DOCSLIB.ORG

Information Wants to Be a Topic Map

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Information Wants to Be a Topic Map Leipziger Beiträge zur Informatik: Band XXIV Information Wants to be a Topic Map Sixth International Conference on Topic Maps Research and Applications, TMRA 2010 Leipzig, Germany, September 29 – October 01, 2010 Revised Selected Papers Lutz Maicher Lars Marius Garshol (Eds.) Information Wants to be a Topic Map Sixth International Conference on Topic Maps Research and Applications, TMRA 2010 Leipzig, Germany, September 29 – October 01, 2010 Revised Selected Papers Volume Editors Dr. Lutz Maicher University of Leipzig Institut für Informatik Johannisgasse 26, 04103 Leipzig, Germany [email protected] Lars Marius Garshol Bouvet AS Sandakerveien 24C D11 NO-0403 Oslo, Norway [email protected] More information about the TMRA conference and the online versions of all papers within this volume are available at the website: http://www.tmra.de/2010 Information Wants to be a Topic Map Sixth International Conference on Topic Maps Research and Applications, TMRA 2010 Leipzig, Germany, September 29 – October 01, 2010 Revised Selected Papers Lutz Maicher, Lars Marius Garshol (Eds.) – Leipzig, 2010 ISBN 978-3-941608-11-5 Preface The papers in this volume were presented at TMRA 2010, the International Conference on Topic Maps Research and Applications, held 30 September and 1 October 2010, in Leipzig, Germany. TMRA 2010 is the sixth conference in this annual series of international conferences dedicated to Topic Maps in science and industry. The motto of the TMRA 2009 conference, “Linked Topic Maps”, was about spinning a global web of interchangeable and linkable topic maps. Linked Topic Maps was about lightweight semantic integration and fusion of heterogeneous sources of structured and unstructured data, based on the integration model provided by Topic Maps. With the Topic Maps 2010 conference in Oslo the first applications of linked topic maps in industry emerged. At the same time the stack of freely available Topic Maps software grew considerably within the last months. The technology is ready for the next level of scale. But scalability needs data. It was Kal Ahmed at the TMRA 2009 conference who coined the motto for this year’s conference: “Information wants to be free. Information wants to be a topic map.” With the TMRA 2010 conference various approaches to make Topic Maps based data available was explored. There is a wide range of means for producing these maps: starting with generic Topic Maps editors, over web portals and domain specific desktop applications, to advanced approaches of exposing data sources as virtual topic maps. Consequently new data sources generate new applications. Which new kind of applications are possible and already implemented? Do these applications require new data sources which are not available in the Topic Maps world today? Generally, all kinds of applications are of interest – the scaling, web-based ones and the applications on the enterprise level. They all have one thing in common: they all need information which behaves like topic maps. The goal of the TMRA 2010 conference was bringing together all the ideas, concepts and implementations which will help to make information accessible and usable in a Topic Mappish way. The paradigm of the TMRA 2010 conference was that everything which behaves like a topic map is a topic map, irrespective of its origin. It’s all about paving the way for global knowledge federation. Stimulated by the success of the previous conferences the concept of TMRA was retained nearly unchanged. The conference was preceded by tutorials@TMRA 2010, a full day of in-depth tutorials. The main conference schedule was separated into two parallel tracks, providing a rich program for all interests. The Open Space sessions, once more smoothly moderated by Lars Marius Garshol, provided a light and exciting look at work which will most likely be presented at future conferences. The “Topic Maps Elevator Pitch Contest at TMRA 2010” was a new feature of this year’s TMRA conference. The participants got the stage for 60 seconds. This was their opportunity to explain the idea and the benefits of Topic Maps to the audience. To win the contest the crowd at TMRA had to be convinced with the pitch. The TMRA 2010 program attracted an international crowd from the Topic Maps community, hosted in the media campus of the Leipzig Media Foundation. The scientific quality of the conference was ensured by the international Program Committee with around 36 members. Out of 39 submissions, 20 were accepted as papers for these proceedings. We would like to thank all those who contributed to this book for their excellent work and great cooperation. Furthermore, we want to thank all members of the Program Committee and especially Prof. Dr. G. Heyer and Benjamin Bock, for