantan Wyatt Cameran Floy Ann 21 October 1845 32 A Blow John Brashaw Caroline 21 December 1844 30 A Bodie Bennet Whitehead Elizabeth 3 May 1841 22 A Booker George R. Rivers Ann E. 3 March 1859 61 A Borders William B. Alexander Martha 7 August 1837 13 A Borders William M. Alexander Martha 4 January 1841 22 A Borders Augustine L. Osborn Cornelia C. 4 August 1845 32 A Borders James E. Roberts Jane 23 October 1845 32 A Boring George W. Stewart Mary Jane 11 October 1851 45 A Bowdain Martin A. Faulkner Sarah W. 9 August 1845 32 A Bowles Thomas Blackman Lucene J. 26 August 1850 43 A Bowles John F. Roberts Zelley 15 November 1850 44 A Bowls Richard M. Stalings Rebecca 4 November 1847 37 A Bowls Cornelia J. Roberts Sarah 7 November 1848 40 A Boyd John H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
    Chapter 6 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Jim Taylor, Dennis K. Lee, and Shervin Shambayati 6.1 Mission Overview The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) [1, 2] has a suite of instruments making observations at Mars, and it provides data-relay services for Mars landers and rovers. MRO was launched on August 12, 2005. The orbiter successfully went into orbit around Mars on March 10, 2006 and began reducing its orbit altitude and circularizing the orbit in preparation for the science mission. The orbit changing was accomplished through a process called aerobraking, in preparation for the “science mission” starting in November 2006, followed by the “relay mission” starting in November 2008. MRO participated in the Mars Science Laboratory touchdown and surface mission that began in August 2012 (Chapter 7). MRO communications has operated in three different frequency bands: 1) Most telecom in both directions has been with the Deep Space Network (DSN) at X-band (~8 GHz), and this band will continue to provide operational commanding, telemetry transmission, and radiometric tracking. 2) During cruise, the functional characteristics of a separate Ka-band (~32 GHz) downlink system were verified in preparation for an operational demonstration during orbit operations. After a Ka-band hardware anomaly in cruise, the project has elected not to initiate the originally planned operational demonstration (with yet-to-be­ used redundant Ka-band hardware). 201 202 Chapter 6 3) A new-generation ultra-high frequency (UHF) (~400 MHz) system was verified with the Mars Exploration Rovers in preparation for the successful relay communications with the Phoenix lander in 2008 and the later Mars Science Laboratory relay operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnc 2021 Abstract Book
    GNC 2021 ABSTRACT BOOK Contents GNC Posters ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Poster 01: A Software Defined Radio Galileo and GPS SW receiver for real-time on-board Navigation for space missions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Poster 02: JUICE Navigation camera design .................................................................................................... 9 Poster 03: PRESENTATION AND PERFORMANCES OF MULTI-CONSTELLATION GNSS ORBITAL NAVIGATION LIBRARY BOLERO ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Poster 05: EROSS Project - GNC architecture design for autonomous robotic On-Orbit Servicing .............. 12 Poster 06: Performance assessment of a multispectral sensor for relative navigation ............................... 14 Poster 07: Validation of Astrix 1090A IMU for interplanetary and landing missions ................................... 16 Poster 08: High Performance Control System Architecture with an Output Regulation Theory-based Controller and Two-Stage Optimal Observer for the Fine Pointing of Large Scientific Satellites ................. 18 Poster 09: Development of High-Precision GPSR Applicable to GEO and GTO-to-GEO Transfer ................. 20 Poster 10: P4COM: ESA Pointing Error Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Lives of American Missionary Women in China (1860-1920)
    CONVERT BUT NOT CONVERTED: THE WESTERN LIVES OF AMERICAN MISSIONARY WOMEN IN CHINA (1860-1920) A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Caroline Hearn Fuchs, M.I.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. March 31, 2014 CONVERT BUT NOT CONVERTED: THE WESTERN LIVES OF AMERICAN MISSIONARY WOMEN IN CHINA (1860-1920) Caroline Hearn Fuchs, M.I.A. MALS Mentor: Kazuko Uchimura, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Kate Roberts Hearn was buried in a Shanghai cemetery in 1891, a short four years after her acceptance into the Women’s Missionary Service of the Methodist Episcopal Church, South. In 1873, Charlotte “Lottie” Moon left for a new life in China as a single missionary woman. She served in that country for nearly 40 years, dying aboard ship on a final return voyage to the United States. Both women left their American homes expecting to convert the people of an alien land to Christianity. They also arrived in China prepared to maintain their Western rituals and comforts, which effectively separated them from the Chinese and cultivated a sense of the “Other.” In this way, missionary women came to convert, but were not converted themselves. Missionary communities, specifically missionary women, vigorously sought to maintain domestic and work lifestyles anchored in Western culture. The rise of “domesticity” in the nineteenth century gave women an influential role as a graceful redeemer, able to transform “heathens” by demonstrating civilized values of a Christian home, complete with Western elements of cleanliness, companionable marriage, and the paraphernalia of Victorian life, such as pianos in the parlor.
    [Show full text]
  • Infusion of XTCE to NASA Missions
    MULTIMISSION GROUND SYSTEM & SERVICES OFFICE, INTERPLANETARY NETWORK DIRECTORATE Will XTCE work for your organization? It will for us! Infusion of XTCE to NASA missions Michela Muñoz Fernández1, George Rinker1, Marti DeMore1 Dan Smith2, Ron Jones3, Kevin Rice3 1NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 3ASRC March 4, 2015 © 2015 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Published by The Aerospace Corporation with permission. March 2015 GSAW 2015 1 MULTIMISSION GROUND SYSTEM & SERVICES OFFICE, INTERPLANETARY NETWORK DIRECTORATE NASA’s XTCE effort • Like you, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory has investigated ways to share and interpret information across centers and agencies. • More consistency across products and with commercial software is required. • XML Telemetric & Command Exchange (XTCE) standard has been considered for telemetry and command information: • Needed: perform an examination of its applicability to the JPL Advanced Multi-Mission Operations System (AMMOS) to meet our needs • We have recently completed processes to allow us to assess the suitability of XTCE to support our missions. • Challenge -- To rapidly integrate and test command and telemetry metadata from one agency to another agency's satellite to reduce schedule and cost • Solution – We found we can use a common database exchange (XTCE) so integration and test is familiar and straightforward March 2015 GSAW 2015 2 MULTIMISSION GROUND SYSTEM & SERVICES OFFICE, INTERPLANETARY
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Meyer NASA Mars Exploration Program Lead Scientist
    Michael Meyer NASA Mars Exploration Program Lead Scientist Committee on the Review of Progress Toward Implementing the Decadal Survey Vision and Voyages for Planetary Sciences July 13, 2017 International Collaboration on Mars Missions To address the Committee on the Review of Progress Toward Implementing the Decadal Survey Vision and Voyages for Planetary Sciences task concerning the Mars Exploration Program: o the long-term goals of the Planetary Science Division’s Mars Exploration Program and the program’s ability to optimize the science return, given the current fiscal posture of the program; o the Mars exploration architecture’s relationship to Mars-related activities to be undertaken by foreign agencies and organizations; and • All operating Mars missions have involved some degree of cooperation, anywhere from navigation support, to participating scientists/co-investigators, to instrument contributions, to joint mission formulation and partnerships. • Working through the International Mars Exploration Working Group, communications standards have been well coordinated • For US missions, competed instruments have been open, whether foreign or domestic. 3 International Collaborations: US Operating missions • Odyssey – High Energy Neutron Detector, HEND • Opportunity – Alpha Particle X-ray Experiment, APXS, – Mössbauer Spectrometer • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter – Shallow Radar sounder, SHARAD – Shared investigators between CRISM and OMEGA – Landing sites for ExoMars EDM & ExoMars 2020 rover • Curiosity – Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer,
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Announces Mars 2020 Rover Payload to Explore the Red Planet As Never Before - 2020 Mission Plans
    mars.jpl.nasa.gov NASA Announces Mars 2020 Rover Payload to Explore the Red Planet as Never Before - 2020 Mission Plans 5 min read• original Payload for NASA's Mars 2020 Rover This diagram shows the science instruments for NASA's Mars 2020 rover mission. Credit: NASA Planning for NASA's 2020 Mars rover envisions a basic structure that capitalizes on the design and engineering work done for the NASA rover Curiosity, which landed on Mars in 2012, but with new science instruments selected through competition for accomplishing different science objectives. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech The next rover NASA will send to Mars in 2020 will carry seven carefully-selected instruments to conduct unprecedented science and exploration technology investigations on the Red Planet. NASA announced the selected Mars 2020 rover instruments Thursday at the agency's headquarters in Washington. Managers made the selections out of 58 proposals received in January from researchers and engineers worldwide. Proposals received were twice the usual number submitted for instrument competitions in the recent past. This is an indicator of the extraordinary interest by the science community in the exploration of the Mars. The selected proposals have a total value of approximately $130 million for development of the instruments. The Mars 2020 mission will be based on the design of the highly successful Mars Science Laboratory rover, Curiosity, which landed almost two years ago, and currently is operating on Mars. The new rover will carry more sophisticated, upgraded hardware and new instruments to conduct geological assessments of the rover's landing site, determine the potential habitability of the environment, and directly search for signs of ancient Martian life.