their tireless commitment to make TMRA 2010 a success. TMRA was organized by the Zentrum für Informations-, Wissens- und Dienstleistungsmanagement at the University of Leipzig. We thank Anika Jahn for her engagement in the organization of the conference and Peter Scholz for producing these proceedings. Furthermore we acknowledge the generous support by all our sponsors. We hope all participants enjoy a successful conference, make a lot of new contacts, gain from fruitful discussions helping to solve current research problems, and have a pleasant stay in Leipzig. Last but not least we hope to see you again at TMRA 2011. Leipzig and Oslo, Lutz Maicher September 2010 Lars Marius Garshol Organization TMRA 2010 was organized by the Zentrum für Informations-, Wissens- und Dienstleistungsmanagement e.V. (ZIWD) in Leipzig, Germany. Chairs of the Program Committee Lutz Maicher, Topic Maps Lab, University of Leipzig, DE (Chair) Lars Marius Garshol, Bouvet, NO (Co-Chair) Program Committee Marie-Hélène Abel, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France Kal Ahmed, NetworkedPlanet, UK Frédéric Andrès, NII, Japan Michel Biezunski, Coolheads Consulting, USA Arnim Bleier, Topic Maps Lab at the University of Leipzig, Germany Benjamin Bock, Topic Maps Lab at the University of Leipzig, Germany Robert Cerny, Researcher, Germany Darina Dicheva, Winston-Salem State University, USA Ralf Eilbracht, Nexxor, Germany Lars Marius Garshol, Bouvet, Norway Lars Heuer, Researcher, Germany Gerhard Heyer, University of Leipzig, Germany Tobias Hofmann, Researcher, Germany Stefan Kesberg, Nexxor, Germany Aki Kivelä, Grips Studios Interactive, Finland Tomáš Kliegr, Ptague University of Economics, Czech Republic Giovani Rubert Librelotto, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Brasil Stefan Lischke, Researcher, Germany Lutz Maicher, Topic Maps Lab at the University of Leipzig, Germany James David Mason, Y-12 National Security Complex, USA Thomas Neidhart, Space Application Services, Belgium Steven R. Newcomb, Coolhead Consulting, USA Jan Nowitzky, Deutsche Börse, Germany Sam Oh, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea Jack Park, Researcher, USA Rani Pinchuk, Space Application Services, Belgium Jan Schreiber, Ravn, Norway Alexander Sigel, Researcher, Germany Michael Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies, USA Kevin Trainor, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA Johannes Schmidt, Researcher, Germany Stefan Smolnik, European Business School, Germany Thomas Schwotzer, HTW Berlin, Germany Volker Stümpflen, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany Markus Ueberall, Researcher, Germany Gerhard Weber, Nexxor, Germany Organization Committee Lutz Maicher, Topic Maps Lab, University of Leipzig, DE (Chair) Benjamin Bock, Topic Maps Lab, University of Leipzig, DE (Chair) Anika Jahn, Topic Maps Lab, University of Leipzig, DE (Chair) Sponsoring Organizations Networked Planet, Oxford, UK Ravn Webveveriet AS, Oslo, NO Norwegian Computer Society, Oslo, NO Wandora Team, Helsinki, FI Morpheus Kenntnistechnologie BV, Utrecht, NL Mediafoundation of the Sparkasse Leipzig, DE Topic Maps Lab, Leipzig, DE Table of Contents I Topic Maps Frontends AToM2 – a “web database” with Topic Maps Roots ::::::::::::::::::::::: 3 Pavel Gardavský Putting Topic Maps to REST ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 9 David Damen and Maria Patriksson Designing a GUI Description Language with Topic Maps ::::::::::::::::::: 19 Lukas Georgieff II Practical Topic Maps Research Modeling Units of Measurement :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 29 Xuân Baldau Subject Headings make information to be topic maps :::::::::::::::::::::: 43 Motomu Naito Inquiry Optimization Techniquefor a Topic Map Database :::::::::::::::::: 53 Yuki Kuribara and Masaomi Kimura III Information Wants to be a Topic Map Topic Maps for Improved Access to and Use of Content in Relational Databases – a Case Study on the Descriptive Variety Lists of Germany’s Bundessortenamt ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 65 Gerhard E. Weber, Ralf Eilbracht, and Stefan Kesberg IV Optimizing Data Access Spatial Identification of Subjects :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 75 Sven Krosse Defining Domain-Specific Facets for Topic Maps with TMQL Path Expressions ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 85 Sven Windisch and Lutz Maicher X Table of Contents V Investigation Ontology Structure External Schema for Topic Map Database ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 93 Keita Nabeta, Takashi Kojima, Yuki Kuribara, Takashi Yamazaki and Masaomi Kimura Evaluation of Instances Asset in a Topic Maps-Based Ontology :::::::::::::: 101 Petra Haluzová Topic Maps Graph Visualization & Suggested GTM ::::::::::::::::::::::: 107 Rani Pinchuk and Jelle Pelfrene VI Semantic Integration A new approach to semantic integration ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 117 Lars Marius Garshol
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lyon-Nist241assmoct9.Pdf
    NIST Special Publication 500-241 Information Technology: A Quick-Reference List of Organizations and Standards for Digital Rights Management Gordon E. Lyon NIST Special Publication 500-241 Information Technology: A Quick-Reference List of Organizations and Standards for Digital Rights Management Gordon E. Lyon Convergent Information Systems Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8951 October 2002 U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L. Evans, Secretary Technology Administration Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director Reports on Information Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) stimulates U.S. economic growth and industrial competitiveness through technical leadership and collaborative research in critical infrastructure technology, including tests, test methods, reference data, and forward-looking standards, to advance the development and productive use of information technology. To overcome barriers to usability, scalability, interoperability, and security in information systems and networks, ITL programs focus on a broad range of networking, security, and advanced information technologies, as well as the mathematical, statistical, and computational sciences. This Special Publication 500-series reports on ITL’s research in tests and test methods for information technology, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved DITA 2.0 Proposals
    DITA Technical Committee DITA 2.0 proposals DITA TC work product Page 1 of 189 Table of contents 1 Overview....................................................................................................................................................3 2 DITA 2.0: Stage two proposals.................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Stage two: #08 <include> element.................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Stage two: #15 Relax specialization rules......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Stage two: #17 Make @outputclass universal...................................................................................9 2.4 Stage two: #18 Make audience, platform, product, otherprops into specializations........................12 2.5 Stage two: #27 Multimedia domain..................................................................................................16 2.6 Stage two: #29 Update bookmap.................................................................................................... 20 2.7 Stage two: #36 Remove deprecated elements and attributes.........................................................23 2.8 Stage two: #46: Remove @xtrf and @xtrc...................................................................................... 31 2.9 Stage 2: #73 Remove delayed conref domain.................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • A 3-Tier Application for Topic Map Technology
    Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, December 16-18, 2006 356 A 3-tier Application for Topic Map Technology A. PAPASTERGIOU, G. GRAMMATIKOPOULOS*, A. HATZIGAIDAS, G. TRYFON Department of Electronics, (*) Department of Esthetics Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, EPEAEK II Sindos, 57400, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, GREECE Abstract: In the context of this paper the design and construction of a 3-tier application system for topic map technology is presented in detail. The proposed system employs Enterprise Topic Map Server (ETMS) that manages topic maps (TM) and establishes communication with client applications and persistent database. Yellow Web Services have been customized in order to achieve communication issues and exchange of TM. A client application is addressed to TM developers for editing and visualization of TM. Furthermore, the definition of TM Schema as well as the possibility to process rules and queries are supported. Another key aspect of the present paper is to analyze how different technologies utilized to formulate such a system. Key-words: Topic map, Server, Web services, Client, 3-tier, TM schema, Retrieval 1 Introduction definition of TM Schema as well as the possibility to The Topic Map model describes a mechanism for process rules and queries are also supported. In the representing knowledge about the structure of next sections the overall architecture of the proposed information and organizing it into topics [1,19]. Topics system as well as technologies that are implied in have occurrences and associations that define order to build the system are represented in details. relationships between the topics, creating thus a semantic network over the information [8,18].