    [Show full text]
  • Electra-Lite Mars Proximity Link Communications and Navigation Payload Description 04/06/2006
    Electra-Lite Mars Proximity Link Communications and Navigation Payload Description 04/06/2006 Electra Development Overview The Mars Exploration Program (MEP) has identified the need for establishing a robust Mars infrastructure to provide mission-enabling and enhancing telecommunications and navigation services to future MEP elements. To this end, the Program has funded development of a standardized proximity link communications and navigation payload, known as the Electra UHF Transceiver (EUT), for flight on each strategic orbiter, starting with the 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Electra will serve as the heart of a constellation of Mars network nodes efficiently relaying high rate in-situ mission science and engineering data, providing accurate navigation data and a precision timing reference for synchronizing spacecraft and in-situ assets that otherwise could not be achieved. Electra will be carried as a MEP-provided payload on future Mars science orbiters, starting with the 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), providing a low-cost approach towards developing a Mars orbital communications infrastructure. After completion of their primary science mission, these spacecraft will continue to operate in Mars orbit utilizing the capabilities of the Electra payload to provide proximity link services to other elements of the Mars Program Electra- compatible transceivers (frequency band, protocols, encoding schemes etc.) will be installed on future Mars surface assets including landers, rovers etc. to provide an in-situ data link with Mars orbiters. The overall concept illustrating the Electra Payload operation is shown in Figure 1. EARTH DSN 34M DSN 70M ELECTRA PAYLOAD ON-BOARD SCIENCE ORBITER PROBE ROVER MARS SCOUT Figure 1: Electra Payload Operation Concept Since the mass, volume and DC power specifications for the standard Electra EUT may be inappropriate for a Mars lander with stringent mass and energy constraints, a smaller lander UHF 1 radio is desired.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda (With Backup)
    COLUMBIA COUNTY BOAR[) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS POST OFFICE BOX 1529 LAKE CITY, FLORIDA 32056-1529 COLUMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX 372 WEST DUVAL STREET LAKE CITY, FLORIDA 32055 AGENDA NOVEMBER 3, 2011 3:00 P.M. ·Invocation {Commissioner Ronald Williams} Pledge to U.S. Flag Staff Agenda Additions/Deletions Adoption of Agenda Public Comments Jody DuPree, Chairman {1} Presentation of National Hospice and Palliative Care Month Proclamation Marlin Feagle, County Attorney PUBLIC HEARING: {1} Ordinance Relating to Boating Restricted Areas STAFF MATTERS: HONORABLE JODY DUPREE. CHAIRMAN (1) Consent Agenda DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: (1) Offer of Sale to Columbia County from Ellisville Investments, Inc. (2) Redistricting Proposals ** COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA PROCLAMATION 2011P-10 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE MONTH - NOVEMBER 2011 WHEREAS, hospice and palliative care offer the highest quality services and support to patients and family caregivers facing serious and life-limiting illness; WHEREAS, hospice care and palliative care providers take the time to ask what's important to those they are caring for - and listen to what their patients and families say; WHEREAS, skilled and compassionate hospice and palliative care professionals - including physicians, nurses, social workers, therapists, counselors, health aides, and clergy - provide comprehensive care focused on the wishes of each individual patient; WHEREAS, through pain management and symptom control, caregiver training
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing
    Spectroscopy Course in Fall 2009 ASEN 5519 Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing Xinzhao Chu University of Colorado at Boulder 1 Concept of Remote Sensing Remote Sensing is the science and technology of obtaining information about an object without having the sensor in direct physical contact with the object. -- opposite to in-situ methods Radiation interacting with an object to acquire its information remotely Active SODAR: Sound Detection And Ranging Remote RADAR: Radiowave Detection And Ranging Sensing LIDAR: Light Detection And Ranging DRI, Nevada Arecibo 2 Light Detection And Ranging LIDAR is a very promising remote sensing tool due to its high resolution and accuracy. In combination of modern laser spectroscopy methods, LIDAR can detect variety of species and key parameters, with wide applications. Cloud 3 Light Detection And Ranging 120 km 75 km 30 km Ground Time of Flight Range / Altitude R = C t / 2 4 “Fancy” Lidar Architecture Transceiver (Light Source, Light Collection, Lidar Detection) Holographic Optical Element Data Acquisition (HOE) & Control System Courtesy to Geary Schwemmer 5 From Searchlight to Modern Lidar Light detection and ranging (LIDAR) started with using CW searchlights to measure stratospheric aerosols and molecular density in 1930s. Hulburt [1937] pioneered the searchlight technique. Elterman [1951, 1954, 1966] pushed the searchlight lidar to a high level and made practical devices. The first laser - a ruby laser was invented in 1960 by Schawlow and Townes [1958] (fundamental work) and Maiman [1960] (construction). The first giant-pulse technique (Q-Switch) was invented by McClung and Hellwarth [1962]. The first laser studies of the atmosphere were undertaken by Fiocco and Smullin [1963] for upper region and by Ligda [1963] for troposphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision – Front Cover
    EnVision – Front Cover ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Proposal Name: EnVision Lead Proposer: Richard Ghail Core Team members Richard Ghail Jörn Helbert Radar Systems Engineering Thermal Infrared Mapping Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute for Planetary Research, Imperial College London, United Kingdom DLR, Germany Lorenzo Bruzzone Thomas Widemann Subsurface Sounding Ultraviolet, Visible and Infrared Spectroscopy Remote Sensing Laboratory, LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, University of Trento, Italy France Philippa Mason Colin Wilson Surface Processes Atmospheric Science Earth Science and Engineering, Atmospheric Physics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom University of Oxford, United Kingdom Caroline Dumoulin Ann Carine Vandaele Interior Dynamics Spectroscopy and Solar Occultation Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, de Nantes, Belgium France Pascal Rosenblatt Emmanuel Marcq Spin Dynamics Volcanic Gas Retrievals Royal Observatory of Belgium LATMOS, Université de Versailles Saint- Brussels, Belgium Quentin, France Robbie Herrick Louis-Jerome Burtz StereoSAR Outreach and Systems Engineering Geophysical Institute, ISAE-Supaero University of Alaska, Fairbanks, United States Toulouse, France EnVision Page 1 of 43 ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Executive Summary Why are the terrestrial planets so different? Venus should be the most Earth-like of all our planetary neighbours: its size, bulk composition and distance from the Sun are very similar to those of Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Surface Thermal Design of the Mars 2020 Rover
    45th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2015-134 12-16 July 2015, Bellevue, Washington Preliminary Surface Thermal Design of the Mars 2020 Rover Keith S. Novak1, Jason G. Kempenaar2, Matthew Redmond3and Pradeep Bhandari4. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 9110 The Mars 2020 rover, scheduled for launch in July 2020, is currently being designed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Mars 2020 rover design is derived from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover, Curiosity, which has been exploring the surface of Mars in Gale Crater for over 2.5 years. The Mars 2020 rover will carry a new science payload made up of 7 instruments. In addition, the Mars 2020 rover is responsible for collecting a sample cache of Mars regolith and rock core samples that could be returned to Earth in a future mission. Accommodation of the new payload and the Sampling Caching System (SCS) has driven significant thermal design changes from the original MSL rover design. This paper describes the similarities and differences between the heritage MSL rover thermal design and the new Mars 2020 thermal design. Modifications to the MSL rover thermal design that were made to accommodate the new payload and SCS are discussed. Conclusions about thermal design flexibility are derived from the Mars 2020 preliminary thermal design experience. Nomenclature AFT = Allowable Flight Temperature ChemCam = Chemistry and Camera instrument (MSL instrument) DAN = Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons (MSL instrument) DTE = Direct-to-Earth
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Women of Achievement Honorees Name Year City Andrews
    Georgia Women of Achievement Honorees Name Year City Andrews, Eliza Frances (Fanny) 2006 Washington Southern writer (1840-1931) incl 2 botany books Andrews, Ludie Clay 2018 Milledgeville 1st black registered nurse in Georgia, founder of Grady nursing school for colored nurses. Anthony, Madeleine Kiker 2003 Dahlonega community activist for Dahlonega Atkinson, Susan Cobb Milton 1996 Newnan influenced her governor-husband to fund grants for women to attend college; successfully petitioned legislature to create what would be Georgia College & St Univ at Milledgeville; appointed postmistress of Newnan by Pres TRoosevelt. Bagwell, Clarice Cross 2020 Cumming Trailblazer in Georgia education; Bagwell School of Education at KSU Bailey, Sarah Randolph 2012 Macon eductor, civic leader, GS leader Bandy, Dicksie Bradley 1993 Dalton entrepreneur - carpet industry; initiated economic revitalization of NW Georgia aftr Great Depression via homemade tufted bedspreads; philanthropist; benefactor to Cherokee Nation Barrow, Elfrida de Renne 2008 Savannah author, poet Beasley, Mathilda 2004 Savannah black Catholic nun who ran a school for black children Berry, Martha McChesney 1992 Rome educator, founder Berry College Black, Nellie Peters 1996 Atlanta social & civic leader; pushed for womens' admittance to UGA; aligned with Pres TRoosevelt re agricultural diversification & Pres Wilson re conservation. Bosomworth, Mary Musgrove 1993 Savannah cultural liaison between colonial Georgia & her Native American community Bynum, Margaret O 2007 Atlanta 1st FT consultant
    [Show full text]