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Topic Maps to Common Logic
    MAPPING TOPIC MAPS TO COMMON LOGIC Tamas´ DEMIAN´ Advisor: Andras´ PATARICZA I. Introduction This work is a case study for the mapping of a particular formal language (Topic Map[1] (TM)) to Common Logic[2] (CL). CL was intended to be a uniform platform ensuring a seamless syntactic and semantic integration of knowledge represented in different formal languages. CL is based on first-order logic (FOL) with a precise model-theoretic semantic. The exact target language is Common Logic Interchange Format (CLIF), the most common dialect of CL. Both CL and TM are ISO standards and their metamodels are included in the Object Definition Metamodel[3] (ODM). ODM was intended to serve as foundation of Model Driven Architecture (MDA) offering formal basis for representation, management, interoperability, and semantics. The paper aims at the evaluation of the use of CL as a fusion platform on the example of TM. II. The Topic Maps TM is a technology for modelling knowledge and connecting this structured knowledge to relevant information sources. A central operation in TMs is merging, aiming at the elimination of redundant TM constructs. TopicMapConstruct is the top-level abstract class in the TM metamodel (Fig. 1). The later detailed ReifiableConstruct, TypeAble and ScopeAble classes are also abstract. The remaining classes are pairwise disjoint. Figure 1: The class hierarchy and the relation and attribute names of the TM metamodel. TopicMap is a set of topics and associations. Topic is a symbol used within a TM to represent exactly one subject, in order to allow statements to be made about that subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Mapping in ROS XAVIER GALLART DEL BURGO
    Semantic Mapping in ROS XAVIER GALLART DEL BURGO Master’s Thesis at CVAP/CAS, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Supervisor: Dr. Andrzej Pronobis Examiner: Prof. Danica Kragic August, 2013 Abstract In the last few years robots are becoming more popular in our daily lives. We can see them guiding people in museums, helping surgeons in hospitals and autonomously cleaning houses. With the aim of enabling robots to cooperate with humans and to perform human-like tasks we need to provide them with the capability of understanding human envi- ronments and representing the extracted knowledge in such a way that humans can interpret. Semantic mapping can be defined as the process of building a representation of the environment, incorporating semantic knowledge obtained from sensory information. Semantic properties can be extracted from various sources such as objects, topology of the envi- ronment, size and shape of rooms and room appearance. This thesis proposes an implementation of semantic mapping for mo- bile robots which is integrated in a framework called Robot Operat- ing System (ROS). The system extracts spatial properties like rooms, objects and topological information and combines them with common- sense knowledge into a probabilistic framework which is capable of in- ferring room categories. The system is tested in simulations and in real-world scenarios and the results show how the system explores an unknown environment, creates an accurate map, detects objects, infers room categories and represents the results in a map where each room is labelled according to its functionality. Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to my super- visor, Andrzej Pronobis, for giving me the opportunity to develop my thesis in one of my passions, the robots.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Map Aided Publishing
    A Case Study of Assembly Media Archive Topic Map Aided Publishing Grip Studios Interactive, Aki Kivelä 2.9.2004 Assembly’04 Media Archive WWW publishing platform. Publishes images, videos and related metadata real-time. Integrated to Assembly’s [1] publishing environment. Uses Topic Maps [2] to store knowledge. Supports heterogeneous data sources. Short development time . Short life span. [1] Assembly’04 http://www.assembly.org/ [2] Steve Pepper. The TAO of Topic Maps, finding the way in the age of infoglut http://www.gca.org/papers/xmleurope2000/pdf/s11-01.pdf 2 Publishing Environment of the Assembly Media Archive video production team VideoStore Media Archive Elaine topicmap image production team clients 3 Video Production Process Process and services were designed FTP by Assembly’04 crew. HTTP SERVER HTTP video production team VideoStore Media Archive Elaine topicmap image production team clients HTTP, WWW FORM HTTP, XML 4 Image Production Process Uploading images and metadata to Media Archive video production team VideoStore Media Archive Elaine topicmap image production team clients JPEG, XTM (TOPIC MAPS) TCP/IP, ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION 5 Merging Elaine Media Archive video & image knowledge Merging Topic Maps from heterogeneous sources Video XSL [3] Video XTM XML Topic Map XTM MERGE [4] Merged XTM Topic Map Image Image XTM XTM Topic Map Topic Map Administration Ontology Application Media Archive XTM Topic Map [3] XSL Style Sheets http://www.w3c.org/Style/XSL/ [4] Merging Topic Maps http://www.topicmaps.org/xtm/index.html#desc-merging 6 Topic Map Topic Maps Map of information resources Collection of Topics, Associations between topics and related information resources (Occurrences) Steve Pepper.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Subjects: Introduction and Basic Requirements
    Published Subjects: Introduction and Basic Requirements OASIS Published Subjects Technical Committee Recommendation, 2003-06-24 Document identifier: pubsubj-pt1-1.01-cs Location: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?wg_abbrev=tm- pubsubj Editor: Steve Pepper <[email protected]> Contributors: Bernard Vatant (TC Chair), Suellen Stringer-Hye (TC Secretary), James David Mason (TC Liaison with ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34), Thomas Bandholtz, Vivian Bliss, Patrick Durusau, Peter Flynn, Eric Freese, Lars Marius Garshol, Kim Sung Hyuk, Motomu Naito, Eamonn Neylon, Mary Nishikawa, Michael Priestley, H. Holger Rath, Don Smith Abstract: This document provides an introduction to Published Subjects and basic requirements and recommendations for publishers of Published Subjects. Status: Committee Specification Copyright © 2003 The Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards [OASIS] Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. A Gentle Introduction to Published Subjects 2.1 Subjects and Topics 2.2 The Identification of Subjects 2.3 The Addressability of Subjects 2.4 Subject Indicators and Subject Identifiers 2.4.1 Subject Identification for Humans: Subject Indicators 2.4.2 Subject Identification for Computers: Subject Identifiers 2.4.3 Distinguishing between Subject Addresses and Subject Identifiers 2.4.4 Example: Identifying the Subject "Apple" 2.5 Published Subjects 2.5.1 Shortcomings of the above scenario 2.5.2 Publishers in the loop 2.5.3 Example: A Published Subject for "Apple" 2.6 The Adoption of PSIs 3. Requirements and Recommendations for PSIs 3.1 Requirements for PSIs 3.1.1 A PSID must be a URI 3.1.2 A PSID must resolve to a PSI 3.1.3 A PSI must explicitly state its PSID 3.2 Recommendations for PSIs 3.2.1 A PSI should provide human-readable metadata 3.2.2 A PSI may provide machine-readable metadata 3.2.3 Human-readable and machine-readable metadata should be consistent but need not be equivalent 3.2.4 A PSI should indicate its intended use as a PSI 3.2.5 A PSI should identify its publisher 4.
    [Show full text]
  • XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps Outline
    XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps Erik Wilde 16.7.2001 XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps 1 Outline what is XML? z a syntax (not a data model!) what is the data model behind XML? z XML Information Set (basically, trees...) what can be described with XML? z describing the content syntactically (schemas) z describing the content abstractly (metadata) XML metadata is outside of XML documents ISO Topic Maps z a "schema language" for meta data 16.7.2001 XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps 2 1 Extensible Markup Language standardized by the W3C in February 1998 a subset (aka profile) of SGML (ISO 8879) coming from a document world z data are documents defined in syntax z no abstract data model problems in many real-world scenarios z how to compare XML documents z attribute order, white space, namespace prefixes, ... z how to search for data within documents z query languages operate on abstract data models z often data are not documents 16.7.2001 XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps 3 Why XML at all? because it's simple z easily understandable, human-readable because of the available tools z it's easy to find (free) XML software because of improved interoperability z all others do it! z easy to interface with other XML applications because it's versatile z the data model behind XML is very versatile 16.7.2001 XML Metadata Standards and Topic Maps 4 2 XML Information Set several XML applications need a data model z style sheets for XML (CSS, XSL) z interfaces to programming languages (DOM) z XML transformation languages (XSLT) z XML
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing the Evidentiary Value of Oral Histories for Use in Digital Libraries
    DESIGNING A GRIOTTE FOR THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: INCREASING THE EVIDENTIARY VALUE OF ORAL HISTORIES FOR USE IN DIGITAL LIBRARIES A Dissertation by RHONDA THAYER DUNN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Major Subject: Computer Science DESIGNING A GRIOTTE FOR THE GLOBAL VILLAGE: INCREASING THE EVIDENTIARY VALUE OF ORAL HISTORIES FOR USE IN DIGITAL LIBRARIES A Dissertation by RHONDA THAYER DUNN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, John J. Leggett Committee Members, Frank M. Shipman III Anat Geva Walter D. Kamphoefner Head of Department, Valerie Taylor August 2011 Major Subject: Computer Science iii ABSTRACT Designing a Griotte for the Global Village: Increasing the Evidentiary Value of Oral Histories for Use in Digital Libraries. (August 2011) Rhonda Thayer Dunn, B.S., Xavier University of Louisiana; M.C.S., Howard University; M.U.P., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. John J. Leggett A griotte in West African culture is a female professional storyteller, responsible for preserving a tribe‘s history and genealogy by relaying its folklore in oral and musical recitations. Similarly, Griotte is an interdisciplinary project that seeks to foster collaboration between tradition bearers, subject experts, and computer specialists in an effort to build high quality digital oral history collections. To accomplish this objective, this project preserves the primary strength of oral history, namely its ability to disclose ―our‖ intangible culture, and addresses its primary criticism, namely its dubious reliability due to reliance on human memory and integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
    Committee: (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document V1 :[] Information technology - Document Container File -- Part 1: Core CD 21340-1 :[] Information technology - Extensions of Office Open XML File Formats - Part 1: CD 30114-1 Guidelines :[] Information technology - Extensions of Office Open XML - Part 2: Character CD 30114-2 Repertoire Checking INCITS/ISO 8879:1986:[R2009] Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/AM Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/AM1:1988 1:1988:[2010] Language (SGML) - Amendment 1 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/COR Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/COR 1:1996 1:1996:[2010] Language (SGML) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 INCITS/ISO/IEC 8879:1986/COR Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup IS 8879:1986/COR 2:1999 2:1999:[2010] Language (SGML) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 2 INCITS 207-:1991[S2012] Alternate Keyboard Arrangement for Alphanumeric Machines N/A Created: 11/16/2014 Page 1 of 11 Committee: (V1) - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface National Designation Title (Click here to purchase standards) ISO/IEC Document INCITS/ISO/IEC 9541-2:2012:[2013] Information technology - Font information interchange - Part 2: Interchange format IS 9541-2:2012 INCITS/ISO/IEC 9541-3:2013:[2013] Information
    [Show full text]
  • Mindjet Mindmanager 7 Help Guide
    Mindjet MindManager 7 Help Guide Table Of Contents Getting Started.......................................................................................... 1 Welcome to Mindjet® MindManager® 7 Work Smarter, Think Creatively, Save Time... Everyday ...............................................................................1 Get Started ................................................................................................1 Compatibility with earlier versions ...........................................................2 Contact us..................................................................................................2 Learn About MindManager and Mapping ................................................3 MindManager interface ............................................................................3 MindManager views.................................................................................4 Topic types................................................................................................5 Basic steps to mapping .............................................................................6 Help resources ..........................................................................................7 Privacy policy............................................................................................8 What Information We Collect...................................................................8 Why We Collect This Information ............................................................8 What Information
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Search Terminology
    TopQuadrant Technology Research Dictionary of Search Terminology TQTR-Search02_color.doc Date 4/10/2003 Page 1 of 23 10:52 AM Copyright ® 2002 - 2003 TopQuadrant, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in U.S.A. Confidential, Unpublished Property of TopQuadrant TopQuadrant Technology Research TQTR-Search02 Dictionary of Search Terminology Table of Contents TopQuadrant Technology Research ............................................................................... 1 Dictionary of Search Terminology .................................................................................. 1 Search Technology Overview........................................................................................... 5 How Search Works ................................................................................................... 5 Categorization and Search ....................................................................................... 6 The Reasons for publishing and using a Dictionary of Search Terminology...... 6 Dictionary .......................................................................................................................... 6 Adaptive probabilistic concept modeling (APCM)................................................ 6 Boolean Search .......................................................................................................... 6 Bayesian Inference or Bayesian Statistics ..................................................... 6 Capitalization ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]